Marcellus Shale Play*

Similar documents
Upstream Developments Generate Growing Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids Supply! Alan Farquharson, SVP - Reservoir Engineering & Economics!

Quick Look Determination of Oil-in-Place in Oil Shale Resource Plays*

Geologic Criteria for Eastern Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test)

Assessment of Factors Influencing CO 2 Storage Capacity and Injectivity in Eastern U.S. Gas Shales

Figure 2-10: Seismic Well Ties for Correlation and Modelling. Table 2-2: Taglu Mapped Seismic Horizons

Unconventional Challenges: Integrated Analysis for Unconventional Resource Development Robert Gales VP Resource Development

New Yo r k Marc e l l us and Utica Shales. 130,000 net acres Oil, natural gas liquids, and dry gas Access to major pipelines

Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources:

RESERVOIR EVALUATION. The volume of hydrocarbons in a reservoir can be calculated:

Petrophysical Well Log Analysis for Hydrocarbon exploration in parts of Assam Arakan Basin, India

Nautilus Global Schedule 2016

Responding to New Discoveries: Workflow and Strategies for Conquering the Data Gap and Overcoming Stuck-In-Rut Thinking *

ASX Announcement GOOD OIL CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OUR FOCUS. The Company Announcement Officer ASX Ltd via electronic lodgement COOPER BASIN

Search and Discovery Article #40356 (2008) Posted October 24, Abstract

Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

PRESIDENT ENERGY PLC. ( President or the Company ) OIL DISCOVERY IN PARAGUAYAN CHACO

Topics: The Petroleum System. Origin of Petroleum. Arguments for biogenic origin. Google search : Origin of Petroleum : Hugoton Gas Field (Kansas)

INDEPENDENT REPORTS CONFIRM SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR LINC ENERGY S SHALE OIL IN THE ARCKARINGA BASIN

Investigating laboratory-generated pyrobitumen precursors for unconventional reservoir characterization: a geochemical & petrographic approach.

Excerpts for Rock Talk Vol 7 No.2 Colorado Geological Survey

Range Resources Corporation Company Presentation April 2013

Status of existing and possible new production in Greece. S. Xenopoulos, N. Roussos, Hellenic Petroleum S.A., Athens, Greece

Tu-P07-02 Workaround to Build Robust Facies Model with Limited Input Data - A Case Study from North West Kuwait

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

FAULT SEAL ANALYSIS: Mapping & modelling. EARS5136 slide 1

Calibration of Uncertainty (P10/P90) in Exploration Prospects*

Building an Unconventional Gas Business in Australia:

Building the Wireline Database and Calculation of Reservoir Porosity

Frio Formation of the Gulf Coast* By Michael D. Burnett 1 and John P. Castagna 2

EnerCom The Oil & Gas Conference. An Integrated Workflow for Unconventional Reservoirs

Rex Energy Corporate Presentation. January 2016

ONSHORE PETROLEUM ATLAS, NOVA SCOTIA

RELINQUISHMENT REPORT FOR LICENCE P.1442 BLOCK 48/9d

Data Mining and Exploratory Statistics to Visualize Fractures and Migration Paths in the WCBS*

Unconventional Gas in Italy: the Ribolla Basin*

Search and Discovery Article #40256 (2007) Posted September 5, Abstract

1. Michigan Geological History Presentation (Michigan Natural Resources)

Renewable Energy from Depleted Oil Fields using Geothermal Energy. Ramsey Kweik Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab

ADX ENERGY. Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink

Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: A 2,600 Well Study of Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) 2015 Update

Hydrocarbon Production from the South Ellwood Field and the Effects on Naturally Occurring Oil and Gas Seeps*

The Growth of U.S. Natural Gas: An Uncertain Outlook for U.S. and World Supply

Microseismic Fracture Mapping Results in the Woodford Shale

Search and Discovery Article #60049 (2010) Posted April 28, 2010

PRESIDENT ENERGY PLC. ( President or the Company ) PARAGUAY UPDATE

Structural Style of the Assam Shelf and Schuppen Belt, A &AA Basin, India*

Introduction: Basic Well Completion Concepts

Researching the 3D structure of the valley and ridge province around the Tennessee salient.

