A Preliminary Report The May 19, 2011 Simav, Turkey Earthquake



Similar documents
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRIGGERED 2011 VAN-EDREMİT EARTHQUAKE AND INDUCED DAMAGE

Preliminary damage survey report on 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

Ground motion predictive modelling based on genetic algorithms

Chincha and Cañete, Peru, Based

Earthquakes: Interesting Facts and F.A.Q.

ENGINEERING-BASED EARTHQUAKE RISK MANAGEMENT

Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction. 2nd Edition

Using Remotely Sensed Data From ASTER to Look Impact of Recent Earth Quakes in Gujarat, India.

Presentations. Session 1. Slide 1. Earthquake Risk Reduction. 1- Concepts & Terminology

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

RAILROAD LIFELINE DAMAGE IN EARTHQUAKES

Field reconnaissance on August 25 th, after August 24 th, 2016 Central Italy Earthquake

Chapter. Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories

THE STUDY ON A DISASTER PREVENTION/MITIGATION BASIC PLAN IN ISTANBUL PART 2 - EVALUATION OF URBAN VULNERABILITY -

AFAD DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KUVVETLİ YER HAREKETİ ve ÖN HASAR TAHMİN SİSTEMLERİ ÇALIŞMA GRUBU. (Rapid Estimation Damage)

RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ON STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF DAMAGES IN A RECENT EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN

Seismic Isolation Retrofitting of Japanese Wooden Buildings

How To Prepare For An Earthquake In Central United States

In this study analytical investigation of effect of retrofit application using carbon fiber (CFRP) on seismic behavior of a monumental building at

ICOLD POSITION PAPER ON DAM SAFETY AND EARTHQUAKES

M=5.6 VAN EARTHQUAKE ON 09/11/2011

EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE

ISTANBUL EARTHQUAKE RISK AND MITIGATION STUDIES

Scope of Insurance Premium for Residential Houses against Seismic Risk in Japan

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES

KCC Event Brief: 2014 La Habra Earthquake

Predicting Seismic Vulnerable Zones using GIS. Outline of the presentation. Objectives. Risk Mapping Overview Factor Maps. Three levels of Zonation

UrEDAS, URGENT EARTHQUAKE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM, NOW AND FUTURE

Landslides & Mudflows

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION SCHOOL STANDARDS

A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE WAVES GENERATED

SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND RETROFITTING OF R.C.C STRUCTURE

Reading GPS Time Series Plots Worksheet

Control of Seismic Drift Demand for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Weak First Stories

Development of Emergent Alarm System using the Earthquake Early Warning by Japan Meteorological Agencyed from Microtremor Records

2006 Kiholo Bay, Hawaii Earthquake

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

Seismic Isolated Hospital Design Practice in Turkey: Erzurum Medical Campus

A Report on Post-Earthquake Rapid Visual Damage Assessment of Buildings Of Tribhuvan International Airport

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

The earthquake source

ABSG Consulting, Tokyo, Japan 2. Professor, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan 3

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria for Large Storage Dams

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGAINST THE NATURAL DISASTERS OF TURKEY: MITIGATION, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ISSUES

The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China

Vibration Isolation in Data Centers

Site C Clean Energy Project Topic Specific Sessions: Presentation by Natural Resources Canada

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE NORTHSTAR #1 CLASS II INJECTION WELL AND THE SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO AREA

CHAPTER SEISMIC RISK MITIGATION PRACTICES IN SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY

Development of Guidance Information for the Repair and Rebuilding of Houses Following the Canterbury Earthquake Series

Numerical Modeling Earthquake Effects On Sea Outfall Systems : Kadýköy Sea Outfall Case

The correct answers are given below. Some talking points have been added for the teachers use.

CONTRIBUTION TO THE IAEA SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION KARISMA BENCHMARK

Engineering Geological Asset Management for Large Dams. Yasuhito SASAKI (1)

Seismic retrofitting on structures in urban areas

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

DISASTER RESISTANCE EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES

SMIP2000 Seminar Proceedings COSMOS VIRTUAL STRONG MOTION DATA CENTER. Ralph Archuleta

Post Earthquake Quick Damage Inspection of Buildings in Nepal

Overview. NRC Regulations for Seismic. Applied to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. NRC History. How we Regulate

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

Strong earthquakes in seismic regions are inevitable! Build your house safely to avoid future disaster!

