Geotechnical Section Foundation Investigation for Structure Design No. FI2169-Pole Barn Building Job No. R35G Route 67, Butler County

Similar documents
LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

G-126 (Continued) MTA Westside Subway Extension Los Angeles, California. Figure: A-2.22c

A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

Area No. 8 Test Pit No. 191

SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011

Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION BRIDGE STRUCTURE REPORT

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

Chittagong Hill Tract Development Facilities (CHTDF) United Nations Development Programme

A. Modified Unified Classification System for Field Classification of Soil

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers

E4055. Quiz. Soil Classification. Name: SOIL CLASSIFICATION QUESTIONS

JOHNSON STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

FACTUAL GROUND INVESTIGATION

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

King Saud University College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department DEFORMATION OF PARTIALLY SATURATED SAND. Sultan Musaed Al-Ghamdi

PROCUREMENT SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Site Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

INSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!

Report. Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Easy Access Upgrade Marrickville Railway Station Station Street, Marrickville, NSW

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Method Statement FOR. Soil Investigation

23 Royal Avenue London. Geotechnical Assessment Report. Report No. LW September 2014

Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette

Report on Engineering Geological Investigation: Test pit logs in KwaMhlanga for RDP houses development.

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS FOR STRUCTURES

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. Adelaide Street Pollution Control Plant Outlet Structure Replacement London, Ontario

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

Testing Procedures. Note: Please refer to Table 2 for a list of completed borings.

Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update

Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

Step 2 Soil Mechanics Introduction The Soil Profile

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

How To Design A Foundation

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S HOUSTON, TEXAS

NTS 103F 9W SKEENA M.D. QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS, B.C FOR ASSESSMENT WORK REQUIREMENTS ON THE EIGHTY-TWO GROUF BY K.G. SANDERS, P. ENG.

An Examination of Changes within the Active Zone Moisture Content and Soil Swell Potential of Expansive Clay Soils at a Site in Denton County, Texas

SOIL COMPACTION BASICS

SECTION EARTH MOVING

Fundamentals of CONE PENETROMETER TEST (CPT) SOUNDINGS. J. David Rogers, Ph.D., P.E., R.G.

FREDERICK SHERRELL LTD

Pavements should be well drained both during and upon completion of construction. Water should not be allowed to pond on or near pavement surfaces.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 6. LABORATORY ANALYSIS 6.1 INDEX PARAMETERS PHYSICAL PARAMETERS CHEMICAL PARAMETERS

Standard Test Procedures Manual

1.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK EXECUTION OF FIELD WORK LABORATORY TESTS FINDINGS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 9

GUIDELINES FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Materials Engineering Report No M (Supersedes Report No.

Effects of Inadequate Geotechnical Investigation on Civil Engineering Projects

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

NOTES on the CONE PENETROMETER TEST

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

The Effects of Trees On Buildings And Their Characteristics - Part 2

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

Geotechnical Investigation Report London Street Generating Station Peterborough, Ontario. February 2012

Specific Task Training Program Course S-33 Soils Field Testing and Inspection: Course Reference Manual

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

Soils, Foundations & Moisture Control

NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR STANDARD PENETRATION TESTING FOR LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS. Jeffrey A Farrar M.S.

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Standard penetration test (SPT)

IN SITU GEOTECHNICAL TESTING USING LIGHTWEIGHT PLATFORMS. Peter Zimmerman, MSCE David Brown, P.G. Geoprobe Systems Salina, Kansas.

APPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION

Evaluation of Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone Penetration Index A Case Study

Washington ,

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION and FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test

Evaluation of biological remains from excavations at Bishop Wilton, North Yorkshire (site code: KINCM )

Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM Construction - Materials Central Laboratory TO: CC/ATT: FROM: Paul Huskey-se/gs Joe Crader-se/ma Sr. Geotechnical Specialist DATE: April 22, 214 SUBJECT: Materials Geotechnical Section Foundation Investigation for Structure Design No. FI2169-Pole Barn Building Job No. R3G Route 67, County General A field investigation was conducted for a proposed Pole Barn Building at Poplar Bluff Maintenance Shed, County, MO. The proposed building location was staked and surveyed by district personnel. Attached are logs of borings for the above noted structure. The layout of the boreholes for the proposed Pole Barn Building is shown in Figure 1. Based on the exploratory borings taken at the four corners of the proposed Pole Barn Building, the top stratum mainly consists of lean clay to a depth of about 2. feet, which is underlain by fat clay scattered gravel and sand to depths ranging from 13.8 feet to the maximum depth explored 16. feet. Recommendations Shallow foundation should bear at least 1. feet below finish grade for frost protection. Shallow foundations that bear at least 1. feet below finish grade can be designed using an allowable bearing of 2. ksf. If unsuitable foundation soil (soft soil) is encountered during excavation, it should be excavated to stiff or better soil/ rock or a maximum of 4 feet, whichever is less, and replaced with engineered fill soil/ or granular material as recommended by the resident engineer. cs j:\sublec\easaw\se\fi2169 pole barn ltr.doc Attachments Our mission is to provide a world-class transportation experience that delights our customers and promotes a prosperous Missouri.

