Lectures 7-8. x y z p x p y p z L =

Similar documents
PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model. Introduction/Aims

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

by the matrix A results in a vector which is a reflection of the given

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory

1 Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig

Linear Programming Notes V Problem Transformations

Classical Angular Momentum. The Physics of Rotational Motion.

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

A Primer on Index Notation

Quantum Mechanics: Postulates

The three-dimensional rotations are defined as the linear transformations of the vector x = (x 1, x 2, x 3 ) x i = R ij x j, (2.1) x 2 = x 2. (2.

Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N)

1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state

State of Stress at Point

LS.6 Solution Matrices

7. Show that the expectation value function that appears in Lecture 1, namely

Elasticity Theory Basics

Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system.

Theory of electrons and positrons

General Framework for an Iterative Solution of Ax b. Jacobi s Method

x = + x 2 + x

2. Spin Chemistry and the Vector Model

Chapter 6. Orthogonality

Teoretisk Fysik KTH. Advanced QM (SI2380), test questions 1

Vector or Pseudovector?

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

Fourth-Order Compact Schemes of a Heat Conduction Problem with Neumann Boundary Conditions

Precession of spin and Precession of a top

5.61 Physical Chemistry 25 Helium Atom page 1 HELIUM ATOM

PHYS 1624 University Physics I. PHYS 2644 University Physics II

BX in ( u, v) basis in two ways. On the one hand, AN = u+

Section Inner Products and Norms

The Characteristic Polynomial

8 Square matrices continued: Determinants

Time dependence in quantum mechanics Notes on Quantum Mechanics

Applied Linear Algebra I Review page 1

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCES IN PHYSICS (MS PHYS) (LIST OF COURSES BY SEMESTER, THESIS OPTION)

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

Bits Superposition Quantum Parallelism

Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem

Grade Level Year Total Points Core Points % At Standard %

Vector and Matrix Norms

Linear Algebra and TI 89

Mathematical finance and linear programming (optimization)

1 of 79 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering EOSC 433

October 3rd, Linear Algebra & Properties of the Covariance Matrix

The Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited

5.04 Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II

Math Lecture 33 : Positive Definite Matrices

Click on the links below to jump directly to the relevant section

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors. Jordan canonical form (continued).

Numerical Methods I Eigenvalue Problems

2 Session Two - Complex Numbers and Vectors

Solving Quadratic Equations by Factoring

8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Problem Set 5

Lecture L26-3D Rigid Body Dynamics: The Inertia Tensor

DATA ANALYSIS II. Matrix Algorithms

[1] Diagonal factorization

PGR Computing Programming Skills

Similar matrices and Jordan form

Lecture 8. Generating a non-uniform probability distribution

3.1 Solving Systems Using Tables and Graphs

Brief Review of Tensors

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

Figure 1.1 Vector A and Vector F

Basic Concepts in Nuclear Physics

GRADnet Video Conference PhD courses in January and February 2015

7 Gaussian Elimination and LU Factorization

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

Chapter 3. Distribution Problems. 3.1 The idea of a distribution The twenty-fold way

From Wave Mechanics to Matrix Mechanics: The Finite Element Method

Partial Fractions. Combining fractions over a common denominator is a familiar operation from algebra:

Lecture 5 Motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field

Generally Covariant Quantum Mechanics

3. Derive the partition function for the ideal monoatomic gas. Use Boltzmann statistics, and a quantum mechanical model for the gas.

Continuity of the Perron Root

13- What is the maximum number of electrons that can occupy the subshell 3d? a) 1 b) 3 c) 5 d) 2

Chapter 18: The Structure of the Atom

Solving simultaneous equations using the inverse matrix

Linear Algebra: Vectors

it can be shown that the above angular momentum operators obey the following set of commutation relations:

Concepts in Theoretical Physics

Mechanics 1: Conservation of Energy and Momentum

Solution to Homework 2

Groups and Representations in Quantum Mechanics

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

Atomic Structure Ron Robertson

Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix multiplication).

