Pure risk premiums under deductibles



Similar documents
Visualization Tools for Insurance Risk Processes

( ) = ( ) = {,,, } β ( ), < 1 ( ) + ( ) = ( ) + ( )

Optimal reinsurance with ruin probability target

A Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails

Satistical modelling of clinical trials

( ) = 1 x. ! 2x = 2. The region where that joint density is positive is indicated with dotted lines in the graph below. y = x

INSURANCE RISK THEORY (Problems)

Math 370/408, Spring 2008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand. Actuarial Exam Practice Problem Set 3 Solutions

NON-LIFE INSURANCE PRICING USING THE GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODEL, SMOOTHING SPLINES AND L-CURVES

Errata and updates for ASM Exam C/Exam 4 Manual (Sixteenth Edition) sorted by page

A Log-Robust Optimization Approach to Portfolio Management

5-3 Polynomial Functions. not in one variable because there are two variables, x. and y

ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 21 Insurance, Portfolio Choice - Questions

FACTORING IN QUADRATIC FIELDS. 1. Introduction. This is called a quadratic field and it has degree 2 over Q. Similarly, set

A Coefficient of Variation for Skewed and Heavy-Tailed Insurance Losses. Michael R. Powers[ 1 ] Temple University and Tsinghua University

Midterm March (a) Consumer i s budget constraint is. c i b i c i H 12 (1 + r)b i c i L 12 (1 + r)b i ;

Benchmark Rates for XL Reinsurance Revisited: Model Comparison for the Swiss MTPL Market

( ) is proportional to ( 10 + x)!2. Calculate the

Manual for SOA Exam MLC.

Numerical Solution of Differential Equations

Survival Analysis of Left Truncated Income Protection Insurance Data. [March 29, 2012]

The Ramsey Discounting Formula for a Hidden-State Stochastic Growth Process / 8

Mixing internal and external data for managing operational risk

Probability Calculator

Math 132. Population Growth: the World

DEDUCTIBLES IN INDUSTRIAL FIRE INSURANCE

Stop Loss Reinsurance

STA 256: Statistics and Probability I

How To Find Out If A Tax System Is More Efficient

Exam C, Fall 2006 PRELIMINARY ANSWER KEY

Universal Life Insurance

Section 6.1 Joint Distribution Functions

Approximation of Aggregate Losses Using Simulation

GLMs: Gompertz s Law. GLMs in R. Gompertz s famous graduation formula is. or log µ x is linear in age, x,

Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: 3-Step Approaches Using Mplus

Basel II: Operational Risk Implementation based on Risk Framework

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

AGGREGATE CLAIMS, SOLVENCY AND REINSURANCE. David Dickson, Centre for Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne. Cherry Bud Workshop

Lecture 8: More Continuous Random Variables

Modelling Uncertainty in Claims Experience to Price General Insurance Contracts

Pricing Options with Discrete Dividends by High Order Finite Differences and Grid Stretching

4.3 Least Squares Approximations

**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION** The annual number of claims for an insured has probability function: , 0 < q < 1.

WARM UP EXERCSE. 2-1 Polynomials and Rational Functions

Order Statistics. Lecture 15: Order Statistics. Notation Detour. Order Statistics, cont.

General Theory of Differential Equations Sections 2.8, , 4.1

Java Modules for Time Series Analysis

Modeling Individual Claims for Motor Third Party Liability of Insurance Companies in Albania

A note on exact moments of order statistics from exponentiated log-logistic distribution

RISKY LOSS DISTRIBUTIONS AND MODELING THE LOSS RESERVE PAY-OUT TAIL

Review of Random Variables

EARLY WARNING INDICATOR FOR TURKISH NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Particular Solutions. y = Ae 4x and y = 3 at x = 0 3 = Ae = A y = 3e 4x

Claim Size Distributions in German Private Health Insurance

Reinsurance 101: How it Works and the Impact on the Marketplace

Retirement and Benefits, Risk Management, and Procurement (revised 3/5/14)

Template 1: Test Helicopter

Statistical Data Mining. Practical Assignment 3 Discriminant Analysis and Decision Trees

3. The Economics of Insurance

Optimal Health Insurance for Prevention and Treatment

4. Simple regression. QBUS6840 Predictive Analytics.

TRANSACTIONS JUNE, 1969 AN UPPER BOUND ON THE STOP-LOSS NET PREMIUM--ACTUARIAL NOTE NEWTON L. BOWERS, JR. ABSTRACT

Online Appendix to Stochastic Imitative Game Dynamics with Committed Agents

Best Estimate of the Technical Provisions

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4. Daniel Markov 1 173

Enhancing Business Resilience under Power Shortage: Effective Allocation of Scarce Electricity Based on Power System Failure and CGE Models

