# Multiple Testing. Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh, and Michael Wolf. Abstract

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Multiple Testing. Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh, and Michael Wolf. Abstract"

## Transcription

1 Multiple Testing Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh, and Michael Wolf Abstract Multiple testing refers to any instance that involves the simultaneous testing of more than one hypothesis. If decisions about the individual hypotheses are based on the unadjusted marginal p-values, then there is typically a large probability that some of the true null hypotheses will be rejected. Unfortunately, such a course of action is still common. In this article, we describe the problem of multiple testing more formally and discuss methods which account for the multiplicity issue. In particular, recent developments based on resampling result in an improved ability to reject false hypotheses compared to classical methods such as Bonferroni. KEY WORDS: Multiple Testing, Familywise Error Rate, Resampling 1

2 Multiple testing refers to any instance that involves the simultaneous testing of several hypotheses. This scenario is quite common in much of empirical research in economics. Some examples include: (i) one fits a multiple regression model and wishes to decide which coefficients are different from zero; (ii) one compares several forecasting strategies to a benchmark and wishes to decide which strategies are outperforming the benchmark; (iii) one evaluates a program with respect to multiple outcomes and wishes to decide for which outcomes the program yields significant effects. If one does not take the multiplicity of tests into account, then the probability that some of the true null hypotheses are rejected by chance alone may be unduly large. Take the case of S = 100 hypotheses being tested at the same time, all of them being true, with the size and level of each test exactly equal to α. For α = 0.05, one expects five true hypotheses to be rejected. Further, if all tests are mutually independent, then the probability that at least one true null hypothesis will be rejected is given by = Of course, there is no problem if one focuses on a particular hypothesis, and only one of them, a priori. The decision can still be based on the corresponding marginal p-value. The problem only arises if one searches the list of p-values for significant results a posteriori. Unfortunately, the latter case is much more common. Notation Suppose data X is generated from some unknown probability distribution P. In anticipation of asymptotic results, we may write X = X (n), where n typically refers to the sample size. A model assumes that P belongs to a certain family of probability distributions, though we make no rigid requirements for this family; it may be a parametric, semiparametric, or nonparametric model. Consider the problem of simultaneously testing a null hypothesis H s against the alternative hypothesis H s, for s = 1,..., S. A multiple testing procedure (MTP) is a rule which makes some decision about each H s. The term false discovery refers to the rejection of a true null hypothesis. Also, let I(P ) denote the set of true null hypotheses, that is, s I(P ) if and only if H s is true. We also assume that a test of the individual hypothesis H s is based on a test statistic T n,s, with large values indicating evidence against H s. A marginal p-value for testing H s is denoted by ˆp n,s. Familywise Error Rate Accounting for the multiplicity of individual tests can be achieved by controlling an appropriate error rate. The traditional or classical familywise error rate (FWE) is the probability of one 2

3 or more false discoveries: FWE P = P {reject at least one hypothesis H s : s I(P )}. Control of the FWE means that, for a given significance level α, FWE P α for any P. (1) Control of the FWE allows one to be 1 α confident that there are no false discoveries among the rejected hypotheses. Note that control of the FWE is equated with finite-sample control: (1) is required to hold for any given sample size n. However, such a requirement can often only be achieved under strict parametric assumptions or for special randomization set-ups. Instead, we then settle for asymptotic control of the FWE: lim sup n Methods Based on Marginal p-values FWE P α for any P. (2) MTPs falling in this category are derived from the marginal or individual p-values. They do not attempt to incorporate any information about the dependence structure between these p-values. There are two advantages to such methods. First, we might only have access to the list of p-values from a past study, but not to the underlying complete data set. Second, such methods can be very quickly implemented. On the other hand, as discussed later, such methods are generally suboptimal in terms of power. To show that such methods control the desired error rate, we need a condition on the p-values corresponding to the true null hypotheses: H s true s I(P ) = P {ˆp n,s u} u for any u (0, 1). (3) Condition (3) merely asserts that, when testing H s alone, the test that rejects H s when ˆp n,s u has level u, that is, it is a proper p-value. The classical method to control the FWE is the Bonferroni method, which rejects H s if and only if ˆp n,s α/s. More generally, the weighted Bonferroni method rejects H s if ˆp n,s w s α/s, where the constants w s, satisfying w s 0 and s w s = 1, reflect the importance of the individual hypotheses. An improvement is obtained by the method of Holm (1979). The marginal p-values are ordered from smallest to largest: ˆp n,(1) ˆp n,(2)... ˆp n,(s) with their corresponding null hypotheses labeled accordingly: H (1), H (2),..., H (S). Then, H (s) is rejected if and only if ˆp n,(j) α/(s j + 1) for j = 1,..., s. In other words, the method starts with testing the most significant hypothesis by comparing its p-value to α/s, just as the Bonferroni method. If the hypothesis is rejected, then the method moves on to the second most significant hypothesis by comparing its p-value to α/(s 1), and so on, until the procedure comes to a stop. Necessarily, 3

