Factor Analysis. Goals and uses of FA

Similar documents
Overview of Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis. Advanced Financial Accounting II Åbo Akademi School of Business

A Brief Introduction to SPSS Factor Analysis

4. There are no dependent variables specified... Instead, the model is: VAR 1. Or, in terms of basic measurement theory, we could model it as:

Common factor analysis

2. Linearity (in relationships among the variables--factors are linear constructions of the set of variables) F 2 X 4 U 4

T-test & factor analysis

FACTOR ANALYSIS NASC

To do a factor analysis, we need to select an extraction method and a rotation method. Hit the Extraction button to specify your extraction method.

Factor Analysis. Principal components factor analysis. Use of extracted factors in multivariate dependency models

Factor Analysis Example: SAS program (in blue) and output (in black) interleaved with comments (in red)

Factor Analysis and Structural equation modelling

Chapter 7 Factor Analysis SPSS

Psychology 7291, Multivariate Analysis, Spring SAS PROC FACTOR: Suggestions on Use

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis: rotation. Psychology 588: Covariance structure and factor models

Factor Analysis Using SPSS

Statistics in Psychosocial Research Lecture 8 Factor Analysis I. Lecturer: Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis. Chapter 420. Introduction

A Brief Introduction to Factor Analysis

Rachel J. Goldberg, Guideline Research/Atlanta, Inc., Duluth, GA

5.2 Customers Types for Grocery Shopping Scenario

Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components. Pekka Malo & Anton Frantsev 30E00500 Quantitative Empirical Research Spring 2016

Exploratory Factor Analysis Brian Habing - University of South Carolina - October 15, 2003

FACTOR ANALYSIS. Factor Analysis is similar to PCA in that it is a technique for studying the interrelationships among variables.

Principal Component Analysis

How To Run Factor Analysis

EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN MPLUS, R AND SPSS. sigbert@wiwi.hu-berlin.de

How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis Using SPSS

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS

What is Rotating in Exploratory Factor Analysis?

Multivariate Analysis (Slides 13)

Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis

Introduction to Principal Components and FactorAnalysis

Questionnaire Evaluation with Factor Analysis and Cronbach s Alpha An Example

SPSS ADVANCED ANALYSIS WENDIANN SETHI SPRING 2011

Factor Analysis. Factor Analysis

Using Principal Components Analysis in Program Evaluation: Some Practical Considerations

Factor Analysis. Sample StatFolio: factor analysis.sgp

Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research

Factor Analysis: Statnotes, from North Carolina State University, Public Administration Program. Factor Analysis

Multivariate Analysis

An introduction to. Principal Component Analysis & Factor Analysis. Using SPSS 19 and R (psych package) Robin Beaumont robin@organplayers.co.

APPRAISAL OF FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONING OF PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

Psychology 405: Psychometric Theory Homework on Factor analysis and structural equation modeling

Statistics for Business Decision Making

Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA James Dean Brown (University of Hawai i at Manoa)

lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling

Topic 10: Factor Analysis

Review Jeopardy. Blue vs. Orange. Review Jeopardy

Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Social Sciences Research

Data analysis process

EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN & SOCIAL NORMS ON ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS

Part III. Item-Level Analysis

CHAPTER 4 EXAMPLES: EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

9.2 User s Guide SAS/STAT. The FACTOR Procedure. (Book Excerpt) SAS Documentation

Confirmatory factor analysis in MPlus

Specification of Rasch-based Measures in Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Thomas Salzberger

THE USING FACTOR ANALYSIS METHOD IN PREDICTION OF BUSINESS FAILURE

Validation of the Core Self-Evaluations Scale research instrument in the conditions of Slovak Republic

SPSS and AMOS. Miss Brenda Lee 2:00p.m. 6:00p.m. 24 th July, 2015 The Open University of Hong Kong

I n d i a n a U n i v e r s i t y U n i v e r s i t y I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s

Principal Component Analysis

ISSN: (Online) Volume 2, Issue 3, March 2014 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES IS TO LISREL AS PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS IS TO COMMON FACTOR ANALYSIS. Wynne W. Chin University of Calgary, CANADA

