Flow Over a Cylinder

Similar documents
GAMBIT Demo Tutorial

Steady Flow: Laminar and Turbulent in an S-Bend

Abaqus/CFD Sample Problems. Abaqus 6.10

Express Introductory Training in ANSYS Fluent Lecture 1 Introduction to the CFD Methodology

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

ME6130 An introduction to CFD 1-1

Use of OpenFoam in a CFD analysis of a finger type slug catcher. Dynaflow Conference 2011 January , Rotterdam, the Netherlands

External bluff-body flow-cfd simulation using ANSYS Fluent

Keywords: Heat transfer enhancement; staggered arrangement; Triangular Prism, Reynolds Number. 1. Introduction

This tutorial provides a recipe for simulating L

O.F.Wind Wind Site Assessment Simulation in complex terrain based on OpenFOAM. Darmstadt,

Application of CFD Simulation in the Design of a Parabolic Winglet on NACA 2412

Using CFD to improve the design of a circulating water channel

The influence of mesh characteristics on OpenFOAM simulations of the DrivAer model

TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FORCED CONVECTION FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER IN A LAMINAR CHANNEL FLOW

Turbulence Modeling in CFD Simulation of Intake Manifold for a 4 Cylinder Engine

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

CFD ANALYSIS OF RAE 2822 SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOIL AT TRANSONIC MACH SPEEDS

Multiphase Flow - Appendices

Customer Training Material. Lecture 2. Introduction to. Methodology ANSYS FLUENT. ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2010 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN A 3D SQUARE CHANNEL LAMINAR FLOW WITH USING BAFFLES 1 Vikram Bishnoi

CFD SIMULATION OF SDHW STORAGE TANK WITH AND WITHOUT HEATER

THE CFD SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND THE AIRCRAFT USING OPENFOAM AND ANSA

Set up and solve a transient problem using the pressure-based solver and VOF model.

Basics of vehicle aerodynamics

Module 6 Case Studies

Lecture 6 - Boundary Conditions. Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics

A. Hyll and V. Horák * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic

Dimensional Analysis

COMPARISON OF SOLUTION ALGORITHM FOR FLOW AROUND A SQUARE CYLINDER

CFD Analysis of a butterfly valve in a compressible fluid

Experiment 3 Pipe Friction

CHEG 3128 Heat, Mass, & Kinetics Laboratory Diffusion in Laminar Flow Regimes Modeling and COMSOL Tutorial Tutorial by Andrea Kadilak

How To Model A Horseshoe Vortex

. Address the following issues in your solution:

Aerodynamic Department Institute of Aviation. Adam Dziubiński CFD group FLUENT

FLUID FLOW Introduction General Description

Introduction to COMSOL. The Navier-Stokes Equations

Along-wind self-excited forces of two-dimensional cables under extreme wind speeds

CFD Analysis on Airfoil at High Angles of Attack

Problem Statement In order to satisfy production and storage requirements, small and medium-scale industrial

AN EFFECT OF GRID QUALITY ON THE RESULTS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE FLUID FLOW FIELD IN AN AGITATED VESSEL

A fundamental study of the flow past a circular cylinder using Abaqus/CFD

Learning Module 4 - Thermal Fluid Analysis Note: LM4 is still in progress. This version contains only 3 tutorials.

A Comparison of Analytical and Finite Element Solutions for Laminar Flow Conditions Near Gaussian Constrictions

Lecture 11 Boundary Layers and Separation. Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics

CFD software overview comparison, limitations and user interfaces

Effect of Pressure Ratio on Film Cooling of Turbine Aerofoil Using CFD

Introductory FLUENT Training

Trace Layer Import for Printed Circuit Boards Under Icepak

CFD Analysis of Civil Transport Aircraft

Benchmarking COMSOL Multiphysics 3.5a CFD problems

AB3080 L. Learning Objectives: About the Speaker:

CFD ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLABLE PITCH PROPELLER USED IN MARINE VEHICLE

Finding Drag Coefficient using Solidworks Flow Simulation

Navier-Stokes Equation Solved in Comsol 4.1. Copyright Bruce A. Finlayson, 2010 See also Introduction to Chemical Engineering Computing, Wiley (2006).

