SFY13 2014 (#): (0631) 09/30/2014 2014-1 2 3 4 SFY14



Similar documents
Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Quarter 1

Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Engagement

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Page 1

% of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 30 Days SFY11 Level Target

2012 (#): (0121) SFY

Crosswalk Management System

The NJSAMS Report. Heroin Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment in New Jersey. In Brief. New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System.

Colorado Substance Abuse Treatment Clients with Co-Occurring Disorders, FY05

Crosswalk Management System

Client Population Statistics

As the proportion of racial/

AN ASSESSMENT OF PUBLICLY FUNDED ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA Melinda M. Hohman. John D. Clapp

Pregnant Women Entering Substance Abuse Treatment for the First Time: 10 Year Trends

12 & 12, INC. FY 15 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT

JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM

Kathryn P. Jett Director

MAIL: Recovery Center Missoula FAX: Wyoming St. OR ATTN: Admissions Missoula, MT ATTN: Admissions

CHAPTER 3: Patient Admissions to Treatment for Abuse of Alcohol and Drugs in Appalachia,

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

Addiction Severity Index Fifth Edition

Treatment completion is an

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Cape May County

Trends in Adult Female Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Reporting Primary Alcohol Abuse: 1992 to Alcohol abuse affects millions of

Recovery Services of Northwest Ohio, Inc.

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions for Abuse of Benzodiazepines

CCC Hooper Detoxification Stabilization Center. Accessing Services

2f: Specialist Treatment Centres: Durban/Pietermaritzburg (PMB)

Substance Abuse Overview 2013

Substance Abuse Treatment Statistics Barnstable County Residents Focus on 2007 to July 25, 2013

Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

Application for Free Home Repairs

Drug Use, Testing, and Treatment in Jails By Doris James Wilson BJS Statistician

Kentucky Needs Assessment Project Brief Report. IV Drug Use among Kentucky Adults

SASKATCHEWAN NNADAP TREATMENT SERVICES APPLICATION FORM Revised June, 2009 VAN LOONVCONSULTING

MONROE COUNTY OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY CONNECTION PROJECT PROGRAM EVALUATION DECEMBER 2010

Thirty-First Judicial District DUI / Drug Court EVALUATION

CASE MANAGEMENT INVENTORY OF SUPPORT SERVICES For Adults

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Statewide

Substance Abuse Treatment Needs, Capacity and Costs

HowHow to Identify the Best Stock Broker For You

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2010 Passaic County

Sacramento County 2010

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Hunterdon County

Evaluation of Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes

San Diego County 2010

Substance Use, Treatment Need and Receipt of Treatment in Minnesota:

An integrated approach to addressing opiate abuse in Maine. Debra L. Brucker, MPA, PhD State of Maine Office of Substance Abuse October 2009

Substance Abuse Overview 2012 Middlesex County

Survey of Structure and Operations (TCU SSO)

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Alcohol and Drug Treatment Penetration

alcohol and drug Treatment Services Report Hawai i,

Special Treatment/Recovery Programs -- Participant Demographics

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Morris County

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Camden County

Special Report Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Involving Abuse of Pain Relievers: 1998 and 2008

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Centers

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Patient Satisfaction Survey Results

NC ADATC Service. NC Coalition for MH/DD/SAS By Division of State Operated Healthcare Facilities February, 2015 DSOHF ADATC 2.

Revised April 1, 2015 Page 1 of 5

Residential SOAP and Inpatient Dual Diagnosis Comparisons Consumer Satisfaction Report, Addendum to Inpatient Aggregate Report

PRISM SECTION 1 OVERVIEW. Number of times divorced. Number of times widowed

Age # % State Avg % 16% % 24% % 19% % 23% % 14% % 4% Ethnicity # % State Avg

CHAPTER 6: Substance Abuse and Mental Health A Comparison of Appalachian Coal Mining Areas to Other Areas within the Appalachian Region

a lc ohol a n d dru g Treatment Services Hawai i, 5-Year Trends ( )

Division of Behavioral Health Services

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER (SUD) SERVICES

Please answer all questions which apply to you and mark those that do not apply with N/A. LAST NAME FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME

FY 2012 Block Grant Reporting Section

How To Identify A Substance Abuse/Addiction Counselor

WITS (Web Infrastructure for Treatment Services).

