May 2014 Test Administration

Transcription

1 Page 1 Rhode Island s ECAP Science Results for Students in Grades 4, 8, and 11 May Test Administration Deborah A. Gist, Commissioner Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 255 Westminster Street Providence, RI (401) [v ]

2 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Page 1 The ew England Common Assessment Program (ECAP) Science Assessment is the result of collaboration among ew Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont to build a set of tests for grades 3 through 8 and 11 to meet the requirements of the o Child Left Behind Act (CLB). The purposes of the ECAP Science tests are as follows: (1) provide data on student achievement in science at grades 4, 8, and 11 to meet the requirements of CLB; (2) provide information to support program evaluation and improvement; and (3) provide information regarding student and school performance to both parents and the public. The tests are constructed to meet rigorous technical criteria, to include universal design elements and accommodations to allow all students access to test content, and to gather reliable student demographic information for accurate reporting. It is important to note that ECAP results are provided to districts, schools, and families for use as one piece of evidence about progress and learning that occurred on the respective grade-span expectations (Gs) of elementary (K-4), middle (5-8) and high schools (9-11). In September we received the preliminary results from our testing company, and we shared these results with each school district for local review. At that time, Commissioner Gist raised concerns about the results, particularly in grade 8, and several school superintendents noted that some of their otherwise high-performing students received zero credit on some test items. To ensure that the results were accurate, RIDE decided to undertake a review of the science assessments and of the scoring process and to hold off on release of the assessment results until we completed this review. The results of this review demonstrated the assessment itself and the scoring process met all technical requirements needed to report accurate results. RIDE did, however, find a couple of items on the science assessment for grades 4 and grade 8 that were borderline in meeting these requirements. These items are included in the part of the assessment known as the inquiry task. The inquiry task asks students to design or critique scientific investigations, to analyze data, and to draw conclusions or explanations. Examples of these inquiry tasks can be found on the RIDE website, under practice tests, on this page: Upon review of both the items and student responses used as scoring benchmarks RIDE found: The wording on some of the items was unclear and could have led to an incorrect student response. A small percentage of students who received zero points on the inquiry task should have received partial credit. Caution should be taked when reviewing scores on the inquiry task of individual students who took the assessment in grade 4 or grade 8 and with in districts and schools with a small number of students. However, the overall scores and proficiency levels are accurate at the state level.

3 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Page 2 OTE 1: The ew England Common Assessment Program (ECAP) Science Assessment is the result of collaboration among ew Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont to build a set of tests for grades 3 through 8 and 11 to meet the requirements of the o Child Left Behind Act (CLB). The purposes of the ECAP Science tests are as follows: (1) provide data on student achievement in science at grades 4, 8, and 11 to meet the requirements of CLB; (2) provide information to support program evaluation and improvement; and (3) provide information regarding student and school performance to both parents and the public. The tests are constructed to meet rigorous technical criteria, to include universal design elements and accommodations to allow all students access to test content, and to gather reliable student demographic information for accurate reporting. It is important to note that ECAP results are provided to districts, schools, and families for use as one piece of evidence about progress and learning that occurred on the respective grade-span expectations (Gs) of elementary (K-4), middle (5-8) and high schools (9-11). OTE 2: Throughout this report, statistical significance is reported to indicate whether reported differences (e.g., increases or decreases in the percentage of students achieving proficiency or higher) in this year s ECAP results are significantly different from results reported in previous years. For each table presented in this report, please note the key to determine the meaning of color-coded cells. In general, if a cell is colored green, then the reported difference indicates that the percentage of students achieving proficiency or higher, for example, is statistically significantly higher than previous results whereas if the cell is red, then the reported difference indicates that the percentage of students achieving proficiency or higher is statistically significantly lower than previous results. All other reported differences are thus not considered statistically significant, regardless of how large or small they appear to be. Please see Appendix B for a full discussion on how statistical significance was calculated and how to interpret statistical significance. OTE 3: Throughout this report, the percentage of students scoring Proficient or higher refers to the cumulative percentage of students scoring at the Proficient and Proficient with Distinction levels of achievement. See Appendix A for descriptions of each of the levels. OTE 4: Multiple data points are needed for trend analysis. A single year s test results provide limited information about a school or district. As with any evaluation, test results are most meaningful when compared with other indicators and when examined over several years for long-term trends in student performance. This is especially true in small schools where changes in student cohorts from year to year can have a noticeable influence on test results. Because measures of student achievement often change incrementally over short periods of time, RIDE presents most state-, district-, and schoollevel results in this report as a series of multiple-year views in order to reveal achievement trends that have occurred over several years. In addition, RIDE presents last year s results to illustrate a one-year view. In general, over the seven-year period between and, a statistically significant increase indicates improvement that has been sustained. Conversely, a statistically significant decrease indicates a sustained decline in achievement.

