FSR + STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Similar documents
UPDATED FUNCTIONAL SERVICING and STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

89 Avenue Road GP Ltd. Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for 89 Avenue Road Re-Development City of Toronto

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SERVICING REPORT IN SUPPORT OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION Cumberland Terrace

Functional Servicing and Storm Water Management Report. Project Location: 258 Sunview Street Waterloo, Ontario

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

FUNCTIONAL SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

629, 633 and 675 Eastern Avenue City of Toronto Toronto & East York District. Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report June

CONTENT COPY OF ORIGINAL

Engineering Specifications February, 2004 Schedule H to Bylaw 7452, Subdivision Bylaw Page 18

Stormwater Management Functional Servicing Report

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Site Grading, Erosion Control, Servicing & Stormwater Management Guidelines

CITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

Outlet stabilization structure

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

Preliminary Servicing & Stormwater Management Report

SERVICING REPORT SITE PLAN AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. THEREFORE the council of the Corporation of the City of Guelph enacts as follows:

Block and Gravel Inlet Protection (BIP)

JULY 24, 2009 WEST-END FLOODING INVESTIGATION ACTION PLAN. Presentation to Insurance Companies 19 January 2012

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD TTY Users Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd

Stormwater Management Design Brief. Proposed Commercial Redevelopment 5830 Hazeldean Road Ottawa (Stittsville), Ontario.

REGION OF PEEL PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES MANUAL

A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems.

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Pollution Control NEW! NEW! Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Urban Drainage Solutions for Domestic & Commercial Applications. klargester.

4.3 Cisterns and Rain Barrels

Downspout to storm sewer. Leaky laterals

Beseck Switching Station Inspection

CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE

SECTION 6A STORM DRAIN DESIGN Mar S E C T I O N 6A STORM DRAIN - DESIGN

The checklist utilized by the Authority will be similar to that which is shown below. Project Name: Location: Consulting Engineering Firm:

SE-10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. Objectives

1. Water Line Maintenance 2. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance 3. Spill/Leak/Overflow Control, Response, and Containment

CHAPTER 11 STORM DRAINAGE

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES MANUAL LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE

Design Templates Stormwater Calculation Summary

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

To prevent increased stormwater runoff entering Council s drainage system and causing overloading of the system that in turn might cause flooding.

PART 6 - STANDARD DESIGN AND CALCULATION FORMS 6.1 SANITARY SEWER DATA SHEET

Architectural Processing and Inspections for Home Mortgage Insurance

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SERVICING REPORT

Standard Site Drainage and Erosion Control Details (August 15, 2006)

SC-07 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Mosquito Control Guidelines

Storm Drain Inlet Protection - IP

Home Drainage & Causes of Basement Flooding. Water

City of Edmonton Page 1 of 5 Foundation Drain Discharge Collection System Guideline November, 2005

WEST-END FLOODING INVESTIGATION 24 JULY 2009 RAINSTORM EVENT CONSOLIDATED REPORT AND ACTION PLAN

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

City of Paso Robles Community Development Department Construction Site Storm Water Quality Requirements

Storm Drainage Systems

Guidelines for Control of Water Runoff on Small Lots. Revised 6/09

Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

STORM DRAIN PIPE MAINTENANCE. a. Develop standard operating procedures for maintaining storm drain pipes.

Using Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension with AutoCAD Civil 3D 2008: A Recommended Workflow

Storm Water Management Requirements for Construction Projects Less than One Acre

STANDARD INSPECTION FORM GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

New Road 11.0m Asphalt 23m ROW

Annual Standards and Specifications. Erosion and Sediment Control

SECTION 5. Sediment Control Measures

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

CHAPTER 5. Storm Sewer

Homeowner s Guide to Drainage

Storm Drain Inlet Protection for Construction Sites (1060)

CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS

ON-SITE STORMWATER DETENTION TANK SYSTEMS TECHNICAL GUIDE

ADS Water Quality Units

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

Basic Elements of Reading Plans

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (SSBMP) PLAN/STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REVIEW CHECKLIST