UTAH DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES MONITORING CHECKLIST (FY 2014) GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

ACCOUNTABILITY COURT DATA. Ren Yang Hafner, Operations Analyst Statistical Analysis Center Criminal Justice Coordinating Council

Quarterly Form (SAP Online), Page 1

Evaluation at the Recovery Centers Last Updated July 10, 2013

Alcoholism and Substance Abuse

Child & Adolescent Quality Access and Policy Committee Residential Treatment Centers Friday June 20, 2014

Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs

TEEN CHALLENGE CENTER--PENSACOLA, FLORIDA STUDENT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM ENTRY. Personal Data and Information. In Case of Emergency Please Contact

Santa Fe Recovery Center Follow Up Survey Form

YOUNG ADULTS IN DUAL DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT: COMPARISON TO OLDER ADULTS AT INTAKE AND POST-TREATMENT

Special Report. Parents in Prison and Their Minor Children. Bureau of Justice Statistics

Dodge-Fillmore- Olmsted Methamphetamine Treatment Project. July 2006-December 2007 evaluation report

Drug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota

Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study for DWI Offenders

Treatment and Rehabilitation

Presentation to the Boston HIV Planning Council. Lydie Ultimo, MSW Director Bureau of Substance Abuse Services

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Statewide Evaluation of 2003 Iowa Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts

Idaho Peer Support Specialist Training Application

The Nation s Number One Health Problem The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

COLLEGIATE RECOVERY COMMUNITY Application for the OSU CRC and Recovery House

o Please include me on the ACCBO List

March Senior Executive Service Report

APPLICATION FOR Page 1/7 RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice Substance Use Disorder Form Instructions

Transcription:

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Detoxification - Engagement % (#) of Detox Clients/Length of Stay At Least Two Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 91.0% 10,238 80.9% 2,500 78.0% 2,206 81.5% 2,353 82.3% 2,385 80.7% 9,444 Region IV 93.4% 971 69.4% 127 64.3% 133 71.5% 148 74.5% 149 69.9% 557 Provider 92.5% 296 59.3% 73 57.4% 85 61.7% 92 65.2% 92 61.0% 342 Detoxification - Retention % of Discharged Detox Clients/Completed Services % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 76.2% 8,460 65.9% 1,882 68.0% 1,735 65.9% 1,786 63.4% 1,682 65.8% 7,085 Region IV 76.1% 787 57.8% 104 57.8% 115 50.8% 101 49.5% 90 53.9% 410 Provider 77.5% 248 58.2% 71 54.8% 80 55.2% 79 52.3% 67 55.1% 297 Detoxification - Continuity of Care % of Detox Clients/Linked to Treatment % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 52.0% 4,551 55.0% 1,374 54.5% 1,096 49.5% 952 42.7% 807 50.8% 4,229 Region IV 57.1% 457 70.0% 84 70.9% 83 62.6% 72 48.8% 61 62.9% 300 Provider 73.2% 183 79.5% 58 78.7% 59 78.6% 55 55.4% 41 72.9% 213 Page 1

