Asset Management Plan

Transcription

1 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 The Town of Aurora Asset Management Plan T own of Aurora

2 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 2 Town of Aurora Infrastructure Assets... 2 Development of an Asset Management Plan... 3 Benefits Associated with an Asset Management Plan... 3 Asset Management Plan s Impact on Planning and Financial Budgeting... 4 Implementation and Evaluation of Asset Management Plan... 4 Implementation Schedule... 5 Infrastructure and Environmental Services Asset Scope... 6 Asset Management Framework... 7 Setting Direction for Asset Management... 8 Key Linkages to the Corporate Strategic Plan... 8 Town of Aurora s Asset Management Policy... 9 Expected Levels of Service Understanding the User Groups Water Services Wastewater Services Stormwater System Roads Services Solid Waste Services Facilities Services Fleet Services Parks Services Town of Aurora

3 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Urban Forestry Services External Trends or Issues Current Performance Relative to Target Performance State of Local Infrastructure Asset Inventory and Valuation Asset Condition and Performance Assessment Asset Rating Summary Asset Management Strategy - Needs Analysis Future Demands and gap analysis Operations and Maintenance Strategy Overview of Risks Associated with Strategy Option Analysis Financing Strategy - Program Development Operations Plan and Financial Strategy Capital Plan and Financial Strategy Risk Management Expenditure Analysis Revenue Analysis Key Assumptions Program Delivery Project Procurement Effectiveness Review Continuous Improvement Strategy Appendix 1 Asset Management Strategies Town of Aurora

4 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Roads Watermain Systems Wastewater Systems Stormwater Systems & Culverts Facilities Vehicles Machinery & Equipment Land, Parkland & Land Rehabilitation / Improvements Urban Forestry & Street Trees Appendix 2 Asset Inventory Report Roads Pavement and Curbs Sidewalks & Paths Street Luminaires Signage Watermain Systems Watermains Watermain Valves Hydrants Water Booster Stations Wastewater Systems Sanitary Sewers Maintenance Chambers Sanitary Pumping Stations Stormwater Systems & Culverts Town of Aurora

5 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Storm Sewers Maintenance Chambers Catchbasins Drain Collector Sewers Storm Water Management Ponds Bridges & Culverts Continuous Deflective Separation & Oil-Grit SEPARATOR Units Headwalls Appendix 3 - Detailed 10-Year Financial Forecast for Infrastructure Assets Appendix 4-18 Year Vehicle/Equipment Replacement Schedule IES Operations Vehicle Replacement Schedule 2006 to Parks/IES FACILITIES Vehicle/Equipment Replacement Schedule to Appendix 5 - Asset Management Related Software Workplace Asset Management System (WAMS): Maximo Geographic Information System: ESRI ArcGIS Reference information Management: Drawings Database Automated Vehicle Location (AVL): Interfleet Condition Assessment Tools Future Projects Town of Aurora

6 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In response to the Ministry of Infrastructure s release of a ten year infrastructure plan, Building Together, which focuses on building a more standardized and consistent approach to municipal asset management planning, the Town of Aurora (the Town or Aurora ) has taken a pro-active approach in preparing a detailed Asset Management Plan, AMP, to seek provincial capital funding. As the Township s municipal assets continue to age, it becomes increasingly important to go through a formal process determining how a group of assets is to be managed over a period of time to help ensure safety standards, regulations and expected levels of service continue to be met given the Town s financing capabilities. The AMP is a strategic document stating the characteristics and condition of infrastructure assets, levels of service expected from them, planned actions to ensure the assets are providing the expected level of service and financing strategies to implement the planned actions. The overall intent of the AMP is to help the Town ensure investments are made at the right time, future repair and rehabilitation costs are minimized, and municipal assets are being appropriately maintained. 1 P age Town of Aurora

7 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 INTRODUCTION Public Infrastructure is central to our prosperity and our quality of life. The Province of Ontario released in June 2011, Building Together, a long-term infrastructure plan for Ontario that responds to the far-reaching trends that will affect Ontario s infrastructure needs including a more global and service-oriented economy, a larger, older and more urbanized population and the effects of a changing climate. The plan sets out a strategic framework that will guide future investments in ways that support economic growth, are fiscally responsible and respond to changing needs. A key element to this framework is ensuring good stewardship through proper asset management. Despite significant investments by all levels of government, more needs to be done to address current and emerging municipal infrastructure needs. The province of Ontario will work together with local municipalities and the federal government to establish a municipal infrastructure strategy. The Town of Aurora, like all other municipalities throughtout Ontario and Canada, deliver many of the services that are critical to its residents, and these services rely on well-planned, well-built and well-maintained infrastructure. The Town s Asset Management Plan will address the challenges of current and and future infrastructure needs and guide financial and investment decisions. Town of Aurora Asset Management Plan ( AMP ) sets out the organization s approach to reviewing and managing its active capital assets, to ensure continued and sustainable operations, operating and service capability of each asset, and the necessary financial plan to ensure that the required investments can be made when expected. Aurora s Asset Management Plan is an outcome of the Town s stewardship responsibilities: how we plan to look after what we have. However, the Town has also incorporated future growth and future asset investments into the plan to document what new assets we plan to invest in as the community grows, and how we plan to finance those investments. The growth side of the plan also becomes an input into the existing asset replacement side of the plan, as the new assets begin to require replacement, sometimes within the same 10-year period, such as for new fleet vehicle additions. The primary objective of an AMP is to maximize benefits, control risks, and provide a satisfactory level of service to the community in a sustainable manner. Infrastructure management ensures that the Town is capable of providing the desired level of service to support attaining our ultimate goals. TOWN OF AURORA INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS The Town is responsible for the following asset classes: water and wastewater, stormwater management, roads, facilities, fleet, machinery and equipment, land, parkland and land improvements. Infrastructure and Environmental Services ( IES ) is responsible for the largest group of Town s asset classes which include water and wastewater, stormwater management, roads, facilities, fleet and machinery while Parks and Recreation Services is responsible for land, parkland, land improvements and fitness equipment. These infrastructure assets present particular challenges where financing can be large and timing for renewal can cause significant peaks and troughs in expenditures. 2 P age Town of Aurora

8 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 DEVELOPMENT OF AN ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN The Town has hired an external third party to help assist in preparing the AMP. Town staff worked extensively on the plan and the plan was also complemented by various other departments utilizing the 10 year capital plan forecast. The Town s Departments involved in developing the AMP are: 1. Infrastructure and Environmental Services Engineering Division Operations Division Facilities and Fleet Division 2. Parks nd Recreation Services Parks Division 3. Corporate and Financial Services Finance Division The AMP covers a ten year period and used the following resources: Ten Year Capital Investment Plan with 2013 Capital Budget Road Needs Study completed in October 2010 and to be updated in 2015 (The Roads Need Study is typically updated every 5 years) Repair and Maintenance Budget The Corporation of the Town of Aurora PSAB 3150 Compliance Report The Corporation of thetown of Aurora Audited Financial Statements (payment certificates) 18-Year IES Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Schedule to 2028 Town of Aurora Pavement Management System, October 2010 IES Operations Vehicle Replacement Schedule Town of Aurora Tangible Capital Asset Policies The Economic Value of Natural Capital Assets Report June 2013 BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Specific benefits associated with an AMP include: Better decision making regarding resource allocation; More effective communications with ratepayers, elected officials, financial rating organizations and regulatory agencies; Providing consistent levels of service to the public; Better risk management practices to the municipality; More effective financial planning; Reduced lifecycle costs; More efficient data management; Facilitates the establishment and subsequent implementation of policy objectives and the related measurement of performance; Avoids potential problems and crises; and Results in positive institutional change. 3 P age Town of Aurora

9 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN S IMPACT ON PLANNING AND FINANCIAL BUDGETING Planning and financial budgeting for previous periods have been constructed using the same input factors used in development of the AMP. Conversely, the AMP lays out data in a more concise document and takes into account the financial impact. Ultimately, the AMP will assist in formulating long-term planning. The AMP has a significant impact on the planning and financial budgeting process, which are dependent on each other. The AMP identifies the timing for asset renewal, asset maintenance, asset replacement, additions and/or disposals and the associated costs. This directly ties into the planning and financial budgeting by providing the knowledge of the timing and magnitude of future investments required to operate, maintain, renew and acquire assets. While the AMP clearly outlines the timing and costs to maintain infrastructure assets at a certain level and condition, the capital and operating budgets ensure the acquisition and management of assets is linked to council goals and strategies, community service expectations growth and demand projects, asset life-cycle management, and operating and maintenance programs. In addition, the AMP will outline any funding shortfalls or additional funds required to be raised to maintain assets at desirable conditions. IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon completion, the AMP will be reviewed with Council and Staff. As new information becomes available through changes in budgets, maintenance work changing the life of an asset, and new engineering studies are completed, the AMP will be updated. Any changes in the financial picture, including tax levy changes, debt funding increases or decreases, etc., the AMP will be updated to reflect these changes. The desire is to make the AMP a rolling 10 year document by adding on annually an updated year 10 to replace the then historical first year of the plan. The timing for asset renewal, asset maintenance, asset replacement, additions and/or disposals will be re-visited by Council and Staff once every four years (Council term). The orignal ten year period covered by the Town s AMP commences on January 1, 2014 and concludes on December 31, P age Town of Aurora

10 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The plan would be to have a continuous rolling 10 year Asset Management Plan. The plan will be used to consolidate all of the input data currently being used, along with the addition of the financing component. Goals/ Actions Description Planned Implementation Date Completion of first draft of Town AMP Peer assessment of draft AMP by 3 rd Party Finalization of final version of AMP Obtain senior management approval of AMP Obtain Council approval of AMP Update of AMPs ten year capital investment plan Town staff to draft the corporation s first version of its AMP. 3 rd party to complete assessment of draft AMP and provide feedback for improving it Town staff to complete final version of the Corporation s AMP for senior management and council review and approval AMP will be presented to senior management for its final review and approval AMP will be present e to council for its review and approval On an on-going basis the ten year capital asset investment plan will be reviewed and updated Current Status Expected Implementation Date April 30, 2014 Complete April 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 Complete June 30, 2014 November 30, 2014 Ongoing November 30, 2014 December 15, 2014 December 15, 2014 January 20, 2015 January 20, 2015 Ongoing; Spring of each year 5 P age Town of Aurora

11 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ASSET SCOPE As stated above, IES, Parks and Recreation are responsible for the following asset classes: Functional Area Asset Classes Water and Wastewater Water mains Water pumping stations Wastewater mains Wastewater pumping stations All valves and appurtenances Stormwater Management Stormwater pipes and catchbasins Stormwater outlets Stormponds Oil/grit separators Roads Municipal Roads and curbs Sidewalks Street lights Solid Waste Management No physical assets Facilities Administration building Recreation facilities Library Fire Halls Misc properties Fleet Facilities Operations Parks Operations By-Law Operations Roads Operations Water/Wastewater Operations Solid Waste Operations Land, Parkland, & Land Parks Improvements Park shade structures Parking lots Sports fields and courts Trails, Paths and walkways Playgrounds Street Trees and Wood Lots Line Fences The management of these assets is governed by polices, principles and strategies outlined in this document and are based on internationally accepted asset management practices. 6 P age Town of Aurora

12 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 ASSET MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK This asset management plan is based on a three level framework focused on establishing clear linkages between asset management activities and the organizations strategic objectives. The goal of this plan is to achieve the following objectives: Link organizational strategic objectives with the asset management policies and objectives needed to deliver them Link organizational strategic objectives with the levels of service that assets should deliver Guide the asset management priorities and work required on the assets to achieve the objectives and ensure that there is adequate financial resources available to support that work The asset management framework adopted by IES provides for the key elements necessary to maintain a sustainable and affordable asset management plan. This framework is outlined in the following graphic. This plan is presented under these five headings and from the overarching strategy for asset management. There are many other studies, reports, databases, programs, and procedures that are referenced in this plan and that form the bulk of the content and process for the day to day acquisition, maintenance, monitoring, testing and operation of the various assets the department oversees. 7 P age Town of Aurora

13 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 SETTING DIRECTION FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT KEY LINKAGES TO THE CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN The Town of Aurora Strategic Plan was updated in 2011 and provides direction to the 2013 horizon. This is a Council endorsed plan that we created through multiple stakeholder and community group efforts and represents the current vision for the Town which is stated as follows. An innovative and sustainable community where neighbours care and businesses thrive The plan is based on the three pillars of sustainability being Community, Economy, and Natural Environment. And identified a number of guiding principles from which the goals and objectives developed. As a first level linkage to the Strategic Plan, this asset management plan has adopted some of the key principles that created the 2013 vision as they have direct relationship to the assets that support the community. The principles carried through this plan include: Adopting a long term perspective Leadership in corporate management Leverage partnerships Corporate excellence and continuous improvement This plan directly supports the following Goals and Objectives both identified in the strategic plan and as identified through departmental priorities: Goal Objective Supporting an exceptional quality of life for all Improve transportation, mobility and connectivity Invest in sustainable infrastructure Strengthen the fabric of our community Supporting environmental stewardship and sustainability Encouraging the stewardship of Aurora s natural resources Promoting and advancing green initiatives Fiscal Management Plan for long term funding reserves Balance service needs and growth with asset condition and investment needs 8 P age Town of Aurora

14 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 TOWN OF AURORA S ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY Taking leadership from the organizations Strategic Plan, the town has developed the following asset management policy statement: The assets of the Town of Aurora are critical to contributing to an exceptional quality of life for the community. The town views sustainability and environmental stewardship as leading goals in preserving our assets for present and future generations. In achieving these goals, the principles of having a long term perspective, leadership in corporate management, leveraging partnerships, and continuous improvement will form the basis in developing asset management plans that balance short term costs and needs with long term sustainability and financial viability for present and future generations. 9 P age Town of Aurora

15 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 EXPECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE UNDERSTANDING THE USER GROUPS Service levels are often directed by a combination of the needs of the user community, the affordability level of the services, and capacity of existing infrastructure. As a first step in this process, the users of the various asset classes are defined to assist in guiding service level definitions and performance targets. Functional Area Associated Service Providers Community Users Water and Wastewater Contractors Households, businesses, industry Regional Government Fire Department Parks Department Stormwater Contractors Parks Department Conservation Authority Community environmental stewards Province of Ontario Conservation Authority Roads Contractors Households, businesses, industry Regional Government Tourists Pedestrians/cyclists Transit Emergency services Solid Waste Management Contractors Households, businesses, industry Facilities Contractors Program users Residents Regional scale programs Arts and culture Administration staff Community groups Fleet Contractors Internal staff Parks Contractors Program users Residents Community Groups Forestry Municipal Government Contractors Residents Businesses The service levels have been defined based on the expected needs of the various community users and form a high level set of objectives that either directly support user needs or indirectly support those needs through other requirements such as legislative compliance, sustainability or economic efficiency which eventually lead to improved customer experience. The following tables identify specific services levels for each asset class, as well as the drivers that shaped the service level. From this information, performance metrics and related targets are defined which form the basis of the asset requirements for the existing community. 10 P age Town of Aurora

16 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 WATER SERVICES The Town is responsible for water distribution to the end users, consumer metering, and billing. York Region is responsible for water production and bulk distribution. Water in Aurora is 25 percent ground water source and 75 percent lake based source. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Maintain system pressures in target range Reported low pressure events <10/year Provide safe potable water Maximize water conservation Industry practices, protection of system due to reverse pressure, user experience Legislation, public health, system security Sustainability, environmental protection, economic efficiency Water main breaks Fire hydrant flow testing Incidence of averse water quality Water chemistry Watermain flushing Water loss tracking to measure revenue, nonrevenue, and lost water Full system cost recovery Annual consumption per household <5/year Each main tested at least once every 5 years <0.01% of total sample count Within provincial standards 20% of watermains to be swabbed /year Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI)<1 Annual operating and long term capital fully funded through rate revenues <200m3/year /household WASTEWATER SERVICES The Town is responsible for wastewater collection and delivery to Regional trunk infrastructure. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Availability of sewer system to transmit flows Legislation, user expectation Private side backups reported per year <10/year Mainline backups reported per year <10/year Minimize risk of discharge of untreated sewage to the environment Maximize sewer transmission capacity and system efficiency Legislation, public health, environmental protection Sustainability, environmental protection, economic efficiency sewer main breaks/spill to environment Pumping station sewage by-pass/spill to environment CCTV Inspections Infrastructure integrity Zero/year Zero inspect min once/7yrs zero structural failures /yr Under review Under review 11 P age Town of Aurora

17 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 STORMWATER SYSTEM The Town is responsible of all stormwater manager from water collected from Town owned roads. This includes pipes, ponds and oil/grit separators. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Provide flood free roadways Meet storm discharge water quality and quantity objectives Public safety, user expectation Number of road closures due to flooding Catch basin cleaning Legislation, public health, environmental protection Maintain storm pond design capacity <10/year 100% per year Min 90% of design capacity ROADS SERVICES The Town is responsible for all local roads. Regional road maintenance is Regional responsibility. However, the Town is responsible for all streetlights except for those specifically positioned to illuminate Regional intersections. All sidewalks and multiuse trails within the road allowance are Town owned. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Traffic congestion and network usability Public safety, user expectation, economic impacts Number of traffic related complaints <10/year Intersection signal optimization Average traffic volume compared to road capacity 100% annually reviewed Average volume>80% of lane capacity Road condition and driver experience Legislation, user expectations, safety, asset reliability Update Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Average PCI Updated max 5 yr cycle Network avg 60 SOLID WASTE SERVICES The Town is responsible for waste collection and delivery to Regional facilities for further processing and disposal. This service is fully contracted and the Town owned no assets related to the delivery of this service. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Waste is collected prior to end of set out day Maximize recycle material recovery rate Moving to zero waste Public safety, user expectation Number of late/missed pickup calls Sustainability, environmental benefit, economic benefit Sustainability, economics, environmental impact, Minimize over compaction of blue box material Avg annual collection per household <50/year 95% of loads >2:1 compaction <200kg/year 12 P age Town of Aurora

