ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT ANCHORAGE, ALASKA. ASD MEMORANDUM #186 (2011-2012) March 22, 2012



Similar documents
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) - Construction Management Services. Germantown School District Office

Mechanical Contractor Pre-Qualification Packet. SPSC N180 Computer Data Room Phase II. Project No. CP Notice No. Notice

RESOLUTION NO

Request for Proposal East Tower Nursing Unit and Infrastructure Upgrade Grossmont Hospital

Request for Proposal No. RFP Project Construction Management Services. for. Capital Levy BTA IV Project: Ingraham High School Classroom Addition

Construction Management Services Delmar School District RFP No. DSD16001-CONSTR_MAN

CLAYTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Business Services - Purchasing Department

DOCUMENT NOTICE TO BIDDERS

Los Angeles Community College District PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Terri Mestas Program Director

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Prefacej... 1

Lessons Learned/Best Practices: Case Study- Design-Build at SFO

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR: IT CONSULTANT

CITY COMMISSION LARGO, FLORIDA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR DATA CENTER DESIGN SERVICES. RFQ #: 11-Q-375 DATE: July 8, 2011

Purchases from $750 $1,500 requires 3 Verbal Quotes. Purchases from $1,501 $24,999 requires 3 Written Quotes

How to do Business. with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities.

SERVICE PROVIDER CRITERIA AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT S. Marion Avenue, Mail Station 2015 Lake City, Florida

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Purchasing and Contracts Division Purchasing Policies and Procedures The Competitive Process... 2

Corrected Form: Revised Attachment 7B Cost Proposal Distribution Exhibits A1 and A2 Attached

New WMHS Construction Management Firm

Construction Management At-Risk

FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY Committed to Quality

FIRST AND FINAL ADDENDUM RFP FOR ROOFING SERVICES FOR DISASTER RECOVERY ASSISTANCE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Proposals IT INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION

DGS (VCCS Rev. 04/15) Page 1 of 7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

BOARD OF EDUCATION Attachment: Discussion 10. PALO ALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Date:

Request for Proposal Financial Advisor Services

Ralls County Emergency Services Request for Proposal & Qualifications Emergency Communications Dispatch Consoles

HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE STATE OF ALASKA

Solicitation Information February 26, 2016

Request for Qualifications (CM at Risk Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

Request for Qualifications (Design-Build Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) BID# UPGRADE EXISTING NEXTGEN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEM (EMR/EPM/EDR/KPM)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK (CMAR)

Prosecutorial Case Management System Maintenance/Enhancement Support Services. Request for Proposal: RFP #

Policy Number: Policy Name: Professional Services and Construction Services Procurement

NOTICE OF CONTRACT UPDATE. On Call/As Required Information Technology Consulting Services. MTBW Services, Inc. P:

Oakland Schools / Michigan Works! Job Link Service Center. Workforce Development Hispanic Outreach Services RFP #

Risk Management Division Municipal Manager Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

SERVICE PROVIDER CRITERIA AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

Electrical Contractor Pre-Qualification Packet. CHEM R/R Bus Duct & Generator (DMI) Project No. CP Notice No

Nebraska Public Schools: Statutes Related to the Construction of Improvements to Real Property

DOCUMENT ADDENDA ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) A. Project Name: BHFC New Single Family Dwelling Unit Dahlia Circle

Purchasing and Contracts Request for Proposal Procedure

INVITATION FOR BIDS CCK PROJECT PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE RENOVATION PHASE 3 ADDENDUM #

Among other things, completion of the project will allow expansion at the campus to include 6 th -8 th graders and serve over 1,000 students.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For HEALTH INSURANCE AGENT/BROKER SERVICES. FOR THE Town of Vernon, Connecticut. Contract # /15/2012

TruexCullins Architecture Fairfield Center School Bid Documents Kitchen and Bathroom Renovation March 1, 2015

Request for Qualifications. Owner s Project Manager. Design and Construction of a New School Facility. K~8 Charter School

ATTACHMENT A. Ozarks Technical Community College Pre-Established Criteria for Construction Management and Design Build Construction Projects

Merchant Account Services

UNO CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK ( UNO-CSN ) Invitation for Bids ( IFB ) for ELECTRICAL UPGRADES

