DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL AMBIENT SOUND MONITORING NETWORK Annual Report For 2011

Similar documents
SOUND INSULATION FOR AIR CONDITIONERS AND OTHER EXTERNAL MECHANICAL PLANT. Installing and Maintaining Air Conditioning Units

GUIDELINE ON BOUNDARY NOISE LIMIT FOR AIR CONDITIONING AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS IN NON-INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS

Noise impact assessment of mass rapid transit systems in Delhi city

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending December 2013

White Bay Berth 4 Bulk Liquids Handling. Doris Ruby. Ship Noise Monitoring Report. Report Number R58. 1 August 2014

Façade acoustic design strategy Proposed residential development Irvin Avenue, Saltburn

VIII. Noise A. INTRODUCTION B. BACKGROUND

Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise from the main roads in the Trakya region of Turkey

The Role of Acoustics in Curtain Wall Design:

Urban noise and required facade acoustic insulation of buildings: the case of some agglomerations in Italy

Noise at work a guide for health and safety representatives

The IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation

Compliance Noise Monitoring

NOISE IMPACT AND MITIGATION STUDY

The Effects of Ultrasonic Sound Generated by Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems on Human Hearing and Physiology

City of Fontana Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Recirculated Draft EIR

BEDELL CORPORATE TRUSTEES LIMITED AND ATRIUM TRUSTEES LIMITED AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF THE BURTON ROAD UNIT TRUST

Entertainment noise in Western Australia

Noise Design Advice. Noise can be a major factor to consider in any new development.

Aircraft Noise Control at London Luton Airport. August 2015

Weather Briefing for Southeast Texas October 24 th, 2015

The Acoustical Properties of Wool Carpet

Noise from large wind turbines (with focus on low frequencies)

White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Project Document Ref: Rev.1 PINS Ref: EN10048

1.0 TECHNICAL TERMS: Re: NOISE STUDY FOR FOSTER RANCH SHOOTING RANGE. dba. acoustical consulting services

Acoustic and Visual Impacts of a 0.25 MW WTG at Huasai, Nakhon Si Thammarat in Southern Thailand

Non-responsiveness of conventional measures of road traffic noise to an urban truck restriction strategy

This document addresses each of the First Tier noise sources, the proposed solutions and expected completion dates.

TWO WAYS TO DERIVE DESIGN TARGETS FOR NOISE EMISSION

Building Design for Advanced Technology Instruments Sensitive to Acoustical Noise

Basic Concepts of Sound. Contents: Definitions db Conversion Sound Fields db ± db

Acoustics of indoor sports halls and gymnasia

Noise sentinel a proactive approach to noise management in mining operations at BHP Billiton Worsley Alumina Pty Ltd

Program No Section Heading Page # 6.0 Monitoring Training Audiometric Testing Noise Exposure Control 6

NOISE EVALUATION IN A RACE-TRACK: MEASUREMENTS, SOFTWARE ANALYSES AND NEED OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING. COMPARISON AMONG THE RESULTS.

Cloud computing for noise monitoring

Food Truck Consulting Study of Proposed Food Truck Regulations

Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Data Analysis:

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Regulation

UNITED WATER LEAK DETECTION SERVICE

Devonport EfW CHP Facility. CEMP Proposal for Non Destructive Testing Activities. 1. Introduction

Noise Pollution in an Open Office. A Project. Presented to. Dr. Jim Clauson. California State University Dominguez Hills.

Retrofit structural insulated panels (SIPs) increase sound transmission loss of existing single family houses impacted by highway noise

ATSB RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT ROAD SAFETY. Characteristics of Fatal Road Crashes During National Holiday Periods

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the BAA consultation on Noise insulation and mitigation.

THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES, 2000

APPLICATION FOR THE TRANSFER, RENEWAL AND VARIATION OF A PUBLIC ENTERTAINMENT LICENCE FOR THE QUINDELL GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, WHITELEY, FAREHAM

SUITE 6/63 STUD ROAD, BAYSWATER VIC 3153

Planning Statement. Project Prince William School, Oundle. Prepared for Lend Lease

Acoustic Terms, Definitions and General Information

2015 Climate Review for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Odalys Martínez-Sánchez

SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS REPORT

An Installers Guide to

Helicopter Noise Study Results

Environmental Noise Assessment. Proposed Retail Development. Bacchus Marsh Road, Corio. Report Number #R2.