2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126.

Notes on Orthogonal and Symmetric Matrices MENU, Winter 2013

Review of the isotope effect in the hydrogen spectrum

Group Theory and Chemistry

Orbital Dynamics in Terms of Spacetime Angular Momentum

Electric Dipole moments as probes of physics beyond the Standard Model

n 2 + 4n + 3. The answer in decimal form (for the Blitz): 0, 75. Solution. (n + 1)(n + 3) = n lim m 2 1

Transcription:

S.K. Saikin October 1, 2009 7 Angular Momentum I Content: Definition of Orbital Angular Momentum. Commutation Rules. Lectures 7-8 Matrix Representation of Angular Momentum. 7.1 Definition Let us use the same definition as in classical mechanics L = r p, (1) where r and p are the position and the momentum operators respectively. The vector product (1) can be written as ê x ê y ê z L = x y z p x p y p z. (2) In the spatial basis we need to replace the momentum operator as p = i. The Cartesian components of the orbital angular momentum are ( ) L x = i y z z, y ( ) L y = i z x x, (3) z ( ) L z = i x y y. x Exercise: How it can be written in the momentum basis? We should introduce one more operator L 2 = L 2 x + L 2 y + L 2 z. (4) The angular momentum defined by Eq. (1) has units of. Sometimes it is easier to operate with a unitless angular momentum assuming = 1. This is only a mathematical trick. A physical quantity should have units. 1

7.2 Commutation Rules Commutators of an orbital angular momentum operator L with a position operator r, a momentum operator p and itself may be written in a compact form [L j, A k ] = i ɛ jkl A l, (5) where j, k, l are for the Cartesian components of the vectors, and the antisymmetric tensor ɛ jkl is defined as 1 j, k, l cyclic ɛ jkl = 1 j, k, l anticyclic 0 otherwise Example 1: [L z, x] = [xp y yp x, x] = xp y x yp x x xxp y + xyp x = x[p y, x] + y[x, p x ] = i y. (6) Example 2: [L z, p y ] = [xp y yp x, p y ] = xp y p y yp x p y p y xp y + p y yp x = [p y, y]p x + [x, p y ]p y = i p x. (7) One more useful commutator: [L 2, L i ] = 0. (8) The vector of the angular momentum operator doesn t commute with itself, but it commutes with its absolute value. We can define a basis ψ, where two of the operators L 2 and L i, i = x, y, z are simultaneously diagonal. Usually, the basis states are chosen to diagonalize L z. In this case L x and L y are non-diagonal. 7.3 Matrix representation of the angular momentum operator 1. Let us introduce operator a mode general operator of angular momentum J. It satisfies all the commutation rules given above, but not Eq. 1. For the sake of simplicity we assume that = 1. 2. We also define the rising J + and the lowering J operators as These operators are non-hermitian J ± = J x ± J y. (9) J = J +. (10) 2

Components of the angular momentum operator in terms of J ± are And the square of angular momentum is J x = 1 2 (J + + J ), (11) J y = i 2 (J + J ). J 2 = J 2 z + 1 2 (J +J + J J + ). (12) 3. Commutation rules and useful relations: [J 2, J ± ] = 0, (13) [J z, J ± ] = ±J ±, (14) Combining Eq. (14) with Eq. (12) we get [J +, J ] = 2J z. (15) J + J = J 2 J 2 z + J z, (16) J J + = J 2 J 2 z J z. (17) Operators J ± are non-diagonal in the chosen basis. However, J ± J are diagonal. 4. Let us define the basis states µ, ν that satisfy to two eigenvalue problems J 2 µ, ν = ν µ, ν, (18) J z µ, ν = µ µ, ν. (19) We will construct the matrices of the operators J 2, J z, and J ± in this basis. Because J ± commutes with J 2 we get J 2 J ± µ, ν = J ± J 2 µ, ν = νj ± µ, ν (20) The state J ± µ, ν is an eigenstate of the operator J 2 with the same eigenvalue. Similarly, using the commutation relations for J z and J ± we get that the state J ± µ, ν is an eigenstate of the operator J z with the eigenvalue µ ± 1 respectively. Thus, we can write that J ± µ, ν = γ µ,ν µ ± 1, ν, (21) 3