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Architectural Consulting Services for a New Automotive Building. Lakes Region Community College, Laconia, NH

Invitation to Bid and Instructions to Bidders (This is Phase I of the project please note on any Bid that it Applies to Phase I only) May 1, 2015

PUBLIC BID LAW CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS. Louisiana Department of Justice James D. Buddy Caldwell, Attorney General

Financial Advisor REQUEST FOR INFORMATION & PROPOSAL

Portland Public Schools Capital Construction Bond. Citizen Accountability Committee. Charter. Background:

SOLICITATION INFORMATION JANUARY 13, 2015 TITLE: INTEGRATED CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Request for Qualifications (CM at Risk Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

CHAPTER 5 SMALL PURCHASES

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2015 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROJECT / PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT

Region 7 Education Service Center Request for Proposal (RFP) For Generator Installation

IV. Orders, Quotations, Bids and Request for Proposal (RFP) Requirements

Request for Qualifications (CM at Risk Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

CITY OF DALLAS. Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal (RFCSP) BUZ1524. For. SCADA Repair, Parts and Support

Request For Proposal. Furnish Schneider Business Park Signs Design Build Services. For the Cibolo Economic Development Corporation Cibolo, Texas

Design-Build Process for Project Managers

Request for Qualifications

Enterprise Scheduler Rev. 0 Bid # Scope of Work

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM AT CONWAY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER CONWAY, SC 29526

Eanes Independent School District

CITY OF RICHMOND DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES RICHMOND, VIRGINIA (804) June 17, 2015

NYS Homes & Community Renewal

Solicitation Information 10 May 2012

Consolidated I&T Data Centre - P3 Canada Fund

School Construction Projects

Transcription:

ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ASD MEMORANDUM #186 (2011-2012) March 22, 2012 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: SCHOOL BOARD OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AWARD OF CONTRACT: IT DATA CENTER MOVE TO KENNEDY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DESIGN BUILD ASD Core Value: The district will be open, transparent and accountable to the public. RECOMMENDATION: It is the Administration s recommendation that the School Board authorize the Superintendent to award a contract for the IT Data Center Move to Kennedy Elementary School Design/Build to Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $2,069,200. PERTINENT FACTS: Background The current ASD Data Center has been housed on the West/Romig campus since 1983. The structure is insufficient to support the technology and staffing requirements of the District. Studies were done in conjunction with the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) resulting in an ASD administrative recommendation to move the Data Center functionality and staff to Kennedy Elementary on Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson with a targeted completion date of July 31, 2012. The major scope of work under this project includes the following: transfer of the existing data center equipment to Kennedy Elementary from the existing data center located at 1602 Hillcrest Drive, Anchorage; installation and setup of new owner furnished equipment, 18 new equipment racks with seismic mounting bases, new cooling units, new 480 volt electrical service to support the server room, new 500 kw standby generator to support the server room equipment,

new uninterrupted power supply (UPS) system to support the server room, new security system with card access for the school and into the server room, a static free floor system, new ceiling and lighting in server room, demolition of one small interior wall with the new server room area, and a pre-action fire sprinkler system for the server room. The completed server room has been designed for expansion to accommodate an additional 20 racks and equipment without the need for additional power and space requirements. Funding On April 18, 2011 the School Board approved funding for the data center move in the amount of $1,766,200 through ASD Memorandum #301 (2010-11). Additionally, in May 2009, the School Board approved capital project funding in the amount of $355,000 for an emergency generator and upgrade of uninterruptible power source (UPS) system for the IT data center through ASD Memorandum #333 (2008-09). These funds were not expended at that time pending the outcome of the decision to re-locate the data center. In order to execute this contract, additional funds are requested through approval of ASD Memorandum #200 (2011-12), Allocation of Capital Projects Funds. The cost to convert Kennedy to the IT Data Center significantly exceeded expectations. The District developed several cost estimates for major elements of the project using several different sources. In light of the recent trend of overestimating construction costs, this under-estimate was unexpected. The District may never fully understand all of the factors that led to the underestimate of this project s costs. It appears that one significant factor was the use by all three offerers of the same sub-contractor for the largest single element of the project. It had been expected that a more robust market for this particular project element would have produced a lower overall project cost. Despite this initial mis-calculation of project cost, the costs of constructing and operating the District s data center at Kennedy are still expected to be the least expensive option available to meet the District s long term functional requirements. 2