4 all hypotheses rejected by Bonferroni will also be rejected by Holm, but potentially a few more will be rejected, too. So, trivially, the method is more powerful, though it still controls the FWE under (3). If it is known that the p-values are suitably positive dependent, then further improvements can be obtained with the use of Simes identity; see Sarkar (1998). So far, we have assumed finite-sample validity of the null p-values expressed by (3). However, often p-values are derived by asymptotic approximations or resampling methods, only guaranteeing asymptotic validity instead: H s true s I(P ) = lim sup P {ˆp n,s u} u for any u (0, 1). (4) n Under this more realistic condition, the MTPs presented in this section only provide asymptotic control of the FWE in the sense of (2). Single-step versus Stepwise Methods In single-step MTPs, individual test statistics are compared to their critical values simultaneously, and after this simultaneous joint comparison, the multiple testing method stops. Often there is only one common critical value, but this need not be the case. More generally, the critical value for the sth test statistic may depend on s. An example is the weighted Bonferroni method discussed above. Often single-step methods can be improved in terms of power via stepwise methods, while still maintaining control of the desired error rate. Stepdown methods start with a single-step method but then continue by possibly rejecting further hypotheses in subsequent steps. This is achieved by decreasing the critical values for the remaining hypotheses depending on the hypotheses already rejected in previous steps. As soon as no further hypotheses are rejected, the method stops. The Holm (1979) method discussed above is a stepdown method. Stepdown methods therefore improve upon single-step methods by possibly rejecting less significant hypotheses in subsequent steps. In contrast, there also exist stepup methods that step up to examine the more significant hypotheses in subsequent steps. See Romano and Shaikh (2006). More general methods to construct MTPs which control the FWE can be obtained by the closure method; see Hochberg and Tamhane (1987). Resampling Methods Accounting for Dependence Methods based on p-values often achieve (asymptotic) control of the FWE by assuming (i) a worst-case dependence structure or (ii) a convenient dependence structure (such as mutual independence). This has two potential disadvantages. In case of (i), the method can be quite suboptimal in terms of power if the true dependence structure is quite far away from the worst-case scenario. In case of (ii), if the convenient dependence structure does not hold, even 4

5 asymptotic control may not result. As an example for case (i), consider the Bonferroni method. If the p-values were perfectly dependent, then the cut-off value could be changed from α/s to α. While perfect dependence is rare, this example serves to make a point. In the realistic scenario of strong cross-dependence, the cut-off value could be changed to something a lot larger than α/s while still maintaining control of the FWE. Hence, it is desirable to account for the underlying dependence structure. Of course, this dependence structure is unknown and must be (implicitly) estimated from the available data. Consistent estimation, in general, requires that the sample size grows to infinity. Therefore, in this subsection, we will settle for asymptotic control of the FWE. In addition, we will specialize to making simultaneous inference on the elements of a parameter vector θ = (θ 1,..., θ S ) T. Assume the individual hypotheses are one-sided of the form: Modifications for two-sided hypotheses are straightforward. H s : θ s 0 vs. H s : θ s > 0. (5) The test statistics are of the form T n,s = ˆθ n,s /ˆσ n,s. Here, ˆθ n,s is an estimator of θ s computed from X (n). Further, ˆσ n,s is either a standard error for ˆσ n,s or simply equal to 1/ n in case such a standard error is not available or only very difficult to obtain. We start by discussing a single-step method. An idealized method would reject all H s for which T n,s d 1 where d 1 is the 1 α quantile under P of the random variable max s (ˆθ n,s θ s )/ˆσ n,s. Naturally, the quantile d 1 does not only depend on the marginal distributions of the centered statistics (ˆθ n,s θ s )/ˆσ n,s but, crucially, also on their dependence structure. Since P is unknown, the idealized critical value d 1 is not available. But it can be estimated consistently under weak regularity conditions as follows. Take ˆd 1 as the 1 α quantile under ˆP n of max s (ˆθ n,s ˆθ n,s )/ˆσ n,s. Here, ˆPn is an unrestricted estimate of P. Further ˆθ n,s and ˆσ n,s are the estimator of θ s and its standard error (or simply 1/ n), respectively, computed from X (n), where X (n), ˆP n. In other words, we use the bootstrap to estimate d 1. The particular choice of ˆPn depends on the situation. In particular, if the data are collected over time a suitable time series bootstrap needs to be employed; see Davison and Hinkley (1997) and Lahiri (2003). We have thus described a single-step MTP. However, a stepdown improvement is possible. In any given step j, we simply discard the hypotheses that have been rejected so far and apply the single-step MTP to the remaining universe of non-rejected hypotheses. The resulting critical value ˆd j necessarily satisfies ˆd j ˆd j 1 so that new rejections may result; otherwise the method stops. This bootstrap stepdown MTP provides asymptotic control of the FWE under remarkably weak regularity conditions. Mainly, it is assumed that n(ˆθ n θ) converges in distribution to a (multivariate) continuous limit distribution and that the bootstrap consistently estimates this limit distribution. In addition, if standard errors are employed for ˆσ n,s, as opposed to simply using 1/ n, then it is assumed that they converge to the same non-zero limiting values in probability, both in the real world and in the bootstrap world. Under even weaker regularity conditions, a subsampling approach could be used instead; see Romano and Wolf 5

