Estimation of Perceived Flood Damage in Tokyo Metropolitan Area



Similar documents
Criminal Justice System on Crime *

Number of Levels Cumulative Annual operating Income per year construction costs costs ($) ($) ($) 1 600,000 35, , ,200,000 60, ,000

Can Auto Liability Insurance Purchases Signal Risk Attitude?

PRIVATE SCHOOL CHOICE: THE EFFECTS OF RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION AND PARTICIPATION

The Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey,

The Choice of Direct Dealing or Electronic Brokerage in Foreign Exchange Trading

APPLICATION OF PROBE DATA COLLECTED VIA INFRARED BEACONS TO TRAFFIC MANEGEMENT

Efficiency Test on Taiwan s Life Insurance Industry- Using X-Efficiency Approach

Diabetes as a Predictor of Mortality in a Cohort of Blind Subjects

Traffic-light a stress test for life insurance provisions

benefit is 2, paid if the policyholder dies within the year, and probability of death within the year is ).

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH (PYC 304-C) Lecture 12

How To Evaluate A Dia Fund Suffcency

Traffic-light extended with stress test for insurance and expense risks in life insurance

1.1 The University may award Higher Doctorate degrees as specified from time-to-time in UPR AS11 1.

On the Optimal Control of a Cascade of Hydro-Electric Power Stations

Causal, Explanatory Forecasting. Analysis. Regression Analysis. Simple Linear Regression. Which is Independent? Forecasting

Chapter 15 Debt and Taxes

Financial Instability and Life Insurance Demand + Mahito Okura *

Answer: A). There is a flatter IS curve in the high MPC economy. Original LM LM after increase in M. IS curve for low MPC economy

Analysis of Premium Liabilities for Australian Lines of Business

How To Trade Water Quality

Depreciation of Business R&D Capital

Stock Profit Patterns

A global view of managing water resources in Tunisia

Credit Limit Optimization (CLO) for Credit Cards

ECONOMICS OF PLANT ENERGY SAVINGS PROJECTS IN A CHANGING MARKET Douglas C White Emerson Process Management

STAMP DUTY ON SHARES AND ITS EFFECT ON SHARE PRICES

How To Calculate The Accountng Perod Of Nequalty

Oservce Vs. Sannet - Which One is Better?

A DYNAMIC CRASHING METHOD FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT USING SIMULATION-BASED OPTIMIZATION. Michael E. Kuhl Radhamés A. Tolentino-Peña

Course outline. Financial Time Series Analysis. Overview. Data analysis. Predictive signal. Trading strategy

Chapter 8 Group-based Lending and Adverse Selection: A Study on Risk Behavior and Group Formation 1

Chapter 15: Debt and Taxes

Chapter 7: Answers to Questions and Problems

The Linked World: Working Paper Series

Searching and Switching: Empirical estimates of consumer behaviour in regulated markets

Time Value of Money. Types of Interest. Compounding and Discounting Single Sums. Page 1. Ch. 6 - The Time Value of Money. The Time Value of Money

CHAPTER 14 MORE ABOUT REGRESSION

energies ISSN

Fragility Based Rehabilitation Decision Analysis

Mortgage Default and Prepayment Risks among Moderate and Low Income Households. Roberto G. Quercia. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSIS IN EXCEL

AN APPOINTMENT ORDER OUTPATIENT SCHEDULING SYSTEM THAT IMPROVES OUTPATIENT EXPERIENCE

Shielding Equations and Buildup Factors Explained

Faraday's Law of Induction

Physical activity patterns of European 50+ populations

Assurant Employee Benefits City of Frisco Dental DHMO & Dental PPO

Energy prices, energy efficiency, and fuel poverty 1. Vivien Foster, Jean-Philippe Tre, and Quentin Wodon. World Bank. September 2000.

The demand for private health care in the UK

Stress test for measuring insurance risks in non-life insurance

Risk-based Fatigue Estimate of Deep Water Risers -- Course Project for EM388F: Fracture Mechanics, Spring 2008

Factors Affecting Outsourcing for Information Technology Services in Rural Hospitals: Theory and Evidence

Activity Scheduling for Cost-Time Investment Optimization in Project Management

ANALYZING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN QUALITY, TIME, AND COST IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Does Higher Education Enhance Migration?

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION TO THE NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD

Assessment of the legal framework

TESTING FOR EVIDENCE OF ADVERSE SELECTION IN DEVELOPING AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE MARKET. Oksana Lyashuk

WORKING PAPERS. The Impact of Technological Change and Lifestyles on the Energy Demand of Households

Staff Paper. Farm Savings Accounts: Examining Income Variability, Eligibility, and Benefits. Brent Gloy, Eddy LaDue, and Charles Cuykendall

ADVERSE SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS: POLICYHOLDER EVIDENCE FROM THE U.K. ANNUITY MARKET *

Architectures and competitive models in fibre networks

High Correlation between Net Promoter Score and the Development of Consumers' Willingness to Pay (Empirical Evidence from European Mobile Markets)

Portfolio Loss Distribution

Social Exclusion and the Two-Tiered Healthcare System of Brazil

The impact of hard discount control mechanism on the discount volatility of UK closed-end funds

On Geographic Inequality in Japanese Regional Health Insurance

Labor Supply. Where we re going:

Vasicek s Model of Distribution of Losses in a Large, Homogeneous Portfolio

Wholesale pricing, NGA take-up and competition

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION

Power-of-Two Policies for Single- Warehouse Multi-Retailer Inventory Systems with Order Frequency Discounts

Uncrystallised funds pension lump sum

The Use of Analytics for Claim Fraud Detection Roosevelt C. Mosley, Jr., FCAS, MAAA Nick Kucera Pinnacle Actuarial Resources Inc.