Town of Beaumont. Lot Grading Guidelines

DECISION/DIRECTION NOTE

Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form

Low Impact Development Checklist

Property Care White Papers. Site Drainage: Monitor and Maintain

FUNCTIONAL SERVICING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Permeable Pavement Construction Guide

Micromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience

Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. Mark J. Quimby Project Consultant

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Module 6 : Quantity Estimation of Storm Water. Lecture 6 : Quantity Estimation of Storm Water

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Transcription:

Proposed Site Development 2477 Queensway Drive, Burlington ON FSR + STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Prepared for: Riepma Consultants Inc. 13041 Highway #7 Georgetown ON L7G 4S4 Prepared by: MGM Consulting Inc. 400 Bronte Street South Suite 201 Milton, Ontario L9T 0H7 June 10, 2016 File No. 2016-023

Proposed site Development 2477Queensway Drive, Burlington Ontario 01 June 2016 Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report Page 1 of 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION MGM Consulting Inc. has been retained by Reipma Consultants Inc. to prepare a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report in support of a Rezoning Application for the proposed site development located at 2477 Queensway Drive in the City of Burlington, Ontario. The proposal includes for a new building, new paved driveway and access to Queensway Drive, new concrete walkways and related site works. The objective of the report is to provide details on the required site grading, municipal servicing (storm, sanitary and water) and stormwater management features for the development, as required to adequately service the area to be developed, to provide a basis for the detailed grading, site servicing, and stormwater management design which will follow upon review of this documentation by the City of Burlington Technical Services staff. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & ABOVEGROUND FEATURES The existing site includes a 2 story building and a small garage building located on a 0.304 ha site fronting on Queensway Drive. The site abuts existing highways and roadways with the QEW to the north, Queensway Drive to the south and west and Guelph Line to the east. Elevations within the site range from 104.0 m along the north west of the site to 103.5 m along the south east fronting Queensway Drive. The site general slopes from north west to south east with drainage conveyed towards Queensway Drive. The majority of the site is currently grassed with the remainder or occupied by the existing buildings and asphalt driveway and gravel parking areas. 2.2 EXISTING MUNICIPAL SERVICING Information on the existing municipal servicing in the vicinity of the proposed site development was provided by City of Burlington technical staff. Based on the available information sources, the existing municipal services relevant to the current proposal include; A 300mm diameter sanitary sewer on Queensway Drive which flows from north east to south west with elevations ranging from of 99.3 to 99.1 A 450mm diameter storm sewer running along Queensway Drive, fronting the proposed development draining from north west to south east with invert elevations in the order of 101.76 m to 101.65m A 150 mm diameter watermain running along Queensway Drive, fronting the proposed development. Existing servicing as identified above is indicated on the Site Servicing & Grading Plan, Drawing CV-1. 3.0 PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 SITE SERVICING 3.1.1 Sanitary Servicing A new 200mm sanitary service consistent with current Region standards is proposed, connecting to the

