CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND CONCURRENT DISCUSSIONS



Similar documents
Is it statistically significant? The chi-square test

Chapter 23. Two Categorical Variables: The Chi-Square Test

Class 19: Two Way Tables, Conditional Distributions, Chi-Square (Text: Sections 2.5; 9.1)

Mind on Statistics. Chapter 15

Recommend Continued CPS Monitoring. 63 (a) 17 (b) 10 (c) (d) 20 (e) 25 (f) 80. Totals/Marginal

Having a coin come up heads or tails is a variable on a nominal scale. Heads is a different category from tails.

The Chi-Square Test. STAT E-50 Introduction to Statistics

Calculating P-Values. Parkland College. Isela Guerra Parkland College. Recommended Citation

Comparing Multiple Proportions, Test of Independence and Goodness of Fit

Simulating Chi-Square Test Using Excel

Unit 31 A Hypothesis Test about Correlation and Slope in a Simple Linear Regression

Stats Review Chapters 9-10


Data Mining Techniques Chapter 5: The Lure of Statistics: Data Mining Using Familiar Tools

Bivariate Statistics Session 2: Measuring Associations Chi-Square Test

Elementary Statistics

Math 58. Rumbos Fall Solutions to Review Problems for Exam 2

HYPOTHESIS TESTING (ONE SAMPLE) - CHAPTER 7 1. used confidence intervals to answer questions such as...

General Method: Difference of Means. 3. Calculate df: either Welch-Satterthwaite formula or simpler df = min(n 1, n 2 ) 1.

Chi Squared and Fisher's Exact Tests. Observed vs Expected Distributions

TABLE OF CONTENTS. About Chi Squares What is a CHI SQUARE? Chi Squares Hypothesis Testing with Chi Squares... 2

Online 12 - Sections 9.1 and 9.2-Doug Ensley

Final Exam Practice Problem Answers

3.4 Statistical inference for 2 populations based on two samples

Chapter VIII Customers Perception Regarding Health Insurance

Simple Linear Regression Inference

November 08, S8.6_3 Testing a Claim About a Standard Deviation or Variance

Testing Research and Statistical Hypotheses

Association Between Variables

BA 275 Review Problems - Week 5 (10/23/06-10/27/06) CD Lessons: 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 Textbook: pp

Testing Hypotheses About Proportions

A STUDY ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS ONLINE SHOPPING IN COIMBATORE DISTRICT

Statistical Impact of Slip Simulator Training at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Section 12 Part 2. Chi-square test

HYPOTHESIS TESTING (ONE SAMPLE) - CHAPTER 7 1. used confidence intervals to answer questions such as...

LAB : THE CHI-SQUARE TEST. Probability, Random Chance, and Genetics

Chi Square Distribution

Contingency Tables and the Chi Square Statistic. Interpreting Computer Printouts and Constructing Tables

Mind on Statistics. Chapter 13

Chi Square Tests. Chapter Introduction

Chi-square test Fisher s Exact test

An Introduction to Statistics Course (ECOE 1302) Spring Semester 2011 Chapter 10- TWO-SAMPLE TESTS

CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE AND F DISTRIBUTIONS

Statistics I for QBIC. Contents and Objectives. Chapters 1 7. Revised: August 2013

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

11. Analysis of Case-control Studies Logistic Regression

Section 7.1. Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Schrodinger s cat quantum mechanics thought experiment (1935)

Topic 8. Chi Square Tests

UNDERSTANDING THE TWO-WAY ANOVA

Name: Date: Use the following to answer questions 3-4:

One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Example Problem

Using Stata for Categorical Data Analysis

Review #2. Statistics

Difference of Means and ANOVA Problems

Revised KYC Text File Structure 2.0

Independent t- Test (Comparing Two Means)

Regression Analysis: A Complete Example

C. The null hypothesis is not rejected when the alternative hypothesis is true. A. population parameters.

Using Excel in Research. Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence

Two-Sample T-Tests Assuming Equal Variance (Enter Means)

Odds ratio, Odds ratio test for independence, chi-squared statistic.