Properties of Future Lifetime Distributions and Estimation

Lecture 4: The Black-Scholes model

Underwriting risk control in non-life insurance via generalized linear models and stochastic programming

Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, and Differential Equations

A Unifying Pricing Theory for Insurance and Financial Risks: Applications for a Unified Risk Management


THE NUMBER OF GRAPHS AND A RANDOM GRAPH WITH A GIVEN DEGREE SEQUENCE. Alexander Barvinok

Bayesian prediction of disability insurance frequencies using economic indicators

Volatility Density Forecasting & Model Averaging Imperial College Business School, London

"Essential Mathematics & Statistics for Science" by Dr G Currell & Dr A A Dowman (John Wiley & Sons) Answers to In-Text Questions

RentersPLUS Move In Special

Tests for exponentiality against the M and LM-classes of life distributions

Scheduling and capacity estimation in LTE. Olav Østerbø, Telenor CD (Corporate Development) ITC-23, September 6-8, 2011, San Francisco

Chapter 29 Scale-Free Network Topologies with Clustering Similar to Online Social Networks

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Math 370, Actuarial Problemsolving Spring 2008 A.J. Hildebrand. Practice Test, 1/28/2008 (with solutions)

Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a one-cycle criterion

Choosing Probability Distributions in Simulation

2 Integrating Both Sides

Transcription:

Pure risk premiums under deductibles K. Burnecki J. Nowicka-Zagrajek A. Wy lomańska Hugo Steinhaus Center Wroc law University of Technology www.im.pwr.wroc.pl/ hugo/

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 1 Introduction The idea of a deductible is, firstly, to reduce claim handling costs by excluding coverage for the often numerous small claims and, secondly, to provide some motivation to the insured to prevent claims, throught a limited degree of participation in claim costs. The reasons for introducing deductibles: (i) loss prevention (ii) loss reduction (iii) avoidance of small claims where administration costs are dominant (iv) premium reduction.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 2 General formulae for premiums under deductibles Let X be a risk. A premium calculation principle is a rule saying what premium should be assigned to a given risk. We consider the simplest premium which is called pure risk premium, namely the mean of X. It is often applied in life and some mass lines of business in non-life insurance. The pure risk premium can be of practical use because, for one thing, in practice the planning horizon is always limited and for another, because there are indirect ways of loading a premium.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 3 Let X a non-negative random variable describing the size of claim (assume EX exists), F (t) distribution of X, f(t) probability function, h(x) the payment function corresponding to a deductible. The pure risk premium P is then equal to the expectation (P =EX). We will express formulae for premiums under deductibles in terms of so-called limited expected value function E(X, x) = x 0 yf(y)dy + x(1 F (x)), x > 0.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 4 Franchise deductible One of the deductibles that can be incorporated in the contract is a co-called franchise deductible. Under the franchise deductible of a, if the loss is less than a amount the insurer pays nothing, but if the loss equals or exceeds a amount claim is paid in full.the payment function can be described by h F D(a) (x) = 0, x < a, x, otherwise.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 5 Franchise deductible cont. The pure risk premium under the franchise deductible can be expressed in terms of the premium in the case of no deductible and the corresponding limited expected value function: P F D(a) = P E(X, a) + a(1 F (a)). This premium is a decreasing function of a, when a = 0 the premium is equal to the one in the case of no deductible and if a tends to infinity the premium tends to zero.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 6 Figure 1: The payment function under the franchise deductible (solid line) and no deductible (dashed line). STFded01.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 7 Fixed amount deductible An agreement between the insured and the insurer incorporating a deductible b means that the insurer pays only the part of the claim which exceeds the amount b; if the size of the claim falls below this amount, then the claim is not covered by the contract and the insured receives no indemnification. The payment function is thus given by h F AD(b) (x) = max(0, x b).

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 8 Fixed amount deductible cont. The premium in the case of fixed amount deductible has the following form in terms of the premium under the franchise deductible. P F AD(b) = P E(X, b) = P F D(b) b(1 F (b)). The premium is a decreasing function of b, for b = 0 it gives the premium in the case of no deductible and if b tends to infinity, it tends to zero.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 9 Figure 2: The payment function under the fixed amount deductible (solid line) and no deductible (dashed line). STFded02.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 10 Proportional deductible In the case of the proportional deductible of c, where c (0, 1), each payment is reduced by c 100% (the insurer pays 100%(1 c) of the claim). The payment function is given by h P D(c) (x) = (1 c)x. The relation between the premium under the proportional deductible and the premium in the case of no deductible has the following form: P P D(c) = (1 c)ex = (1 c)p. The premium is a decreasing function of c, P P D(0) = P and P P D(1) = 0.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 11 Figure 3: The payment function under the proportional deductible (solid line) and no deductible (dashed line). STFded03.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 12 Limited proportional deductible The proportional deductible is usually combined with a minimum amount deductible so the insurer does not need to handle small claims and with maximum amount deductible to limit the retention of the insured. For the limited proportional deductible of c with minimum amount m 1 and maximum amount m 2 (0 m 1 < m 2 ) the payment function is given by 0, x m 1, x m 1, m 1 < x m 1 /c, h LP D(c,m1,m 2 )(x) = (1 c)x, m 1 /c < x m 2 /c, x m 2, otherwise.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 13 Limited proportional deductible cont. The following formula expresses the premium under the limited proportional deductible in terms of the premium in the case of no deductible and the corresponding limited expected value function { ( P LP D(c,m1,m 2 ) = P E(X, m 1 ) + c E X, m ) ( 1 E X, m )} 2. c c

