4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Similar documents
BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

URBAN STORMWATER GUIDELINES AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR PROTECTION OF FISH AND FISH HABITAT DRAFT DISCUSSION DOCUMENT

Project Manager. Geoff Masotti, P.Eng. T Ext. 254 T

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Functional Servicing and Preliminary Stormwater Management Report Paris Grand Submission

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Innovative Approaches in Flood Damage Reduction

Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans

Monitoring at Credit Valley Conservation. Presented by Jackie Thomas and Luke Harvey

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Pioneer Park Stormwater Management Rehabilitation Project Town of Richmond Hill Engineering and Public Works Department Design, Construction and

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

BALLANTRAE-MUSSELMAN LAKE SERVICING REPORT. Submitted to: The Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Submitted by:

7.0 Stream Restoration

Post Construction Stormwater Management Checklist Program

HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

Pervious Pavers. By: Rich Lahren. Hebron Brick & Block Supply

Stormwater Management Functional Servicing Report

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Using Green Infrastructure to Manage Combined Sewer Overflows and Flooding

Low Impact Development

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

10/4/ slide sample of Presentation. Key Principles to Current Stormwater Management

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan December 2003

Storm Water Runoff. Managing. A Self-Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Businesses. Storm water runoff is coming. This guide provides businesses

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Jennong-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Curt Kerns, M.S., R.P.Bio., C.F.S. WetlandsPacific Corp

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems.

Engineering Specifications February, 2004 Schedule H to Bylaw 7452, Subdivision Bylaw Page 18

DESIGN OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

LISGAR DISTRICT BASEMENT WATER INFILTRATION INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT. Submitted to: City of Mississauga Mississauga, Ontario


Low Impact Development Checklist

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Designed and produced by geo-graphicsdesign.com DP 300 3/02

Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities

Drainage Analysis for the McKownville Area

Risk and vulnerability assessment of the build environment in a dynamic changing society

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Technical and Engineering Guidelines for Stormwater Management Submissions

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

Carlton Fields Memorandum

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

A. General Information

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Use of Green Roofs to Meet New Development Runoff Requirements. Greg Davis Nov. 8, 2007

Guidelines for. Permeable Pavement

North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

Cooksville Creek Flood Evaluation Master Plan EA Final Report

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Fort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning. Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M.

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (PICP) A Low Impact Development Tool Training for Schools and Universities

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Please click on the tutorial most fitting of your expertise in order to learn about the features of the visualization tool.

Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment: Planning Guidance for Developers

Climate vulnerability assessment Risks from urban flooding Interactive science and policy assessment

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

12-O-1761 A SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE BY CITY UTILITIES COMMITTEE

WATER QUALITY MODELING TO SUPPORT THE ROUGE RIVER RESTORATION

Kitchener s Stormwater Utility

Transcription:

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets 4.1 Environmental Impacts Significant additional development in the Alder Creek watershed is not anticipated at this time; however, there are impacts from increased urbanization that must be considered in this study. Development is anticipated in the Upper Strasburg Creek subwatershed but it is primarily of a residential nature. Increased development results in additional water demand and generates additional wastewater. The increased demand would come from the Region s integrated well supply system in Kitchener and would not directly impact the Mannheim East well field since they are already pumped at capacity. Wastewater is conveyed out of the subwatershed to treatment facilities in Kitchener. Development does generate significant amounts of runoff from hard surfaces (such as roof tops and roadways) if the stormwater management systems are not designed to successfully meet the pre-existing conditions for runoff and infiltration in the watershed. Environmental impacts need to be mitigated to provide adequate protection of ground and surface water and important natural heritage features. Environmental impacts, as a result of increased urbanization, can be anticipated in the following areas: Increased runoff from development areas Increased pollutant loads from residential hard surfaces Increased pollutant loads from other types of developments such as golf courses Increased runoff volumes from hard surfaces (primarily roads and non-residential development) Increased erosion in streams Elevated temperatures in streams Degraded stream water quality Reduced groundwater infiltration affecting water supplies and any groundwater dependent natural heritage features Contamination of water supply from infiltration of urban runoff including pesticides, road salt, nutrients, and industrial contaminants Disruption of the hydrology of natural wetlands Loss of natural heritage features Impairment of natural features function Loss of natural hummocky terrain features Reduced groundwater infiltration affecting water supplies Increased runoff volumes Increased erosion in streams Elevated temperatures in streams Degraded stream water quality 122219T111_W122003002KWO 4-1