Policyholder s Satisfaction of Private Life Insurance Companies With Reference To Tirupur District, Tamilnadu

Statistics 2014 Scoring Guidelines

Examining Differences (Comparing Groups) using SPSS Inferential statistics (Part I) Dwayne Devonish

Two-Sample T-Tests Allowing Unequal Variance (Enter Difference)

Adverse Impact Ratio for Females (0/ 1) = 0 (5/ 17) = Adverse impact as defined by the 4/5ths rule was not found in the above data.

MONT 107N Understanding Randomness Solutions For Final Examination May 11, 2010

Chapter 7: Simple linear regression Learning Objectives

CHAPTER 13 SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION. Opening Example. Simple Regression. Linear Regression

Elementary Statistics Sample Exam #3

CHAPTER 12. Chi-Square Tests and Nonparametric Tests LEARNING OBJECTIVES. USING T.C. Resort Properties

IB Practice Chi Squared Test of Independence

Introduction. Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing. Significance Testing

A POPULATION MEAN, CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING

A Study on Effectiveness of Training in Indian Banks

Section 13, Part 1 ANOVA. Analysis Of Variance

Generalized Linear Models

AP: LAB 8: THE CHI-SQUARE TEST. Probability, Random Chance, and Genetics

Asian Research Journal of Business Management

COMPARISONS OF CUSTOMER LOYALTY: PUBLIC & PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES.

" Y. Notation and Equations for Regression Lecture 11/4. Notation:

CONTINGENCY TABLES ARE NOT ALL THE SAME David C. Howell University of Vermont

Two-Group Hypothesis Tests: Excel 2013 T-TEST Command

University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Business 41000: Business Statistics Solution Key

Distribution is a χ 2 value on the χ 2 axis that is the vertical boundary separating the area in one tail of the graph from the remaining area.

MULTIPLE REGRESSION EXAMPLE

Chapter 8 Section 1. Homework A

Statistics in Medicine Research Lecture Series CSMC Fall 2014

BA 275 Review Problems - Week 6 (10/30/06-11/3/06) CD Lessons: 53, 54, 55, 56 Textbook: pp , ,

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Limitations of the t-test

Whitney Colbert Research Methods for the Social Sciences Trinity College Spring 2012

CONTENTS OF DAY 2. II. Why Random Sampling is Important 9 A myth, an urban legend, and the real reason NOTES FOR SUMMER STATISTICS INSTITUTE COURSE

Categorical Data Analysis

PERCEPTION OF SENIOR CITIZEN RESPONDENTS AS TO REVERSE MORTGAGE SCHEME

Nonparametric Statistics

Solutions to Homework 10 Statistics 302 Professor Larget

CHAPTER 5 COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TYPE OF ONLINE ADVERTSIEMENTS. Table: 8 Perceived Usefulness of Different Advertisement Types

Evaluation of Total Quality Management (TQM) Application in the Nigerian Telecommunication Industry: A Case study of Imo NITEL Owerri

Testing differences in proportions

UNDERSTANDING THE INDEPENDENT-SAMPLES t TEST

Transcription:

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND CONCURRENT DISCUSSIONS Hypothesis 1: People are resistant to the technological change in the security system of the organization. Hypothesis 2: information hacked and misused. Lack of proper security system results in organizationally important Hypothesis 3: A proper security system in any organization increases data security and in turn efficiency and productivity of the organization. Hypothesis 4: Proper identification system reduces absenteeism 134

Types of Data: The random variables are of two types and two types of data are generated out of them: a) numerical and b) categorical A chi square (X 2 ) statistic is used in order to study whether the categorical variables differ from one another or not. The categorical variable generates data in the categories and numerical variable generates data in numerical form. For example, if it is asked - "What is your specialization?" or Do you own a bike?" are categorical type as they give data such as "computers" or "yes.", whereas questions like "What marks did you get?" or "What is your age?" are numerical type. It is very clear that the numerical data is basically of two types: 1) continuous, 2) discrete. To understand the differences between the types of numerical variables. Data Type Question Type Possible Responses Categorical What is your marital status? Married or unmarried Numerical(Discrete) Number of bikes that you 2 or 3 own? Numerical(Continuous) What s your height? 5 11 135