Proposed site Development 2477Queensway Drive, Burlington Ontario 01 June 2016 Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report Page 2 of 4 existing Municipal 300mm sanitary sewer on Queensway Drive. The proposed sanitary servicing is indicated on the Site Servicing & Grading Plan, Drawing CV-1. 3.1.2 Domestic Water Supply A domestic water supply typically required for a building of this size would be in the order of 50 mm in diameter. This assumption would need to be confirmed by a mechanical engineer during the detailed design stage based on occupancy loading and fixture requirements. 3.1.3 Fire Protection A private hydrant will be required within the site to provide charging of the siamese connection in the event of a fire. All internal watermain connections are to be carried out in accordance with Region of Halton requirements. Pressure and flow tests should be carried out on the existing hydrant locations to confirm adequate flow and pressure as required for fire protection purposes Domestic water and fire protection servicing will connect to the existing 300mm watermain on Queensway Drive. The proposed water servicing is indicated on the Site Servicing & Grading Plan, Drawing CV-1. 3.1.4 Storm Servicing The proposed minor storm system for the site will consist of a series of underground storm sewers which will convey flows from the site to the existing 450mm municipal storm sewer Queensway Drive. The proposed internal storm servicing is indicated on the Site Servicing & Grading Plan, Drawing CV-1. 4.0 SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION In order to control any release of sediments and erosion during construction, the following measures should be incorporated into the site development procedures: 1. Silt control fencing should be installed around the perimeter of any areas to be disturbed as required to contain sediments that are carried in stormwater runoff. 2. All existing catchbasins in the vicinity of the site, and all new catchbasins, should have sediment controls installed over the grates until the site is stabilized. Filter fabric should be regularly inspected and replaced as required. 3. Any required dewatering of the site as required for the building construction should incorporate sediment and debris screens at the inlet of the pumping system and sediment settling facilities at discharge points, to prevent sediment discharges to the municipal drainage system. 4. A mud mat should be constructed at the construction entrance location which will assist in the removal of mud from the wheels of construction equipment leaving the site. This feature will need to be maintained throughout the construction period. 5. Any mud tracked onto adjacent municipal or private roads should be cleaned from the roads on a daily basis.

Proposed site Development 2477Queensway Drive, Burlington Ontario 01 June 2016 Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report Page 3 of 4 5.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5.1 Proposed Minor Storm System The proposed minor system has been designed to convey the 5 year flow, without surcharging, which is consistent with current City of Burlington standards. The internal storm system will consist of a series of underground storm sewers, manholes and catch basins as indicated on the attached Site Servicing & Grading Plan, CV-1. A new 300 mm diameter storm service connection is proposed in the north west corner of the site, outletting to the existing 450 mm diameter storm sewer on Queensway Drive. 5.2 Proposed Stormwater Rate Controls and Site Storage Stormwater rate controls are proposed as required to control the post development 100 year peak flows to below the existing 5 year peak flow rate. The required controlled flows from the site are achieved with the installation of a 95mm diameter orifice plate, installed on the outlet of MH2. Detailed stormwater management calculations are included in Appendix A. 5.3 Emergency Overflow During severe storm events, or when an outlet is blocked, emergency overland flow will occur from the site at an elevation of 103.75 m. through the proposed entrance to the Queensway Drive right of way. The overflow elevation provided is approximately 250 mm below the proposed finished floor elevation of the proposed building and approximately 1000 mm below the finished floor of the existing building. 5.4 Proposed Stormwater Quality Controls Quality controls are to be provided as required to achieve enhanced (Level 1) protection, which is equivalent to providing for 80% removal of the total suspended solids on an annual loading basis. The required quality controls are proposed and will be provided with the installation of a Stormceptor Model STC 300 oil/grit separator. Modelling for the proposed treatment unit is included in Appendix B. As indicated, the proposed unit will provide for an estimated removal of 85% of the total suspended solids on an annual loading basis. 6.0 SUMMARY The following summarizes the proposed stormwater management features for the subject site; Grading within the site is to be completed such that emergency storm flows are conveyed from the site to the adjacent municipal right of way without flooding existing or proposed buildings, Sanitary servicing for the site can be provided by a gravity sanitary sewer system and a connection to the existing 300 mm sanitary sewer on Queensway Drive, Water servicing as required for domestic supply and fire protection can be provided with a connection to the existing 300 mm watermain on Queensway Drive, Storm servicing would include a series of on-site manholes and catchbasins and an underground storm system, outletting to the existing 450 mm diameter storm sewer on Queensway Drive,

Proposed site Development 2477Queensway Drive, Burlington Ontario 01 June 2016 Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report Page 4 of 4 A proposed package treatment unit is proposed at the outlet from the internal storm system, as required to provide Level 1 quality treatment, Sufficient on-site storage has been provided, as required, within the storm sewer system, and aboveground in paved areas to a maximum ponding depth of 300 mm. Surface ponding will only occur during storm events that exceed the 5 year storm. Sediment and erosion controls are proposed during construction as required to control the transportation of sediments off site, and to control erosion during construction. Prepared by: MGM Consulting Inc Blair Nock, CET M.L. Stairs, P.Eng.