Integration of reservoir simulation with time-lapse seismic modelling

High Salinity, Low Activity Oil Mud Improves Performance in Near Salt Drilling

Eagle Ford Shale Exploration Regional Geology meets Geophysical Technology. Galen Treadgold Bruce Campbell Bill McLain

Emerging Oil and Gas Development in Northwestern New Mexico HORIZONTAL GALLUP / MANCOS PLAY

Investigations into the Oil & Gas Resource Potential of North Carolina Onshore Lands and State Waters (abridged presentation)

Overview of the Hugoton Asset Management Project (HAMP) southwest Kansas and Oklahoma Panhandle

Deep Geothermal energy and groundwater in

THE OIL & GAS CONFERENCE

Range Resources Announces Merger With Memorial Resource Development. Conference Call Slides

Hydrocarbon Migration An Old Friend or Foe?*

Reservoir Characterization of Gandhar Pay Sands by integrating NMR log data with conventional open hole logs A Case Study.

PERSPECTIVE OF SHALE GAS PROSPECTION IN POLAND

Paper ID : Conceptual Exploration Abu Khashab Oil Discovery IPR/OVL Block XXIV, Syria

NOVEMBER 2015 UPDATE

SFD Case Example: Thrust Fold Belt Setting; Canadian Foothills Limestone & Burnt Timber Fields

EIA/ARI World Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment

Stock Pitch. Westen Koorbusch, Travis Wolf, Zachary Dukoff, Udit Agrawal, Isaac Fraynd

Modelling and Simulation Multi-stage Fracturing Propagation in Tight Reservoir through Horizontal Well

Reservoir Modelling and Interpretation with Lamé s Parameters: A Grand Banks Case Study

Stability Assessment of Chamshir Dam Based on DEM, South West Zagros

Geothermal resources. Grado-1 borehole Future plans. Dep. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trieste

Predictive Analytics Methods Begin to Take Hold in E&P

3-D Printing Artificial Reservoir Rocks to Test Their Petrophysical Properties*

March 21, 1972 Technical Service 8269CC (Addendum) Exploration Manager Amoco Europe, Incorporated Pall Mall London S.W.I, England.

Suzanne Minter. Manager, Oil and Gas Consulting BENTEK Energy. Natural Gas Outlook

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 17 JUNE 2014

source: Zalán et al., 1990 Area = 1,127,400 km 2 Stratigraphic record ranging in age from Late Ordovician to Late Cretaceous Thickness ~ 7,000 m

Structural Origin of the Claremont Anticline, Nova Scotia: Has new seismic solved an old problem?

What are the controls for calcium carbonate distribution in marine sediments?

Groundwater Training Course SOPAC, April Electromagnetic (EM) Induction method for Groundwater Investigations

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Figure 1. The only information we have between wells is the seismic velocity.

EarthStudy 360. Full-Azimuth Angle Domain Imaging and Analysis

Analysis of GS-11 Low-Resistivity Pay in Main Gandhar Field, Cambay Basin, India A Case Study

AGM Presentation. 24 June 2013

Geologic History Review

Santuario Block, Mature Fields South Region. Executive Summary. Block. Santuario

GEOLOGIC MAPS. PURPOSE: To be able to understand, visualize, and analyze geologic maps

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Well-logging Correlation Analysis and correlation of well logs in Rio Grande do Norte basin wells

Norwest Energy NL. Northern Perth Basin Farm-In Opportunities. PESA Deal Day Brisbane Shelley Robertson Asset Manager.

Storing of CO 2 offshore Norway, Criteria for evaluation of safe storage sites

REPORT. Results of petrological and petrophysical investigation of rock samples from the Siljan impact crater (Mora area)

EGAS. Ministry of Petroleum

Broadband seismic to support hydrocarbon exploration on the UK Continental Shelf

Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko. Basic Geophysical Concepts

Interview with Vello Kuuskraa

Brasil Round 4 Recôncavo Basin

May October Acquiring, Exploring and Developing Oil and Gas Projects in North and South America TSX.V: PTP

Georgia Performance Standards Framework for Science Grade 6. Unit Organizer: Water in Earth s Processes. (Approximate Time: 5-6 Weeks)

14.2 Theory Compton Scattering and Photo-Electric Absorption

Transcription:

AV An overview of Some Key Factors Controlling Well Productivity in Core Areas of the Appalachian Basin Marcellus Shale Play* W. A. Zagorski 1, Douglas C. Bowman 1, Martin Emery 1, and Gregory R. Wrightstone 1 Search and Discovery Article #110147 (2011) Posted June 13, 2011 *Adapted from oral presentation at Session, U.S. Active and Emerging Plays--Paleozoic Basins and Cretaceous of Rockies, AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, April 10-13, 2011 1 Range Resource Corporation, Canonsburg, PA (bzagorski@rangeresources.com). Abstract The Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale is one of the premier gas shale plays of North America in terms of total gas resource, extent, production rates, and economic potential. The organic-rich shale of the Marcellus was deposited in a foreland basin setting that was sediment starved and allowed for accumulation and preservation of the organic material. The Marcellus Shale Formation is positioned in the lower portion of the Hamilton Group, which is bounded above by the Middle Devonian Tully Limestone and below by the Lower Devonian Onondaga Limestone. The Upper and Lower Marcellus Shale are divided by the Cherry Valley/Purcell Limestone. Two major cores areas have developed in the 500-mi long, southwest-northeast trending Marcellus Shale play fairway. The two core areas display unique combinations of controlling geologic factors. Thickness, organic content, intra-organic matter porosity, overpressure, and maturity are some of the key Marcellus gas productivity factors. The Marcellus thickens from approximately 100 ft average gross thickness in southwestern Pennsylvania to over 300 ft average gross thickness in north-central Pennsylvania. High organic content and the associated porosity and greater overpressure are key gas productivity factors for the Marcellus Shale. Organic content of the Marcellus can be inferred from GR- and density-log data calibrated with core measurements. The high organic content facies of the Marcellus is the key reservoir rock in terms of hydrocarbon storage. The organic content varies from approximately 2 to 15 wt% average in southwestern Pennsylvania to approximately 4 to 10 wt% average in north-central Pennsylvania and can be related to greater organic maturity to the north. The overpressure mechanism is conversion of liquid hydrocarbons to gas with increased organic maturity. The key pore type in the Marcellus Shale is intra-organic porosity identified by FIB/SEM technology. The intra-organic porosity displays a degree of connectivity and is probably responsible for a significant portion of the Marcellus Shale productivity and gas in-place. Intraorganic pores range from <10 to 200+ nm. Other pore types include inter-particulate, inter-crystalline, and microcracks. Copyright AAPG. Serial rights given by author. For all other rights contact author directly.

The major core areas of the Marcellus Shale play are examined and compared in terms of the regional thickness, structure, thermal maturity, overpressure trends. Within each core producing region we illustrate the various pore types within key reservoir units using various core, log, thin-section, standard SEM, and Ion Milled SEM work. Reference Cate, A.S., 1961, Subsurface structure of plateau region of north-central and western Pennsylvania on top of the Oriskany Formation: Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Map 9.

An Overview of Some Key Factors Controlling Well Productivity in Core Areas of the Appalachian Basin Marcellus Shale Play W. A. Zagorski, Douglas C. Bowman, Martin Emery, and Gregory R. Wrightstone 2011 AAPG National Conference Houston, Texas June 3, 2011 l 1

Marcellus Shale Play Core Areas NE PA Core Line of X-Section SW PA Core Marcellus Shale Play Area 28,179,200 ac 44,030 mi 2 Reserve Potential 485 TCFG Current Production 2.3 BCFG/D June 3, 2011 l 2

Regional Stratigraphic Cross-Section SW NE TULLY LS MAHANTANGO MARCELLUS SH SW CORE Very thin, condensed section. High TOC. High NTG Ratio. Tully to Marcellus interval condensed. SW PA sedimentation rate lower. Key pay intervals are MFS s in Marcellus. NE CORE Very thick, expanded section. Lower Avg. TOC. Low NTG Ratio. Tully to Marcellus interval expanded. NE PA sedimentation rate significantly higher. Key pay intervals are MFS s in Marcellus. June 3, 2011 l 3

Key Structural Features Affecting Marcellus Shale Presence of Salina below Marcellus interval. Basement Faulting associated with Rome Trough Cross strike wrench faulting June 3, 2011 l 4

Regional Pressure Trends Marcellus Shale Closely related to burial history associated with Rome Trough. Presence of underlying Salina interval is key to pressure gradients. NE Core Area Approximately 0.50 to 0.82 psi/ft. SW Core Area Approximately 0.455 psi/ft to 0.70 psi/ft. June 3, 2011 l 5

