QRA in the Netherlands

Similar documents
Major Hazard Risk Assessment on Ammonia Storage at Jordan Phosphate Mines Company (JPMC) in Aqaba, Jordan

Consequence Analysis: Comparison of Methodologies under API Standard and Commercial Software

Appendix 1: Tools for Probabilistic risk assessment

CHAPTER 4: OFFSITE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

Population Vulnerability Assessment around a LPG Storage and Distribution Facility near Cochin using ALOHA And GIS

INF.3 E TANKS. Reduction of the risk of a BLEVE. TNO Report ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE

LNG SAFETY MYTHS and LEGENDS

Using the Linear Risk Integral (LRI) approach in pipeline QRA for a better application of risk mitigation measures

Regulations for bunkering LNG

Do you speak SAFETY?

Based on the initial size-up and any information available, Command will formulate an action plan to deal with the situation.

A Review of HSE s Risk Analysis and Protection Based Analysis Approaches for Land-Use Planning. Final Report

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ACCIDENTS AT WORK IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND THE SEVESO II DIRECTIVE

LPG, Flammable Liquids, Toxic and Corrosive Substances

AWR 147: Rail Car Incident Response Course Overview

A Triple Bottom Line approach to QRA

Using CFD in Platform Design

Directions to Students

ALOHA. Example Scenarios. August 2013

Report Port toolkit risk profile LNG bunkering

Methods of Technical Risk Assessment in a Regional Context

Ir. NOORAZMAN BIN SOUD. Deputy Director Petroleum Safety Division

A PROGRESSIVE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR A TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPANY: HOW TO AVOID THE RUSH TO QRA

Major Hazard Plant ( Seveso Installations)

Risk Assessment Data Directory. Report No March Land transport accident statistics

Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road

Hazard and Risk Assessment

OVERVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk Assessment Data Directory. Report No March Ignition probabilities

Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous & Explosive Chemicals. Application, Exclusions & Definitions

Published in "Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia" No. 67/2004 LAW ON AMBIENT AIR QUALITY I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

UPGRADING OF THE AUSTRIAN TUNNEL RISK MODEL TURISMO METHODICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS

Open Cycle Refrigeration System

Performance Standard for Secondary Containment

A placard provides the viewer with a variety of information through several different methods. First is the color of the placard.

The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2007 (CDG&UTPER) The Carriage Of LPG Cylinders by Road

The case for rail transportation of hazardous materials

Safety Assessment for a major hazard facility

How To Handle A Train Accident In Whitefish

EPA RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RULE TO IMPACT DISTRIBUTORS AND MANUFACTURERS

Biomethane in Vehicles. October 2008

CHAPTER 7 RISK ASSESSMENT AND ONSITE EMERGENCY PLAN

APPENDIX H7: POOL SPREAD AREAS FOR INSTANTANEOUS TANK FAILURE

Hazardous materials can be silent killers. Almost every household and workplace has varying amounts of chemicals that, if spilled or combined, will

WINDEX ORIGINAL GLASS CLEANER WITH AMMONIA-D

York County Department of Emergency Services Communications Division

The Basics of Natural Gas

Company Header POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT PLAN. For [site name] [EPL number]

Annex H. Quantitative Risk Assessment Specialist Report

: Sharpie King Size Permanent Markers Lacey Road, 10th Floor Downers Grove, IL USA or

Basic Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Risks in the Transport of Dangerous Goods

Overview of pipelines in Europe advantages and disadvantages

SAFETY DATA SHEET. 955 Connecticut Ave, Suite 5202 Bridgeport, CT Tel: Date Prepared: July 22, 2015

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Code: 10033

Natural Gas Information Contents

Incident Reporting Requirements

COMAH Guidance for the Surface Engineering Sector

GUIDELINES FOR THE LOCATION OF STATIONARY BULK AMMONIA STORAGE FACILITIES

Carbon Capture & Storage Reliable cost effective CO 2 shipping through statistical modelling

SAFETY DATA SHEET TIDYFOAM E2 HAND CLEANER SANITIZER

RISK ASSESSMENT AND USE OF RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE REGULATION OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES

Syllabus. for. Dangerous Goods Safety Adviser. Examinations

JOINT CBA AND SIA GUIDANCE FOR THE STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS IN SEALED PACKAGES IN SPECIFIED EXTERNAL STORAGE AREAS

SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION

: GLADE Aerosol - Lavender

DEEP PANUKE TECHNICAL NOTE

EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES - CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS AREAS (ZONING) AND SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT

US Safety Data Sheet GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30 GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30

INSTITUTION OF GAS ENGINEERS AND MANAGERS. Founded 1863 IGEM/TD/2 Edition 2 Royal Charter 1929 Communication XXXX Her Majesty the Queen

Hazardous materials can be silent killers. Almost every household and workplace has varying amounts of chemicals that, if spilled or combined, will

CFPA-E No 20:2009. Fire Safety in Camping Sites CFPA-E -GUIDELINES

Propane Fuel. Material Safety Data Sheet

2002 E D I T I O N INSTRUCTOR

The risk of derailment and collision, and safety systems to prevent the risk

: MR MUSCLE Window & Glass Cleaner

Site and Storage Conditions for Class 3.1 Flammable Liquids

TOXIC AND FLAMMABLE GAS CLOUD DETECTORS LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION USING CFD

SAFETY DATA SHEET:HELIOS

Finnish Meteorological Institute s Services for Insurance Sector

Certain specific properties of compressed gases make them highly useful in various research activities.

Material Safety Data Sheet

A E O L I S F O R E C A S T I N G S E R V I C E S WIND FARM ENERGY ASSESSMENT - FEASIBILITY STUDY. Kees van Vliet

Guidelines for systems and installations for supply of LNG as fuel to ships

APPLICATION OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES TO BUILDING SITING STUDIES

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

FUELING AND FUEL STORAGE

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

WATERWAYS in Finland

Fire Risk in Metro Tunnels and Stations

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MODELING: FIRE RISKS OF CNG-POWERED BUSES

1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT - QRA FOR

SECTION 1 - Introduction

Transcription:

QRA in the Netherlands RID working group Standardized Risk Analysis 19 June 2008 Tineke Wiersma Department of Safety, Transport, Public Works and Water Management

Contents Risk criteria General approach Questions: Ask them during the presentation Available models and software Substance categories Scenarios, event trees, failure frequencies, consequences Overview of the software 2

Risk criteria: individual risk Individual risk (location specific risk) Probability per year that a person who stays permanently and unprotected on a place along the route dies due to an transport accident with dangerous substances Connect points with the same probability: risk contour 10-6 location specific risk contour Limit value for vulnerable objects for new situations Guide value for limited/not vulnerable objects 3

Risk criteria: societal risk Probability per year per km-transport route that a group of 10 persons or more dies due to a transport accident with dangerous substances on the transport route 4

Societal risk: guide value When risk has increased or has exceeded the guide value the competent authorities have to give a motivation on the acceptability of the risk Investigate if risk reducing measures can be taken (ALARA) Elaborate possibilities for self-rescue and emergency response 5

Standardized approach Guidelines for QRA described in Purple Book (1999): Publication series on dangerous substances (PGS 3), Guideline for quantitative risk analysis Establishments and transport Updated version in progress, Calculation protocol Railway (2005) Protocol Sea- and inland waterways (2005) Free software made available by ministry of Transport: First version IPORBM 1997 New, extended version RBMII (2005), recently updated 6

General and standardized approach (PGS3, Purple Book) Start Number transports > threshold values? No Ready Threshold value was determined with old model (IPORBM); will be updated applying RBMII Yes Global analysis with IPORBM IPORBM is replaced by RBM II Are risk criteria met? No Detailed QRA RBM II provides more details yes Ready 7

Threshold values rail transport Individual risk contour 10-6 contour can occur with quantities larger than: Number of flammable liquids (C3, tank cars/year) Total number of dangerous subst. (tank cars/year) High speed 3000 7000 Low speed No 10-6 contour No 10-6 contour Exceeding of guide value societal risk: - Dominated by transport of LPG - Depends on intensity of population along route - Example: - Population density of 100 persons per hectare on one side of the route, and 1600 tank cars at high speed leads to exceeding of guide value 8

Standardized software: RBM II Used for calculation op IR and SR: to check if there is a conflict between transport activities and urban development Module road traffic Module railway traffic Module inland waterways Only a limited set of input data is necessary Most transport QRA in the Netherlands are performed with RBMII (> 80%?) 624 registered users 9

Applicability of RBMII Suitable for standard situations, on-going traffic, open air situations, flat land Representative for most special situations such as lower or higher situated tracks, tracks with windscreens, crossings. Not to be used for private sidings and shunting yards Not suitable for waterways with more than 10% sea ships More detailed analysis necessary for tunnels and complex railway situations 10

