THE ROSLIN INSTITUTE KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE AND COMMERCIALISATION Strategy 2012-2017



Similar documents
Impact and Knowledge Exchange Strategy Delivering Impact from Research Excellence

1. What are the key strengths and weaknesses of the UK s innovation system in relation to business-university collaboration?

Graduate School of Biological Sciences Quality Assurance Model for Postgraduate Research Programmes November 2012

OFFICE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL AFFAIRS AND TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION

Jeremy Pearson Cardiovascular Division

THE LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH

Towards a competency framework for student work-based learning

SCOTTISH LIFESCIENCES ASSOCIATION. Life Sciences in Scotland - University / Business Issues

Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science

CONCORDAT IMPLEMENTATION

AHDB JOB DESCRIPTION

To lead, manage, and develop the OPF and build an international community of practitioners working in in the field of digital preservation.

Principal Job Description

People & Organisational Development Strategy

Job Opportunities. Date: March 6, Application deadline: March 16, Duty station: AFENET Secretariat

JOB DESCRIPTION. JOB TITLE: Head Central Services Unit POST REF: 12P/0095

Advocacy 20 Creating an internal IP-aware culture resulting in early capture of IP

Quick Reference. Future Manufacturing Platform Grants

RDF Planner Pilot Evaluation June 2013

Spin-out versus Licence

2014/15 has proven to be a most exciting time in the development of IAC - The Centre for Adoption.

Sustainable Farm Animal Breeding and Reproduction Technology Platform

HM Treasury Taskforce

POSTGRADUATE MASTERS DEGREES 2015 BIOSCIENCE, BIOTECHNOLOGY, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION

Managing Innovation & Intellectual Property Rights. Document author Assured by Review cycle. Executive Team. 1. Introduction Purpose...

The Cell Therapy Catapult

How To Help Your Educational Psychology Service Self Evaluate

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

The NHS as a Driver for Growth. A report by The Prime Minister s Council for Science and Technology

Spin-Out Company Formation Knowledge Transfer Guidance Document. August 2011

Future Research Leaders call 2015/16 Guidance notes for non-academic reviewers

Ten Years of ETT/PUCRS: Good practices on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer

The Experience of UK Technology Transfer Offices.

13. Performance Management

Research is everybody s business

This document covers the AHRC s expectations in respect of support and development for Early Career Researchers (ECR).

Management School. MRes. Business and Management Research Methods. University of Stirling Management School

GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTILIBILITY FRAMEWORK

British Antarctic Survey Action Plan

Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England

INVITATION TO BECOME AN ASSOCIATE OF THE EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION

Assisted Living IP Programme Manager

Policy for the Exploitation of University Intellectual property - Formation of New Companies

Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship. Innovative. Innovative. Enabling successful enterprise through practical training and development

Edital Faperj n.º 38/2014 RCUK CONFAP RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS CALL FOR PROJECTS

Project Management. Dissemination and Exploitation Services in Horizon 2020

Teaching Scotland s Future - National Partnership Group. Report to Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning

Manager for Social Sciences External Relations. Full time. Permanent. External and internal candidates

How To Be A Global Leader In Research At Cranfield University

Work with your prospective supervisors to complete your application.

Economic Impact of Research & Commercialisation at Leiden University & Leiden University Medical Centre

Report of a Peer Learning Activity in Limassol, Cyprus October School Leadership for learning

How To Become An Ambassador Of The European Enterprise Network

SFI Research Centres Management and Governance Requirements

Faculty of Biological Sciences POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH DEGREES 2014

European Commission Contract no. FIF : Users Guide to European Regulation in Biotechnology. Final Report, Part I: Complete text

How To Manage A Project

Accreditation Scheme for Museums and Galleries in the United Kingdom: Accreditation Standard

ESKITP Implement procedures and standards relating to metrics for IT service delivery

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Intellectual Property (IP), Revenue Sharing & Equity Policy

Co-creation progress update and an invitation to respond. Overview of ideas from co-creation activities towards a Climate Ready UK...