Marcellus Thermal Maturity Patterns NE Core Ro 1.5% to 3.5% Eastern Limit defined at approximately 3.5% Ro Appears to have more mature (deeper) burial history. NGL production not yet well defined. SW Core Ro 0.95% to 2.5% Western limit approximately.95% Ro Coincident with Rome Trough NGL play well defined at 0.95% Ro to 1.4% Ro June 3, 2011 l 6

Marcellus Shale Gross Thickness NE Core Marcellus gross thickness over 150 feet to over 350 feet. Sedimentation rates appear significantly higher in NE play. Depositional patterns influenced both by position of Rome Trough and by NW-by- SE-trending cross strike faulting. SW Core Marcellus gross thickness 50 feet to 200 feet. Sedimentation rates appear lower in SW and favor the preservation of organic matter. Deposition patterns influenced both by position of the Rome trough and by NWby-SE-trending cross strike faulting. June 3, 2011 l 7

Marcellus Drilling Depth Map NE Core Established production in Marcellus between 3,500 feet to over 8,500 feet. SW Core Established Marcellus production between 5,000 feet to 8,000 feet. June 3, 2011 l 8

Regional Oriskany Structure * Major Fold Trends NE Core NE Core situated with major fold belt with relatively high amplitude folding. Salt thickness significantly higher in NE play affecting density of fracturing and faulting in the Marcellus. SW Core SW Core located in lower fold amplitude areas farther from Allegheny Structural Front. Salt thickness significantly lower resulting in more potential deformation, fracturing and faulting in the overlying Marcellus. Modified from Cate (1961) June 3, 2011 l 9

Vclay Comparison between SW & NE PA NE Play Clay volume of Marcellus interval significant elevated and related to sedimentation rate and proximity to source. Patterns appear affected by NW/SE basement fault trends. SW Play Clay volume in SW play significantly lower than NE play. Sedimentation rate and proximity to sources potential links. Patterns appear related to NW/SE trending basement faults. From Chaoqing Yang, Range Resources June 3, 2011 l 10

Vcalcite Comparison between SW & NE PA NE Play NE Play shows overall lower calcite content and increased clay content suggesting closer proximity to source. Susquehanna core area distinctly calcite-rich. Distinct basement influence on mineralogy. SW Play SW Play area distinctly more calcite-rich suggesting distal position from source area. Distinct basement influence on mineralogy. From Chaoqing Yang, Range Resources June 3, 2011 l 11

SW PA Marcellus Core Area SW Core Area GIP- 40 BCF/mile to 150 BCF/mile. IPS 1.0 Mmcfe/d to over 20 Mmcfe/d per lateral completion. EUR 2 Bcfeq to over 12 Bcfeq per lateral. NGL s Significant, up to 250,000 Bbls. per lateral in wet areas. NGL-rich areas have superior economics over dry gas areas. June 3, 2011 l 12

SW PA Marcellus Type Log Middle Devonian Upper Devonian Onon. LS Marcellus SH Mahantango Tully LS Burkett SH 0 GR_1 500 ( GAPI ) 6 HCAL_1 16 ( IN ) MD 1:600 Feet 6200 6300 Very High GR 6400 6500 6600.2 RLA3_1 2000 30 DPHZ_1-10 ( OHMM ) ( % ).2 RLA4_1 2000 30 NPHI_1-10 ( OHMM ) ( % ).2 RLA5_1 2000 0 PEFZ_1 20 ( OHMM ) ( B/e ) mfs Triple-Combo Log SW CORE Very thin, condensed section. High Net to Gross Ratio. Higher TOC. Higher Porosity and Permeability. Tully to Marcellus interval condensed. SW PA sedimentation rate lower. Key pay intervals are MFS s in Marcellus. Very High Res Low Sw High Φ den mfs 153 ft 287 ft June 3, 2011 l 13