LEGEND EXTERNAL DRAINAGE DRAINAGE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE AREA (ha) COEFFICIENT PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT 2477 QUEENSWAY DRIVE, BURLINGTON ONTARIO EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS CONSULTING INC Consulting Engineering & Project Management 400 Bronte Street South Tel: (905)567-8678 Suite 201 Fax: (905)875-1339 Milton, Ontario Email: mgm@mgm.on.ca L9T 0H7 www.mgm.on.ca FIGURE 1 MAY 26, 2016 NTS 2016-23-FIG1-2

NEW 2 STOREY BUILDING LEGEND EXTERNAL DRAINAGE DRAINAGE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE AREA (ha) COEFFICIENT PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT 2477 QUEENSWAY DRIVE, BURLINGTON ONTARIO PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS CONSULTING INC Consulting Engineering & Project Management 400 Bronte Street South Tel: (905)567-8678 Suite 201 Fax: (905)875-1339 Milton, Ontario Email: mgm@mgm.on.ca L9T 0H7 www.mgm.on.ca FIGURE 2 MAY 26, 2016 NTS 2016-23-FIG1-2

APPENDIX A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS

Appendix A Detailted Stormwater Management Calculations 1.0 DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS 1.1 Existing Drainage Areas: (see Figure No. 1) Attenuated Areas "c" Area (ha) Asphalt 0.90 0.022 Roof 0.95 0.020 Gravel 0.60 0.027 Grass/Landscaping 0.25 0.223 Concrete 0.95 0.012 Weighted Avg. "C" 0.40 Total Site Area 0.304 External Area 0.25 0.048 1.2 Proposed Drainage Areas (see Figure No. 2) Attenuated Areas: "c" Area (ha) Asphalt 0.90 0.130 Roof 0.95 0.048 Grass/Landscaping 0.25 0.088 Concrete 0.95 0.038 Weighted Avg. "C" 0.73 Total Site Area 0.304 External Area 0.25 0.048 2.0 Allowable Post Development Flows 2.1 Allowable Post Development Flow Rate Peak 100 year storm flows for the redevelopment are to be controlled to the exsiting 5 year peak rate. Based on Tc = 10 minutes Intensity 'I' = A (t+b) c For 5 year storm, For 100 year storm, A = 697.4 A = 1114.2 b= 5 b= 5 c = 0.764 c = 0.761 Therefore I = 88.1 mm/hr Therefore I = 141.9 mm/hr Flow "Q" - CIA/360, where c = 0.40 Therefore Q allow = 0.0299 m 3 /sec Page 1 of 3

