Business Opportunities workshop for consultants



Similar documents
Tim Schneller, P.E. GBA Engineers and Architects

Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis Screening of Final Alternatives

SPU - DRAINAGE AND WASTEWATER

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Request for Proposals PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR DRINKING WATER, WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER PROJECTS OPEN-END CONTRACTS

Sanitation District No. 1 of Northern Kentucky. SD1's Sanitary and Storm Water Asset Management Program. KSPE Annual Convention

BEFORE THE PHILADELPHIA WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE BOARD DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEPHEN J. FURTEK

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG-TERM CONTROL PLAN Executive Summary

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Department Business Plan. Utilities

DRAFT Public Outreach Document for What s an SSMP?

DELAWARE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PREQUALIFICATION AND QUALIFICATIONS-BASED SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES

Sanitary Sewer Overflows Response to EPA Rule Making

City of Dallas Wastewater Collection System: TCEQ Sanitary Sewer Outreach Agreement City Council Briefing January 17, 2007

August 21, Dear Valued Colleague and Stakeholder:

WERF STRATEGIC ASSET MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District STRATEGIC PLAN

City and County of San Francisco 2030 Sewer System Master Plan TASK 400 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 405

Omaha Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Program

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

Seattle Public Utilities Prioritized Performance Plan

The Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact?

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE TOWN CENTER SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WITHIN THE TOWN OF WOODSIDE

Department Business Plan. Utilities

Combined Sewer Overflow Control

ELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. Internal Audit Report. Prepared by: Audit and Assurance Services Branch.

CASE STUDY. City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program. City of Grand Rapids. By the Numbers

Sewer System Improvement Program Update

PNWS-AWWA PRESENTATION May 9, 2013 Spokane, Washington. Water Operations Stormwater Best Management Practices

M E M O R A N D U M. Among the standard conditions contained in the NPDES permit is also a Duty to

Financial Services FINANCIAL SERVICES UTILITIES 57 FINANCIAL SERVICES AND UTILITIES BUSINESS PLAN. CR_2215 Attachment 1

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Element 3: OVERFLOW EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

City of Bakersfield Public Works Department Sewer System Management Plan December 2014

Update on the Metro Nashville Consent Decree Program. Scott Potter Ron Taylor

Engineering RFP Addendum No. 1

IMAGINE REGINA ACCELERATING EXCELLENCE. City of Regina Corporate Strategic Plan

Engineering Major Service Actual Budget Projected Request Executive Adopted

Implementing Green Infrastructure in Atlanta

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

How To Get A Plan For A Water Treatment Plant

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Jeff Haby, P.E. Director Sewer System Improvements. September 15, Agenda

Click to edit Master title style

Executive Summary Consent Decree

Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Plan Working Committee SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW RESPONSE PLAN

5. Environmental Analysis

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

How to do a Comprehensive Plan Part 1-1. Purdue Land Use Team Christine E. Nolan, Chair

AGENCY SUMMARY NARRATIVE

Request for Qualifications for Program Management Support Services for The Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport Terminal Improvement Program

ENTERPRISE FUNDS. Water and Sewer Fund WALTER BUZZ PISHKUR, DIRECTOR. Goals and Objectives

Summary: Introduction

SAWS SSO Reduction Program

Stormwater harvesting

CONSIDERING GC/CM There are some benefits and risks to using GC/CM. Departments should consider these carefully.

City of Richmond Department of Public Utilities

North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan

Toronto s Wet Weather Flow Master Plan

Unauthorized Discharges and Sanitary Sewer Overflows

CITY OF GRANTS PASS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

City of Atlanta. Department of Watershed Management. Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance Summary of Revisions

Clear Water Projects in Cooksville Creek Watershed

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Consideration of a revised approach and timetable for the education quality assurance contract procurement.

Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services Director, Purchasing & Materials Management Division

Transcription:

Business Opportunities workshop for consultants Michael Davis, Division Director Human Resource and Service Equity Branch Environmental Justice and Service Equity Master of Ceremonies

Welcome Linda De Boldt, Deputy Director Project Delivery Branch

Strategic Business Plan Terry Martin, Manager Director s Office Strategic Asset Management & Technical Services

What Is SPU s Strategic Business Plan? Big Picture: The SBP will be the primary tool to set a six-year rate path for each of SPU s 4 lines of business. It will include recommendations on: o o o Potential efficiencies in existing services Lower-priority existing services that may be reduced Prioritized new investment to respond to future needs. This will be the basis for future budgets & rate proposals.

What Is SPU s Strategic Business Plan? (Continued) Some More Detail. Five Major Task Areas: o o o o o Define strategic direction Define baseline, or status quo, rate path Identify potential reductions to/efficiencies in baseline Identify potential additions to baseline Develop recommended and alternative rate paths for 4 lines of business

Why is SPU Doing a Strategic Business Plan? The primary goal for the Strategic Business Plan is to set a transparent and integrated direction for all of SPU s lines of business that: o reflects customer values o provides rate predictability for utility customers o results in best value for customer dollars

How Will SPU Accomplish This Work? The SPU Team Steering Committee - Nancy Ahern, Martin Baker, Melina Thung Core Members - Diane Clausen, Keith Hinman, Terry Martin, Karen Reed Subject Matter Experts - Executive Team, Leadership Team, Service Equity representative, etc.

