TREATMENT SUMMARY. for. Phosphorus Inactivation in Long Pond. Brewster and Harwich, Massachusetts. The Towns of Brewster and Harwich, Massachusetts
|
|
- Shanon Harper
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Prepared for: The Towns of Brewster and Harwich, Massachusetts TREATMENT SUMMARY for Phosphorus Inactivation in Long Pond Brewster and Harwich, Massachusetts Prepared by: February 9 Document No. 13-1C
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background...1 Target Dose... Treatment Protocol... Treatment Process Review... Treatment Monitoring... Pre- and Post-Treatment Chemistry...7 Pre- and Post-Treatment Biology...1 Future Monitoring... Conclusion... Appendix A: Water Quality Data... Appendix B: Plant and Mollusk Data...3 Appendix C: Phytoplankton Data...37 TABLES Table 1. Planned aluminum doses to Long Pond... Table. Summary of ph, conductivity, and alkalinity data for Long Pond...9 Table 3. Zooplankton of Long Pond...19 FIGURES Figure 1. Long Pond treatment areas...3 Figure. Individual treatment areas in Long Pond...5 Figure 3. Selected temperature-dissolved oxygen profiles for Long Pond.... Figure. Average phosphorus concentration in epilimnetic and hypolimnetic waters on Long Pond...1 Figure 5. Selected phosphorus profiles for Long Pond...13 Figure. Secchi disk transparency in Long Pond....1 Figure 7. Secchi disk transparency in Long Pond since Figure. Abundance of mussels at survey sites in Long Pond...17 Figure 9. Cover by rooted plants at survey sites in Long Pond Figure 1. Phytoplankton of Long Pond...1 AECOM P.O. Box 5, 11 Phelps Way, Willington, CT 79-5 T F
3 Background Long Pond in Brewster and Harwich, MA covers 7 acres with a mean depth of 9 ft and a maximum depth of about 7 ft. Precipitation and groundwater are the dominant sources of water, with a smaller amount of runoff from the very sandy watershed. Long Pond is a popular swimming, boating and fishing destination. It has two major town beach/boat launch facilities, one each in Brewster and Harwich, plus another less developed beach and boat launch area in Harwich. Both towns have actively sought to protect the desirable qualities of the pond. Erratic summer algal blooms and small fishkills raised concern and prompted further study. Investigations have revealed a lack of oxygen with hydrogen sulfide production and release of phosphorus from bottom sediments in >3 ft of water. Diffusion and upward mixing of deeper waters during storms may both contribute to effective internal loading, which is estimated to supply 5 kg/yr (5%) to the upper waters out of a total load of between and 51 kg/yr. The remaining load is attributed mainly to watershed sources (%) and precipitation (%). Available phosphorus within the sediment ranged from. to. g/m based on data for the upper cm of sediment. More recent data () collected by the Town of Brewster indicates a very similar range of.7 to.5 g/m. A summer release of. g/m with only 1% reaching the epilimnion could raise the phosphorus concentration by more than. mg/l and support algal blooms. Anoxia has been a feature of deep water in Long Pond for at least half a century, but excessive internal recycling of nutrients accumulated over many years seems to be a more recent phenomenon. It may have taken many decades for the internal load to reach the threshold where it could supply sufficient phosphorus to cause the observed blooms. The release of previously bound and sedimented P inputs back into the water column is cause for concern on several grounds: 1. Some algae may be able to access this increased nutrient level by moving between lower and upper water layers. Some of the P accumulated in the bottom waters does pass into surface waters during summer, fueling algal growth 3. Upon eventual mixing, more of that accumulated P becomes available to algae. The long detention time of Long Pond means that seasonal events such as P release from sediment may have longer term impacts 5. The release of P without a commensurate release of nitrogen will lower N:P ratios and favor cyanobacteria, the most troublesome of algae Remedial action aimed at that internal load was chosen to restore desirable conditions in Long Pond, and protective measures in the watershed are to be implemented to slow down the accumulation of phosphorus and internal loading in the future. Aluminum treatment was favored over aeration methods. The primary reason for the choice of alum over aeration was economics, as an appropriate aeration system would cost at least as much as an alum treatment, but also requires annual maintenance and operational costs not incurred with the alum treatment. At issue with aluminum treatments is the potential toxicity of reactive aluminum outside the ph range of - standard ph units. Use of unbuffered aluminum sulfate in poorly buffered waters such as those on Cape Cod can lower the ph and produce transient toxicity immediately during treatment. Likewise, overbuffering can raise the ph and also produce short-term toxicity. While there is always some risk of an adverse reaction in any such application, understanding of the key factors allows a treatment with minimal risk to non-target flora and fauna of Long Pond. Follow-up sediment testing, dose response evaluation, and fish bioassays allowed determination of the necessary and most advantageous dose of which aluminum compounds. Treatment was permitted under the Wetlands Protection Act and the applicator received a License to Apply Chemicals from the MA DEP. The treatment was planned for late summer and early fall of 7. Page 1
4 Target Dose The keys to a successful treatment include assessment of necessary dose and choice of chemicals to achieve that dose while maintaining a near-neutral ph during treatment. Review of the ENSR 1 report suggested that the actual dose necessary over most of the pond is on the order of 5 g/m. With the additional testing conducted, plus fish bioassays to determine the most advantageous ratio of aluminum compounds to achieve a desirable ph, re-evaluation of the dose calculation facilitates appropriate dose determination (Table 1). Table 1. Planned aluminum doses to Long Pond Lake Segment Long West Long Central Long East Total Mean Available Sediment P (mg/kg DW) Target Depth of Sediment to be Treated (cm)... Volume of Sediment to be Treated per m (m3)... Specific Gravity of Sediment Mass of Sediment to be Treated (kg/m)... Mass of P to be Treated (g/m) Target Area (ac) Target Area (m) Aluminum sulfate 11.1 lb/gal and.% aluminum (lb/gal)... Sodium aluminate 1.1 lb/gal and 1.3% aluminum (lb/gal) Stoich. Ratio (ratio of Al to P in treatment) Ratio of alum to aluminate during treatment (volumetric) 1.:1 1.:1 1.:1 Aluminum Load and Alum + Aluminate volumes Dose (kg/area) Dose (lb/area) Dose (gal specs above Dose (gal specs above Application (gal/ac) for alum 11 7 Application (gal/ac) for aluminate 1 15 Anticipated days of treatment in area The treatment areas are shown in Figure 1. The planned dose was therefore just under 7, gallons of aluminum sulfate and about 3,3 gallons of sodium aluminate. Adjustment of ratios in the field is expected, and nuances of delivery, loading, and application will usually cause some deviation, but application at a ratio near 1.:1 (for aluminum sulfate:sodium aluminate by volume) was planned. This ratio has been found to cause no toxicity to fish in the lab at the expected concentrations of aluminum at the time of treatment, using fish species present in Long Pond and actual Long Pond water for the testing. Ratios closer to :1 represent the theoretical balance point for ph in lakes with low buffering capacity (i.e., inability to maintain ph in response to acid inputs), but with a ph of. to.5 in Long Pond, and the potential for some variability during treatment, the lower ratio of aluminum sulfate to sodium aluminate (which will cause the ph to rise slightly) was found to be most protective. Page
5 Figure 1. Long Pond treatment areas. Page 3
6 Treatment Protocol The plan was to apply aluminum sulfate and sodium aluminate at a volumetric ratio of 1.:1 over areas 3 ft deep at a total dose of 1 (East Basin) to 15 (West Basin) to 3 (Central Basin) g/m. The two chemicals are released simultaneously from a motorized barge through nozzles on a boom lowered about 1 ft below the water surface. The motor that moves the barge also promotes mixing of the chemical and the lake water. A fine floc forms in the water, binding some phosphorus then, but settling to the bottom within hours and inactivating phosphorus in the surficial sediments as the main goal of the treatment. Aquatic Control Technology of Sutton, MA performed the treatment. The treatment area within Long Pond was divided into smaller target areas that could be treated in one to three days (Figure ), and the barge traversed a GPS-guided path to deliver as even a dose as possible. The barge had to be reloaded multiple times per target area, as it carries only about 1 gallons of aluminum sulfate and 5 gallons of sodium aluminate at a time. Target areas were treated non-sequentially to the extent possible, avoiding treatment of large contiguous areas on consecutive days. The main beach for the Town of Harwich was used as the staging area for chemical delivery and loading of the barge. The East Basin, having only 13 acres of target treatment area and being the shallowest with the lowest planned dose, was the first area treated. Evaluation of treatment impacts was conducted over several days following treatment before any other target area was treated. There was no fish mortality, no mussel mortality, and no unusual water quality variation as a result of the initial treatment, so treatment of other target areas commenced four days later and ran to completion, with interruptions as determined by weather, mechnical problems, weekends, or any other factor determined by the Orders of itions issued by both Harwich and Brewster under the Wetlands Protection Act. Treatment Process Review The final chemical amounts applied at Long Pond were 7,91 gallons of aluminum sulfate and 37,5 gallons of sodium aluminate, yielding a ratio of 1.:1. This input is very close to that expected based on Table 1. Doses per treatment area followed the guidance of 1 g/m for the East Basin, 15 g/m for the West Basin, and 3 g/m for the Central Basin. Application target areas treated on specific days are shown in Figure. The dates of treatment for each target area are shown. Some Central Basin areas are numbered as an aid to planning the treatment sequence to avoid treating contiguous areas on consecutive days. The East Basin was treated first, as planned, then portions of the West Basin and Central Basin were treated in alternating fashion until the West Basin was completed. Remaining treatment focused on the Central Basin, where the most aluminum was applied. Page
