The Small Strain TL C1 Plane Beam

Similar documents
Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 -

Finite Element Formulation for Plates - Handout 3 -

The Basics of FEA Procedure

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

Finite Element Method (ENGC 6321) Syllabus. Second Semester

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

Bending Stress in Beams

COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING OF FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATION USING ABAQUS

The elements used in commercial codes can be classified in two basic categories:

Elasticity Theory Basics

Beam, Plate, and Shell Elements Part I

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

Reliable FE-Modeling with ANSYS

FUNDAMENTAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS

Module 2. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Matrix Force Method. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Course in. Nonlinear FEM

CHAPTER 3. INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

3 Concepts of Stress Analysis

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy

Nonlinear analysis and form-finding in GSA Training Course

Back to Elements - Tetrahedra vs. Hexahedra

ACMSM - Computer Applications in Solids Mechanics

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF THICK PLATES SUBJECTED TO EARTQUAKE

State of Stress at Point

Design Analysis and Review of Stresses at a Point

CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES INTRODUCTION

Tutorial for Assignment #2 Gantry Crane Analysis By ANSYS (Mechanical APDL) V.13.0

EFFICIENT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF INDUSTRIAL SHEET METAL BENDING PROCESSES

Beam Deflections: Second-Order Method

Introduction to Beam. Area Moments of Inertia, Deflection, and Volumes of Beams

Section 16: Neutral Axis and Parallel Axis Theorem 16-1

Shear Center in Thin-Walled Beams Lab

Tower Cross Arm Numerical Analysis

Advanced Structural Analysis. Prof. Devdas Menon. Department of Civil Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

Chapter 5: Indeterminate Structures Slope-Deflection Method

Plates and Shells: Theory and Computation - 4D9 - Dr Fehmi Cirak (fc286@) Office: Inglis building mezzanine level (INO 31)

Development of Membrane, Plate and Flat Shell Elements in Java

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Modeling Beams on Elastic Foundations Using Plate Elements in Finite Element Method

Shell Elements in ABAQUS/Explicit

Structural Analysis - II Prof. P. Banerjee Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 02

A Simulation Study on Joint Velocities and End Effector Deflection of a Flexible Two Degree Freedom Composite Robotic Arm

Nonlinear Analysis Using Femap with NX Nastran

Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Biological Materials

Unit 6 Plane Stress and Plane Strain

ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL MEMBER SYSTEMS JEROME J. CONNOR NEW YORK : ':,:':,;:::::,,:

When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.

Introduction to the Finite Element Method (FEM)

FINITE ELEMENT : MATRIX FORMULATION. Georges Cailletaud Ecole des Mines de Paris, Centre des Matériaux UMR CNRS 7633

Laterally Loaded Piles

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

The HR Variational Principle of Elastostatics

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements

Stress Recovery 28 1

How To Design A Bevel And Hypoid Gear Drive

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

A quadrilateral 2-D finite element based on mixed interpolation of tensorial

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

AN EXPLANATION OF JOINT DIAGRAMS

Finite Elements for 2 D Problems

Linear Static Analysis of a Cantilever Beam Using Beam Library (SI Units)

On the Buckling Finite Element Analysis

How To Understand The Dynamics Of A Multibody System

Chapter 2. Derivation of the Equations of Open Channel Flow. 2.1 General Considerations

Lap Fillet Weld Calculations and FEA Techniques

Cylinder Head Gasket Contact Pressure Simulation for a Hermetic Compressor

METHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

Shear Forces and Bending Moments

CosmosWorks Centrifugal Loads

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

Statics of Structural Supports

Kirchhoff Plates: BCs and Variational Forms

Master s Theory Exam Spring 2006

THE DETERMINATION OF DELAMINATION STRAIN ENERGY RELEASE RATE OF COMPOSITE BI-MATERIAL INTERFACE

The Bending Strength of Pasta

Canyon Geometry Effects on Seismic SH-Wave scattering using three dimensional BEM

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS

ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF SPRING BACK EFFECTS IN A TYPICAL COLD ROLLED SHEET

Finite Element Simulation of Simple Bending Problem and Code Development in C++

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Cambridge, MA 02139

Conservative Systems 6 1

An Object-Oriented class design for the Generalized Finite Element Method programming