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Engagement % Admitted Level I Clients/At Least 4 Sessions/First 30 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 47.8% 15,004 46.9% 3,618 42.4% 3,072 48.2% 3,773 45.7% 3,400 45.9% 13,863 Region IV 50.2% 881 46.2% 288 41.9% 262 43.6% 309 42.6% 279 43.6% 1,138 Provider 80.2% 353 71.1% 96 69.7% 106 70.8% 119 72.9% 113 71.1% 434 Level I - Retention % of Discharged Level I Clients/Completed Treatment (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 51.9% 12,328 52.3% 3,381 51.4% 2,998 50.7% 2,938 49.9% 2,211 51.2% 11,528 Region IV 38.7% 446 41.9% 205 41.0% 189 36.4% 169 43.2% 147 40.5% 710 Provider 40.1% 134 35.4% 46 38.7% 55 32.8% 45 26.7% 24 34.1% 170 Level I - Retention % of Clients/At Least 10 Sessions After First 30 Days (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 25.2% 7,904 27.1% 2,089 27.2% 1,971 24.0% 1,876 17.3% 1,284 23.9% 7,220 Region IV 35.0% 614 35.0% 218 34.7% 217 28.1% 199 21.2% 139 29.6% 773 Provider 53.0% 233 48.9% 66 50.0% 76 45.2% 76 43.9% 68 46.9% 286 Level I - Retention % of Admitted Level I Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 52.7% 16,560 56.3% 4,343 53.9% 3,902 51.4% 4,022 42.2% 3,142 51.0% 15,409 Region IV 47.1% 826 51.2% 319 48.3% 302 41.1% 291 38.6% 253 44.6% 1,165 Provider 60.5% 266 58.5% 79 57.9% 88 51.2% 86 50.3% 78 54.3% 331 Page 2

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/12-Step Group Participation (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 37.1% 8,437 38.3% 2,392 36.1% 1,999 36.6% 1,966 38.3% 1,597 37.3% 7,954 Region IV 32.0% 328 30.9% 142 28.2% 118 28.7% 117 30.4% 92 29.5% 469 Provider 71.9% 194 65.0% 65 63.2% 67 35.1% 59 60.5% 46 62.5% 237 Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/Supportive Interaction (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 74.9% 16,987 75.8% 4,741 76.3% 4,242 75.7% 4,129 77.3% 3,237 76.2% 16,349 Region IV 62.7% 626 71.8% 323 74.4% 308 74.4% 302 79.4% 235 74.6% 1,168 Provider 59.2% 168 62.1% 64 81.6% 84 75.5% 74 82.2% 60 74.8% 282 Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 77.7% 17,676 78.5% 4,930 78.4% 4,381 77.9% 4,252 79.8% 3,355 78.6% 16,918 Region IV 71.0% 699 75.8% 344 76.9% 319 76.7% 309 80.8% 240 77.2% 1,212 Provider 82.5% 227 78.4% 80 86.7% 91 83.3% 80 89.3% 67 84.1% 318 Page 3

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level II - Engagement % Admitted Clients/At Least 12 Sessions/First 30 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 36.4% 4,706 35.6% 1,266 31.9% 1,059 36.5% 1,213 34.5% 1,153 34.6% 4,691 Region IV 47.2% 159 40.4% 46 32.0% 31 36.9% 38 43.9% 50 38.6% 165 Provider 64.7% 55 43.8% 14 45.5% 15 36.0% 9 48.6% 17 44.0% 55 Level II - Retention % Admitted Clients/At Least 18 Sessions/First 60 Days (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 40.2% 5,195 38.0% 1,351 35.7% 1,186 40.1% 1,331 36.6% 1,223 37.6% 5,091 Region IV 46.9% 158 43.9% 50 34.0% 33 43.7% 45 43.0% 49 41.4% 177 Provider 63.5% 54 43.8% 14 39.4% 13 48.0% 12 45.7% 16 44.0% 55 Level II - Retention % of Discharged Level II Clients/Completed Treatment (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 42.4% 4,207 45.1% 1,330 46.1% 1,227 45.8% 1,121 38.3% 778 44.2% 4,456 Region IV 27.0% 58 43.4% 43 43.5% 40 48.8% 39 47.4% 36 45.5% 158 Provider 18.0% 11 27.6% 8 33.3% 11 10.0% 2 13.0% 3 22.9% 24 Level II - Retention % of Admitted Level II Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 53.7% 6,949 55.1% 1,958 53.4% 1,774 54.7% 1,817 47.6% 1,591 52.7% 7,140 Region IV 55.2% 186 58.8% 67 58.8% 57 57.3% 59 59.6% 68 58.6% 251 Provider 67.1% 57 53.1% 17 60.6% 20 52.0% 13 51.4% 18 54.4% 68 Illinois Department of Human Services, Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Page 4