SW PA Marcellus Shale Analysis Log Key Pore Types SW PA Organic Rich Shales Intra-organic Present in all successful gas shales HC don t migrate far; organic C sorbent for HC Very low Sw Key pore type High Vol% TOC Inter-crystalline/particulate Between pyrite crystals in framboidal pyrite Between platy clay crystals or detrital clay grains/plates Higher Sw Very Low Sw High Sg Marcellus Shale 159 ft Inter-Particulate Φ Intra-Organic Φ Interxlln Φ High Φ Porosity: 7.3-12.3% BV GF Porosity: 5.6-10.5% BV Permeability: 373-1379 nd TOC: 4.5-12.9 wt% Ro: 0.85-1.86% June 3, 2011 l 14

SW PA Marcellus Type Log Pore Types/SEM Pore Types SW PA Organic Rich/Calcite-Rich Marcellus Shale Intra-organic Present in all successful gas shales HC don t migrate far; organic C sorbent for HC Very low Sw Key pore type Inter-crystalline/particulate Between pyrite crystals in framboidal pyrite Between platy clay crystals or detrital clay grains/plates Higher Sw Traditional SEM Method Ar-Ion Beam Milling Method June 3, 2011 l 15

SW PA Marcellus Intra-Organic Porosity 3D Intra-Organic Φ High surface area Ion-Milled Sample Intra-organic porosity key storage component of shales. Contains both free and adsorbed gas. Low or no Sw June 3, 2011 l 16

NE PA Marcellus Core Area NE Core Area GIP 40 BCF/mile to 180 BCF/mile IPS 1.0 Mmcfe/d to over 21 Mmcfpd. EUR s 2 Bcf to 20 Bcf per lateral. NGL Not as significant to date as SW PA core area. June 3, 2011 l 17

NE PA Marcellus Type Log Middle Devonian U Dev Burkett SH Tully LS Mahantango 0 GR 500 ( GAPI ) 6 HCAL 16 ( IN ) MD 1:1200 Feet 7400 7500 7600 7700 7800 7900 8000 8100 8200.2 AHT30 2000 ( OHMM ).2 AHT60 2000 ( OHMM ).2 AHT90 2000 ( OHMM ) Lower GR 8300 30 DPHZ -10 ( % ) 30 ENPH -10 ( % ) 0 PEFZ 20 ( B/e ) NE CORE Very thick, expanded section. Lower Avg. TOC. Low Net to Gross Ratio. Lower porosity and Permeability. Tully to Marcellus interval expanded. NE PA sedimentation rate significantly higher. Key pay intervals are MFS s in Marcellus. Triple-Combo Log Lower Res Higher Sw 1151 ft 8400 Marcellus SH 8500 8600 Cherry Valley LS Onondaga LS Lower Φ den mfs mfs 259 ft 8700 Needmore S H Oriskany SS 8800 June 3, 2011 l 18

NE PA Marcellus Shale Analysis Log Higher Vclay Higher Sw Marcellus Shale 240 ft Interparticulate & Interxlln Φ Intra-Organic Φ Lower Vol% TOC Low Φ Porosity: 4.6-11.1% BV GF Porosity: 3.9-10.0% BV Permeability: 50-200 nd TOC: 4.4-9.7 wt% Ro: 1.23-2.56 June 3, 2011 l 19

NE PA Marcellus Type Log Pore Types/SEM Pore Types NE PA Clay Rich Marcellus Shale Intra-organic Present in all successful gas shales HC don t migrate far; organic C sorbent for HC Very low Sw Key pore type Inter-crystalline/particulate Between pyrite crystals in framboidal pyrite Between platy clay crystals or detrital clay grains/plates Higher Sw Traditional SEM Method Ar-Ion Beam Milling Method June 3, 2011 l 20

NE PA Marcellus Intra-Organic Porosity 3D Intra-Organic Φ Intra-organic porosity key storage component of shales. Contains both free and adsorbed gas. Low or no Sw. Photo Courtesy of Chris Laughrey Ion-Milled Sample June 3, 2011 l 21

Comments & Summary Organic content/concentration and associated intraorganic porosity at higher LOM are key factors for Marcellus Shale GIP and productivity Less organic content and increased Vclay towards the NE Core area Higher intra-organic porosity and overpressure are related to maturity Increased conversion of kerogen to HC and reduction of liquid HC to gas result in greater intra-organic porosity Liquid HC converted to gas, in a relatively fixed pore space, is the overpressure mechanism SW Core and NE Core areas have similar Marcellus productivity (especially when liquids are included) despite the NE Core area having thicker gross Marcellus June 3, 2011 l 22