where γ µ,ν is a complex coefficient, which may depend on the eigenvalues of J 2 and J z. 5. Let us impose the condition that the norm of the eigenvector is not negative µ, ν µ, ν 0. (22) It has been shown above that if we apply the operator J + to the state µ, ν the resulting state should be proportional to µ + 1, ν. Its norm also should be not negative. This condition can be written as µ, ν J J + µ, ν 0. (23) We can substitute the J J + operator with Eq. 17 and obtain the relation for eigenvalues of J 2 and J z which set up the upper boundary on the value of µ ν µ(µ 1) 0, (24) µ max 1 1 2 + + ν. (25) 4 Let assume that µ max = j, then ν = j(j + 1). Actually, from the the norm inequality we can get only a weaker condition ν j(j + 1). To get the equality we need to use the definition of J 2, see Eq. (4) and matrices of all the components of J. Another way to get ν is using the relation µ max, ν J J + µ max, ν = 0. (26) This is true because J + µ max, ν = 0. Then, we can substitute J J + with Eq. (17) and get ν = j(j + 1). Applying J + to the state with a maximal value of µ we should get 0. But we can apply J. If we apply it k-times the final state will be proportional to j k, ν. This state also should satisfy the condition of Eq. 22. In the way similar to the discussed above we can get that k max = 2j, (27) where k max is a maximal number of J operators that we can apply to the state j k, ν. Excercise: Derive the lower boundary for µ. In Eq. (27) k m ax is an integer number. Therefore, j can be and for each j the value of m can be j = 0, 1 2, 1, 3,... (28) 2 m = j, j + 1,..., j 1, j (29) 4

Now, for each j we can construct matrices of J 2 and J z. and For example for j = 3/2 m, j J z m, j = mδ jj δ mm (30) m, j J 2 m, j = j(j + 1)δ jj δ mm (31) J z = 3/2 0 0 0 0 1/2 0 0 0 0 1/2 0 0 0 0 3/2 (32) and J 2 = 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 (33) For the orbital angular momentum operator the the values of m can be integer only. This can be shown using a spatial representation of L. Half-integer values may appear when we study spin. For the operators J ± we know that or J + m, j = λ m,j m + 1, j (34) m + 1, j J + m, j = λ m,j (35) In a most general case the coefficient λ m,j can be a complex number. If we take a Hermitian conjugate of the last equation we get Now, we can calculate matrix elements in the following way or J m + 1, j = λ m,j m, j (36) J J + m, j = λ m,j 2 m, j = (J 2 J 2 z J z ) m, j, (37) λ m,j = j(j + 1) m(m + 1) = (j m)(j + m + 1) (38) 5

The matrix elements of the operators J ± are defined by the following relations and For example, for j = 3/2 m, j J + m, j = (j m)(j + m + 1)δ j jδ m m+1 (39) m, j J m, j = (j m + 1)(j + m)δ j jδ m m 1. (40) J + = J = 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0. (41) At this point we can come back and prove that the eigenvalue of the operator J 2 is j(j + 1). We just need to write it in terms of the components of the angular momentum. Exercise 1: Show that ν = j(j + 1) (j = 3/2) using the matrix form for J +, J, J z, and J 2. Exercise 2: Write matrices J x,y,z,, J ±, J 2 for j = 2. 7.4 Spin Now, it is easy to introduce a spin S as an intrinsic angular momentum of a particle. It possesses all the properties of J. Its basis states may be written as m s, s. Because the spin of a particle does not depend on its orbital motion for a given type of particles s = const. For electrons, protons and neutrons s = 1/2. References [1] W. H. Louisell, Quantum statistical properties of radiation. (Wiley, New York, 1990), Part II, Chapters 2.6. [2] J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1994), Chapters 3.5-3.6. 6