7 Figure. Individual treatment areas in Long Pond. Page 5
8 Deviations from the planned process included: 1. Treatment took a total of 17 days; the minimum expected number of days was 13, and equipment problems resulted in multiple partial days of treatment. Equipment problems included mainly failed pumps and barge motors. The treatment team was prepared to address these, but some possible treatment time was lost as a result.. Treatment could not be performed on 3 days due to high wind. Such delays were required by the Orders of itions and expected to occur during the treatment period at some point. 3. Treatment was not performed on one Monday (Columbus Day) due to a planned rowing regatta and the potential for interference and related safety issues.. Aluminum floc drifted into water shallower than 3 ft even with only low wind. As a result, treatment was shifted into water >35 ft deep in the Central Basin, although some limited drift into shallower areas still occurred. 5. The bathymetric map was not accurate in a few areas, resulting in adjustment in the area treated. The total area treated was roughly the same as planned and the total dose was very close to that expected. The barge operator watched depth closely and adjusted as needed.. Two continguous target areas in the Central Basin were treated on consecutive days at the end of the program. By that time, it was apparent that there was negligible risk of biological impacts from such treatment. Treatment Monitoring Alkalinity measurement during treatment revealed low buffering capacity nearly everywhere and nearly all the time, as expected for this waterbody. Alkalinity ranged from to 5 mg/l at all stations, treated or untreated, over the pre-treatment and treatment period, with very little variability observed. Treatment did not depress alkalinity except at perhaps at the most localized level; sampling right behind the barge as it applied the aluminum chemicals revealed ph values that suggested higher or lower alkalinities, but those alkalinities were not directly measured. The ph of Long Pond is known to range naturally from about. to., and measurements in untreated areas ranged from.1 to.5 during the treatment period. Measurements taken in accordance with the approved monitoring program, which included measurements three times per day in the target area, indicated that treated areas experienced ph values that ranged from.1 to 7.. Assessment of the water as the aluminum compounds were being applied (within 1 ft of the barge) on the first few days of treatment revealed ph values as low as 5. and as high as., but only 5 values out of 3 such measurements were <. or >7.. Thereafter, adjustments were made to keep the ph between. and 7.. Mixing behind the barge was substantial. Visual assessment of floc formation with the videocamera indicated that applied aluminum compounds were mixed over a depth of about ft upon application. This reduces the maximum aluminum concentration that could occur to about 5 mg/l, the upper bound of what is considered safe even with fluctuating ph. This may have been an important factor in the complete lack of fish mortality. Adding the maintenance of ph within the range of. to 7. minimizes the reactive aluminum concentration to non-toxic levels. The noise of the Page
9 barge tends to scare away fish, so exposure to higher aluminum doses at ph values outside the desirable range was minimal. There was concern that some fish, especially alewife, might perceive the floc as a food item, but this was not observed to occur despite extensive surveillance with an underwater videosystem. The immediate treatment area was assessed just prior to treatment, during treatment, and immediately after treatment for ph and alkalinity, and for impacts on fish and mollusks by visual observation. Observation included the surface by eye and the bottom by remote video camera, and extended to areas peripheral to and also downwind of the treatment area. One dead fish was observed on the first day of treatment, and was quite obviously dead prior to the start of treatment. Fish, including alewife, yellow perch, catfish, and bass, were observed in the treatment area with no ill effects. Most alewife, however, were observed around the edge of Long Pond, as would be expected at that time of year. After the one pre-treatment dead fish was observed, no dead fish were found at any time during treatment or shortly thereafter. No molluscan deaths appeared attributable to treatment. We observed dead bivalve mollusks ( mussels ) before treatment in many areas, as might be expected (shells do not deteriorate rapidly after death). Mollusks are generally found at water depths <5 ft in Long Pond, so overlap with treatment areas was intended to be minimal, but some drift of floc was observed. Mollusks were not buried in floc in any area, but mollusks were observed with enough floc around them to potentially induce temporary closure of shells, which was observed. Inspection of untreated areas revealed similar portions of close shells, however, so it was not clear that even that situation was a reaction to treatment. Pre- and Post-Treatment Chemistry Water column samples were collected on September 1, 7, prior to the start of any treatment. Samples were collected monthly for a year after treatment. Analysis focused on temperature, dissolved oxygen, ph, alkalinity, conductivity, total and dissolved phosphorus, and dissolved aluminum. Aluminum levels were negligible prior to treatment and returned to levels below the detection limit shortly after treatment (Appendix A). Ambient levels in late October and November were not higher than for pre-treatment samples. A reduced detection limit was applied after treatment, and dissolved aluminum was only detected in of 3 post-treatment samples, and then at low levels not of ecological or human health concern. In accordance with the Orders of itions, no further sampling for aluminum was required. erature and dissolved oxygen profiles were obtained on each sampling date (Appendix A) and indicated a typical seasonal pattern. The only direct pre-and post-treatment comparison possible is September 1, 7 vs. either August or September 3,, but there are differences due to date and weather; this is not as direct a comparison as would be preferred. There is no indication of any major improvement in deep water oxygen from these profiles (Figure 3) in 7 and. Page 7
10 Figure 3. Selected temperature-dissolved oxygen profiles for Long Pond. LP-1 (9/1/7) LP-1 (//) LP-1 (9/3/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen LP- (9/1/7) LP- (//) LP- (9/3/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Page
11 Measurements of ph, conductivity and alkalinity indicated no significant changes over time, but an increase in conductivity and alkalinity and a decrease in ph in deep water during stratification (Appendix A). A summary of all data (Table ) does not suggest any major ecological or human health issue from the variability observed, particularly since the lowest ph values and highest alkalinity and conductivity levels occur only in the deepest water at a time of low or no oxygen in that small water layer within Long Pond. The treatment does not appear to have changed water chemistry over space or time with regard to ph, alkalinity and conductivity. Table. Summary of ph, conductivity, and alkalinity data for Long Pond. LP-1 LP- ph (SU) uctivity (us/cm) Alkalinity ph (SU) uctivity (us/cm) Alkalinity Minimum Mean Maximum Total and dissolved phosphorus concentrations were the direct target of the treatment, with the intent to lower these to the point where algal blooms would not be supported. Total phosphorus (TP) values on the order of. mg/l will tend to support algal blooms, while concentrations <.1 mg/l rarely do. Prior to treatment, on September 1, 7, TP levels ranged from. to.3 mg/l in the upper waters (-1 m during stratification) at LP-1 and.15 to. mg/l over the same depth range at LP-; mean values were. mg/l at LP-1 and.3 mg/l at LP- (Figure, Appendix A). In the bottom waters (>13 m deep) the concentration at LP-1 averaged.133 mg/l and that at LP- was.1 mg/l, indication the accumulation of TP in those bottom waters. Dissolved phosphorus (DP) values mirrored TP levels, but as a subset of TP, were somewhat lower (Appendix A). The accumulation of P in deep waters during stratification is related to both settling organic matter and release from bottom sediments, and some portion moves upward into the water column, increasing the concentrations in less deep water. The alum treatment was intended to greatly reduce the releases from bottom sediment, thereby reducing the movement into overlying waters. Only 1 to % of the released P is expected to reach the upper waters during the growing season, but that is till a significant amount. Additionally, as the lake has a retention time on the order of years, the mixing of the remaining deep water P when stratification breaks down can affect productivity in following years. In October 7, less than a month after treatment, TP concentrations averaged. mg/l at both LP-1 and LP-, with stratification nearly gone for the year. This was as expected for an aluminum treatment, and experience with spring treatments in other lakes suggested that low P levels would be Page 9