Procurement Strategy The District considered several procurement approaches to deliver this project. During the recently completed District-wide IT Network Refurbishment design/build the District requested the contractor, World Wide Technologies, Inc. (WWT) to submit a price proposal to move the IT Data Center to Kennedy Elementary. This would have required a board-approved change order. The Administration determined that this was not a sufficiently attractive price to avoid a competitive procurement. The Administration determined the best procurement solution would be to proceed with the project through the alternate delivery method of design/build. The School Board approved the alternate method of delivery through ASD Memorandum #58 (2011-12). A request for proposal for design services was issued on August 25, 2011 to develop a Design/Build RFP for the IT Data Center Design and Move to Kennedy Elementary School Project. The contract was awarded to GDM, INC. GDM s team consisted of experts from structural, mechanical, electrical, information technology backgrounds, as well as a project cost estimator. The consultant s team worked closely with the District IT department to develop the design/build request for proposal that was issued on January 13, 2012. The District along with their consultant, GDM, INC., held a formal pre-proposal meeting on January 23, 2012 and provided two separate site visits of Hillcrest Data Center and Kennedy Elementary to familiarize the prospective bidders with the project scope. Review of Proposals Three contractors responded to the RFP on February 6, 2012: Iyabak Construction, Dowland Construction Inc. and Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. The technical qualification evaluation committee consisted of seven members; three from the District IT department, one each from the District s Facilities department, the University of Alaska s IT department, the State of Alaska Project Management and Engineering department and one from RSA Engineering. ASD also requested the assistance of the MOA in the review process, but the MOA was unable to participate. The proposals were evaluated on the criteria of the firm s experience, project approach, experience as design/builder for IT projects, project team, scheduling, staging, moving and programming of all data center equipment, and quality control. At the completion of the evaluation, the offerors were ranked in accordance with their total scores. 3

Upon conclusion of the technical evaluations, the Committee forwarded the results to the Purchasing Department. The Purchasing Department opened the cost proposals and tabulated the final rankings in accordance with the RFP procedures. The results are summarized in Attachment B, Evaluation Summary, Initial Scoring. Upon conclusion of the final rankings, it was determined that the project fee significantly exceeded current available funding. In an effort to reduce overall project costs, it was determined that by allowing for a less compressed construction schedule the project costs might be reduced without affecting the scope of the work necessary to complete the project. On February 29, 2012 a request for Best and Final Offers (BAFO) was issued to the three responding offerors. The BAFO extended the substantial and final completion dates of the project by 60 days; clarified certain insurance requirements and replaced the fee proposal form from a lump sum fee to line item fee proposal form to better understand the elements of the project costs. Offerors were advised that the District would re-evaluate only the fee portion of their respective proposals. New fee proposals were received on March 9, 2012. The summary of the final rankings as a result of the BAFO are summarized in Attachment B, Best and Final Offer Scoring. The modifications in the RFP resulted in a reduction in the highest ranking Offeror s fee of $130,500. Award is recommended to Consolidated Enterprises, Inc., as the highest ranking Offeror. Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. is a leading General Contractor in Alaska and their selected subcontractor, World Wide Technology, is a leader and expert in the Information Technology industry. They have presented a credible plan to accomplish a significant amount of work in a short time period and have proposed highly skilled management, engineering and technical personnel to deliver the project. Consolidated Enterprises, Inc., the recommended Offeror, has met the evaluation criteria for a responsible Offeror. Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. has previous experience with the Anchorage School District on Bartlett High School Phase 2C, Administration and Classroom Renovation; Bartlett High School Phase 1 Family Consumer Science; Phase 1, House 2, Phase 2 House 3; and Phase 3 Performing Arts Renovation. World Wide Technology just completed the very successful District Wide IT Network Refurbishment Design Build project in September of 2011. 4

BUDGET SUMMARY Design $ 49,880 Construction $2,069,200 Construction Contingency $100,000 Other Project Costs $497,120 Total Project Funding $2,716,200 CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS Funds Description: (01) General Fund (FY 2010-11) (03) Capital Projects Fund (103911) Systems (00300101) Contributions General Fund (00312701) Bond 2008 Prop 2 (00312801) Bond 2008 Prop 3 (3001010) Contributions General Fund (3128000) Bond 08 P2 Redirection BM200 (3220003) Interest 05A (3010) Contracted Services Administration (5200) Construction Contracts (5470) Capital Equipment Fund Sources: Funding Source Account Code Amount Systems 103911-3010 $ 199,500 Systems 103911-5470 59,822 IT Move to 00300101 24602-5200 888,278 Kennedy IT Move to 00312801 24603-5200 595,000 Kennedy IT Generator 00312701 03907-5200 326,600 Total: $2,069,200 CC/MA/PC/JB/JA/RML/EK/BS Attachments: Attachment A, Abstract of Bids Attachment B, Tabulation of Bids 5

Prepared by: Bruce Shelley, Project Manager Edie Knapp, Acting Construction Manager Rachel Molina Lodoen, Project Support Manager Jan Anderson, Contract Coordinator Jane Berglund, Chief Information Officer Pamela K. Chenier, Director Purchasing/Warehouse Approved by: Michael K. Abbott, Assistant Superintendent, Support Services 6

Attachment A ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ABSTRACT OF PROPOSALS Commodity or Service: IT DATA CENTER MOVE TO KENNEDY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DESIGN/BUILD 2:00 p.m., Anchorage Time Proposals Submitted On: February 6, 2012 Budget Fund: General Fund (01) Number of Request for Proposals Sent: Twenty-Five (25) Number of Responsive Proposals Received: Three (3) Number of Non-Responsive Proposals Received: Zero (0) Anchorage Daily News Advertising Date: January 18, 2012 1:00 p.m., Anchorage Time Pre-proposal Conference Held: January 23, 2012 Addenda Issued: Addendum 1, January 18, 2012 Addendum 2, January 26, 2012 Addendum 3, January 31, 2012 Best and Final Offer Issued: February 29, 2012

ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 4919 Van Buren Street Anchorage, Alaska 99517-3137 EVALUATION SUMMARY INITIAL SCORING Opened: 2:00 p.m. Anchorage Time, February 6, 2012 Proposal: IT Data Center Move to Kennedy Elementary School Design/Build VENDORS 1. Consolidated Enterprises Inc 2. Dowland Construction Inc 3. Iyabak Construction LLC 633 E 81 st Ave 4134 Ingra St Ste 201B 4600 Debarr Rd Ste 200 Anchorage, AK 99515 Anchorage, AK 99503 Anchorage, AK99508 1. Evaluation Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 1 2 3 Firm s Experience 70 57 38 34 Project Approach 91 74.1 44.2 52 Experience as Design/Builder for IT Projects 70 54 33 30 Project Team 49 39.2 30.1 25.2 Scheduling, Staging, Moving, and Programming of All Data Center Equipment 35 28 24 24 Quality Control 28 21.2 21.2 8.8 Fee 357 282.03 357 314.16 Total Points 700 555.53 547.5 488.16 8

ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 4919 Van Buren Street Anchorage, Alaska 99517-3137 EVALUATION SUMMARY BEST AND FINAL OFFER SCORING Opened: 12:00 p.m. Anchorage Time, March 9, 2012 Proposal: IT Data Center Move to Kennedy Elementary School Design/Build VENDORS 2. Consolidated Enterprises Inc 2. Dowland Construction Inc 3. Iyabak Construction LLC 633 E 81 st Ave 4134 Ingra St Ste 201B 4600 Debarr Rd Ste 200 Anchorage, AK 99518 Anchorage, AK 99503 Anchorage, AK 99508 Evaluation Criteria TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 1 2 3 Firm s Experience 70 57 38 34 Project Approach 91 74.1 44.2 52 Experience as Design/Builder for IT Projects 70 54 33 30 Project Team 49 39.2 30.1 25.2 Scheduling, Staging, Moving, and Programming of All Data Center Equipment 35 28 24 24 Quality Control 28 21.2 21.2 8.8 Fee 357 307 357 324.9 Total Points 700 580.5 547.5 498.9 9