18 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 FACILITIES SERVICES The facilities portfolio includes property, buildings related to administration services, community centres, library, fire services, other misc buildings that are available for public use or leased to third party tenants. This portfolio does not include parks assets such as fields, trails, out buildings or shelters. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Facilities are available to meet community and programming needs User expectation, cultural support, health, economics Number of unplanned facility shut downs per year (all locations) <10/year Public enjoyment of pool facilities Public enjoyment of ice facilities General acceptability of facilities Legislation, public health, user expectations Meet public health reporting requirements Meet equipment maintenance schedules User expectation, cultural support, health, economics Public, users, legislation, economics, sustainability Meet equipment maintenance schedules Frequency of cleaning Cleaning effectiveness Environmental comfort 100% compliance 100% of planned maintenance completed 100% of planned maintenance completed Meet planned cleaning schedules 95% of time Minimum quarterly management inspections per facility <10 complaints/yr FLEET SERVICES All Town owned rolling stock and small equipment is included in this portfolio. Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Maximize equipment up time User expectation, sustainability, economics Number of unplanned maintenance events <4/asset/year Number of planned maintenance events <7 per asset/year Average time per service <3 hour event Maximize equipment capital and maintenance investment Sustainability, cost effectiveness, economics Asset replacement target As per planned asset life cycle or >10% value of maintenance cost per year 13 P age Town of Aurora

19 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 PARKS SERVICES Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target High quality Facilities are available to meet community needs, public enjoyment, and general acceptability of facilities User expectation, cultural support, health& safety, economics, legislation, sustainability Number of unplanned maintenance events Number of planned maintenance events Frequency of maintenance and repair Facility inspections / effectiveness Adherence to maintenance /repair standards 10/year overall parks system As per parks service level standards Meet planned maintenance and repairs 95% of the time Minimum 12 per asset /year 20 complaints/yr URBAN FORESTRY SERVICES Service Level Driver Performance Metric Target Street Trees and woodlots remain in safe condition Limiting public risk Respond to emergency forestry issues Routine maintenance of street tree inventory User expectation, cultural support, health, economics, legislation, sustainability Managed forest Plan Number of unplanned maintenance events Number of planned maintenance events Frequency of maintenance and repair Effectiveness process work orders and customer communication in a timely fashion 30/year/variable due to environmental conditions As per urban forestry policy Meet planned maintenance functions 95% of the time Limit &mitigate public liability issues 24 hours after detection 3 days <10 complaints/yr EXTERNAL TRENDS OR ISSUES External trends that may affect the Expected Levels of Service or the Township s ability to meet them include: Climate change Changing accessibility standards Taxpayer concerns on service levels Federal and Provincial Government funding Growth and requirement for additional/new services 14 P age Town of Aurora

20 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 CURRENT PERFORMANCE RELATIVE TO TARGET PERFORMANCE Service Service Level Performance Metric Target Performance Current Performance Watermain Wastewater Stormwater Roads Maintain system pressures in target range Provide safe potable water Maximize water conservation Availability of Sewer System to transmit flows Minimize risk of discharge of untreated sewage to the environment Maximize sewer transmission capacity and system efficiency Provide flood free roadways Traffic congestion and network usability Road condition and driver experience Reported low pressure events <10 /year average 50 calls per year Water main breaks <5 /year average 10 per year Fire hydrant flow testing Incidence of averse water quality Each main tested at least once every 5 years To start Flowing testing in 2017/2018 <0.01% of total sample count Average 3 adverse samples out of 900 samples per year Water chemistry Within provincial standards Target met Watermain flushing Water loss tracking to measure revenue, nonrevenue, and lost water Full system cost recovery Annual consumption per household Private side backups reported per year Mainline backups reported per year Sewer main breaks/spill to environment Pumping station sewage by-pass/spill to environment 20% /5 years of watermains to be swabbed /year Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI)<1 Annual operating and long term capital fully funded through rate revenues Target met ILI = 1.42 Town started water meter replacement program in 2014, 1000 meters a year <200 m3/year/household m3/year/household <10 /year Average 60 sewer back up a year <10 /year Average 1 per year or less Zero /year Zero Average 1 per year or less Target met CCTV inspections Inspect at least once /7years The Town spends $150, a year on CCTV Inspections Infrastructure integrity Zero structural failures /year Based on CCTV Inspections Under review Under review N/A Number of road <10 /year 0 /year closures due to flooding Catch basin cleaning 100% per year 30% a year -- $50,000 a year for Catch Basin Cleaning Number of traffic related complaints Intersection signal optimization Update Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Update Pavement Condition Index (PCI) <10 complaints/year <5 complaints/year 100% annually reviewed Signal optimization is done only when there is a need. This can be changed to be done annually Updated max 5 year cycle Updated max 5 year cycle Updated every 3 to 5 years Updated every 3 to 5 years Average PCI Network average 60 Network average 72 over the last 9 years 15 P age Town of Aurora

21 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Service Service Level Performance Metric Target Performance Current Performance Solid Waste Waste is collected prior to end of set out day Maximize recycle material recovery rate Moving to zero waste Number of late/missed pickup calls Minimize over compaction of blue box material Average annual collection per household <50 calls/year 68 calls/year late calls, 41 missed calls >95% of loads have less than 2:1 compaction < 200 kg/year 373 kg/year 93.6% of loads have less than 2.5:1 compaction Facilities Facilities are available to meet community and programming needs Public enjoyment of pool facilities Public enjoyment of ice facilities General acceptability of facilities Number of unplanned facility shut downs per year (all locations) Meet public health reporting requirements Meet equipment maintenance schedules Meet equipment maintenance schedules Frequency of cleaning Cleaning effectiveness < 10 /year 0 /year 100% compliance 100% compliance 100% of planned maintenance completed 100% of planned maintenance completed Meet planned cleaning schedules 95% of time Minimum quarterly management inspections per facility 100% of planned maintenance completed 100% of planned maintenance completed Target met Target met Environmental comfort <10 complaints/year Target met Fleet Maximize equipment up time Maximize equipment capital and maintenance investment Number of unplanned maintenance events Number of planned maintenance events Average time per service event Asset replacement target <4 /asset/year 8/asset/year (for fleet 3 years or older) <7 /asset/year 7/asset/year <3 hours 4 hours As per planned asset life cycle or >10% value of maintenance cost per year N/A Parks Services High quality facilities are available to meet community needs, public employment and general acceptability of facilities Number of unplanned maintenance events Number of planned maintenance events Frequency of maintenance and repair Facility inspections / effectiveness Adherence to maintenance /repair standards 10/year overall parks system As per parks service level standards Meet planned maintenance and repairs 95% of the time Minimum 12 per asset /year 20 complaints/year Target met Target met Target met Target met Target met 16 P age Town of Aurora

22 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Service Service Level Performance Metric Target Performance Current Performance Street trees and woodlots remain in safe condition limiting public risk Number of unplanned maintenance events Number of planned maintenance events 30 /year/variable due to environmental conditions As per urban forestry policy Target met Target met Urban Forestry Services Respond to emergency forestry issues Routine maintenance of street tree inventory Frequency of maintenance and repair Effectiveness Process work orders and customer communication in a timely fashion Meet planned maintenance functions 95% of the time Limit &mitigate public liability issues 24 hours after detection 3 days Target met Target met Target met 17 P age Town of Aurora

23 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 STATE OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE Annually, as part of their operations, Departments conduct a general assessment of the condition of their assets. This general assessment is used in development of priorities for the current year budget. More detailed and broad condition assessments are completed on a cyclical basis based on industry standards for the asset class. For the purpose of Asset Management planning, the asset condition information will be updated when the broad assessments are completed on an asset class. An overall condition assessment is provided. Asset Class Asset Type Inventory / Quantity / Extent Financial Accounting Valuation Replacement Cost Valuation Average Asset Age (Years) Estimated Average Useful Life (Years) Overall Asset Condition Watermain Wastewater Stormwater Water Mains kilometers $50,047, $721,005, Good Water Valves 2152 valves $2,490, $7,102, Poor Underground Enclosures 590 enclosures $1,642, $11,182, Good Fire Hydrants 1378 hydrants $3,421, $9,776, Poor Service Connections services $4,792, $28,245, Fair Booster Stations 1 station $350, $1,687, Fair Sewers kilometers $38,835, $584,375, Good Maintenance Chambers 2601 chambers $7,831, $54,816, Fair Laterals laterals $5,546, $87,343, Good Equalization Tanks 1 tank $222, $1,416, Good Pumping Stations 4 stations $1,179, $7,077, Fair Sewers kilometers $51,061, $430,976, Good Maintenance Chambers 2549 chambers $8,263, $56,613, Good Catchbasins 4610 catchbasins $7,002, $47,817, Good Laterals laterals $4,749, $52,508, Good Cleanouts 12 cleanouts $5, $87, Very Good Headwalls 188 headwalls $688, $4,737, Good SWM Ponds 45 ponds $8,341, N/A 19.4 N/A N/A Equalization Tanks 13 tanks $2,195, $15,047, Fair Bridges & Culverts 80 crossings $8,392, $35,308, Failed 18 P age Town of Aurora

24 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Asset Class Asset Type Inventory / Quantity / Extent Roads Solid Waste Pavement & Curbs centerline kilometers Financial Accounting Valuation Replacement Cost Valuation Average Asset Age (Years) Estimated Average Useful Life (Years) Overall Asset Condition $53,986, $183,803, Fair Pedestrian Paths kilometers $7,197, $20,414, Poor Road Luminaires 4409 luminaires $8,327, $23,200, Very Poor Signage 6288 signs $220, $427, Failed Traffic Signals 13 signal intersections $797, $1,785, Failed contracted service N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Facilities 22 facilities and $71,390, N/A Very buildings Poor Fleet Approximately 90 $7,993, N/A Fair vehicles and related pieces Machinery & Equipment Various pieces $6,053, N/A Poor Land, Parkland & Land Improvements 700 acres of combined open space and parkland land associated with each Municipal Facility land maintained for environmental purposes 48 kilometers of off-road trails. $20,871, N/A Good Age to Useful Life Ratio Condition 85 to 100 Excellent 70 to 85 Very Good 55 to 70 Good 40 to 55 Fair 25 to 40 Poor 10 to 25 Very Poor 0 to 10 Failed 19 P age Town of Aurora

25 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 ASSET INVENTORY AND VALUATION Assets have been inventoried in compliance with PSAB 3150 asset which provides for a statement of assets owned, a simple life cycle assessment, historic costs, and an annual depreciation value that complies with regulatory reporting requirements and provides a basic forecast for asset replacement. However, PSAB 3150 is not an asset management plan and has a number of shortfalls that hinder its usefulness for sustainable asset management. These include historic cost valuation which does not account for inflated replacement costs, asset condition factors, or changes in materials and technology which influences asset life and performance. The asset list developed for PSAB 3150 does however provide an accurate foundation of what is owned and is the base information for development and support of the overlaying asset management strategies. The following is a summary of the asset inventory. ASSET CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Specific condition and performance techniques are applied to each asset class based on the nature of the asset, and the criticality and risk associated with the asset. The following table outlines the assessments applied to each asset class based on three categories of condition assessment, performance assessment, and risk assessment. Asset Class Condition Assessment Approach Performance Assessment Approach Risk Management Approach Water Visual inspection through CCTV System Wastewater system Stormwater System Roads System Visual inspection through CCTV Visual inspection of pipes through CCTV Visual inspection of ponds and separators Routine road patrols for emerging and acute condition deficiencies. Pavement Condition Index rating system to priorities replacements. Water quality and chlorine residual monitoring. Pressure monitoring. Water loss monitoring. Inflow/infiltration studies, smoke and dye testing Leak tracking through CCTV Discharge water quality assessments Design capacity assessments Traffic capacity studies Proactive maintenance and replacement to manage risk of failure and maintain performance Routine testing to ensure water quality Material and age based evaluation Proactive maintenance and replacement to manage risk of failure and maintain performance Material and age based evaluation Proactive maintenance Technical studies to assess overall system priorities Traffic capacity studies Solid Waste No assets in this class Compliance with contract terms Compliance with contract terms Public education and promotion programs Facilities Visual inspections Testing and monitoring programs Energy usage tracking Reliability centred maintenance practices Equipment age and obsolescence Fleet Scheduled maintenance program with condition assessment Benchmark to expected service level from equipment Age, repair history, type of use, public and employee safety Parks Planned monthly visual inspections expected service life cycling of individual asset Proactive maintenance and repair to maintain users safety and manage risks and maintain performance over asset life span 20 P age Town of Aurora

26 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 The following summarizes the overall asset score based on a letter grading scheme. As this rating applies to differing asset classes, consideration may be given to all or some of the rating targets bases on the evaluation team s familiarity and knowledge of the assets being rated. This approach is applied to each class as a general rating, however, there will be assets within each sub-class that will rate higher or lower than the reported score. Detailed asset replacement plans are maintained as supporting documentation to these summaries and are updated on regular frequencies. Description Score A B C D E Asset has at least 80 percent of useful life remaining. Performance maintained to 90 percent or greater of design level. Energy efficiency within 90 percent of current market availability for similar equipment. Maintenance costs less than 5 percent of asset book value per year Asset in overall excellent condition Asset has at least 75 percent of useful life remaining. Performance maintained to 80 percent or less of design level. Energy efficiency within 75 percent of current market availability for similar equipment. Maintenance costs 5-10 percent of asset book value per year Asset in overall good condition Asset has at least 50 percent of useful life remaining. Performance maintained to 70 percent or less of design level. Energy efficiency within 50 percent of current market availability for similar equipment. Maintenance costs 5-10 percent of asset book value per year Asset in overall moderate condition Asset has at least 25 percent of useful life remaining. Performance maintained to 50 percent or less of design level. Energy efficiency within 40 percent of current market availability for similar equipment. Maintenance costs10-20 percent of asset book value per year Asset in overall poor condition Asset has exceeded expected useful life. Performance does not meet intended design level. Energy efficiency less than 40 percent of current market availability for similar equipment. Maintenance costs exceed 20 percent of asset book value per year Asset in overall poor to unserviceable condition 21 P age Town of Aurora

27 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 ASSET RATING SUMMARY The following table summarizes the asset rating for each asset sub-class. Asset Class/Sub-Class Score Future Considerations Water Water Mains B Continue with CCTV and relining program Pumping Stations C Consider bringing maintenance in-house Valves/chambers/PRV C Perform detailed valve performance assessment and prioritize replacements Fire Hydrants B Commercial Meters C Residential Meters E Majority exceeding design life and vulnerable to failure Wastewater Mains B Continue with relining and CCTV program Manholes C Continue with inspections and relining as warranted Laterals D Consider assumption of private side and initiate full relining program Pumping Stations C Consider bringing maintenance in-house Forcemains C Confirm inspection schedule for forcemains and siphons Stormwater pipes B Review inspection program and update condition assessments catchbasins B Review cleaning program and update condition assessments manholes C Review inspection program and update condition assessments Outfalls/headwalls D Review inspection program and update condition assessments Ditches/culverts C Review inspection program and update condition assessments Oil/grit separators C Review inspection program and update condition assessments Storm ponds C Initiate recommendations from updated masterplan Roads Pavement/curbs B Consider alternative condition assessment approaches to augment PCI program and potentially reduce life cycle costs Sidewalks B Bridges B Maintain compliance with inspection requirements Multiuse paths B Review service levels and community needs Street lights D Update asset condition assessment Retrofit to LED to energy savings Solid Waste Fleet D In year 7 of 10 year contract. Initiate scope for retender. Facilities General Site B Parking pavement D Most at end of useful life with replacements scheduled Building envelope C Consider third party assessment for buildings exceeding 25 yrs Ice plant B Recent energy/equipment retrofits completed Pool systems B Review program maintenance and upgrade schedules HVAC C Review replacement philosophy Mechanical C Phase 1 energy retrofit program nearing completion Electrical B Phase 1 energy retrofit program nearing completion Equipment C Phase 1 energy retrofit program nearing completion Fire Protection C Review status relative to industry advancements Security B Review status relative to industry advancements Fleet Light duty vehicles B Heavy duty vehicles C Tractors/loaders C Small equipment B Parks 22 P age Town of Aurora

28 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Playground equipment C Majority within useful life of at least 50% remaining,major review of asset on an annual basis Trails/Bridges B Maintain compliance with inspection requirements and annual maintenance program Sports fields/pathway lighting C Maintain industry standards for lighting levels,review performance and assessment of latest LED sport field lighting equipment for potential future retrofit Outdoor sports facilities and courts C Sports facilities generally compliant with industry standards, continue to monitor and maintain and retrofit facilities in accordance with life cycling schedule Park pavilions / shelters / washroom facilities / out buildings C Majority within useful life of at least 50% remaining,major review of asset on an annual basis, continue to monitor assets falling below B rating and update replacement forecast as required Line fences D Significant deterioration in many areas and end of useful service life particularly where fence lines exceed 30 years ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY - NEEDS ANALYSIS FUTURE DEMANDS AND GAP ANALYSIS Future demands are driving by community growth pressures, obsolescence, changes to technology, and economic changes in the broader environment. These demands are typical forecast through various studies and planning exercises from which the demand for new infrastructure is identified. Studies are also completed for various assets to assess current condition and operational/maintenance needs. All this information is used to develop the various operations, maintenance and capital plans. The following table provides a summary the various documents. Report Assets Affected Comments Transportation Master Plan Road network Sidewalks/multiuse paths Intersections/traffic lights Water/wastewater hydraulic modeling Water system Wastewater system Plan is updated on a 5 year cycle and identifies capacity constraints and infrastructure gaps. Growth related needs are reported in Development Charges Background Study and 10 yr capital plan Periodic model updates identify system constrains in growth areas that are captured in DC background study and 10 yr capital plan Stormwater Master Plan Stormwater system Updated every 5 years and identified maintenance and growth related impacts to existing asset base as well as opportunities for effluent improvement based on changes to technology and regulations. Projects captured in 10 yr capital plan Pavement Condition Assessment Road network Sidewalk condition assessment Sidewalks and multiuse paths Annual inspections form basis for annual maintenance and repairs Parks and Recreation Master Plan Parks and Facilities Growth related facilities identified in plan and captured in DC background study and 10 yr capital plan, Updated on 5yr. cycle Trails Master Plan Trails Growth related facilities identified in plan and captured in DC background study and 10 yr capital plan Official Plan Roads Water/wastewater/storm Solid waste facilities Growth related facilities identified in plan and captured in DC background study and 10 yr capital plan Subdivision related development results in assumption of developer constructed assets Promenade Study Roads, sidewalks, lighting Community based plan to improve downtown character in support of economic revitalization. Projects defined in study captured in DC study and 10 yr capital plan 23 P age Town of Aurora