12 maintained for months to come. However, fall treatments are less common, and winter monitoring data for aluminum treatments are very rare, so the pattern that arose after October 7 was unexpected. In essence, TP and DP increased gradually between October 7 and April, with TP reaching levels similar to those of the upper layer from September 7 in April and May (Figure, Appendix A). DP levels did not recover to pre-treatment levels, but did increase to more than half the pre-treatment concentration. Figure. Average phosphorus concentration in epilimnetic and hypolimnetic waters on Long Pond. (Note that the scale is different for total and dissolved forms) Average Total Phosphorus Levels at LP-1 Average Dissolved Phosphorus Levels at LP Epi mean Hypo mean.5.5. Epi mean Hypo mean.1.35 TP.. TP Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-. Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Month Month Average Total Phosphorus Levels at LP- Average Dissolved Phosphorus Levels at LP-.1.1 Epi mean Hypo mean.3.5 Epi mean Hypo mean.. TP. TP Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Month Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-. Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Month Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Page 1
13 At the lower phosphorus levels observed, which are near the detection limit for the method applied, fluctuations of.5 or even.1 mg/l are not especially meaningful, but it is quite apparent that P concentrations were substantially reduced at the time of treatment, but then increased again over the winter and spring. Explanations are difficult to substantiate, but several have been postulated: 1. Just over half the volume of the lake was treated, so it would not have been surprising to see a slight rise as the lake completely mixed. Yet the rise was much more gradual than the mixing and resulted in a concentration similar to the pre-treatment level for TP, which would not be possible without additional P inputs.. New phosphorus inputs from the watershed, atmosphere, or groundwater might have raised the P concentration over the winter. With the change of just half the volume from an average of about. mg/l to. mg/l, that is a reduction of 7 kg of P. The annual contribution from all external sources (precipitation, runoff and inseepage) is estimated at a maximum of kg. No external source can explain the rising concentration, which even if all inputs were converted into aqueous P, amounts to at least 31 kg. 3. Incoming alewife may have raised the P level. There does appear to be a spike in P in April and May, but most alewife activity is in May, and the earlier increases in P could not be accounted for in this manner. Additionally, alewife runs have reportedly not been so large as to bring that much P into the lake in recent years.. Release of sediment P from untreated areas could contribute to the P content of the pond. There is undoubtedly some available P in the untreated portion of the lake, which is about half the area. However, this half of the area is shallow and the bottom is almost all sand and cobble; stored P would be minimal and high oxygen levels would restrict release of iron-bound P. Some contribution is possible, but not nearly enough to achieve pre-treatment P levels. 5. There may have been a rebound effect in which unbound sediment P was released in response to low P concentrations in overlying water. This is a complex chemical effect not known to routinely occur, particularly since the sediment P is supposed to be bound by aluminum. However, the dose was based on loosely sorbed and iron-bound P, not any portion of the organic P, some of which might be available. This is a cutting edge topic of debate in the scientific literature, and coupled with a lack of data for overwinter P levels following aluminum treatments, there is considerable uncertainty here. If, however, there was a major release of P over the to 7 months following treatment from organic sources, this P apparently was gradually inactivated (either by aluminum or by conversion to truly unavailable organic matter), as lower P levels were encountered in summer of and no appreciable deep water accumulation was noted after July. None of these explanations is particularly satisfying, but the possible release of sediment P that had been organically bound might account for the observed effect, having raised P to about what it was before the treatment. The input of at least 317 kg is within the estimated annual net internal load of 5 kg. Contributions for all the other mechanisms listed above might exist, and together they could have raised the P concentration as observed. The bigger question revolves around whether or not this was a one time occurrence in response to treatment or an annual process. Page 11
14 Either way, the use of available P by algae results in incorporation into particles that sink, and some portion of the P becomes unavailable over time (refractory organic matter). Some of the P is released by decay, incorporated into new algae, which either sink or are eaten by zooplankton that eventually die, many consumed by fish; again some portion of the P becomes unavailable. Without replenishment from the sediment, where most reserves are now bound in aluminum or refractory organic compounds, the P level in Long Pond should decline to a level supported by new inputs. That level is much lower than the pre-treatment level, based on the nutrient budget work performed to date. Over the summer of the results of the aluminum treatment more closely approximated initial expectations (Figure 5, Appendix A). There was some apparent build-up of deep water P in July, after stratification in late June, although this was only observed at the deepest point at LP- and could be an anomaly. TP values averaged.1 mg/l in Long Pond, with values declining rather that increasing over the summer. The absence of internal releases of available sediment P during the summer is apparent in the data and led to improved clarity. Water clarity, while not the direct target of the treatment, was the real goal of the project. Data for each station are presented in Figure, while a comparison of post-treatment data with data from is provided in Figure 7. Data from the last ten years of volunteer monitoring indicated summer Secchi disk transparency (SDT) values lower than the desired ft visibility on occasion and average values <1 ft. The SDT just before treatment was just under 11 ft, at the clear end of the September range for the last decade. SDT increased slightly in October and at one of the two monitoring stations in November, then decreased over the winter. Spring values were not identical in the two main basins of the lake, such that SDT continued to decrease through April at LP-, but was slightly better in March and April in LP-1 than it had been over the winter; values were still <1 ft, however. In May, clarity increased in both basins and the increase continued through August. There was a slight depression of SDT in September, but SDT increased again by the start of October. Within the context of the larger data base from the last 1 years, water clarity has not been measured over the winter months, so there is no basis for comparison. The water was as clear as it had been in a decade in September, just before treatment, and remained near the clear end of the historic range through December. However, the clearest end of that range is only 1 to 1 feet, and much greater clarity would have been expected from a spring aluminum treatment if internal loading was the primary P source. We have no overwinter comparative data, and only one April value, which was close to what was observed in after treatment. The May SDT value was in the clearer half of the historic range, at an average of 13.3 ft, but is not especially clear. From June through the start of October, SDT values were the highest observed in over a decade. The peak occurred in August, with a value in excess of 19 ft, about what was expected of the treatment. There was a dip in September, just like in virtually all previous monitoring years, but SDT remained higher than previously observed and 3 ft higher than in 7 just before treatment. SDT rose again at the start of October, to about 1 ft, a time when mixing yielded extra P in most years and depressed clarity. Monitoring ceased at this point, the regulatory obligation having been met. Page 1