Appendix A Detailted Stormwater Management Calculations 3.0 Orifice Control Calculations: A 95mm orifice plate is proposed at the outlet of Manhole No. 2 that will control peak flows during the 2 to 100 year storm events to the two year predevelopment flow rate. 3.1-5 Year Post Development Flow: Invert at controlled outlet = 101.95 m Ponding Elev. during 1:5 yr. storm = 103.60 m Centreline Orifice Elevation = 102.00 m Maximum Head on Orifice (H) 1.60 m H = 1.60 m A = 0.0071 m^2 g = 9.81 Q = 0.02464 m 3 /sec D = 95 mm. C= 0.62 Based on the above, a 95 mm orifice plate will provide a controlled flow during the 100 year storm event = Total site flow (attenuated + unattenuated) during a 5 year storm event = 24.6 l/sec. 27.3 l/sec 3.2-100 Year Post Development Flow: Invert at controlled outlet = 101.95 m Ponding Elev. during 1:100 yr. storm = 103.75 m Centreline Orifice Elevation = 102.00 m Maximum Head on Orifice (H) 1.75 m H = 1.75 m A = 0.0071 m^2 g = 9.81 Q = 0.02577 m 3 /sec D = 95 mm. C= 0.62 Based on the above, a 95 mm orifice plate will provide a controlled flow during the 100 year storm event = Total site flow (attenuated + unattenuated) during a 100 year storm event = 25.8 l/sec. 29.3 l/sec 4.0 On-Site Storage Required 4.1-5 Year Storage Calculation 5 Year Attenuated Attenuated Unattenuated Controlled Aprox. Rainfall Rainfall Flow from Flow Flow Flow From Detention Duration Intensity (I) External Areas From Site From Site Site* Volumes min. s mm/h m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 10 600 88.1 0.0029 0.0428 0.0027 0.0246 12.7 15 900 70.7 0.0024 0.0344 0.0022 0.0246 10.9 20 1200 59.6 0.0020 0.0290 0.0018 0.0246 7.6 25 1500 51.9 0.0017 0.0252 0.0016 0.0246 3.5 30 1800 46.1 0.0015 0.0224 0.0014 0.0246-1.2 Based on the above, the required 5 year site storage = 12.7 m 3 Page 2 of 3

Appendix A Detailted Stormwater Management Calculations 4.2-100 Year Storage Calculation 100 Year Attenuated Attenuated Unattenuated Controlled Aprox. Rainfall Rainfall Flow from Flow Flow Flow From Detention Duration Intensity (I) External Areas From Site From Site Site* Volumes min. s mm/h m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 /sec m 3 10 600 141.9 0.0047 0.0690 0.0043 0.0258 28.8 15 900 114.0 0.0038 0.0554 0.0035 0.0258 30.1 20 1200 96.2 0.0032 0.0468 0.0029 0.0258 29.1 25 1500 83.7 0.0028 0.0407 0.0026 0.0258 26.6 30 1800 74.5 0.0025 0.0362 0.0023 0.0258 23.3 Based on the above, the required 100 year site storage = 30.1 m 3 5.0 On-site Storage Provided 5.1 Storm Sewer Storage The detention volume available within the storm sewer pipes is as follows: From To Size Length Volume (m 3 ) MH2 STC 300 450 5.0 0.8 STC 300 CBMH3 450 13.5 2.1 CBMH3 CBMH4 450 23.5 3.7 CBMH4 CBMH5 450 16.5 2.6 CB1 CBMH3 250 27.2 1.3 CBMH5 MH6 450 22.5 3.6 MH6 AD1 150 26.5 0.5 Total Underground Storage = 14.7 5.2 Surface Storage The detention volume available within the ponding areas at an assumed elev of 103.75 m. is as follows: Structure Grate Elev. Ponding Area Depth Volume (m 3 ) CBMH2 103.45 103.75 245 0.30 24.5 CBMH4 & 5 103.45 103.75 870 0.30 87.0 Max Aboveground Storage (100 year)= Max Storage Underground & Surface = 111.5 126.2 Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX B TREATMENT UNIT MODELLING

Brief Stormceptor Sizing Report - 2477 Queensway Drive Project Information & Location Project Name 2477 Queensway Project Number 2016-023 City Burlington State/ Province Ontario Country Canada Date 6/1/2016 Designer Information EOR Information (optional) Name Blair Nock Name Company MGM Consulting Inc. Company Phone # 905-567-8678 Phone # Email bnock@mgm.on.ca Email Stormwater Treatment Recommendation The recommended Stormceptor Model(s) which achieve or exceed the user defined water quality objective for each site within the project are listed in the below Sizing Summary table. Site Name 2477 Queensway Drive Target TSS Removal (%) 80 TSS Removal (%) Provided 85 Recommended Stormceptor Model STC 300 The recommended Stormceptor Model achieves the water quality objectives based on the selected inputs, historical rainfall records and selected particle size distribution. Stormceptor Sizing Summary Stormceptor Model % TSS Removal Provided STC 300 85 STC 750 91 STC 1000 92 STC 1500 92 STC 2000 94 STC 3000 94 STC 4000 96 STC 5000 96 STC 6000 97 STC 9000 98 STC 10000 98 STC 14000 98 Stormceptor MAX Custom Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report Page 1 of 3

