Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

Similar documents
vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

VERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

Formwork for Concrete

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Roof Decks 172 B, BA, BV Deck N, NA Deck. Form Decks FD,.6 FDV Deck 1.0 FD, 1.0 FDV Deck 1.5 FD Deck 2.0 FD Deck 3.

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

Reinforced Concrete Design

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

METHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

Wang, L., Gong, C. "Abutments and Retaining Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION GUIDELINE Johnson County, KS

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

K x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

Objectives and Purpose...Page 1 Open Bottom Arch - Flow Model...Page 1 The Pros and Cons of Metal Arch Culverts...Page 2 Positive Features of Arch

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1

Wisconsin Building Products Evaluation

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. The design of any foundation consists of following two parts.

LEGACY REPORT. (800) (562) A Subsidiary of the International Code Council. *Corrected March 2014

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Table of Contents. July

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

November 20, Heather Sustersic Dear Professor Sustersic,

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE DESIGN ASSISTANT TOOL FOR BEGINNERS. Kang-Kyu Choi

General Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout

DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX AND PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURES SUMMARY

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

IMPROVING THE STRUT AND TIE METHOD BY INCLUDING THE CONCRETE SOFTENING EFFECT

DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

Concrete Design Manual

Design for Nonstructural Components

Chapter 3 FOUNDATIONS AND FOUNDATION WALLS

Lecture 4. Case Study of 16 th C Church in Old Goa

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

THE DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN METHODS FOR REINFORCED AND UNREINFORCED MASONRY BASEMENT WALLS J.J. ROBERTS

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

Guidelines for the Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

1. ASTM C Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units 2. ASTM C 1372 Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

Structural Foundation System

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

EARTH PRESSURE AND HYDRAULIC PRESSURE

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

Two-Way Post-Tensioned Design

Technical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples: - Posts. Examples: - Railroad track

Embedded Retaining Wall Design Engineering or Paradox?

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

1.054/1.541 Mechanics and Design of Concrete Structures (3-0-9) Outline 1 Introduction / Design Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Structures

Transcription:

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations Organization: F.E.C. Project Name: Ex2 Basement Wall Design by: LAA Job #: 8437 Wall Type: Guest House Basement Date: 7/5/2016 Codes used: 2012 + 2015 IBC, ACI 318-14, ACI 530-11 NOTES: 1. Refer to Table 19.2.1.1, ACI 318-14, for compressive strength requirements. 2. Refer to Table 19.3.1.1, ACI 318-14, for exposure categories and classes. 3. Refer to Table 19.3.2.1, ACI 318-14, for mixture requirements. 1

Input Parameters General Data Number of stem sections 2 Top Restrained Yes Concrete Unit Weight 150 pcf Bar Strength (Fy) 60.00 ksi Parapet Height 0.83 ft Wind Pressure 18.00 psf Groundwater (from top of stem) 9.25 ft Full Ht. Distr. Loading 0.000 kips/ft From Un. Vert. Surch. 0.000 kips/ft Backfill Soils Coulomb Method Soil Friction Angle 25.0 degrees Soil-Wall Friction Angle 16.8 degrees Backfill Slope Angle 0.0 degrees Backwall Inclination Ang. 90.0 degrees Soil Cohesion 150.00 psf Soil/Rock Unit Weight 110.0 pcf Allow Bear. Capacity 2600 psf Uniform Vert. Surcharge 0.0 psf Wall Height (Stem+Foot.) 9.25 ft Uniform Seismic Uniform Seismic 20.000 psf/ft Overconsol. Ratio (OCR) 1.50 Passive Soils Soil Friction Angle 25.0 degrees Soil-Wall Friction Angle -12.5 degrees Passive Slope Angle 0.0 degrees Ftng/Keyway Inclin. Ang. 90.0 degrees Soil Cohesion 150.00 psf Soil/Rock Unit Weight 110.00 pcf Ignore Passive Ht. 1.00 ft Passive F.S. 1.25 F.S. on Sliding Fri. Coeff. 1.33 Global Stability of a Vertical Cut Stem Section Design - Top Stem Type Concrete Concrete Strength (f'c) 2.50 ksi Wall Height 4.00 ft Stem Width 10.00 in Axial Live Load 600 lb/ft Axial Dead Load 1500 lb/ft Reinforcement - Vertical Vert. Bar Size Toe Side #5 Vert. Spacing Toe Side 16.0 in 4.50 in Reinforcement - Horizontal Horiz. Bar Size Toe Side #4 Horiz. Spacing Toe Side 9.0 in Stem Section Design - Bottom Stem Type Concrete Concrete Strength (f'c) 2.50 ksi Wall Height 4.00 ft Stem Width 10.00 in Reinforcement - Vertical Vert. Bar Size Toe Side #5 Vert. Spacing Toe Side 16.0 in 3.00 in Reinforcement - Horizontal Horiz. Bar Size Toe Side #4 Horiz. Spacing Toe Side 9.0 in Footing Dimensions Heel Width Stem Width Bottom Toe Width Footing Thickness Tot. Footing Width Footing Soil Cover Concrete Strength (f'c) Sliding Restraint at the Toe Foundation Setback 2.75 ft 0.83 ft 3.00 ft 1.25 ft 6.58 ft 0.00 ft 2.50 ksi No Base Shear Keyway Apply pressure on both sides (IBC 1807.2.1) No Distance from Toe 4.00 ft Keyway Embedment 1.50 ft Keyway Width 1.00 ft Keyway Vert. Bar #4 Vert. Bar Spacing 16.0 in 3.00 in Heel Reinforcement Bar Size #4 Bar Spacing 8.0 in 2.00 in Toe Reinforcement Bar Size #4 Bar Spacing 8.0 in 3.00 in Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement S & T Bar Size #4 Nr of Bars Bottom 4 Nr of Bars Top 4 Nr of Bars Key 2 2