15 Figure 5. Selected phosphorus profiles for Long Pond. Long Pond LP-1 Total Phosphorus Levels Total Phosphorus Depth (m) 1 1 9/1/7 1/5/7 7/1/ // 9/3/ Long Pond LP- Total Phosphorus Levels Total Phosphorus Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 7/1/ // 9/3/ Page 13
16 Oct, Figure. Secchi disk transparency in Long Pond. Figure a. Long Pond Secchi Disk Transparencies LP-1 Figure b. Long Pond Secchi Disk Transparencies LP- Sept, 7 Oct, 7 Nov, 7 Dec, 7 Jan, Mar, April, May, June, July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Sept, 7 Oct, 7 Nov, 7 Dec, 7 Jan, Mar, April, May, June, July, Aug, Sept, Page 1 Depth (ft) Depth (ft)
17 Figure 7. Secchi disk transparency in Long Pond since 199. SDT Pre-treatment Average SDT vs. Post-treatment Mean and Range for 199- data 7 data data Month Jan J Feb J Mar J Apr J May J Jun J Jul J Aug J Sep J Oct J Nov J Dec J SDT (ft) Treatment (7) Page 15
18 Pre- and Post-Treatment Biology A survey of mussel density was conducted in August prior to treatment and one year after treatment, with mussels quantified as absent, trace (1 per viewing field), sparse (- per field), moderate (5-1 per field) or dense (>1 per field). No dense populations were found, based on survey areas of about 1 m. The results indicated no significant change in mollusk abundance or distribution (Figure, Appendix B) between August of 7 and August of, based on observations at 11 locations. Rooted plants were monitored at the same time and locations as mussels, in August of 7 and. Eight species of vascular plants were observed, plus green and blue-green algal mats and the macroalga Nitella. Based on five cover categories (absent, 1=1-5%, =-5%, 3=51-75%, and =7-1%), there was no apparent difference between the pre- and post-treatment cover data (Figure 9, Appendix B). The same species were encountered each year, with Najas flexilis, Nitella flexilis, and Potamogeton pusillus var. tenuissimus most frequent. Phytoplankton were of definite interest in this evaluation, being the algae that most influence water clarity in Long Pond. In the 199s and early in this decade, blooms of cyanophytes (blue-green algae, or more properly cyanobacteria) greatly depressed water clarity in Long Pond. The results of monitoring and focused investigation determined that the key process was internal phosphorus loading, especially during dry weather. Wet weather tended to force iron-rich groundwater into the pond, which inactivated available P and limited its abundance. Hence the relatively wetter summers since 3 have fostered fewer blooms and higher water clarity. The treatment sought not so much to reduce algal abundance as to shift it away from cyanobacteria, which thrive at higher P levels. Phytoplankton in September, prior to the treatment, was dominated by cyanobacteria in terms of numbers of cells, and those cells are small, imparting more turbidity (and lowering clarity more) than larger cells at the same mass. After treatment cyanobacteria were much reduced, and while they regained dominance the following summer, the biomass was lower (Figure 1). Cell count approached 7,/mL in September 7, but exceeded 1, cells/ml only once after that, barely, in August, when cyanobacteria were again dominant. However, there was a shift in types of cyanobacteria, with only one of four previously common types observed after treatment. In terms of biomass, the September 7 samples were a fairly even mix of cyanobacteria, diatoms, golden algae and dinoflagellates, at 15 ug/l, a moderate value (Figure 1). Severe blooms often exceed 1, ug/l, while great clarity is associated with values <5 ug/l. Cyanobacteria were never again a significant fraction of the phytoplankton biomass. This is not surprising for winter or spring samples, which are often dominated by diatoms and golden algae as observed in Long Pond, and those algae are considered valuable parts of the food web. Yet the lack of significant cyanobacterial biomass in summer suggests that the treatment lowered the P concentration sufficiently to achieve control over algal biomass in general and specifically over cyanobacteria. Page 1
19 Figure. Abundance of mussels at survey sites in Long Pond. Pre- (August 7) and Post- (August ) Treatment Mussel Survey Results 1 Number of Sites with Listed Density 1 1 Moderate mussels Sparse mussels Trace mussels No mussels 7 Date Figure 9. Cover by rooted plants at survey sites in Long Pond. Pre- (August 7) and Post- (August ) Treatment Plant Survey Results Number of Sites with Listed Cover Rating Date Cover = Cover = 3 Cover = Cover = 1 No Plants Page 17
20 Figure 1. Phytoplankton of Long Pond. Figure 1A. Long Pond Phytoplankton Density 3 Density (Cells/mL) PYRRHOPHYTA EUGLENOPHYTA CYANOPHYTA CHRYSOPHYTA CHLOROPHYTA BACILLARIOPHYTA Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Date Figure 1B. Long Pond Phytoplankton Biomass 5 Biomass (ug/l) PYRRHOPHYTA EUGLENOPHYTA CYANOPHYTA CHRYSOPHYTA CHLOROPHYTA BACILLARIOPHYTA Sep- 7 Oct- 7 Nov- 7 Dec- 7 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Date Page 1
21 Biomass values were still moderate, but included mainly species of algae that are consumed in the food web more readily than cyanobacteria and impart less turbidity to the water. These results represent only one year of information, but indicate very favorable results of the treatment if they continue; clarity has been improved, but desirable algae have not been eliminated or even substantially depressed. Zooplantkon are also of substantial interest, as they consume algae and are an intermediate link in the food web. However, Long Pond hosts an annual run of sea-run alewife and has a potentially large population of juvenile alewife for the summer (or longer if the water level is too low for them to exit at the outlet). Alewife can minimize zooplankton populations by their density and feeding mode, which involves filtering the water column and straining out particles larger than about.3 mm. Ponds dominated by alewife have few large zooplankton, and often few zooplankton at all. Long Pond exhibits a classic alewife-impacted zooplankton population both before and after the treatment (Table 3). Biomass <1 ug/l provides limited grazing; Long Pond zooplankton average < ug/l. Mean size <.5 mm indicates few large grazers that can control algal density; Long Pond zooplankton average <. mm in length. A variety of types are present, none is particularly dominant, but none are abundant. In essence, there is no phytoplankton control by zooplankton, so algal biomass will be as large as nutrient levels allow. Controlling P is essential to preventing algal blooms in Long Pond. Table 3. Zooplankton of Long Pond LP-1 LP- LP-1 LP- SUMMARY STATISTICS 9/1/7 9/1/7 // // DENSITY (#/L) PROTOZOA.... ROTIFERA COPEPODA.... CLACERA OTHER ZOOPLANKTON.... TOTAL ZOOPLANKTON BIOMASS (ug/l) PROTOZOA.... ROTIFERA COPEPODA..5.. CLACERA OTHER ZOOPLANKTON.... TOTAL ZOOPLANKTON TAXONOMIC RICHNESS PROTOZOA ROTIFERA 3 COPEPODA 3 3 CLACERA 3 OTHER ZOOPLANKTON TOTAL ZOOPLANKTON S-W DIVERSITY INDEX EVENNESS INDEX MEAN LENGTH (mm): ALL FORMS MEAN LENGTH: CRUSTACEANS Page 19
22 Future Monitoring These results have indicated very favorable results of the treatment for the summer following treatment. There is no reason to believe that adverse impacts from the treatment on fish, invertebrates or plants would occur beyond the timeframe of this project, but the level and longevity of the improved phosphorus level, phytoplankton composition, and water clarity should be tracked. Also, some improvement in deep water oxygen levels remains to be seen. To that end, the following recommendations are offered: 1. Sample LP-1 and LP- monthly from April into October, with a sample collected at the surface and near the bottom for total and dissolved phosphorus.. At each station in each month, obtain a surface sample of phytoplankton for analysis and measure Secchi disk transparency. 3. At each station in each month, generate a temperature dissolved oxygen profile.. Convene the interested parties in each town to further a watershed management plan to protect the investment made in Long Pond through the treatment. There is an active volunteer monitoring group that could most likely handle the field portion of this program. AECOM would be happy to assist in any way, but it is most cost-effective to have the volunteer monitors conduct this program. Some professional assistance may be needed to develop the watershed management plan, and this was required in the Orders of itions for the project, but there are people in both towns who comprehend the need and have an understanding of the available techniques. Conclusion The treatment of Long Pond with aluminum compounds for the inactivation of phosphorus was successfully conducted in September and October of 7. Approximately 37 acres were treated with aluminum sulfate (7,91 gallons) and sodium aluminate (37,5 gallons) on 17 days over a day period. The ratio of alum to aluminate was 1.:1, close to the targeted ratio. Doses were approximately 1 g/m in the East Basin, 15 g/m in the West Basin, and 3 g/m in the Central Basin, as planned. Alkalinity was low but largely unaffected by treatment. The ph was maintained between. and 7. in all compliance samples, although additional samples collected to reveal the instantaneous extremes near the application point did yield a few values outside that range. No mortality of fish or mollusks was observed, despite extensive monitoring. Post-treatment assessment of water quality at multiple depths at two stations revealed a distinct decline in both total and dissolved phosphorus and no aluminum levels above pre-treatment values for two months after treatment. Beginning in November 7, phosphorus levels began to rise and water clarity declined. Late winter and spring phosphorus levels were similar to pre-treatment levels and spring water clarity was within the historic range observed in the pond, suggesting no distinct benefit from the treatment. Multiple possible explanations exist, but none is completely consistent with all data, and there is a minimal Page