How to do a factor analysis with the psych package

Does organizational culture cheer organizational profitability? A case study on a Bangalore based Software Company

Factors affecting teaching and learning of computer disciplines at. Rajamangala University of Technology

STA 4107/5107. Chapter 3

A Beginner s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis

Social Media Marketing Management 社 會 媒 體 行 銷 管 理 確 認 性 因 素 分 析. (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) 1002SMMM12 TLMXJ1A Tue 12,13,14 (19:20-22:10) D325

Factor Analysis - SPSS

Reliability Analysis

Using R and the psych package to find ω

Research Methodology: Tools

Dimensionality Reduction: Principal Components Analysis

Factor analysis. Angela Montanari

A Solution Manual and Notes for: Exploratory Data Analysis with MATLAB by Wendy L. Martinez and Angel R. Martinez.

Current Topics in Statistics for Applied Researchers Factor Analysis

CHAPTER 8 FACTOR EXTRACTION BY MATRIX FACTORING TECHNIQUES. From Exploratory Factor Analysis Ledyard R Tucker and Robert C.

Introduction to Principal Component Analysis: Stock Market Values

1 Teaching notes on GMM 1.

Factor Analysis - 2 nd TUTORIAL

Mplus Tutorial August 2012

Factor Rotations in Factor Analyses.

Data Analysis in Mixed Research: A Primer

The Effect of Macroeconomic Factors on Indian Stock Market Performance: A Factor Analysis Approach

LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS

This chapter will demonstrate how to perform multiple linear regression with IBM SPSS

Adoption of Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs) by Internal Auditors: Current issues in the UK

Pull and Push Factors of Migration: A Case Study in the Urban Area of Monywa Township, Myanmar

Transcription:

Factor Analysis Marieke E. Timmerman Heymans Institute for Psychology, DPMG m.e.timmerman@rug.nl 1 Goals and uses of FA Type of data: scores of n subject on (large) number (j) variables in j variables no distinction between predictors (independent variables) and criterium (dependent variable(s)) Goal FA: summarize large number of variables into (much) smaller number of factors, without loosing too much information relate observed variables to latent variabe(s) 2 1

Types FA Common FA (CFA) ( Lisrel ) Analysis (CA) Exploratory Exploratory CFA Principal Analysis Confirmatory Confirmatory CFA Multiple Group Method 3 Empirical Example: PANAS (positive and negative affect schedule) In general, to what extent do you feel... interested, distressed, excited, interested) Number of subjects in sample: 12 (very few, so generelizability to population is questionable) 4 2

Analysis Start: scores of n subjects on j variables, n>j Goal: summarize j variables into smaller number (q) of components is new variable constructed from j observed variables All n subjects get a score on each component ( component score ) 5 s : weighted sumvariabele of j variables Example jittery (J), distressed (D), excited (E), interested (I) component: component 1 (C1) C1= 0.23 J + -0.12 D + 0.89 E + 0.95 0.23 is weight for variable J I 6 3

C1= 0.23*J + -0.12*D + 0.89*E + 0.95*I 3.13=0.23*2 + -0.12*1 + 0.89*1 + 0.95*2 7 Correlations between variables and Loading matrix component(s) correlatie correlation C1 jittery -.036 distress -.332 excited.908 interest.860 Interpretation C1: arousal (o.i.d.) 8 4

Quality of summary Variance explained (compare regression) Computed from correlation(comp,variable) 2: correlation with (correlation with c1 c1) 2 jittery 0.036 0.001 Variance explained: (1.675/4)*100%= 41.8 distressed 0.332 0.110 excited 0.908 0.824 interested 0.860 0.740 sum 1.675 9 Types FA Common FA (CFA) ( Lisrel ) Analysis (CA) Exploratory Exploratory CFA Principal Analysis Confirmatory Confirmatory CFA Multiple Group Method 10 5

Principal s (PC) PC s are optimal summarizers of the data weights for variables are such that PC s explain as much variance as possible 1 e PC explains most variance, 2 e PC explains a little less variance,..., last PC explains least amount of variance weight for PC s found using a computer 11 12 6