CFD and EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS of VORTEX SHEDDING BEHIND D-SHAPED CYLINDER

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Tutorial for laboratory project #2 Using ANSYS Workbench. For Double Pipe Heat Exchanger

Eco Pelmet Modelling and Assessment. CFD Based Study. Report Number R1D1. 13 January 2015

Flow Physics Analysis of Three-Bucket Helical Savonius Rotor at Twist Angle Using CFD

Numerical Simulation of the External Flow Field. Around a Bluff Car*

1. Lid driven flow in a cavity [Time: 1 h 30 ]

Design and Analysis of Various Bluff Objects for Vortex flow meters

Adaptation of General Purpose CFD Code for Fusion MHD Applications*

The Influence of Aerodynamics on the Design of High-Performance Road Vehicles

Aerodynamics of Rotating Discs

THERMAL STRATIFICATION IN A HOT WATER TANK ESTABLISHED BY HEAT LOSS FROM THE TANK

CFD analysis for road vehicles - case study

Numerical Investigation of Heat Transfer Characteristics in A Square Duct with Internal RIBS

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF WELLS TURBINE FOR WAVE POWER CONVERSION

FLow pattern around cable and its aerodynamic characteristics in critical Reynolds number range

Simulation of Flow Field and Particle Trajectories in Hard Disk Drive Enclosures

Simulation of Fluid-Structure Interactions in Aeronautical Applications

Performance prediction of a centrifugal pump working in direct and reverse mode using Computational Fluid Dynamics

SINGLE TRAIN PASSING THROUGH A TUNNEL

OpenFOAM Opensource and CFD

ME 305 Fluid Mechanics I. Part 8 Viscous Flow in Pipes and Ducts

Modeling and Numerical Blood Flow Analysis of Tibial Artery using CFD

Performance Comparison of a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine using Commercial and Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics based Codes

CCTech TM. ICEM-CFD & FLUENT Software Training. Course Brochure. Simulation is The Future

CFD Study on the Diffuser of a Formula 3 Racecar

Chapter 10. Flow Rate. Flow Rate. Flow Measurements. The velocity of the flow is described at any

CHAPTER 4 CFD ANALYSIS OF THE MIXER

A CODE VERIFICATION EXERCISE FOR THE UNSTRUCTURED FINITE-VOLUME CFD SOLVER ISIS-CFD

(1) 2 TEST SETUP. Table 1 Summary of models used for calculating roughness parameters Model Published z 0 / H d/h

Computational Modeling of Wind Turbines in OpenFOAM

Contents. Microfluidics - Jens Ducrée Physics: Fluid Dynamics 1

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Lecture 16 - Free Surface Flows. Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics

Heat Transfer by Free Convection

HEAVY OIL FLOW MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES

Michael W. Kuenstle, AIA School of Architecture, University of Florida, U.S.A.

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIATE PRESSURE STEAM TURBINE

All the following videos are at this YouTube playlist:

du u U 0 U dy y b 0 b

Mathematical Model of Blood Flow in Carotid Bifurcation. Phd student: Eng. Emanuel Muraca. 16/10/09 Milan

Transcription:

Flow Over a Cylinder Abstract In this exercise, the flow over a cylinder is modeled. The cylinder is represented in two dimensions by a circle, and a flow domain is created surrounding the circle. The diameter of the cylinder can be specified, and the flow domain is adjusted based on these dimensions. Coarse, medium, and fine mesh types are available. Material properties (density and viscosity), approach velocity, and physical models (inviscid and viscous) can be specified within limits. Both steady and unsteady flow fields can be modeled. Static and total pressure, velocity at the outlet, drag coefficient, and average shear stress are reported. Plots of pressure coefficient, pressure distribution, friction coefficient, wall shear stress, and x-velocity distribution are available. Contours of static pressure, total pressure, velocity, and stream function can be displayed. A velocity vector plot is also available. 1 Introduction Flow over a cylinder is a fundamental fluid mechanics problem of practical importance. The flow field over the cylinder is symmetric at low values of Reynolds number. As the Reynolds number increases, flow begins to separate behind the cylinder causing vortex shedding which is an unsteady phenomenon. You can apply either a steady state or an unsteady (time dependent) solver to capture these effects, as appropriate. Drag forces acting on the walls of the cylinder are highly dependent upon Reynolds number. The effects of viscosity and flow separation upon pressure distribution can be observed. This exercise demonstrates that the drag coefficient and wall-shear stress depend upon the Reynolds number. Additionally, the concept of dynamic similarity can be explored by comparing different combinations of cylinder diameter and flow field velocity, while maintaining a constant Reynolds number. Plots of pressure distribution and pressure coefficients along the surface of the cylinder demonstrate the effects of flow separation on these parameters. It is also possible to animate the contour and vector plots to visualize vortex shedding. 2 Modeling Details The flow field around the cylinder is modeled in two dimensions with the axis of the cylinder perpendicular to the direction of flow. The cylinder is modeled as a circle and a square flow domain is created around the cylinder (Figure 2.1). A uniform velocity at the inlet of the flow domain can be specified. The procedure for solving the problem is: 1. Create the geometry (cylinder and the flow domain). 2. Set the material properties and boundary conditions. 3. Mesh the domain. FlowLab creates the geometry and mesh, and exports the mesh to FLUENT. The boundary conditions and flow properties are set through parameterized case files. FLUENT converges the problem until the convergence limit is met or the number of specified iterations is achieved. 1

