AEROSPACE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STANDARDS - AS 9100 SERIES ליכטנשטיין שלמה מנהל ניהול האיכות במטה התעשייה האווירית בע"ממ יוו"ר מגזר תעשיות ביטחוניות תעופה וחלל באיגוד הישראלי לאיכות, 28/1/2005 S.Lichtenstein 1
HISTORY OF 9100 28/1/2005 S.Lichtenstein 2
Background - Early to mid-1990s Quality Control ( Inspect In Quality at end of line) MIL-I-45208 1940 s-60 s Quality Assurance ( Inspect In Quality In Process) MIL-Q-9858 1960 s-80 s Quality Assurance Management ( Manufacture In Quality ) ISO 9001,2,3 1980 s-end 90 s Regulations (FAA, JAA, ESA, etc) Customers Specific Requirements S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 3
Background - Early to mid-1990s DOD (US Department of Defense) canceled quality system specifications (MIL-Q-9858) FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) lacks a definitive description of a quality system (FAR 21 & FAR145) Defense Customers and Aerospace Primes (mainly in Europe) began to flow ISO 9000 series plus unique requirements to suppliers Suppliers asked industry to standardize Needed to operate a single quality system Already adopting ISO 9000 series S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 4
U.S. Industry Response - 1995 Supplier Management and Quality Assurance professionals from: AlliedSignal Boeing GE Engines Lockheed Martin McDonnell Douglas Pratt & Whitney Rockwell Collins Rolls-Royce Allison Sundstrand Northrop Grumman Sponsors Aviation/Space & Defense Division of American Society for Quality SAE Aerospace Council S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 5
Aerospace Industry Agree: Where aerospace quality and safety is concerned... there is no competitive advantage S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 6
Aerospace Standard birth D1-9000 Company MIL-I FAA Specific Req mts ISO-9001 Inputs NASA MIL-Q DoD AS9100 S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 7
Global Quality Standard Activity S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 8
A Global Organization International Aerospace Quality Group IAQG Council General Assembly Forums AAQG (Americas) EAQG (Europe) APAQG (Asia) Whose purpose is: Implement initiatives that make significant improvements in Quality and reduction in cost, throughout the value stream, by establishing and maintaining dynamic cooperation, based on trust, between international aerospace companies S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 9
Global Approach to Improvement Over 50 major aerospace companies across three global sectors Improvement through implementation of effective quality management systems and practices System and product integrity initiatives driven with constancy of purpose Co-operation, consultation and communication with: partners and suppliers airworthiness authorities customers across all sectors of business S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 10
An Organization of Co-operation operation Americas The Boeing Company Bombardier CAE Embraer GE Aircraft Engines Goodrich Corporation Gulfstream Honeywell Aerospace Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman Orbital Parker Aerospace Raytheon Rockwell Collins Rolls-Royce Royce Corporation Textron United Technologies Corp. Vought PRI SAE Europe Europe Continued Airbus Turbomeca ALENIA BAE Systems Volvo Aero Dassault Aviation Westland Helicopters EADS Zodiac EADS CASA EADS Military AECMA Eurocopter Asia (Fiat) Avio Aerospace Industrial Fokker Aerostructures Development Corp. Westlands Aviation Industries of China Hegan Fuji Heavy Industries Hispano-Suiza Israel Aircraft Industries Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Messier-Bugatti Industries Messier-Dowty Kawasaki Heavy Ind MTU Aero engine Korea Aerospace Ind Rolls-Royce Royce Korean Air Aerospace SAAB Aerospace Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Smiths Industries SNECMA Moteurs Shin Mayawa Ind Sonaca SJAC Sukhoi S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 11
International Quality System Standard Creation 1998 Americas Standard ISO 9001 1994 European Standard AS9000 pren 9000-1 World Aerospace Quality Standard ; AS/EN/JIS Q 9100 AS9100 ISO TC 20 EN 9100 WG11 S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 12
Why 9100? To standardize Aerospace quality expectations on a global level To achieve improvements in quality and reduce costs throughout the value stream ISO 9000 model for quality does not capture regulatory requirements or importance of safety, reliability or maintainability Captures aerospace supplements agreed to at an international level S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 13
AEROSPACE SUPPLY CHAIN 9110 for Repair Stations 9100 Tier 2 Integrators / Source Control/ Software Dev./ Major Assemblies Tier 1 Vehicle / Airframe / Propulsion Manufacture Variation Reduction FAI Process Proving 9120 Tier 3 - Integrators / Source Control / Specialty Electronics / Wiring / Compnts Tier 4 - Make to Print / Machine Shops / Processors Tier 5 - Distributors (Fasteners, Raw Materials, Commodities, Adhesives, Special Materials) Tier 6 - Raw Materials (Castings, Forgings, Sheet, etc) Special Processes Company Specific or NADCAP S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 14