13 Correlations between variables and component(s) Matrix SPSS terminology. More often: Loading matrix 1 2 jittery -.573.509 distressed -.780.409 upset -.823.462 afraid -.672.548 scared -.590.630 inspired.771.528 excited.529.693 determined.906.295 interested.771.411 enthusiast.816.455 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. a 2 components extracted. 14 7

Interpretation of loadings Matrix (loadings < 0.50 en >0.50 are bold) 1 2 jittery -.573.509 distressed -.780.409 upset -.823.462 afraid -.672.548 scared -.590.630 inspired.771.528 excited.529.693 determined.906.295 interested.771.411 enthusiast.816.455 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. Verkl. var. 53.69% 25.59% a 2 components extracted. 1: contrast between positive and negative items 2: general level Totale variance explained 53.69+25.59=79.27% (Note: summing of variance explained is only allowed with orthogonal 15 (= uncorrelated) components Loadings in a graph 1 component 2 (algemeen nivo) afraid scared upset jittery distressed 0.75 0.5 0.25 0-1 -0.75-0.5-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1-0.25-0.5-0.75 excited inspired interested determined enthusiast -1 component 1 (contrast) 16 8

1 component 2 (algemeen nivo) afraid scared upset jittery distressed 0.75 0.5 0.25 0-1 -0.75-0.5-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1-0.25-0.5-0.75 excited inspired interested determined enthusiast -1 component 1 (contrast) 17 Alternative graph... component 2' (negatief affect) 1 upset afraid scared distressed 0.75 jittery 0.5 0.25 excited 0-1 -0.75-0.5-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1-0.25-0.5-0.75 inspired interested enthusiast determined -1 component 1 (positief affect) 18 9

Rotated Matrix a JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA 1 2-7.13E-02.763 -.291.831 -.285.899 -.117.859-2.08E-04.863.924 -.141.860.145.863 -.403.844 -.227.907 -.225 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations. 19 Rotation Alternative representation of loadings to achieve a better interpretation Total amount of variance explained remains equal... but the variance explained per component changes Infinite number of rotations possible 20 10

Orthogonal (uncorrelated) versus oblique components Orthogonal? scores uncorrelated Oblique? scores correlated Interpretation: anxiety and depression correlated or not? 21 r comp_1,comp_2 =0 22 11

Orthogonal versus oblique rotation Options for rotation in SPSS Orthogonal Varimax Quartimax Equamax Oblique Oblimin Promax 23 Choice of numbers of components Goal: balance between a good description and sparseness Criteria: 1 Eigenvalues>1 (default SPSS): 100% J Scree-test: use number of components before scree in scree plot Content 24 12

Eigenvalue is proportional to % variance explained 6 5 4 3 Scree Plot Scree 2 Eigenvalue 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number 25 26 13

27 28 14

JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA Communalities SPSS output Initial Extraction 1.000.587 1.000.775 1.000.890 1.000.751 1.000.745 1.000.874 1.000.760 1.000.907 1.000.764 1.000.873 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. Variance explained per variabele 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % 5.368 53.681 53.681 5.368 53.681 53.681 4.058 40.579 40.579 2.559 25.592 79.273 2.559 25.592 79.273 3.869 38.694 79.273.750 7.502 86.775.477 4.770 91.546.351 3.514 95.059.268 2.677 97.736.161 1.612 99.348 4.329E-02.433 99.781 1.679E-02.168 99.949 5.098E-03 5.098E-02 100.000 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. 30 15

JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA Matrix a 1 2 -.573.509 -.780.409 -.823.462 -.672.548 -.590.630.771.528.529.693.906.295.771.411.816.455 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. a. 2 components extracted. Rotated Matrix a JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA 1 2-7.13E-02.763 -.291.831 -.285.899 -.117.859-2.08E-04.863.924 -.141.860.145.863 -.403.844 -.227.907 -.225 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations. Transformation Matrix 1 2 1 2.730 -.683.683.730 Extraction Method: Principal Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. 31 Plot in Rotated Space 1.0 upset distressafraid scared jittery.5 excited 0.0 inspired interest enthusia determin 2 -.5-1.0-1.0 -.5 0.0.5 1.0 1 32 16

