GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

Similar documents
The importance of energy balances to estimate greenhouse gas emissions

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the ADP. New Zealand s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. 7 July 2015

Submission by Norway to the ADP

THE INDC OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS 28 MEMBER STATES

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION

Implications of Abundant Natural Gas

Critical Policy Options to Protect Industry Competitiveness

Germany Energy efficiency report

Annex 5A Trends in international carbon dioxide emissions

Greenhouse gas abatement potential in Israel

Russia: energy market developments. Marc-Antoine Eyl-Mazzega Russia Programme Manager Paris, 16 December 2014

E VIRO ME T Council meeting Luxembourg, 14 October 2013

To approve Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of the Republic of Armenia under the UNFCCC according to the following Annex.

- 1 - UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Note by the International Maritime Organization

Energy Prices, Climate Change Policy and U.S. Economic Growth

The Emissions Gap Report 2015

Impacts of good practice policies on regional and global greenhouse gas emissions

Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050

World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights. International Energy Agency

Energy [R]evolution vs. IEA World Energy Outlook scenario

Sweden Energy efficiency report

Climate Finance in Chile

Please address your inquiries to

EU renewable energy and biofuel targets what will they mean?

Six greenhouse gases covered by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol are:

Good afternoon, and thanks to the Energy Dialogue for your kind invitation to speak today.

Our financing of the energy sector in 2013

Technical Paper 1. Report on Birmingham s carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions reduction target baseline

Outline. 1. Climate and energy: where do we stand? 2. Why a new framework for 2030? 3. How it works. 4. Main challenges. 5.

Summary of the Impact assessment for a 2030 climate and energy policy framework

The External and Social Costs of Energy Technologies

Intended Nationally Determined Contribution

Germany's energy transition: Status quo and Challenges.

WP1 Task 1 The Drivers of Electricity Demand and Supply

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. REVIEW OF INFORMATION AND POSSIBLE DECISIONS UNDER ARTICLE 4.2(f) Submission by Turkey

London, 10 November 2015

Fact Sheet on China s energy sector and Danish solutions

Norwegian position on the proposed EU framework for climate and energy policies towards 2030

Comprehensive emissions per capita for industrialised countries

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

The Vision Scenario for the European Union 2011 Update for the EU-27

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

Annual Electricity and Heat Questionnaire

Climate Review Group Environmental Management

Greenhouse gas emissions in Winchester District: Part IV Estimates and trends ( )

OUTLOOK FOR NATURAL GAS IN EUROPE

Energy supply and consumption

The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. Major Economies Forum, Paris

Energy Climate and Change

RE-POWERING MARKETS Market design and regulation during the transition to low-carbon power systems

EU policy outlook on biofuels

The incompatibility of highefficient. 2 C scenarios

Building a Low-Carbon Economy The UK's Contribution to Tackling Climate Change.

INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION

Egypt & Climate Change

Exploring the Potential for International Mitigation Clubs for the Road from Paris - An initial exploration -

A REScoop manifesto. REScoop policy priorities for the European Parliament elections 2014

Keisuke Sadamori Director, Energy Markets and Security International Energy Agency Kuala Lumpur, 8 October

I CLIMATE AD EERGY POLICY FRAMEWORK

Population, Health, and Human Well-Being-- Nigeria

Energy Megatrends 2020

Status of China s regional trading programs: progress and challenge

Response to the Energy White Paper Issues Paper PREPARED BY EMC ENGINEERING FOR THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY

Costs and Benefits to EU Member States of 2030 Climate and Energy Targets

PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2013/2014

Population, Health, and Human Well-Being-- Kuwait

Where does the wine sector sit in terms of Australian climate policy and the global carbon market

Analysis beyond IPCC AR5: Net Phase Out of Global and Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Reduction Implications for 2030 and 2050

Details on the Carbon Tax (Tax for Climate Change Mitigation)

FINDING YOUR CHEAPEST WAY TO A LOW CARBON FUTURE. The Danish Levelized Cost of Energy Calculator

Impacts of AB 32 on California s electricity sector

EU energy and climate policies beyond 2020

World Simulations with GEM-E3

Creating a Successful Outcome in Copenhagen. Bert Metz, European Climate Foundation