S-822. Noise and Hearing Conservation RISK MANAGEMENT

The characteristics of fatal road accidents during the end of year festive period

Environmental Management System

Re: Wildwood, 2-6 High Street, Kingston, KT1 1EY - Proposed Restaurant - External Plant Noise Assessment - Revised

Exposure to high noise levels from your own and others work activities can cause incurable damage to your hearing

City of Charlotte Noise Ordinance

Permitted Development Rights: Non-Domestic Solar Panels and Domestic Air Source Heat Pumps Consultation

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

This chapter presents

World Health Organization Guidelines on Community Noise

The States of Jersey Department for. Health & Social Services. Health Protection Public Health Services. 4.1 Noise Control Policy and Procedure

Leigh Park Area Safety Scheme, Havant, Hampshire

Risk and Compliance Statement 2015

Miami Science Museum DoE Modelling Grant. Light Planning. 19 December 2008 Concept Design

Central London ongestion charging

Chapter 7 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 AUTHORITY FOR ELEMENT 7.3 NOISE DEFINITIONS

INTER-NOISE DECEMBER 2006 HONOLULU, HAWAII, USA

HP switch LP switch Discharge thermo Comp. Surface thermo

8 Ways to Boost User Protection With the Jabra LINK 85 Audio Processor

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

Sound Quality Aspects for Environmental Noise. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events

Administrative Assistant Income Tax/Assessing

EXPLANATION OF WEATHER ELEMENTS AND VARIABLES FOR THE DAVIS VANTAGE PRO 2 MIDSTREAM WEATHER STATION

Principal: Professor Robert Jackson* Forensic Experts in Water, Construction & the Environment

Lapage Primary School & Nursery Physical Education and School Sport

Halton Borough Council. Markets Charging Policy

Technical Support Document For The May 2, 2008 Exceptional Event

MLD: Domestic Maritime Transport Project

Traffic Accidents Trends and Characteristics in Jordan

THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015

Construction Noise Management Guideline for Major Transport Infrastructure Projects

Antecedent Conditions:

Aircraft noise effects on health

FLOOD RISK RECENT TRENDS AND POLICY RESPONSES

Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Texas State Operations Center

LICENSING AND APPEALS COMMITTEE

NOISE MONITORING RESULTS. For The. Proposed Helistop. Adventist Hinsdale Hospital. 120 North Oak Hinsdale, IL 60521

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT BOMEN INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY BOMEN. WAGGA WAGGA

Noise. CIH Review PDC March 2012

Acoustic expectations, health effects, and design techniques in the urban environment

How To Limit Noise From An Airport During The Summer

The results of hum studies in the United States

Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, Consolidated for Convenience Only

Transcription:

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL AMBIENT SOUND MONITORING NETWORK Annual Report For 2011 Produced by Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit Roads and Traffic Department, Dublin City Council Contact: Ph. 01 2223847; E-mail: noisemaps@dublincity.ie www.dublincity.ie

Page 2 of 92

Table of Contents Page List of figures 5 Introduction 7 Monitoring Sites 7 Measurement Parameters 8 Sound Sources 8 Compliance with Guidelines 9 Measurements Results 11 Daily Summary Charts 15 Monthly Summary Charts 23 Contact Information: Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit Block 2, Floor 6, Civic Offices, Wood Quay. Dublin 8 Phone: 00353 1 2223847 E-Mail: brian.mcmanus@dublincity.ie www.dublincity.ie Page 3 of 92

Page 4 of 92

List of Figures Page Figure 1: Sound Monitoring Sites 7 Figure 2: Comparison of Network Averages 9 Figure 3: Average Yearly Values at each site for 2011 10 Figure 4: Average yearly values at each site for 2010 10 Figure 8: Comparison between mean wind speed & sound levels 11 Figure 5: Differences in sound levels between 2010 & 2011 12 Figure 7: Network Daily Variations for 2011 13 Figure 6: Comparison of daily Lden values 13 Page 5 of 92