RAILROAD DAMAGE FROM THE OCTOBER 16, 1999 HECTOR MINE EARTHQUAKE

Property Inspection. 83A Ascot Avenue North New Brighton Christchurch STRUCTURAL REPORT

A RACE WITH TIME IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION

EARTHQUAKE. Definition of Hazard. History of Hazard as it Affects the City of Kent. Hazard Identification

GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES OF LANDSLIDES CHARACTERISTICS MECHANISMS PREPARDNESS: BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER A LANDSLIDE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSIONS

Safety of Small/Rural Dams and Barrier Lake Management

SEISMIC DAMAGE ESTIMATION PROCEDURE FOR WATER SUPPLY PIPELINES

6.0 Results of Risk Analyses

Risks of future Earthquake- and extreme hydrological Disasters in Southeast Asia with a Focus on Thailand

FOURTH GRADE EARTHQUAKES 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Case Studies of Seismic Nonstructural Retrofitting in. School Facilities

Applying GIS in seismic hazard assessment and data integration for disaster management

Strengthening of Brick Masonry Walls against Earthquake Loading

SEISMIC RETROFITTING STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGES IN MODERATE EARTHQUAKE REGIONS

DAMAGE TO WOOD BUILDINGS DURING THE GREAT TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE PART2- DAMAGE DUE TO GROUND MOTION

Repair and strengthening guide for earthquake damaged lowrise domestic buildings in Gujarat, India

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

Outline of Guidelines for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dams During Large Earthquakes (Draft)

EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFITTING OF UNSYMMETRICAL MEDIUM RISE BUILDINGS- A CASE STUDY

COSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012

4 EFFECTS OF SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE ON INFRASTRUCTURE

Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD)

SEISMIC DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF POTABLE WATER PIPELINES

Local Seismic Hazard in Alpine Environment From Site Effects to Induced Phenomena Donat Fäh Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zürich

Earthquake Hazards and Risks

Name Date Class. By studying the Vocabulary and Notes listed for each section below, you can gain a better understanding of this chapter.

Earthquakes and Data Centers

Earthquakes. Earthquakes: Big Ideas. Earthquakes

Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas

Seismic Retrofitting for School Buildings in Japan Nonstructual Seismic Retrofitting

ICOLD s revised seismic design and performance criteria for large storage dams

Exploring plate motion and deformation in California with GPS

ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN VIETNAM IN TERMS OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCES

Transcription:

A Preliminary Report The May 19, 2011 Simav, Turkey Earthquake Ömer AYDAN Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan Visiting Professor, İstanbul Technical University Halil KUMSAR Pamukkale University May 24, 2011

CONTENTS Major Characteristics Location and Geography Geology, Tectonics and Pre-post Seismicity Faulting Mechanism Strong Ground Motions Damage (building, geotechnical, lifelines, dams, transportation) Sources of Information

MAJOR CHARACERISTICS OF THE EARTHQUAKE Location: near Simav town of Kütahya Prefecture of Turkey Date: 23:15 (TST) on May 19, 2011 Magnitude: Mw 5.8-5.9; Ms 6.0; ML 5.7-5.9 Faulting Mechanism: Normal faulting with dextral strike slip component associated with West Anadolu Fault System Casulaties: 2 people as of May 21, 2011 Injured: 85 people Affected population: 30000 2052 households heavily damaged or collapsed

Major towns and villages in the epicentral area Map from Google

Geology-Faults Modified from Oygür & Erler, 2000 (TJK, 43(1), 7-19)

Focal Mechanisms of Past Major Earthquakes

Pre-Regional Seismicity

Aftershock Activity Base map from EMSC

Focal Mechanism Normal faulting along north dipping fault. The fault belongs to Simav fault zone This fault is said to be normal fault with a dextral lateral component. The earthquake fault is a normal fault with a dextral lateral component. From EMSC

Fault Striation Measurement and Their Focal Mechanism sinistral dextral Two different fault striations on oblique normal faults were observed. One of them has a dextral lateral component while the other one has a sinistral component.

Gediz Strong Motions Emet From AFAD

Views of some of strong motion stations in the epicentral area Gediz Simav Complete record at Simav SMS could not be obtained due to power loss

ACCELERATION(gal) ACCELERATION(gal) Spectra of Selected Strong Motion Stations ACCELERATION(gal) ACCELERATION(gal) 400 300 200 GEDIZ Simav-Kutahya (M5.9 2011) EW (h=5%) EW NS UD 300 200 EMET Simav-Kutahya (M5.9 2011) EW (h=5%) EW NS UD 100 100 0 1 2 3 NATURAL PERIOD(s) 0 1 2 3 NATURAL PERIOD(s) 60 50 40 30 DURSUNBEY Simav-Kutahya (M5.9 2011) EW (h=5%) EW NS UD 80 60 40 AKHISAR Simav-Kutahya (M5.9 2011) EW (h=5%) EW NS UD 20 10 20 0 1 2 3 NATURAL PERIOD(s) 0 1 2 3 NATURAL PERIOD(s)

