Techno-economic and ecological evaluation of a wood biorefinery



Similar documents
Biorefinery concepts in the paper industry

PEGRES project. Paper, bioenergy and Green chemicals from nonwood RESidues by a novel biorefinery. Juha Tanskanen

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ON COTTON AND VISCOSE FIBRES FOR TEXTILE PRODUCTION

The IMES Master Programme

New Energy Solutions from Biosciences: Research Activities at the Energy Biosciences Institute

Business strategy: dal progetto Pro.E.Sa agli investimenti per la realizzazione degli impianti

Sustainable production of biogas and bioethanol from waste

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Papapostolou 1, E. Kondili 1, J.K. Kaldellis 2

Biorefineries. International status quo and future directions. Ed de Jong / Rene van Ree

G u d b r a n d R ø d s r u d Te c h n o l o g y D i r e c t o r B u s i n e s s D e v e l o p m e n t B o r r e g a a r d A S

Efficient forest biomass supply chain for biorefineries A project for cross border cooperation

Basics of Kraft Pulping & Recovery Process. Art J. Ragauskas Institute of Paper Science and Technology Georgia Institute of Technology

20 TWh biodrivmedel genom jäsning - bioteknik KSLA Seminarium Jan Lindstedt SEKAB E-Technology

HYPE. High Efficiency Consolidated Bioprocess Technology for Lignocellulose Ethanol

ABENGOA. Second-Generation Biofuels: Ready for Take-off. Analyst and Investor Day. Javier Salgado Leirado Executive VP

From Biomass. NREL Leads the Way. to Biofuels

Second generation bioethanol: challenges and perspectives. Dr. Andre Koltermann, Group Vice President, Central R&D, Süd-Chemie AG

How To Gasify Wood And Agriculture Biomass

The sunliquid process - cellulosic ethanol from agricultural residues. Dr. Markus Rarbach Group Biotechnology Biofuels & Derivatives

Hydrothermal Upgrading of Lignite and Biomass. Dr Bill Rowlands Chief Scientist Ignite Energy Resources & Licella

BUILDING THE BUSINESS CASE FOR LARGE-SCALE UTILIZATION OF FOREST RESIDUES AS FEEDSTOCKS FOR PRODUCTION OF ENERGY COMMODITIES:

How To Improve Energy Efficiency In The Paper Industry

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Fortum Otso -bioliquid

LCA of biofuels: developments and constraints

How To Model Biomass

Control of fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates

Extracting Valuable Lignin for Biorefinary Production and Replacement of Fossil Fuels

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

WASTE TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY.

1. Measures to promote the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport

How To Understand The Environmental Impacts Of A Plastic Bottle

Pilot Project Rockstedt

Green Energy in Europe - Potentials and Prospects

The renewable materials company

A REVIEW ON SECOND GENERATION BIOFUEL: A COMPARISON OF ITS CARBON FOOTPRINTS ABSTRACT

Using Straw and MSW for Biorefineries in Denmark Technical Developments and Demonstration Activities

Consumer Products Made with Industrial Biotechnology

The LignoRef project; - A national research initiative to enhance biorefinery process developments in Norway -

BIOBASED MATERIALS ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Refinery Equipment of Texas. Mini - Refinery Feasibility Overview

Chair of Chemistry of Biogenic Resources TU München - R&D activities -

The European Renewable Energy Directive and international Trade. Laurent Javaudin Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.

Executive Summary. The Sustainability of Packaging Systems for Fruit and Vegetable Transport in Europe based on Life-Cycle-Analysis Update 2009

BIOVALUE PROJECT 2 ANDERS PETER S. ADAMSEN AARHUS UNIVERSITY HEALTH 04 JUNE 2015

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA DIPARTIMENTO INGEGNERIA CHIMICA MATERIALI AMBIENTE

Biomass-to an overview

Conclusions and Summary Report Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Highway Guard Rail Posts

Stand-alone and Biorefinery ways to produce bioenergy from solid biodiesel wastes in Colombia

Biorefinery competence building in Norway

NEPD nr.: 221E ver 2.1. The declaration has been prepared by Thale Plesser, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Efficient conversion of starch and cellulose from co-products of food industry and agriculture to ethanol

Environmental Product Declaration

The Feedstock Supply Chain and Centers of Energy Excellence Update

Finanzierung von Erneuerbaren Energie und Energieeffizienz Projekten in Asien. INTEC Engineering GmbH Berlin,

The Challenge of Co-product Management for Large-scale Energy Systems: Power, Fuel and CO₂