POPLAR BLUFF POLE BARN SOUTHEAST DISTRICT R3G-FI2169 23. NW!. MID!.!.!.!. SW NE SE 67 Outer Road 437 Outer Road 67 USW TO US67N BU SCALE 1:12 j:\sg\workfiles\projectfiles\fi2169\layout BU 67 FIGURE-1

Job No.: R3G-FI2169 Station: SE : 1.3 Easting: 8328.6 Northing: 387.8 Date of Work: 4/16/14-4/16/14 to Water: 7 Hole Open: 7 BORING NO. O-14-28 Time Change: hours -.2' ASPHALT.2-.6' Brown, LEAN CLAY, very stiff, moist.6-2.1' GRAVEL, fine grained 1 (N ) 2.1-4.8' Light reddish brown, FAT CLAY, stiff, moist 4-3-8 (13) PP = 2. tsf MC = 27.7% sat = 122 pcf (1) 4.8-8.' Light reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered gravel, stiff to hard, moist to wet 4-2- (4) PP = 1.7 tsf LETTER BOREHOLE - R3G-S219.GPJ - 4/22/14 1:13 - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ 1 8.-16.' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered fine sand, hard to very stiff, wet Bottom of borehole at 16. feet. -1-9 (22) 4-6-9 (17) -13-17 (3) N = (Em/)Nm N - Corrected N value for standard % SPT efficiency; Em - Measured hammer efficiency in percent; Nm - Observed N-value 9-12-9 (24) PP = 3. tsf Coordinate Zone: Missouri East Coordinate Proj. Factor: 1.

Job No.: R3G-FI2169 Station: NE : 9.6 Easting: 8327.21 Northing: 31637.26 Date of Work: 4/16/14-4/16/14 to Water: Hole Open: Time Change: BORING NO. O-14-29 -.1' ASPHALT.1-2.' Brown, LEAN CLAY with gravel, stiff, moist (N ) 2.-.1' Light reddish brown, FAT CLAY, very stiff, moist 4-6-9 (17) PP = 3. tsf.1-12.' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered gravel, hard to very stiff, moist 7 9-9-1 (22) LETTER BOREHOLE - R3G-S219.GPJ - 4/22/14 1:13 - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ 1 12.-13.8' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY with fine sand, hard, moist 13.8-16.4' Sandstone, light brown, highly weathered, with chert limestone Bottom of borehole at 16.4 feet. 28 8--2 (4) -1-13 (26) 7-12-22 (39) 9-8-44/.4' N = (Em/)Nm N - Corrected N value for standard % SPT efficiency; Em - Measured hammer efficiency in percent; Nm - Observed N-value PP = 4. tsf PP = 3.2 tsf PP = 4. tsf Coordinate Zone: Missouri East Coordinate Proj. Factor: 1.

Job No.: R3G-FI2169 Station: Middle : 9.7 Easting: 83123.276 Northing: 317.94 Date of Work: 4/16/14-4/16/14 to Water: Hole Open: Time Change: BORING NO. O-14-3 -.3' ASPHALT.3-1.2' Brown, SANDY GRAVEL, moist (N ) 1.2-3.9' Brown, LEAN CLAY scattered gravel, very stiff, moist 3 13-32-44/.4' PP = 3.2 tsf 3.9-4.6' BOULDERS 4.6-6.9' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered gravel, hard, moist 8-11-2 (41) 6.9-1.4' Reddish brown, SILTY FAT CLAY scattered gravel & sand, hard, moist LETTER BOREHOLE - R3G-S219.GPJ - 4/22/14 1:13 - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ 1 1.4-' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY with fine sand, very stiff, moist -16.' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY with gravel, hard, moist Bottom of borehole at 16. feet. 47 13-- (3) 13-11-13 (28) 12-13-16 (33) -21-16 (43) N = (Em/)Nm N - Corrected N value for standard % SPT efficiency; Em - Measured hammer efficiency in percent; Nm - Observed N-value PP = 4. tsf PP = 4. tsf PP = 3.7 tsf Coordinate Zone: Missouri East Coordinate Proj. Factor: 1.