Permanent Ground Movements obtained from EPS method 100 mm Base map from Google

MAXIMUM GROUND ACCELERATION (gal) Amax & Vmax Attenuation MAXIMUM GROUND VELOCITY (kine) 300 2011 Simav Earthquake V s =259 m/s =0,180 =90 =270 Observation Aydan(2001)-soil 40 20 10 2011 Simav Earthquake M s =5.8 M w =5.8 M L =5.9 100 4 30 M s =5.8 M w =5.8 M L =5.9 10 10 20 40 100 200 HYPOCENTER DISTANCE (km) 2 1 V s =259 m/s =0,180 =90 =270 Observation 0.4 10 20 40 100 200 HYPOCENTER DISTANCE (km)

Collapse of Simple Structures Gökçeler Gökçeler Simav Simav Yeşilova

Investigation Routes Base map from Google

Building Damage Mosques Monuments Hımış Building (Timber Frame with adobe infill walls) Stone Masonry Buildings Brick Masonry Buildings Reinforced Concrete Buildings Non-structural damage

Simav Mosque 1

Simav Mosque 2

Simav Mosque 3 Yeşilova Mosque

Karaderbent Mosque Damaged in 1970 Gediz Earthquake

Performance of some historical tombs and monuments

Damage to Hımış or masonry buildings Gökçeler Simav Karaderbent Karamanca

Simav - Downtown Complete collapse of ground floor due to soft floor problem

Koyuncuoğlu High School. Soft floor problem

Simav - Esenler Damage at lower floors due to cracking between frame and infill walls

Simav - Esenler Damage at lower floors due to cracking between frame and infill walls

Non-structural damage(window Glass Breakage)

Kanal-1 Bridge (near Eynal Spa) No damage except dislocation of embankment protection stone blocks

Non-damaged bridges Near Gökçeler Near Gökçeler Near Gökçeler

Damage to Lifelines Yeşilova Substation Pumping Stations Water pipes

Yeşilova Sub-station No major problem. 12-13cm dislocation of transformers and perimetrical damage to infill walls

Drinking water facilities Yeşilova Karamanca Simav

Geotechnical Damage Liquefaction Embankment failure Retaining-wall failure Slope Failure and Rock Falls Performance of Earthfill Dam Performance of Eti Gümüş Tailing dams

Soil Liquefaction There is a at least a 8 m thick clay layer at top. The buildings on flat ground are founded over this clay layer. The site investigation clearly shows that there are some slight settlement of ground up-to 5 cm in the downtown of Simav. This may imply a partial liquefaction of soil layers below the top clay layer.furthermore, this top soft layer may amplify ground motions with peculiar frequencies. Simav Settlement Uplift

Embankment failure (Near Gökçeler)

Retaining-wall failure (near Gökçeler)

Near Söğüt Toppling Failure and Rock Falls Near Karamanca Near Karamanca Near Karamanca

Planar or wedge sliding failure Near Söğüt Near Karamanca Near Karamanca Near Karamanca Near Karamanca

Non-damaged earthfill dam near Gökçeler The earthfill dam was not damaged although it was 1 km away from the epicenter

Performance of Eti Gümüş Tailing dams Plan View Tailing dam between 2nd & 3rd ponds Tailing dams failed due to piping and overtopping the newly elevated part over the existing dam before the earthquake. The perimetrical dam has been strengthened now. The maximum ground acceleration at the dam site by this earthquake should be about 20 gals, which could not induce any damage to tailings dams. Open-pit mine

References Aydan, Ö., M. Sezaki, R. Yarar (1996). The seismic characteristics of Turkish Earthquakes. The 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Eng., CD-2, Paper No:1270. Aydan, Ö. and Ohta, Y. (2011a): A new proposal for strong ground motion estimations with the consideration of characteristics of earthquake fault. Seventh National Conference on Earthquake Engineering,, Istanbul, Turkey. Aydan, Ö. and Ohta, Y. (2011b):The erratic pattern screening (EPS) method for estimation of co-seismic defromation of ground from acceleration records and its applications.. Seventh National Conference on Earthquake Engineering,, Istanbul, Turkey. EMSC:http://www.emsc-csem.org/ ED:http://www.deprem.gov.tr/ Google Map:http://maps.google.com/

KOERI:http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/ Oygür, V. and Erler, A. (2000):Metallogeny of the Simav Grab en (Inner-Western Anatolia, Turkey). Geological Bulletin of Turkey Vol.43, No. 1, 7-19. USGS: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Yavuz Erkmen, the Governor and İl Özel İdare of Denizli Province for logistic support and the participation of Recep Demirci of İl Afet and Acil Durum Director of Denizli Province and Erhan Ar of İl Özel Director of Kütahya Province and information on strong motions records and stations given by Turgay Kuru of Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ankara.