23 track record for fall treatments and winter monitoring, so we have little context within which to evaluate this treatment for that time period. Several mechanisms may have combined to limit winterspring control of phosphorus and improved clarity. However, beginning in May and progressing through August, water clarity increased dramatically, exceeding all measured values for the last decade. There was a decrease in clarity in September, consistent with historic trends, but an increase at the start of October, after which monitoring ceased. Water clarity during summer was the highest observed in over a decade. Biologically, the treatment has had no measurable negative impact on any valued biota. Plant and mollusk communities are very similar between August 7 and August, and no dead fish were found during treatment, despite extensive surveys. There was no appreciable change in zooplankton, but this community is minimal in Long Pond as a consequence of abundant alewife. The change in phytoplankton is very encouraging; cyanobacteria that were responsible for past blooms were abundant in September 7, but have been minimal in biomass since then. Other algal groups more useful in the food web and less likely to cause problem blooms remain at moderate abundance. The treatment appears to have properly targeted problem algae without disrupting the food web. However, these conclusions are based on only one year of post-treatment data. Continued intensive monitoring does not appear necessary, but sampling of the two stations at the is warranted on a monthly basis beginning in April and running to October, with a focus on phosphorus, clarity, oxygen and phytoplankton. Page 1
24 Appendix A: Water Quality Data Page
25 Table A.1. Dissolved aluminum at LP-1. LP-1 values Aluminum Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 <.5.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5.11 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 Duplicate None None <.1 Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A Table A.. Dissolved aluminum at LP-. LP- values Aluminum Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 <.5.11 <.1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 1 <.5 <.1 <.1 Duplicate None <.1 None Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A Page 3
26 Table A.3. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Pre Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 9/1/7 9/1/7 Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 1/5/7 1/5/7 Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.5. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 11/15/7 11/15/7 Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Page
27 Table A.. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 1/13/7 1/13/7 Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.7. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 1/3/ 1/3/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 3/11/ 3/11/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Page 5
28 Table A.9. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- /15/ /15/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.1. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 5/1/ 5/1/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.11. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- /1/ /1/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Page
29 Table A.1. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 7/1/ 7/1/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.13. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- /// // Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Table A.1. Long Pond Water Quality Profiles- Post Treatment Monitoring LP-1 LP- 9/3/ 9/3/ Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Depth (m) ph (SU) (us/cm) Alk Page 7
30 Figure A.1. T- Profiles LP-1 (9/1/7) LP-1 (1/5/7) LP-1 (11/15/7) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen LP- (9/1/7) LP- (1/5/7) LP- (11/15/7) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Page
31 Figure A.. T- Profiles LP-1 (1/13/7) LP-1 (1/3/) LP-1 (3/11/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen LP- (1/13/7) LP- (1/3/) LP- (3/11/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Page 9
32 Figure A.3. T- Profiles LP-1 (/15/) LP-1 (5/1/) LP-1 (/1/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen LP- (/15/) LP- (5/1/) LP- (/1/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Page 3
33 Figure A.. T- Profiles LP-1 (7/1/) LP-1 (//) LP-1 (9/3/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen LP- (7/1/) LP- (//) LP- (9/3/) Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Page 31
34 Table A.15. Long Pond Total Phosphorus Levels at LP-1 Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 1/13/7 1/3/ 3/11/ /15/ 5/1/ /1/ 7/1/ // 9/3/ Duplicate None None.. None None None.3 None None None None Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Table A.1. Long Pond Dissolved Phosphorus Levels at LP-1 Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 1/13/7 1/3/ 3/11/ /15/ 5/1/ /1/ 7/1/ // 9/3/ < Duplicate None None.5. None None None.13 None None None None Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 3
35 Table A.17. Long Pond Total Phosphorus Levels at LP- Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 1/13/7 1/3/ 3/11/ /15/ 5/1/ /1/ 7/1/ // 9/3/ Duplicate None.3 None None None..1 None None Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blank(Distilled) None None None None None None Blank (DI water) None None None None None None None.7 None None None None Table A.1. Long Pond Dissolved Phosphorus Levels at LP- Depth (m) 9/1/7 1/5/7 11/15/7 1/13/7 1/3/ 3/11/ /15/ 5/1/ /1/ 7/1/ // 9/3/ Duplicate None.3 None None.9.9. None.7.13 None None Depth of Dup.(m) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blank(Distilled) None None None None None.5 Blank (DI water) None None None None None None None.11 None None None None Page 33
36 Appendix B: Plant and Mollusk Data Plant Cover or Biovolume None 1 1-5% -5% % 7-1% Plant Species Bg Ec Ea Fg Ld Nf Ni Ppt Prob Sg Va Blue-green algal mats Elodea canadensis Eleocharis acicularis Filamentous green algae Lobelia dortmanna Najas flexilis Nitella sp Potamogeton pusillus var. tenuissimus Potamogeton robbinsii Sagitaria graminea Vallisneria americana Sediment S C G M Mussels N T S M D Sand Cobble Gravel Muck None 1/field -/field 5-1/field >1/field Page 3
Carbon Dioxide in Fish Ponds
SRAC Publication No. 468 Southern Regional Aquaculture Center April 1996 PR VI Carbon Dioxide in Fish Ponds John Hargreaves and Martin Brunson* * Mississippi State University A pond breathes in and out
More informationWelcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:
Introduction Welcome to the learning module. This section provides information on the following topics: How dissolved oxygen is defined and measured in numbers Why dissolved oxygen is important Natural
More informationLIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY
LIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY PA RANI ET E R S, AN D c 0 IV D IT I 0 N S AND ECOREGIONS Water Quality Parameters Nutrients are important parameters because phosphorous and nitrogen are major nutrients required
More informationSPA Annual Report for 2002 September, 2003 Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Page 125. Evaluation and Recommendations
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Page 125 Evaluation and Recommendations Monitoring efforts in the Special Protection Areas continue to provide the kind of information needed to
More informationEcosystems and Food Webs
Ecosystems and Food Webs How do AIS affect our lakes? Background Information All things on the planet both living and nonliving interact. An Ecosystem is defined as the set of elements, living and nonliving,
More informationHÄSSLEHOLM COMMUNITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE THE RESTORATION OF LAKE FINJASJÖN
HÄSSLEHOLM COMMUNITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE THE RESTORATION OF LAKE FINJASJÖN Summary After having lowered the sea-level twice to gain farmland and heavy nutrient load mainly from sewage, Lake Finjasjön in 1950
More informationPond Ecosystem Field Study MOLS
This multi-week lab involves field studies comparing ecosystem-level ecology between 2 freshwater ponds in Marshfield Outdoor Learning Sanctuary. We will be investigating a correlation between weather
More informationWhat are the controls for calcium carbonate distribution in marine sediments?