Use of PCA for confirmatory purposes PCA correct solution: no problem PCA incorrect solution: more components and/or different rotation might yield solution desired 33 Types FA Common FA (CFA) ( Lisrel ) Analysis (CA) Exploratory Exploratory CFA Principal Analysis Confirmatory Confirmatory CFA Multiple Group Method 34 17

CFA versus CA X=C+U with X: observed variable C: common part of variable U: unique part of variables (structural + measurement error) CFA: factor linear combination of C CA: component (factor) linear combination of X 35 Advantage CFA over CA: Distinction between common and unique parts theoretically elegant Model of CFA more realistic Problem CFA (en niet bij CA) Distinction C versus U can be done in many different ways many different model estimates Estimation CFA model: not X=C+U, but Var(X)=Var(C)+Var(U), with Var(C): common variance=communality Var(U): unique variance Different estamation methods for Var(U) (e.g., maximum likelihood, Unweighted least squares) Estimate Factors from (co)variance of common part of variables 36 18

JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA PANAS: Exploratory FA Communalities a Initial.910.952.969.893.973.946.880.985.883.988 Var(X)=Var(C)+Var(U) Extraction Method: Maximum Likelihood. a. One or more communalitiy estimates greater than 1 were encountered during iterations. The resulting solution should be interpreted with caution. Var(C): communality Var(U): unieke variantie en Var(X)=1 (analyse van correlatiematrix) Var(U)<0: highly suspect estimations! 37 observed data (Same as PCA) Common part of data Factor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Initial Eigenvalues Total Variance Explained Total % of VarianceCumulative % Total % of VarianceCumulative % 5.368 53.681 53.681 3.834 38.341 38.341 2.559 25.592 79.273 3.529 35.288 73.629.750 7.502 86.775.477 4.770 91.546.351 3.514 95.059.268 2.677 97.736.161 1.612 99.348 4.329E-02.433 99.781 1.679E-02.168 99.949 5.098E-03 5.098E-02 100.000 Extraction Method: Maximum Likelihood. Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings 38 19

Goodness-of-fit Test Chi-Square df Sig. 32.497 26.177 H 0 : model fits in population H 1 : model does not fit in population Here: H 0 not rejected. Seems nice, but Sensible to sample size (small n usually large p-values) Moreover: Is H 0 ever exactly true in population? Alternative fitmeasures: RMSEA, AIC, BIC,... 39 JITTERY DISTRESS UPSET AFRAID SCARED INSPIRED EXCITED DETERMIN INTEREST ENTHUSIA Rotated Factor Matrix a Factor 1 2-7.75E-02.720 -.257.862 -.262.954 -.147.731-3.17E-02.705.903 -.168.824.161.857 -.372.804 -.249.892 -.267 Extraction Method: Maximum Likelihood. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations. 40 20

Types FA Common FA (CFA) ( Lisrel ) Analysis (CA) Exploratory Exploratory CFA Principal Analysis Confirmatory Confirmatory CFA Multiple Group Method 41 Measurement models Latent variabele X 1 Meas. Error T X 2 Meas. Error X n met X i : observed score on item X i T: Score on latent variable Meas. Error 42 21

Confirmatory common factor analysis Example model: F 1 F 2 X 2 X 1 Error 1 Error 2 X 3 Error 3 X 4 Error 4 43 Loadings: F1 F2 X1 x 0 X2 x 0 X3 0 x X4 0 x Asessment Model fit: Chi2-test, Fitmeasureas as RSMEA, SRMR x: estimated 0: fixed at 0 44 22

Software SPSS CEFA* Lisrel/ AMOS/ EQS/Mx* Mplus Testfact OPLM* IRT (beperkt ) Reliability maten PCA ** MGM Expl. CFA Conf. CFA *Free **Using Macro, to downloaden from http://www.gmw.rug.nl/~sda/ 45 23