- the Chi Square statistic compares the tallies or counts of categorical responses between two (or more) independent groups. - the Chi square tests are used only on actual numbers and not on percentages, proportions, or means. For example, A case of a medicine trial conducted on different animals. The hypothesis in this case was set that the animals consuming the drug shows increase in the heartbeat as compared to animals who did not consume the medicine. On conducting the study, researcher collected the following data: H0: The proportion of animals whose heartbeat increased is independent of medicine consumption.. H1: The proportion of animals whose heartbeat increased is associated with medicine treatment. Heartbeat Increased No Heartbeat Increase Total Treated 56 24 80 Not treated 50 35 85 Total 106 59 165 136

Applying the formula above we get: Chi square = 165[(56)(35) - (24)(50)] 2 / (80)(85)(59)(106) = 2.818 The degree of freedom is very important before proceeding ahead. When a comparison is made between one sample and another, the degrees of freedom= (number of columns minus one) x (number of rows minus one) Thus, degree of freedom = (2-1) x (2-1) = 1. Now, the chi square statistic (x 2 = 2.818), alpha level of significance (0.05), and degrees of freedom (df = 1). From the data collected the Chi square distribution table has 1 degree of freedom and the value of x 2 (2.818) lies between 2.706 and 3.841. Thus we can see that the corresponding probability is between the 0.10 and 0.05 probability levels which means the p-value is above 0.05. As the p-value> conventionally accepted significance level of 0.05 this proves that we accept the null hypothesis. Now if the new x 2 value is 4.125 and this value exceeds the table value of 3.841 (at 1 degree of freedom and an alpha level of 0.05). This means that p is less than the 0.05, so the alternative hypothesis is accepted. 137

Table 3. Chi Square distribution table. probability level (alpha) 138

4.1 Hypothesis 1: People are resistant to technological change in the security system of the organization. H 0 : Technological change in the security system and people s resistance are independent. H1 : Technological change in the security system and people s resistance are dependent. 22. Table showing readiness for change Table 4.1 : Table showing readiness for change S.No. Content Number of Respondents % of Respondents 1 Yes 178 71.2 2 No 72 28.8 250 100 The above table shows the view of the respondents for readiness for change. The total responses taken are 250 out of which 175 respondents are male and 75 respondents are female. 139

Consider the table below: Table 4.1.1 : Table showing opinion of males and females for Table 4.1 Opinion Row Total Yes No Male 125 50 175 Female 53 22 75 Column Total 178 72 250 Table 4.1.2 : Table for Chi Square calculation for Table 4.1.1 Groups OF EF OIJ-EIJ (OIJ-EIJ) 2 /EIJ Male Yes 125 124.6-0.4 0.00128 No 50 50.4 0.4 0.00317 Female Yes 53 53.4 0.4 0.00300 No 22 21.6-0.4 0.00741 140

X 2 = (OIJ-EIJ)2/EI X 2 = 0.01486 Degree of freedom = (Column-1) X (Row-1) = (2-1) X (2-1) = 1 Significant level = 5% Table value for X 2 for 1 degree of freedom at 5% significance level = 3.841 Conclusion: Calculated value of Chi Square [0.01486] is less than the table value [3.841]. So we accept the null hypothesis and conclude that technological change in the security system of the organization and people resistance towards change are independent. That is people are not resistance to the technological change in the security system of the organization. 141

4.2 Hypothesis 2: Lack of proper security system results in organizationally important information hacked and misused. H0: Security system and information hacking are independent H1: Security system and information hacking are dependent 18. Table showing views of the employees on use of a proper security system to save the data from getting hacked or misused if you feel data is not secured in a proper way. Table 4.2 : Table showing views of the employees on use of a proper security system to save the data from getting hacked or misused if you feel data is not secured in a proper way. S.No. Content Number of Respondents % of Respondents 1 Agree 90 60 2 Indifferent 23 15 3 Disagree 37 25 150 100 142

Table 4.2.1 : Table showing opinion of males and females for Table 4.2 Opinion Row Total Agree Indifferent Disagree Male 67 18 20 105 Female 23 5 17 45 Column Total 90 23 37 150 Table 4.2.2 : Table for Chi Square calculation for Table 4.2.1 Groups OF EF OIJ-EIJ (OIJ-EIJ) 2 /EIJ Male Agree 67 63 4 0.25397 Indifferent 18 16 2 0.25000 Disagree 20 26-6 1.38462 Female Agree 23 27-4 0.59259 Indifferent 5 7-2 0.57143 Disagree 17 11 6 3.27273 143