HARVARD John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business

Using an Ordered Probit Regression Model to Assess the Performance of Real Estate Brokers

Problem Set 3. a) We are asked how people will react, if the interest rate i on bonds is negative.

Uncrystallised funds pension lump sum payment instruction

Health Insurance and Household Savings

The DAX and the Dollar: The Economic Exchange Rate Exposure of German Corporations

Transcription:

Estmaton of Perceved Flood Damage n Tokyo Metropoltan Area Azusa OKAGAWA* Akra HIBIKI* * Natonal Insttute for Envronmental Studes

Overvew Comparng prces of lands wth/wthout flood rsk Land prce wthout flood rsk γ Land prce wth flood rsk LP α β n Atrbute n, γ n FloodRsk u Unobservable varables Perceved flood rsk mght correlate wth unobservable determnant of land prces. => Two stage estmaton wth nstrumental varables 2

Background Clmate change wll brng an ncrease n frequency and severty of flood. Current flood control polcy has been mplemented based on the plan n absence of perspectve on adaptaton to clmate change. The measure of cost and beneft should be examned wth the perspectve on adaptaton. 3

The heavy ranfall havng 100 year recurrence nterval Toka heavy ran dsaster, September 2000 37% of cty area was flooded n Nagoya Nagoya s a central cty of Toka area wth populaton of 2 mllon. The flood caused by overflow banks. Most of recent floods n urban area are nland floodng. Somewater overflowed Nagoya s10 dkes. Tokyo metropoltan govt prepared flood hazard map. Osaka Nagoya Tokyo Cars under water* * Cabnet offce <http://www.bousa.go.jp/oshrase/h13/130126chubo/shryo3_3.html > Overflow water* (Nsh Bwajma) Waste due to flood* 4

Prevous studes Flood rsk > Reducton of land prce Hallstrom and Smth (2005) Bn and Polasky (2004) There exst many studes on flood damage by hedonc approach n Japan Problem of prevous studes Estmaton bas caused by omtted varables 5

Flood rsk varable Flood hazard map Issued by the Tokyo Metropoltan Govt Ths hazard maps based ontheresult offloodsmulatonflood onthe assumpton ofthe equvalent heavy ran to the Toka Flood Dsaster whch s expected to occur once every 100 year. Flood rsk varable: If the ste s ncluded n hazard area, DRsk = 1otherwse DRsk = 0 6

Problem of prevous studes Hedonc Land Prce model Land Prce Attrbutes Flood rsk dummy lnlp = α + X β + γdrsk + Attrbute varables: bl Unobservable bl varables bl Bulk rato, elevaton, Tme dstance to termnal statons, 23specal wards dummy, Ralwaylnedummy lne dummy, etc. Omtted varables brng estmaton bas on gamma and flood rsk mpact on land prce cannot be dentfed. p lmγˆ γ Cov( FloodRsk, OmttedVarables) Var ( FloodRsk) Two stage procedure u γ 7

Two stage estmaton Flood Hazard model Rsk PRsk δ Y θ e Flood factors: DsRver, Hollow, 23 specal lwards dummy, etc. 1 φ( δˆ θˆ) Y Predcted probablty Hd Hedonc Land dp Prce model dl DRsk ln LP α X β γ PRsk u 8

Instrumental varables Hollow mn( Elevaton n, ) Elevaton If the ste s lowest, the water cannot run off. Flood rsk could be hgher. Elev 1 Elev 2 Elev 3 Elev 4 Elev Elev 5 Hollow Hollow 0 0 f the ste s lowest otherwse 50m Elev 6 Elev 7 Elev 8 DsRver 50m : Dstance to the nearest rver If the ste s close to rvers, flood rsk could be hgher. 9

Coverage area and data Coverage area Tokyo 19 specal wards Excludng Katsushka, Shbuya, Aarakawa, Sumda The flood hazard map Publshed by the Tokyo Metropoltan Government Flood Rsk Dummy If the ste s located n the area explored by flood, DRsk = 1 Offcal Land Prce Reported by Mnstry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Toursm n 2009 Land prce, land shape, land use zonng, accessblty to the gas, water and sewerage utltes, the name of the nearest staton, the dstance from t, lot percentage regulaton, bulk rato regulaton, etc. Yahoo! route search Accessblty to termnal statons of JR Yamanote lne. http://transt.map.yahoo.co.jp/ 10

Man estmaton result Flood Hazard model Coef Std. error Intercept 0.475 0.323 DsRver 0.000 *** 0.000 Hollow 0.063063 ** 0.029029 Predected flood rsk PRsk 11