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level II - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/12-Step Group Participation (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 55.0% 5,682 51.8% 1,590 53.3% 1,431 54.2% 1,406 53.4% 1,219 53.1% 5,646 Region IV 49.7% 149 66.0% 66 57.5% 50 67.1% 55 64.9% 48 63.8% 219 Provider 80.8% 63 73.1% 19 67.9% 19 88.9% 16 81.0% 17 76.3% 71 Level II - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/Supportive Interaction (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 76.9% 7,817 77.4% 2,320 80.1% 2,142 80.0% 2,066 80.9% 1,850 79.5% 8,378 Region IV 72.2% 192 87.8% 86 91.9% 79 95.0% 76 91.9% 68 91.4% 309 Provider 77.0% 57 92.3% 24 73.1% 19 94.1% 16 85.7% 18 85.6% 77 Level II - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 82.1% 8,448 81.0% 2,470 82.9% 2,232 83.2% 2,167 83.9% 1,920 82.6% 8,789 Region IV 80.8% 215 90.9% 90 93.0% 80 97.5% 78 94.5% 69 93.8% 317 Provider 91.8% 67 92.6% 25 84.6% 22 100.0% 17 90.5% 19 91.2% 83 Page 5

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level III.5 - Engagement % of Level III.5 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 7 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 86.4% 10,624 88.3% 2,901 88.6% 2,787 87.0% 2,736 86.8% 2,753 87.7% 11,177 Region IV 87.2% 566 93.5% 200 92.0% 206 85.9% 207 87.5% 210 89.6% 823 Provider 88.8% 238 88.9% 64 91.5% 75 82.5% 80 90.5% 76 88.1% 295 Level III.5 - Retention % of Level III.5 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 14 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 75.3% 9,252 75.9% 2,495 76.8% 2,415 74.2% 2,334 74.8% 2,374 75.4% 9,618 Region IV 75.8% 492 81.8% 175 83.5% 187 74.7% 180 75.0% 180 78.6% 722 Provider 80.6% 216 77.4% 56 80.5% 66 75.3% 73 78.6% 66 77.9% 261 Level III.5 - Continuity of Care % of Clients/Linked to Lower Level of Care % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 36.0% 4,109 47.5% 1,600 46.1% 1,340 41.4% 1,141 23.0% 618 40.1% 4,699 Region IV 46.7% 272 53.6% 111 52.2% 107 49.8% 100 20.7% 39 44.6% 357 Provider 52.9% 120 67.1% 47 72.2% 52 63.2% 48 29.3% 17 59.4% 164 Page 6

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level III.1 - Engagement SFY13 Level Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY14 Cumulative % of Level III.1 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 7 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 89.3% 1,175 83.3% 320 83.9% 261 86.2% 256 92.4% 257 86.1% 1,094 Region IV 100.0% 8 92.3% 12 88.9% 8 77.8% 7 66.7% 2 85.3% 29 Provider N.A. N.A. 100.0% 8 100.0% 4 100.0% 6 100.0% 2 100.0% 20 Level III.1 - Retention SFY13 Level Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY14 Cumulative % of Level III.1 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 14 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 77.4% 1,019 75.0% 288 76.2% 237 78.5% 233 84.5% 235 78.2% 993 Region IV 100.0% 8 76.9% 10 88.9% 8 77.8% 7 66.7% 2 79.4% 27 Provider N.A. N.A. 75.0% 6 100.0% 4 100.0% 6 100.0% 2 90.0% 18 Level III.1 - Continuity of Care SFY13 Level Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY14 Cumulative % of Discharged Clients/Completed Tx/+ NOMS Status % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 42.1% 481 39.3% 126 40.8% 102 34.1% 79 29.5% 52 36.7% 359 Region IV 83.3% 5 45.5% 5 42.9% 3 44.4% 4 33.3% 1 43.3% 13 Provider N.A. N.A. 57.1% 4 50.0% 2 80.0% 4 100.0% 2 66.7% 12 Page 7

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Recovery Home - Engagement % of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 7 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 72.9% 1,243 80.9% 504 84.7% 520 88.5% 548 86.8% 553 85.2% 2,125 Region IV 8.6% 24 80.0% 16 85.7% 12 95.2% 20 96.0% 24 90.0% 72 Provider N.A. N.A. 100.0% 3 100.0% 10 88.9% 8 100.0% 7 96.6% 28 Recovery Home - Retention % of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 30 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 43.8% 747 48.0% 299 51.3% 315 60.6% 375 60.1% 383 55.0% 1,372 Region IV 0.7% 2 55.0% 11 57.1% 8 61.9% 13 64.0% 16 60.0% 48 Provider N.A. N.A. 100.0% 3 90.0% 9 88.9% 8 42.9% 3 79.3% 23 Recovery Home - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/Completed Services/+ NOMS Status % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 72.5% 964 68.4% 363 72.6% 349 67.9% 337 64.8% 274 68.5% 1,323 Region IV 74.7% 192 76.5% 13 38.5% 5 50.0% 8 31.6% 6 49.2% 32 Provider N.A. N.A. 33.3% 1 40.0% 4 50.0% 3 0.0% 0 34.8% 8 *Performance measure levels for a particular quarter are based on service billings accepted in DARTS as of the date of the report for clients opened during that quarter. Page 8

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Employment Status - Clients Employed (Full-time or Part-time) at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. (Excludes Clients not in Labor Force) Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 120 169 491 590 5,454 6,563 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 301 301 1,117 1,117 14,495 14,495 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 39.9% 56.1% 44.0% 52.8% 37.6% 45.3% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 21 28 63 83 1,897 2,374 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 59 59 211 211 6,480 6,480 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 35.6% 47.5% 29.9% 39.3% 29.3% 36.6% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 30 25 70 67 726 622 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 142 142 357 357 5,072 5,072 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 21.1% 17.6% 19.6% 18.8% 14.3% 12.3% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 7 8 5 8 73 398 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 13 13 21 21 718 718 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 53.8% 61.5% 23.8% 38.1% 10.2% 55.4% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 10 10 9 10 211 433 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 18 18 24 24 1,425 1,425 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 55.6% 55.6% 37.5% 41.7% 14.8% 30.4% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for employment status or who are reported to not be in the labor force at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 9

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Housing Status - Clients with Stable Housing (Independent Provider Region IV Statewide Living) at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 190 185 753 756 8,466 8,727 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 453 453 1,663 1,663 21,679 21,679 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 41.9% 40.8% 45.3% 45.5% 39.1% 40.3% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 27 30 133 140 3,329 3,375 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 91 91 325 325 9,739 9,739 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 29.7% 33.0% 40.9% 43.1% 34.2% 34.7% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 13 50 217 189 2,844 2,630 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 308 308 903 903 12,305 12,305 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 4.2% 16.2% 24.0% 20.9% 23.1% 21.4% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 2 3 2 4 38 118 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 17 17 30 30 970 970 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 11.8% 17.6% 6.7% 13.3% 3.9% 12.2% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 1 0 20 21 406 540 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 22 22 69 69 2,034 2,034 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 4.5% 0.0% 29.0% 30.4% 20.0% 26.5% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for housing status at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 10

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Criminal Justice Status - Clients with No Arrests during Provider Region IV Statewide the Prior 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 453 442 1,622 1,621 20,977 21,228 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 494 494 1,745 1,745 22,266 22,266 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 91.7% 89.5% 93.0% 92.9% 94.2% 95.3% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 93 97 307 326 9,397 9,643 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 105 105 347 347 10,083 10,083 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 88.6% 92.4% 88.5% 93.9% 93.2% 95.6% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 277 319 759 906 11,084 12,211 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 330 330 930 930 12,412 12,412 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 83.9% 96.7% 81.6% 97.4% 89.3% 98.4% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 17 18 29 31 971 990 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 18 18 31 31 991 991 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 94.4% 100.0% 93.5% 100.0% 98.0% 99.9% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 23 23 70 67 2,005 2,028 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 23 23 70 70 2,050 2,050 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.7% 97.8% 98.9% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for number of arrests in the prior 30 days at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 11