Drainage Area Total Area (ha) 0.30 Imperviousness % 73.0 Station Name State/Province Rainfall TORONTO CENTRAL Ontario Station ID # 0100 Years of Records 18 Latitude Longitude Particle Diameter (microns) 45 30'N 90 30'W Sizing Details Notes Water Quality Objective TSS Removal (%) 80.0 Runoff Volume Capture (%) Oil Spill Capture Volume (L) Peak Conveyed Flow Rate (L/s) Water Quality Flow Rate (L/s) Storage (ha-m) Particle Size Distribution (PSD) The selected PSD defines TSS removal CLOCA Distribution % Up Stream Storage Discharge (cms) 0.000 0.000 Specific Gravity 1.0 4.5 2.65 1.5 1.3 2.65 3.0 1.3 2.65 6.5 1.3 2.65 9.0 0.0 2.65 12.0 1.9 2.65 22.0 1.3 2.65 36.0 2.6 2.65 50.0 3.9 2.65 75.0 3.9 2.65 100.0 3.9 2.65 125.0 5.2 2.65 150.0 11.7 2.65 212.0 6.5 2.65 250.0 6.5 2.65 300.0 17.5 2.65 425.0 23.4 2.65 850.0 3.3 2.65 Up Stream Flow Diversion Max. Flow to Stormceptor (cms) Stormceptor performance estimates are based on simulations using PCSWMM for Stormceptor, which uses the EPA Rainfall and Runoff modules. Design estimates listed are only representative of specific project requirements based on total suspended solids (TSS) removal defined by the selected PSD, and based on stable site conditions only, after construction is completed. For submerged applications or sites specific to spill control, please contact your local Stormceptor representative for further design assistance. Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report Page 2 of 3

For Stormceptor Specifications and Drawings Please Visit: http://www.imbriumsystems.com/technical-specifications Stormceptor Brief Sizing Report Page 3 of 3

PLAN SECTION No. DATE KEYMAP - NTS DRAWING ISSUE DESCRIPTION 1 JUNE 10/16 FIRST SUBMISSION TO CITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE "MUD MAT" NOTES: TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL CATCHBASINS AND MAINTAINED BETWEEN APRIL AND DECEMBER. REMOVE FOR WINTER SEASON. WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO HAVE EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE BETWEEN 0.15mm AND 0.25mm. WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO BE REPLACED PERIODICALLY WHEN ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS INTERFERES WITH DRAINAGE. CATCHBASIN SEDIMENT PROTECTION LEGEND EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATION PROPOSED SLOPE PROPOSED OIL GRIT SEPARATOR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED CB MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATER VALVE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT PROTECTION PROPOSED MAJOR OVERLAND FLOW BENCHMARK: ELEVATIONS ARE GEODETIC, DERIVED BY DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS, AND ARE REFERRED TO THE CAN-NET REFERENCE STATION, HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 200.044m. UTM-17 NORTH CANADA NAD 83 CSRS ALL DISTANCES & ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048. CONSULTANTS: CLIENT: CONSULTING INC Consulting Engineering & Project Management 400 Bronte Street South Tel: (905 )567-8678 Suite 201 Fax: (905 )875-1339 Milton, Ontario Email: mgm@mgm.on.ca L9T 0H7 www.mgm.on.ca PROJECT: SITE DEVELOPMENT 2477 QUEENSWAY DRIVE, BURLINGTON ONTARIO DRAWING: PRELIMINARY GRADING & SERVICING PLAN DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: JOB CAPTAIN: BN SCALE: 1:200 CURRENT ISSUE: 1 AP PROJECT NO.: 2016-023 CURRENT REV: 0 MS DATE: MAY 2016 SHEET NO.: CV-1