NATURAL GAS DEMAND AND SUPPLY Long Term Outlook to 2030

Carbon footprint and GHG Inventories : two approaches for a better understanding of climate issues

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

ANNEX 1 COMPARISON OF WORLD ENERGY STUDIES

Role of Natural Gas in a Sustainable Energy Future

From Carbon Subsidy to Carbon Tax: India s Green Actions 1

Kilian GROSS Acting Head of Unit, A1, DG ENER European Commission

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

Intended Nationally Determined Contributions under the UNFCCC. Discussion paper

THE DIVEST-INVEST MOVEMENT STOPPING CLIMATE CHANGE BY MOVING THE TRILLIONS TBLI EUROPE NOVEMBER 2015

Renewable Choice Energy

UNECE Energy Week Geneva. in Energy Security

UNEP IMF GIZ - GSI workshop. Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies for an Inclusive Green Economy

THE UK CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAMME AND EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE. Gabrielle Edwards United Kingdom

WORLD ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK 2014 FACTSHEET OVERVIEW

Interview: Aurélie Faure, Financial Analyst at Dexia Asset Management

Source: Colombian Biennial Update Report, IDEAM 2015

A transition to a Green Economy - A change in paradigm or greener shade of brown?

Nordea Asset Management. Our Approach on Climate Change

public support for climate and energy policies in november 2011

Energy Benchmarking City of New Westminster: Corporate Facilities

What Development for Bioenergy in Asia: A Long-term Analysis of the Effects of Policy Instruments using TIAM-FR model

Latin America and COP20

Energy Projections Price and Policy Considerations. Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Some micro- and macro-economics of offshore wind*

Transcription:

BROWN TO GREEN: G2 TRANSITION TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER Argentina This country profile assesses Argentina s past, present and indications of future performance towards a low-carbon economy by evaluating emissions, decarbonisation, climate policy performance and climate finance. The profile summarises the respective findings from, amongst others, the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI, operated by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe), the Climate Action Tracker (CAT, operated by Climate Analytics, NewClimate Institute, Ecofys and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), and analyses from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Human Development Index.84.82 1 G2 average Share of global GHG emissions.7% GHG emissions per capita (t e/cap) 9.3 8.7 G2 average Share of global GDP $.7% $ 16,72 GDP per capita $ G2 average $ $ 15,71 Source: UNDP, data for 215 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 212 Source: IEA, data for 213 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS Total emissions (Mt e/a) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 Historic emissions (excluding forestry) Max & min current policy emissions projections (excluding forestry) Energy-related emissions CCPI evaluation of emissions level and trend 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Energy-related emissions per capita G2 average of energy-related emissions per capita 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Emissions per capita (t /capita) After years of increasing, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions levelled in 26 and fell slightly in 211. Projections show a rising trend in the future, although the growth could either be limited to a level not far above current emissions, or could result in a level twice as high. Energy-related carbon dioxide ( ) emissions account for more than half of total GHG emissions. Energy-related per capita emissions are steadily rising, but still below the G2 average. The CCPI ranks Argentina s emissions level as medium and the last five years show a negative trend. Composition of GHG emissions * CO 57% 2 N 2 O 16% CH 4 27% F-Gases.3% emissions from forestry -1% * emissions incl. LULUCF Source: Annex I countries: UNFCCC (215); Non-Annex I countries: IEA (214) and CAT (215) Sources: Past energy related emissions from the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI); past non-energy and future emissions projections from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT). CCPI calculations are primary based on the most recent IEA data; CAT calculations are based on national policies and country communications. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

DECARBONISATION Energy intensity of the economy Total Primary Energy Supply per GDP PPP (MJ per 25 US dollar) 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 1992 1996 2 22 24 26 28 21 212 The energy intensity of Argentina s economy (TPES/GDP) peaked in 22, just below the G2 average. Since then, the economy s energy intensity continued its downward development and is still relatively low compared to the other G2 countries. The CCPI ranks Argentina s energy intensity level as medium, with a positive trend. Energy intensity Average energy intensity in G2 Source: CCPI, 216 CCPI evaluation of energy intensity of GDP Carbon intensity of the energy sector Tonnes of per TPES (t /TJ) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The emissions per primary energy ( /TPES) in Argentina range between 52 and 56 t per TJ, below the G2 average. The CCPI ranking for the carbon intensity of the energy sector is rated as medium, while a worsening intensity trend is visible. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Carbon intensity (past trend) Average carbon intensity in G2 Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway CCPI evaluation of carbon intensity of energy sector Sources: Past: CCPI; future projections: CAT Share of coal in Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% 6 5 4 3 2 1 Total coal in TPES [TJ] The share of coal in the total primary energy supply is very low in Argentina. Since 199, it has varied between 1% and 2%, far below the G2 average and the global 2 C compatible benchmark. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Evaluation of coal share in TPES % of coal (past trend) Average % of coal in G2 Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway (min & max) Total coal consumption (TJ) poor medium good Source: CAT Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