6 (2005). Furthermore, when a randomization setup applies, randomization methods can be used as an alternative; see Romano and Wolf (2005) again. Related methods are developed in White (2000) and Hansen (2005). However, both works are restricted to single-step methods. In addition, White (2000) does not consider Studentized test statistics. Stepwise bootstrap methods to control the FWE are already proposed in Westfall and Young (1993). An important difference in their approach is that they bootstrap under the joint null; that is, they use a restricted estimate of P where the contraints of all null hypotheses jointly hold. This approach requires the so-called subset pivotality condition and is generally less valid than the approaches discussed so far based on an unrestricted estimate of P ; for instance, see Example 4.1 of Romano and Wolf (2005). Generalized Error Rates So far, attention has been restricted to the FWE. Of course, this criterion is very strict; not even a single true hypothesis is allowed to be rejected. When S is very large, the corresponding multiple testing procedure (MTP) might result in low power, where we loosely define power as the ability to reject false null hypotheses. Let F denote the number of false rejections and let R denote the total number of rejections. The false discovery proportion (FDP) is defined as FDP = (F/R) 1{R > 0}, where 1{ } denotes the indicator function. Instead of the FWE, we may consider the probability of the FDP exceeding a small, pre-specified proportion: P {FDP > γ}, for some γ [0, 1). The special choice of γ = 0 simplifies to the traditional FWE. Another alternative to the FWE is the false discovery rate (FDR), defined to be the expected value of the FDP: FDR P = E P [FDP]. By allowing for a small (expected) fraction of false discoveries, we can generally gain a lot of power compared with FWE control, especially when S is large. For a discussion of MTPs that provide (asymptotic) control of the FDP and the FDR, the reader is referred to Romano et al. (2008a, 2008b) and the references therein. 6

7 References Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hansen, P. R. (2005). A test for superior predictive ability. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 23: Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, New York. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6: Lahiri, S. N. (2003). Resampling Methods for Dependent Data. Springer, New York. Romano, J. P. and Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics, 34(4): Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M., and Wolf, M. (2008a). Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling (with discussion). Test, 17(3): Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M., and Wolf, M. (2008b). Formalized data snooping based on generalized error rates. Econometric Theory, 24(2): Romano, J. P. and Wolf, M. (2005). Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469): Sarkar, S. K. (1998). Some probability inequalities for ordered MT P 2 random variables: a proof of simes conjecture. Annals of Statistics, 26: Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-value Adjustment. John Wiley, New York. White, H. L. (2000). A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica, 68(5):

### FORMALIZED DATA SNOOPING BASED ON GENERALIZED ERROR RATES

Econometric Theory, 24, 2008, 404 447+ Printed in the United States of America+ DOI: 10+10170S0266466608080171 FORMALIZED DATA SNOOPING BASED ON GENERALIZED ERROR RATES JOSEPH P. ROMANO Stanford University

### STEPWISE MULTIPLE TESTING AS FORMALIZED DATA SNOOPING

Econometrica, Vol. 73, No. 4 (July, 2005), 1237 1282 STEPWISE MULTIPLE TESTING AS FORMALIZED DATA SNOOPING BY JOSEPH P. ROMANO AND MICHAEL WOLF 1 In econometric applications, often several hypothesis tests

### CONSONANCE AND THE CLOSURE METHOD IN MULTIPLE TESTING. Joseph P. Romano Azeem M. Shaikh Michael Wolf

CONSONANCE AND THE CLOSURE METHOD IN MULTIPLE TESTING By Joseph P. Romano Azeem M. Shaikh Michael Wolf Technical Report No. 2011-01 February 2011 Department of Statistics STANFORD UNIVERSITY Stanford,

### Adaptive Multiple Testing Procedures under Positive. Dependence

Adaptive Multiple Testing Procedures under Positive Dependence Wenge Guo Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, U.S.A. wenge.guo@gmail.com

### Multiple testing with gene expression array data

Multiple testing with gene expression array data Anja von Heydebreck Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Dept. Computational Molecular Biology, Berlin, Germany heydebre@molgen.mpg.de Slides partly