X 2 = (OIJ-EIJ) 2 / EI X 2 = 6.32534 Degree of freedom = (Column-1) X (Row-1) = (3-1) X (2-1) = 2 Significant level = 5% Table value for X 2 for 1 degree of freedom at 5% significance level = 5.991 Conclusion: Calculated value of Chi Square [6.32534] is greater than the table value [5.991]. So we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that security system and information hacking are dependent. I.e. if the security system is very strong information hacking is not possible. If there is a flaw in the security system the information can be easily hacked and it can be misused against the organization. 144

4.3 Hypothesis 3: A proper security system in any organization increases data security and in turn efficiency and productivity of the organization. H0: Proper identification system and data security are independent H1: Proper identification system and data security are dependent 19. Table showing employees views about the proper security system in the organization increases data security and in turn efficiency and productivity of the organizatoion. Table 4.3 : Table showing employees views about the proper security system in the organization increases data security and in turn efficiency and productivity of the organizatoion. S.No. Content Number of Respondents % of Respondents 1 Agree 178 71.2 2 Indifferent 30 12 3 Disagree 42 16.8 250 100 145

Table 4.3.1 : Table showing opinion of males and females for Table 4.3 Opinion Row Total Agree Indifferent Disagree Male 132 22 21 175 Female 46 8 21 75 Column Total 178 30 42 250 Table 4.3.2 : Table for Chi Square calculation for Table 4.3.2 Groups OF EF OIJ-EIJ (OIJ-EIJ) 2 /EIJ Male Agree 132 124.6-7.4 0.43940 Indifferent 22 21-1 0.04760 Disagree 21 29 8 2.22000 Female Agree 46 53.4 7.4 1.02540 Indifferent 8 9 1 0.11110 Disagree 21 12.6-8.4 5.60000 Total 9.44350 146

X 2 = (OIJ-EIJ) 2 / EI X 2 = 9.44350 Degree of freedom = (Column-1) X (Row-1) = (3-1) X (2-1) = 2 Significant level = 5% Table value for X 2 for 1 degree of freedom at 5% significance level = 5.991 Conclusion: Calculated value of Chi Square [9.44350] is greater than the table value [5.991]. So we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that proper security system and data security inturn efficiency and productivity are dependent. That is proper security system increase data security and in-turn productivity and efficiency of the organization and security system. 147

4.4 Hypothesis 4: Proper identification system reduces absenteeism H0: Proper identification system and absenteeism are independent H1: Proper identification system and absenteeism are dependent 9. Table showing views about the proper identification system reduces absenteeism Table 4.4 : Table showing views about the proper identification system reduces absenteeism S.No. Content Number of Respondents % of Respondents 1 Agree 183 86.8 2 Indifferent 17 6 3 Disagree 50 7.2 250 100 148

Table 4.4.1 : Table showing opinion of males and females for Table 4.4 Opinion Row Total Agree Indifferent Disagree Male 125 12 38 175 Female 58 5 12 75 Column Total 183 17 50 250 Table 4.4.2 : Table for Chi Square calculation for Table 4.4.1 Groups OF EF OIJ-EIJ (OIJ-EIJ) 2 /EIJ Male Agree 125 128.1-3.1 0.075 Indifferent 12 11.9 0.1 0.0008 Disagree 38 35 3 0.2571 Female Agree 58 54.9 3.1 0.175 Indifferent 5 5.1 0.1 0.0019 Disagree 12 15-3 0.6 149

X 2 = (OIJ-EIJ) 2 /EI X 2 = 1.1098 Degree of freedom = (Column-1) X (Row-1) = (3-1) X (2-1) = 2 Significant level = 5% Table value for X 2 for 1 degree of freedom at 5% significance level = 5.991 Conclusion: Calculated value of Chi Square [1.1092] is less than the table value [5.991]. So we accept the null hypothesis and conclude that proper identification system and absenteeism are independent. That is proper identification system does not bring any change in the absenteeism directly. 150