NorSIKT Nordic System for Intelligent Classification of Traffic



Similar documents
Pavement Design. Guest Lecturer Dr. Sirous Alavi, P.E. SIERRA TRANSPORTATION Terminal Way, Suite 125 Reno, Nevada 89502

Document version: 1.1. Installation Guide Übercart (Klarna Payment Module 1.1)

Traffic Monitoring Systems. Technology and sensors

T-REDSPEED White paper

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

Decree on Utility Model Rights

Accuracy of Pneumatic Road Tube Counters

CMFE. Community TV and digitalisation in the Nordic countries. By Christer Hedërstrom

Product registration. Anti-intruder products applicable to burglary and theft insurance. August Nordic Insurance Associations

Ticketing system and groupers version control in Nordic Cooperation process. Maisa Lukander Nordic Casemix Center

Norwegian Foreign Visitor Survey 2010

URBAN. Security Solution. Urban Security Solution Military Security Solution SOC Security Solution

Climate Review Group Environmental Management

Electronic Toll Collection


Traffic Management for a Smarter City:Istanbul Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality

Integrated Data System Structure for Active Traffic Management - Planning and Operation

UTSCH Company Presentation World Leader in Security License Plates Technology

ParkiNG systems Payment systems Payment terminals

Finn Frogne A/S. The World Leader in Taxi Technology. Nye partnerskaber

Ensuring Security by Providing Technology Multipliers

T+2 IMPLEMENTATION Questions & Answers

CONTINUED COMMITMENT. A Division of MVP Group

ParkingManagementSystems. Videobased Parking Management System INDOOR and OUTDOOR Description

Nokia Siemens Networks appoints Fleet Logistics to manage Finnish fleet

BlipTrack. Case Studies. ANPR vs. Bluetooth. This case describes how data from ANPR cameras match corresponding Bluetooth sensor data.

Drink-driving and alcolocks in Sweden international challenges

Norwegian Foreign Visitor Survey 2011

INVESTIGATION OF ASIM 29X, CANOGA, RTMS, SAS-1, SMARTSENSOR, TIRTL & OTHER SENSORS FOR AUTOMATIC VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION

Traffic safety among motorcyclists

A wireless sensor network for traffic surveillance

Highway Traffic Monitoring

AudienceProject Device Study TV vs Streaming and Online Video

Adaptive controlled traffic lights - a progress report from Uppsala. Sampo Hinnemo

Trailer-mounted or van-integrated

Our Focus Benefits Yours.

APPLICATION GUIDE TO MASTER S DEGREE PROGRAMMES AT HANKEN 2015

Survey report on Nordic initiative for social responsibility using ISO 26000

Instrumentation for Monitoring around Marine Renewable Energy Devices

Definitions. A [non-living] physical agent that performs tasks by manipulating the physical world. Categories of robots

OPEN PARK. Automatic Number Plate Recognition that works worldwide including Egypt Number plates

Applying RFID in traffic junction monitoring

High Tech Electronics

Intelligent Surveillance & Security Systems

Leading video analytics platform market

Toll Collection Systems

Smart Transport ITS Norway

Common platform for automated trucks and construction equipment

CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2016

TRA Q NORDIC RELEASE - JULY 2013

Exhaust emissions from vehicles with Euro 6/VI technology

What roundabout design provides the highest possible safety?

CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2015

UBC Technical Guidelines Section Edition Secure Access: General Standards Page 1 of 7

Car tax refund on export

Technologies and Techniques for Collecting Floating Car Data. Mike Hayward Head of Vehicle Telematics WS Atkins Transport Systems

White Paper. Portsmouth Bluetooth and Wi-Fi journey time and congestion monitoring system

Card payment services

INTELLIGENT AND INNOVATIVE TRANSPORT SYSTEMS

Regulation of the Energy Market in Finland, Nordic Countries and EU. Veli-Pekka Saajo Head of Economic Regulation Energy Market Authority

Instructions for expatriate Finns

Is academic drift detected in the organizational development of Nordic higher education systems and nonuniversity

PHYS 222 Spring 2012 Final Exam. Closed books, notes, etc. No electronic device except a calculator.