### Chapter 2. Multiple Testing Methodology. 2.1 Introduction. Alex Dmitrienko Eli Lilly and Company. Frank Bretz Novartis

Chapter 2 Multiple Testing Methodology Alex Dmitrienko Eli Lilly and Company Frank Bretz Novartis Peter H. Westfall Texas Tech University James Troendle National Institutes of Health Brian L. Wiens Alcon

### MAT X Hypothesis Testing - Part I

MAT 2379 3X Hypothesis Testing - Part I Definition : A hypothesis is a conjecture concerning a value of a population parameter (or the shape of the population). The hypothesis will be tested by evaluating

### False Discovery Rates

False Discovery Rates John D. Storey Princeton University, Princeton, USA January 2010 Multiple Hypothesis Testing In hypothesis testing, statistical significance is typically based on calculations involving

### Classical Hypothesis Testing and GWAS

Department of Computer Science Brown University, Providence sorin@cs.brown.edu September 15, 2014 Outline General Principles Classical statistical hypothesis testing involves the test of a null hypothesis

### p-values / Tests on Proportions Solutions STAT-UB.0103 Statistics for Business Control and Regression Models

p-values / Tests on Proportions Solutions STAT-UB.0103 Statistics for Business Control and Regression Models p-values 1. In the Quarter Pounder example, we we tested the null hypothesis that the weight

### Raimund Alt (Autor) Multiple Hypotheses Testing in the Linear Regression Model with Applications to Economics and Finance

Raimund Alt (Autor) Multiple Hypotheses Testing in the Linear Regression Model with Applications to Economics and Finance https://cuvillier.de/de/shop/publications/2694 Copyright: Cuvillier Verlag, Inhaberin

### Chapter 4: Constrained estimators and tests in the multiple linear regression model (Part II)

Chapter 4: Constrained estimators and tests in the multiple linear regression model (Part II) Florian Pelgrin HEC September-December 2010 Florian Pelgrin (HEC) Constrained estimators September-December

### Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models

Uncertainty quantification for the family-wise error rate in multivariate copula models Thorsten Dickhaus (joint work with Taras Bodnar, Jakob Gierl and Jens Stange) University of Bremen Institute for

### Hypothesis testing S2

Basic medical statistics for clinical and experimental research Hypothesis testing S2 Katarzyna Jóźwiak k.jozwiak@nki.nl 2nd November 2015 1/43 Introduction Point estimation: use a sample statistic to

### Test of Hypotheses. Since the Neyman-Pearson approach involves two statistical hypotheses, one has to decide which one

Test of Hypotheses Hypothesis, Test Statistic, and Rejection Region Imagine that you play a repeated Bernoulli game: you win \$1 if head and lose \$1 if tail. After 10 plays, you lost \$2 in net (4 heads

### SECOND PART, LECTURE 3: HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Massimo Guidolin Massimo.Guidolin@unibocconi.it Dept. of Finance STATISTICS/ECONOMETRICS PREP COURSE PROF. MASSIMO GUIDOLIN SECOND PART, LECTURE 3: HYPOTHESIS TESTING Lecture 3: Hypothesis Testing Prof.

### Controlling the Danger of False Discoveries in Estimating Multiple Treatment Effects

University of Zurich Department of Economics Working Paper Series ISSN 1664-7041 (print) ISSN 1664-705X (online) Working Paper No. 60 Controlling the Danger of False Discoveries in Estimating Multiple

### Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing CS 700

Hypothesis Testing CS 700 1 Hypothesis Testing! Purpose: make inferences about a population parameter by analyzing differences between observed sample statistics and the results one expects to obtain if

### A direct approach to false discovery rates

J. R. Statist. Soc. B (2002) 64, Part 3, pp. 479 498 A direct approach to false discovery rates John D. Storey Stanford University, USA [Received June 2001. Revised December 2001] Summary. Multiple-hypothesis

### Test Volume 12, Number 1. June 2003

Sociedad Española de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Test Volume 12, Number 1. June 2003 Resampling-based Multiple Testing for Microarray Data Analysis Yongchao Ge Department of Statistics University

### Estimation and Inference in Cointegration Models Economics 582

Estimation and Inference in Cointegration Models Economics 582 Eric Zivot May 17, 2012 Tests for Cointegration Let the ( 1) vector Y be (1). Recall, Y is cointegrated with 0 cointegrating vectors if there

### 1.2 Statistical testing by permutation

Statistical testing by permutation 17 Excerpt (pp. 17-26) Ch. 13), from: McBratney & Webster (1981), McBratney et al. (1981), Webster & Burgess (1984), Borgman & Quimby (1988), and François-Bongarçon (1991).