Footing Settlement Poisson's ratio 0.35 Elastic Soil Modulus 900000 psf Vert. Subgrade Modulus 110 ton/ft^3 3

Analysis and Design Results Earth Pressures At Rest Earth Pressure Coeff. 0.685 Passive Resistance Coeff. 3.552 Earth Press. - Horiz. Comp. 2687.14 lb Earth Press. - Vert. Comp. 0.00 lb Uniform Surcharge Comp. 0.00 lb Passive Resist. Comp. 778.69 lb Opposing Keyway Press. (1807.2.1) 0.00 lb Equiv. At Rest Fluid Pressure 75.4 psf/ft Equiv. Fluid Resistance Passive 312.6 psf/ft Seismic Pressure Component 438.67 lb Sliding Friction Coefficient 0.35 Retaining Wall Stability Overturning F.S. Results Not applicable. The wall has a top restraint force of 385 lb/ft (service level). Sliding F.S. Results Sliding Force 3125.81 lb Resisting Force 3813.79 lb F.S. against Sliding 1.22 Footing Pressures Resultant Loc. from Toe Toe Bearing Pressure Heel Bearing Pressure 2.54 ft Resultant in middle third 2051 psf 129 psf Foundation Setback Setback Does Not Apply when Passive Slope Angle >= 0 Surcharge Loads Strip Load Does Not Apply Line Load Does Not Apply Point Load Does Not Apply Total Lateral Thrust Total Resultant from Stem Top 0.00 lb/ft 0.00 ft Footing Settlement Average Bearing Pressure 1072 psf Distortion Settlement 0.18 in Consolidation Settlement 0.35 in Total Settlement 0.53 in Settlement OK Stronger soil over weaker layer or vice-versa are not considered Stem Sections - Top Flexure 1503 lb-ft 5141 lb-ft Reinforcement - Vertical Rho Min. Vertical 0.0018 Rho Max. Vertical 0.0129 Actual Rho Vertical 0.0019 Vert. Toe Side Steel Bar Used #5 @ 16.0 Area of Steel - Vertical Reinforcement - Horizontal Rho Min. Horizontal 0.0018 Rho Max. Horizontal 0.0129 Actual Rho Horizontal 0.0022 Horiz. Toe Side Steel Bar Used #4 @ 9.0 Area of Steel - Horizontal Shear Shear Demand (Vu) Shear Capacity (PhiVc) Stem Sections - Bottom Flexure 0.23 in^2 0.27 in^2 578 lb 4669 lb 3480 lb-ft 6711 lb-ft Reinforcement - Vertical Rho Min. Vertical 0.0018 Rho Max. Vertical 0.0129 Actual Rho Vertical 0.0019 Vert. Toe Side Steel Bar Used #5 @ 16.0 Area of Steel - Vertical Reinforcement - Horizontal Rho Min. Horizontal 0.0018 Rho Max. Horizontal 0.0129 Actual Rho Horizontal 0.0022 Horiz. Toe Side Steel Bar Used #4 @ 9.0 Area of Steel - Horizontal Shear Shear Demand (Vu) Shear Capacity (PhiVc) Heel Design Flexure 0.23 in^2 0.27 in^2 2690 lb 6019 lb 2581 lb-ft 16831 lb-ft Rho Min. Heel 0.0018 Rho Max. Heel 0.0129 Actual Rho Used 0.0020 Heel Steel Used #4 @ 8.0 Heel Area of Steel Shear Shear Demand (Vu) Shear Capacity (PhiVn) 0.30 in^2 3563 lb 11475 lb 4