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY AND UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN -FINAL REPORT Road salt application Increased chloride contamination of surface waters and groundwater resources Development and rehabilitation of the gravel pits in the watersheds Decrease in the amount of groundwater recharge to water supply wells and the Mannheim ASR Potential changes in quality and quantity of water recharging the underlying aquifer systems of the Waterloo Moraine both during extraction and subsequent rehabilitation Specific to the Alder Creek watershed, there are also potential impacts from stream features such as Alder Lake. Alder Lake is an online pond feature in the watershed that can contribute to watershed impairment through a number of ways, including: Increased water temperatures in the lake and downstream which limits fisheries habitat viability Increase in contaminant loads downstream through the loss of nutrients accumulated in lake sediments Reduction in natural sediment loads to downstream section of the creek by acting as a sediment sink Limiting fish habitat connections by acting as a barrier to fish passage/migration It is the intent of this study to provide criteria, targets, and recommendations to mitigate the environmental impacts noted above. 4.2 Remediation Targets As stated in the introduction to this report, there are a number of objectives of the Alder Creek Watershed Study and the Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Plan Update. Some of these objectives require specific targets that will provide benchmarks for measuring success against goals for the objectives. The potential impacts from urbanization also need to be addressed in these targets. The objectives are to: Provide BMP recommendations that will address groundwater and surface water management from a water quality and water quantity perspective Provide recommendations that will address aquatic systems protection from a water quality and water quantity perspective Provide land use management recommendations that will protect vulnerable groundwater areas and well head protection areas Provide guidance on management of natural heritage components in the watershed Specific to Alder Creek Identify opportunities for improving the water quality in Alder Lake Goals associated with each of these objectives need to be set to identify specific targets for urbanizing areas. This will result in significant environmental protection related to the environmental threats and the measurable success of the implementation strategy. 4-2 122219T111_W122003002KWO

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION TARGETS Goals and targets for each objective are, as follows: 1) Provide BMP recommendations that will address groundwater and surface water management from a water quality and water quantity perspective: Goal is to maintain groundwater infiltration capacities in the watershed that will ensure sustainability of municipal groundwater supply. This applies to the Alder Creek watershed and adjacent Upper Strasburg Creek subwatershed. Target Maintain existing conditions or increase infiltration where it is beneficial to groundwater resources or stream baseflow maintenance. This is supported by the infiltration rate target response units illustrated in Figure 4-1 for the Alder watershed, and more specifically for the Upper Strasburg subwatershed in 4-2 and shown as target rates in Table 4.1 for the Alder watershed and Table 4.2 for the Upper Strasburg subwatershed. Target Maintain the form and function of the gravel pits in the watershed as it relates to maintenance of groundwater infiltration rates and location Goal is to maintain groundwater infiltration rates in the watershed that will ensure maintenance of the groundwater contribution of baseflow volumes in Alder Creek and Upper Strasburg Creek. Target Balanced water budget to maintain existing conditions of storage and infiltration in hummocky terrain or increase infiltration where it is beneficial to groundwater resources or stream baseflow maintenance. This is supported by the infiltration rate targets illustrated in Figure 4-1 for the Alder watershed and more specifically for the Upper Strasburg subwatershed in Figure 4-2 and shown in Table 4.1 for the Alder watershed and Table 4.2 for the Upper Strasburg subwatershed. Target Maintain the function of the hummocky terrain in the watershed as it relates to maintenance of groundwater infiltration rates Goal is to protect groundwater resources from contamination from industrial sources, agricultural sources, urban residential sources including contaminated runoff, chlorides from road salt application and communal wastewater treatment systems, and rural residential sources including private sewage systems. Target Maintain water quality of groundwater resources to current levels or improve where opportunities arise. In urban developing areas, ensure that chloride levels meet the RUC criteria 2) Provide recommendations that will address aquatic systems protection from a water quality and water quantity perspective: Goal is to maintain flow quantities in Alder Creek and tributaries and Upper Strasburg Creek. Target Maintain streamflow rates and frequencies at pre-development (existing) conditions. (It is assumed these targets address erosion thresholds.) Peak flow rates based on the Alder Creek hydrologic model are provided in Table 4.3. Peak unrouted flow rates based on the Upper Strasburg Creek hydrologic model are provided in Table 4.4. These flows are currently modified by the existing culvert as shown in Table 4.4. Target Maintain Alder Creek flood elevations at current levels to protect property from flood risk and maintain wetland habitats. Maintain Upper Strasburg Creek flood elevations below elevation 335 m to protect property from flood risk. 122219T111_W122003002KWO 4-3

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY AND UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN -FINAL REPORT TABLE 4.1 ALDER CREEK WATERSHED FINAL CALIBRATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND RECHARGE VALUES FOR RUS (LAYER 1) RU Hummocky/Nonhummocky Material/Description K (m/sec) Recharge (mm/year) 1 Non-hummocky Impervious and water bodies 5.0E-08 6.0 1 Hummocky Impervious and water bodies 5.0E-08 6.0 2 Non-hummocky Wetland 5.5E-08 23.0 2 Hummocky Wetland 5.5E-08 22.1 3 Non-hummocky Clay till (low vegetation) 1.0E-06 21.7 3 Hummocky Clay till (low vegetation) 1.0E-06 27.1 4 Non-hummocky Clay till (medium vegetation) 1.0E-06 28.7 4 Hummocky Clay till (medium vegetation) 1.0E-06 49.9 5 Non-hummocky Clay till (high vegetation) 1.8E-06 56.1 5 Hummocky Clay till (high vegetation) 1.8E-06 119.4 6 Non-hummocky Silt till (low) 4.2E-06 44.2 6 Hummocky Silt till (low) 4.2E-06 98.6 8 Non-hummocky Silt till (high) 4.2E-06 130.8 8 Hummocky Silt till (high) 4.2E-06 182.2 9 Non-hummocky Sand till (low) 5.0E-06 81.0 12 Non-hummocky Sand and gravel (low) 3.7E-05 282.7 12 Hummocky Sand and gravel (low) 3.7E-05 356.3 13 Non-hummocky Sand and gravel (medium) 3.7E-05 333.3 13 Hummocky Sand and gravel (medium) 3.7E-05 346.0 14 Non-hummocky Sand and gravel (high) 5.0E-05 336.9 14 Hummocky Sand and gravel (high) 5.0E-05 421.6 4-4 122219T111_W122003002KWO

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY Figure 4-1 Recharge Distribution and Response Units 122219_W122003002KWO

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY AND UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN -FINAL REPORT This page intentionally left blank. 4-6 122219T111_W122003002KWO

UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN UPDATE PROJECT NO. 122219 Figure 4-2 Upper Strasburg Recharge Distribution and Gawser Response Units 122219_W122003002KWO

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY AND UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN -FINAL REPORT TABLE 4.2 AVERAGE RECHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR UPPER STRASBURG/ALDER CREEK AREAS BASED ON MODFLOW MODEL OUTPUT Recharge Rate (mm/yr) Recharge Area (km 2 ) Recharge (m 3 )/yr AREA 1 27.1 0.500 13550.559 356.3 0.350 124776.869 119.4 0.067 8049.770 421.6 0.195 82375.932 6.0 0.017 104.873 346.0 0.044 15335.214 948.7 0.066 62775.498 Total 1.241 306968.716 Total Avg. Recharge Rate (mm/yr) 247.4 AREA 2 421.6 0.867284229 365647.031 356.3 0.267593588 95343.595 182.2 0.01405026 2559.957 98.6 0.09132669 9004.812 3688.3 0.001915945 7066.578 28.7 0.002554593 73.317 27.1 0.016604853 449.992 336.9 0.000638648 215.161 6 0.003831889 22.991 282.7 0.040234835 11374.388 1157.4 0.167964471 194402.079 Total 1.474 686159.901 Total Avg. Recharge Rate (mm/yr) 465.5 AREA 3 a) AREA 3 Modelling Data 98.6 0.257 25346.878 356.3 0.133 47323.170 282.7 0.002 605.609 56.1 0.011 600.896 421.6 0.054 22579.116 21.7 0.019 418.378 22.1 0.004 94.687 1157.4 0.058 66944.293 b) AREA 3 No Modelling Data 356.3 0.363 129471.225 1157.4 0.040 45740.448 Total 0.941 339124.698 Total Avg. Recharge Rate (mm/yr) 360.5 AREA 4 a) AREA 4 Modelling Data 421.6 0.047 19754.536 356.3 0.165 58871.251 182.2 0.042 7638.533 98.6 0.560 55196.992 4096.6 0.037 151540.062 1157.4 0.037 42814.155 b) AREA 4 No Modelling Data 98.6 0.059 5785.296 819.4 0.001 717.467 Total 0.947 342318.291 Total Avg. Recharge Rate (mm/yr) 361.3 4-8 122219T111_W122003002KWO

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION TARGETS TABLE 4.3 GAWSER MODEL EXISTING PEAK FLOW RATE RESULTS FOR ALDER CREEK Location Railway Embankment Upstream of Petersburg GAWSER ID Return Period 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr Reg. #505.74 1.42 1.76 2.65 2.78 2.97 4.63 Snider Rd. at Petersburg #207 1.18 2.27 2.8 4.49 5.2 6.18 12.56 Hwy 7/8 West Branch #16 3.7 6.75 8.32 14.3 17.65 21.86 60.45 Alder East Branch #28 4.21 6.62 7.98 9.88 10.97 16.34 57.39 Confluence of West and East Branches #230 7.87 13.36 16.3 24.14 28.62 37.52 117.84 Bleams Road #238 9.57 16.34 20.34 32.34 39.2 47.72 140.11 Alder Creek upstream of trailer park tributary #56 11.31 19.66 24.63 39.63 48.6 59.75 164.6 Alder Creek downstream of trailer park tributary #257 13.28 23.45 29.53 48.51 59.63 74.03 206.72 Alder Creek at WSC gauge, Huron Road #259 13.79 24.5 30.99 51.16 63.27 78.54 224.8 Trout Tributary #167 1.78 3.45 4.57 8.11 10.58 13.51 44.79 Confluence of Trout Tributary and Alder Creek #467 15.38 27.64 35.15 58.87 73.4 91.5 269.59 Alder Lake #269 16.01 29.65 38.12 64.98 81.78 105.78 316.15 Alder Lake at New Dundee (in) #270 16.27 30.77 39.77 68.09 85.9 111.02 318.78 Alder Lake at New Dundee (out) #570 14.6 29.1 35.64 60.18 76.3 99.13 298.52 GRCA Town line Gauge #287 10.84 29.79 36.47 61.9 78.6 102.41 306.59 Outlet to Nith River #291 10 30.45 37.45 63.62 81.1 105.93 315.84 *Note: Refer to complete hydrologic output tables in Appendix B TABLE 4.4 PEAK FLOWS IN CURRENT UPPER STRASBURG CREEK WATERSHED (M 3 /S) Location Upper Portion of Subwatershed Area GAWSER ID Unrouted With Culvert 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr Reg. 100-Yr Reg. 1207.04.07.09.3.43.65 3.17.65 3.17 West of Fischer-Hallman 1217.16.32.39.86 1.16 1.69 6.21 1.69 6.21 North of Bleams Road 1227.43.77.92 1.43 1.79 2.7 7.52 2.7 7.52 Fischer-Hallman Culvert 1230.55 1.03 1.26 2.16 2.76 3.6 12.7 1.96 2.65 To Sunfish Pond 742.52 1.0 1.22 2.18 2.86 3.86 14.14 2.19 5.48 Total Above Development Area 753.79 1.44 1.75 2.92 3.71 4.95 17.75 3.23 9.86 Development Area 2501.52 1.05 1.31 1.7 1.93 2.23 8.08 2.23 8.08 Total with Development Area 2531 1.28 2.48 3.03 4.52 5.54 7.1 24.33 5.35 16.44 Total at Huron Road 1256 1.47 2.83 3.46 5.08 6.18 7.87 27.86 6.22 20.12 *Note: Refer to complete hydrologic output tables in Appendix B 122219T111_W122003002KWO 4-9

ALDER CREEK WATERSHED STUDY AND UPPER STRASBURG CREEK SUBWATERSHED PLAN -FINAL REPORT Goal is to maintain water quality in Alder Creek and tributaries and Upper Strasburg Creek. Target Provide Enhanced or normal stormwater quality control in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment SWM criteria as recommended in Section 10.5 of this report Goal is to maintain or improve aquatic habitat in Alder Creek and tributaries and Upper Strasburg Creek. Target Maintain cold water fisheries habitats that currently exist (see Appendix C for stream conditions that must be maintained, Strasburg Creek Master Drainage Plan Study Report [Paragon Engineering and Ecologistics, 1991]) Target Improve warm water fisheries areas to cold water fisheries through improvements in groundwater recharge and protection of surface water resources from temperature increases 3) Provide land use management recommendations that will protect vulnerable groundwater areas and well head protection areas: Goal is to reduce the impact of existing land uses on groundwater resources and minimize the impact from new land uses Target Make land use decisions that would lead to an improvement in water quality Target Mitigate the impacts of any land use changes through appropriate SWM practices Target Apply and/or maintain existing well head protection areas in the watershed identified in the Region s Water Resources Protection Strategy and watershed based source water protection initiatives Target Maintain land use programs identified in this study, the Region s Water Resources Protection Strategy and watershed based source water protection initiatives Target Any new development must achieve Reasonable Use Criteria at property boundaries and cumulatively at the water supply in regard to the impacts of road salt applications to groundwater contamination Target Maintain the function of the hummocky terrain in the watershed as it relates to the distribution and maintenance of groundwater infiltration rates 4) Provide guidance on natural heritage components in the watershed Goal is to protect or enhance existing natural heritage features in the watershed Target Maintain existing wetland form and function as defined in this report Target Stabilize erosion areas in the watershed Target Improvement in extent and function of riparian cover in the watershed Target Maintain or enhance form and function of existing hectares of woodland area Target Maintain or improve the form and function of wildlife/greenspace linkages 4-10 122219T111_W122003002KWO

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION TARGETS 5) Look at opportunities for improving the water quality in Alder Lake and reducing the impact of Alder Lake on the downstream aquatic environment: Goal is to improve water quality in Alder Lake and in the downstream aquatic environment Target Reduce sediment load to Alder Lake Target Reduction in nutrient loading emanating from existing sediments in the lake Target Improve water quality to levels above PWQOs Target Improve water quality downstream of Alder Lake 122219T111_W122003002KWO 4-11