Page 6 of 92

Introduction This is the third Annual Report for the Dublin Ambient Sound Monitoring Network. Dublin City Council commenced the installation of a permanent ambient sound monitoring network in 2009. Again in 2011 an additional monitor was placed in Blessington Basin at the top of Blessington St. This is in order to assess whether this small park could be designated as a Quiet Area under the Action Plan relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Currently the monitoring network composes of 12 sites. It is anticipated that there will be further expansion of the network in 2012, subject to site availability. The purpose of the network is to measure outdoor ambient sound levels in the City, at sites which are representative of typical sound levels to which citizens are being exposed. Fig. 1 Sound Monitoring Sites - It should be noted that the sound level meters are located so that there is no single dominant source such as major roads, road junctions, industrial sources etc. having a significant influence on the outdoor ambient sound levels being measured. The network currently consists of 12 monitoring locations with 11 being reported on this year. Ashtown, off Navan Rd. D7, Private House Millmount Avenue, D9, Drumcondra Library Ballyfermot Road, D10, Civic Centre Percy French Road, D12, Walkinstown Ballymun Road, D11, Library Library Bull Island, D3, Interpretative Centre Ringsend, D4, Irishtown Stadium Chapelizod Road, D8, Dublin City Council Rowing Club Woodstock Gardens, Ranelagh, D6, Snr. Citizens Residential Scheme Howth Road, D5, Raheny Library Chancery Park, Public Park, Dublin 1 Blessington Basin, Blessington St, D1. Page 7 of 92

Measurement Parameters The European Commission requires the use of a parameter called the Lden (Sound Level for Day, Evening and Night) in population exposure assessment. This measurement parameter of Dayevening-night level is a descriptor of average sound levels over a whole day with the addition of a penalty of 5 db(a) for evening sound (i.e. 19.00-23.00) and a penalty of 10 db(a) for night time sound (23.00-7.00). Lden has been put forward as a single value parameter for the quantification of annoyance caused by noise. The monitoring network measures continuously, 5 minute parcels of sound right throughout the year. These periods of 5 minute sound levels are then converted and presented as average hourly sound levels in decibels (db(a)). This enables the compilation of day, evening, night, and Lden statistics. Sound Sources Work carried out by Dublin City Council on computer modelled noise maps has shown that traffic is one of the dominant sound sources in Dublin. This sound comes from two aspects of traffic the road surface i.e. wheel\tyre interface where sound levels increase with speed and secondly, engine\ gear change and body rattle sound, normally observed at lower speeds. Whilst measurements at the monitoring locations are influenced by traffic generated sounds the monitors are located so that the measurements are not totally dominated by this source. The aim is to measure total ambient sound without one source dominating another. So whilst the location at Chancery Park to the side of the Four Courts, is close to the Luas Red Line, measurements will include sound from the LUAS, sound from traffic on the Quays, sound from deliveries to the Markets area and sound from activities in the park itself. As this location is close to residential properties it gives a good representation of the overall sound, that people in that area are being exposed to throughout the year. The second dominant sound source is the weather. It may be stating the obvious, but the sound levels at the monitoring sites become elevated once there is an increase in wind speed and\or a heavy rain showers. This can be seen from the measurements at the Bull Island site which is heavily influenced by wind and wave sounds. It is therefore important to understand that an increase in sound levels over a particular period may not necessarily mean an increase in noise levels noise being defined as unwanted sound. Having said that, the weekly and monthly measurements demonstrate regular and repeating sound patterns. This can only be as a result of manmade sound emissions. The site locations are displayed on maps to the rear of this report and give an indication as to the type of area they are situated in. Bull Island, again this year, tends to be the most erratic site in that there is no readily discernable pattern to the measured levels. As already stated, this site would be impacted more by the time of the tides and weather rather than sounds from traffic and human activity. Page 8 of 92

Data Loss Loss of data is mainly due to the drifting of the calibration of the microphones or power failure at a site. Data which could not be verified with a correct calibration was discarded. There was no instance of vandalism at any of the sites this year, but birds did manage to pull asunder the foam wind shields from two microphone assemblies. This resulted in the discarding of data at those sites during the periods without a wind shield. Guidelines\ Standards for exposure to Ambient Sound levels Sound emission criteria for certain sources, outside of the work environment, can be applied and enforced through Integrated Pollution Prevention Control licences, Planning Control, or Section 107-108 of the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992. There are no legally binding statutory limits for ambient sound levels, similar to currently existing air quality standards. However the levels outlined below are used for guidance and comparison purposes. Areas with desirable\undesirable or high\low sound levels The Dublin City Council Noise Action Plan Oct 2008-Nov2013 proposes that areas with undesirable high sound levels are areas with a night time sound level greater than 55 decibels and a daytime level greater than 70 decibels. Areas with desirably low sound levels are defined as areas with a night time level less than 50 decibels and\or a daytime level less than 55 decibels. The World Health Organisation Night Noise Guidelines (NNGL) for Europe These guidelines propose a Night Noise Guideline (NNGL) Lnight for outside = 40 db; Interim target (IT) Lnight, outside = 55 db. Summary Results Fig.2 Page 9 of 92