Reduced BAC limit less drinking and driving?

Big Data in the Nordics 2012

Electric vehicles or use of hydrogen in the Norwegian transport sector in 2050?

Smart service solutions that add value to your operation

Active Roofs and Facades in Sustainable Renovation

How cloud-based systems and machine-driven big data can contribute to the development of autonomous vehicles

Case No COMP/M NORDIC CAPITAL / TIETOENATOR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/05/2008

FACT SHEET SWEDEN ABOUT TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES (TCS) SWEDEN AND THE NORDIC REGION

CASE STUDY. Test Laboratories. Volvo Cars Safety Centre Accelerometers Help Improve Car Safety. Sweden. Automotive. Transducers

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF NASDAQ OMX DERIVATIVES MARKETS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Transcription:

NorSIKT Nordic System for Intelligent Classification of Traffic A NordFoU project Torgeir Vaa Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Key figures : Project period 2010-2012- >2013 Budget 700 000 Euro Participating countries: Norway (leading country) Sweden Denmark Finland Island Project organisation: Steering group Koordinating group Working groups

Background Methods and equipment used for data collection is not very standardized Comparative statistics between countries are difficult Each country has its own technical platform and the market for data collection equipment in each country is limited

Objective The main objective of the NorSIKT project is to standardize the system for classification of motor vehicles in the Nordic countries in order to: Determine new joint Nordic method for converting data between different classification methods Create a larger Nordic market for measuring equipment and road traffic monitoring systems Reduce the cost of collecting road traffic data

Main activities

State-of-the-art The State-of-the-Art report shows that the current situation varies greatly between countries However, similarities have also been identified: all countries apply some form of vehicle classification all countries are using loop sensors in some context length-based classification parameters are dominant but axel configuration is also being used

Classification system The main principle in the classification system is to found the definition of vehicle categories on legal vehicle classification system in each country using the main categories of vehicle types

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk

How does a bus look like?

Challenges What type of car is this:

Test procedures Three large test sites have been constructed Norway Sweden Denmark The test plans includes both the standard equipment in the Nordic countries and alternative technologies Statistical methods are being used both to determine the sample size (number of vehicles) and to objectively compare different type of registration equipment s ability to classify vehicles

Technologies being tested Inductive loops (dual loop) Inductive loops in combination with pietzo electric cables Rubber tubes Magnetic sensors (magnetometer) Micro wave radars Laser beams (infrared) Radars

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk Finnish radar tests: http://www.nordfou.org/projekter.html#p5 ViaCount II Zierzega Icoms DataCollect

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk Norwegian test site (Klett)

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk Swedish test site (Amsberg)

Nordisk System for Intelligent Klassifisering av av Trafikk Danish test site (Farum)

Error types To quantify the accuracy of the measurements, each vehicle category has to be considered individually While defining the error as the probability that a random vehicle is assigned to an incorrect category, two types of errors can be identified: The vehicle is assigned to an incorrect category or not assigned at all (error type A) A different type of vehicle is incorrectly assigned to the category under consideration (error type B)

Test design and conducted tests Reference equipment ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) Video recorder Radar Laser (EMIT) Measuring equipment Varies on each test site Tested equipment classify vehicles in different ways a translation key has been defined for each equipment Conducted tests: Klett: 22.-23. November 2011 Amsberg: 11.-12. January 2012

Results- Meteor 3000

Results- Datarec Loop Monitor

Preliminary conclusions Total number of vehicles Number of missing vehicles is in general very low Classification capabilities Every tested equipment has errors of both types There is no obvious winner There will be done some changes in the classification table New tests planned this summer/autumn: Repeated tests at Klett, Amsberg and Farum Radar test in Norway

Thank you for your attention torgeir.vaa@vegvesen.no http://www.nordfou.org/index.html