Ethanol from lignocellulose overview. Neue Krafstoffe Berlin, 6. Mai 2008

Avoiding co-product allocation in a simplified hypothetical refinery 1

The BOMBARDIER* REGINA*

XIVIA XYLITOL White PAPER. Sustainable and substantiated For more sustainable, healthier products

Algae Harvesting, Dewatering and Extraction

Carbon Sequestration Tool Background and User Guide

Renewable diesel from tall oil

Production of 2nd generation bioethanol from lucerne with optimized hydrothermal pretreatment

System Basics for the certification of sustainable biomass and bioenergy

Dr Jonas Joelsson

Methodology CO 2 -tool for electricity, gas and heat from biomass

Liquid Biofuels for Transport

Integrating a Renewable Energy Degree into an Existing Mechanical Engineering Program

CARBON ASSESSMENT TICKETING DELIVERY SYSTEMS

LCA of different conventional crude oil production technologies Dipl.-Ing. Oliver Schuller

AGRICULTURE FOR FOOD AND FOR BIOENEGY: IS IT POSSIBLE?

Renewable Energy from Biomass. Opportunities in London and Area? Eric Rosen

27th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition ENERGY PAYBACK TIME AND CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ELKEM SOLAR SILICON

Municipal Solid Waste Used as Bioethanol Sources and its Related Environmental Impacts

Valmet biotechnologies and pyrolysis status update. Joakim Autio Product manager, Pyrolysis systems Valmet

BASF Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

Use of Substitute Fuels in Large Combustion Plants (LCPs)

GYPSUM ASSOCIATION LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

BBI JU Calls 2015 Strategic priorities, content and timing. Agata PIENIADZ BBI JU Project Manager Info Day, 26 June 2015

UPM Grow with Biofore. Vesiyhdistyksen Jätevesijaoston seminaari Esa Laurinsilta

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

Eco- and water efficiency development prospects in Pulp-Board integrate.

DELIVERING THE BIOENERGY TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE TO THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY

Renewable energy in transport

Harvesting energy with fertilizers

310 Exam Questions. 1) Discuss the energy efficiency, and why increasing efficiency does not lower the amount of total energy consumed.

A Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Select Gas-to-Liquid Fuels with Conventional Fuels in the Transportation Sector

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

Review Timber as a Building Material - An environmental comparison against synthetic building materials

Transcription:

Techno-economic and ecological evaluation of a wood biorefinery Martina Haase 1, Magnus Fröhling 1, Jörg Schweinle 2, Birgit Himmelreich 3 1) Industrial Production, Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 2) Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics 3) Bayer Technology Services GmbH Industrial Production (IIP) Biorefinica 2009, January 27-28, DBU Osnabrück, Germany

Content Introduction Methodology for the evaluation of process chains for biomass utilization Reference configuration of the modelled biorefinery Modelling of material and energy flows along the whole value chain Economic evaluation of the wood biorefinery Ecological evaluation of the wood biorefinery Summary Industrial Production (IIP) 2

Increasing use of biomass in fossil based industries Replacement of limited fossil raw materials Increasing prices for non-renewable raw materials Reduction of dependency on crude oil imports and securing of raw material supply Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Increase of competition for biomass and arable land through new biomass utilization concepts Enhancement of research and development regarding new conversion technologies Industrial Production (IIP) 3

Possible process steps and potential products of a wood biorefinery Feedstock Precursors Platform chemicals Lignocellulosic Biomass Disintegration, Separation Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin Enzymatic conversion Chemical conversion Glucose Xylose Furfural Phenolderivatives Wood chips Bark Possible solvents: - Ethanol/Water - Ionic Liquids - H 2 SO 4 Potential material utilisation, e.g. - Binding agents - Fillers - Polymer compounds - Pulp - Cellulose derivatives e.g. chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis Subsequent processing to various products, e.g. - Fuel additives - Polyethylene - PLA - Acrylic acid Industrial Production (IIP) 4

Objectives of the techno-economic economic and ecological evaluation Estimation of production costs and environmental effects of a process chain for the use of biomass at an early stage of process development Determination of economic and ecological key parameters and their influence on the sustainability of the process chain Identification of cost-effective and environmentally sound process configurations Industrial Production (IIP) 5