Figure 2.1: Flow Domain 2.1 Geometry A flow domain is created surrounding the cylinder. The upstream length is 15 times the radius of the cylinder, and the downstream length is 40 times the radius of the cylinder. The width of the flow domain is 50 times the radius of the cylinder. To facilitate meshing, a square with a side length of six times the radius of the cylinder is created around the cylinder. The square is split into four pieces as shown in Figure 2.1. 2.2 Mesh Coarse, medium, and fine mesh types are available. Mesh density varies based upon the assigned Refinement Factor. The Refinement Factor values for the mesh densities are given in Table 2.1. Mesh Density Refinement Factor Fine 1 Medium 1.3 Coarse 1.69 Table 2.1: Refinement Factor 2 c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005

Using the Refinement Factor, First Cell Height is calculated with the following formula: [ Y plus (Characteristic Length 0.125 V iscosity 0.875 ] ) F irst Cell Height = Refinement F actor (0.199 V elocity 0.875 Density 0.875 ) (2-1) Reynolds number is used to determine Yplus. Yplus values for turbulent flow conditions are summarized in Table 2.2. Reynolds Number Flow Regime Yplus/First Cell Height Re < 1000 Laminar First Cell Height = Cylinder Radius/24 1000 Re 20000 Turbulent, Enhanced Wall Treatment Yplus < 10 Re > 20000 Turbulent, Standard Wall Functions Yplus > 30 Table 2.2: Flow Regime Vs. Reynolds Number The number of intervals along each edge is determined using geometric progression and the following equation: { } Intervals = INT Log Edge length (Growth ratio 1) F irst Cell Height + 1.0 (2-2) Log(Growth ratio) A boundary layer with 10 rows is placed at the cylinder wall using the calculated value of First Cell Height. The edges are meshed using the First Cell Height and the calculated number of intervals. The entire domain is meshed using a map scheme (Figure 2.2). Figure 2.2: Mesh Generated by FlowLab c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005 3

2.3 Physical Models for FLUENT The user interface updates based upon whether the steady or unsteady solver is selected. The time step size, the number of iterations per time step, the total number of time steps, and the convergence limit for each time step must be specified if the unsteady solver is used. The total number of iterations and the convergence limit must be specified if the steady solver is used. Based on the Reynolds number, the following physical models are recommended: Re < 1000 Laminar flow 1000 Re 10000 Low Reynolds number k ɛ model Re > 10000 k ɛ model Table 2.3: Physical Models Based on Reynolds Number If turbulence is selected in the Physics form of the Operation menu, the appropriate turbulence model and wall treatment is applied based upon the Reynolds number. 2.4 Material Properties The default properties provided in this exercise represent water. The following material properties can be specified: Density Viscosity 2.5 Boundary Conditions The following boundary conditions can be specified: Inlet velocity Wall roughness * * To be specified only when the flow is modeled as turbulent. The following boundary conditions are assigned in FLUENT. Boundary Cylinder Inlet Side boundaries Outlet Assigned As Wall Velocity inlet Periodic Pressure outlet Table 2.4: Boundary Conditions Assigned in FLUENT 2.6 Solution The mesh is exported to FLUENT along with the physical properties and the initial conditions specified. The material properties and the initial conditions are read through the case file. The frequency at which the results file (neutral file) is saved is written in the journal file file for the unsteady solver using the execute command. When the solution is converged or the specified number of iterations is met, FLUENT writes the case and data files. GAMBIT reads the neutral and.xy plot files for postprocessing. 4 c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005