How Will SPU Accomplish This Work? The Resources We Will Use Oversight Customer Review Panel Mayor/Council Customer Outreach Employee Outreach SPU Team Consultant Support Outreach Facilitation Prioritization Benchmarking / Workplace Efficiency

Benchmarking /Workplace Efficiency Track Phasing Phase 1A Benchmarking (4-6 months) Phase 1B - Implementation Plan (4-6 months) Phase 2 - Implementation Assistance (3-4 years)

Benchmarking /Workplace Efficiency Track RFP Schedule Request for Proposals (RFP) - March 8th? Short-Listed Firms Announced Early April RFP Interviews Mid to Late April Anticipated Contract Execution Mid May

Drainage & Wastewater Projects Andrew Lee, Manager Utility Systems Management Branch Capital Portfolio Management

Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Reduction Program Consultant Services 2013 Projects (Phased Engineering Services Contract) 14 th Ave S and S Concord (Design in 2013) Pearl St SSO Reduction (Options Analysis in 2013) 2014 Projects (Phased Engineering Services Contract) Holman Road (Options Analysis in 2014) Lake City Way (Options Analysis in 2014) Harvard & Roy (Options Analysis in 2014)

Combined Sewer Overflow (SSO) Reduction Program Next set of projects (2015-2025) will be defined by the Long- Term Control Plan (LTCP) and the Integrated Plan (IP) LTCP will: identify areas where CSO reduction projects are needed Evaluate CSO reduction alternatives Select a preferred solution for each affected area Recommend a project schedule Estimate program costs and rate impacts Consider public and stakeholder input IP will identify stormwater projects with greater benefit to receiving waters 13

CSO LTCP Alternatives Alternative 1: Neighborhood Solution Alternative 2: Shared Storage Solution Alternative 3: Shared Tunnel Solution 14

Other DWW Capital Programs Localized Flooding Program Culvert Replacement Program Creek/Habitat Improvement Program Water Quality Projects

CSO Planning, Design & Construction Ben Marre, Program Manager Utility Systems Management Branch Capital Portfolio Management ben.marre@seattle.gov, - 206-684-7597

Phased Engineering Consultant Services For CSO Planning, Design and Construction in 5 CSO Areas Duwamish (NPDES 111) Madison Park (NPDES 24 and 25) Montlake (NPDES 139 and 140) Magnolia (NPDES 60) Henderson (NPDES 49)

Project Update: Delridge CSO Integrated Team with Meaningful Work for WMBEs Proposal Approach Includes Mitigation of Impacts on Neighborhood (i.e., Landscape, Construction) WMBE Inclusion Goal = 22% Phase 1 Completed -- WMBE Spend = 28% Innovative Approach Resulting in Proposed Cost Savings Over $90 Million 18

Major Facility Projects Fred Aigbe, Manager Project Delivery Branch Project Management and Engineering Division 19

Project Updates North Transfer Station Project South Transfer Station, Phase 2 Cedar Falls Facility Project. 20

Cedar River Watershed Facilities Development Project

Cedar Falls current status Building Complex Administrative Headquarters Buildings designed for Offices and Operations (crew quarters, shops, materials, equipment) Historic Houses repurposed to hold offices Temporary Modular Buildings house offices, equipment and materials Buildings no longer in use 22

CMOM Implementation Phase 2 Frank McDonald, Manager Field Operations and Maintenance Branch Planning and Systems Support Division

CMOM = Capacity Management Operation & Maintenance 6-Year Roadmap

CMOM Initiative Examples Decision Making Algorithyms Begin Cleaning Algorithm Is there a cleaning frequency? No Severity = Heavy Or Medium? Yes Pipe has previous cleaning history? No Begin CCTV Algorithm logic Yes No Yes Is there a cleaning record after CCTV record Yes Severity = Heavy Or Medium? No Severity = None? No Span = Number of months since last cleaned Set NewFreq = Default Cleaning Frequency No Yes Yes Span <= 1 month? Yes Max Maintenance Finding > = ER threshhold No Max Maintenance Finding > = PR threshhold No Yes Yes Potential increase in frequency Potential decrease in frequency No Set X = to ER days Set X = to PR days Is record date within window or early? No Is record date within window or late Use span to select frequency based on the lead lag window for each frequency. For example, if span is 11 months, 12 month frequency is selected. If span is 7 months, 6 months is selected. Set NewFreq = 1 Month Is ER Freq Add > 0? No Is there a cleaning schedule? Is there a cleaning schedule? No Is PR Freq Add > 0? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Valid Invalid Count consecutive similar findings within selected frequency. Set Y = ER Freq Add Set Proposed Clean Date = CCTV Date + X Set Y = PR Freq Add Count consecutive similar findings Does count of findings meet freq change rule? Set Proposed Clean Date = CCTV Date + X Proposed Clean Date < Next Clean Date No Set Proposed Clean Date = CCTV Date + X No Yes Yes Does count of findings meet freq change rule? No No Recommendation Create Rec to : 1. Add a Cleaning Schedule with a Freq = Y 2. Next Clean Date = Proposed Clean Date Create Rec to Set Next Clean Date = Proposed Clean Date Create Rec to : 1. Add a Cleaning Schedule with a Freq = Y 2. Next Clean Date = Proposed Clean Date Yes Create Rec to: 1. Modify freq per freq change rules 2. Set Next Clean Date = Current Next Clean Date + New Freq Old Freq End Cleaning Algorithm Create Rec to: 1. Add cleaning schedule with Freq = NewFreq 2. Set Next Clean Date = Clean Date + New Freq No Recommendation End CCTV Algorithm logic 25