### Bayesian and Classical Inference

Eco517, Part I Fall 2002 C. Sims Bayesian and Classical Inference Probability statements made in Bayesian and classical approaches to inference often look similar, but they carry different meanings. Because

### Multiple forecast model evaluation

Multiple forecast model evaluation Valentina Corradi University of Warwick Walter Distaso Imperial College, London February 2010 Prepared for the Oxford Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Oxford University

### Bootstrapping Big Data

Bootstrapping Big Data Ariel Kleiner Ameet Talwalkar Purnamrita Sarkar Michael I. Jordan Computer Science Division University of California, Berkeley {akleiner, ameet, psarkar, jordan}@eecs.berkeley.edu

### Package dunn.test. January 6, 2016

Version 1.3.2 Date 2016-01-06 Package dunn.test January 6, 2016 Title Dunn's Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums Author Alexis Dinno Maintainer Alexis Dinno

### Chapter 4: Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Chapter 4: Statistical Hypothesis Testing Christophe Hurlin November 20, 2015 Christophe Hurlin () Advanced Econometrics - Master ESA November 20, 2015 1 / 225 Section 1 Introduction Christophe Hurlin

### TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS Rajender Parsad I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi 11 12 rajender@iasri.res.in In applied investigations or in experimental research, one may wish to estimate the yield of a new

### The Modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov One-Sample Test Statistic

Thailand Statistician July 00; 8() : 43-55 http://statassoc.or.th Contributed paper The Modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov One-Sample Test Statistic Jantra Sukkasem epartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science,

### Statistical issues in the analysis of microarray data

Statistical issues in the analysis of microarray data Daniel Gerhard Institute of Biostatistics Leibniz University of Hannover ESNATS Summerschool, Zermatt D. Gerhard (LUH) Analysis of microarray data

### Hypothesis Testing Level I Quantitative Methods. IFT Notes for the CFA exam

Hypothesis Testing 2014 Level I Quantitative Methods IFT Notes for the CFA exam Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Hypothesis Testing... 3 3. Hypothesis Tests Concerning the Mean... 10 4. Hypothesis Tests

### False Discoveries in Mutual Fund Performance: Measuring Luck in Estimated Alphas

False Discoveries in Mutual Fund Performance: Measuring Luck in Estimated Alphas Laurent Barras *, Olivier Scaillet * & Russ Wermers ** * FAME, University of Geneva ** University of Maryland Outline Motivations

### AUTOCORRELATED RESIDUALS OF ROBUST REGRESSION

AUTOCORRELATED RESIDUALS OF ROBUST REGRESSION Jan Kalina Abstract The work is devoted to the Durbin-Watson test for robust linear regression methods. First we explain consequences of the autocorrelation

### Hypothesis tests, confidence intervals, and bootstrapping

Hypothesis tests, confidence intervals, and bootstrapping Business Statistics 41000 Fall 2015 1 Topics 1. Hypothesis tests Testing a mean: H0 : µ = µ 0 Testing a proportion: H0 : p = p 0 Testing a difference

### Finding statistical patterns in Big Data

Finding statistical patterns in Big Data Patrick Rubin-Delanchy University of Bristol & Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research IAS Research Workshop: Data science for the real world (workshop 1)

### Two-Way ANOVA tests. I. Definition and Applications...2. II. Two-Way ANOVA prerequisites...2. III. How to use the Two-Way ANOVA tool?...

Two-Way ANOVA tests Contents at a glance I. Definition and Applications...2 II. Two-Way ANOVA prerequisites...2 III. How to use the Two-Way ANOVA tool?...3 A. Parametric test, assume variances equal....4

### Fallback tests for co-primary endpoints

Research Article Received 16 April 2014, Accepted 27 January 2016 Published online 25 February 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/sim.6911 Fallback tests for co-primary

### On Small Sample Properties of Permutation Tests: A Significance Test for Regression Models

On Small Sample Properties of Permutation Tests: A Significance Test for Regression Models Hisashi Tanizaki Graduate School of Economics Kobe University (tanizaki@kobe-u.ac.p) ABSTRACT In this paper we

### Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 124 (2004) 379 398 www.elsevier.com/locate/jspi Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data Edward L. Korn a;,

### Hypothesis Testing. Chapter Introduction

Contents 9 Hypothesis Testing 553 9.1 Introduction............................ 553 9.2 Hypothesis Test for a Mean................... 557 9.2.1 Steps in Hypothesis Testing............... 557 9.2.2 Diagrammatic

### Hypothesis Testing. 1 Introduction. 2 Hypotheses. 2.1 Null and Alternative Hypotheses. 2.2 Simple vs. Composite. 2.3 One-Sided and Two-Sided Tests