JOB DESCRIPTION. Post Title: PRINCIPAL S PA. Post Holder: [ADD POST HOLDER NAME]

Tanzania South Korea Joint Call for Research Proposals

University Proof of Concept & Seed Funds

JOB DESCRIPTION. Line management. Programme leader BSc Applied Psychology

Statement of ethical principles for biotechnology in Victoria

A Strategy for Personal and Public Involvement (PPI) in Cancer Research in Northern Ireland

How To Be Accountable To The Health Department

JOB DESCRIPTION. 1. JOB TITLE: Senior Lecturer in Computer Science (Cyber Security)

A Degree in Science is:

Technology Transfer Management Key Factors of Success. Elena Andonova, MBA September 14 th, 2015, Budapest, Hungary

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Career planning at Cardiff University

The Intellectual Property in the collaboration between Public Research Organisations and industry

Occupant: Vacant File reference: 2011/0390

The OIE Regional Communications Workshop. a Strategy for Animal Health Communication. As of 10 November 2009

PROPOSAL ACRONYM - ETN / EID / EJD (delete as appropriate and include as header on each page) START PAGE MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS

National Standards for Headteachers

Roche Position on Human Stem Cells

Financial sector leadership on natural capital

University of the West of England, Bristol. Intellectual Property Policy

Healthcare Science Programme Guide

Nuclear Physics Technology Showcase Event 26 September 2013, IoP London. STFC External Innovations Programme Funding Schemes

Job description and person specification

the independent broker role and training requirements

research center concept

Welcome to the ASTP Proton Knowledge Transfer Survey

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer in Crime Scenes Investigation

Nottingham Trent University Learning and Development Strategy

JOB DESCRIPTION. Position Title and Number: Senior Procurement Officer (100618) Health, Wellbeing & Commissioning

Guidelines for Animal Disease Control

JOB DESCRIPTION. 1. JOB TITLE: Senior Lecturer in Marketing and Public Relations. 4. DEPARTMENT: Warrington School of Management.

IDENTIFICATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMMERCIALISATION OF UNIVERSITY-OWNED R&D INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Establishing a Regulatory Framework for Credentialing

Post Title and Post Number Postgraduate Recruitment Officer External Relations

Membership Management and Engagement Strategy

The Standards for Leadership and Management: supporting leadership and management development December 2012

FURTHER PARTICULARS OF STUDENTSHIP

This form should be completed by the line manager requiring an evaluation of a NEW post.

HR Manager (Partners)

Transcription:

THE ROSLIN INSTITUTE KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE AND COMMERCIALISATION Strategy 2012-2017 1. Vision and Strategy The Roslin Institute (RI) aims to enhance the lives of animals and humans through world class research in animal biology. Knowledge exchange and commercialisation (KEC) is a key contributor towards this aim of producing research with applications and impact outside of the research community. a. Background In May 2008, the institute became a part of the University of Edinburgh. Excellence in innovation is at the heart of the University of Edinburgh s activities and accompanies education and research as one of the three strategic goals of the organisation (http://www.ed.ac.uk/schoolsdepartments/governance-strategic-planning/strategic-planning/strategic-plan-2012-16). The key aim of the University is to ensure our knowledge, ideas, skills and expertise are transformed into advice and opinion, innovation, intellectual property, enterprise and wealth, thereby realising national and international objectives and enriching society. The University is acknowledged as a sector-leader for KEC activity. It is the top ranked performer for university company formation in the last 3 year period (PraxisUnico Spinouts UK Survey Annual Report 2012) and the combined contribution of its company formation and licensing activity has an annual impact of 140m GVA and 2400 jobs (Economic Impact of the University of Edinburgh s Commercialisation Activity, BiGGAR Economics, 2012). ERI staff are based on The Roslin institute site full time, thereby providing the essential personal contact with researchers. In addition to providing traditional technology transfer support, the BD team also support knowledge exchange in a wider sense, with a particular focus on collaborative activities with industry. The RI KEC strategy is founded on a set of guiding principles and developed based on previous experience at the institute and expertise from ERI. b. Guiding principles In order to deliver a successful KEC strategy, a set of guiding principles has been developed: KEC at RI is in harmony with the institute s academic obligations and is core to RI strategy and aspirations The companies, policymakers and other stakeholders we work with are our partners and we aim for a knowledge transfer outcome that is beneficial to all IP will be protected (i.e. patent applications filed) when there is a clear path to market and/or a commercial partner identified The Business Development (BD) team coordinating KEC is an integral part of RI and is located on the same premises while still being employed by ERI and benefitting from the experience and expertise of other business development staff at the university c. RI commitment to KEC RI scientists commitment to KEC is apparent at all levels of the organisation. Most of our senior academics have longstanding relationships with company partners whereas the more junior researchers are beginning to interact with industry through joint CASE studentships and networks. The KEC agenda is championed by the director and mentioned frequently in addresses to staff which has resulted in 83% of Roslin group leaders being involved in KEC