Lecture 14 Marine Sediments (1) The CCD is: (a) the depth at which no carbonate secreting organisms can live (b) the depth at which seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcite (c) the depth at which
More informationLAKEWATCH Report for Dead in Gulf County Using Data Downloaded 10/6/2015
LAKEWATCH Report for Dead in Gulf County Introduction Lakes In 2012 Florida LAKEWATCH staff published the following three papers describing 1) how the location of lakes in different geologic areas (Figure
More informationWater Quality in College Creek, Annapolis, MD, 2003-2009 Dr. Peter Bergstrom, NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, FINAL 10/22/09
Methods Water Quality in College Creek, Annapolis, MD, 2003-2009 Dr. Peter Bergstrom, NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, FINAL 10/22/09 A State Highway Administration contractor, ESA, sampled water quality once
More informationAlgal Blooms, Circulators, Waterfowl and Eutrophic Greenfield Lake, NC. Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver, Ellen J. Wambach, and Anna R.
Algal Blooms, Circulators, Waterfowl and Eutrophic Greenfield Lake, NC Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver, Ellen J. Wambach, and Anna R. Robuck Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION. Technical Document DETERMINING REPRESENTATIVE GROUND WATER SAMPLES, FILTERED OR UNFILTERED
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION Technical Document DETERMINING REPRESENTATIVE GROUND WATER SAMPLES, FILTERED OR UNFILTERED JANUARY 1994 BUREAU OF DRINKING WATER AND GROUND WATER RESOURCES 2600 BLAIR
More informationSwamp Area Passive Treatment System Kettle Creek Watershed, Clinton County, PA
Swamp AMD Chemistry Swamp Area Passive Treatment System Kettle Creek Watershed, Clinton County, PA A Technical Report for Trout Unlimited and the Kettle Creek Watershed Association Prepared by Hedin Environmental
More informationSTATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL
STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL performed by Lee E. Harris, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Coastal
More informationBiology Keystone (PA Core) Quiz Ecology - (BIO.B.4.1.1 ) Ecological Organization, (BIO.B.4.1.2 ) Ecosystem Characteristics, (BIO.B.4.2.
Biology Keystone (PA Core) Quiz Ecology - (BIO.B.4.1.1 ) Ecological Organization, (BIO.B.4.1.2 ) Ecosystem Characteristics, (BIO.B.4.2.1 ) Energy Flow 1) Student Name: Teacher Name: Jared George Date:
More informationScheduling Maintenance for Infiltration Basins and Trenches
Visual Inspection for Infiltration Practices Visual inspection is a rapid assessment procedure for qualitatively evaluating the functionality of a stormwater best management practice (BMP). Visual inspections
More informationPhosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management. www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/nonpoint/phosphorus/phosphorusban.html
Phosphorus Phosphorus Brochure Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management Reducing Phosphorus Website Washington State Department of Ecology www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/nonpoint/phosphorus/phosphorusban.html Nutrients
More informationAppendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat
Appendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat 103 of 104 Jeddo Tunnel Abandoned Mine Drainage Passive vs. Active Treatment Cost Estimates Provided by Office of Surface Mining AMD Treat Software
More informationManaging Systems for Tilapia Culture
Auburn University and USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Alabama Aquaculture Best Management Practice (BMP) Managing Systems for Tilapia Culture BMP No. 17 Definition Tilapias (Oreochromis spp.)
More informationDESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS
DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS Phase I MS4 permits require continuous updating of the stormwater system inventory owned and operated by the MS4. They also include inspection
More informationQuantification of Reactive Phosphorus in Lake Mendota Sediments
Quantification of Reactive Phosphorus in Lake Mendota Sediments By: Jeremy, Advisor Dr. Mike Penn Most of the phosphorus (P) that enters lakes from external inputs is attached to soil or sediment. This
More informationThe role of CO 2 in pool water
The role of CO 2 in pool water A series of e-mail articles from the research group onbalance, January 2006 The role of CO 2 in pool water #1 While some service techs go about their business taking care
More informationA build-up of dirt and decaing organic matter is undesirable in koi ponds.
Hydrogen Sulphide in Koi Ponds A build-up of dirt and decaing organic matter is undesirable in koi ponds. KOISA No. 33 June 010 Hydrogen Sulphide Gas (HS) and Koi Ponds A build up of dirt and decaying
More informationWastewater Nutrient Removal
Wastewater Nutrient Removal An overview of phosphorus and nitrogen removal strategies Presented by: William E. Brown, P.E. Peter C. Atherton, P.E. Why are nutrients an issue in the environment? Stimulates
More informationWILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT 2009-10
WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT 2009-10 SUMMARY 2009-10 The Willochra Basin is situated in the southern Flinders Ranges in the Mid-North of South Australia, approximately 50 km east of Port Augusta
More informationESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF WATER-LEVEL MONITORING PROGRAMS. Selection of Observation Wells
ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF WATER-LEVEL MONITORING PROGRAMS Before discussing the uses and importance of long-term water-level data, it is useful to review essential components of a water-level monitoring
More informationStrawberry Industry Overview and Outlook. Feng Wu Research Associate Gulf Coast Research and Education Center University of Florida fengwu@ufl.
Strawberry Industry Overview and Outlook Feng Wu Research Associate Gulf Coast Research and Education Center University of Florida fengwu@ufl.edu Zhengfei Guan Assistant Professor Gulf Coast Research and
More informationModule 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key
Unit 1 Process Control Strategies Exercise Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key 1. What are the six key monitoring points within the activated sludge process? Ans:
More informationScott Market Report. Weather Affects Winter Sales
Mar. Apr. 2014 Scott Market Report Weather Affects Winter Sales Sales of real estate through the Outer Banks Association of Realtors MLS system for the last few months has been similar to the last two
More informationAn Assessment of Prices of Natural Gas Futures Contracts As A Predictor of Realized Spot Prices at the Henry Hub
An Assessment of Prices of Natural Gas Futures Contracts As A Predictor of Realized Spot Prices at the Henry Hub This article compares realized Henry Hub spot market prices for natural gas during the three
More informationThe concepts developed in this standard include the following: Oceans cover about 70% of the surface of the Earth.
Name Date Grade 5 SOL 5.6 Review Oceans Made by SOLpass - www.solpass.org solpass100@comcast.net Reproduction is permitted for SOLpass subscribers only. The concepts developed in this standard include
More informationWhich of the following can be determined based on this model? The atmosphere is the only reservoir on Earth that can store carbon in any form. A.
Earth s Cycles 1. Models are often used to explain scientific knowledge or experimental results. A model of the carbon cycle is shown below. Which of the following can be determined based on this model?
More informationDistribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
CEMP-CP Regulation No. 415-1-15 Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Construction CONSTRUCTION TIME EXTENSIONS FOR WEATHER ER 415-1-15 Distribution Restriction
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT
Freshwater WASTEWATER TREATMENT Water Quality 1. INDICATOR (a) Name: Wastewater treatment. (b) Brief Definition: Proportion of wastewater that is treated, in order to reduce pollutants before being discharged
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES The student will do the following: 1. Define wastewater and list components of wastewater. 2. Describe the function of a wastewater treatment plant. 3. Create a wastewater
More informationChapter 6. Commodity Forwards and Futures. Question 6.1. Question 6.2
Chapter 6 Commodity Forwards and Futures Question 6.1 The spot price of a widget is $70.00. With a continuously compounded annual risk-free rate of 5%, we can calculate the annualized lease rates according
More informationImportance of forestry reserves to the regulation of water quality and microalgae structure of temporary ponds in Burkina Faso (West Africa)
Importance of forestry reserves to the regulation of water quality and microalgae structure of temporary ponds in Burkina Faso (West Africa) Bilassé ZONGO, Frédéric ZONGO and Joseph I. BOUSSIM Laboratory
More informationCommodity Price Outlook & Risks
Commodity Outlook & Risks Research Department, Commodities Team January, 2 www.imf.org/commodities commodities@imf.org This monthly report presents a price outlook and risk assessment for selected commodities
More informationPre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed
DNR -533-69 PPRP - 6 Pre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed May 3 PPRP i PPRP/AARON RUN PRE-TREATMENT REPORT-MAY 3 PRE-TREATMENT WATER QUALITY IN THE AARON RUN WATERSHED PREPARED FOR:
More informationUrban Ecology: Watersheds and Aquatic Ecology A BIOBUGS program
NAME: Urban Ecology: Watersheds and Aquatic Ecology A BIOBUGS program Objective: To describe the health of the Muddy River in the Fens wetlands system of Boston by examining abiotic and biotic parameters.
More informationManaging High ph in Freshwater Ponds
SRAC Publication No. 4604 July 2008 PR VI Managing High ph in Freshwater Ponds Craig S.Tucker and Louis R. D Abramo 1 The term ph is a mathematical transformation of the hydrogen ion (H + ) concentration;
More informationPond Recirculating Production Systems
SRAC Publication No. 455 November 1997 PR VI Pond Recirculating Production Systems Andrew M. Lazur and Deborah C. Britt* Water conservation and reuse has become a major issue in aquaculture in recent years.
More informationAT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015
AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015 Product Support Matrix Following is the Product Support Matrix for the AT&T Global Network Client. See the AT&T Global Network
More informationManaging Ammonia in Fish Ponds
SRAC Publication No. 4603 December 2004 PR VI Managing Ammonia in Fish Ponds John A. Hargreaves 1 and Craig S. Tucker 2 Ammonia is toxic to fish if allowed to accumulate in fish production systems. When
More informationThe formation of polluted mine water
The formation of polluted mine water Abandoned Mine Drainage How it happens How we can fix it Bruce Golden Western PA Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation What we ll cover Brief Discussion about Mining
More informationPresented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008
Basic Nutrient Removal from Water Beta Edition Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008 Presentation Outline Salt Lake County waters / 303(d) listings
More informationOPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.
OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM ABSTRACT MIDDLEBURY, VT Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. The Middlebury Wastwater Treatment Plant, located
More information6.5 Periodic Variations in Element Properties
324 Chapter 6 Electronic Structure and Periodic Properties of Elements 6.5 Periodic Variations in Element Properties By the end of this section, you will be able to: Describe and explain the observed trends
More informationIMPACT OF CHEMICALS ADDITION IN WATER/WASTEWATER TREATMENT ON TDS CONCENTRATION AND SLUDGE GENERATION Jurek Patoczka, PhD, PE Hatch Mott MacDonald 27 Bleeker Str., Millburn, NJ 07041 (973) 912 2541 jurek.patoczka@hatchmott.com
More informationMosquito Control Guidelines
Appendix G Mosquito Control Guidelines This appendix presents the guidance for designing and maintaining stormwater treatment measures to control mosquitoes from ACCWP s Vector Control Plan. Project sponsors
More informationNitrite Poisoning or "Brown Blood" Disease- A Preventable Problem
Nitrite Poisoning or "Brown Blood" Disease- A Preventable Problem Jesse A. Chappell. Extension Fisheries Specialist, Assistant Professor, Auburn University ( 2008 ) Introduction Nitrite poisoning commonly
More informationHow To Manage Water Resources
NB: Unofficial translation; legally binding texts are those in Finnish and Swedish Ministry of the Environment, Finland Government Decree on Water Resources Management (1040/2006) Given in Helsinki on
More informationEnteric Septicemia of Catfish
Enteric Septicemia of Catfish Jesse Chappell Extension Fisheries Specialist Revised 2008 Enteric Septicemia of Catfish (ESC) has become one of the two most significant diseases of economic significance
More informationClimate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist
Climate Change A n o t h e r F a c t o r i n M a n a g i n g S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a s W a t e r R e s o u r c e s Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist USEPA-Region
More informationSand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams
Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams Stream bank erosion Poor land use practices Sources of Sand and Silt Impacts of Sand and Silt Interstitial spaces infilled Little or no flow through the streambed
More informationRECALLING Paragraph b of Article 13 of the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1974 (Helsinki Convention),
CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA HELSINKI COMMISSION - Baltic Marine HELCOM 19/98 Environment Protection Commission 15/1 Annex 3 19th Meeting Helsinki, 23-27
More informationGEOL 414/514 CARBONATE CHEMISTRY
GEOL 414/514 CARBONATE CHEMISTRY Chapter 6 LANGMUIR SOLUBILITY OF CALCITE CaCO 3 in nature: calcite & aragonite Reaction with strong acid: CaCO 3 + 2H + Ca +2 + H 2 O + CO 2 Reaction with weak acid: CaCO
More informationChesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future
Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future Bruce Michael Resource Assessment Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources The Future of Water Quality Monitoring in
More informationENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan
ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan College of Engineering, Michigan State University Spring 2007 ABSTRACT The groundwater with high level initial
More informationGRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK
GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK Although numerous papers have been written concerning the proper gradation for concrete mixes, they have generally dealt with plastic mixes, and very little published
More informationComposition of the Atmosphere. Outline Atmospheric Composition Nitrogen and Oxygen Lightning Homework
Molecules of the Atmosphere The present atmosphere consists mainly of molecular nitrogen (N2) and molecular oxygen (O2) but it has dramatically changed in composition from the beginning of the solar system.
More informationInterest rate Derivatives
Interest rate Derivatives There is a wide variety of interest rate options available. The most widely offered are interest rate caps and floors. Increasingly we also see swaptions offered. This note will
More informationCoffee prices fall but Brazilian production estimated lower
Coffee prices fall but production estimated lower Coffee prices continued their decline as speculation over the current 2015/16 crop suggests that the market has no immediate supply concerns. Indeed, one
More informationDEEP WATER MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF HYDRILLA IN WEST LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA, FLORIDA
DEEP WATER MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF HYDRILLA IN WEST LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA, FLORIDA Dean Jones 1, 2, William Haller 2 and Mike Hulon 3 1 Osceola County 2 University of Florida 3 Texas Aquatic Harvesting, Inc.