3 Scope and Limitations FlowLab automatically sets the time step size such that 50 time iterations are performed in one shedding cycle. Increasing the time step size may lead to incorrect predictions. It is recommended to use at least 20 time iterations for one cycle of vortex shedding. Enhanced wall treatment is used for turbulent flow conditions to predict the drag coefficient accurately for Reynold s numbers between 1000 to 5000. For a Reynolds number higher than 5000, the cell count and the simulation run time increases exponentially. To reduce simulation run time at higher Reynold s numbers, standard wall functions were imposed at Reynolds number greater than 20000. However, standard wall functions may lead to inaccurate drag predictions at these higher Reynolds numbers. Difficulty in obtaining convergence or poor accuracy may result if input values are used outside the upper and lower limits suggested in the problem overview. 4 Exercise Results 4.1 Reports The following reports are available: Static pressure difference Total pressure difference Average velocity at the outlet Total drag coefficient on the cylinder Average shear stress on the cylinder * * Available only for viscous flow. 4.2 XY Plots The plots reported by FlowLab include: Residuals Pressure coefficient distribution over cylinder Pressure distribution over cylinder X-velocity distribution along center line Friction coefficient distribution * CD history CL history X-wall shear distribution over cylinder * Wall Yplus distribution ** * Available only for viscous flow. ** Available only when the flow is modeled as turbulent. c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005 5

Figure 4.1 represents the distribution of pressure coefficient over the cylinder. Figure 4.1: Pressure Coefficient Distribution at Re = 150 4.3 Contour Plots Contours of static pressure, total pressure, velocity, and stream function can be displayed. A velocity vector plot is also available. All contour plots can be animated if the time dependent solver was used to converge a solution. Contours of velocity magnitude, x-velocity, y-velocity, turbulence intensity and dissipation rate, stream function, and temperature can be displayed. Figure 4.2 represents velocity contours at a Reynolds number of 150, showing a time dependent solution. 6 c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005

Figure 4.2: Velocity Contours for Re = 150 at time = 4000 s 5 Verification of Results Table 5.1 represents predicted drag coefficient as a function of Reynolds number. These results were obtained using default settings for geometry and material properties with the fine mesh option. The desired Reynolds number was obtained by varying the inlet velocity. Re Computed Drag Experimental Coefficient Results [1] 1 14.87 13.0 40 1.715 1.8 150 1.33 1.5 500 1.35 1.2 1000 1.115 0.9 5000 1.021 0.98 1e06 0.27 0.25 Table 5.1: Computed Vs. Experimental Values Drag Coefficient The frequency of vortex shedding behind the cylinder is characterized by the Strouhal number, given by: St = fd U (5-1) c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005 7

where, f = frequency of vortex shedding U = approach velocity of the fluid D = diameter of the cylinder Strouhal number verification has been performed for a Reynolds number of 150 with a cylinder diameter 0.1 m and an inlet velocity of 0.0015 m/s. For a Reynolds number of 150, the experimentally value of the Strouhal number is approximately 0.172 [2]. The time period of the flow oscillation predicted by FlowLab is approximately 385 s, which is evaluated by plotting the lift history over the cylinder (Figure 5.1). The numerically predicted value of Strouhal number for this case is 0.173, which differs by 0.64% from the experimentally determined value. Figure 5.1: Time History of Lift Coefficient 6 Sample Problems 6.1 Inviscid Case 1. Run time dependent cases using the inviscid option for several velocity values. 2. Plot pressure coefficient versus position and compare with theory. 3. Explain how and why the local pressure varies around the sides of the cylinder. 4. What is the drag force acting on the cylinder? How is it determined? 8 c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005

6.2 Viscous (Viscid) Case 1. Set the Reynolds number to 150 and run a time dependent case using the viscous flow option. 2. Compare predicted drag coefficient with the corresponding theoretical value. 3. How does pressure coefficient distribution vary between the viscid and inviscid cases? 4. Plot velocity vectors and evaluate the flow pattern around the cylinder. 5. Compare the drag coefficient values with experimental data or correlation over a Reynolds number range of 1 to 1.0e+6. 6. Observe velocity vectors as Reynolds number increases. 7. Explain why the pressure distribution profile flattens out at the back of the cylinder, and compare the pressure distribution profile with the velocity vector field assessing the region of flow separation. 8. Animate the velocity contour results and review vortex shedding behavior. 7 Reference [1] Anderson, J.D., Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 2 nd Ed., Ch. 3: pp. 229. [2] Shames, I. H., Mechanics of Fluid, 3 rd Ed., Ch. 13: pp. 669-675. 8 Authors 1. Ashish Kulkarni Fluent India Pvt. Ltd. Pune, India kaa@fluent.co.in 2. Shane Moeykens Fluent Inc. Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA sam@fluent.com c Fluent Inc. [FlowLab 1.2], January 6, 2005 9