29 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Report Assets Affected Comments Fleet management report Fleet Updated periodically. Provides direction on life cycle targets, asset service levels and long term financial forecast including maintenance and growth. Replacement requirements captured in DC background study and 10 yr capital plan. Winter Maintenance Management Plan Roads Fleet Updated on 5 yr cycle. Provides direction of snow management, asset impacts and maintenance requirements. Capital requirements captured in 10 yr capital plan Integrated Solid Waste Master Plan Waste Collection Focus on reducing waste generation and operating/capital costs of program. Minimal asset impact due to contracted services, however drives initiatives that improve overall system performance and long term collection targets OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE STRATEGY The operations and maintenance strategy provides the guidance for these functions and results in the annual work plan and operating/maintenance budget. The strategic objectives for O&M are: Provide adequate capacity to balance user service level expectations with cost for new infrastructure Maintain public health and safety as a priority Invest based on life cycle awareness of extending the useful life at the optimal cost while meeting desired service levels Recommend asset replacement when O&M costs exceed target thresholds for sustainable operation. Consider both demand side and supply side capacity management opportunities when investing O&M dollars (i.e. fixing leaks before building more pipes) Consider sustainability and environmental opportunities in O&M decisions where appropriate Consider emergency response planning requirements and alternative operating modes in response to known emergency conditions. Ensure adequate skills are available through training and mentorship Ensure systems are in place to support data management and O&M recording and reporting to assist in long term asset decision making Periodically review asset functionality to ensure intended purpose is met Focus on proactive maintenance planning and execution through use of maintenance management software Identify appropriate mode of operation based on asset class (RCM, run to failure, risk based redundancy etc.) Define standard work flow and work procedures for improved consistency and efficiency OVERVIEW OF RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH STRATEGY The largest risk in generating expected service levels is based on financial concerns. This has been the cause of the infrastructure deficits which exist currently. Other risks are in changing engineering studies as they can change significantly on the updates provided. We are looking at the possibility of a long term agreement so that there is more consistency in the studies with the same vendor providing the updates. 24 P age Town of Aurora

30 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 OPTION ANALYSIS The options for expected level of service must be compared based on: 1. Lifecycle cost - total cost of constructing, maintaining, renewing, and operating an infrastructure asset throughout its service life; 2. Future costs - must be discounted and inflation must be incorporated; 3. All other relevant direct/indirect costs and benefits associated with each option - i.e. municipal wellbeing and health, amenity value, value of culturally or historically significant sites, municipal image. The options for expected levels of service have been captured in the Appendix section. Based on the expected levels of growth in the Town, we do not foresee significant changes in service levels and as a result, a more comprehensive option analysis was not required and the expected service levels have been incorporated in the current financial forecast. 25 P age Town of Aurora

31 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 FINANCING STRATEGY - PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS PLAN AND FINANCIAL STRATEGY The primary objective for operations is to develop an O&M program that meets the short to intermediate needs of the assets while maintaining a relatively stable annual cost profile. This objective has been established to both allow for effective maintenance while respecting the disruptive impact of introducing wide swings in the operating budget development process. Stability in the annual cost profile minimizes impact to the tax rate. The current approach to developing the operations plan is as follows: Assess the O&M needs for each of the asset classes Establish a funding target that balances level of service requirements with asset condition/serviceability Monitor annual effectiveness of O&M program to meet set criteria Forecast budget adjustments in out years as needed to maintain service level/o&m program balance Identify anomalous expenditure requirements for inclusion in the 10 year capital plan CAPITAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL STRATEGY The capital plan is forecast with a 50 year horizon with the first 10 years reported through the corporate financial planning report referred to at the 10 year capital plan. The capital planning process is as follows: Review all master plans and other studies to verify inclusion of out year projects Review forecasted construction year based on asset life, condition, growth pressures, maintenance record, coordination the related assets, risk considerations, and corporate priorities Make necessary annual priority adjustments Verify in year projects through condition and performance review and defer projects that can be extended without long term impact to asset value and the produce an economic benefit by deferral. Review forecast cost estimates Assign appropriate funding sources Review overall cash flow impact and adjust program to smooth our annual spending Review impact to various reserve funds and further adjust program to accommodate reserve restrictions or recommend increased reserve contributions to future years Recommend overall 10 year forecast and in year capital projects for Council approval and funding. RISK MANAGEMENT Risk management is currently performed informally except for water supply which has been evaluated through completion of the requirements for the Drinking Water Quality Management System. Future plans include development of a risk prioritization plan for the various asset classes and progression to risk registries for each of the asset sub-classes. Known risk are recognized and appropriate risk management techniques are employed as necessary to both protect public health and safety and mitigation of risks in accordance with corporate tolerance. 26 P age Town of Aurora

32 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS YEAR NON- INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES RENEWAL/REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES REPLACEMENT ACTIVITIES DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES EXPANSION ACTIVITIES TOTAL AMOUNT APPROVED BUDGET ,000 4,645,500 7,727, , ,779 13,205,700 26,923, ,000 4,785,400 6,014, , ,240 19,485,900 31,979, ,000 4,956,400 6,687, , ,739 4,138,600 17,659, ,000 5,229,200 8,310,310 2,735,280 1,326,810 18,895,290 36,986, ,000 5,516,000 7,198,833 3,858, ,517 18,610,560 35,940, ,000 6,625,400 8,368,761 4,884, ,355 5,599,380 26,996,806 EXPENDITURE FORECASTS ,000 6,714,900 5,118,820 3,602, ,892 7,345,440 23,641, ,000 6,806,100 2,344,202 4,752, ,150 8,455,000 22,953, ,000 6,899,100 7,092,132 1,862, ,016 4,765,630 21,661, ,000 6,993,900 2,489,763 2,325,320 64,215 1,075,000 13,248, ,000 7,090,400 7,188,993 1,400, , ,000 17,219, ,000 7,188,800 9,540,754 1,969, ,083 3,300,000 23,739, ,000 7,289,000 4,698,175 77, ,296 5,868,110 18,510, P age Town of Aurora

33 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 REVENUE ANALYSIS YEAR LINE OF CREDIT SPECIAL PURPOSE RESERVES REPAIR & REPLACEMENT RESERVE GROWTH & NEW RESERVES WATER / SEWER / STORM RESERVES DEVELOPME NT CHARGES GRANTS EXTERNAL FUNDING OTHER REVENUE OPERATING RESERVE TOTAL AMOUNT ,315,000 1,959, ,000 2,651,000 3,028,000 3,854, , ,847,000 ACTUAL ,000 4,182,500 1,052,500 3,148,400 5,689,200 1,196,800 15,000 6,000,000-21,941, ,116,900 3,237, ,200 2,798,300 8,953,600 2,006, ,100 8,030,900-27,171, ,500 4,754, , , ,100 2,134,600 3,245,000-4,957,388 17,224, ,164, ,200 1,050,629 3,657,300 16,296,100 1,540, , ,000 5,230,126 51,750, ,048, ,500 3,998,159 1,376,126 2,888,200 16,416,334 1,617,541-2,800,000 5,516,000 35,436, ,644,500 3,942, ,438 4,007,700 4,475,042 1,617, ,000 6,625,400 22,833,006 REVENUE FORECASTS , , ,944 1,724,332 6,425,696 1,694,566-2,000,000 6,714,900 20,531, ,000 2,343, ,000 1,500,000 7,452,000 1,694, ,806,100 20,940, ,500 2,386, , ,000 3,387,875 1,694, ,899,100 16,271, ,032-2,926, ,000 1,694, ,993,900 12,948, ,000 3,501,143 15,000 4,097, ,000 1,694, ,091,400 17,169, ,000 7,962,789 15,000 2,641,092 2,970,000 1,694, ,189,870 23,188, ,000 2,380, ,811 1,147,091 5,180,299 1,694, ,290,000 18,279, P age Town of Aurora

34 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 KEY ASSUMPTIONS The Asset Management Plan forecasts are based on most expected growth and levels of service. Key assumptions made included the following: Assumed that Municipality will continue to receive Gas Tax Grant Indefinitely; Assumed that Municipality will fully collect Planned Developer Charge Revenue; Assumed that the Municipality will be able to increase its Tax Levy allocation towards its Reserves by one percent per annum; and Where inflation was deemed appropriate, an inflation rate of 2.5% was utilized 29 P age Town of Aurora

35 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 PROGRAM DELIVERY PROJECT PROCUREMENT Both operating and capital funded programs follow the same project procurement process that complies with purchasing and financial reporting requirements. Project procurement is managed through a Project Management Office where standards, procedures and templates are employed to ensure consistent and effective delivery of all asset related projects. The processes are well documented and reviewed on a regular basis and involve the cooperation of various support departments for execution. Project procurement follows these steps: Timing Previous year Current year Q1 Budget approvals - Q2 Review & Update of 10 year capital plan Project start Q2 Budget preparation Project execution Q2 Budget presentation & approval - Q3 Q4 Tender preparation and issuance Project closeout or carry forward as required EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW Asset management is delivered with the support from all areas of the organization. The Corporation s linear assets are overseen by an Asset Management Steering Group which was established an asset management core in This group s capacity has been slowly developing over time. The current asset management structure is as follows: The support functions have not all been formalized at this point but are performed to varying degrees based on risk and priority. These functions are performed by the various designated staff with reporting occurring on an as required basis. The asset management project team consists of three staff that work closely together to support 30 P age Town of Aurora

36 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 asset related functions. The central application is currently Maximo with plans to expand into other asset areas both through further development of this tool and augmentation with additional practices based on continuous improvement opportunities. The Asset Management Steering Team provides overall guidance and direction for the asset management plan. Asset related discussions occur twice a month and needs and priorities are reviewed at least twice a year. Specific discussions also occur throughout the year as required. Topics include budget reviews, reserve fund reviews, annual capital project prioritization and scheduling reviews, risk management reviews, environmental scan and industry opportunity reviews. 31 P age Town of Aurora

37 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY The continuous improvement plan for asset management is measured against twenty four criteria that touch on the various aspects of the plan. The purpose of this self-assessment is to identify areas where there is relative opportunity for improvement and plan projects focused on improving the maturity level and application of the various criteria. The following table outlines the definitions for the relative scores. Score Description 0 not performed 1 aware of need and risk 2 informal application and undocumented processes 3 partial documented processes partial use 4 application of documented processes 5 Best practice The following spider graph is a summary of scores for the various criteria across all asset classes. In recent years, significant effort has been made to advancing asset management at the Town including development of capital delivery process, quality management systems for water supply, development of salt management plan for environmental sustainability, completion of asset registry, implementation of asset and work management system, development of first level key performance indicators, digitization and categorization of all record drawings. New initiatives have not been planned for 2014 but will be identified for 2015 to 2020 during the 2015 Asset Plan update. Continuous Improvement Rating Quality Management Information Systems capital delivery 5 AM policy AM Strategy Asset handover plan sustainabilty Improvement Financial Financial Reporting AM Plans Strategic Long Data Management AM roles/practices KPI's Demand Forecasting Levels of Service Capital Plan Asset Register Data Maintenance Plan Asset Condition Operational Plan Risk Management Decision Making 32 P age Town of Aurora

38 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 APPENDIX 1 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ROADS INVENTORY: AS OF OCTOBER 2010 There are approximately centerline kilometers of roads within the Town of Aurora. ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: The useful life of transportation infrastructure ranges from 15 to 50 years. The useful life of road infrastructure is dependent on the type of surface, climate conditions, and level of service. Arterial 33 years Collector 34 years Local 36 years INTEGRATED: REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Roads are integrated with other buried assets located in the utility corridor such as: water, sewer, storm sewers, hydro, telephone, natural gas and cable. They have an impact on street lighting, traffic signals and sidewalks. The Town of Aurora uses AECOM s pavement management software system licensed for Town use. The last pavement management system study has been completed by AECOM in October 2010 and represents a network-level analysis intended to serve as a tool for long-term pavement improving planning. Aurora began formal pavement management with AECOM in 2002 using AECOM s INFRA/PAVE software system that is based on the non-proprietary pavement evaluation system, PCI, which is supported by the Canadian Public Works Association (CPWA). Aurora s street system is comprised of flexible (asphalt) pavements that are about two thirds Local and one third Collector or Arterial functional classification. This breakdown is common among municipal street systems. The vast majority of local roads have an urban cross section (curb/gutter). Local roads with rural cross section are anticipated to be upgraded to urban cross section with their next capital improvement. Regional roads and Private roads are included in the INFRA/PAVE inventory but are not evaluated for condition and are excluded from the analysis and planning modules. The average pavement age is approaching the expected design life for asphalt pavement. The average pavement condition has remained relatively constant over the last nine years at about PCI 72. A PCI value of is common among municipalities. 33 P age Town of Aurora

39 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 The distribution of pavement condition is encouraging very few pavements in Poor condition and a large number of pavements in Excellent to Good condition. This implies a limited need for major reconstruction projects at high unit costs for the Poor pavements. The Excellent to Good pavements can provide good performance for a long period by pursuing a low-cost maintenance plan of crack sealing and patching. Aurora-specific pavement deterioration models were developed by INFRA/PAVE based on nine years of pavement inspection data. Pavement Class Standard Engineering Usage: Arterial serves primarily mobility between point A and point B Collector collects local traffic to feed into the Arterial system partly mobility and partly land access Local serves primarily land access Pavement Type - Standard Engineering Usage Asphalt petroleum-based asphaltic concrete or flexible pavement Concrete Portland cement concrete or rigid pavement Composite Asphalt overlay or concrete pavement Brick brick pavement Paver Block concrete blocks designed for pavement application Gravel unbound aggregate material Natural unimproved right-of-way Inventory - What Pavement do we own? A breakdown by functional classification and pavement type of more than 965 pavement assets currently within the Town s capital improvement jurisdiction is presented below: Pavement classification Local 69% Collector 28% Arterial 3% Pavement Type Asphalt Collector 28% Asphalt Arterial 3% Asphalt Local, Urban 58% Asphalt Local, Rural 10% This classification does not include private roads and regional roads. 34 P age Town of Aurora

40 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Pavement Age Often, an asphalt pavement that is designed and constructed for the traffic loading it receives can be expected to last about years before major rehabilitation. Experience in Ontario has shown that higher volume roads often needs resurfacing at years of age while subdivision roads may last for years before the first major rehabilitation. The average age of the Tow s pavement system is approaching these age ranges. Pavement Inspection System The development of the pavement inspection system in Aurora was formalized in The entire Town-owned street system was included in the initial inspection. Subsequently, the entire street network was re-inspected in 2005 and the inspection schedule continued with this project in Current protocol calls for the local street system to be re-inspected on a regular cycle (every 3-5 years). Pavement inspection consists of identification, classification, and measurement of individual pavement distresses in accordance with the Canadian Public Works Association s Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating standard. The PCI system uses a 0 to 100 (Failed to Excellent) scale to describe pavement condition. Figure 4 presents the standard PCI ranges and descriptions. Note that current Aurora policy considers local street PCI rating of 25 and collector/arterial/highway streets with a rating of 40 to be the minimum acceptable service level. PCI Range Descriptions PCI Range Description 85 to 100 Excellent 70 to 85 Very Good 55 to 70 Good 40 to 55 Fair 25 to 40 Poor 10 to 25 Very Poor 0 to 10 Failed PCI Average Trend The average PCI rating for the entire pavement network is currently about 72, which falls at the low end of the "Very Good" range. This is no change from the average condition in The capital and maintenance activities in the last 9 years have been sufficient to maintain the average pavement condition. 35 P age Town of Aurora

41 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 An average PCI value of 65 to 70 is common among municipal agencies with a mix of one-third arterial streets and two-thirds local streets like Aurora. A lower average PCI might indicate an unreasonable number of poor pavements in the system. A higher average PCI can mean that the agency is not using up all the performance of a pavement and is initiating rehabilitation too early an economic inefficiency. PCI Distribution Trend PCI Distribution for Local Streets In reviewing these pavement condition distributions over time, the combined percentage of pavements in the Excellent and Very Good and Good categories has remained relatively constant for the Local streets. This is a nearly perfect distribution of pavement condition where a majority of pavements are in good condition and are candidates for low-cost maintenance actions that will provide high levels of pavement performance. There are a limited and manageable number of Local class pavement sections in Fair to Poor condition which are candidates for higher-cost major rehabilitation actions. (Note: The 2002 ranges included Under 40 which has been divided into two ranges in the 2010 data). 36 P age Town of Aurora

42 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 PCI Distribution for Collector/Arterial Streets The condition rating distribution for the Collector/Arterial system is similar to the Local system except that in 2010, the distribution in the top three ranges is more even than in The end result is still that the vast majority of pavement polygons will have a low-cost maintenance need rather than a higher-cost major rehabilitation requirement. And no bubble of major investment requirement is approaching. This current distribution trend follows one of the basic premises of pavement management - that it is more cost-effective to maintain pavements at a high service level for a low unit cost than it is to wait until pavements degrade significantly requiring high unit cost repairs. So, investments made in pavement replacement and overlays combined with an effective maintenance program pay off. The result is higher performing pavements for longer periods of time - good service for the public. The overall story told by these PCI distribution figures includes: Stable numbers of high-performing pavements Addressing the backlog of low-performing pavements Preservation of high and mid-performing pavements This result is consistent with good asset management practices. And based on actual condition data instead of pavement age as a surrogate for condition, a much clearer picture of pavement needs is defined. Also, in the future, the Town will also consider alternative condition assessment approaches to augment PCI program and potentially reduce life cycle costs. At present, different options and software programs are under consideration. 37 P age Town of Aurora