activities and more than two thirds having an on-going project that includes at least one company partner. Projects range from studentships to LINK grants, EC projects and company funded collaborative projects. 2. Plans to implement strategy RI research impacts 4 market sectors: animal breeding, animal health and welfare (livestock and companion animals), biotechnology and human health. All of these sectors fit into areas of high strategic priority for the BBSRC. Animal breeding and animal health are key to food security as livestock makes an important contribution to food supplies in both developed and developing countries, and demand for animal protein is increasing. Animal health, biotechnology and human health are linked both through animal models of disease as well as the importance of zoonotic disease, and RI s holistic approach under the One Medicine theme supports the strategic aim of obtaining a true understanding of basic bioscience underpinning health, as well as moving through to applying this understanding for treatment and prevention of disease in animals and man. Finally, the biotechnology market underpins all research and development creating better reagents and methodologies. Currently we have on-going relationships with over 50 companies covering all of the above market sectors and this list continues to grow. Projects undertaken in collaboration with industrial partners are at various stages of development, from very early stage research supported largely by schemes such as CASE studentships and IPA awards to more applied developmental projects, licensing deals and consultancy. Our priority aim over the next 5 years is to maintain and further develop long standing relationships with industry and to continue to enhance our understanding of industry needs, priorities and limitations within the 4 market sectors identified. Our KEC objectives are: Maintain the current large number of industry interactions. Obtain and develop new company contacts. Continue to improve our understanding of industry needs by organising industry focused events and visits. Develop strategic partnerships, where a portfolio of interactions (from early stage research to applied research and consultancy) are carried out with a company and projects are supported at all stages of development. a. Identifying, understanding and developing the potential of the intellectual assets of RI In order to fully understand and identify all the intellectual assets of RI (including areas of interest and expertise), BD staff have regular one-to-one meetings with RI group leaders. These meetings allow projects that require KEC support to be identified and progressed and establish a productive relationship between the BD team and researchers, which is crucial to ensure long term KEC success. Key activities for the next 5 years include: Formal reviews with group leaders to be held every 2 years (target: 40 interviews). Newly recruited group leaders will have a BD interview as a part of their induction no later than 6 months after their start date. A key factor for KEC success are strong relationships between BD staff and researchers, which must be developed informally as well. The BD team will have an open-door policy so researchers can ask questions and share ideas and concerns at a time convenient to them. Because the BD team are co-located with the researchers there are ample opportunities to catch up, enabling the BD staff to keep up to date with current scientific interests and explore knowledge exchange prospects (A key strategy as identified by Technology Transfer Tactics Dec 2007).