Job No.: R3G-FI2169 Station: NW : 9.3 Easting: 83.32 Northing: 31636.72 Date of Work: 4/17/14-4/17/14 to Water: Hole Open: Time Change: BORING NO. O-14-31 -.3' GRAVEL.3-2.2' Brown, LEAN CLAY trace gravel, very stiff, moist (N ) 2.2-3.9' Brown, LEAN CLAY scattered gravel, very stiff, moist 18-44/.3' PP = 2. tsf 3.9-6.3' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered gravel & sand, hard, moist 11-13-19 (37) 6.3-1' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY with fine sand, trace gravel, very stiff to stiff, moist LETTER BOREHOLE - R3G-S219.GPJ - 4/22/14 1:13 - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ 1 1-16.' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered fine sand, trace gravel, hard, moist Bottom of borehole at 16. feet. -11-11 (2) 7-1-12 (2) 1-9-11 (23) 7-2-11 (36) N = (Em/)Nm N - Corrected N value for standard % SPT efficiency; Em - Measured hammer efficiency in percent; Nm - Observed N-value PP = 3. tsf PP = 4. tsf PP = 1. tsf PP = 3. tsf Coordinate Zone: Missouri East Coordinate Proj. Factor: 1. MC =.6% sat = 136 pcf (1)

Job No.: R3G-FI2169 Station: SW : 9. Easting: 8362.6 Northing: 38.68 Date of Work: 4/17/14-4/17/14 to Water: Hole Open: Time Change: BORING NO. O-14-32 -.2' GRAVEL.2-2.1' Brown, LEAN CLAY scattered gravel, very stiff, moist (N ) 2.1-12' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY trace gravel & sand, very stiff to stiff, moist 47 6-11- (3) -7-8 (17) PP = 3. tsf LETTER BOREHOLE - R3G-S219.GPJ - 4/22/14 1:13 - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ 1 12-16.' Reddish brown, FAT CLAY scattered gravel & sand, very stiff, moist Bottom of borehole at 16. feet. 47 4-7-14 (24) -6-9 (17) 4-8- () 6-13-22 (4) N = (Em/)Nm N - Corrected N value for standard % SPT efficiency; Em - Measured hammer efficiency in percent; Nm - Observed N-value PP = 1.2 tsf PP = 1. tsf PP = 2.2 tsf PP = 3. tsf Coordinate Zone: Missouri East Coordinate Proj. Factor: 1. MC = 21.4% sat = 129 pcf (1)

CLIENT MoDOT Southeast District PROJECT NUMBER 1617 Mo. Blvd. Jefferson City, Mo. 619 R3G-FI2169 LITHOLOGIC SYMBOLS (Unified Soil Classification System) ASPHALT: Asphalt PROJECT NAME Poplar Bluff Pole Barn PROJECT LOCATION SAMPLER SYMBOLS Split-Spoon Sampler KEY TO SYMBOLS BLDRCBBL: Boulders and cobbles CH: USCS High Plasticity Clay CHS: USCS High Plasticity Sandy Clay CL: USCS Low Plasticity Clay CLG: USCS Low Plasticity Gravelly Clay GP: USCS Poorly-graded Gravel GP-GM: USCS Poorly-graded Gravel with Silt WELL CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS SANDSTONE: Sandstone KEY TO SYMBOLS - MISSOURI DOT.GDT - 4/22/14 1: - J:\SG\GINT\PROJECT FILES\R3G-FI2169.GPJ LL PI W DD NP -2 PP - LIQUID LIMIT (%) - PLASTIC INDEX (%) - MOISTURE CONTENT (%) - DRY DENSITY (PCF) - NON PLASTIC - PERCENT PASSING NO. 2 SIEVE - POCKET PENETROMETER (TSF) ABBREVIATIONS TV PID UC ppm - TORVANE - PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR - UNCONFINED COMPRESSION - PARTS PER MILLION Water Level at Time of Drilling Water Level at End of Drilling Water Level after Drilling