The standard risk analysis Calculation of individual risk and societal risk Determine probabilities and consequences of accidents with dangerous substances Flammable liquids Toxic liquids Flammable (liquefied) gasses Toxic (liquefied) gasses 11

Substances categories Category Flam. Liquid Tox. liquid Flam. gas Tox. gas Rail C3 D3 D4 A B2 B3 Road/waterwayRepr. subs. RBMII LF1 Heptane LF2 Pentane LT1 Acrylonitril LT2 LT3 Acroleine GF1 Etheenoxide GF2 n-butane GF3 Propane GT2 Methylmercaptane GT3 Ammonia GT4 Chlorine GT5 Chlorine 12

Scenarios: liquids Initial freq. Speed Release Substance Ignition Consequence D3/D4 Toxic effect instantaneous immediate Pool fire 600 m2 delayed Flash Fire < 40 km/h D3/D4 Toxic effect continuous 300 m3 immediate Pool fire F0 delayed Flash Fire > 40 km/h same branches as above 13

Scenarios: flammable gasses Initial freq. Speed Release Ignition Consequence < 40 km/h instantaneous entire tank contents Immediate Delayed Cold BLEVE Flash fire Explosion > 40 km/h continuous 0.075 m hole same branches as above Immediate Delayed Jet fire Flash fire Explosion Domino-effect of poolfire Hot BLEVE 14

F0 Toxic gas Initial freq. Speed < 40 km/h Release instantaneous entire tank contents continuous 0.075 m hole Consequence toxic gas cloud toxic gas cloud toxic gas cloud toxic gas cloud > 40 km/h same branches as above 15

Failure frequencies (rail) Initial failure frequency High speed track: 2.77. 10-8 per wagon per kilometre Low speed track: 1.36. 10-8 per wagon per kilometre 0.8. 10-8 per wagon per kilometre for each level crossing 3.3. 10-8 per wagon per kilometre for a kilometre track with set of points Failure frequencies based on Dutch accident data period 1981-1992 Update with new data will be performed this year 16

Failure frequencies (2) (rail) Based on accident data (13 damaged railway tankers) Probability of outflow: Category Flam. Liquid Toxic. Liquid Flam. Gas Toxic. gas Speed < 40 km/h 0.079 0.0079 0.00079 0.00079 Speed > 40 km/h 0.56 0.056 0.0028 0.0028 Ratio instantaneous and continuous release: 0.4 : 0.6 Probability ignition flammable liquid: 0.25 Ignition flammable gas, inst. release: immediate: 0.8 Ignition flammable gas, cont. release: immediate: 0.5 Flam. Gas, flash fire vs. explosion: 0.6 vs. 0.4 17

Basic assumptions consequence modelling Flammable and toxic liquids: pool size is fixed Inventory pressurized tanks Flammable gasses: 48 tonnes Toxic gasses; 50 tonnes Prescribed models for dispersion, exposure damage same as used for installations, prescribed in Purple Book (PGS3), Yellow Book (PGs2), Green Book (PGS1) Use of meteorological data: 6 weather classes, 12 wind directions, data available from 18 weather stations 18

Consequences, some results Flammable liquids: Pool fire: consequence. distances 10-30 metres Flammable gasses: Continuous release, immediate ignition: jet fire: ca. 80x 30 m Instantaneous release, immediate ignition : BLEVE: 100% let in radius van ca. 150 meter Instantaneous or continuous release, delayed ignition: Flash fire or explosion size gas cloud ca.145 bij 45 m. Toxic liquids: Pool evaporation, exposure to toxic gasses: 1% lethality at several hundreds metres depending on substance, weather conditions Toxic gasses (ammonia, chlorine): exposure to toxic gasses: 1% lethality at several kilometres depending on substance, weather conditions 19

Calculation of risks Risks are calculated by placing accident points along the route: Individual risk every 10 metre (railway, road) Societal risk every 25 metre (railway, road) Check for each location and each scenario which areas are affected and cumulate results: Lethality rate per location: individual risk contours Number of casualties per scenario: FN-curves, for transport calculates per km transport route 20

An overview of the standardized software RBMII Input of data: Type of transport Project data Weather data Data on the route Transported substances: Category, amount Length, type, etc. Build environment Calculation Analyse results FN-curve Individual risk Reports 21