Methodology for the evaluation of process chains Determination of a reference configuration Modelling of material and energy flows along the whole value chain (e.g.: Material flow analysis, process simulation) Estimation of raw and auxiliary material flows, energy demand, waste streams, products and emissions for different scenarios Estimation of investments and production costs Investment related costs, operating costs, costs for disposal, labor,... Estimation of environmental impacts E.g. acidification, global warming potential, eutrophication, CED,... Location and logistics planning Availability of raw materials, infrastructure, consideration of different plant sizes,... Sensitivity analysis Industrial Production (IIP) 6

Reference configuration of the modelled biorefinery Plant capacity: 400.000 t dry wood/year Load: 50 t dry wood/h (8000 h/year) Feedstock properties : Wood chips of residual wood (P100, 50% water content), 42 % cellulose, 29% hemicellulose, 24% lignin, 5% others Organosolv pulping: Ethanol/Water mixture (50/50) T = 180 C, p = 18bar Ratio wood : solvent = 1 : 6 Enzymatic conversion of cellulose: Conversion rate to glucose: 82% Cellulase and beta-glucosidase enzymes Hemicellulose fraction: Solute hemicellulose fragments after organosolv pulping are subsumed to xylose Final products: Main product: Glucose (solution ~16 mass-%), Byproducts: Xylose (solution ~5 mass-%), lignin (dry) Industrial Production (IIP) 7

Major process steps for the production of glucose from wood CO 2, H 2 O, solar radiation Forest production Transport Disintegration Separation of components Biological production, Forest maint. Wood harvest/ chipping Lorry EtOH, H 2 O T = 180 C p = 18 bar Precipitation Filtration Centrifugation Solvent recovery Enzymatic hydrolysis Glucose Xylose Lignin Flash- Separator Cellulase Distillation β-glucosidase Industrial Production (IIP) 8

Modelling of material and energy flows along the whole value chain Umberto material and energy flow network Transport P12: Emissions, waste materials P6: Energy Disintegration and separation of components P12: Emissions, waste materials P6: Energy P18: Solvent P2:Raw and auxiliary materials P9:Wood chips P13: UPR T10:Transport T1: Disintegration and separation of components P15: Wood P5: Cellulose fraction P10: Lignin fraction T12: Forest production P12: Emissions, waste materials P2:Raw and auxiliary materials P7: Cellulose fraction T4: Water addition T11: Dryer P12: Emissions, waste materials P6: Energy P6: Energy P2:Raw and auxiliary materials P2:Raw and auxiliary materials T8: Enzymatic conversion Forest production P6: Energy P12: Emissions, waste materials P3:Glucose P8:Xylose Further processing of components P25: Lignin Industrial Production (IIP) 9

Subnet Disintegration and separation of components (Sankey Diagram) P16: Steam P6: Energy P12:Effluents P2:Raw and auxiliary materials P18: Solvent T15: Distillation P6: Energy T3: Solvent compression P9: Lösung T5: Heat exchanger P13: Steam T9: Flash P24: Solution P8: Hemicellulose fraction P7: Solvent P4:Water P30: Wood chips P17:Solvent mixture P11: Suspension T2: Disintegration reactor T6: Centrifuge/decanter T8: Lignin precipitation P14: Residue P20 T13: Centrifuge/ decanter P22 P6: Energy P10:Lignin fraction T4: Heat exchanger P5: Steam T1: Pressure release/ decanter P3 P2:Raw and auxiliary materials P16: Steam P6: Energy P1: Residue P12:Effluents T14: Cellulose washing P31: Cellulose fraction P2:Raw and auxiliary materials Ethanol Water Wood / -components Industrial Production (IIP) 10

Methodology for economic analysis Estimation of investments: - +/- 30% accuracy - Site infrastructure completely available and useable (outside battery limits neglected) Determination of glucose production costs: - Variable costs and credits o Costs for raw and operating materials (wood chips, ethanol, water, enzymes) o Energy costs (electricity, steam, cooling) o Costs for sewage disposal o Credits for by-products (lignin as high grade product, xylose) - Investment related costs (depreciations, taxes and insurance, reparation and maintenance, costs of capital) - Labour costs Costs for sales, administration and research are not yet determined Industrial Production (IIP) 11

Structure of costs and credits for the base scenario 400 Enzymes 200 EtOH Costs [ /t Glucose] 0 Wood Water Electricity Cooling Steam Capital costs Rep./Maint. Tax./Ins. Depr. Admin. Labour Effluents Lignin -200 Xylose -400 Input materials Energy Invest. dep. costs Other costs Credits Industrial Production (IIP) 12