26 Work Order Scheduling Improvements Using Maximo, AVL, and GIS

CADD Standards Tim Reese, Supervisor Project Delivery Branch Project Support Division

SPU CADD Standards Project Support Division Land Survey Team: Gary Gervelis Technical Resources Team: Design & Record Drafting CADD Support Resources Engineering Records Center: Dean Huber, Josh Jones & Tim Reese

SPU CADD Standards On-line Documentation and CADD Support Files www.seattle.gov/util/engineering

SPU CADD Standards On-line Documentation & CADD Support Files www.seattle.gov/util/engineering/cad_resources

CADD Drawing Requirements Autodesk AutoCAD or AutoCAD Civil 3D 2012 format. Drawings must comply with SPU/SDOT CADD and presentation standards, available online. Coordination, review and compliance with CADD standards is consultant responsibility. CADD and PDF files must be submitted for electronic review at 30%, 60%, 90% design completion. Final CADD files, PDF s and Civil 3D data submitted at time of advertisement. 31

Construction Recycling and Waste Program Gabriella Uhlar-Heffner Utility Systems Management Branch Solid Waste Division

Community Advisory Committees Sheryl Shapiro, Program Manager Utility Systems Management Policy, Planning and Regulatory

Community Advisory Committees Creeks, Drainage and Wastewater addresses topics such as: stormwater management, water quality, pollution prevention, creeks, wastewater systems Solid Waste addresses topics such as: waste management systems policy: recycling, food/yard waste, collection contracts, transfer stations, garbage systems, waste prevention) Water Systems addresses topics such as: drinking water system, water conservation, supply/demand, Cedar and Tolt Watersheds management (sources of our drinking water)

Purpose of Advisory Committees Make sure programs and services are serving all Seattle communities. Provide your opinion and analysis for the business. Review and help shape SPU s programs, policies and services. Learn more about your water, sewer, drainage and solid waste systems.

Committee Membership Applications accepted on a rolling basis. Commitment: Monthly meetings; two year term, with option to reapply for a final term, each with approval by the SPU Director. For more information please contact: Sheryl Shapiro, Program Manager (206) 615-1443 sheryl.shapiro@seattle.gov. Teresa Rayburn, Program Support Staff (206) 684-4622 teresa.rayburn@seattle.gov For an application, current work items and meeting notes, visit www.seattle.gov/util/cac

Consultant Contracts with SPU Steve Johnson, Manager Finance and Administration Branch Finance Division, Grants & Contracts

Advertisement Daily Journal of Commerce Ebid ebidexchange.com The Consultant Connection Pre-submittal Meeting Description of the project provided. Q&A for project & contracting process. Prime/sub-consultant networking. 38

Selection Process Proposals Received Scored based on published criteria. Apparent successful Proposer selected. Contract negotiations begin. 39

Contracting Requirements Insurance City of Seattle Business License State UBI Number Federal Tax ID Number Equal Benefits (EB) Inclusion Plan 40

Business Tools Consultant Roster Business Registration (VCR) Consultant Opportunities (RSS Feed) 41

WMBE Business Outreach Vicky Schiantarelli, Strategic Advisor Human Resource and Service Equity Branch Environmental Justice and Service Equity

SPU Priorities and Goals Treat all customers fairly and equitably by working closely with - community business partners, - community members, and - other City stakeholders. Ensure equitable inclusion of WMBE business participation in contracting processes and contracts. Honor City s commitments as described in: - SMC CH. 20.42 - Mayor s Executive Order 2010-05 - Race & Social Justice Initiative

WMBE Goals & Spend (Consultant) SPU Department Goals 2013 Prime Consultant Aspirational Goal = 12% 2012 SPU Spend = $26,475,791.98 2012 WMBE Spend = $2,098,217.42 (7.93%) NEW Subconsultant Aspirational Goal = 16.5%

WMBE Goals & Spend (Consultant) 2012 Consultant Contracts (over $260,000) $21,520,638.84 - Total Spend $996,475.64 4.63% WMBE Spend 2012 Consultant Rosters (under $260,000) $4,955,153.14 Total Spend $1,101,741.78 22.23% WMBE Spend Note: Does not include sub-consultant spend