4 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results P age 3 TABLE OF COTETS Executive Summary... 3 Section 1: Statewide Results Rhode Island Statewide Comparisons by Grade Level... 5 ECAP State Comparisons Student Group Performance... 7 Achievement Gaps Grade 8 AEP Science Results Section 2: District Results Percent of Students at/above Proficient by District and School Level Section 3: School Results Percent of Students at/above Proficient by School Appendices Appendix A. Glossary of Terms Appendix B. Calculating Standard Error ( ) School Level in this report refers to Elementary, Middle, and High School.

5 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results P age 4 E EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The seventh administration of the Science ew England Common Assessment Program (ECAP) tests took place May 5-22,. A total of 30,794 Rhode Island public school students in grades four, eight, and eleven participated in ECAP Science test. STATE-LEVEL test revealed thatt at the state level, 2 roughly 32 percent of all Rhode Island public school students were proficient or above in science (down 2 percentage points from the May administration). While all three tested grades had significantly higher percentages of students achieving proficiency compared to the first administration of the science test back in, none posted gains in compared to. Scores for students in grades 4 and 11 were essentially the same as last year while grade 8 students posted a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of students scoring in the Proficient and Proficient with Distinction categories. Since the first administration of the ECAP Science Assessment back in, Rhode Island has seen the largest growth in student achievement at all grade levels among the ECAP states. In, Rhode RESULTS Overall Achievement Results of the spring ECAP Science Island s 4 th graders scores remained constant compared to last year while their peers in ew Hampshire and Vermont posted a 5 and 3 percentage point decrease respectively in the percent achieving proficiency or above. Results indicate, however, that Rhode Island s 4 th graders still lag behind their peers in both ew Hampshire and Vermont. Results at grade 8 indicate that ew Hampshire and Vermont students out-perform Rhode Island s 8 th graders by 2 and 2 percentage points respectively while at grade 11, the gap between our students and their peers in both ew Hampshire and Vermont has been eliminated. For the first time, Rhode Island s 11 th graders have out-performed their peers in ew Hampshire and equaled the performance e of their peers in Vermont. Achievement Gaps 3 Statewide (all grades combined), the achievement gaps in Science between IEP and on-iep students LEP and on-lep students, and between Low-Income andd on-low Income students narrowed this year. However, all gaps at all grade levels are notably wider than they were back in. The only exception is the gap between Low-Income points from - to. By comparison, other grade-level gaps and on-low Income students in grade 4, which has only widened by about 2 percentage have 2 All grades combined for a single aggregated result. 3 An achievement gap is a difference in what distinct groups of students know and can do in important subjects such as reading, math, or science. One way we find achievement gaps is by comparing test performances of different groups of students. One way we describe gaps is by subtracting the average of a lower scoring group from the average of f a higher scoringg group.

6 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results P age 5 widened by about 5 percentage points (e.g., Gr. 8 IEP/on-IEP in grade 11 and low-income students in grade 11 were the only students to post significant gains in compared to last year. However, compared to the very first administration of the ECAP Science assessment back in nearly all student groups posted significant gains in. The only group to post a significant decrease from to was 4 th grade students with IEPs, who performed 7 percentage points lower. gap) to more than 14 percentage points ( e.g., Gr. 11 LEP/on-LEPP gap. In terms of overall performance, Hispanic students 4 DISTRICT RESULTS Compared to last year s results, there was very little change at the district level in in terms of student achievement in Science. When all grades are combined to derive a single overall proficiency rate for the entire district, none of Rhode Island s districts posted a significant gain in Sciencee while 5 posted a significant decrease in overall student performance. For all other districts, scores were essentially the same as last year. By comparison, 21 districts posted significant gains in science this year compared to their performance e on the very first administration off the ECAP Science test back in. SCHOOL RESULTSS Results at the school level mirrored those of district level in that for the vast majority, Science results were not significantly different than last year s. A total of 4 schools (all of which are high schools) posted significant increases in the percentage of studentss achieving proficiency or above in Science while 20 posted significant decreases in. Over the seven-year period from to, a total of 54 schoolss made gains while only 4 schools had lower percentages. COCLUSIO While Rhode Island had a 2 percentage point decrease overall in the percentage of students who achieved Proficient or above on the ECAP Science test, there are some notable pieces of good news: Rhode Island s 4 th graders scored 5 percentage points higher in than in whereas their peers in ew Hampshire and Vermont scored 5 andd 4 percentage points lower over the same time period. 4 Throughout this report, the term district is used as an inclusive identifier of both traditional districts and charter schools, both of which are Local Education Agencies or LEAs.