Summary Results contd. The measurements for the year 2011 indicate that only one of the locations Ballymun, marginally exceeded the undesirable values of 55dB night\70db day, with a night time value of 55.3dB(A). This was an increase of 0.5 of a decibel on 2010. Six of the sites, this year again, met the desirable criteria for night time levels (Drumcondra, Raheny, Ringsend, Bull Island, Walkinstown, Ranelagh). The overall Network Average also met the desirable night time level with a value of 50dB (A). Four sites - a decrease from seven in 2010, met the desirable value for daytime, (Ringsend, Bull Island, Walkinstown, Woodstock Gdns\Ranelagh). The Network Average of 55.5dB(A) was just 0.5dB outside the desirable daytime value. All of the sites except Ballymun met the WHO NNGL interim target for exterior night time level of 55dB(A). Set out in fig.2 is a comparison of the Network averages for 2009, 2010 and 2011. Figures 3&4 display more detail for the individual sites. The 2011 Network yearly average figures show 1.4-2dB change on year 2010. Fig.3 Fig.4 Page 10 of 92

Measurement Results The ambient sound monitoring network measures all sound from all sources thus giving an indication of the amount of sound the general population is exposed to from the hustle and bustle of daily life. Although alluded to previously, it is worth stating again that the ambient sound monitoring network measures sound levels in decibels (db(a)). It does not measure noise. Noise is usually defined as "unwanted sound". "Noise" and "sound" are often erroneously interchanged. However Noise Annoyance, is a term generally used for all negative feelings such as disturbance, dissatisfaction, displeasure, irritation and nuisance (Guski 1999, Quis, 2002). Adverse effects of noise occur when intended activities of the individual are disturbed. The sound level of the acoustic stimulus, the time of its occurrence, its time domain, its frequency spectrum and its informational content modify the reaction. During sleep, however, unconscious activation of the autonomous system takes place without cognitive control, due to direct interaction between the hearing nerve and higher structures of the central nervous system. Noise indicators such as Lden and Lnight, in this respect, describe the exposure situation. (Dr. Wolfgang Babisch, Expert Panel on Noise, EEA). It is now apparent form the three years of continuous measurements that traffic is one of the dominant sound sources at most sites. Hourly sound values shadow traffic volumes as they vary throughout the day. As already mentioned, weather also has an important influence on sound measurements. The drop in sound levels towards the end of 2010 was due to snow falls( Fig. 6), whilst the higher sound levels over the same period in 2011 were due to rain and wind - On October 23rd/24th, a slow moving frontal depression resulted in high rainfall totals, mainly in the east and southeast, attributing to Autumn 2011 s relatively wet conditions. A third to nearly a half of the monthly rainfall in the east was recorded during this event -Met Office. There is a striking Fig.8 similarity between the average monthly wind speeds and average monthly sound levels for 2011 - see Fig. 8. The increase in overall sound levels in 2011, particularly at some exposed locations, is thought to be due to the increase mean wind speeds. Mean wind speeds were above normal for 2011(Met office). Also, there were 81 days with gale gust in 2011 against 32 days in 2010. Figure 6 illustrates a comparison of the networks daily Lden values between 2009, 2010 and 2011. Comparison of the Network Lden over the past three years shows 2011 values more in line with 2009 rather than 2010. On an individual site by site comparison, all sites, except Chancery Park, show an increase in sound levels, with the largest increase at Bull Island and Walkinstown. At these sites sound values increased by an average 4.5 and 3.9 decibels respectively on 2010 figures. Page 11 of 92

Again this year, Ballymun is the site with the highest Lden values, followed by the new site at Chancery Park a City Centre location. Difference between 2011 and 2010 values (Minus values in db(a), indicate a decrease on 2010) As can be seen from figure 5, the Network average difference between the Lden values for years 2010 and 2011 is approximately two decibel. The extent of this increase would not be noticeable to the general public. And again it is not conclusive that this could lead to increase nuisance or annoyance as it is more likely due to weather conditions. Generally a three decibel reduction\increase would just barely be noticed. Fig. 5 The Bull Island site displays the largest increase in sound levels. From the shape of the Average Daily charts it could be inferred that the sound sources at this site are non anthropogenic in nature. Walkinstown shows the next highest increase. It is though that pipe laying operations and road works close to the monitoring site may have influenced sound levels for a significant portion of the year. Chancery Park was the only site to indicate a decrease in sound levels. It is thought this is due to the availability of a full year s monitoring results as opposed to the last 3 months of 2010 upon which that year s annual figures were based. Page 12 of 92