Man estmaton result 1 Hedonc land prce model Model 1 OLS estmaton 2-stage estmaton Coef Std err Coef Std err Constant 12.990*** 0.135 12.891*** 0.130 Flood rsk -0.034* 0.018-0.157*** 0.018 Bulk rato X Flood rsk Buldng coverage rate X Flood rsk Heght X Flood rsk Elevaton 0.008*** 008*** 0.001001 0.007*** 007*** 0.000000 Area (m 2 ) 0.000*** 0.000 0.000*** 0.000 Dstance from Staton -0.000*** 0.000-0.000*** 0.000 Tme dstance to termnal staton -0.010*** 0.002-0.010*** 0.001 Inner Yamanote lne 0.131*** 0.047 0.114*** 0.041 Bulk rato 0.003*** 0.000 0.003*** 0.000 Resdental area 1 dummy -0.109*** 0.027-0.090*** 0.027 Resdental area 2 dummy -0.196*** 0.029-0.174*** 0.029 Industral area dummy -0.125*** 0.029-0.074*** 0.030 Adj R squared 0.876 0.853 Endogenety test 採 択 Over dentfcaton test 採 択 Reducton of land prce (%) OLS: 3.4% 2 stage: 14.5% 12

Man estmaton result 2 Hedonc land prce model Model 2 OLS estmaton 2-stage estmaton Coef Std err Coef Std err Constant 12.960*** 0.136 12.878*** 0.136 Flood rsk 0.029 0.033-0.081** 0.036 Bulk rato X Flood rsk -0.000** 0.000-0.000*** 0.000 Buldng coverage rate X Flood rsk Heght X Flood rsk Elevaton 0.008*** 008*** 0.001001 0.007*** 007*** 0.001001 Area (m 2 ) 0.000*** 0.000 0.000*** 0.000 Dstance from Staton -0.000*** 0.000-0.000*** 0.000 Tme dstance to termnal staton -0.010*** 0.002-0.009*** 0.001 Inner Yamanote lne 0.130*** 0.047 0.102*** 0.043 Bulk rato 0.003*** 0.000 0.003*** 0.000 Resdental area 1 dummy -0.112*** 0.027-0.102*** 0.028 Resdental area 2 dummy -0.200*** 0.029-0.183*** 0.030 Industral area dummy -0.129*** 0.029-0.077*** 0.031 Adj R squared 0.877 0.843 Endogenety test 採 択 Over dentfcaton test 採 択 Reducton of land prce (%) OLS: 3.5% 2 stage: 16.0% 13

Man estmaton result 3 Hedonc land prce model Model 3 OLS estmaton 2-stage estmaton Coef Std err Coef Std err Constant 12.930*** 0.135 12.892*** 0.134 Flood rsk 0.489*** 0.092-0.247*** 0.102 Bulk rato X Flood rsk Buldng coverage rate X Flood rsk -0.009*** 0.002 0.004*** 0.000 Heght X Flood rsk 0.011 0.008-0.041*** 0.009 Elevaton 0.008*** 008*** 0.001001 0.007*** 007*** 0.001001 Area (m 2 ) 0.000*** 0.000 0.000*** 0.000 Dstance from Staton -0.000*** 0.000-0.000*** 0.000 Tme dstance to termnal staton -0.010*** 0.002-0.009*** 0.001 Inner Yamanote lne 0.132*** 0.046 0.098** 0.042 Bulk rato 0.003*** 0.000 0.003*** 0.000 Resdental area 1 dummy -0.135*** 0.027-0.100*** 0.028 Resdental area 2 dummy -0.238*** 0.030-0.172*** 0.031 Industral area dummy -0.159*** 0.029-0.072*** 0.031 Adj R squared 0.879 0.847 Endogenety test 採 択 Over dentfcaton test 採 択 Reducton of land prce (%) OLS: 3.7% 2 stage: 18.2% 14

Dscusson d Reducton rate of LP LP w LP w o Rsk / Rsk. 1 100 ( e 0 1) 100 14.5(%) / 157 Reducton n Land Prce: 169,438 yen/m 2 (1,631 EUR) Reducton 0.01 n LP 100 d(1 d) (1 ρ) t 0 99 t D 169,483 yen / m : occurrence probablty ρ 0. 03 : dscount rate 13,552 EUR/m 2 Average flood damage D = 1,408,049 049 yen/m 2 Not only physcal damage, but also ndrect damage such as loss of lfe, loss of proft, mentaldamage,etc. etc. 2 The Govt estmaton D = 33,199 yen/m 2 Only physcal damage 15

Concluson We estmated Hedonc Land Prce model by two stage estmaton to correct the bas caused by omtted varables. The reducton rate of land prce n hazardous area s 14.5% and the perceved flood damage s 1,408,049 yen/m 2 (13,552 EUR/m 2 ). Our estmate s much hgher than that of the Tokyo Metropoltan Government snce our estmate nclude not only physcal damage, but also ndrect damage such as opportunty proft and mental damage. Contact address: okagawa.azusa@nes.go.jp 16