LOWER NORTH OUTFALL SEWER AND NORTH OUTFALL SEWER REHABILITATION USING AMERON S T HAB METHOD



Similar documents
CONSTRUCTION OF NON-CIRCULAR SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECTS IN LOS ANGELES

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF SEWER MAINS

NON-CIRCULAR SEWER LINER INSTALLATION AND FUTURE PROJECTS IN LOS ANGELES

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEWER PIPE AND LINING INSERTION - TRENCHLESS; GENERAL GUIDELINES (As Provided by NASSCO)

Storm Sewer Trenchless Upgrade Alternatives and Recommendations

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO SLIP-LINING SANITARY SEWERS

Rehabilitation or Replacement? That Is The Question

Sewer Rehabilitation Design Requirements

CHALLENGES IN LINING A 100 YR OLD BRICK SEWER

Wastewater Capital Projects Management Standard Construction Specification

FY11 Sanitary Sewer Main Rehab and Point Repair Bid Tabulation

SECTION XXXXXX TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS FOR MANHOLES, WETWELLS, AND OTHER SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES

Coast Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project for the Orange County Sanitation District

FY08 SEWER POINT REPAIRS BID TABULATION

Panel Lok Pipe Renovation System Danby LLC (formerly Danby of North America, Inc.) Waterfront Mall - 90 Diameter Rehabilitation

Sewer Pipe Lining An Economic Solution for Pipe Rehabilitation By Tawana Albany Nicholas, Virgin Islands Waste Management Authority

Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Regional Drainage Policies - Volume 2 New Development

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO POINT REPAIRS AND OBSTRUCTION REMOVALS

53.03 MATERIALS FOR SEWER LINER PIPE AND FITTINGS: The following materials are approved for installation in sanitary sewer lines:

SECTION 807 PUMP STATION REHABILITATION

SECTION POINT REPAIRS TO SANITARY SEWERS. A. Repairs to existing sewer lines by replacing short lengths of failed pipe.

PROVIDING THE SAFE CHOICE FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE RENEWAL, INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT AND ASSET RELIABILITY

Wastewater Collection System Supplemental Design Standards for Capital Improvement Program Projects

Utilizing Remaining Useful Life for Asset Management of Critical Wastewater Assets

San Antonio, TX July 28, 2011

CITY OF BEVERLY RULES AND REGULATIONS - SEWER SYSTEM TESTING. General

Rehabilitation of an Aging Concrete Reservoir Adit Tower

March 2006 DIVISION 3 - CW 2140-R3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Before H 2 Town of South Windsor, CT Evaluates Large Diameter Concrete Pipe

Section 2100-Trenching and Tunneling

See Appendix A for additional information, or contact ASTM directly.

AIR RELEASE, CLEANOUT, AND SEWER MANHOLES

BUILDING OVER OR NEAR WATER & SEWER MAINS POLICY

REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT? THAT IS THE QUESTION

WEFTEC.06. Kent Von Aspern,* Collins Orton** *Carollo Engineers 2700 Ygnacio Valley Rd Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94598

SECTION 6 SANITARY SEWER MAIN 6.01 SCOPE

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF WATER MAINS. A. Conform to requirements of Section Submittals.

Meeting the Challenge of Pipeline Emergency Repair

SECTION CEMENT-MORTAR LINED AND COATED STEEL PIPE

SEWER BACKUPS & BASEMENT FLOODING PREVENTATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR THE BUILDING OWNER

SECTION GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS

ATTACHMENT 3: SPECIFICATION FOR SEWER CLEANING

Rehabilitation Alternatives. MWEA Collection System Seminar October 1, 2009

CCU Engineering Specifications. Section PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS

Special Specification 7021 Water Main and Sewer Line Replacements

Waste Management. Infrastructure Rehabilitation in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Force Main Condition Assessment: New Technologies & Case Studies

SECTION STORM DRAIN SYSTEM

SECTION 812 SEWER LINE, MANHOLE AND WET WELL CLEANING

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

Section 402. STORM SEWERS

Module 3 : Sewer Material. Lecture 3 : Sewer Material

Use of a Reinforced Jet Grout Excavation Support System for a Major Sewer Line Repair

SECTION NONREINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE

Platte River Interceptor Slipline Rehabilitation

SEWER CLEANING, INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT

A. Contractor shall furnish, to the Engineer, all materials certifications available from the manufacturer for all required materials.

Collection Systems Technology Fact Sheet Sewers, Conventional Gravity

External Wrapping of Steel Riser Pipe. Case Study HJ3 CS200902

INSTALLATION OF INSITUFORM LINER

812-3 LIMITATIONS: b. No fire hydrant shall be obstructed or used when there is a fire in the area.

SECTION 3 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN

Beacon Hill Sewer District Standard Specifications

Module 3: Sewer Material Lecture 3: Sewer Material

SPR PE Steel Reinforced Liner

SECTION REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

High Density Polyethylene Liners for Rehabilitation of Corroded Pipelines

Precast Manhole Sections and Castings. These items shall conform to Section 31, "Storm Drain Installation," of these Standard Provisions.

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY

TECHNICAL NOTE Culvert Sliplining and Lining of Casings with HPPipe

SECTION 21 REHABILITATION OF SANITARY SEWER MAINS BY THE PIPE BURSTING AND TRENCHLESS PIPE REPLACEMENT METHOD

1.3.2 Method of construction and restoration of existing water service connections. This shall include:

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO. 854 SANITARY SEWER LATERALS

Section SEWER PIPE INSTALLATION AND TESTING

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM 866 SEWER MAIN TELEVISION INSPECTION

Session: HDPE Pipe Test Rafael Ortega, Vice President, Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam

Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency. Sewer System Management Plan

Sewer Line Rehabilitation

SECTION 810 SEWER LINE CLEANING

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Manhole, Frame, and Cover Installation (includes Drop Manhole) Additional Manhole Depth

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

SECTION BUILDING SEWERS. B. Connection of building sanitary drainage system to municipal sewers.

CW GRAVITY SEWERS TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Annular Space Grouting of Slipline Products

VOLUME V GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN CONSULTANT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX B: MASTER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND PREPARATION GUIDE, DIVISIONS 0-10

SECTION 1 UTILITY OVERVIEW, INTRODUCTION, and PROJECT BACKGROUND

SECTION LS 2530 SANITARY SEWERS. A. General: Submit the following in accordance with The General Conditions.

SECTION PRECAST CONCRETE UTILITY STRUCTURES

SIDE SEWER CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION INSTALLATION OF GRAVITY SEWER PIPELINES. 1. Trenching, Backfilling and Compacting: 02223

Specification for Pipe Bursting Gravity Sewer Mains with HDPE Pipe

LOWELL REGIONAL WASTEWATER UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LOWELL MA CONCRETE FLOODWALL REPAIRS

SECTION 36 - CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PIPE (CIPCP) TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 6 - SANITARY SEWER

Transcription:

www.norcalpug.com LOWER NORTH OUTFALL SEWER AND NORTH OUTFALL SEWER REHABILITATION USING AMERON S T HAB METHOD Bob Fisher and Lance Stracner Ameron Protective Lining J.R. Pipeline Co Inc. Abstract: The City of Los Angeles sewer tunnel infrastructure is in need of major repairs. The NOS was constructed in the early 1900 s. At that time, the newest materials to combat sewer gases and corrosion was a ceramic tile lining. However, the sewer gases were still able to penetrate and degrade the grout in between the tiles causing them to fail. The tile and sections of the concrete of the tunnel are now failing and collapsing to the tunnel floor. The method that was selected for the project had to structurally rehabilitate the tunnel and protect the new concrete from future corrosion. The City of Los Angeles awarded two contracts to complete the sewer tunnel rehabilitation. Phase I rehabilitated 30,512 LF of the Lower North Outfall Sewer (LNOS) and Phase II rehabilitated 16,876 LF of the North Outfall Sewer (NOS). Colich/J.R. Pipeline Joint Venture (JV) was the low bidder on each project and selected Amerons T Hab method for rehabilitating the sewer tunnel. The concrete used in the process was a 4000psi self consolidating concrete designed by J.R. Pipeline, Cemex, and Grace Materials. Introduction: The City of Los Angeles North Outfall Sewer (NOS) and the Lower North Outfall Sewer (LNOS) were constructed in the 1900 s. The NOS begins as a 48 concrete pipe and increases in size up to a 10 6 tunnel as it passes through the downtown area. The NOS was the first large diameter sewer tunnel completed in the City of Los Angeles. It collects the wastewater from all the downtown sewer systems, transporting it to the Hyperion Sewer Treatment Plant. Rehabilitating the LNOS Phase I was the first phase of the City s master plan to rehabilitate the large sections of the NOS wastewater system. The sewer was originally constructed with ceramic tiles to protect the concrete from sewer gases. However, the mortar used to install the tiles corroded and failed causing the tiles to fall off of the tunnel exposing the concrete beneath. This concrete over the next 70 years eroded to a point of failure. In 1992 the City of Los Angeles constructed the North Outfall Relief Sewer (NORS) to divert the wastewater from the NOS. This allowed Figure 1 Original NOS Construction in 1920's 1

time for the City of Los Angeles Engineers to design an appropriate rehabilitation method with the lasted in rehabilitation technologies. Design Requirement: In designing the rehabilitation for the LNOS Phase I the City of Los Angeles designers disregarded the integrity of the existing concrete due to its level of unknown corrosion. The rehabilitation involved casting a new PVC liner inside the existing sewer tunnel. The City had approved three PVC liners for the rehabilitation, Ameron T Lock, Agru CIP Liner, and Anjac Doran Conplast. The Concrete specified was 4000psi, self consolidating, and shrinkage reduced. The new cast in place concrete section had a minimum thickness of 9 at the invert and 12 at the soffit. The NOS Phase II rehabilitation design accepted the structural integrity of the existing sewer tunnel. This allowed the City to reduce the new cast in place concrete section. The City required hydro demolition to remove all the corrosion and expose sound grey concrete to prepare the existing surface of the tunnel. Local sewer flows had to be bypassed and a new 72 sewer diversion constructed. Two brick siphon structures were rehabilitated, three 78 concrete siphon barrels were rehabilitated, 13 maintenance holes were rehabilitated, and 5 new maintenance hole were constructed. Figure 2 Cross Section of New CIP Liner 2

Project Construction Phase The first phase was the LNOS Phase I Rehabilitation which began in July of 2004 and finished in April of 2007. The LNOS was 30,512 lineal feet of 10 6 clay tile lined tunnel. The rehabilitation consisted of 12 inches of new self consolidating concrete and Amerons T Hab PVC liner. The rehabilitation required cleaning of the exiting sewer tunnel, surface preparation, and sewer bypassing. The second phase was the NOS Phase II Rehabilitation. This phase began in March of 2007 and will finish in February 2010. The NOS Phase II was 10,929 Lineal feet of 10 6 semi elliptical clay tile lined tunnel and 5,945 lineal feet of 7 9 semi elliptical clay tile lined tunnel. The rehabilitation consisted of 6 to 9 inches of new self consolidating concrete and Amerons T Hab PVC liner. Debris Removal Access pits were constructed at City designated locations. These were spaced approximately 10,000 lineal feet apart. The initial cleaning removed all the debris that had built up within the sewer tunnel. The debris ranged in depth from 6 to 24 in some areas. The LNOS Phase I had 4 steel ribs installed on a previous contract to shore up the collapsing sewer tunnel. The ribs were very corroded and degraded. The debris consisted of clay tile, degraded concrete, steel ribs, and sewer sludge. The debris was collected within the tunnel with a skidsteer loader and transported to the access point where it was removed and placed into covered 20yd roll off containers. The containers were staged and allowed to dewater prior to disposal. All of the debris was recycled at a local material recycle facility. Figure 3 Existing steel ribs in LNOS 3

Sewer Bypass and Diversions The City of Los Angeles had constructed the North Outfall Relief Sewer (NORS) in 1992 to remove the LNOS Phase I and the NOS Phase II from service. To facilitate the installation of the Ameron T Hab system the local sewer flows had to be contained into a bypass line or diverted to adjacent sewer systems. The LNOS Phase I bypass required two 8 submersible pumps and a 12 internal bypass pipeline to control the main sewer flows. The main flows were diverted up to one mile internally along the tunnel invert to a diversion structure and discharged into an adjacent wastewater system. The local 8 flows were collected and bypass internally along a gravity 6 and 8 bypass pipeline. One 18 force main was re piped to an alternate wastewater system at the upstream project limits. The NOS Phase II project required a large sewer diversion to allow rehabilitation of the uppermost reaches of the sewer tunnel. The sewer diversion consisted of micro tunneling 204 lineal feet of 72 Hobas Pipe USA and the construction of one sewer junction structure over the 11 diameter East Coastal Interceptor Sewer (ECIS) and one sewer diversion structure over the La Cienega San Fernando Valley Relief Sewer (LCSFVRS). The diversion removed approximately 17 MGD from the NOS system. The structures were both 50 deep excavations solid shored with steel beam and plates. The new structures were cast in place concrete with Ameron s T Lock Lining for protection. Nada Pacific performed the 72 micro tunnel. The local sewer flows were collected and bypass internally along gravity 8 bypass line. Surface Preparation Figure 4 Before and After Surface Preparation Once the sewer diversions were operational and the tunnel was cleaned of all debris, the surface of the tunnel had to be prepared to receive the new concrete liner. The LNOS Phase I specified pressure washing with 3000psi water. The JV modified standard diesel powered pressure washing equipment to be used inside the tunnel. Pressure washing removed all the loose and deleterious materials from the surface of the tunnel walls. However, it does not remove the corrosion on the immediate surface of the concrete. This was verified by a low PH test reading on the interior tunnel surface. The NOS Phase II contract required hydro demolition to the existing concrete surface. (Figure4) Because of the thinner concrete section, the design engineer wanted clean sound concrete exposed with a PH of 7 or greater for accurate bonding with the new concrete. This was achieved by hydro blasting the surface with 18,000psi water. The work was subcontracted to National Infrastructure Hydro Demolition from Vancouver Canada. 4

Installation of Ameron T Lock PVC Liner The JV in conjunction with Everest Equipment designed and built steel tunnel forms for both projects. The forms included a starter wall section, arch section, and a form carrier. The carrier strips, relocates, and sets up the arch form sections. The starter wall was stripped and relocated by hand. The process begins with the installation of a 14 starter wall section lined with Ameron PVC. (Figure 5) The starter wall allows for vertical room to setup and strip the Figure 5 Starter Wall Forms arch section of formwork. The starter wall was cast 100 lineal feet ahead of the arch section to allow curing time. The connection between the starter wall and the invert of the tunnel was accomplished with #5 316LN stainless steel rebar at 18 O.C. doweled in 5 and affixed with Sika Dur Hi Mod Epoxy. The thickness of the starter wall section varied between 6 to 9 dependent upon the level of corrosion and the accuracy of the original construction in maintaining the designed internal measurements. The arch section of formwork is set up after the starter wall section has 24 hours of cure time. The form carrier mobilizes the arch sections into place. (Figure 6) The Ameron T Lock PVC is applied and secured onto the formwork. The crews then adjust the formwork to finalize the set up and meet the contract dimensions. (Figure 2) Once the forms are in place the carrier is moved out of the way to allow the concrete slick line and grout port connections to be assembled.(figure 7) The form is then filled with 4000psi self consolidating concrete. The concrete mix was designed with the help from Cemex and Grace Materials. The concrete mix includes four additives to meet the specification requirements and allow for the pumping of long distances as well as maintaining its consolidation within the form sections. The quality control for the concrete was measured by weight and a J Ring spread of 21 to 23. (Figure 8) Due to the limited access points the City granted the request to allow the existing and new manhole to be used for concrete pumping operations. The manholes were spaced approximately 1,000 to 2,000 lineal feet apart. Therefore our typical pumping distance was between 500 and 1,000 lineal feet to the formwork. In one case due to the terrain the manholes were 4,000 lineal feet apart. This required a pumping distance of 2,000 lineal feet to the formwork. The concrete then had to flow 100 lineal feet within the formwork. The self consolidating concrete performed as expected with good consolidation and Figure 6 Form Carrier with Arch Forms 5

strength. After an eighteen hour cure the forms are stripped and relocated to the next section. The Ameron T Lock installation is completed by welding all the seams with 1 PVC weld strip. (Figure 9) The Ameron T lock PVC is test by the City for any defects using a 10,000 volt holiday detector. The final result is a newly restored sewer ready for service. (Figure 10) The LNOS Phase I was complete on time and NOS Phase II was completed 10 months ahead of schedule. Figure 7 Formwork with Grout Lines Figure 8 J Ring Test 4,000psi SCC with 22" Spread Figure 9 PVC Welding of all Seams 6

Figure 5 Complete Rehabilitation with Ameron T Hab The City of Los Angeles considered these projects a great success due to the limited impact on the local residents and neighboring cities. The restoration of the LNOS Phase I and NOS Phase II expanded the City s wastewater capacity to a level that they have never seen. The service life of the newly rehabilitated sewers is estimated to be over 100 years. Description LNOS Phase I NOS Phase II Total Tunnel Lineal Footage 30,512 LF 16,876 LF 47,388 LF Debris Remove 7,000 Tons 5000 Tons 12,000 Tons Concrete Placed 35,000 yds 13,500 yds 48,500 yds Ameron T Lock Installed 854,336 sqft 421,768 sqft 1,276,104 sqft Table 1 The totals of critical points within the projects. 7