43 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Using the planning parameters described above, the 10-year capital road reconstruction plan is being developed. The most effective engineering solutions for the existing pavement network may not be achievable under budget limits, operational considerations, capacity requirements, etc. These constraints to planning can include funding source mix, funding limitations, public approval of projects, coordination with other infrastructure work, construction closure limits, traffic capacity needs as well as other considerations unique to Aurora. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: A final recommended 10-yr capital road reconstruction plan is a living document, the result of integrated planning and iterative processes. INFRA/PAVE provides candidate project lists and multi-year plans with performance (PCI) and budget impacts. Town of Aurora professional engineering staff determines the final plan then that advances selected projects to design construction. The 10-yr Capital Road Reconstruction Plan is part of the Town s 10-yr Capital Investment Plan. If road conditions and maintenance is not adequate, level of service is affected and risks and liabilities are increased. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: ESTIMATED COST: A road rehabilitation project drives the replacement of underground water and sewer infrastructure if the infrastructure is near the end of its life cycle. Town of Aurora PSAB 3150 Town of Aurora Pavement Management System, Oct yr Capital Investment Plan Audited Financial Statements (payment certificates) Total Estimated 10-yr Capital Cost for repair and replacement projects for roads and related (2014 to 2023) is $33,145,200 (as per the Aurora s Ten Year Capital Investment Plan from 2014 to 2023 ) 38 P age Town of Aurora

44 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 WATERMAIN SYSTEMS INVENTORY: The Town of Aurora has kilometers of watermain ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: INTEGRATED: The anticipated asset lifecycle ranges between 20 and 100 years. Examples: Watermain o PVC 80 years o Ductile Iron 67 years o Cast Iron 50 years o Concrete Pressure 100 years Valves 30 years Valve Chamber Structures 55 years Hydrants 30 years Water Meters 20 years May be integrated with road reconstruction projects REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Condition Assessment Approach Condition assessments are completed on an annual basis through visual inspection through CCTV which will help identify optimal rehabilitation or replacement year. Performance Assessment Approach This is accomplish through: Water quality and chlorine residual monitoring Pressure monitoring Water loss monitoring Risk Assessment Approach Proactive maintenance and replacement to manage risk of failure and maintain performance Routine testing to ensure water quality Material and age based evaluation 39 P age Town of Aurora

45 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Rehabilitation/renewal and expansion activities are scheduled as per the Ten Year Capital Investment Plan, 2014 to 2023 LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: If the life cycle of the water system were reduced, the level of service is lowered and safety may be compromised. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: A road rehabilitation project drives the replacement of underground water system infrastructure if the said infrastructure is near the end of its life cycle. Town of Aurora PSAB yr Capital Investment Plan Audited Financial Statements (payment certificates) ESTIMATED COST: Total estimated capital cost for 10 years: $43,182,360 Replacement integrated with road reconstruction projects: $38,316,089 Water Projects: $4,866, P age Town of Aurora

46 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 WASTEWATER SYSTEMS INVENTORY: The Town of Aurora has kilometers of sanitary sewers ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: The anticipated asset lifecycle ranges between 50 and 100 years. Sewers o PVC 80 years o Ductile Iron 67 years o Cast Iron 50 years o Concrete 55 years o Asbestos Cement 67 years o High Density Poly Ethylene 100 years o Vitrified Clay 55 years Maintenance Chambers o Concrete 55 years o Brick 100 years INTEGRATED: May be integrated with road reconstruction projects REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Condition Assessment Approach Condition assessments are completed on an annual basis through visual inspection through CCTV which will help identify optimal rehabilitation or replacement year. Performance Assessment Approach This is accomplish through: Inflow/infiltration studies Dye testing Leak tracking through CCTV Risk Assessment Approach Proactive maintenance and replacement to manage risk of failure and maintain performance Material and age based evaluation REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Rehabilitation/renewal and expansion activities are scheduled as per the Ten Year Capital Investment Plan, 2014 to P age Town of Aurora

47 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: If the life cycle of the water system were reduced, the level of service is lowered and safety may be compromised. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: A road rehabilitation project drives the replacement of underground water system infrastructure if the said infrastructure is near the end of its life cycle. Town of Aurora PSAB yr Capital Investment Plan Audited Financial Statements (payment certificates) ESTIMATED COST: Total estimated capital cost for 10 years: $42,703,574 Replacement with Road Reconstruction Projects: $40,617,989 Wastewater Projects: $2,085, P age Town of Aurora

48 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 STORMWATER SYSTEMS & CULVERTS INVENTORY: The Town of Aurora has kilometers of storm sewers, 44 stormwater management facilities and 26 oil/grit separators ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: The anticipated asset lifecycle ranges between 20 and 80 years Examples include: Sewers o PVC 80 years o Ribbed PVC 80 years o Corrugated Pipe 30 years o Concrete 55 years o Asbestos Cement 67 years o Vitrified Clay 55 years Maintenance Chambers o Concrete 55 years o Brick 100 years Headwalls 55 years Catchbasins o Concrete 55 years o Brick 100 years Stormwater management facilities no defined lifecycle in PSAB INTEGRATED: May be integrated with road reconstruction projects REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Condition Assessment Approach For storm sewers is completed on an annual basis through visual inspection through CCTV which will help identify optimal rehabilitation or replacement year. for culverts is completed by visual inspection for stormwater management facilities is completed by visual inspection as well as according to the operation and maintenance manuals Performance Assessment Approach This is accomplish through: Discharge water quality assessments Design capacity assessments 43 P age Town of Aurora

49 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 Risk Assessment Approach Proactive maintenance Technical studies to assess overall system priorities REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Rehabilitation/renewal and expansion activities are scheduled as per the Ten Year Capital Investment Plan, 2014 to 2023 LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: If the life cycle of the stormwater systems were reduced, the level of service is lowered and safety and property value may be compromised due to the risk of flooding. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: A road rehabilitation project drives the replacement of underground stormwater system infrastructure if the said infrastructure is near the end of its life cycle. Town of Aurora PSAB yr Capital Investment Plan Audited Financial Statements (payment certificates) ESTIMATED COST: Total estimated capital cost for 10 years: $46,199,104 Replacement with Road Reconstruction Projects: 40,617,989 Stormwater Projects: $5,581, P age Town of Aurora

50 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 FACILITIES INVENTORY The Town has 22 facilities and buildings. (As of the end of 2013) ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: Facilities and their components (roof, HVAC, etc.) have an assessed useful life ranging from 15 to 50 years. Some examples include: Boilers- 25 years Building Automation System - 20 years Concrete Foundation 50 years Generators 30 years HVAC - 15 to 25 years Lighting 15 years Parking Lot 30 years Roof 30 years INTEGRATED: Individual asset components are reviewed; projects are lumped together per asset to take advantage of the economies of scale principle. Consideration is given to minimize the disruption of operations to a given asset over time. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Each facility is assessed based on its physical condition and its capacity condition. Physical condition is ranked on a scale from very poor to very good. Capacity condition is dependent on the percentage of demand the facility, in its current condition, can support. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: The physical condition ranking helps identify the action that must be taken (renewal/rehabilitation, maintenance, replacement, etc.). The capacity condition ranking helps identify whether the asset is achieving its Expected Level of Service. Assets with a low condition ranking should be replaced or upgraded to meet life cycle, industry, technological and safety standards. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: Consequences include increased deterioration of building and properties, health and safety concerns, inefficient operation, higher operating costs, accelerated depreciation of Town assets. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: Replacement is based on actual condition, the point in time within its life cycle and the availability of resources to complete the replacement with minimal disruption to the program/service delivery within the asset. 45 P age Town of Aurora

51 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: Town of Aurora PSAB 3150 Compliance Report. ESTIMATED COST: Total Estimated Capital Cost for Ten Years: $14,276, P age Town of Aurora

52 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 VEHICLES INVENTORY: The Town has approximately 90 vehicles and related pieces. ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: The useful life of a vehicle varies depending on the service area and vehicle type, size and cost. The assessed range is between 10 and 15 years. Examples include: Gator and Trailer- 15 years Pick-up trucks- 10 years Heavy Trucks(Dump, Plow, Tandem)- 15 years Vans- 10 years Loaders-/backhoes- 12 years Tractors- 15 years INTEGRATED: Integrated with technical advances and financial plans, environmental regulations, operational changes, and service increases or decreases. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Lifecycle cost analysis considering depreciation, fuel, repairs, insurance, downtime costs, etc. will identify optimal replacement year for vehicle classes. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Review usage to warrant replacement, repair costs should not exceed normal levels for the type of vehicle involved. Review lease, seasonal rental opportunities, refurbishing strategies and possibility of contracting services to third party. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: As cost per kilometer increases, increased downtime requiring more spare units or work schedules to be lengthened, increasing manpower costs, resulting in a loss of production. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: Replacement is based on actual condition, the point in time within its life cycle, and the availability of resources to complete the replacement with minimal disruption to the program/service delivery within the asset. CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: Town of Aurora PSAB 3150 Town of Aurora Tangible Capital Asset Policies 18 Year Vehicle/Equipment Replacement Schedule (revised Jan 24, 2013) ESTIMATED COST: Total Estimated Capital Cost for Ten Year Plan: $1,391, P age Town of Aurora

53 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT INVENTORY: Equipment includes furniture and fixtures, generators, mowers, trimmers, saw chippers, pumps, nozzles hoses, air packs, specialty water rescue, safety clothing, ladders, communications, technology, extrication and fuel power for all departments. Equipment also includes all items necessary for transportation services, protection services and recreation and culture services. Equipment may be fixed or movable tangible capital asset used for operations. ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: The useful life of equipment ranges from 5 to 25 years. Some examples include: Playground equipment years Ice Resurfacers- 5 years Mowers - 5 years Solar Powered Signs 8 years Air Compressor 8 years INTEGRATED: Individual assets are kept on a replacement schedule roughly matching the useful life ranges. They are placed so as not to disrupt the operations. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: The only criterion above useful life is when the asset s productivity decreases. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Review usage to warrant replacement, repair costs should not exceed normal levels for the type of equipment involved. Review lease, seasonal rental opportunities, refurbishing strategies and possibility of contracting services to third party. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: Consequences include disruption of the operation and potential increased maintenance costs depending on the equipment involved. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: Replacement is based on actual condition, the point in time within its life cycle, and the availability of resources to complete the replacement with minimal disruption to the program/service delivery within the asset. CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: ESTIMATED COST: Town of Aurora PSAB Year Vehicle/Equipment Replacement Schedule (revised Jan 24, 2013) Total Estimated Capital Cost for 18 Years (as per the above) Replacement & Expansion: $4,279, P age Town of Aurora

54 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 LAND, PARKLAND & LAND REHABILITATION / IMPROVEMENTS INVENTORY: The Town of Aurora covers 49 square kilometers, located in the centre of the Regional Municipality of York. The town owns approximately 700 acres of combined open space and parkland, in addition to land associated with Municipal Facilities and land maintained for environmental purposes (storm water ponds). There are also approximately 48 kilometres of off-road trails, 32 playgrounds, 9 tennis courts, 7 basketball courts, 17 baseball diamonds, 33 soccer fields and 14 outbuildings/shelter/washrooms. ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: Land usually has an indefinite useful life that exceeds the useful lives of the buildings, roads or structures situated on the land. The cost of the acquired land is not amortized as land normally maintains its value over time. Land improvements (such as landscaping, fencing, etc.) have a useful life ranging from years. Some examples include: Out Buildings, Washrooms and Park Shade Structures years Parking Lots years Sports Fields/Courts years Trails Paths/Bridges years Line Fencing years INTEGRATED: Land and land improvements are integrated with roads, buildings, bridges & culverts, as well as, water and sewers. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Based on life cycle and visual inspections. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Assets are reviewed annually and maintenance, rehabilitation/renewal, and expansion activities scheduled as required in the 10 year plan. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: Land has an indefinite life cycle. However, there is a potential increase in maintenance and rehabilitation costs depending on the improvements involved. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: Land improvement rehabilitation forecasts should be compared to transportation infrastructure forecasts. The integration of projects occurs internally and externally. The Corporation of the Town of Aurora PSAB 3150 The Economic Value of Natural Capital Assets Report (June 2013) 49 P age Town of Aurora

55 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 ESTIMATED COST: Total Estimated Capital Cost for Ten Years Land Improvements, Replacement and Improvements is $8,338, P age Town of Aurora

56 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 URBAN FORESTRY & STREET TREES INVENTORY: The Town of Aurora currently maintains an extensive inventory of urban street trees totaling 18,273 trees. The Town of Aurora also has approximately 50ha of woodlot property. ANTICIPATED ASSET LIFE CYCLE: Due to locations and environmental impacts 0.85% of the street tree inventory requires replacement on an annual basis. Mortality of street trees is attributed to a number of factors including vehicle collision, insect/disease infestations and poor site conditions. Surviving street trees have a useful life ranging from years. Woodlands are ever changing and evolving life cycle although management must occur to ensure long term viability, diversity of species and public safety. INTEGRATED: Street Trees are integrated with roads and general urban streetscape, in conjunction with pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Woodlands are integrated with parks and public spaces. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT CRITERIA: Based on life cycle, environmental impacts, mechanical injury and visual inspections. REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT STRATEGY: Street Trees are inspected annually and pruned on a 6-year cycle, with replacement and removal though work order system. Rehabilitation / replacement of street trees based on historic service level and as required by newly emerging threats (i.e. Emerald Ash Borer) and are scheduled as required in the 10 year plan where possible. LIFE CYCLE CONSEQUENCES: Consequences include greater public liability risk with defective street trees, diminished quality of urban streetscape, reduced property values, increased maintenance costs and greater risk of further decline of urban forest due to a wide variety of environmental factors. INTEGRATED ASSET PRIORITIES: Street tree replacement and maintenance is based on a number of factors including: actual condition of the asset; the point in time within its life cycle; and the availability of resources to complete the necessary functions with minimal disruption to the program/service delivery The integration of projects occurs internally and externally. 51 P age Town of Aurora

57 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 CORPORATE/CONSULTING REPORTS ON SUBJECT: EAB Management Strategy Reports Aurora Woodlands Managed Forest Plan The Economic Value of Natural Capital Assets Report (June 2013) ESTIMATED COST: Total Estimated Capital Cost for Ten Years Urban Forestry / Street Trees Replacement and Improvements Broken down by: EAB Treatment $2,128,000 General Replacement/Maintenance $25, P age Town of Aurora

58 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 APPENDIX 2 ASSET INVENTORY REPORT With the reporting requirements of PSAB 3150, the Town of Aurora submits an inventory of all tracked assets that are owned and maintained by the town. These assets are categorized and required attributes are captured for each category to ensure that there is a proper valuation of the asset for future lifecycle purposes. The critical attribute fields submitted in the PSAB reports are listed below with descriptions and samples for each asset category. ROADS PAVEMENT AND CURBS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STR-RD STR-RD Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Location Description Assists with asset identification Catherine to Centre Mark Street to Batson Drive Road Length (m) Centreline length of the road Road Width (m) From edge to edge of asphalt Road Area (m2) Quantity retrieved from GIS Road Type Determined based on traffic volume and speed limit Local Local Right of Way Width From property line to property line Lane Count number of vehicle lanes on ROW 2 2 Date Constructed Year of last asphalt construction/remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ $ ; 53 P age Town of Aurora

59 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 SIDEWALKS & PATHS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STR-SW STR-SW Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Location Description Assists with asset identification Child Drive to Patrick Drive Patrick Drive to Murray Drive Length (m) Quantity retrieved from GIS Width (m) From edge to edge Area (m2) Based on length and width Defined material affects lifecycle and Material asset purpose Concrete Concrete Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; STREET LUMINAIRES Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STR-LI STR-LI Notes all projects that are involved with Project ID installation/improvements Pole Material Asset material, design, and/or function Trafalgar Trafalgar Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; SIGNAGE Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STR-SN STR-SN Notes all projects that are involved with Project ID installation/improvements MTO Code Regulatory reference type code RA-1 RA-1T Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $375.87; $41.76; 54 P age Town of Aurora

60 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 WATERMAIN SYSTEMS WATERMAINS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled WTR-LN WTR-LN Notes all projects that are involved with Project ID installation/improvements Length Quantity retrieved from GIS Diameter Size of watermain pipe diameter Material Defined material affects lifecycle and asset purpose Polyvinyl Chloride Polyvinyl Chloride Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full length remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; WATERMAIN VALVES Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled WTR-WV WTR-WV Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Diameter Size of watermain pipe diameter the valve is attached to Valve within Chamber Whether the valve is enclosed in an underground chamber or has an access box at grade No No Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 55 P age Town of Aurora

61 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 HYDRANTS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled WTR-HY WTR-HY Notes all projects that are involved with Project ID installation/improvements CP CP Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; WATER BOOSTER STATIONS Description Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled WTR-BS Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Control System Electrical control system used for monitoring/managing the pump facility 3 Phase Volts Pumps Size and quantity of pumps part of the facility 2-5", 1-6" Standby Generator Type and output of emergency generator 125 Kw Diesel Date Constructed Year of installation 1998 Life Span Estimated years of useful service 50 Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; 56 P age Town of Aurora

62 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 WASTEWATER SYSTEMS SANITARY SEWERS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled SAN-LN SAN-LN Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Length Quantity referenced from design schematic Diameter Size of sewer pipe diameter Depth Average depth of pipe below grade Material Defined material affects lifecycle and asset purpose Polyvinyl Chloride Concrete Pipe Upstream MH ID Reference ID for asset located at the upstream of the sewer SAN-MH SAN-MH Upstream Inverts Elevation of the sewer at the point of entry Downstream MH ID Downstream MH Inverts Reference ID for asset located at the downstream of the sewer SAN-MH SAN-MH Elevation of the sewer at the point of exit Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full length remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 57 P age Town of Aurora

63 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 MAINTENANCE CHAMBERS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled SAN-MH SAN-MH Notes all projects that are involved Project ID with installation/improvements Diameter Distance between the chamber walls Depth Full height of the structure Defined material affects lifecycle and Material asset purpose Brick Concrete-Precast Surface Elevation Elevation of the top of the structure Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full structural remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; $ ; SANITARY PUMPING STATIONS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled SAN-PS SAN-PS Notes all projects that are involved Project ID with installation/improvements Wet Well Total storage capacity m³ 4.52 m³ Control System Electrical control system used for monitoring/managing the pump facility 3 Phase Volts 3 Phase Volts Pumps Size and quantity of pumps part of the facility 2 - CP 3140 HT 2-4" Pumps Standby Generator Type and output of emergency generator 40 Kw Diesel 40 Kw Diesel Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/ improvement $ ; $ ; 58 P age Town of Aurora