Renewable energy in TPES and electricity sector 5% 3 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 25 2 15 1 5 Total renewable energy in TPES [TJ] Argentina s share of renewable energy in electricity has varied strongly over recent decades. After reaching a peak in 22, at 44%, it fell to 24% in 212. Future projections predict a new increase until 225. The share of renewable energy in Argentina s primary energy supply has been, apart from a temporary increase from 21 to 23, relatively constant, at about 7%, below the G2 average. In comparison to the other countries, the CCPI assesses Argentina s level of renewable energy as poor, while the trend is more promising. % of renewable energy in electricity (past trend) % of renewable energy in electricity (current policy projections) % of renewable energy in TPES (past trend) G2 average % of renewable energy in TPES Total renewable energy consumption (TJ) Sources: CCPI and CAT CCPI evaluation of renewable share in TPES Electricity demand per capita The electricity demand per capita has more than doubled since 199, but is still below the G2 average. Future projections predict growth will continue. Emissions intensity of the electricity sector The intensity of emissions in the electricity sector has strongly varied over recent decades. Starting from around 394 g per kwh in 199, emissions intensity reached a low in 22. Growth then restarted, until intensity again reached 199 levels. Despite this worrying development, notably decrease until 23 is expected. Electricity demand per capita [kwh/cap] 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Emissions intensity of electricity [g /kwh] 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Electricity demand per capita (past trend) Average electricity demand per capita in G2 Electricity demand per capita (current policy projections) Emissions intensity (past trend) Average emissions intensity in G2 Emissions intensity (current policy projections) Good practice benchmark: without nuclear or large hydro potential (Denmark) Good practice benchmark: with large hydro potential (Norway) Source: CAT, 215 Source: CAT, 215 Evaluation of the electricity emission intensity poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

CLIMATE POLICY PERFORMANCE Checklist of the climate policy framework Climate policy evaluation by experts Low emissions development plan for 25* 25 GHG emissions target Building codes, standards and incentives for low-emissions options Support scheme for renewables in the power sector Emissions performance standards for cars Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Carbon tax In the 216 evaluation, the CCPI experts ranked Argentina s climate policy performance as relatively poor over recent years. On the international level there has been no visible change, but national climate policy has deteriorated. Experts recommend stronger requirements and controls in the industrial sector and pointed to the missing funding required to successfully promote renewable energy and other CO2 emission reduction measures. The CCPI evaluates a country s performance in national and international climate policy through feedback from national energy and climate experts. very good * Understood as decarbonisation plans and not specifically as the plans called for in the Paris Agreement Source: Climate Policy Database, 216 good medium CCPI evaluation of climate policy poor very poor CCPI 28 CCPI 29 CCPI 21 CCPI 211 CCPI 212 CCPI edition CCPI 213 CCPI 214 CCPI 215 CCPI 216 National International Source: CCPI, 216 Total emissions (Mt e/a) Compatibility of national climate targets (INDCs) with a 2 C scenario 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 Historic emissions (excluding forestry) Current policy emissions projections (excluding forestry) CAT evaluation of Argentina s Intended National Determinded Contributions (INDC) inadequate medium sufficient role model Source: CAT, 215 22 26 21 214 218 Fair emissions reduction range in a 2 C pathway 222 Emissions in INDC scenario (min & max) 226 23 Max Max Min Min Max Min Argentina submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) on October 1, 215, with an unconditional target to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 15% below business as usual (BAU) by 23. The target includes the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector. Excluding LULUCF emissions, the INDC is equivalent to a 6% increase of emissions above 21 by 23, or 128% above 199 levels. Argentina s conditional target is to reduce emissions by 3% below BAU by 23, including LULUCF. This is equivalent to a 3% increase above 21 levels by 23 or 85% above 199 levels (excluding LULUCF). The CAT rates Argentina s INDC as inadequate : its targets are inconsistent with limiting warming to below 2 C. If all countries adopted this level of ambition, global warming would likely exceed 3 4 C in the 21st century. Further, Argentina is likely to meet its proposed targets with currently implemented policies, representing little effort beyond current actions. Under the current plans to achieve its unconditional INDC, emissions from all sectors are projected to grow by more than 25% from 212 23. The energy, agriculture and cattle-ranching sectors will account for more than 87% of total emissions by 23. More ambitious new policies are needed for Argentina to get closer to what would be a fair contribution, given its potentials and capabilities. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

