County Health Economics Profile Jefferson County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

Similar documents
Demographic and Economic Profile. Mississippi. Updated May 2006

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Miami County, Kansas. Employment and Workforce Profile. June Population: 32,822 Median Household Income: $60,622 Area: 590 square miles

Wages of Employed Texans Who Attended Texas Public Schools

Demographic and Economic Profile. North Carolina. Updated June 2006

Summary of Employment, Demographics, and Commuting Patterns for Marion County, Florida

Commonwealth of Virginia Job Vacancy Survey

DAWSON CITY LABOUR SKILLS INVENTORY SURVEY

North Bay Industry Sector Rankings (By County) October 2015 Jim Cassio

Miami-Dade County - Downtown Miami Employment Center Census Tracts Selected for Analysis

A Portrait of Seattle s Low-Income Working Population

Survey of Business Owners Veteran-Owned Firms

Fort McPherson. Atlanta, GA MSA. Drivers of Economic Growth February Prepared By: chmuraecon.com

REGIONAL SNAPSHOT. SET FOREVER Region, Louisiana

Virginia. Private and Public Educational Services Profile

Turning SIC to NAICS, where do we stand?

Demographic and Economic Data for Ocean Beach Hospital and Medical Clinics in Pacific County, Washington

Martin County - Stuart Employment Center Census Block Groups Selected for Analysis. Prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council.

Hawaii New Business Formation an analysis of business birth, deaths, and survival rates

SELECTED POPULATION PROFILE IN THE UNITED STATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

The Economic Impact of Fire Damage on Wyoming s Economy from a Business Perspective

A Labour Economic Profile of New Brunswick

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2011

Small Business Data Assess Your Competition Define Your Customers

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2010

Liberty County, Florida

These data were developed in cooperation with, and partially funded by, the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)

Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington

The Economic Impact of the New Hospital on the Economy of Drumright, Creek County, Oklahoma

Workforce Overview Greenville, South Carolina

Calgary Small Businesses: Fact Sheet

HOSPITAL INDUSTRY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

Northeast Minnesota Labor Market Trends Pathways 2 Postsecondary Summit October 10, 2014

Women in the Workforce

COUNTY PROFILE lauderdale county

Nonfatal Workplace Injuries and Illnesses in Maryland for 2010

APPENDIX 7 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

Jones. County Rank Census

Monmouth County, NJ Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy:

St. Louis Region Labor Market Analysis

Social Work. Occupation Report CIP

A SNAPSHOT OF ALPENA COUNTY

Vigo County, Indiana Economic Overview

Bridging the Gap STEM Jobs in Ohio. Cassie Barlow, PhD Executive Director Center for Workforce Development Wright State University June 2015

Introduction. Introduction, Contd. Introduction, Contd.

REGIONAL QUARTERLY REPORT

Nevada enacts Commerce Tax effective July 1, 2015

Changes in Self-Employment: 2010 to 2011

College Park Latitude: Edgewater Dr & W Princeton St, Orlando, FL Longitude: Ring: 1.5 Miles

Saskatchewan Small Business Profile 2015

Demographic / Economic Indicators

Nissan Corporate Headquarters Relocation to Cool Springs, Williamson County

Arkansas Property Tax: Revenue, Assessments & Rates

I. HEALTH ASSESSMENT B. SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

VERMONT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES, BENEFITS, CONTRIBUTIONS AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY CALENDAR YEAR 2014

Who Would be Affected by an Increase in Seattle s Minimum Wage? Report for the City of Seattle, Income Inequality Advisory Committee March 21, 2014

Demographic, Socio-Economic, Schooling, and Labor Market Indicators for Year Olds in the City of Hartford

Healthcare Industry Employment Trends in the Richmond MSA. Prepared for Resource s Healthcare Industry Employment Summit

COUNTY PROFILE tipton county

Veteran-owned Businesses and their Owners Data from the Census Bureau s Survey of Business Owners

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

Supplier Diversity Program. Ensure a diversity of small businesses work with the Smithsonian to accomplish the Institution s mission.

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

DRAFT. All NAICS. 3-Digit NAICS BP C 3 P 76 X 0 BP C 0 P 0 X 2 OC C 29 P 44 X 35 OC C 0 P 0 X 2 MH C 96 MH C 8 P 37 X 62 P 1107 X 587

COUNTY PROFILE fayette county

Haverhill. Change in 58,969 60,953 1,984

2008 Corporate Recruiters Survey New York and New Jersey Regional Outlook

Nebraska Department of Economic Development. Angel Investment Tax Credit. Qualified Small Business Certification Application Form.

Clarksville Campus. Workforce Investment Area 8

Business-Facts: 3 Digit NAICS Summary 2014

Economic Impact of Skidmore College on Saratoga County

Minorities in Business: A Demographic Review of Minority Business Ownership

Workforce Training Results Report December 2008

Southwest Region Labor Market Analysis

Workforce Trends In and Occupational Forecasts For Northern Virginia,

August, 2005 A COMPARISON OF THE BUSINESS REGISTERS USED BY THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS AND THE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS

How To Complete The Southwest Moline Council Of Governments (Scoge) Regional Business Broadband Survey

Richmond. County Rank Census

Business-Facts: 3 Digit NAICS Summary 2015

Professional and Business Services Employment Trends in the Richmond MSA

Health Care Employment Projections:

OCCUPATIONS & WAGES REPORT

In order to maintain its position as a global economic leader and

Tools for Understanding Economic Change in Communities: Economic Base Analysis and Shift-Share Analysis

Retirement Readiness in New York City: Trends in Plan Sponsorship, Participation and Income Security

2008 Corporate Recruiters Survey California Regional Outlook

The traditional work schedule for an

COMMUNITY COLLEGES of SPOKANE GAP ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY OF AEROSPACE PROGRAMS

Home-Based Workers in the United States: 2010 Household Economic Studies

The Economic Census & Economic Programs Overview and Exercises

Workplace Injuries and Illnesses Safety (WIIS) Report

Employment and Wages for Alberta Workers with a Post-Secondary Education

The History of NAICS

Attraction and Retention: The Impact and Prevalence of Work-Life & Benefit Programs. research. A Research Report by WorldatWork October 2007

LAS VEGAS MAINSTREET COMMUNITY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Network Design and Classification of Enterprise Establishments

Healthcare Sector Profile for the Baton Rouge RLMA Parishes. Employment and Wage Trends 1 St Quarter 2013 for the Healthcare Sector by Parish

2015 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review. Employment. Unemployment. Economic Regions. Migration. Indigenous People. Industries

Transcription:

County Health Economics Profile Jefferson County, extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles Demographics Jefferson County, United States Total Population, 2015 (Census) 7,507 2,992,333 321,418,820 Percent Change in Total Population, 2011-2014 (Census) -0.9% 0.5% 3.1% Percent of the Population that is Non-white, 2014 (Census) 86.27% 40.7% 26.2% Pct of Population that is Older than 64 years, 2014 (Census) 13.0% 13.5% 13.7% Percent of the Population in Poverty, 2014 (SAIPE) 38.5% 21.9% 15.5% Pct of the Population under 18 in Poverty, 2014 Estimate (SAIPE) 45.2% 30.7% 21.7% Current Median Household Income, 2014 Estimate (SAIPE) $26,408 $39,738 $53,657 Not Covered by Health Insurance 2014 (Census) 13.6% 16.8% 14.2% Covered by Private Health Insurance 2014 (Census) 40.4% 57.0% 65.8% Covered by Public Health Insurance 2014 (Census) 53.7% 36.9% 31.1% Economic Impact of Healthcare 2015 EMSI/IMPLAN Direct Impact Mult Total Impact Output (Sales) $8,386,375 1.23 $10,316,297 Labor Income $5,940,676 1.06 $6,298,157 Employment 114 1.15 131 Economic Impact of Healthcare 2015 EMSI/IMPLAN 482 478 475-7 479 483 480 Jobs Earnings Hospitals 85 $7,575,370 Outpatient Care 0 $0 Office of prov. 69 $3,662,244 Med/diag labs 0 $0 Nur & Res Care 0 $0 Home health 45 $1,981,755

Gross County/State Product (Bureau of Economic Analysis) Jefferson County, % Chg in County % of County GCP s (Millions of dollars) 2011 2015 2011 2015 11-15 2015 All industry total 154 179 96,840 107,100 16.3% 100.0% Health care and social assistance 8.1 12.3 7,226 7,915 52.2% 6.9% Ambulatory Health Care Services 5.9 8.6 2,683 2,952 45.6% 4.8% All Hospitals/Res Care Facilities 0.0 0.0 3,272 3,468 N/A 0.0% Social Assistance 2.2 3.7 1,271 1,495 70.1% 2.1% Top Health & Social Assistance Employment s 2015 EMSI NAICS 2015 Jobs Ann Earn/Job Gen Med/Surg Hosp (Pub/Priv) 191 $49,007 6244 Child Day Care Services 89 $27,707 6211 Offices of Physicians 25 $70,743 Top Health & Social Assistance Occupation s 2015 EMSI SOC 2015 Jobs Median Hr Earn Total 183 $22 Health Occupations per 100,000 Population (2015) EMSI 29-1140 Registered Nurses 64 $22 31-1010 Nursing/Psych/& Home Health Aides 24 $10 29-2050 Health Pract Spprt Tech & Techns 14 $13 29-2010 Clinical Lab Techs & Techns 12 $18 29-2030 Diagnostic Related Techs & Techns 10 $20 Occup Physicians/Surgeons (all types) 67 Reg Nurses/Nurse Pract/Phys Assts 919 Lic Practical/Vocational Nurses 67 Technologist/Technicians (all types) 746 Nursing/Psy/Home Health Aides 320 For further information, contact Alan Barefield at 662.325.7995 or alan.barefield@msstate.edu.

MISSISSIPPI COUNTY ECONOMIC PROFILES DATA KEY Total Population, 2015 These data were obtained from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey five year estimates tables. http:// www.census.gov Percent Change in Total Population, 2011-2015 These data were obtained from the 2006-2011 and 2011-2015 American Community Survey five year estimates tables. Percent of the Population that is Non-white, 2015 These data were obtained from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey five year estimates tables. They show the percentage of persons for the county, state and nation who either classified themselves as multi-racial or as a race other than White. Percent of the Population that is Older than 64 years, 2015 These data were obtained from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey five year estimates tables and show the proportion of persons residing in the county who report themselves to be 65 years of age and older. Percent of the Population in Poverty, 2014 Estimate These data were obtained from the Model-based Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for School Districts, Counties, and States. /did/www/saipe Percent of the Total Population under 18 in Poverty, 2014 Estimate These data were obtained from the Model-based Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for School Districts, Counties, and States. /did/www/saipe Percent of the Population 25 and Older that have a High School Diploma, GED, or more, 2014 These data were obtained from the American Community Survey 2009-2013 5-year estimates. Percent of the Population 25 and Older that have a Bachelor s Degree or more, 2014 Estimate These data were obtained from the American Community Survey 2009-2013 5-year estimates. Percent of Workers who Travel 30 minutes or more one way, to work, 2014 Estimate These data were obtained from the American Community Survey 2009-2013 5-year Estimates. Unemployment Rate, 2015 Annual Average These data were obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://bls.gov/lau/#tables Current Median Household Income, 2014 Estimate These data were obtained from the Model-based Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) for School Districts, Counties, and States. /did/www/saipe

Location Quotients Location quotients are the comparisons of the percentage of workers in a particular economic sector in the county as compared to the percentage of workers in that economic sector for the nation. If the location quotient (measured on the vertical axis) is greater than 1.0, then the county could have a competitive economic advantage for that particular sector. The horizontal axis measures the percentage change in the size of the location quotient for a particular sector over the last five years (2011-2015). If the percentage change in the location quotient is greater than zero, then the competitive advantage of the county (in relation to the nation) has increased. Conversely, if the percentage change is less than zero, then the competitive advantage of the county has declined. The sectors shown on this chart are the five sectors that have the highest employment in the county. The size of the bubble for each particular sector demonstrates the relative level of employment. The depicted sectors are a subset of the twenty-two 2- digit North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes that are a standard classification system used in economic analysis (an exception to this classification is the extrusion of Production Agriculture and Forestry, Fishing, and Related Activities that were derived from NAICS Code 11). The entire list of 2-digit NAICS codes is provided below. The data used in these calculations were obtained from Economic Modeling Systems Incorporated (EMSI). 2-digit NAICS Code s Code Name 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 21 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 22 Utilities 23 Construction 31-33 Manufacturing 42 Wholesale Trade 44-45 Retail Trade 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 51 Information 52 Finance and Insurance 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 56 Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 61 Educational Services 62 Health Care and Social Assistance 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 72 Accommodation and Food Services 81 Other Services (except Public Administration) 92 Public Administration (Government) Source: /eos/www/naics/

Gross Product Gross product is a comprehensive measure of the economic activity in a specific geographic area. It is calculated as the sum of the value-added activity in an area. In this case, state gross product numbers for the state were apportioned to the counties by the level of employment in particular economic sectors in the county. The exceptions are for estimates of the gross product in the counties attributable to production agriculture. In this case, cash farm receipt numbers are used due to the volatility of employment levels in this particular sector. Data for these estimates were obtained from two sources. Gross state product data and employment data (where available) were obtained from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the cases where BEA employment data were suppressed for nondisclosure purposes, estimates from the Woods & Poole proprietary Comprehensive Economic Development Data System (CEDDS) were used. Farm cash receipts were obtained from BEA. All data in this table are aggregated to the 2-digit NAICS code (see above). Estimates for other sectors are available on request. http://bea.gov Employment Growth by Stage and Size of Business Estimates for the number of net openings (openings minus closings), net expansion (businesses expanding minus businesses shrinking) and net relocations (businesses relocating to the area minus businesses moving from the area) are provided by three business size classifications. These estimates are provided by YourEconomy. http://youreconomy.org Real Personal versus Proprietor Income Personal per capita income is compared with average proprietor income (total proprietor income divided by the number of proprietors) and average nonfarm proprietor income (total nonfarm proprietor income divided by the number of nonfarm proprietors). If the level of average nonfarm proprietor income is less than the level of average proprietor income, then the level of average farm proprietor income is greater than the level of average proprietor income (the converse is also true). Data for these calculations were obtained from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. http://bea.gov Top Ten Employment s Estimates at the 3-digit NAICS code level were obtained from the proprietary data source Economic Modeling Specialists, Inc. http://economicmodeling.com Top Ten Occupation s Estimates at the 3-digit SOC code level were obtained from the proprietary data source Economic Modeling Specialists, Inc. http://economicmodeling.com Publication P2978-33 (POD-03-16) By Alan Barefield, Extension Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Ellen Moore, Student Assistant, Department of Agricultural Economics. Copyright 2016 by State University. All rights reserved. This publication may be copied and distributed without alteration for nonprofit educational purposes provided that credit is given to the State University Extension Service. We are an equal opportunity employer, and all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability status, protected veteran status, or any other characteristic protected by law. Extension Service of State University, cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture. Published in furtherance of Acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914. GARY B. JACKSON, Director