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Alcohol Abstinence - Clients with No Alcohol Use at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 138 144 433 491 4,618 5,786 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 177 177 661 661 8,042 8,042 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 78.0% 81.4% 65.5% 74.3% 57.4% 71.9% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 30 30 62 82 1,451 2,202 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 44 44 124 124 3,195 3,195 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 68.2% 68.2% 50.0% 66.1% 45.4% 68.9% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 88 102 79 174 442 2,223 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 104 104 278 278 3,302 3,302 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 84.6% 98.1% 28.4% 62.6% 13.4% 67.3% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 3 4 6 8 185 223 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 4 4 8 8 292 292 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 75.0% 100.0% 75.0% 100.0% 63.4% 76.4% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 3 3 13 16 388 565 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 3 3 24 24 763 763 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 100.0% 100.0% 54.2% 66.7% 50.9% 74.0% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 12

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Other Drug Abstinence - Clients with No Use of Drugs Other Provider Region IV Statewide than Alcohol at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 213 223 656 709 6,809 8,208 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 276 276 998 998 13,195 13,195 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 77.2% 80.8% 65.7% 71.0% 51.6% 62.2% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 36 35 101 136 2,904 3,954 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 47 47 201 201 6,414 6,414 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 76.6% 74.5% 50.2% 67.7% 45.3% 61.6% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 159 197 193 440 1,344 5,751 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 204 204 620 620 8,560 8,560 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 77.9% 96.6% 31.1% 71.0% 15.7% 67.2% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 13 13 21 18 423 447 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 13 13 22 22 581 581 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 100.0% 100.0% 95.5% 81.8% 72.8% 76.9% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 18 17 25 34 688 901 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 19 19 45 45 1,233 1,233 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 94.7% 89.5% 55.6% 75.6% 55.8% 73.1% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 13

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement - Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement/Prior 30 Days at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 138 209 322 414 4,776 6,991 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 333 333 1,347 1,347 18,446 18,446 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 41.4% 62.8% 23.9% 30.7% 25.9% 37.9% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 46 50 146 174 3,120 4,504 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 70 70 278 278 8,421 8,421 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 65.7% 71.4% 52.5% 62.6% 37.1% 53.5% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 191 298 244 665 3,516 9,202 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 304 304 857 857 11,915 11,915 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 62.8% 98.0% 28.5% 77.6% 29.5% 77.2% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 14 16 19 22 678 795 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 16 16 24 24 866 866 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 87.5% 100.0% 79.2% 91.7% 78.3% 91.8% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 21 21 45 57 1,205 1,698 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 21 21 66 66 2,002 2,002 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 100.0% 100.0% 68.2% 86.4% 60.2% 84.8% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for self-help group involvement at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 14

Provider Name (#): Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Date of Report: 9/30/2014 National Outcome Measures (NOMS) Data by Level of Care Social Connectedness/Supportive Social Interaction - Clients Provider Region IV Statewide with Supportive Interaction with Family and/or Friends/Prior 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 285 240 996 1,006 13,717 14,306 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 316 316 1,300 1,300 18,532 18,532 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 90.2% 75.9% 76.6% 77.4% 74.0% 77.2% Level II Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 59 54 245 249 6,300 6,676 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 67 67 274 274 8,323 8,323 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 88.1% 80.6% 89.4% 90.9% 75.7% 80.2% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 254 266 704 767 8,434 9,609 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 290 290 826 826 11,481 11,481 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 87.6% 91.7% 85.2% 92.9% 73.5% 83.7% Level III.1 (Halfway House) Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 13 15 20 21 696 804 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 15 15 23 23 844 844 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 86.7% 100.0% 87.0% 91.3% 82.5% 95.3% Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 20 21 59 66 1,491 1,713 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 21 21 67 67 1,918 1,918 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 95.2% 100.0% 88.1% 98.5% 77.7% 89.3% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for supportive interaction at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 15

Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Provider Performance and Outcomes Reports - SFY 2014 Admitted Patient/Client Demographics Provider Organization (Provider #) Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council (0631) Total # of Admissions 1,681 Avg. Age at Opening 30.4 Gender % N Living Arrangements % N Unduplicated 48.4% 814 % < 18 Years of Age 4.7% 79 Male 53.2% 895 Shelter/TLC/Safe Haven 1.9% 32 Prior SUD Serv. Episodes 69.9% 1,175 Patient/Client Race % N Female 46.8% 786 Hosp./Jail/Prison/Other Inst. 3.0% 50 Adms. by Level of Care % N American Indian 1.0% 17 Hispanic Ethnicity % N Own Home/Apartment 28.1% 473 Detoxification 33.4% 561 Alaska Native 0.0% 0 Puerto Rican 1.0% 16 Someone Else's Home/Apt. 45.1% 758 Level I 36.3% 610 Asian 0.5% 8 Mexican 0.3% 5 Res.Tx/Hwy.Hse/Rec.Home 20.4% 342 Level I - OMT 0.1% 1 Nat. Hawaiian/Pac. Isl. 0.0% 0 Cuban 0.0% 0 Health Insurance - None 31.5% 530 Level II 7.4% 125 Black/African Amer. 4.9% 83 Other Hispanic/Latino 0.1% 2 Employment Status % N Level III.5 19.9% 335 White 92.2% 1,550 Not Hispanic/Latino 97.6% 1,641 Full-Time 11.2% 188 Level III.1 1.2% 20 Other Single Race 1.4% 23 Hisp./Not Spec. 1.0% 17 Part-Time 9.7% 163 Recovery Home 1.7% 29 Marital Status % N % N Unemployed 53.8% 904 Children/Dependents % N Never Married 60.9% 1,023 Pregnant at Opening 1.2% 21 Not in Labor Force 25.2% 424 Children/25 and Younger 57.0% 959 Married 10.1% 170 DCFS Involved 11.7% 196 Problem Area % N Avg. # of Children/25 and Younger 1.1 Widowed 0.8% 14 Patient/English Prof. 100.0% 1,681 Alcohol 15.6% 263 Children/Elsewhere/Courts 8.0% 135 Divorced 21.2% 357 MISA Patient/Client 0.0% 0 Other Drugs 34.4% 578 # of Children/Elsewhere/Court Ord. 242 Separated 7.0% 117 Crim. Just. Referral 44.0% 740 Alcohol & Other Drugs 49.6% 833 Childrn./Lost Parental Rights 3.2% 54 Avg. Grade Completed 12.1 Arrested/Past 30 Days 10.9% 184 Alcohol/Drugs/Gambling 0.0% 0 # of Children/Lost Parental Rights 93 Less than H.S. Educ. 21.0% 353 Veteran Status - Yes 3.5% 58 Gambling Only 0.0% 0 Primary Substance Secondary Substance Alcohol: 38.4% (646); Cocaine/Crack: 2.7% (45); Marijuana: 16.9% (284) Alcohol: 16.6% (279); Cocaine/Crack: 5.0% (84); Marijuana: 25.7% (432) Heroin: 12.1% (203); Other Opiates: 9.8% (165); Methamphetamine: 13.7% (230) Heroin: 2.0% (33); Other Opiates: 4.8% (81); Methamphetamine: 7.6% (128) Benzodiazepines: 1.5% (26); Other Hallucinogens: 0.1% (1); None: 0.7% (11) Benzodiazepines: 2.8% (47); Inhalants: 0.7% (12); None: 31.1% (523) Used Primary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 26.8% (451) Used Secondary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 15.4% (259) Organization-wide Patient/Client Access and Discharge Indicators Provider - SFY 2014 Statewide - SFY 2014 Average Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date 6.8 Days 8.2 Days Median Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date 1.0 Days 0.0 Days % (#) of Admissions - No Reported Wait for Assessment 31.4% (528) 51.6% (38,213) % (#) of Discharged Patients/Clients - Completion of Services 40.8% (605) 51.9% (31,993) % (#) of Discharged Patients/Clients - DASA Administrative Discharges 0.3% (4) 4.2% (3,141) % (#) of Patients/Clients - Remain Opened/90 Days After Close of SFY 11.8% (198) 16.8% (12,454) Page 16