Following ERI processes for development, marketing and commercialisation of intellectual assets which include attendance of IP development, licensing and commercialisation meetings. b. Identifying, managing, developing and commercialising the intellectual property of RI When RI became a part of the University in 2008 the whole patent portfolio was reviewed and any patents not being actively commercialised or generating industrial interest were dropped. A new policy has since been adopted that IP will not be patented unless there is clear industry support or a clear path to market is apparent. At present the institute is actively commercialising 6 patent families, of which 5 are being supported by industry, all of these patents have further funding associated with them and work to exemplify and strengthen applications is on-going. In addition we are part owners of 3 other patent families that are being managed by company partners or in another academic institution. Our key activities regarding patent portfolio management are: Prior to filing a priority patent a case is presented to the Science Management Group (SMG) setting out the path to market and industrial support. SMG approval is required before proceeding with the filing. Each patent will be reviewed on an annual basis, when a report will be produced on commercialisation progress and SMG/ Director s approval will be required prior to proceeding with support for this patent. BD and legal staff also provide a first point of contact with patent agents and handle all patent management. In many areas of Roslin research, patenting is not appropriate or conducive towards successful KEC. Specifically in the animal breeding sector when valuable genetic markers are identified, each marker needs to be protected individually, making patenting overly expensive and unpractical. Nonetheless, the markers themselves as well as the processes (e.g. software tools) by which they are derived are valuable and are usually put to commercial use through the company partners involved in the project prior to being published, which is the best way to ensure take-up by industry. c. Supporting proof of concept (POC) and translational work A key role of BD staff is to support researchers in applying for POC and translational funds, to add value to IP and further develop technologies, through the following activities: Liaison with BBSRC, Scottish Enterprise, TSB, Wellcome Trust, Biosciences KTN and other funders to ensure that there is a good understanding of funds available and eligibility criteria (this is carried out in conjunction with the ERI BD team). Liaison internally within the University managers of Edinburgh BioQuarter and Initiating Knowledge Transfer funds, schemes set up to support early stage POC projects. Ensuring that researchers are informed about funds available to them for translational work and discussing and advising on funds appropriate for each project. Co-writing applications for translational funds, in particular sections relating to the commercialisation development plan, market information and company interaction. Co-managing the translational project, ensuring that KEC remains the priority focus of the project and a commercially-relevant perspective is maintained. Target: 10 applications for translational funds/ year. Where appropriate, translational work may also be directly supported by companies in which case BD staff provide a brokering, relationship management, liaison and negotiation service. d. Networking and outreach to business and other users Our aim over the next 5 years is to further improve and increase interaction with industry, so networking and outreach is a key focus activity carried out by both researchers and the BD team. Key activities include: Large events: Large scale events were held in April 2009 and June 2011, both events had representatives from over 30 companies attending, alongside funder, government