More informationCyanobacteria, Toxins and Indicators. Field Monitoring Treatment Facility Monitoring Treatment Studies
U.S. Environmental Projection Agency, Office of Research and Development Cyanobacteria, Toxins and Indicators Field Monitoring Treatment Facility Monitoring Treatment Studies Nicholas Dugan, Toby Sanan,
More informationEnvironmental Technology March/April 1998
Treating Metal Finishing Wastewater Sultan I. Amer, Ph.D. AQUACHEM INC. Environmental Technology March/April 1998 Wastewater from metal finishing industries contains high concentrations of contaminants
More informationWater Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness
Water Softening for Removal 1 in Water High concentration of calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) ions in water cause hardness Generally, water containing more than 100 mg/l of hardness expressed as calcium
More informationTHE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL
THE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL ABSTRACT Timur Deniz, Ph.D., Thomas W. Friedrich, P.E.
More informationAddressing Declining Elevations in Lake Mead
Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee July 23, 2014 Addressing Declining Elevations in Lake Mead 1 Meeting Topics Drought update Attribute finalization Interbasin Cooperation Intake Pumping Station
More informationCoordination and air quality monitoring during emergencies. Colin Powlesland Environment Agency
Coordination and air quality monitoring during emergencies Colin Powlesland Environment Agency Contents h Introduction h What do we want to achieve? h Implementation programme h Incident timeline h Proposed
More informationPamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC
Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC 3 Lakes, Reservoirs, and Ponds Forty-six states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (collectively referred to as states in the rest of this
More informationThe Main Page of RE STATS will provide the range of data at the very top of the page.
RE STATS Navigator can be accessed from Tempo under the Financials Tab at the top. It will be your bottom option under the drop down menu. The Main Page of RE STATS will provide the range of data at the
More informationEngrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5373: Professional Employers Organizations A report to the Governor and Legislature December 2010
Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5373: Professional Employers Organizations A report to the Governor and Legislature December 2010 Prepared by the Employment Security Department Budget, Performance & Research
More informationHURRICANE WORKFORCE ANALYSIS HURRICANES ANDREW AND OPAL
HURRICANE WORKFORCE ANALYSIS HURRICANES ANDREW AND OPAL Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation Labor Market Statistics September 2004 Hurricane Workforce Analysis Hurricanes Andrew & Opal Introduction
More informationBailey Lake Site Description
Bailey Lake Site Description Location Water designation number (WDN) 18-0004-00 Legal description T118N-R58W Sec. County (ies) Clark Location from nearest town 7 miles north, 1 mile west, and 1 mile north
More informationGinger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University
Effective Water Quality BMP Monitoring Tools Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University Overview BMP Monitoring Guidance Document for Stream Systems Lessons learned CEAP
More informationChassahowitzka Headspring Restoration Project ERP Appendix 1 (Dredge Plan) Revisions
Chassahowitzka Headspring Restoration Project ERP Appendix 1 (Dredge Plan) Revisions Prepared for: Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Prepared by:
More informationChapter 3. 3.3 Energy Flow in Ecosystems
Chapter 3 3.3 Energy Flow in Ecosystems Key Questions: 1) What happens to energy stored in body tissues when one organism eats another? 2) How does energy flow through an ecosystem? 3) What do the three
More informationBMP s For Pesticides In The EAA. Les Baucum University of Florida
BMP s For Pesticides In The EAA Les Baucum University of Florida What Pesticides Should We Be Concerned With? All Of them! ESPECIALLY Triazines!!!! Atrazine Ametryn Metribuzin Should we be concerned? Triazines
More informationDissolved Oxygen and Aquatic Primary Productivity1
Dissolved Oxygen and Aquatic Primary Productivity1 INTRODUCTION 2 Oxygen is critical to the maintenance of the life processes of nearly all organisms. In the aquatic environment, oxygen must be in solution
More informationClimatography of the United States No. 20 1971-2000
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 59.3 41.7 5.5 79 1962
More informationReal-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed
Real-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed Access to the data has been through a password protected site http://www.ysieconet.com/ Project Assistance: Liz McCarthy Laura Senefeld Matt Destino
More informationA NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER
A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER ABSTRACT Leonard P. Seed, M.Sc., P.Eng., Enpar Technologies Inc. * Daren D. Yetman, A.Sc.T., Enpar Technologies
More informationLecture Slides Handout
Distance Learning Program - Environmental Management http://courses.dce.harvard.edu/~environment/e101 Environmental Management ENVR E-101 - CRN 11925 Environmental Management course materials adapted for
More informationWISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION
Integrity. People. Knowledge. WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE GREEN BAY Resources. MEETING LOW LEVEL PHOSPHORUS LIMITS BY CHEMICAL ADDITION WHAT IS PHOSPHORUS Atomic # 15 Electron
More information1997-98 UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY
1997-98 UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY Daria G. Mochan Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory Division Biomonitoring Section 1712 S.W. Eleventh Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201
More informationActive Treatment Systems
Categories EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TC Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control Legend: Primary Category
More informationClimatography of the United States No. 20 1971-2000
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: SAN Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 65.8 49.7 57.8
More informationThe economics of micro-algae production
The economics of micro-algae production and processing into biofuel December 2006 Thomas Schulz Research Economist Farming Systems, Department of Agriculture Western Australia Key Message The Research
More informationRemoving Heavy Metals from Wastewater
Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater Engineering Research Center Report David M. Ayres Allen P. Davis Paul M. Gietka August 1994 1 2 Removing Heavy Metals From Wastewater Introduction This manual provides
More informationCoagulation and Flocculation
Coagulation and Flocculation Groundwater and surface water contain both dissolved and suspended particles. Coagulation and flocculation are used to separate the suspended solids portion from the water.
More informationHonors Chemistry: Unit 6 Test Stoichiometry PRACTICE TEST ANSWER KEY Page 1. A chemical equation. (C-4.4)
Honors Chemistry: Unit 6 Test Stoichiometry PRACTICE TEST ANSWER KEY Page 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Question What is a symbolic representation of a chemical reaction? What 3 things (values) is a mole of a chemical
More informationSilica Over-Saturation, Precipitation, Prevention and Remediation In Hot Water Systems Edited By Dave Peairs, Cal Water, Technical Director
Silica Over-Saturation, Precipitation, Prevention and Remediation In Hot Water Systems Edited By Dave Peairs, Cal Water, Technical Director Background Silica scaling becomes a problem when any hot water
More informationJOCASSEE FOREBAY AND TAILWATER WATER QUALITY REPORT KEOWEE-TOXAWAY PROJECT (FERC PROJECT NO. 2503)
JOCASSEE FOREBAY AND TAILWATER WATER QUALITY REPORT KEOWEE-TOXAWAY PROJECT (FERC PROJECT NO. 2503) Prepared for: Prepared by: DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NC RESERVOIR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,
More informationExperimental Analysis
Experimental Analysis Instructors: If your institution does not have the Fish Farm computer simulation, contact the project directors for information on obtaining it free of charge. The ESA21 project team
More informationReport for September 2015
Report for tember 2015 Issued tember 30, 2015 National Association of Credit Management Combined Sectors So much for that hoped for pattern of one bad month followed by a good one. This month s CMI is
More informationCoffee year 2014/15 ends with prices at 20-month low
Coffee year 2014/15 ends with prices at 20-month low The coffee market slumped further in September, following a slight rally in August, with the weakness of the real and peso again proving the most influential
More informationCOMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) 2 Fixed Rates Variable Rates FIXED RATES OF THE PAST 25 YEARS AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDING RATE - 5 YEAR* (Per cent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
More informationCOMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) 2 Fixed Rates Variable Rates FIXED RATES OF THE PAST 25 YEARS AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDING RATE - 5 YEAR* (Per cent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
More informationPrepared for: Prepared by: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC Canada) November 2012 CM002171 PROPRIETARY
Annual Report for 211-212 Prepared for: Natural Resources Canada Ressources naturelles Canada Prepared by: November 212 CM2171 Third Party Use Statement of Limitations This report has been prepared for
More information