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

Technology of EHIS (stamping) applied to the automotive parts production

ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFICATE LEVEL

1 of 79 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering EOSC 433

An Overview of the Finite Element Analysis

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

CIVL 7/8117 Chapter 3a - Development of Truss Equations 1/80

Mechanics lecture 7 Moment of a force, torque, equilibrium of a body

Pre-requisites

Technical Report Example (1) Chartered (CEng) Membership

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7)

Master slave approach for the modelling of joints with dependent degrees of freedom in exible mechanisms

III. Compression Members. Design of Steel Structures. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Transcription:

. H The Small Strain TL C Plane Beam H

Appendix H: THE SMALL STRAIN TL C PLANE BEAM H H. SUMMARY This Appendix derives the discrete equations of a geometrically nonlinear, C (Hermitian), prismatic, plane beam-column in the framework of the Total Lagrangian (TL) description. The formulation is restricted to the three deformational degrees of freedom: d, θ and θ shown in Figure H.. The element rigid body motions have been removed by forcing the transverse deflections at the end nodes to vanish. The strains are assumed to be small while the cross section rotations θ are small but finite. Given the foregoing kinematic limitations, this element is evidently of no use per se in geometrically nonlinear analysis. Its value is in providing the local equations for a TL/CR formulation H. FORMULATION OF GOVERING EQUATIONS H.. Kinematics We consider a geometrically nonlinear, prismatic, homogenous, isotropic elastic, plane beam element that deforms in the x, y plane as shown in Figure H.. The element has cross section area A and moment of inertia I in the reference configuration, and elastic modulus E. y -d/ θ d/ C R L L C θ x Figure H. Kinematics of TL Hermitian beam element The plane motion of the beam is described by the two dimensional displacement field {u x (x, y), u y (x, y)} where u x and u y are the axial and transverse displacement components, respectively, of arbitrary points within the element. The rotation of the cross section is θ(x), which is assumed small. The following kinematic assumptions of thin beam theory are used [ ux (x, y) = u a x (x) y ua y (x) ] [ u a ] x u y (x, y) u a y (x) = x (x) yθ(x) u a y (x) (H.) where u a x and ua y denote the displacements of the neutral axes, and θ(x) = ua y / x is the rotation of the cross section. The three degrees of freedom of the beam element are ] u e = [ d θ θ (H.) H

H 3 H. FORMULATION OF GOVERING EQUATIONS H.. Strains We introduce the notation ɛ = u x x, = θ x = u a y x. (H.3) for engineering axial strain and beam curvature, respectively. The exact Green-Lagrange measure of axial strain is e = u ( ) x x + ux + x ( ) u y = ɛ y + x (ɛ y) + θ (H.4) This can be expressed in terms of the displacement gradients as follows: e = h T g + gt Hg = c T g (H.5) where g = u a x / x u a y / x u a y / x = [ ɛ θ ], h =, H = y [ y y y ] (H.6) We simplify this expression by dropping all y dependent terms form the H matrix: Ĥ = [ ] (H.7) The simplified axial strain is e = h T g + gt Ĥg = ɛ y + ɛ + θ (H.8) The rational for this selective simplification is that e a = ɛ + ɛ is the GL mean axial strain. If the ɛ term is retained, a simpler geometric stiffness is obtained. The term θ is the main nonlinear effect contributed by the section rotations. The vectors that appear in the CCF formulation of TL finite elements discussed in Chapters - are + ɛ + b = h + Hg = θ, c = h + ɛ Hg = θ, (H.9) y y H 3

Appendix H: THE SMALL STRAIN TL C PLANE BEAM H 4 N M C M V N V V M M C N V Figure H.. Stress resultants in reference and current configurations. Configurations shown offset for clarity. N H..3 Stresses and Stress Resultants The stress resultants in the reference configuration are N, M and M. The initial shear force is V = (M M )/L. The axial force N and transvese shear force V are constant along the element, whereas the bending moment M (x) is linearly interpolated from M = M ( x/l ) + M x/l. See Figure H. for sign conventions. The initial PK axial stress is computed using beam theory: s = N M y (H.) A I Denote by N, V and M the stress resultants in the current configuration. Whereas N and V are constant along the element, M = M(x) varies linearly along the length because this is a Hermitian model, which relies on cubic transverse displacements. Consequently we will define its variation by the two node values M and M. The shear V is recovered from equilibrium as V = (M M )/L, which is also constant. The PK axial stress in the current state is s = s + Ee = s + Ec T g,or inserting (H.9): s = s + E ( ɛ + ɛ + θ y ) (H.) H..4 Constitutive Equations Integrating (H.) over the cross section one gets the constitutive equations in terms of resultants: N = sda= s A + EA (ɛ + ɛ + θ ) = N + EA (e a + θ ), A M = ys da = M + EI A (H.) H..5 Strain Energy Density H 4