Aerospace Quality Standards Numbering System International Standards - 91xx Harmonized across all 3 aerospace sectors and are recognized globally AS Standards - Americas Published by Society of Automotive Engineers EN Standards - Europe published in Europe by ASD (former AECMA) JIS Q or SJAC is the Japan / Asia Equivalent S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 15
Aerospace Quality System Standards INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS 9100 - Quality System for Aerospace Manufacturers 9101 - Check sheet for 9100 9110 - Quality System for Aerospace Repair Stations 9111 - Check sheet for 9110 9120 - Quality System for Distributors 9121 - Check sheet for 9120 S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 16
Aerospace Quality System 9100 Standard versus ISO 9001 9100 added 83 additional and specific requirements to the 20 elements of ISO 9001 11 amplifications of ISO 9001 paragraphs are also inserted Emphasis is placed on Design Control, Process Control, Purchasing, Inspection & Testing and Control of Non conformances All areas that have the greatest impact on safety and reliability for aerospace products S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 17
100 Specifics (where ISO 001 implies 9100 requires) ISO 9001: Generic quality management system standard - applicable to shoes as well as to airplanes 9100: Includes all ISO 9001 requirements Adds the expectations of the aerospace industry for a robust quality management system for aerospace products Continuous Improvement: Continuous improvement processes shall include provision for using the quality policy, quality objectives, audit results, measurement and analysis of data, variability reduction, corrective and preventive action, and management review (all but variability reduction are part of 9001:2000 requirements) S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 18
ISO9001 versus 9100 9100 version is formatted to match ISO 9001:2000 and added requirements that provide for - Regulatory organizations interfaces Configuration Management Design and Development V& V., & V&V testing Control of changes in Production Process Control of production equipment, tools, NC machines Control of work in outside facilities Control of service operations First Article Inspection Inspection documentation These added requirements enables a standardized approach to supplier flow down requirements S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 19
9100: Quality Management Systems (ISO Clause 4) Requirements of regulatory authorities must be included in documentation Including access by authorities to the records, documentation and change approval (as req d) Must show relationship of 9100 standard to lower level procedures Documented procedure for records control Requires Configuration Management for the product / process S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 20
100: roduct Realization (ISO Clause 7) Design and Development output includes: Identification of Key Characteristics (FMECA) All necessary data to manufacture the product Gated Design Reviews Documentation of both Design Verification and Design Validation (reports / calculations / etc.) Design Verification and Validation testing Design Change Control Includes customer and regulatory approval as necessary S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 21
100: roduct Realization (ISO Clause 7) Purchasing Responsible for all suppliers (incl. customer designated ones) Must have a list of suppliers Supplier performance review process Control of special process sources Whoever approves a supplier, can disapprove them as well Stringent flow down requirements - sub-tier Notification of nonconformance / process change Right of access by customer and regulatory personne S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 22
100: roduct Realization (ISO Clause 7) Planning for Production and Service: Control plans and process controls In-process verification for hidden features Design of tooling for variable measurements Controlled Production accountability of product during manufacture evidence all operations are complete FOD control monitoring of environmental influences criteria for workmanship Use of approved data and specified tooling with instructions S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 23
9100 Special Process Requirements 7.5.2 Validation of processes for production and service processes where the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measurement. NOTE: These processes are frequently referred to as special processes. demonstrate the ability of these processes to achieve planned results. establish arrangements for these processes including, as applicable a) defined criteria for review and approval of the processes, qualification and approval of special processes prior to use, b) approval of equipment and qualification of personnel, c) use of specific methods and procedures, control of the significant operations and parameters of special processes in accordance with documented process specifications and changes thereto, d) requirements for records (see 4.2.4), and e) revalidation. S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 24
Special Process Approval Objectives To put in place industry controlled process for meeting requirements of 9100 clause 7.5.2 Supplier processes are an extension of the OEM processes To reduce redundant audits for the special process at suppliers and improve the global quality level Common requirements (auditors and audit questionnaires) Harmonized assessment process Data exchange Demonstrated industry managed process Process oversight Mutual system recognition NADCAP/ASD PRO S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 25