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 14 Figure 4: The payment function under the limited proportional deductible (solid line) and no deductible (dashed line). STFded04.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 15 Disappearing deductible In the case of disappearing deductible the payment depends on the loss in the following way: if the loss is less than an amount of d 1, the insurer pays nothing, if the loss exceeds d 2 (d 2 > d 1 ) amount, the insurer pays the loss in full, if the loss is between d 1 and d 2, then the deductible is reduced linearly between d 1 and d 2. The payment function is thus given by: h DD(d1,d 2 )(x) = 0, x d 1, d 2 (x d 1 ) d 2 d 1, d 1 < x d 2, x, otherwise.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 16 Disappearing deductible cont. The following formula shows the premium under the disappearing deductible in terms of the premium in the case of no deductible and the corresponding limited expected value function P DD(d1,d 2 ) = P + d 1 d 2 d 1 E(X, d 2 ) d 2 d 2 d 1 E(X, d 1 ).

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 17 Figure 5: The payment function under the disappearing deductible (solid line) and no deductible (dashed line). STFded05.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 18 Lognormal distribution of loss Consider a random variable Z which has the normal distribution. Let X = e Z. Then the distribution of X is called a lognormal distribution. The distribution function is given by ( ) { ln t µ t 1 F (t) = Φ = exp 1 ( ) } 2 ln y µ dy, σ 2πσy 2 σ 0 where t, σ > 0, µ R and Φ(.) is the standard normal distribution function. We will illustrate the formulae for premium under deductibles using the catastrophe data example. As the example we consider the lognormal loss distribution with parameters µ = 18.4406 and σ = 1.1348.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 19 Figure 6: The premium under the franchise deductible (thick line) and fixed amount deductible (thin line). STFded06.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 20 Figure 7: The thick solid line - the premium for c = 0.2 and m 1 = 10 million, the solid - for c = 0.4 and m 1 = 10 million, the dotted - for c = 0.2 and m 1 = 50 million, and the dashed - for c = 0.4 and m 1 = 50 million. STFded07.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 21 Figure 8: The thick line represents the premium for d 1 = USD 10 million and the thin line the premium for d 1 = USD 50 million. STFded08.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 22 Pareto distribution of loss The Pareto distribution is defined by the formula: F (t) = 1 ( λ λ + t ) α, where t, α, λ > 0. The expectation of the Pareto distribution exist only for α > 1. As the example we consider the PCS data. The analysis showed that the catastrophe-linked losses can be well modelled by the Pareto distribution with parameters α = 2.3872 and λ = 3.0320 10 8.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 23 Figure 9: The premium under the franchise deductible (thick line) and fixed amount deductible (thin line). STFded09.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 24 Figure 10: The thick solid line - for c = 0.2 and m 1 = 10 million, the solid - for c = 0.4 and m 1 = 10 million, the dotted - for c = 0.2 and m 1 = 50 million, and the dashed - for c = 0.4 and m 1 = 50 million. STFded10.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 25 Figure 11: The thick line represents the premium for d 1 = USD 10 million and the thin line the premium for d 1 = USD 50 million. STFded11.xpl

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 26 Burr distribution of loss Experience has shown that the Pareto formula is often an appropriate model for the claim size distribution, particularly where exceptionally large claims may occur. However, there is sometimes a need to find heavy tailed distributions which offer greater flexibility than the Pareto law. Such flexibility is provided by the Burr distribution which distribution function is given by F (t) = 1 ( λ λ + t τ ) α, where t, α, λ, τ > 0. Its mean exists only for ατ > 1.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 27 For the Burr distribution with ατ > 1 the following formulae hold: (a) franchise deductible premium P F D(a) = λ 1 τ Γ (α 1/τ) Γ (1 + 1/τ) Γ(α) { 1 B (1 + 1τ, α 1τ, a τ λ + a τ )}, (b) fixed amount deductible premium P F AD(b) = λ 1 τ Γ (α 1/τ) Γ (1 + 1/τ) Γ(α) { 1 B (1 + 1τ, α 1τ, b τ λ + b τ )} b ( λ λ + b τ ) α,