64 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 STORMWATER SYSTEMS & CULVERTS STORM SEWERS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-LN STM-LN Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Length Quantity referenced from design schematic Diameter Size of sewer pipe diameter Depth Average depth of pipe below grade Material Defined material affects lifecycle and asset purpose Ribbed Polyvinyl Chloride (Ultra Rib) Ribbed Polyvinyl Chloride (Ultra Rib) Upstream MH ID Reference ID for asset located at the upstream of the sewer STM-MH STM-MH Upstream Inverts Elevation of the sewer at the point of entry Downstream MH ID Reference ID for asset located at the downstream of the sewer STM-MH STM-MH Downstream MH Inverts Elevation of the sewer at the point of exit Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full structural remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 59 P age Town of Aurora

65 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 MAINTENANCE CHAMBERS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-MH STM-MH Notes all projects that are involved Project ID with installation/improvements S S Diameter Distance between the chamber walls Depth Full height of the structure Defined material affects lifecycle and Material asset purpose Brick Concrete-Precast Surface Elevation Elevation of the top of the structure Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full structural remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; CATCHBASINS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-CB STM-CB Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Material Defined material affects lifecycle and asset purpose Concrete-Precast Concrete-Precast Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; $ ; 60 P age Town of Aurora

66 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 DRAIN COLLECTOR SEWERS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-DC STM-DC Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Quantity referenced from design Length scematic Diameter Size of sewer pipe diameter Depth Avereage depth of pipe below grade Defined material affects lifecycle and Material asset purpose Concrete Pipe Concrete Pipe Drain Type Defined function of sewer Foundation Drain Foundation Drain Upstream MH ID Reference ID for asset located at the upstream of the sewer SAN-MH SAN-MH Upstream Inverts Elevation of the sewer at the point of entry Downstream MH ID Reference ID for asset located at the downstream of the sewer SAN-MH SAN-MH Downstream Inverts Elevation of the sewer at the point of exit Date Constructed Year of installation Date Relined Year of full structural remediation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s Cost History construction/improvement $ ; $ ; STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PONDS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-PN STM-PN Notes all projects that are involved Project ID with installation/improvements Facility ID Reference ID to other projects NC11 NW1 Legal Land Parcel Parcel of land the pond can be found on PLAN 65M2873 PT BLK 26 & PLAN 65M3573 BLOCK 274 PLAN 65M2781 PT LOT 78; 65R20120 PART 59 Area (m2) Quantity retrieved from GIS Facility Type Typical pond functionality Wet Pond Wet Pond Date Constructed Year of installation Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 61 P age Town of Aurora

67 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 BRIDGES & CULVERTS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-CV STM-CV Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Type Defined by whether there is fill on the structure or not Culvert Bridge Material Dimensions Defined material affects lifecycle and asset purpose Record measurements of the various dimensions of the culvert Large Steel Culvert 10'1" X 15'6" CSPA, Stone Arches Large Concrete Culvert 19.0m wide by 638.4m long bridge structure on John West Way Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; CONTINUOUS DEFLECTIVE SEPARATION & OIL-GRIT SEPARATOR UNITS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-OG STM-OG Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Make Defines filter function/configuration Continuous Deflective Separation Continuous Deflective Separation Model Specific model numbers set by manufacturer Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 62 P age Town of Aurora

68 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 HEADWALLS Description Sample Sample ID Unique identifier - not to be recycled STM-OF STM-OF Project ID Notes all projects that are involved with installation/improvements Outflow Diameter Diameter of sewer pipe(s) that outfall at the headwall Date Constructed Year of installation Life Span Estimated years of useful service Cost History Costs incurred by the town or estimated values for the asset s construction/improvement $ ; $ ; 63 P age Town of Aurora

69 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 APPENDIX 3 - DETAILED 10-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS REVENUE (INCLUDING INFLATION) Line of Credit - 17,048, Special Purpose Reserves Repair & Replacement Reserve Growth & New Reserves Water / Sewer / Storm Reserves Development Changes 325,500 1,164, ,500 1,644, , , , , ,000 10,000 4,754,200 4,848,200 3,998,159 3,942, ,314 2,343,334 2,386, ,032 3,501,143 7,962,789 2,380, ,000 1,050,629 1,376, , , , ,555-15,000 15, , ,812 3,657,300 2,888,200 4,007,700,724,332 1,500, ,000 2,926,700 4,097,086 2,641,092 1,147, ,100 16,296,100 16,416,334 4,475,042 6,425,696 7,452,000 3,387, , ,000 2,970,000 5,180,299 Grants 2,134,600 1,540,515 1,617,541 1,617,541 1,694,566 1,694,566 1,694,566 1,694,566 1,694,566 1,694,566 1,694,566 External Funding 3,245, , Other Revenue - 120,000 2,800, ,000 2,000, Operating Revenues 4,957,388 5,230,126 5,516,000 6,625,400 6,714,900 6,806,100 6,899,100 6,993,900 7,091,400 7,189,870 7,290,000 17,224,100 51,750,098 35,436,860 22,833,006 20,531,752 20,940,000 16,271,872 12,948,198 17,169,195 23,188,317 18,279, P age Town of Aurora

70 Asset Management Plan (DRAFT) 2014 CAPITAL COSTS (NO INFLATION) Storm Water Management 56, , Wastwater Management - 250, ,000-2,478, Water Management 729,500 1,710,000 1,300,000 1,800, ,000 1,600, ,000 1,600, ,000 1,600, ,000 Facilities 3,690,500 27,322,208 16,484,600 5,257,300 6,560,900 7,354,200 2,281,700 1,326,700 1,085,000 1,110, ,000 Fleet & Equipment 964,200 1,728, ,000 1,474,000 1,207, ,600 1,272, , , , ,400 Roads 5,832,400 12,125,390 7,087,360 6,564,506 5,429,952 3,211,162 5,989, ,798 6,611,795 8,353,087 8,486,081 Land, Parkland, Land Improvements 995,000 4,830,000 4,670,300 4,745,600 2,105,900 3,071,300 1,631,600 1,641, ,000 4,387, ,000 12,267,700 48,316,398 30,384,260 19,841,406 16,454,152 15,867,262 14,552,748 5,954,298 10,078,795 16,150,587 11,091,481 OPERATING COSTS - MAINTENANCE (NO INFLATION) Storm Water Management 286, , , , , , , , , , ,000 Wastwater Management 480, , , , , , , , , , ,600 Water Management 1,129,000 1,156,000 1,232,900 1,255,000 1,274,700 1,294,700 1,315,000 1,335,600 1,356,400 1,377,600 1,399,100 Facilities 809, , , , , , , , , , ,400 Fleet & Equipment 587, , , , , , , , , , ,400 Roads 1,308,200 1,368,700 1,470,800 2,523,700 2,563,200 2,603,500 2,644,600 2,686,600 2,729,300 2,773,000 2,817,500 Land, Parkland, Land Improvements 355, , , , , , , , , , ,000 CASH SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 4,956,400 5,229,200 5,516,000 6,625,400 6,714,900 6,806,100 6,899,100 6,993,900 7,090,400 7,188,800 7,289,000 - (1,795,500) (463,400) 3,633,800) (2,637,300) (1,733,362) (5,179,976) - - (151,070) (101,000) TOTAL DEFICIT (15,695,408) 65 P age Town of Aurora

71

72 TABS: 10 Year Capital Investment Plan 2013 Budget and 10 Year Outlook (2014 to 2023) TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary.. Pages 1 to 11 "Repair & Replacement" of Existing Infrastructure Summary of "R & R" Capital Requirements with Funding Summary Page 14 Detailed Investment Plan by Responsibility Area Pages 15 to 39 "Growth & New" Tangible Assets Summary of "G & N" Capital Requirements with Funding Summary Page 41 Detailed Investment Plan by Responsibility Area Pages 42 to 51 "Studies & Other" Non-tangible Assets Summary of "S & O" Capital Requirements with Funding Summary Page 53 Detailed Investment Plan by Responsibility Area Pages 54 to 58 Funding Sources / Reserve Forecasts / Cash Flows Detailed Funding Sources Pages 60 to 63 Tax Supported "R & R" Assets - Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Pages 64 to 70 Utility Rate Supported "R & R" Assets - Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Page 71 Growth & New Assets - Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Page 72 Studies & Other Assets - Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Page 73 Development Charges Capital Funding Requirements Detail Page 74 Total Development Charges Funding Requirements Page 77 Consolidated Development Charges Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Page 78 Individual Development Charges Reserve Forecast & Cash Flow Pages 79 to 87

73 10 YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 2013 Budget and 10 Year Outlook (2014 to 2023) "The 10 Year Capital Investment Plan serves as a roadmap for staff and Council when considering not only the spending of money to buy new, or maintain its capital existing assets, but also to plan for the projects' long term funding so that the money is available when needed." Other than the identified 2013 budget items, council has not approved or endorsed any of the specific items in the plan. The document is to be used as a reference tool only, and represents a consolidation of views of various staff members responsible for maintaining assets and services. Other than library facilities, the document does not include any Library Board projects.

74 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 INTRODUCTION The Town currently owns close to five hundred million dollars in assets comprised of roads; bridges; buildings; parks; underground water, wastewater and storm water infrastructure; streetlights; and vehicles, etc. This investment needs to be protected through planning for the repair or replacement of these assets to properly maintain them; and equally as important is the planning for the funding for these projects. The Year Capital Investment Plan (total of 11 years to 2023) identifies almost 400 projects with a total capital expenditure of $179,770,300. Of this, almost 400 projects relate to Repair and/or Replacement ('R&R') of existing infrastructure representing $89,374,200 or 49.7% of the total plan's dollars; almost 100 projects relate to Growth Related or New Assets ('G&N'), representing $86,495,100 or 48.1% of of the total plan's dollars; and less than 20 projects relate to Studies and Other projects ('S&O'), representing $3,901,000 or 2.2% of the total plan's dollars. R&R $89,374.2 S&O $3,901.0 G&N $86,495.1 The expenditures are not spread equally over the 11 year period, with major G&N projects in 2013, 2015 and 2016 influencing the phasing: 30, , ,000.0 G&N S&O R&R 15, , , Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 1

75 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 R & R PROJECTS As can be seen from the previous graph, R&R projects are fairly constant year to year, a reasonable assumption considering the nature of the expenditure. The following is the 11 year category breakdown of the $89.4 million R&R expenditure: Water & Wastewater 7.9% Roads & Related 50.1% All Other 2.7% Storm Water Mgmt 5.3% Town Hall Reno 5.6% Other Facilities 13.6% Fleet 6.7% Parks & Rec 8.1% Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 2

76 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 G & N PROJECTS There are a number of significant new projects identified throughout the 11 year's of the Long Term Capital Investment Plan. These include $16,482,000 for a new Joint Operations Centre (a two year project beginning in 2013), a $15,250,000 3 year project beginning in 2015 for the design and construction of a new recreation facility, $7,440,000 for a 3 year project for a new Library branch (starting in 2014), and $1,500,000 for a new artificial ice rink in In addition to these specific large projects there are 5 new roads projects with a value of $3,588,300; 16 new sidewalks projects totalling $7,048,600; and 35 Parks & Recreation projects, including new Trails, a Skate Board Park, new court facilities, and a number of pedestrian rail crossings associated with the Trail Network, all totalling $19,871,900. The following is the 11 year category breakdown of the $86.5 million G&N expenditure: Library Branch 9% Artificial Ice Rink 2% Other Parks & Rec 23% New Recreation facility 18% Joint Ops Centre 19% All Other 11% Roads 4% Sidewalks 8% Fire Vehicle & Facilities 7% Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 3

77 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 S & O PROJECTS Over the 11 years of the Long Term Capital Investment Plan there are 17 projects totalling $3,901,000. These include 2 updates of the Town's Strategic Plan (2016 & 2021); 2 updates of the Development Charges Background Study (2013 and 2018); a Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery Study (2014); an I.T. Strategic Plan (2014); 2 Official Plan Reviews (2016 and 2020), along with a series of growth related planning studies. In addition, I.E.S. is planning a number of studies in the transportation and environmental areas as well as $800,000 in Water and Wastewater related studies. Parks and Recreation is planning studies on parks maintenance standards, urban forests, culture, and an update of the Town's tree inventory. By Department, the S&O Project's $3,901,000 is anticipated to be spread as follows: Administration $ % Planning 1, % I.E.S. 1, % Parks and recreation % $ 3,901.0 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 4

78 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 MAJOR PROJECT FUNDING As mentioned above, there are major NEW projects that tend to smooth out the values in the funding model - they are: Joint New New Operations Rec Library Centre Facility Branch TOTAL Funding from Development Charges 5, , , ,483.8 Funding from Proceeds of Land Sales 10, ,000.0 Funding from Water/Wastewater Reserves 1, ,138.0 Funding from Engineering Fees Funding from Growth & New Reserve - 1, , , , , , ,172.0 FUNDING and RESERVES As shown graphically on Page 1 of this Executive Summary, the funding requirement varies significantly by year, through the period of the Long Term Capital Investment Plan. This is a problem for a municipality that must collect its main source of revenue (Property Tax) relatively consistently from year to year and wanting to avoid tax rate fluctuations due to capital needs. This problem is overcome by smoothing the funds coming from taxation through the use of Reserves which act as a "buffer". The other issue is one of ensuring the Town has the required funding when it is needed. Annually updating the longer term capital planning is crucial in meeting this need. The Town has embarked on a program of funding the Infrastructure Reserves from each year's operating budget. This annual amount has approval to grow each year by a variable percentage % of the prior year's Town-only Tax Levy. This method insures a steady (albeit growing) and consistent source of funds going to the Infrastructure Reserves, so that long term capital planning and resultant spending is possible. This variable percentage, by year: % 0.60% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% It should be noted that in addition to internal sources, capital funding sources also include government grants (Federal Gas Tax, the federal government's "Action Plan" being examples), Development Charges, and certain Planning and Engineering Fees charged to developers, although these other sources are usually used for Growth & New projects. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 5

79 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 FUNDING and RESERVES (continued) In this 2013 Long Term Capital Investment Plan, the following shows the requirement for funding from the Infrastructure Reserve accounts, which are in turn funded through the annual "Cash to Capital" coming from the operating budget. (values shown are in thousands of dollars) TOTAL Total Capital Funding 28, , , , , , , , , , , ,770.3 External Sources (24,094.6) (11,126.7) (18,873.3) (20,809.4) (12,134.3) (9,061.3) (7,035.0) (7,727.7) (6,336.6) (5,193.8) (7,095.2) (129,487.9) from 'Cash to Cap' Reserves 3, , , , , , , , , , , ,282.4 Region / Newmarket Funding 2.1% Rates Based Reserves 14.2% Fed/Prov Grants 9.6% 'Cash to Cap' Reserves 28.0% Sale of Land Proceeds 7.8% Special Purposes Reserves 3.3% Development Charges 34.6% Other External Funding 0.5% Using the "buffer" provided by Reserve Accounts results in Reserve Account Continuity that looks like this: TOTAL Opening Reserve Value 6, , , , , , , , , , , , Cash to Capital 3, , , , , , , , , , , , % of Prior Tax Levy , Interest on Reserve Bal Minus Capital Spend (3,987.5) (4,277.8) (6,892.4) (4,552.8) (3,428.1) (4,344.2) (4,014.5) (3,476.0) (3,805.1) (4,058.7) (7,445.3) (50,282.4) Closing Reserve Value 6, , , , , , , , , , , ,265.3 This is shown graphically on the following page and, in more detail, on page 11 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 6

80 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 FUNDING and RESERVES (continued) , , , , Annual Capital Spend Closing Reserve Balance Annual Contribution to Reserves As shown above, funding from the annual operating budget is more than adequate to fund the capital spend requirement, as the balance in the Infrastructure Reserves grows by $2.95 million dollars to a level which is twice the average capital spend over the previous 11 years. Given the economic uncertainty of 10 years hence, this "contingency fund" for the unknown future does provide the town with the necessary assurance of its long term infrastructure viability. However, unforeseen economic events may necessitate a change in the funding formula. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 7

81 Pg Ref TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL CAPITAL SPEND REQUESTS Base (Approved) 10 YEAR OUTLOOK REPAIR and REPLACEMENT PROJECTS Administration 15-2, , , ,000.0 Corp & Financial ,318.8 Building / By-law Roads & Related 19 3, , , , , , , , , , ,269.0 Water Projects , ,630.0 Wastewater Projects Stormwater Projects ,500.0 Parks & Recreation , , ,938.6 Facilities 32 1, , , , , , , , ,482.9 Fleet , ,453.0 Accessibility Projects , , , , , , , , , , , ,892.3 Total including ,374.2 GROWTH and NEW PROJECTS Administration Customer / Legislative Corp & Financial Building / By-law Fire & Emergency 46-1, , ,804.0 I.E.S. 47 4, , , , , ,134.4 Parks & Recreation 48 1, , , , , , , ,271.0 Facilities 50 13, , , , , ,505.5 Fleet ,255.0 Planning & Dev , , , , , , , , , ,129.9 Total including ,495.1 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 8

82 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL CAPITAL SPEND REQUESTS - continued Base (Approved) 10 YEAR OUTLOOK STUDIES and OTHER PROJECTS Administration Corp & Financial Planning ,700.0 I.E.S ,440.0 Parks & Recreation ,666.0 Total including ,901.0 TOTAL FUNDING REQUIREMENT Share Administration 3.3% , , , ,064.0 Customer / Legislative 0.2% Corp & Financial 1.2% ,828.8 Building / By-law 0.5% Fire & Emergency 3.8% - 1, , ,804.0 Planning 1.1% ,710.0 Total I.E.S. 43.2% 9, , , , , , , , , , , ,523.4 Parks & Recreation 16.7% 1, , , , , , , , , , ,311.6 Facilities 25.0% 15, , , , , , , , , , , ,988.4 Fleet 4.4% , ,708.0 Accessibility Projects 0.5% , , , , , , , , , , , ,688.2 Total including ,770.3 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 9