Estimation of glucose production costs for different scenarios Consideration of different wood : solvent ratios Requirement for economic efficiency: production costs << market price for glucose 400 ~ Glucose market price Input materials Energy Invest. dep. costs Other costs /t Glucose 0 Credits Production costs Market price glucose Scenario -400 Base 2 3 4 Wood : solvent 1:6 1:8 1:4 1:4 opt Industrial Production (IIP) 13

Sensitivity analysis for the base scenario Prices for wood chips and lignin mainly influence glucose production costs 80 60 Production costs variation [%] 40 20 0-20 -40-60 -80-50 -40-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Parameter variation [%] Lignin price Wood chips price Ethanol price Enzymes price Investment Steam price Industrial Production (IIP) 14

Methodology for ecological evaluation Methodology for life cycle assessment (LCA) according to the international standard DIN EN ISO 14040 and 14044 Goal and scope definition and life cycle inventory analysis - Cradle to gate analysis including forest production (wood maintenance, wood harvest/chipping), wood transport and the biorefinery processes - Integration of supply chains for the provision of energy and operating materials (ecoinvent v2.0 LCI database) Selection of impact categories, e.g. global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication Life cycle impact assessment (e.g. allocation of emissions to the corresponding impact categories and conversion to indicator values, e.g. CO 2 equivalents) Industrial Production (IIP) 15

Ecological evaluation Examples (1) Determination of proportions of particular process steps to the emission equivalents of selected impact categories (base scenario) 100% Fuel provision (forest mainten., wood harvest) Fuel combustion (forest mainten., wood harvest) Provision of diesel fuel (wood transport) 50% Fuel combustion (wood transport) Provision of electricity (process plant) Provision of steam (process plant) 0% CO2 equiv. SO2 equiv. PO4 equiv. Provision of auxiliary materials for the process plant (enzymes, ethanol, water) Global warming potential Acidification Eutrophication Uncertainties for contributions caused by enzymes production especially for PO 4 -Eq. Industrial Production (IIP) 16

Ecological evaluation Examples (2) Comparision of indicator values (CO 2 - and SO 2 - equivalents) for different scenarios Different scenarios result in different conclusions for several impact categories CO2-Equivalents SO2-Equivalents 30 70 t CO2-Equiv./h kg SO2-Equiv./h 0 0 Base scenario Scenario "wood for Base scenario 1 : 6 steam generation" 1 : 6 Scenario "wood for steam generation" Prov. of auxiliary materials for the process plant (enzymes, ethanol, water) Provision of electricity (process plant) Provision of diesel fuel (wood transport) Provision of steam (process plant) Fuel combustion (wood transport) Fuel combustion (forest mainten., wood harvest) Fuel provision (forest mainten., wood harvest) Industrial Production (IIP) 17

Ecological evaluation Examples (3) Comparison of CO 2 - and SO 2 - equivalents of the biorefinery with the production of potential reference products Assumptions: - Sugar from a sugar refinery as reference product for xylose and glucose - Phenol from a phenol plant as reference product for lignin Consideration of different wood : solvent ratios Biorefinery causes lower environmental effects compared to the reference processes 1 50 220 165 t CO2 equiv./ h 25 kg SO2 equiv./ h 110 55 0 Biorefinery 1:6 Biorefinery 1:8 Biorefinery 1:4 Biorefinery 1:4opt Reference processes 0 Biorefinery 1:6 Biorefinery 1:8 Biorefinery 1:4 Biorefinery 1:4opt Reference processes Lignin Xylose Glucose Sugar from sugar refinery Phenol from phenol plant 1 Values for reference processes derived from the ecoinvent v2.0 LCI database Industrial Production (IIP) 18

Summary Development of new concepts for the non-energetic use of biomass, e.g. wood biorefineries producing platform chemicals Modelling of mass and energy flows of a wood biorefinery along the whole value chain for different scenarios Early-stage techno-economic and ecological evaluation for the identification of sustainable production processes Economic efficiency highly depends on prices for raw materials and the sales price for lignin Further improvement of process design is necessary to enhance economic efficiency Steam and electricity generation are crucial for the extent of GHG emissions Analysis of different impact categories may lead to different conclusions Industrial Production (IIP) 19

Thank you for your attention! Industrial Production (IIP) Hertzstr. 16 76187 Karlsruhe Dipl.-Umweltwiss. Martina Haase +49 (0)721 608-4467 martina.haase@wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de Dr. rer. pol. Magnus Fröhling +49 (0)721 608-4400 magnus.froehling@wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de This work is part of the research project Pilotprojekt Lignocellulose Bioraffinerie, supported by the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) and attended by the FNR. Industrial Production (IIP)