Hypothesis Testing 1 Introduction This document is a simple tutorial on hypothesis testing. It presents the basic concepts and definitions as well as some frequently asked questions associated with hypothesis

### MS&E 226: Small Data. Lecture 17: Additional topics in inference (v1) Ramesh Johari

MS&E 226: Small Data Lecture 17: Additional topics in inference (v1) Ramesh Johari ramesh.johari@stanford.edu 1 / 34 Warnings 2 / 34 Modeling assumptions: Regression Remember that most of the inference

### Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach

J. R. Statist. Soc. B (2004) 66, Part 1, pp. 187 205 Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach John D. Storey,

### An Alternative Route to Performance Hypothesis Testing

EDHEC-Risk Institute 393-400 promenade des Anglais 06202 Nice Cedex 3 Tel.: +33 (0)4 93 18 32 53 E-mail: research@edhec-risk.com Web: www.edhec-risk.com An Alternative Route to Performance Hypothesis Testing

### Instrumental Variables (IV) Instrumental Variables (IV) is a method of estimation that is widely used

Instrumental Variables (IV) Instrumental Variables (IV) is a method of estimation that is widely used in many economic applications when correlation between the explanatory variables and the error term

### Department of Economics

Department of Economics On Testing for Diagonality of Large Dimensional Covariance Matrices George Kapetanios Working Paper No. 526 October 2004 ISSN 1473-0278 On Testing for Diagonality of Large Dimensional

### MINITAB ASSISTANT WHITE PAPER

MINITAB ASSISTANT WHITE PAPER This paper explains the research conducted by Minitab statisticians to develop the methods and data checks used in the Assistant in Minitab 17 Statistical Software. 2-Sample

### Exact Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Means - A Personal Summary

Exact Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Means - A Personal Summary Karl H. Schlag European University Institute 1 December 14, 2006 1 Economics Department, European University Institute. Via della Piazzuola

### Non Parametric Inference

Maura Department of Economics and Finance Università Tor Vergata Outline 1 2 3 Inverse distribution function Theorem: Let U be a uniform random variable on (0, 1). Let X be a continuous random variable

### Lecture Topic 6: Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing

Lecture Topic 6: Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing 9.1 Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether a statement about the value of a population parameter should

### The Delta Method and Applications

Chapter 5 The Delta Method and Applications 5.1 Linear approximations of functions In the simplest form of the central limit theorem, Theorem 4.18, we consider a sequence X 1, X,... of independent and

### Weak-Instrument Robust Inference

Weak Instruments and Weak Identification with Applications to Time Series James H. Stock, Harvard University RES Easter School 2012, April 15 17, 2011 University of Birmingham Lecture 2 Weak-Instrument

### Statistiek I. t-tests. John Nerbonne. CLCG, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. John Nerbonne 1/35

Statistiek I t-tests John Nerbonne CLCG, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen http://wwwletrugnl/nerbonne/teach/statistiek-i/ John Nerbonne 1/35 t-tests To test an average or pair of averages when σ is known, we

### INFERENCE FOR THE IDENTIFIED SET IN PARTIALLY IDENTIFIED ECONOMETRIC MODELS. JOSEPH P. ROMANO Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4065, U.S.A.

http://www.econometricsociety.org/ Econometrica, Vol. 78, No. 1 (January, 2010), 169 211 INFERENCE FOR THE IDENTIFIED SET IN PARTIALLY IDENTIFIED ECONOMETRIC MODELS JOSEPH P. ROMANO Stanford University,

### PASS Sample Size Software. Linear Regression

Chapter 855 Introduction Linear regression is a commonly used procedure in statistical analysis. One of the main objectives in linear regression analysis is to test hypotheses about the slope (sometimes

### Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Multiple regression analysis:

Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 4: Inference Multiple regression analysis: We have discussed the conditions under which OLS estimators are unbiased, and derived the variances of

### Hypothesis Testing - II

-3σ -2σ +σ +2σ +3σ Hypothesis Testing - II Lecture 9 0909.400.01 / 0909.400.02 Dr. P. s Clinic Consultant Module in Probability & Statistics in Engineering Today in P&S -3σ -2σ +σ +2σ +3σ Review: Hypothesis

### Prep Course in Statistics Prof. Massimo Guidolin

MSc. Finance & CLEFIN A.A. 3/ ep Course in Statistics of. Massimo Guidolin A Few Review Questions and oblems concerning, Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals SUGGESTION: try to approach the questions

### 3. Nonparametric methods

3. Nonparametric methods If the probability distributions of the statistical variables are unknown or are not as required (e.g. normality assumption violated), then we may still apply nonparametric tests

### The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons

The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons Hervé Abdi 1 1 Overview The more tests we perform on a set of data, the more likely we are to reject the null hypothesis when it is true (i.e.,