83 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 SOURCES OF FUNDING Base 10 YEAR OUTLOOK (approved) Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total Capital Needs: Repair & Replacement 7, , , , , , , , , , , ,892.3 Growth & New 20, , , , , , , , , ,129.9 Studies & Other ,666.0 TOTAL CAPITAL NEEDS 28, , , , , , , , , , , ,688.2 CONSOLIDATED FUNDING SOURCES: Total including ,770.3 R & R Reserve - Tax (3,237.8) (2,878.7) (4,247.5) (2,707.2) (2,961.0) (3,705.5) (3,796.5) (3,381.2) (3,758.1) (3,963.7) (7,170.3) (38,569.7) Growth & New Reserve (675.2) (1,358.6) (2,644.9) (1,783.6) (397.1) (329.2) (218.0) (66.8) (15.0) (25.0) (25.0) (6,863.2) Studies & Other Reserve (74.5) (40.5) - (62.0) (70.0) (309.5) - (28.0) (32.0) (70.0) (250.0) (862.0) Cash to Capital Sourced (3,987.5) (4,277.8) (6,892.4) (4,552.8) (3,428.1) (4,344.2) (4,014.5) (3,476.0) (3,805.1) (4,058.7) (7,445.3) (46,294.9) R & R Reserve - Rates (2,798.3) (1,054.1) (2,303.7) (2,261.7) (4,275.4) (1,676.0) (1,557.0) (850.0) (3,579.1) (3,268.8) (1,898.2) (22,724.0) Development Charges (8,953.6) (2,841.9) (10,523.1) (15,693.0) (5,744.9) (5,370.3) (3,460.0) (5,138.2) (1,010.0) (495.0) (2,970.0) (53,246.4) Development / Sale of Land (8,030.9) (3,919.1) (1,800.0) (250.0) (5,969.1) Special Purposes Reserves * (see below) (1,116.9) (304.6) (432.5) (952.5) (659.0) (615.0) (490.0) (317.5) (247.5) (30.0) (705.0) (4,753.6) Federal / Provincial Grants (2,006.8) (2,044.0) (1,400.0) (1,591.2) (1,455.0) (1,400.0) (1,528.0) (1,422.0) (1,500.0) (1,400.0) (1,522.0) (15,262.2) External Gov't Funding (277.1) (963.0) (2,414.0) (61.0) (3,438.0) Other External Funding (911.0) TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES (28,082.1) (15,404.5) (25,765.7) (25,362.2) (15,562.4) (13,405.5) (11,049.5) (11,203.7) (10,141.7) (9,252.5) (14,540.5) (151,688.2) Total including 2013 (179,770.3) * Special Purposes Reserves: Engineering Fees (240.9) (59.1) (59.1) Building Dept - (75.0) (100.0) (500.0) (675.0) Cash in Lieu of Parkland (714.2) (170.5) (332.5) (452.5) (659.0) (615.0) (490.0) (317.5) (247.5) (30.0) (705.0) (4,019.5) Council Discretionary Res (120.0) Accessibility Committee (1.8) (1,116.9) (304.6) (432.5) (952.5) (659.0) (615.0) (490.0) (317.5) (247.5) (30.0) (705.0) (4,753.6) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 10

84 TEN YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN to 2023 TAX FUNDED RESERVE BALANCE CONTINUITY / CASH FLOW Opening Reserve Balances: R & R Reserves - Tax 4, , , , , , , , , , ,017.6 Growth & New Reserve 1, , (1,675.8) (2,829.0) (2,573.8) (2,219.0) (1,719.5) (1,033.3) (257.7) Studies & Other Reserve Opening Reserve Balances 6, , , , , , , , , , ,877.0 Reserve 'Revenue': Cash to Capital (Base) 3, , , , , , , , , , ,517.1 Annual 1% Tax Levy Increase Total from Operating Budget 3, , , , , , , , , , ,708.5 Reserve Balance Interest Total Revenue/Funding 3, , , , , , , , , , ,833.6 Annual Capital Spend: R & R Reserve - Tax 3, , , , , , , , , , ,170.3 Growth & New Reserve , , , Studies & Other Reserve Annual Capital Spend 3, , , , , , , , , , ,445.3 Closing Reserve Balances: R & R Reserve - Tax 4, , , , , , , , , , ,703.8 Growth & New Reserve 1, (1,675.8) (2,829.0) (2,573.8) (2,219.0) (1,719.5) (1,033.3) (257.7) ,389.1 Studies & Other Reserve Closing Reserve Balance: 6, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Annual Capital Spend Closing Reserve Balance Annual Contribution to Reserves Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Summary Page 11

85 10 YEAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 2013 Budget and 10 Year Outlook (2014 to 2023) REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 2013 to 2023 = $89,374,200 (see PAGE 13) GROWTH & NEW 2013 to 2023 = $86,495,100 (see PAGE 41) STUDIES & OTHER 2013 to 2023 = $3,901,000 (see PAGE 53) Total Investment Value for 2013 to 2023 = $179,770,300 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Page 12

86 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT ASSETS ( Anticipated Spend of $89,374,200 over 11 years ) Specific Repair & Replacement Assets are at the following pages: REPAIR & REPLACEMENT SUMMARY Page 14 Office of the C.A.O. Page 15 Customer & Legislative Services Page 16 Corporate & Financial Services Page 17 Roads & Related Page 18 Water / Sanitary / Storm Page 25 Parks & Recreation Services Page 28 Facilities Page 31 Fleet Page 36 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Page 13

87 REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT INVESTMENT PLAN - SUMMARY OF CAPITAL NEEDS (Approved) 10 YEAR OUTLOOK TOTAL R & R INVESTMENTS C.A.O. - 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000, ,000,000 C.F.S. 307, ,200 82,800 58,400 55,600 42,900 44, , , ,600 55,600 1,318,800 B.B.S Roads & Related 3,481,000 2,857,800 4,765,600 4,414,300 3,177,900 3,782,300 2,938, ,900 4,895,000 6,157,900 7,317,900 41,269,000 Water Projects 883, , , ,000 1,350, , , , , ,000 5,630,000 Wastewater Projects , , ,000 Stormwater Projects 250, , , , , , , , , , ,000 4,500,000 P.R.S. 290, , , ,300 1,135, , , , , ,000 1,207,000 6,938,600 Facilities 1,675, , , ,600 1,205,300 1,099,400 1,144,200 2,223,200 1,086,700 1,035,000 1,060,000 10,482,900 Fleet 545, , , , , , ,000 1,024, , , ,000 5,453,000 Accessibility Projects 50, , ,000 50, ,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, ,000 7,481,900 7,645,200 9,863,700 7,402,600 8,846,400 6,936,500 6,969,500 5,795,700 9,009,700 8,432,500 10,990,500 81,892,300 Total including ,374,200 Funding Sources: R&R - Tax Based (3,237,800) (2,878,700) (4,247,500) (2,707,200) (2,961,000) (3,705,500) (3,796,500) (3,381,200) (3,758,100) (3,963,700) (7,170,300) (38,569,700) R&R - Water Rates (1,204,700) (455,000) (1,206,100) (1,010,000) (1,998,800) (512,300) (850,000) (150,000) (1,718,100) (1,311,300) (1,044,400) (10,256,000) R&R - Sewer Rates (228,200) (25,000) (35,600) (116,800) (1,041,300) (162,100) - - (881,800) (42,000) (110,400) (2,415,000) R&R -Storm Rates (449,500) (250,000) (962,000) (1,134,900) (1,035,300) (1,001,600) (600,000) (600,000) (979,200) (1,715,500) (743,400) (9,021,900) Proceeds of Land Sale - (1,950,000) (1,800,000) (250,000) (4,000,000) Cash in Lieu - Parkland - (42,500) (112,500) (92,500) (355,000) (155,000) (195,000) (242,500) (172,500) - (400,000) (1,767,500) EAB Reserve (40,000) Federal Gas Tax (1,408,900) (2,044,000) (1,400,000) (1,591,200) (1,455,000) (1,400,000) (1,528,000) (1,422,000) (1,500,000) (1,400,000) (1,522,000) (15,262,200) Accessibility Committee (1,800) Building Reserve - - (100,000) (500,000) (600,000) Growth & New Reserves Grants / Donations (911,000) (7,481,900) (7,645,200) (9,863,700) (7,402,600) (8,846,400) (6,936,500) (6,969,500) (5,795,700) (9,009,700) (8,432,500) (10,990,500) (81,892,300) Total including 2013 (89,374,200) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Summary Page 14

88 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - OFFICE OF THE C.A.O (approved) Project Total Repair & Replacement Aurora Town Hall Renovation - 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000, ,000,000-2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000, ,000,000 Funding Sources: Aurora Town Hall Renovation: Building Reserve - - (100,000) (500,000) (600,000) Water & Sewer R & R - (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (150,000) Facilities R & R - - (50,000) (200,000) (250,000) Proceeds of Land Sale - (1,950,000) (1,800,000) (250,000) (4,000,000) Growth & New (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (1,000,000) (5,000,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R CAO Page 15

89 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - CUSTOMER & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES (Approved) Project Total Customer & Legislative Services Accessibility Committee (12002): 50, , ,000 50, ,000 50, ,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, ,000 Cenotaph Lanbert Accessible Audible Website Ramp Wilson Park Trail & Park Pedestrian redesign to Path Paving Equipment Signal WCG AA AODA Barrier Free Audible Compliance Doors AFLC Pedestrian (Platform & Signal Content) Accessible Lighting Machel Pk 50, , ,000 50, ,000 50, ,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, ,000 Funding Sources: Accessibility Advisor Committee (1,800) (1,800) Special R & R Reserve (48,200) (100,000) (150,000) (50,000) (150,000) (50,000) (200,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (948,200) (50,000) (100,000) (150,000) (50,000) (150,000) (50,000) (200,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (950,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R CLS Page 16

90 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - CORPORATE & FINANCIAL SERVICES (Approved) Project Total Corporate & Financial Services Desktops & Notebooks 52,800 Servers 130,000 Network equipment & Hardware 15, ,200 82,800 58,400 55,600 42,900 44, ,000 76,100 59,600 55, ,600 Office Equipment (Projector, etc.) - Telecommunication - Financial System Optimization 110, ,000 Financial System Upgrade , , , ,200 82,800 58, ,600 42,900 44, ,000 76,100 59,600 55,600 1,626,600 Funding Sources: Information Technology R & R Reserve (307,800) (103,200) (82,800) (58,400) (655,600) (42,900) (44,600) (140,000) (76,100) (59,600) (55,600) (1,626,600) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R CFS Page 17

91 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - CORPORATE & FINANCIAL SERVICES Supplemental Detail - "Evergreening" (Approved) "Evergreening" Detail: Early PC's $1,100) 52, , to 2006 PC's $1,100) - 18, , PC's $1,100) - 34, , PC's $1,100) , , PC's $1,100) , , PC's $1,100) , , PC's $1,100) , , PC's $1,100) , , PC's $1,100) ,400 48,400 Laptops for Training $1,300) - 10,400-10, Laptops $1,300) , , ,800-23, Laptops $1,300) , , ,400-70, P & R Tablets - $1,200) , , ,200-21, P & R Tablets - $1,200) ,200 1,200-2, I.E.S. Tablets - $1,200) , , ,200 21,600 Server Replacements: London - 10, ,000 Paris - 10, ,000 Rome , ,000 GIS , ,000 Finance , ,000 Other 130, ,000 Replacement of CISCO switches etc 15,000 20,000 20,000 20, ,000-20,000 20, , , ,200 82,800 58,400 55,600 42,900 44, ,000 76,100 59,600 55, ,600 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R CFS Page 17a

92 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED (Approved) Project Total Yonge St LED Traffic Lights Road Const'n 21, ,000 Proj Water Service Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL 21, ,000 Reconstruction Proj (31101): Road Const'n Vandorf Sideroad Water Service Included in GROWTH and NEW Category Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL Combined Recon Proj (31102): Road Const'n 1,193, ,193,700 Hunters Glen Road Water Service Fox Point Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL 1,193, ,193,700 Combined Recon Proj (31103): Road Const'n , ,800 Centre Street - Yonge to Walton Water Service , ,100 Sanitary Sewer , ,600 Storm Sewer , ,000 TOTAL - - 1,053, ,053,500 Reconstruction Proj (31110): Road Const'n Wellington St E. Entrance Water Service Included in GROWTH and NEW Category Features Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL Combined Recon Proj (31099): Road Const'n 885, ,600 George St. Water Service 321, ,600 Tyler Sanitary Sewer 215, ,800 (Fed Gas Tax Funding of $885,600) Storm Sewer 191, ,100 TOTAL 1,614, ,614,100 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 19

93 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total Combined Recon Proj (31080): Road Const'n 537, ,200 Hilldale Road Water Service Hillside Court Sanitary Sewer 12, ,400 Kenlea Court Storm Sewer (Fed Gas Tax Funding of $523,300) TOTAL 549, ,600 Combined Recon Proj (31079): Road Const'n 94,200 1,958, ,053,000 Elderberry Trail (Part) Water Service Houdini Way Sanitary Sewer Springmaple Chase Storm Sewer 8, , ,400 TOTAL 102,600 2,108, ,211,400 Combined Recon Proj (31096): Road Const'n - 122,800 2,454, ,577,600 Bluegrass Drive Water Service Skyview Lane Sanitary Sewer Steeplechase Ave. Storm Sewer , ,000 TOTAL - 122,800 2,604, ,727,600 Combined Recon Proj (31105): Road Const'n , , ,600 Haida Dr. (section) Water Service , ,900 Trillium Dr. Sanitary Sewer , ,200 Storm Sewer , ,200 TOTAL , , ,900 Combined Recon Proj (31108): Road Const'n , , ,200 Haida Dr. (section) Water Service , ,900 Algonquin Cres. Sanitary Sewer , ,000 Woodsend Cres. Storm Sewer , ,100 TOTAL ,600 1,671, ,755,200 Combined Recon Proj (31109): Road Const'n , , ,100 Kennedy Street West Water Service , ,800 Temperance Street Sanitary Sewer , ,300 Storm Sewer , ,400 TOTAL ,000 2,099, ,204,600 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 20

94 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total Brookland Reconstruction Road Const'n , , ,600 Water Service , ,200 Sanitary Sewer , ,800 Storm Sewer , ,600 TOTAL , , ,200 Catherine Avenue Road Const'n , , ,400 Reconstruction Water Service Sanitary Sewer , ,800 Storm Sewer TOTAL , , ,200 Combined Recon Proj (31112): Road Const'n ,500 1,044, ,140,300 Industrial Parkway North Water Service , ,300 Industrial Parkway South Sanitary Sewer , ,700 Industry Street Storm Sewer , ,100 TOTAL ,500 1,909, ,005,400 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,900 1,696, ,784,400 Murray Drive-Golf Links Drive Water Service Pinehurst Court Sanitary Sewer , ,400 Storm Sewer , ,500 TOTAL ,900 1,757, ,845,300 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n , , ,700 Ransom Court Water Service , ,000 Ransom Street Sanitary Sewer , ,000 Storm Sewer , ,900 TOTAL , , ,600 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,500 2,101, ,312,700 Edward Street Water Service , ,100 Dunning Avenue Sanitary Sewer , ,800 Storm Sewer , ,200 TOTAL ,500 4,230, ,441,800 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 21

95 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,300 1,206,400 1,270,700 Corbett Crescent Water Service Cossar Drive Sanitary Sewer ,900 24,900 Springburn Crescent Storm Sewer ,800 54,800 TOTAL ,300 1,286,100 1,350,400 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,400 1,605,800-1,769,200 Browning Court Water Service , ,700 Johnson Road Sanitary Sewer ,500-23,500 Holman Crescent Storm Sewer , ,900 TOTAL ,400 3,266,900-3,430,300 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,000 1,172,200-1,296,200 Adair Drive Water Service , ,600 Bailey Crescent Sanitary Sewer ,500-18,500 Davidson Road Storm Sewer , ,600 TOTAL ,000 2,479,900-2,603,900 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n , , ,000 Aurora Heights Drive Water Service Sanitary Sewer ,800 12,800 Storm Sewer ,000 32,000 TOTAL , , ,800 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,200 1,082,900 1,141,100 Crawford Rose Drive Water Service Valley Crescent Sanitary Sewer ,700 22,700 Storm Sewer ,000 59,000 TOTAL ,200 1,164,600 1,222,800 Golf Links Reconstruction Road Const'n ,100 1,100,400 1,158,500 Water Service Sanitary Sewer ,100 24,100 Storm Sewer ,400 38,400 TOTAL ,100 1,162,900 1,221,000 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 22

96 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total Orchard Heights Blvd. Road Const'n ,900 73,900 Reconstruction Water Service Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL ,900 73,900 Combined Recon Proj (?????): Road Const'n ,000 1,529,500 1,647,500 Henderson Drive Water Service , ,400 Poplar Crescent Sanitary Sewer ,900 25,900 Storm Sewer , ,200 TOTAL ,000 2,359,000 2,477,000 Windham Trail Road Const'n ,600 51,600 Reconstruction Water Service Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL ,600 51,600 TOTAL MAJOR ROAD Road Const'n 2,731,700 2,081,600 3,130,900 2,387,600 1,059,100 2,741, ,500 2,388,600 3,124,100 5,949,200 25,805,600 RECONSTRUCTION Water Service 321, , , , , ,100 1,311, ,400 4,872,600 ROAD RESURFACING Sanitary Sewer 228,200-10,600 41, , , ,800 42, ,400 2,018,200 Storm Sewer 199, , , , , , ,200 1,615, ,400 4,721,400 TOTAL 3,481,000 2,231,600 3,834,600 3,649,300 2,684,500 3,667, ,500 4,517,700 6,092,900 7,047,400 37,417,800 April Gdns / Kemano-Crawford Rose - 108, ,500 Haida / McDonald-Aurora Hts , ,000 McDonald / Wellington-Haida , ,900 Mosley / Yonge-Berczy , ,000 Murray / Seaton-Yonge , ,200 Cranberry Ln / Trillium-Highland Gate , ,400 Wiles Ct / Murray to end , ,000 Lamont / Wellington-Metcalf , ,900 Victoria / Wellington-Metcalf , ,900 Wells / Wellington-Metcalf , ,400 Metcalf / Victoria - Metcalf , ,000 Mary St / Wellington-Industry , ,400 Industrial / N of Scanlon-S of Industry ,000 2,300, ,350,000 TOTAL ROAD RESURFACING - 108, , , ,400 50,000 2,845, , , ,120,600 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 23