7 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Page 6 Rhode Island s 8 th graders scored 4 percentage points higher in than in whereas their peers in ew Hampshire and Vermont scored 1 and 2 percentage points lower over the same time period. Rhode Island s 11 th graders scored 14 percentage points higher in than in whereas their peers in ew Hampshire and Vermont scored 7 and 5 percentage points higher over the same time period. For the first time, Rhode Island s 11 th graders have out-performed their peers in ew Hampshire and equaled the performance of their peers in Vermont. Rhode Island s 11 th grade Low-Income students scored significantly higher this year than last year. Rhode Island s 11 th grade Hispanic students scored significantly higher this year than last year. Four Rhode Island high schools performed significantly higher than last year and two of those high schools (orth Kingstown Senior High School and orth Smithfield High School) have also made significant gains since.

8 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results STATE-LEVEL RESULTS Table 1. ECAP Science Statewide Results by Achievement Level. Grade SBP PP P PwD ALL th Total SBP PP P PwD Total SBP PP P PwD Total Total Differencee Total Difference th th Key (see Appendix A for performance level descriptors) SBP = Substantially Below Proficient PP = Partially Proficient P = Proficient PwD = Proficient with Distinction Total = P + PwD = Standard error (see Appendix B) = Statistically significant decrease in percent of students proficient or above = Statistically significant increase in percent of students proficient or above = o statistically significant difference between comparison years Figure 1. ECAP Science Statewide Results: - Grade-Level Comparisons.

9 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Table 2. to ECAP State Comparisons: Grade 4 Students 5 Testing Year Grade 4 Rhode Island ew Hampshire Vermont to Change Table 3. to ECAP State Comparisons: Grade 8 Students 6 Testing Year Grade 8 Rhode Island ew Hampshire Vermont to Change Table 4. to ECAP State Comparisons: Grade 11 Students 7 Testing Year Grade 11 Rhode Island ew Hampshire Vermont to Change All percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 6 All percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 7 All percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

10 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Table 5. Statewide Student Group Percent Proficient in Science: to. Student Group Prof. Prof. Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 11 Prof. Total Proficient Difference: - Total Proficient Difference: - Prof. Prof. Prof. Total Proficient Difference: - Total Proficient Difference: - Prof. Prof. Prof. Total Proficient Difference: - STATE AVERAGE Males Females IEP on-iep LEP LEP Monitored on-lep Low Income on-low Income American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White = Statistically significant decrease in percent of students proficient or above = Statistically significant increase in percent of students proficient or above = o statistically significant difference between comparison years Total Proficient Difference: -

11 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Figure 2. Grade 4 Student Group Performance: RACE/ETHICITY Percent Proficient State Average American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Figure 3. Grade 8 Student Group Performance: RACE/ETHICITY Percent Proficient State Average American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Figure 4. Grade 11 Student Group Performance: RACE/ETHICITY Percent Proficient State Average American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White

12 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results Figure 5. Grade 4 Student Group Performance: IEP, LEP, LE Percent Proficient EP MOITORED, LOW ICOME State Average IEP LEP LEP Monitored Low Income Figure 6. Grade 8 Student Group Performance: IEP, LEP, LE 35 EP MOITORED, LOW ICOME 30 Percent Proficient State Average IEP LEP LEP Monitored Econ Disadvantaged Figure7. Grade 11 Student Group Performance: IEP, LEP, L 35 LEP MOITORED, LOW ICOME Percent Proficient State Average IEP LEP LEP Monitored Econ Disadvantaged