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 28 (c) proportional deductible premium P P D(c) = (1 c) λ 1 τ Γ(α 1/τ)Γ(1 + 1/τ), Γ(α) (d) limited proportional deductible premium { P LP D(c,m1,m 2 ) = λ 1 τ Γ (α 1/τ) Γ (1 + 1/τ) Γ(α) ( 1 B 1 + 1 τ, α 1 τ, m τ ) 1 λ + m τ + cb (1 + 1τ, α 1τ, (m 1 /c) τ ) 1 λ + (m 1 /c) τ cb (1 + 1τ, α 1τ, (m 2 /c) τ ) } λ + (m 2 /c) τ ( ) α ( ) α ( ) α λ λ λ m 1 λ + m τ + m 1 1 λ + (m 1 /c) τ m 2 λ + (m 2 /c) τ,

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 29 (e) disappearing deductible premium P DD(d1,d 2 ) = λ 1 τ Γ (α 1/τ) Γ (1 + 1/τ) Γ(α) { } d 2 d 1 + d 1 B 1 + 1/τ, α 1/τ, d τ 2/(λ + d τ 2) d 2 d 1 { } d 2 B 1 + 1/τ, α 1/τ, d τ 1/(λ + d τ 1) d 2 d 1 + λ 1 τ Γ (α 1/τ) Γ (1 + 1/τ) Γ(α) d 2 d 1 d 2 d 1 {( λ λ + d τ 2 ) α ( λ λ + d τ 1 ) α }, where the functions Γ( ) and B(,, ) are defined as: Γ(a) = y a 1 e y dy and B(a, b, x) = Γ(a+b) x 0 Γ(a)Γ(b) 0 ya 1 (1 y) b 1 dy.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 30 Weibull distribution of loss Another frequently used analytic claim size distribution is the Weibull distribution which is defined by { ( ) α } t F (t) = 1 exp, β where t, α, β > 0. For the Weibull distribution the following formulae hold: (a) franchise deductible premium ( P F D(a) = βγ 1 + 1 α ) [ 1 Γ { 1 + 1 ( ) α }] a α,, β (b) fixed amount deductible premium ( P F AD(b) = βγ 1 + 1 ) [ { 1 Γ 1 + 1 ( ) α }] b α α, β b exp { ( ) α } b, β

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 31 (c) proportional deductible premium P P D(c) = (1 c)βγ ( 1 + 1 ), α (d) limited proportional deductible premium ( P LP D(c,m1,m 2 ) = βγ 1 + 1 ) [ 1 Γ α + βγ ( 1 + 1 ) [ { c Γ 1 + 1 ( α α, m1 cβ m 1 exp { ( ) α } m1 β + m 1 exp { 1 + 1 ( α, m1 β ) α } Γ { ( ) α } m1 cβ ) α }] { 1 + 1 ( α, m2 β m 2 exp ) α }] { ( ) α } m2, cβ

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 32 (e) disappearing deductible premium )[ P DD(d1,d 2 ) = βγ ( 1 + 1 α d 2 d 1 d 2 Γ d 2 d 1 + d 1 Γ { 1 + 1 ( ) α } ] α, d1 + d 1d 2 cβ d 2 d 1 where the function Γ(, ) is defined as { 1 + 1 ( ) α } α, d2 β [ { ( ) α } d2 exp β exp { ( ) α }] d1, β Γ(a, x) = 1 Γ(a) x 0 y a 1 e y dy.

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 33 Gamma distribution of loss The gamma distribution given by F (t) = F (t, α, β) = t 0 1 Γ(α)β α yα 1 e y β dy, for t, α, β > 0 does not have these drawbacks. For the gamma distribution following formulae hold: (a) franchise deductible premium P F D(a) = αβ {1 F (a, α + 1, β)}, (b) fixed amount deductible premium P F AD(b) = αβ {1 F (b, α + 1, β)} b {1 F (b, α, β)},

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 34 (c) proportional deductible premium P P D(c) = (1 c)αβ, (d) limited proportional deductible premium + cαβ P LP D(c,m1,m 2 ) = αβ {1 F (m 1, α + 1, β} { F F ( m1 c, α + 1, β ) + m 1 {F (m 1, α, β) F ( m2 c, α + 1, β )} ( m1 c, α, β )} m 2 {1 F ( m2 c, α, β )},

Pure risk premiums under deductibles 35 (e) disappearing deductible premium P DD(d1,d 2 ) = αβ d 2 d 1 [ d2 {1 F (d 1, α + 1, β)} d 1 {1 F (d 2, α + 1, β)} ] + d 1d 2 d 2 d 1 {F (d 1, α, β) F (d 2, α, β)}.