H 5 H. FORMULATION OF GOVERING EQUATIONS We shall use the CCF formulation presented in Chapter to derive the stiffness equations. Using α = β = (not a spectral form) one obtains the core energy of a beam particle as U = ( + ɛ) + 4 θ 3 y 3 θ y( + 3 ɛ) = gt E 3 θ 4 (ɛ + θ ) + 3 (ɛ y) 3 yθ + s g y( + 3 ɛ) yθ y 3 (H.3) Integration over this cross section yields the strain energy per unit of beam length: U A = gt A (Ecc T + s H) da g = gt ( + ɛ) A ( + ɛ)θ A E ( + ɛ)θ A 4 θ A + N g I (H.4) To obtain the element energy it is necessary to specify the variation of ɛ, θ and along the beam. At this point shape functions have to be introduced. H..6 Shape Functions Define the isoparametric coordinate ξ = x/l. The displacement interpolation is taken to be the same used for the linear beam element: [ u a x u a = ξ ] d y 8 L ( ξ) ( + ξ) 8 L ( + ξ) θ. (H.5) ( ξ) θ From this the displacement gradients are ɛ g = θ = d L 4 L (ξ )(3ξ + ) 4 L ( + ξ)(3ξ ) θ = Gu e. (H.6) 3ξ 3ξ + The rotation θ varies quadritically and the curvature θ linearly. The node values are obtained on setting ξ =±: ɛ g = θ = ɛ L u e, g L = θ = L u e (H.7) 4 L 4 H..7 Element Energy The strain energy of the element can be now obtained by expressing the gradients g = Gu e and integrating over the length. the result can be expressed as U e = L L U A da= U A L dξ = (ue ) T K U u e (H.8) H 5 θ

Appendix H: THE SMALL STRAIN TL C PLANE BEAM H 6 where the energy stiffness is the sum of three contributions: K U = K U a + KU b + KU N. These come from the axial deformations, bending deformations and initial stress, respectively: K U a = EA L K U b = EI L ( + ( + ɛ) ɛ)(4θ θ )L 6 ( + ɛ)(4θ θ )L (θ 3θ θ + θ )L 6 84 ( + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 6 68 4, K U N = N L 4 L /5 L /3. L /3 L /5 ( + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L 6 ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 68, (θ 3θ θ + θ )L 84 (H.9) H.3 INTERNAL FORCE The internal force p is obtained as the derivative ( ) p = U e u = K U + e (ue ) T KU u e = K p u e u e (H.) The internal force stiffness is again the sum of three contributions: K p = K p a + Kp b + Kp N. These come from the axial deformations, bending deformations and initial stress, respectively: K p a = EA L K p b = EI L + 3 ɛ + (3 + ɛ)(4θ ɛ θ )L (3 + ɛ)(4θ θ )L (θ 3θ θ + θ )L 4 (3 + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 84 4, K p N = N L 4 L /5 L /3. L /3 L /5 (3 + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 84, (θ 3θ θ + θ )L 4 (H.) H.4 TANGENT STIFFNESS The tangent stiffness K is obtained as the derivative K = p ) (K u = r + (u e ) T Kr u e e u e (H.) This is again the sum of three contributions: K = K a + K b + K N, which come from the axial H 6

H 7 H.4 TANGENT STIFFNESS deformations, bending deformations and current stress, respectively: K a = EA L K b = EI L ( + ɛ) ( + ɛ)(4θ θ )L 3 ( + ɛ)(4θ θ )L (θ 3θ θ + θ )L 3 ( + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 3 4 4, K N = N 3. 4 3L 4L L L 4L The material stiffness is K M = K a + K b and the geometric stiffness is K G = K N. ( + ɛ)( θ + 4θ )L 3 ( 3θ + 4θ θ 3θ )L 4, (θ 3θ θ + θ )L (H.3) H 7