and levy board representatives. Such events showcase the work of the whole institute and are a good opportunity for establishing new contacts and presenting the wide spectrum of Roslin research. We will continue to host such events (target: event every 2-3 years). Focussed events: in addition to the large scale event we also aim to host events focussed on a specific field of interest (e.g. human health focus event hosted in 2010, Welfare and reproduction focussed event hosted in 2012) which will be a combination of presentations and 1:1 meetings between companies and researchers (target: event every 2 years). Individual visits: for companies where a portfolio of interactions may be possible, personalised visits with multiple meetings with researchers organised and time for discussions of company priorities will be hosted (target 4 visits per year). Creating a database of contacts : much of the networking is carried out by academics at conferences (e.g. ISAG) and steering group meetings for currently on-going projects (e.g. EC or LINK projects) therefore a key activity will be to compile a central database of all industry contacts held by the individual researchers who can be contacted regarding potential collaboration opportunities. (Target: database of at least 800 contacts by 2015). Relationship management: specific follow-up of projects that are reaching conclusion, including small-scale ones (e.g. consultancy, CASE studentships) may identify new industry needs and opportunities for collaboration. e. Assessing the needs of users Many of the outreach and networking activities detailed above will also help us to better understand the needs of our users. In addition we plan to undertake the following activities: Establishment of a small network of industry experts to comprise a Roslin Institute Industry Advisory Board to meet annually and discuss industry needs and concerns and be available throughout the year for input on specific projects (target: board comprising 4 members, each from a key target market established by 2015). A BBSRC representative will also be invited as an observer to this group. Visits to key company partners. In the past we have tended to rely on companies visiting the institute premises, but occasionally it may be just as appropriate for an RI BD and PI delegation to visit the company premises, in particular as this would help to switch the focus to company needs rather than institute offerings, providing a new perspective. Interaction with intermediary organisations to discuss market pull and industry needs (target: 6 monthly meetings with the Biosciences KTN and annual meetings with UK Trade and Investment Animal Health representative). f. Influencing policy users RI academics will continue to be involved in advising on policy on animal welfare, biodiversity, transgenic animals, tuberculosis, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and other animal health and breeding issues. Influence and involvement in these areas will be through membership on policy panels of the following bodies: FAO, European Food Standards Agency (EFSA), The Food and Environment Research Agency, Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens, Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC), World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), DEFRA (sub-committee TB diagnosis), The National Standing Committee on Farm Animal Genetic Resources, the European Farm Animal Breeding and Reproduction Technology Platform. Through our involvement on these panels we help shape policy and regulations. Prof Manson s involvement in SEAC for example contributed to the development of policies to control BSE and vcjd that have significantly reduced the risks from those diseases. Similarly, Dr Hocking s advisory role on the EFSA working group on broiler welfare has contributed to the published scientific report that now informs EU legislation. Prof Whitelaw was a member of the Biotechnology group reporting to the OIE Biological Standards Commission. The group developed guidelines on the animal health risks arising from somatic cell nuclear transfer

cloning of production animals, including criteria for assessing the health of embryos and animals derived from such cloning. g. Promoting an enterprise culture, incentivising researcher engagement in KEC Researcher engagement in KEC is strongly encouraged and incentivised. Under the University contract 50% of any income generated through licensing (below 50,000) and 35% thereafter is provided to the inventors. In addition 70% of all consultancy income is given directly to the academics. Many academics choose to put this directly back into funding further research or for example supporting a PhD travel fund. A 30% share of licensing income is retained by RI and this is re-channelled into the patent budget, to support future applications. KEC activity also forms a part of the review process when considering a researcher for promotion or for a merit award. Our experience has been that KEC activity does not occur at the expense of basic research or publications, and that the two tend to support each other so that researchers with the highest levels of success with publications and grants also tend to be those involved with the most KEC projects and with the highest number of company interactions. 2. Management of KEC activities a. How will activities be managed? RI KEC activities are managed in the context of ERI but with dedicated RI support: 2 dedicated business development staff (1.6 FTE) 2 dedicated legal staff (1.5 FTE) ERI licensing, consultancy and company formations support BD staff have access to the Inteum system, allowing logging and tracking of contacts, inventions, patents and contracts. This is further supported by the Info-ed and ER2 system that contract management use which logs financial and funder details. b. Key performance indicators in the context of strategy As the primary focus of our strategy is maintenance and further development of our company relationships, recording income and agreement numbers seems reasonable in the context of strategy. In terms of new relationships, we are able to record all parties that we have contractual relationships with as well as all interactions with companies through the BD office (e.g. CDAs, MTAs, people registered at events, discussions of technologies and markets. In addition a range of metrics are collected for the University which could be supplied if required, including numbers of invention disclosures, patent filed and numbers of licences. A further indicator of success in the context of our strategy will be the meeting of our targets as set out in section 2. The proportion of PIs who engage in KEC activities is an indicator of quality both in terms of the institute policy on KEC and in terms of the services provided by KEC staff. In addition, we will provide the BBSRC with case studies showcasing our activities and providing a more qualitative picture of the KEC environment and opportunities at RI. 4. Allocation of funding As The Roslin Institute will not receive KEC funds from BBSRC this section is not applicable.