### Cointegration. Basic Ideas and Key results. Egon Zakrajšek Division of Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board

Cointegration Basic Ideas and Key results Egon Zakrajšek Division of Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board Summer School in Financial Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics & Physics University of Ljubljana

### Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials

Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials Version 1.0 May 011 1. Power of a Test. Factors affecting Power 3. Required Sample Size RELATED ISSUES 1. Effect Size. Test Statistics 3. Variation 4. Significance

### Chapter 21. More About Tests and Intervals. Copyright 2012, 2008, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 21 More About Tests and Intervals Copyright 2012, 2008, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Zero In on the Null Null hypotheses have special requirements. To perform a hypothesis test, the null must be

### . This specification assumes individual specific means with Ey ( ) = µ. We know from Nickell (1981) that OLS estimates of (1.1) are biased for S S

UNIT ROOT TESTS WITH PANEL DATA. Consider the AR model y = αy ( ), it it + α µ + ε i it i =,... N, t =,..., T. (.) where the ε 2 IN(0, σ ) it. This specification assumes individual specific means with

### A Tutorial on False Discovery Control

A Tutorial on False Discovery Control Christopher R. Genovese Department of Statistics Carnegie Mellon University http://www.stat.cmu.edu/ ~ genovese/ This work partially supported by NSF Grants SES 9866147

### Econometrics The Multiple Regression Model: Inference

Econometrics The Multiple Regression Model: João Valle e Azevedo Faculdade de Economia Universidade Nova de Lisboa Spring Semester João Valle e Azevedo (FEUNL) Econometrics Lisbon, March 2011 1 / 24 in

### Testing the profitability of technical trading rules on stock markets

Testing the profitability of technical trading rules on stock markets ANDREI ANGHEL Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange* andrei.anghel@strade.ro CRISTIANA TUDOR International Business and Economics*

### Permutation Tests for Comparing Two Populations

Permutation Tests for Comparing Two Populations Ferry Butar Butar, Ph.D. Jae-Wan Park Abstract Permutation tests for comparing two populations could be widely used in practice because of flexibility of

### Testing Multiple Secondary Endpoints in Confirmatory Comparative Studies -- A Regulatory Perspective

Testing Multiple Secondary Endpoints in Confirmatory Comparative Studies -- A Regulatory Perspective Lilly Yue, Ph.D. Chief, Cardiovascular and Ophthalmic Devices Branch Division of Biostatistics CDRH/FDA

### Module 7: Hypothesis Testing I Statistics (OA3102)

Module 7: Hypothesis Testing I Statistics (OA3102) Professor Ron Fricker Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California Reading assignment: WM&S chapter 10.1-10.5 Revision: 2-12 1 Goals for this Module

### Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics

Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics John List Department of Economics University of Chicago jlist@uchicago.edu Azeem M. Shaikh Department of Economics University of Chicago amshaikh@uchicago.edu

### Power and Sample Size Determination

Power and Sample Size Determination Bret Hanlon and Bret Larget Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison November 3 8, 2011 Power 1 / 31 Experimental Design To this point in the semester,

### Multiple Comparisons

Multiple Comparisons October 16th & 18th, 2007 Reading: Chapter 7 HH Multiple Comparisons p. 1/2 Simultaneous Inferences Individual tests of hypotheses or confidence intervals Suppose you try to control

### Permutation P-values Should Never Be Zero: Calculating Exact P-values When Permutations Are Randomly Drawn

Permutation P-values Should Never Be Zero: Calculating Exact P-values When Permutations Are Randomly Drawn Gordon K. Smyth & Belinda Phipson Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Melbourne,

### The topics in this section concern with the second course objective.

3.2 Hypothesis Testing The topics in this section concern with the second course objective. In practice, a decision is often made according to the result of a statistical analysis, actually a statistical

### Use of Pearson s Chi-Square for Testing Equality of Percentile Profiles across Multiple Populations

Open Journal of Statistics, 2015, 5, 412-420 Published Online August 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojs http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.55043 Use of Pearson s Chi-Square for Testing Equality

### 1. How different is the t distribution from the normal?

Statistics 101 106 Lecture 7 (20 October 98) c David Pollard Page 1 Read M&M 7.1 and 7.2, ignoring starred parts. Reread M&M 3.2. The effects of estimated variances on normal approximations. t-distributions.

### Homework Zero. Max H. Farrell Chicago Booth BUS41100 Applied Regression Analysis. Complete before the first class, do not turn in

Homework Zero Max H. Farrell Chicago Booth BUS41100 Applied Regression Analysis Complete before the first class, do not turn in This homework is intended as a self test of your knowledge of the basic statistical

### Notes for STA 437/1005 Methods for Multivariate Data

Notes for STA 437/1005 Methods for Multivariate Data Radford M. Neal, 26 November 2010 Random Vectors Notation: Let X be a random vector with p elements, so that X = [X 1,..., X p ], where denotes transpose.

### Checklists and Examples for Registering Statistical Analyses

Checklists and Examples for Registering Statistical Analyses For well-designed confirmatory research, all analysis decisions that could affect the confirmatory results should be planned and registered

### Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

Chapter 8 Student Lecture Notes 8-1 Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Fall 26 Fundamentals of Business Statistics 1 Chapter Goals After completing this chapter, you should be able to: Formulate

### The Bootstrap. 1 Introduction. The Bootstrap 2. Short Guides to Microeconometrics Fall Kurt Schmidheiny Unversität Basel

Short Guides to Microeconometrics Fall 2016 The Bootstrap Kurt Schmidheiny Unversität Basel The Bootstrap 2 1a) The asymptotic sampling distribution is very difficult to derive. 1b) The asymptotic sampling

### Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis 1 Contents: Lehrstuhl für Department Empirische of Wirtschaftsforschung Empirical Research and und Econometrics Ökonometrie VI. Multivariate Cointegration

### A Review of Experimentwise Type I Error: Implications for Univariate Post Hoc and for. Multivariate Testing. Dan Altman

Experimentwise Error 1 Running Head: REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTWISE ERROR A Review of Experimentwise Type I Error: Implications for Univariate Post Hoc and for Multivariate Testing Dan Altman Texas A&M University

### Monte Carlo testing with Big Data

Monte Carlo testing with Big Data Patrick Rubin-Delanchy University of Bristol & Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research Joint work with: Axel Gandy (Imperial College London) with contributions from:

### p Values and Alternative Boundaries

p Values and Alternative Boundaries for CUSUM Tests Achim Zeileis Working Paper No. 78 December 2000 December 2000 SFB Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science Vienna

### Data Analysis and Uncertainty Part 3: Hypothesis Testing/Sampling

Data Analysis and Uncertainty Part 3: Hypothesis Testing/Sampling Instructor: Sargur N. University at Buffalo The State University of New York srihari@cedar.buffalo.edu Topics 1. Hypothesis Testing 1.

### 4) The role of the sample mean in a confidence interval estimate for the population mean is to: 4)

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Assume that the change in daily closing prices for stocks on the New York Stock Exchange is a random

### Experimental data and survey data

Experimental data and survey data An experiment involves the collection of measurements or observations about populations that are treated or controlled by the experimenter. A survey is an examination

### BA 275 Review Problems - Week 6 (10/30/06-11/3/06) CD Lessons: 53, 54, 55, 56 Textbook: pp. 394-398, 404-408, 410-420

BA 275 Review Problems - Week 6 (10/30/06-11/3/06) CD Lessons: 53, 54, 55, 56 Textbook: pp. 394-398, 404-408, 410-420 1. Which of the following will increase the value of the power in a statistical test

### On Marginal Effects in Semiparametric Censored Regression Models

On Marginal Effects in Semiparametric Censored Regression Models Bo E. Honoré September 3, 2008 Introduction It is often argued that estimation of semiparametric censored regression models such as the

### Hypothesis testing. c 2014, Jeffrey S. Simonoff 1

Hypothesis testing So far, we ve talked about inference from the point of estimation. We ve tried to answer questions like What is a good estimate for a typical value? or How much variability is there

### Math 62 Statistics Sample Exam Questions

Math 62 Statistics Sample Exam Questions 1. (10) Explain the difference between the distribution of a population and the sampling distribution of a statistic, such as the mean, of a sample randomly selected

### Recall this chart that showed how most of our course would be organized:

Chapter 4 One-Way ANOVA Recall this chart that showed how most of our course would be organized: Explanatory Variable(s) Response Variable Methods Categorical Categorical Contingency Tables Categorical

### THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The Black-Scholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages

### Nonparametric tests these test hypotheses that are not statements about population parameters (e.g.,

CHAPTER 13 Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Statistics Nonparametric tests these test hypotheses that are not statements about population parameters (e.g., 2 tests for goodness of fit and independence).

### TESTING THE ONE-PART FRACTIONAL RESPONSE MODEL AGAINST AN ALTERNATIVE TWO-PART MODEL

TESTING THE ONE-PART FRACTIONAL RESPONSE MODEL AGAINST AN ALTERNATIVE TWO-PART MODEL HARALD OBERHOFER AND MICHAEL PFAFFERMAYR WORKING PAPER NO. 2011-01 Testing the One-Part Fractional Response Model against

### Statistical foundations of machine learning

Machine learning p. 1/45 Statistical foundations of machine learning INFO-F-422 Gianluca Bontempi Département d Informatique Boulevard de Triomphe - CP 212 http://www.ulb.ac.be/di Machine learning p. 2/45