Variation of Sound Levels The site summaries Average LAeq (sound levels) provide a more detailed view of how sound levels vary from hour to hour throughout the average day and between the different days of the week. During the average day sound levels (along with traffic levels) start rising at 6 a.m. After approximately 9 a.m. sounds levels at most sites, level off until 9pm when they start to fall. It is interesting to note as with previous years, early Saturday and Sunday morning sound levels are higher than the same periods during the week. The peak Fig.7 sound levels on weekend mornings arise between ten and eleven a.m. It is thought these differences are due to different social activities at these times with less traffic on the road on late Saturday and Sunday mornings and more traffic coming from late night social events early Saturday and Sunday mornings. There was no apparent difference between the days of the week in relation to which had the highest sound levels as opposed to last year where Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursdays, were similarly highest. The average lowest sound levels are recorded on Sundays. The top three sites with the lowest daytime sound values were Woodstock Gardens, Bull Island and Ringsend. The top three sites with the highest daytime sound values were Ballymun, Chancery St. and Ballyfermot the same as last year. The sites with the lowest night time sound values were Woodstock Gardens, Walkinstown and Bull Island. The sites Fig.6 with the highest night time sound values were, Ballymun, Chancery Park and Navan Road. The Monthly Charts to the rear of this report present a detailed view of how average daily sound levels change from day to day and month to month. In 2011, the Network s highest average monthly sound levels were experienced at most stations in October, November and December. In 2010 September and February were the months with the highest average sound levels Page 13 of 92

Page 14 of 92

Average Daily Summary Charts Page 15 of 92

Page 16 of 92

BALLYMUN CHAPELIZOD Page 17 of 92

NAVAN RD. BALLYFERMOT Page 18 of 92

DRUMCONDRA RAHENY Page 19 of 92

RINGSEND BULL ISLAND Page 20 of 92

WALKINSTOWN RANELAGH Page 21 of 92

CHANCERY PARK NETWORK Page 22 of 92

Monthly Summary Charts Page 23 of 92

Page 24 of 92

BALLYFERMOT CIVIC CENTRE BALLYFERMOT ROAD DUBLIN 10 Page 25 of 92

Page 26 of 92

Page 27 of 92

Page 28 of 92

Page 29 of 92

Page 30 of 92

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL ROWING CLUB CHAPELIZOD ROAD DUBLIN 8 Page 31 of 92

Page 32 of 92

Page 33 of 92

Page 34 of 92

Page 35 of 92

Page 36 of 92

ASHTOWN GROVE NAVAN ROAD DUBLIN 7 Page 37 of 92

Page 38 of 92

Page 39 of 92

Page 40 of 92

Page 41 of 92

Page 42 of 92

BALLYMUN LIBRARY BALLYMUN ROAD DUBLIN 11 Page 43 of 92

Page 44 of 92

Page 45 of 92

Page 46 of 92

Page 47 of 92

Page 48 of 92

DRUMCONDRA LIBRARY MILLMOUNT AVENUE DUBLIN 9 Page 49 of 92

Page 50 of 92

Page 51 of 92

Page 52 of 92

Page 53 of 92

Page 54 of 92

RAHENY LIBRARY HOWTH ROAD DUBLIN 5 Page 55 of 92

Page 56 of 92

Page 57 of 92

Page 58 of 92

Page 59 of 92

Page 60 of 92

IRISHTOWN SPORTS CENTRE RINGSEND DUBLIN 4 Page 61 of 92

Page 62 of 92

Page 63 of 92

Page 64 of 92

Page 65 of 92

Page 66 of 92

BULL ISLAND INTERPRETATIVE CENTRE BULL ISLAND DUBLIN 3 Page 67 of 92

Page 68 of 92

Page 69 of 92

Page 70 of 92

Page 71 of 92

Page 72 of 92

WALKINSTOWN LIBRARY PERCY FRENCH ROAD DUBLIN 12 Page 73 of 92

Page 74 of 92

Page 75 of 92

Page 76 of 92

Page 77 of 92

Page 78 of 92

WOODSTOCK STOCK GARDENS RANELAGH DUBLIN 6 Page 79 of 92

Page 80 of 92

Page 81 of 92

Page 82 of 92

Page 83 of 92

Page 84 of 92

CHANCERY PARK CHANCERY ST. DUBLIN 1 Page 85 of 92

Page 86 of 92

Page 87 of 92

Page 88 of 92

Page 89 of 92

Page 90 of 92

Page 91 of 92

www.dublincity.ie Page 92 of 92