9100 Introduces Two important Concepts for Aerospace First Article Inspections Always required 9102 is mentioned for Guidance 9102 is only mandatory when specifically required in contracts Key Characteristics When specified 9103 is referenced for guidance 9103 is only mandatory when specifically required in contracts and key characteristics are identified S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 26
9102 First Article Inspection FAIs apply: to assemblies and all levels of parts within an assembly, including castings and forgings Suppliers responsible for ensuring that characteristics conform to Customer requirements Sub-tier suppliers and processors of parts and materials for suppliers S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 27
What is Included in First Article Inspection? Verification of All Design Characteristics: Dimensional Verification via Marked-up (or Ballooned ) Drawings that Correlate Characteristic Number from FAI to the Drawing. Part Marking Material and Special Process Certifications Including Operator Certifications (e.g. NDT, Welding) Manufacturing Process Verifications Manufacturing Routing Sheets. Referenced Exhibits Supporting the FAI (e.g. CMM Data Printouts, Test Data, Acceptance Test Procedures, Process Certifications, etc.). Process Capability Studies, As Applicable. Gauge Correlation, As Applicable. Tooling Traceability, If Tooling Is Used to Verify Design Characteristics Nonconformance Resolutions S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 28
9102 First Article Inspection Any 9100 compliant organization in absence of a contractual requirement to use 9102 or other specific FAI customer requirement, can devise any methods and processes it chooses to meet the requirements of this clause and the "extent" of an FAI is also at the discretion of the organization as along as it is applied to each " new part" and subsequent changes thereto. New part means Parts, sub-assemblies and assemblies, however FAI s are progressive S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 29
9103 Key Characteristics Variation Management of Key Characteristics will provide a common standard for expectations for KC s within the aerospace industry. Key Characteristic (9100): The features of a material or part whose variation has a significant influence on the fit, performance, service life, or manufacturability. Dimensional features - thickness, diameter, length, etc. Chemical concentrations Time, Pressure, speed, rates, temperature, etc. S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 30
Variation Management of Key Characteristics Purpose (9103) Intent to drive the improvement of the manufacturing processes through adequate planning and effective management of Key Characteristic variation. Methodology for component/process proving focused on Key Characteristics. Understanding processes Using appropriate tools Demonstrating acceptable process capabilities Guidelines for reporting process capability data to primes. S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 31
9100 Checklist - 9101 IAQG developed 9101 Common Checklist to be used by industry to cover all ISO 9001 & 9100 elements - allows industry to share audit information Must be used by Certification Bodies when performing 9100 audits S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 32
9110 Repair Station Quality System EN 9110 developed and implemented in Europe for facilities that perform maintenance and repairs of aircraft and aircraft products and adopted by other sectors Based on 9100 requirements and FAA / JAA - JAR 145 requirements Corresponding 9111 checklist has also been developed and published S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 33
9120 Distributor Quality System EN 9120 developed and implemented in Europe for pass through stockists / distributors that handle parts and supplies that are used in aerospace products International harmonized standard is agreed Checklist 9121 is also available Based on 9100, but only applies necessary system requirements. S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 34
Industry Leaders are Listening Agreed to improve the overall approach to quality Major Aerospace Companies have agreed upon Quality Management System approval approaches A key objective is to reduce the number of audits There are significant benefits to the Aerospace Industry Working to develop our International processes to incorporate the new approach International approach is based on a single agreed standard, harmonization of system application and share information
Summary A single 9100 Aerospace standard An agreed single International procedure of application Sector scheme procedures harmonised and complete Implementation planned aggressively during 2005 Establish a mechanism for data exchange International auditor training and qualifications Continue to communicate to all Team will co-ordinate ordinate implementation programs Monitor and maintain progress
QUESTIONS S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 37
S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 38
S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 39
S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 40
S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 41
S.Lichtenstein 28/1/2005 42