Toe Design Flexure 5675 lb-ft 15481 lb-ft Rho Min. Toe 0.0018 Rho Max. Toe 0.0129 Actual Rho Used 0.0021 Toe Steel Used #4 @ 8.0 Toe Area of Steel Shear Shear Demand (Vu) Shear Capacity (PhiVn) 0.30 in^2 3485 lb 10575 lb Base Shear Keyway 1246 lb-ft 5787 lb-ft Vertical reinforcement #4 @ 16.0 Clear Cover 3.0 in Stem - Top of Footing Shear Key Bearing Stress (10% f'c) Pure Shear Stress Required Key Width Required Key Depth Shrinkage and Temperature Bar Spacing Bottom Bar Spacing Top Bar Spacing Key Global Stability Req. Cohesion for Toe Circle Req. Cohesion for Base Circle 250 psi 85 psi 2.6 in 0.9 in Max. spacing is 18.0 in 13.8 in 15.2 in 16.5 in Only valid for Cohesive Soils, not a comprehensive Slope Stability Analysis 240.5 psf 175.8 psf Bar Development Heel into toe Toe into heel Bottom stem into footing Top stem into bottom stem 18.7 in 14.4 in 10.5 in 18.0 in Stem Wall Deflection The wall is restrained at the top against translation only and not rotation 5