97 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total SIDEWALK & BOULEVARD Gurnett / Harrison-Cousins - 104, ,000 April Gdns / Kemano-Crawford Rose - 106, ,000 TOTAL SIDEWALK & BOULEVARD - 210, ,000 SIDEWALK REHAB / REPAIR Henderson / Tammarack-Poplar , ,000 St John's / gateway-industrial Pkwy , ,100 TOTAL SIDEWALK REHAB & REPAIR , ,100 NEW SIDEWALKS Murray / Kennedy-225m North - 57, ,700 Edward / Firehall-Dunning , ,800 Henderson / Bathurst-Watts Meadow , ,500 Edward / 100m E of Yonge-Dunning , , ,500 TOTAL NEW SIDEWALK - 57, , , , , ,500 OTHER Intersection - Wellington/John West - 100, ,000 Intersection - St John's/Bathurst - 100, ,000 Retaining Wall - Yonge St (poured) , ,000 Retaining Wall - Wellington & George , , ,000 Retaining Wall Rehabilitations ,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, ,000 Street Light Conversion to L.E.D ,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15, ,000 Street Light Poles St John's/Bayview - 50, ,000 Field Asset Data Wireless Devices , ,000 TOTAL OTHER - 250, , ,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 1,090,000 TOTAL ROADS & RELATED Road Const'n 2,731,700 2,707,800 4,061,900 3,152,600 1,552,500 2,856,300 2,938, ,900 2,765,900 3,189,100 6,219,700 33,137,800 Water Service 321, , , , , ,100 1,311, ,400 4,872,600 Sanitary Sewer 228,200-10,600 41, , , ,800 42, ,400 2,018,200 Storm Sewer 199, , , , , , ,200 1,615, ,400 4,721,400 TOTAL 3,481,000 2,857,800 4,765,600 4,414,300 3,177,900 3,782,300 2,938, ,900 4,895,000 6,157,900 7,317,900 44,750,000 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 24

98 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - ROADS & RELATED - continued (Approved) Project Total TOTAL ROADS & RELATED FUNDING SOURCES: Federal Gas Tax: Combined Recon Proj (31080) Reconstruction (523,300) (523,300) Combined Recon Proj (31099) Reconstruction (885,600) (885,600) Combined Recon Proj (31079) Reconstruction - (1,200,000) (1,200,000) Combined Recon Proj (31096) Reconstruction - - (1,400,000) (1,400,000) Combined Recon Proj (31105) Reconstruction (638,600) (638,600) Combined Recon Proj (31108) Reconstruction (752,600) (752,600) Combined Recon Proj (31107) Reconstruction (200,000) (200,000) Combined Recon Proj (31109) Reconstruction (653,100) (653,100) Combined Recon Proj (31112) Reconstruction (95,500) (500,000) (595,500) Combined Recon Proj (31114) Reconstruction (222,600) (222,600) Cranberry Ln / Trillium-Highland Resurfacing (428,400) (428,400) Combined Recon Proj (31113) Reconstruction (900,000) (900,000) Industrial / N of Scanlon-S of Industry Resurfacing (1,500,000) (1,500,000) Edward / 100m E of Yonge-Dunning Sidewalk (28,000) (279,500) (307,500) Edward / Dunning Reconstruction (211,500) (1,500,000) - - (1,711,500) Mosley / Yonge-Berczy Resurfacing (270,000) (270,000) Lamont / Wellington-Metcalf Resurfacing (135,800) (135,800) Browning Court, Johnson, Holman Reconstruction (1,400,000) - (1,400,000) Aurora Heights Drive Reconstruction (500,000) (500,000) Crawford Rose, Valley Cres Reconstruction (500,000) (500,000) Golf Link Reconstruction (500,000) (500,000) Unallocated Other - (844,000) - - (55,400) - - (525,200) - - (22,000) (1,446,600) Total Federal Gas Tax (1,408,900) (2,044,000) (1,400,000) (1,591,200) (1,455,000) (1,400,000) (1,528,000) (1,422,000) (1,500,000) (1,400,000) (1,522,000) (16,671,100) Grants (Region) - Wellington Street Entrance Features (277,100) (277,100) Water R & R Reserve (321,600) - (331,100) (685,000) (648,800) (362,300) - - (868,100) (1,311,300) (344,400) (4,872,600) Waste Water R & R Reserve (228,200) - (10,600) (41,800) (541,300) (162,100) - - (881,800) (42,000) (110,400) (2,018,200) Storm Water R & R Reserve (199,500) (150,000) (362,000) (534,900) (435,300) (401,600) - - (379,200) (1,615,500) (643,400) (4,721,400) NET Roads R & R Reserve (1,045,700) (663,800) (2,661,900) (1,561,400) (97,500) (1,456,300) (1,410,400) 460,100 (1,265,900) (1,789,100) (4,697,700) (16,189,600) (3,481,000) (2,857,800) (4,765,600) (4,414,300) (3,177,900) (3,782,300) (2,938,400) (961,900) (4,895,000) (6,157,900) (7,317,900) (44,750,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R IES Roads Page 25

99 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - WATER SPECIFIC PROJECTS (Approved) Project Total STRUCTURAL WATERMAIN RELINING Project Water Service 733, , , , , ,000 4,233,100 Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL 733, , , , , ,000 4,233,100 BACKFLOW PREVENTION PROGRAM Project Water Service - 100, , ,000 Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL - 100, , ,000 WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Project General 150, , , , , , , , , ,350,000 Wellington E , , ,000 (Ross to Ind Pky N) TOTAL 150, , , , , , , , , ,900,000 BULK METER INSTALLATION 2 ORCHARD HTS Water Service - 180, ,000 PLAZA Sanitary Sewer Project Storm Sewer TOTAL - 180, ,000 TOTAL WATER SPECIFIC PROJECTS Water Service 883, , , , , , , , , ,000 5,963,100 Sanitary Sewer , , ,000 Storm Sewer TOTAL 883, , , ,000 1,350, , , , , ,000 6,513,100 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Water / Wastewater / Stormwater Page 26

100 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - WASTEWATER SPECIFIC PROJECTS (Approved) Project Total PROJECT Project Water Service Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer TOTAL Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Water / Wastewater / Stormwater Page 27

101 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - STORM WATER SPECIFIC PROJECTS (Approved) Project Total SEDIMENT CLEANING Project Water Service (Deerglen & Sanitary Sewer Kennedy) Storm Sewer 50, ,000 TOTAL 50, ,000 SWM IMPROVEMENTS Deer Glen Water Service Project Terrace42047 Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer 200, ,000 TOTAL 200, ,000 LSPP IMPLEMENTATION Water Service Project Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer - 100, , , , , , , , ,600,000 TOTAL - 100, , , , , , , , ,600,000 GENERAL POND CLEANING Water Service Project Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer , , , , , , , , , ,000 TOTAL , , , , , , , , , ,000 TOTAL STORM WATER SPECIFIC PROJECTS Water Service Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer 250, , , , , , , , , , ,000 4,750,000 TOTAL 250, , , , , , , , , , ,000 4,750,000 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Water / Wastewater / Stormwater Page 28

102 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION Project Location / Proj # (approved) Project Total Artificial Turf Repair - soccer goal areas Optimist Park, Fluery, Legion Sheppards Bush Norm Weller, Machell Craddock, Confederation Fields ,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35, ,000 Bandshell/Washroom Roof & Paint Town Park , ,000 Basketball Court Resurfacing Summit Park , ,000 Board Walk Resurface McKenzie Marsh, (nokiidaa Trail 75,000 75,000 Bowling Green Perimeter McMahon Park 15,000 5, ,000 Bridge Replacement Sheppards/Holland Valley , ,000 Case Woodlot retaining wall (trail repair) Case woodlot 25,000-25,000 Fluery Park Washroom upgrade Fluery Park 150, ,000 Fluery Park Gazeebo repair/ replace Fluery Park 35,000 35,000 Fencing - Diamonds 1/2/3 & Soccer L Willson Park - 75, ,000 Field Renovation Norm Weller Park Norm Weller Park 150, , ,000 Field Drainage - Diamonds/Soccer Stewart Burnette Ball Diamond 35,000 35,000 Field Drainage - Diamonds/Soccer L Willson Park , ,000 Greenhouse Expansion/Replacement Parks Yard (incl in new operations centre ) - 90, ,000 James Lloyd Park Shelter replace/repair James Lloyd Park ,000 32,000 Lambert Willson Park Gazebo repair /replace and park shelter Parks Pathway System Player Shelter/Backstop Replacement Playground Replacement: L Willson Park ,000 70,000 Machell / Lloyd BB / Hader (73117) Town/Fleury/Mach/ Confed (73140) 80,000 40, ,000 75, ,000 Khamissa Park - 85, ,000 E Hadar Park , ,000 Wm Kennedy Park , ,000 James Lloyd Park , ,000 Lundy Park , ,000 Wilson Park , ,000 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R PRS Page 29

103 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION - continued Project Location (approved) Playground Replacement (cont'd): Hamilton Park , ,000 Taylor Park , ,000 Harman Park , ,000 Tamarac Park , ,000 L Willson Park , ,000 Copland Park , ,000 Summit Park , ,000 Tom's Park , ,000 Evans Park , ,000 Atkinson Park , ,000 Chapman Park , ,000 Town Park , ,000 Playground Surface Restoration ,000 10,000 10,300 10,600 10,900 11,300 11,600 11,900 20,000 20, ,600 Replace Artificial Turf Sheppards Bush , ,000 St Max , ,000 Replace Shade Structure Hamilton Park - 35, ,000 Splash Pad Surface Upgrade: Ada Johnson Park , ,000 Town Park , ,000 Tennis Court Resurface: N Weller Park , , ,000 Fleury Park , ,000-80,000 Summit Park , ,000-40,000 McMahon Park , , ,000 David English Park , ,000 Trail/Playground Re-design Jack Wood Park , ,000 Walkway Repaving: Lundy Park - 15, ,000 Machell Park , ,000 Copland Park , ,000 Wilson Park , ,000 Summit Park , ,000 Tom's Park , ,000 Atkinson Park , ,000 Walkway/Basketball Repaving: Tamarac Park , ,000 Wm Kennedy Park , ,000 Project Total continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R PRS Page 30

104 Project REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION - continued (approved) Location Project Total Washroom Bldg Renovation Fleury Park - 150, ,000 Parks/Trails Sign Strat & Install. All Parks and Trails per Trails MasterPlan (73134) - 50, ,000 Lions Park Stairs and Trail ,000 25,000 Replacement of Fitness Equipment ,000 40, ,000 Emerald Ash Borer Management Program 40,000 40,000 Street Tree Planting Contract 2C Development Area contribution from developers (73119) - 175, , , , , , , , , ,300 1,135, , , , , ,000 1,207,000 7,228,600 Funding Sources: R & R Infrastructure Reserves (250,000) (817,500) (542,500) (287,800) (780,600) (360,900) (461,300) (404,100) (479,400) (230,000) (807,000) (5,421,100) Cash in Lieu of Parkland Reserve * - (42,500) (112,500) (92,500) (355,000) (155,000) (195,000) (242,500) (172,500) - (400,000) (1,767,500) EAB Reserve (40,000) (40,000) (290,000) (860,000) (655,000) (380,300) (1,135,600) (515,900) (656,300) (646,600) (651,900) (230,000) (1,207,000) (7,228,600) * Half of Playground Equipment and half of Artificial Turf Projects Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R PRS Page 31

105 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - FACILITIES (approved) Project Total Stronach Aurora Recreation Center: Interior Rubber Flooring , ,600 Electrical LED Lighting - Parking Lot 100, ,000 Fire Control Panel , ,700 Equipment Chemical Controllers , ,000 Replace Screw Compressor , ,000 Pool Structure Analysis - 20, ,000 Supp Cooling for Inverter Panels 30, ,000 Modifications to Plumbing Fixtures * 50, ,000 Aurora Recreation Center Total 180,000 20, , , , ,300 Town Hall: Exteriors Exterior Windows , ,300 Mechanical LAN Room HVAC (New System ) , ,000 HVAC 85, ,000 HVAC 85, ,000 HVAC 80, ,000 Electrical Communications & Security Town Hall Total 250, ,300-69, ,300 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Facilities Page 32

106 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - FACILITIES - continued (approved) Project Total Aurora Family Leisure Complex: Electrical LED Lighting Retrofit 50, ,000 Mechanical / Equipment Dasher Board System , ,000 Ice Floor , ,000 Jet ice equipment (RO Unit) 30, ,000 Ice plant retrofit 100, ,000 Fitness Equipment ,000 58,000 42, ,000 60, ,000 Site Works Parking lot repave 350, ,000 Less 2011 Approval (100,000) (100,000) Family Leisure Complex Total 430, ,000 58,000 42, ,000 60,000 1,458,000 Aurora Community Center: Exteriors Roof System (re-roof) , ,000 Retaining Wall & Asphalt 200, ,000 Interiors Sport Flooring , ,600 Auditorium Flooring , ,000 Mechanical Compressors , ,600 HVAC 250, ,000 Condensors , ,900 Chiller , ,000 Site Works Parking Lot Asphalt and Curbing - 375, ,000 ACC 1 Fire Exit 30,000 30,000 Fire Panel and Security Panel - 20, ,000 Aurora Community CenterTotal 630, , , ,000 1,026, ,469,100 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Facilities Page 33

107 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - FACILITIES - continued (approved) Project Total 52 Victoria Street (Child Care Centre) Exterior Roof Coverings , ,200 Interior Floor Finishes , ,600 Mechanical Heat Generating System , ,900 Cooling Generating System , ,800 Site Works Parking Lot - 54, , Victoria St Total - 54, , , Industrial Parkway Foundation & Structural Exterior Exterior Windows , ,200 Roof Structure Exterior Doors Mechanical Roof HVAC System Hydro Building Total , ,200 Factory Theatre Exterior Exterior Windows , ,200 Roof Coverings , ,800 Factory Theatre Total , ,000 Lawn Bowling Tennis Clubhouse Exterior Exterior Windows , ,000 Site Works Parking Lot , ,400 Tennis Clubhouse Total , , ,400 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Facilities Page 34

108 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - FACILITIES - continued (approved) Project Total Office & Garage - 9 Scanlon Electrical Communications & Security Exterior Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Roof Coverings Interior Floor Finishes Ceiling Finishes Mechanical Plumbing Fixtures Heat Generating System Cooling Generating System Office & Garage Total Equipment Depot - 9 Scanlon Electrical Communications & Security Exterior Exterior Windows Roof Coverings Interior Floor Finishes Ceiling Finishes Mechanical Plumbing Fixtures Heat Generating System Cooling Generating System Equipment Depot Total Victoria Hall Exterior Exterior Windows , ,200 Victoria Hall Total , ,200 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Facilities Page 35

109 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - FACILITIES - continued (approved) Project Total Old Fire Hall Exteriors Roll Up Doors Roof Coverings Parking Lot * 150, ,000 Old Fire Hall Total 150, ,000 Church Street School / Museum Exterior Exterior Doors , ,700 School Museum Total , , Victoria St. (Old Library) Exterior Exterior Doors Roof Coverings - 75, ,000 Interior Floor Finishes Mechanical Elevators & Lifts Heat Generating System - 93, ,000 Cooling Generating System - 27, , Victoria St. Total - 195, ,000 Library Yonge Street Interior Carpet Split HVAC System 20, ,000 Sliding Entry Doors - 150, ,000 Library Total 20, , ,000 Seniors Centre - 90 John West Way Interior Multi Purpose Room Floor Refinishing 15, ,000 Senior Centre Total 15, ,000 Future Facilities Maintenance ,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 6,000,000 REPAIR & REPLACEMENT TOTAL 1,675, , , ,600 1,205,300 1,099,400 1,144,200 2,223,200 1,086,700 1,035,000 1,060,000 12,157,900 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Facilities Page 36

110 FLEET NUMBER (APPROVED) REPAIR & REPLACEMENT - FLEET Project Total Kubota/60"ZeroTurn , ,000 Kubota/60"ZeroTurn , ,000 Kubota/60"ZeroTurn , ,000 Kubota/60"ZeroTurn , ,000 Cat/924G Proj , ,000 Olympia/ST , ,000 Ford/F350 Proj , ,000 Ford/F250 Proj , ,000 Ford/F150 Proj , ,000 New Holland , ,000 New Holland , ,000 Dump , ,000 Dump , ,000 Skate Board Park Trailer , ,000 GMC Sierra 13-30, ,000 Ford/F , ,000 Paint Trailer Replacement , ,000 Olympia/ST , ,000 GMC Savana , ,000 GMC Savana , ,000 GMC/Savana , ,000 Eloquip , ,000 Eloquip , ,000 Olympia/ST , ,000 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Fleet Page 37

111 Shown in $ 000's REPAIR & REPLACEMENT - FLEET - continued FLEET NUMBER (APPROVED) Project Total Genie lift , ,000 Frt/FL , ,000 JD/Haul All , ,000 Ford/F , ,000 GMC/K , ,000 Ransome/950D , ,000 Ford F , ,000 Ford F , ,000 SmithcoEasyLiner , ,000 AirWay/6' , ,000 6 ton plow truck Proj , ,000 JD/4x , ,000 Skid Steer Loader , ,000 GMC Sierra Crew Cab , ,000 GMC 1 Ton Dump , ,000 JD/ , ,000 GMC Sierra , ,000 Bartell/SP86/Grinder , ,000 Hoe Pak , ,000 Chev pick up , ,000 Frt/FL , ,000 GMC/ , ,000 Chev/Ccab , ,000 Chev/ , ,000 Kubolta 4x4 Tractor , ,000 continued. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Fleet Page 38

112 Shown in $ 000's REPAIR & REPLACEMENT - FLEET - continued FLEET NUMBER 2, (APPROVED) Project Total JD/ , ,000 Chev/ , ,000 Chev/ , ,000 Chev/ , ,000 Provision for new purchase of , ,000 Provision for new purchase of , ,000 By-law Toyoto Tacoma pick up , ,000 Cat/416B , ,000 Int/ , ,000 Back Hoe 420E IT , ,000 Zamboni , ,000 Catepillar/420E , ,000 JD/5225 Tractor , ,000 Woodchipper , ,000 Chev Express , ,000 Chev Express , ,000 JD/4320 Tractor , ,000 JD/ , ,000 Chev Silverado , ,000 Chev Silverado , ,000 Chev Silverado , ,000 Chev Silverado , ,000 Chev Silverado , ,000 FUTURE Unidentified Allowance , , ,000 1,500,000 Total Fleet R & R COSTS 545, , , , , , ,000 1,024, , , ,000 5,998,000 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 R+R Fleet Page 39

113 GROWTH & NEW ASSETS ( Anticipated Spend of $86,495,100 over 11 years ) Specific Growth & New Assets are at the following pages: GROWTH & NEW SUMMARY Page 41 Office of the C.A.O. Page 42 Customer & Legislative Services Page 43 Corporate & Financial Services Page 44 Building & By-law Services Page 45 Fire & Emergency Services Page 46 Infrastructure & Environmental Services Page 47 Parks & Recreation Services Page 48 Facilities & Fleet Page 50 Planning and Development Page 51 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Page 40

114 GROWTH AND NEW ASSETS INVESTMENT PLAN - SUMMARY OF CAPITAL NEEDS GROWTH and NEW 10 YEAR OUTLOOK (Approved) Administrative Officer 220, Customer & Legislative 130, , ,000 Financial Services & I.T. - 35, ,000 60,000-10, ,000 Building & Bylaw Services 200, , , , ,000 Fire Services - 1,747,000 3,957, , ,804,000 Infrastructure & Environment 4,797, , , ,600 2,221,000 2,592,000 30, , ,384,400 P & R Services 1,500, ,000 3,050,000 3,800,000 3,030,000 1,300,000 1,680, , , ,000 3,150,000 18,271,000 Facilities 13,436,500 3,815,500 8,400,000 12,940, ,000 1,500, ,505,500 Fleet 80, ,000 40,000 65, , ,000 70, , , , ,000 1,255,000 Planning & Development - 10, ,000 TOTAL GROWTH & NEW 20,365,200 7,294,300 15,802,000 17,627,600 6,246,000 5,552,000 1,780,000 1,328, , ,000 3,300,000 60,379,900 Water/Sewer Projects ,000 2,000,000 3,500, ,750,000 TOTAL GROWTH & NEW 20,365,200 7,294,300 15,802,000 17,627,600 6,246,000 5,802,000 3,780,000 4,828, , ,000 3,300,000 66,129,900 Total including ,495,100 Funding Sources: Development Charges (8,913,100) (2,547,400) (10,523,100) (15,423,000) (5,544,900) (5,012,800) (3,260,000) (4,686,200) (810,000) (495,000) (2,970,000) (51,272,400) Federal Gax Tax (537,900) Special Purposes Reserves (1,015,100) (232,100) (220,000) (360,000) (304,000) (460,000) (295,000) (75,000) (75,000) (30,000) (305,000) (2,356,100) Growth & New Reserves (675,200) (1,358,600) (2,644,900) (1,783,600) (397,100) (329,200) (218,000) (66,800) (15,000) (25,000) (25,000) (6,863,200) R & R Reserves Development / Sale of Land (8,030,900) (1,969,100) (1,969,100) Water & Sewer Reserves (915,900) (224,100) (7,000) (231,100) Internal Borrowing External Funding (277,100) (963,000) (2,414,000) (61,000) (3,438,000) (20,365,200) (7,294,300) (15,802,000) (17,627,600) (6,246,000) (5,802,000) (3,780,000) (4,828,000) (900,000) (550,000) (3,300,000) (66,129,900) Total including 2013 (86,495,100) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N Summary Page 41

115 GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - OFFICE OF THE C.A.O (approved) Project Total Growth & New Customer Relationship Mgmt 100, , Photo-Voltaic System - T. Hall 60, , Photo-Voltaic System - Library 60, , , ,000 Funding Sources: Development Charges R & R Engineering Building Res Storm Sewer R & R Water & Sewer R & R Facilities R & R Internal borrowing - - Growth & New (100,000) (100,000) Council Discretionary Reserve (120,000) (120,000) Sales of Municipal Land (220,000) (220,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N CAO Page 42

116 GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - CUSTOMER & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES Growth & New (approved) Records/Information Mgmt 100, , , Meeting Mgmt Software 30, ,000 Project Total 130, , ,000 Funding Sources: Development Charges Growth & New Reserve (130,000) (250,000) (380,000) (130,000) (250,000) (250,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N CLS Page 43

117 GROWTH & NEW PROJECTS - CORPORATE & FINANCIAL SERVICES Project Total (approved) Growth & New Joint Ops LAN room & DR site - 35, ,000 60,000-10, , , ,000 60,000-10, ,000 Funding Sources: Growth & New Reserve - (35,000) - - (45,000) (60,000) - (10,000) (150,000) - (35,000) - - (45,000) (60,000) - (10,000) (150,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N CFS Page 44

118 GROWTH & NEW PROJECTS - BUILDING & BY-LAW SERVICES Project Total Growth & New Customer Care Centre 200, , , , , Online Services - 150, , , , , , , Funding Sources: Development Charges Building Reserve Online Services - (75,000) (75,000) Growth & New - - Customer Care Centre (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (800,000) Online Services - (75,000) (75,000) (200,000) (350,000) (200,000) (200,000) (950,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N BBS Page 45

119 GROWTH & NEW PROJECTS - FIRE SERVICES Project Total Growth & New New Fire Training Facility - 1,282, ,282, Pumper for New Fire Stations - 465, , New Fire Station (FOR 2016) - - 3,957, ,957, Turn Out Gear for New Crews , ,000-1,747,000 3,957, , ,804,000 Funding Sources: Development Charges - (784,000) (1,543,000) (39,000) (2,366,000) Contribution from Newmarket - (963,000) (2,414,000) (61,000) (3,438,000) - (1,747,000) (3,957,000) (100,000) (5,804,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N Fire and Emergency Page 46

120 GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - I.E.S. / ROADS / SIDEWALKS / SANITARY SEWER Project Total Growth & New Projects: Recon & Upgrade - Vandorf Sideroad 2,253, ,253, Wellington St Entrance Features 879, , Pedestrian Signals on John West Way 89, , Wellington St Light adds. - Mary to Industrial 366, , Speed Message Board 16, , S/W - Leslie St - Wellington to 300m south , ,600 S/W - Inc Capacity - Wellington St E Entrance 879, ,300 S/W - St John's - Bayview To E Town limit ,703, ,703,000 S/W - Bayview - Bloomington to Vandorf ,155, ,155,000 S/W - Bayview Ave - Vandorf to Stone Rd , , ,000 S/W - Bayview Ave - Stone Rd to Wellington - 70, ,000 S/W - Bayview Ave - Hartwell to St John's - 125, ,000 S/W - Bayview Ave - St John's to N Town limit , ,000 S/W - Ind Pkwy N - E. Side, AFLC to St John's , , , S/W - Ind Pkwy S - E. Side, Wellington to Vandorf 314, , ,000 S/W - Mary - Ind. Pkwy S. to Wellington , , ,000 S/W - Yonge - Batson Dr to 185 m North ,000 74, ,000 S/W - Yonge - 185m N of Batson to St John's , , ,000 S/W - E side Yonge - St John's to N Town Limit , , ,000 S/W - W side Yonge - St John's to N Town Limit , , ,000 S/W - Yonge - S of Henderson to Ind Pkwy S , , ,000 Yonge St Sanitary Sewer Replaceent ,000 2,000,000 3,500, ,750,000 4,797, , , ,600 2,221,000 2,842,000 2,030,000 3,918, ,932,200 Funding Sources: Development Charges - Roads (3,788,600) (401,200) (139,500) (470,300) (1,998,900) (2,332,800) (27,000) (376,200) (9,534,500) Development Charges - Sanitary Sewer (250,000) (2,000,000) (3,500,000) (5,750,000) External Funding (277,100) (277,100) Federal Gas Tax (537,900) (537,900) Growth and New Reserve (194,200) (44,600) (15,500) (52,300) (222,100) (259,200) (3,000) (41,800) (832,700) (4,797,800) (445,800) (155,000) (522,600) (2,221,000) (2,842,000) (2,030,000) (3,918,000) (16,932,200) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G + N IES Page 47

121 Growth & New Projects: GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION SERVICES Forecast Excludes Purchases of Parklands (approved) Project Total Arboretum Development 50, , , , , Pedestrian Underpasses (three locations on Leslie street and two locations on St Johns sd rd Grade Separated crossing Wellington St east of John West Way Grade Separated crossing Vandorf Road at Archerhill Grade Separated crossing Bayview Avenue at Stone Rd and Benville Drive in conjunction with regional rd widening project 300,000 ea Grade Separated Crossing Yonge street at Elderberry , , ,500, ,500, ,500, , , , , ,500,000 1,500, Mark St to McMahon Pk Pathway 88, , WAMS Mobile Devices 85, , Trail Construction (Trail Master Plan in 2C development area based on $100 per lin. Meter 3 phases 5000 lin meter) Trail Construction (Trail Master Plan in Coutts /Pandolfo development area based on $100 per lin. Meter 2 phases 100 lin meter ea.phase) , , , ,500, , , , Seniors Bocce Court 47, , Multi Use Courts per Master Plan - 130, , Skate Board Park 800, , Basketball Court , , Computerized Irrigation System - 20, , GPS Tracking System - 15, , Rail Crossings at grade McRoberts , , Rail Crossing at grade Vata Court , , Rail Crossings at Grade cousins dr , , ORC Land - Soccer Field 405, , Pathway Lighting - Lambert - 48, ,000 continued.. Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N PRS Page 48

122 GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION SERVICES Forecast Excludes Purchases of Parklands (approved) Project Total Path Lighting Install (L.Wilson/Optimist Pk) - 48, , Additional Playgrounds , , , ,050, Splash Pads (2C) , , , Wildlife Park (Phase I, II & III) - - 1,500,000 1,000, , ,000, Hard Ball Diamond ,200, ,200, BMX Park , , Beach Volleyball Court , , Pond Water Feature , , Mountain Bike Course , , Wellington Street Planting 25, , Soccer Field Lighting (Machell Pk) , , Sand Based Field (Harmon Park) , , Rail Crossings - Grade Separated Loraview lane,. St Johns sd rd, Walton Drive &Milgate Place , , , ,000 3,000, Outdoor Rink with boards and refridgeration , ,000 1,500, ,000 3,150,000 3,800,000 3,030,000 1,300,000 1,680, , , ,000 3,150,000 19,871,900 Funding Sources: Development Charges - Parks Dev (821,700) (117,000) (2,745,000) (3,330,000) (2,691,000) (990,000) (1,170,000) (675,000) (675,000) (360,000) (2,835,000) (16,409,700) Cash in Lieu - Parkland (654,200) (98,000) (220,000) (360,000) (304,000) (310,000) (295,000) (75,000) (75,000) (30,000) (305,000) (2,726,200) Parks Master Plan Landscape Fee Reserve Growth & New Reserve (25,000) (146,000) (185,000) (110,000) (35,000) - (215,000) - - (10,000) (10,000) (736,000) Region of York (1,500,900) (361,000) (3,150,000) (3,800,000) (3,030,000) (1,300,000) (1,680,000) (750,000) (750,000) (400,000) (3,150,000) (19,871,900) Aurora 10 Year 150 Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N PRS Page 49

123 Growth and New: Facilities: (approved) Joint Operations Centre 13,236,500 3,245, ,482, New Waterworks Storage - 70, , Town Hall Parking Lot Expansion 200, , New Recreation Facility - - 2,400,000 12,000, , ,250, New Library - 500,000 6,000, , ,440, Artificial Ice Rink ,500, ,500, Dedicated Youth Space Fleet: GROWTH AND NEW PROJECTS - FACILITIES & FLEET Total Facilities 13,436,500 3,815,500 8,400,000 12,940, ,000 1,500, ,942, Additions to the Town Fleet , , , , , ,000 Light Duty Pick-Up Water 20, ,000 Lt Duty Pick-Up Fleet Mechanics Lt Duty Pick-ups Tech Assistants Additional Roads Pick-Up 30, ,000 Additional Roads Pick-Up 30, ,000 2 ton Flat Bed Salt, Sander Plow - 80, ,000 Compact Sweeper/Wacker - 150, ,000 3/4 Ton Pick-Up - Parks - 50, ,000 Mini Excavator - Parks , ,000 Skid Steer and Tracks - Parks , ,000 Truck and Float - Parks , ,000 Water Truck , ,000 Total Fleet 80, ,000 40,000 65, , ,000 70, , , , ,000 1,335,000 Project Total Total Facilities and Fleet 13,516,500 4,095,500 8,440,000 13,005, ,000 1,600,000 70, , , , ,000 42,277,000 Funding Sources: Development Charges (4,302,800) (1,245,200) (6,185,600) (11,583,700) (855,000) (1,440,000) (63,000) (135,000) (135,000) (135,000) (135,000) (26,215,300) Special Purposes (240,900) (59,100) (150,000) (450,000) Water & Sewer Reserves (915,900) (224,100) (7,000) (1,147,000) Parks Master Plan Land Sales Proceeds (8,030,900) (1,969,100) (10,000,000) Repair & Replacement Reserve Growth & New Reserve (26,000) (598,000) (2,254,400) (1,421,300) (95,000) (10,000) - (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (15,000) (4,464,700) (13,516,500) (4,095,500) (8,440,000) (13,005,000) (950,000) (1,600,000) (70,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (42,277,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N Facilities / Fleet Page 50

124 GROWTH & NEW PROJECTS - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Project Total Growth & New Second GIS Plotter - 10, ,000 Funding Sources: , , Growth & New Second GIS Plotter - (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 G+N Planning Page 51

125 STUDIES & OTHER ASSETS ( Anticipated Spend of $3,901,000 over 11 years ) Specific Studies & Other Assets are at the following pages: STUDIES & OTHER SUMMARY Page 53 Office of the C.A.O. Page 54 Corporate & Financial Services Page 55 Planning & Development Page 56 Infrastructure & Environmental Services Page 57 Parks & Recreation Services Page 58 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Page 52

126 STUDIES AND OTHER PROJECTS INVESTMENT PLAN - SUMMARY OF CAPITAL NEEDS 10 YEAR OUTLOOK (Approved) STUDIES and OTHER Chief Administrative Officer , , ,000 Financial Services 45, , ,000-80, ,000 Building / Bylaw Planning - 200, , , , , , , ,700,000 Infrastructure & Environment - 100, , , , , , , ,000 1,440,000 Parks & Recreation 190,000 60, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,000 3,666,000 Total including ,901,000 Funding Sources: Studies & Other Reserve (74,500) (40,500) - (62,000) (70,000) (309,500) - (28,000) (32,000) (70,000) (250,000) (862,000) Development Charges (40,500) (294,500) - (270,000) (200,000) (357,500) (200,000) (452,000) (200,000) - - (1,974,000) Special Purposes Reserves (60,000) (30,000) (30,000) Infrastructure Sustainability (Tax) Water/Sewer/Storm Res - (100,000) (100,000) - (200,000) - (100,000) (100,000) - (200,000) - (800,000) External Grants (60,000) (235,000) (465,000) (100,000) (332,000) (470,000) (667,000) (300,000) (580,000) (232,000) (270,000) (250,000) (3,666,000) Total including 2013 (3,901,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S + O Summary Page 53

127 STUDIES AND OTHER PROJECTS - CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Project Total (approved) Studies & Other Economic Development Town of Aurora Strategic Plan , , , , , ,000 Funding Sources: Studies & Other (32,000) (32,000) - - (64,000) (32,000) (32,000) - - (64,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S+O CAO Page 54

128 Project Total (approved) Studies & Other DC Background Study 45, , ,000 Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery Study 25,000 25,000 IT Strategic Plan - 80, , ,000 Funding Sources: STUDIES AND OTHER PROJECTS - CORPORATE & FINANCIAL SERVICES 45, , ,000-80, ,000 Development Charges (40,500) (94,500) (157,500) - (72,000) (364,500) Studies & Other (4,500) (10,500) (17,500) - (8,000) (40,500) (45,000) (105,000) (175,000) - (80,000) (405,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S+O CFS Page 55

129 STUDIES & OTHER PROJECTS - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Studies & Other (approved) Community Improvement Plan Official Plan Review , , , Growth Related Studies - 200, , , , , , ,200,000 Project Total - 200, , , , , , , ,700,000 Funding Sources: Development Charges - (200,000) - (270,000) (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (380,000) (200,000) - - (1,650,000) Special Purposes Reserves Studies & Other (30,000) (20,000) (50,000) - (200,000) - (300,000) (200,000) (200,000) (200,000) (400,000) (200,000) - - (1,700,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S+O Planning Page 56

130 STUDIES & OTHER PROJECTS - INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Studies and Other (approved) Salt Management Plan , , , Assess Retaining Walls Condition - 20, ,000-40, Update Master Transportation Study , , ,000 Green Facilities Operating Policies , , ,000 Green Fleet Operating Policies , , , Water Hydraulic Model - 100, , , Wastewater Hydraulic Model , , ,000 Water System Leak Detection Study , , ,000 Project Total - 100, , , , , , , ,000 1,440,000 Funding Sources: Infrastructure Sustainability - Water - (100,000) - - (200,000) - (100,000) - - (200,000) - (600,000) Infrastructure Sustainability - Wastewater - - (100,000) (100,000) (200,000) Studies & Other (70,000) (250,000) (70,000) (250,000) (640,000) - (100,000) (100,000) - (270,000) (250,000) (100,000) (100,000) - (270,000) (250,000) (1,440,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S+O IES Page 57

131 STUDIES & OTHER (approved) PRS Physical Activity Plan Parks Maintenance Standards , , Update Tree Inventory - 30, , Urban Forest Study 120, , Cultural master Plan 70,000 30, ,000 Funding Sources: STUDIES & OTHER PROJECTS - PARKS & RECREATION SERVICES Project Total 190,000 60, , ,000 Cash in Lieu of Parkland (60,000) (30,000) (90,000) Parks Master Plan External Grants (60,000) - (60,000) Studies and Other (70,000) (30,000) (42,000) (142,000) (190,000) (60,000) (42,000) (292,000) Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 S+O PRS Page 58

132 FUNDING SOURCES / RESERVE BALANCES / CASH FLOWS SOURCES OF CAPITAL PLAN FUNDING: - Consolidated Page 60 - Repair & Replacement Page 61 - Growth & New Page 62 - Studies & Other Page YEAR RESERVE FORECASTS & CASH FLOW: - Repair & Replacement, TAX Funded Pages 64 to 70 - Repair & Replacement, RATES Funded Page 71 - Growth & New Page 72 - Studies & Other Page YEAR DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BALANCES & CASH FLOW: - D.C. Capital Funding Detail Page 74 - D.C. Overall Funding Summary Page 77 - Consolidated D.C. Reserves & Cash Flow Pages 78 - D.C. Reserves & Cash Flow by Category Pages 79 to 87 Aurora 10 Year Capital Plan - June, 2013 Page 59