13 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results SCIECEE ACHIEVEMET GAP DATA: Table 6. Student Group 8 Percent Proficient Achievement Gaps 9 on the ECAP SCIECE Test: to. Grade IEP : on-iep Gap LEP : on-lep Gap Low-Income : on-low Income Gap Statewide th th th Table 7. Student Group Scale Score 11 Achievement Gaps on the ECAP SCIECE Test: to. Grade IEP : on-iep Gap LEP : on-lep Gap Low-Income : on-low Income Gap th th th Eligibility for free or reduced price meal benefits through the ational School Lunch Program is the most commonly used indicator of economic disadvantage. 9 An achievement gap is a difference in what distinct groups of students know and can do in important subjects such as reading or math. One way we find achievement gaps is by comparing test scores for groups of students. One way we describee gaps is by subtracting the average of a lower scoring group from the average of a higher scoring group. 10 Statewide = all grades combined. 11 Becausee scale scores differ across grades, it is not possible to create an aggregated state scale score for comparison purposes in this table.

14 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results GRAD E 8 AEP S SCIECE RESULTS: AD 2011 Table 8. Statewide Grade 8 Student Group Percent Proficient in AEP Science: 2009 to Student Group STATE AVERAGE 26 Males Females IEP on-iep LEP LEP Moni on-lep Low Incom on-low American Asian Black Hispanic White Prof itored - 26 me 9 Income 36 n Indian Grade 8 Prof Total Difference: In this section, overall AEP Science results for Rhode Island s 8 th grade students are reported along with w results from the other ew England states. Results are reported as the percentages of students performing relativee to performancee standards set by the ational Assessment Governing Board. The percentages are estimates based on samples of studentss rather than on entire populations. Therefore, comparisons between years are based on statistical tests that consider both the size of the differences and the standard errorss of the two statistics being compared. In both 2009 and 2011, approximately 2,300 8 th gradee students in Rhode Island weree assessed in AEP science. The percentagee of Rhode Island students who performed at or above Proficient increased 5 points from 26 in 2009 up to 31 in While Rhode Island s 2011 performance was not significantly different from the reported national average (31 percent) that year, it did represent a trend of improvementt in sciencee achievement for Rhode Island s students. This trend is mirrored in the performance on ECAP Sciencee over the years where studentss in grades 4, 8,, and 11 have continued to improve since the first administration of this assessment back in. = Statistically significant decrease in percent of students proficient or above = Statistically significant increasee in percent of studentss proficient or above = o statistically significant difference between comparison years OTE: Differences in proficient between 2009 and reflect statistical analysis using unrounded figures and may therefore deviate from calculations using the figures above. Table to 2011 percent of 8 th grade students at/above Proficient: AEP Science results byy state. Testing Year Grade 8 Rhode Island ew Hampshire Vermont Maine Massachusetts Connecticut Change = Statistically significant decrease in percent of students proficient or above = Statistically significant increasee in percent of studentss proficient or above = o statistically significant difference between comparison years OTE: Differences in proficient between 2009 and reflect statistical analysis using unrounded figures and may therefore deviate from calculations using the figures above.

15 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results DISTRICT RESULTS Table 10. Percent of Students At/Above Proficient in Science by District and School Level. District Barringtonn Beacon Charter Blackstone Academy Blackstone Valley Prep Bristol-Warren Burrillville Central Falls Chariho Coventry Cranston Cumberland Davies Career and Tech. DCYF School Level Elementary Middle High High High Elementary Middle Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High High High Difference: Difference:

16 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Level Difference: - Difference: - East Greenwich Elementary Middle High East Providence Elementary Middle High Exeter-West Greenwich Elementary Middle High Foster Elementary Foster-Glocester Middle High Glocester Elementary Highlander Elementary Middle International Elementary Jamestown Elementary Middle Johnston Elementary Middle High Kingston Hill Elementary Lincoln Elementary Middle High Little Compton Elementary Middle MET Career & Tech. High Middletown Elementary Middle High arragansett Elementary Middle High

17 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Level Difference: - Difference: - ew Shoreham Elementary High ewport Elementary Middle High orth Kingstown Elementary Middle High orth Providence Elementary Middle High orth Smithfield Elementary Middle High Paul Cuffee Elementary Middle High Pawtucket Elementary Middle High Portsmouth Elementary Middle High Providence Elementary Middle High RI urses Institute High RI Sch. for the Deaf Elementary Middle High Scituate Elementary Middle High Segue Institute Middle

18 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Level Difference: - Difference: - Sheila Skip owell High School 19 Smithfield Elementary Middle High South Kingstown Elementary Middle High The Compass School Elementary Middle The Greene School High The Learning Community Elementary Middle Tiverton Elementary Middle High Trinity Academy Middle Urban Collaborative Middle Warwick Elementary Middle High West Warwick Elementary Middle High Westerly Elementary Middle High Woonsocket Elementary Middle High STATE Elementary Middle High Key = Statistically significant decrease in total percent of students proficient or above = Standard error (see Appendix B) = Statistically significant increase in total percent of students proficient or above = umber of students tested = o statistically significant difference between comparison years total percent of students proficient or above Blank = <10 and/or Proficient is <1

19 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results SCHOOL RESULTS Table 11. Percent of Students At/Above Proficient in Science by School. Barringtonn Beacon Charter School Blackstone Academy Blackstone Valley Prep Bristol-Warren Burrillville Central Falls Chariho District Hampden Meadows ES Barrington MS Barrington HS Beacon Charter HS Blackstone Academy Charter HS Blackstone Valley Prep ES Blackstone Valley Prep MS Colt Andrews ES Guiteras ES Hugh Cole ES Rockwell ES Kickemuit MS Mount Hope HS Steere Farm ES W. L. Callahan ES Burrillville MS Burrillville HS Ella Risk ES Veterans Memorial ES Dr. E. F. Calcutt MS Central Falls Sr. HS Ashaway ES Charlestown ES Hope Valley ES Richmond ES Chariho Regional MS The R.Y.S.E. School (gr. 8) Chariho Regional HS School Difference: Difference:

20 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: - Difference: - The R.Y.S.E. School (gr. 11) Coventry Blackrock ES Hopkins Hill ES Tiogue ES Washington Oak ES Western Coventry ES A. S. Feinstein MS Coventry HS Cranston Arlington ES Chester W. Barrows ES Daniel D. Waterman ES Eden Park ES Edgewood Highland ES Edward S. Rhodes ES Garden City ES George J. Peters ES Gladstone Street ES Glen Hills ES Hope Highlands ES Oak Lawn ES Orchard Farms ES Stadium ES Stone Hill ES William R. Dutemple ES Woodridge ES Hugh B. Bain MS Park View MS Western Hills MS Cranston HS East Cranston HS West EL/CPS Career Acad. HS Cumberland Ashton ES B.F. orton ES Community ES Garvin Memorial ES J. J. McLaughlin Cumberland Hill ES Joseph L. McCourt MS orth Cumberland MS Cumberland HS

21 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: - Difference: - Davies Career-Tech. William M. Davies Jr. Career-Technical HS DCYF DCYF Alternate Education Program HS East Greenwich George Hanaford ES James H. Eldredge ES Archie R. Cole MS East Greenwich HS East Providence Agnes B. Hennessey ES Alice M. Waddington ES Emma G. Whiteknact ES James R. D. Oldham ES Kent Heights ES Myron J. Francis ES Orlo Avenue ES Silver Spring ES Edward R. Martin MS Riverside MS East Providence HS Exeter-West Greenwich Metcalf ES Exeter-West Greenwich MS Exeter-West Greenwich HS Foster Captain Isaac Paine ES Foster-Glocester Ponaganset MS Ponaganset HS Glocester Fogarty Memorial ES West Glocester ES Highlander Highlander Charter (gr. 4) Highlander Charter (gr. 8) International Charter School International Charter ES Jamestown Jamestown-Melrose ES Jamestown-Lawn MS Johnston Brown Avenue ES Sarah Dyer Barnes ES Thornton ES Winsor Hill ES icholas A. Ferri MS Johnston Senior HS

22 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: - Difference: - Kingston Hill Academy Kingston Hill Academy ES Lincoln Lincoln Central ES Lonsdale ES orthern Lincoln ES Saylesville ES Lincoln MS Lincoln Senior HS Little Compton Wilbur & McMahon (gr. 4) Wilbur & McMahon (gr. 8) MET Career & Technical Center Metropolitan Regional Career & Tech. Center HS Middletown J. H. Gaudet Learning Academy ES J. H. Gaudet MS Middletown HS arragansett arragansett ES arragansett Pier MS arragansett HS ew Shoreham Block Island (gr. 4) Block Island (gr. 8 and 11) ewport Claiborne Pell ES Coggeshall ES Cranston - Calvert ES Dr. M. H. Sullivan ES W. J. Underwood ES Frank E. Thompson MS Rogers HS orth Kingstown Fishing Cove ES Forest Park ES Hamilton ES Stony Lane ES S. M. Henseler Quidnessett ES Davisville MS Wickford MS orth Kingstown Senior HS orth Providence Centredale ES

23 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: -. Providence (continued) Dr. Joseph A. Whelan ES Greystone ES James L. McGuire ES Marieville ES Stephen Olney ES Birchwood MS Dr. Edward A. Ricci MS orth Providence HS orth Smithfield Dr. H. L. Halliwell Memorial ES orth Smithfield MS orth Smithfield HS Paul Cuffee Charter School Paul Cuffee Charter (gr. 4) Paul Cuffee Charter (gr. 8) Paul Cuffee Charter (gr. 11) Pawtucket Agnes E. Little ES Curvin-McCabe ES Elizabeth Baldwin ES Fallon Memorial ES Flora S. Curtis Memorial ES Francis J. Varieur ES Henry J. Winters ES M. Virginia Cunningham ES athanael Greene ES Potter-Burns ES Goff MS Joseph Jenks MS Samuel Slater MS Jacqueline M. Walsh HS for the Perf. & Vis. Arts Charles E. Shea Senior HS William E. Tolman Senior HS Portsmouth Portsmouth MS (gr. 4) Portsmouth MS (gr. 8) Portsmouth HS Providence Alan Shawn Feinstein ES Alfred Lima, Sr. ES Anthony Carnevale ES Asa Messer ES Difference: -

24 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: - Difference: - Providence (continued) Carl G. Lauro ES Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. ES Frank D. Spaziano ES George J. West ES Harry Kizirian ES Leviton Dual Language ES Lillian Feinstein ES, Sackett St Mary E. Fogarty ES Pleasant View ES Reservoir Avenue ES Robert F. Kennedy ES Robert L Bailey IV, ES The Sgt. Cornel Young and C. Woods ES Times2 Academy (gr. 4) Vartan Gregorian ES Veazie Street ES Webster Avenue ES William D'Abate ES Esek Hopkins MS Gilbert Stuart MS Governor Christopher DelSesto MS athan Bishop MS athanael Greene MS Roger Williams MS Times2 Academy (gr. 8) Academy for Career Exploration (ACES) HS Central HS Classical HS Dr. Jorge Alvarez HS E-Cubed Acad. HS Hope HS Mount Pleasant HS Providence Career & Tech. Academy HS Times2 Academy (gr. 11) W. B. Cooley Senior HS Rhode Island urses Institute RI urses Institute Middle College Charter HS Rhode Island School for the Deaf RI School for the Deaf (gr. 4) RI School for the Deaf (gr. 8) RI School for the Deaf (gr. 11) Scituate Clayville ES

25 Rhode Island ECAP Science Results District School Difference: - Difference: - Scituate (continued) Hope ES orth Scituate ES Scituate MS Scituate HS Segue Institute Segue Institute for Learning MS Sheila Skip owell Leadership Academy 19 S. S. owell Leadership Academy I 11 S. S. owell Leadership Academy II 8 Smithfield Anna M. McCabe ES Old County Road ES Raymond C. LaPerche ES William Winsor ES Vincent J. Gallagher MS Smithfield Senior HS South Kingstown Matunuck ES Peace Dale ES Wakefield ES West Kingston ES Curtis Corner MS South Kingstown HS The Compass School The Compass School (gr. 4) The Compass School (gr. 8) The Greene School The Greene School HS The Learning Community The Learning Community (gr. 4) The LearningCommunity (gr. 8) Tiverton Fort Barton ES Pocasset ES Walter E. Ranger ES Tiverton MS Tiverton HS Trinity Academy Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts MS Urban Collaborative Urban Collaborative Accelerated Program MS Warwick Cedar Hill ES Cottrell F. Hoxsie ES E. G. Robertson ES Francis ES Greenwood ES Harold F. Scott ES