Table of Test Results - Stem Forces Node # Stem Ht, Soil Press, Vu, phivn, Mu, phimn, Slope/Rot, Deflection, inch psf lb lb lb-ft lb-ft deg in 1 0.0 0.0 578.1-4668.8 0.0-5141.2-0.010 0.000 2 1.9 0.0 573.5-4668.8 92.1-5141.2-0.010 0.000 3 3.8 0.0 568.9-4668.8 183.5-5141.2-0.009-0.001 4 5.8 0.0 564.3-4668.8 274.2-5141.2-0.009-0.001 5 7.7 0.0 559.7-4668.8 364.1-5141.2-0.009-0.001 6 9.6 0.0 555.1-4668.8 453.3-5141.2-0.009-0.002 7 11.5-35.7 550.6-4668.8 541.7-5141.2-0.009-0.002 8 13.4-55.0 543.3-4668.8 629.3-5141.2-0.009-0.002 9 15.4-74.3 533.0-4668.8 715.4-5141.2-0.008-0.002 10 17.3-93.6 519.6-4668.8 799.7-5141.2-0.008-0.003 11 19.2-112.9 503.0-4668.8 881.5-5141.2-0.007-0.003 12 21.1-132.2 483.4-4668.8 960.5-5141.2-0.007-0.003 13 23.0-151.5 460.7-4668.8 1036.1-5141.2-0.007-0.003 14 25.0-170.8 435.0-4668.8 1107.8-5141.2-0.006-0.004 15 26.9-190.1 406.1-4668.8 1175.1-5141.2-0.006-0.004 16 28.8-209.4 374.1-4668.8 1237.5-5141.2-0.005-0.004 17 30.7-228.7 339.1-4668.8 1294.6-5141.2-0.004-0.004 18 32.6-248.0 301.0-4668.8 1345.9-5141.2-0.004-0.004 19 34.6-267.3 259.8-4668.8 1390.8-5141.2-0.003-0.004 20 36.5-286.6 215.4-4668.8 1428.8-5141.2-0.002-0.005 21 38.4-305.9 168.1-4668.8 1459.6-5141.2-0.002-0.005 22 40.3-325.2 117.6-4668.8 1482.5-5141.2-0.001-0.005 23 42.2-344.4 64.0-4668.8 1497.0-5141.2 0.000-0.005 24 44.2-363.7 7.4-4668.8 1502.8-5141.2 0.000-0.005 25 46.1-383.0-52.4-4668.8 1499.2-5141.2 0.001-0.005 26 48.0-402.3-115.2-4668.8 1485.8-5141.2 0.002-0.005 27 49.9-421.6-181.1-6018.8 1462.2-6710.6 0.002-0.005 28 51.8-440.9-250.1-6018.8 1427.7-6710.6 0.003-0.004 29 53.8-460.2-322.2-6018.8 1382.0-6710.6 0.004-0.004 30 55.7-479.5-397.4-6018.8 1324.4-6710.6 0.004-0.004 31 57.6-498.8-475.7-6018.8 1254.6-6710.6 0.005-0.004 32 59.5-518.1-557.1-6018.8 1172.0-6710.6 0.005-0.004 33 61.4-537.4-641.5-6018.8 1076.2-6710.6 0.006-0.004 34 63.4-556.7-729.0-6018.8 966.6-6710.6 0.006-0.003 35 65.3-576.0-819.7-6018.8 842.7-6710.6 0.007-0.003 36 67.2-595.3-913.4-6018.8 704.1-6710.6 0.007-0.003 37 69.1-614.6-1010.2-6018.8 550.3-6710.6 0.007-0.003 38 71.0-633.9-1110.0-6018.8 380.7-6710.6 0.008-0.003 39 73.0-653.2-1213.0-6018.8 194.9-6710.6 0.008-0.002 40 74.9-672.5-1319.1-6018.8-7.6-6710.6 0.008-0.002 41 76.8-691.8-1428.2-6018.8-227.3-6710.6 0.008-0.002 42 78.7-711.1-1540.5-6018.8-464.8-6710.6 0.008-0.001 43 80.6-730.4-1655.8-6018.8-720.5-6710.6 0.007-0.001 44 82.6-749.7-1774.2-6018.8-994.8-6710.6 0.007-0.001 45 84.5-769.0-1895.7-6018.8-1288.4-6710.6 0.006-0.001 46 86.4-788.3-2020.3-6018.8-1601.6-6710.6 0.006-0.001 47 88.3-807.6-2147.9-6018.8-1935.0-6710.6 0.005 0.000 48 90.2-826.9-2278.7-6018.8-2289.1-6710.6 0.004 0.000 49 92.2-846.2-2412.5-6018.8-2664.4-6710.6 0.003 0.000 50 94.1-865.5-2549.5-6018.8-3061.3-6710.6 0.002 0.000 51 96.0-884.8-2689.5-6018.8-3480.4-6710.6 0.000 0.000 6

Stem Forces 7

P-M Diagrams References: 1. ACI 318-14: Building Code and Commentary 2. 2012 + 2015 IBC: International Building Code 3. Reinforced Concrete Fundamentals, 5th ed. Ferguson, Breen, & Jirsa, 1988, Wiley 4. Soil Mechanics : Principles and Applications Perloff and Baron, 1976, Ronald Press 5. The Design and Construction of Engineering Foundations, 2nd ed, F.D.C. Henry, 1986, Chapman and Hall 6. Geotechnical Engineering: Foundation Design John Cernica, 1995, Wiley 7. Foundation Analysis & Design, 1988, 4th Ed. J.E. Bowles, McGraw-Hill 8. Retaining Walls, EM 1110-2-2502, Corps. of Engineers, 1961 9. Active and Passive Earth Pressure Coeficient Tables, A.R. Jumikis, 1962, Rutgers State University 10. Engineering Design in Geotechnics, 2nd ed, F. Azizi, 2013 11. "BEAMANAL" Spreadsheet v2.5, Alex Tomanovich, P.E. 12. Modern Formulas for Statics and Dynamics: A Stress and Strain Approach, Pilkey & Chuang, 1978 13. Geotechnical Engineering & Soil Testing, Al-Khafaji & Andersland, 1992, Saunders 14. The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook, SP-17(14), Vol. 2, ACI 15. SoilStructure Software : Retaining Wall v3.0.1 8