FINANCING THE TRANSITION Investment attractiveness Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor LOW Climate Transparency rates Argentina s investment attractiveness as low, due to difficult macroeconomic conditions, little past experience with low carbon technologies, limited growth in green financing and - until recently - a less favourable policy environment to facilitate investments. RECAI* (E&Y index) Category (own assessment) LOW Sources: Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor and RECAI reports Trend** *Adapted from RECAI and re-classified in 3 categories (low, medium, high) for comparison purposes with Allianz Monitor. **Taken from RECAI issue of May 216 no data The Allianz Energy & Climate Monitor ranks G2 member states on their relative fitness as potential investment destinations for building low-carbon electricity infrastructure. The investment attractiveness of a country is assessed through four categories: Policy adequacy, Policy reliability of sustained support, Market absorption capacity and the National investment conditions. The Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) produces score and rankings for countries attractiveness based on Macro drivers, Energy market drivers and Technology-specific drivers which together compress a set of 5 drivers, 16 parameters and over 5 datasets. Historical investments in renewable energy and investment gap This section shows Argentina s current investments in the overall power sector (including distribution and transmission) as well as in renewable energy expressed as the share of the total annual investments needed to be in line with a 2 C compatible trajectory. Investments in the power sector Investments in renewable energy for the power sector % of current investments in the power sector compared to the investment needs under a 2 C pathway 53% 51% % of current investments for renewable energy in the power sector compared to the investment needs under a 2 C pathway Source: Adapted from WEIO, 214 (1) (1) WEIO (214) compares annual average investments from 2 to 213 with average annual investments needed from 215 to 23 under a 2 C scenario Carbon pricing mechanisms Emissions Trading Schemes (ETS) An ETS caps the total level of GHG emissions and allows industries to trade allowances based on their marginal abatement cost. By creating a supply and demand for allowances, an ETS establishes a market price for GHG emissions. Carbon Tax To date, Argentina does not have an emissions trading scheme (ETS) or a carbon tax, either in place, or under consideration. GHG A Carbon tax directly sets a price on carbon by defining a tax rate on GHG emissions or more commonly on the carbon content of fossil fuels. Unlike an ETS, a carbon tax is a price-based instrument that pre-defines the carbon price, but not the emissions reduction outcome of a carbon tax. Sources: World Bank and Ecofys, 216; other national sources Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

Fossil fuel subsidies While Argentina has taken measures to rationalise consumption subsidies for butane gas in order to discourage wasteful consumption, production subsidies for fossil fuels have not seen significant reforms. In recent years, Argentina has introduced tax breaks for companies investing in oil and gas production. For example, in 213, Argentina amended its laws to allow oil and gas companies that invested over US$1 billion in the country to sell 2% of their production abroad after five years without paying export taxes or repatriating profits, which acts as an incentive for companies looking to invest in oil and gas production. Average annual national subsidies (213-14)* Argentina G2 total % of government s income from oil and gas production (213)* $2.2 billion 3.4% $7 billion Source: ODI, 215 *The indicators above refer only to subsidies for fossil fuel production, and include direct spending (e.g. government budget expenditure on infrastructure that specifically benefits fossil fuels), tax expenditure (e.g. tax deductions for investment in drilling and mining equipment) and other support mechanisms (e.g. capacity mechanisms). Public climate finance Argentina is not listed in Annex II of the UNFCCC, and is therefore not formally obliged to provide climate finance. While climate-related spending by multilateral development banks may exist, it has not been included in this report. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy