List of Figures. June 22, 2010

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "List of Figures. June 22, 2010"

Myra Ross
7 years ago
Views:

1 Color Images for Lothar Krempel: Network Visualization, In: John Scott and Peter J Carrington (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis London: Sage June 22, 2010 List of Figures 1 A schematic network drawing 2 2 A spring-layout of German capital ties for The Munsell System differentiates between nine levels of lightness and ten hues which are organized radially on each of the vertical levels Colors with identical saturation (chroma) are equidistant to the center It is a perceptually uniform color system 4 4 Color schemes for the communication of qualitative, sequential and divergent distributions (Cynthia Brewer, wwwcolorbrewerorg) 5 5 Using size to different centralities makes it easy to compare their distributions (compare fig 1) 6 6 A bipartite graph: Davis Southern Women 7 7 A block model: Southern Women 8 8 Mapping external attributes 9 9 Capital ties and attributes Visualizing the comparative static development of the German company system ( ) Geomi: s between scientists over time 12 1

2 Figure 1: A schematic network drawing Carol Andre Fernando Diane Heather Ike Jane Beverly Garth Ed Pajek 2

3 Figure 2: A spring-layout of German capital ties for 1996 Deutsche Bahn R+V Versicherung DG Bank Henkel Bosch Bosch-Siemens Victoria BMW Degussa Lufthansa BayerischeLB Siemens AMB Bilfinger+Berger AGIV EVS Schering Bayer BASF Bayerische Hypo Mˆ nchener Dresdner Rˆ ck Bank Hoechst Wacker-Chemie Hamburger Gesellschaft Beiersdorf Allianz Buderus Vereinte VIAG Bayerische Vereinsbank Bewag Colonia VEAG Metallgesellschaft MAN Volkswagen RWE Continental Bankgesellschaft Berlin Linde Daimler-Benz VEBA NordLB Deutsche Bank VEW Preussag Thyssen RAG Commerzbank Deutz Holzmann WestLB Gerling Sˆ dzucker Karstadt Krupp Deutsche Babcock Ruhrgas Mannesmann Pajek 3

4 Figure 3: The Munsell System differentiates between nine levels of lightness and ten hues which are organized radially on each of the vertical levels Colors with identical saturation (chroma) are equidistant to the center It is a perceptually uniform color system 4

5 Figure 4: Color schemes for the communication of qualitative, sequential and divergent distributions (Cynthia Brewer, wwwcolorbrewerorg)

6 Figure 5: Using size to different centralities makes it easy to compare their distributions (compare fig 1) Andre Beverly Andre Beverly Carol Diane Ed Diane (a) Degree Fernando Garth (c) Betweenness Fernando Garth Degree centrality Heather Ike Jane Betweenness centrality Heather Ike Andre Beverly Andre Beverly Carol Diane Ed (b) Closeness Fernando Garth Closeness centrality (d) Eigenvector centrality Carol Diane Ed Fernando Garth Heather Ike Jane Eigenvector centrality Heather Ike Jane 6

7 Figure 6: A bipartite graph: Davis Southern Women (a) Layout, degrees and sets Charlotte E1 E3 E4 Laura E5 Brenda Eleanor DGG: Southern Women spring embedding E2 Evelyn Theresa Frances Ruth E6 E8 E7 Verne Sylvia Pearl E9 Helen Nora Katherine E13 E14 Dorothy Myrna E12 E10 E11 Flora Olivia 2009 Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne (b) A two-mode blockmodel: 2 women and 3 event blocks Charlotte E1 E3 E4 Laura E5 Brenda Eleanor DGG: Southern Women two mode blockmodel E2 Evelyn Theresa Frances Ruth E6 E8 E7 Verne Sylvia Pearl E9 Helen Nora Katherine E13 E14 Dorothy Myrna E12 E10 E11 Flora Olivia 2009 Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne 7

8 Figure 7: A block model: Southern Women (a) Pie charts as node symbols Charlotte E1 E3 E4 Laura E5 Brenda Eleanor DGG: Southern Women two mode blockmodel E2 Evelyn Theresa Frances Ruth E6 E8 E7 Verne Sylvia Pearl E9 Helen Nora Katherine E13 E14 Dorothy Myrna E12 E10 E11 Flora Olivia 2009 Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne (b) using convex hulls Charlotte E1 E3 E4 Laura E5 Brenda Eleanor DGG: Southern Women two mode blockmodel E2 Evelyn Theresa Frances Ruth E6 E8 E7 Verne Sylvia Pearl E9 Helen Nora Katherine E13 E14 Dorothy Myrna E12 E10 E11 Flora Olivia 2009 Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne 8

9 Finance Two sets of nodes Finance Industry Financial volumes B Figure 8: Mapping external attributes A C Color scheme for links within and between classes Finance Industry Industry 9

10 Figure 9: Capital ties and attributes (a) attributes and spring layout Kapitalverflechtungen in Deutschland 1996 Mannesmann Ruhrgas Deutsche Babcock Südzucker Karstadt Krupp Gerling Deutz Holzmann WestLB Commerzbank RAG Thyssen Linde VEW Preussag Deutsche Bank Daimler Benz VEBA NordLB Volkswagen RWE Continental Bankgesellschaft Berlin Metallgesellschaft MAN Beiersdorf VEAG Bewag Bayerische Vereinsbank VIAG Vereinte Allianz Buderus Colonia BASF Schering Münchener Rück Hoechst Bayer Bayerische Hypo Wacker Chemie Dresdner Bank Hamburger Gesellschaft Siemens AMB Bilfinger+Berger AGIV EVS Bosch Siemens BMW Bosch Victoria Degussa Lufthansa BayerischeLB Henkel DG Bank Deutsche Bahn R+V Versicherung Kapitalbeteiligungen Finanz Finanz Industrie Industrie Finanz Industrie (b) A radial layout of status differences (Baur, Brandes & Wagner 2008) 10

11 Figure 10: Visualizing the comparative static development of the German company system ( ) (a) 1966 (b) 2000 Kirch Ruhrgas Mannesmann BASF Schering Telekom WestLB Wacker Chemie AGIV BASF Münchener Rück EVS DaimlerChrysler BMW BayHypoV K+S Bayer Deutsche Bank Südzucker MAN BayerischeLB Lufthansa Degussa Victoria Bewag Allianz Dresdener Bank BMW MG Technologies Bosch Siemens Bosch R+V Vers EON Hamburger Gesellschaft AMB Bilfinger+Berger Schering RWE KarstadtQuelle BayLB Hoechst Bayerische Hypo Dresdner Bank Siemens DG Bank RAG Colonia Lufthansa Münchener Rück ThyssenKrupp Siemens Bewag VIAG Buderus Bayer Shell D Ruhrgas Bankgesellschaft Berlin VEAG Bayerische Vereinsbank Atecs Deutsche Post Preussag Continental MAN Allianz BoschSiemens NordLB VEBA RWE Vereinte BabcockBorsig Preussag VEW Deutsche Bank Daimler Benz Volkswagen Metallgesellschaft SAP Vodafone D RAG Thyssen Beiersdorf Spar Bosch WestLB Holzmann Commerzbank Linde Salzgitter Aventis Gerling Deutz NordLB Springer Wacker Deutsche Babcock Krupp Karstadt Südzucker VW EADS Generali Continental Henkel Kapitalbeteiligungen 1996 Finanz Finanz Industrie Industrie Finanz Industrie Deutsche Bahn R+V Versicherung Linde Gerling Kapitalbeteiligungen 2000 Finanz Finanz Industrie Industrie Finanz Industrie DG Bank Commerzbank (c) 2002 (d) 2006 Fraport TUI Generali Hochtief Commerzbank Continental Deutsche Telekom ThyssenKrupp Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau RAG RWE BMW ThyssenKrupp Exxon Deutschland RAG BSH Bosch Siemens Generali EON Linde MAN Ruhrgas Siemens RWE Allianz Commerzbank Shell Deutschland Siemens MG Technologies AXA Münchener Rück BASF AG Wacker KarstadtQuelle Axel Springer Bosch Siemens BASF Deutsche Bank Deutsche Telekom Rhön Klinikum KfW Fresenius KarstadtQuelle GEA Deutsche Post TUI Hamburger Gesellschaft UniCredit Heidelberger Druck Bosch Schering Continental Südzucker Allianz Linde K+S Beiersdorf DaimlerChrysler EADS EON Deutsche Lufthansa Münchener Rück Deutsche Post Aventis Deutschland ArcelorMittal Bayerische Landesbank Robert Bosch Bayerische Hypo Bayer Bilfinger Berger Bayer Deutsche Bank K+S MAN Energie Baden W BMW Fresenius DaimlerChrysler Kapitalbeteiligungen 2002 Finanz Finanz Industrie Industrie Finanz Industrie Metro Haniel Nestlé Deutschland Kapitalbeteiligungen Finanz Finanz Industrie Industrie Finanz Industrie Vattenfall Volkswagen EADS Porsche 2008 Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne 11

12 Figure 11: Geomi: s between scientists over time 12

Adoption of IFRS in the EU: Legislative Background. PwC

Adoption of IFRS in the EU: Legislative Background PwC EU Regulation (EC)1606/2002 passed 19 July 2002 Article 4 Consolidated accounts of publicly traded companies For each financial year starting on or