Summary Report on Community Stakeholders Meeting June 4, 2008

Similar documents
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES Fall Semester 2001 through Spring Semester 2004 (past five semesters)

January 2014 Preliminary survey report: the skill needs of major Canadian employers

21ST CENTURY STUDENT OUTCOMES:

Members respond to help identify what makes RNs unique and valuable to healthcare in Alberta.

The Department Faculty approved the following student learning outcomes for the Undergraduate BA/BS major in April 2011.

HAMPTON UNIVERSITY ONLINE Hampton University School of Nursing MHA in Health Administration

Clayton State University Master of Health Administration Program Fall 2009 Assessment

MASTERS SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT

School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan

New Hires Research Highlights Report March 2012

Dear Colleagues, Best Regards, Pamela L. Quinones, RDH, BS

SPEA CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3 RD YEAR REPORT MAY 2008

University of Georgia Libraries Diversity Plan 2013

Healthcare Administration Program. University Outcomes: Lifelong Learners, Skilled Professionals

Graduate Program Goals Statements School of Social Work College of Education and Human Development

Healthy People 2020 and Education For Health Successful Practices in Undergraduate Public Health Programs

2009 MASTER PLAN/PROGRESS REPORT

Doctorate in Educational Leadership. Purpose. Requirements. Philosophy, Goals and Objectives

Report of the Delaware School Library Survey 2004

Program Respiratory Therapy. Department Analytical and Diagnostic Sciences. College Allied Health Sciences. Year 2014

Program Director Self-Study Report For Program: MS Operations & Supply Management (MSOSM) Submitted by: James Keyes, PhD.

ASSOCIATION FOR GENERAL AND LIBERAL STUDIES 2008 AGLS Awards for Improving General Education: Effective Program Processes

Pittsburgh Public Schools. We Dream Big. We Work Hard. We Promise. Promise-Readiness Corps

Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Enrollment Degrees Awarded

1 Past AOL reports and reviews are available at

Economics Proposal for CORE 2014 due by February 1, 2013

DOÑA ANA BRANCH COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Strategic Plan Revision THIS DOCUMENT REFLECTS FINAL EDITING COMPLETED APRIL 10, 2003.

The Older Learners: Reinventing Yourself Through Education. Bob Gallo Senior State Director AARP Illinois October, 2010

WRITING INTENSIVE COURSES (definition, implementation, and resolution voted 1/23/2013)

Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals

Program Guidebook Industrial and Organizational Psychology, M.A. - Chicago

COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SCIENCES. Biostatistics MPH Handbook

PROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR PORTFOLIO I. Introduction

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

SCHEV Core Competencies

Proposal for Dual Degree Program Master of Education in Higher Education (M.Ed.) / Master of Public Policy and Administration (MPPA)

Agenda Items I.1.a.(1) and I.1.a.(2)

AACC Position Statement on the Associate Degree

Delivered in an Online Format. Revised November 1, I. Perspectives

Academic Year Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan. Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences

DOCTORAL DEGREE IN EDUCATION. Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

Boise State University Department of Construction Management Quality Assessment Report and Action Plan

Executive Summary Strategic Plan:

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

I. CHESTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION-GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY SHEET

Annual Report on the Virginia Plan for Higher Education. State Council of Higher Education for Virginia

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD ACADEMIC SENATE NEW MINOR: HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT RES AAC/BPC

Degree Level Expectations for Graduates Receiving the

Meeting of NJIT Self Study Chairs and Co-Chairs Middle States Accreditation Year 2 Launch

Department of Construction

P21 Framework Definitions

Examinable Competencies: A Progress Report. The 2010 University-Public Service Roundtable October 25, 2010 RDIMS

Gettysburg College. Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Plan. Subcommittee on Learning Outside the Classroom. June 15, 2003.

Academic Affairs Working Plan

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

College of Education. Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations. MS.Ed in Educational Administration.

Results of the Spring, 2011 Administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement at New Mexico Highlands University

ASSESSMENT PLAN Computer Science, MS Updated May 25, 2007

Our Department will be nationally recognized for its innovation and impact in Family Medicine and Community Health

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

EC2000 CRITERION 2: A PROCEDURE FOR CREATING, ASSESSING, AND DOCUMENTING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Business and Public Administration Outcomes Assessment Plan; April 1, 2011 Page 1

Executive Summary. Baker County High School

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (Non-EMBA) COURSES Student Learning Outcomes 1

Leadership Portfolio

Introduction. Page 2 of 11

Program Guidebook International Psychology PhD, - Online-Blended

STRATEGY FOR ENHANCING STUDENT EMPLOYABILITY

LETTER OF INTENT DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HEALTH SERVICES POLICY AND PRACTICE UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

The Pre- Eminence of California s Community College Early Childhood Education Workforce Instruction Threatened by Funding Cuts

Transfer Pathway for Theatre

DOCTORAL DEGREE IN EDUCATION. Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling

What do advertising professionals really want? Preparing University graduates for careers in the Middle East

Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?

BSBA Program Goals. 2. To obtain specialized knowledge of a single business discipline or functional area

Graduate. scholars to. developing. meet the. scholarly learning. The inten establish. curriculum 1. programs. There are concisely

Would I Follow Me? An Introduction to Management Leadership in the Workplace

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

North Carolina School Nurse Evaluation Process

Bloomsburg University Midterm and Final Competency Field Evaluation. Task Supervisor (if appropriate) :

Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of a Service Learning Program

Youth Development Institute. Advancing Youth Development. A Curriculum for Training Youth Workers

EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY. Assessment of Academic Achievement ANNUAL ASSESSMENT PLAN ACCOUNTING. Master of Science

GLOBAL AVIATION EDUCATION IN AN ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: THE DANIEL WEBSTER COLLEGE EXPERIENCE

The Five Key Elements of Student Engagement

CTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT

Computer Systems Technology AAS

Strategic Plan The College of Business Oregon State University. Strategic Plan. Approved June 2012 Updated June 2013 Updated June 2014

Delaware State University. Reflecting on our past while preparing for our future

Partnering with. Local Support Regional Impact

Program Self-Evaluation and ACLS Monitoring Tool. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Adult and Community Learning Services

BS Environmental Science ( )

IDOL Outcomes and Competencies (ibstpi) 2

Guidance for PA/H 509 Field Supervisors

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

GOAL #1: Promote a culture of quality academic advising through advisor education, recognition and reward, and advising program assessment.

Leadership and Management Competencies

Maryland Branch Campus

Transcription:

Summary Report on Community Stakeholders Meeting June 4, 2008 I. Background Introduction Consultation with the community is an important part of the ongoing strategic planning efforts at CSUB. Recently, President Horace Mitchell invited to campus about 120 community leaders, representing a wide range of industries, to engage in focused discussions regarding current and future trends in both their industries and the community as a whole, and their perspectives on future actions that might be undertaken at CSUB to better prepare students for productive employment and citizenship. The event took place just prior to the end of the academic year on the morning of June 4, 2008 with 36 community leaders in attendance. Sheryl Barbich, community leader, CSUB Foundation Board member and president of Greater Bakersfield Vision 20/20 Inc., provided organizational support and served as the event facilitator. Over the summer, the data were analyzed and two reports prepared: this summary report and an expanded report which can be found on the CSUB website: www.csub.edu/documents/stakeholders.pdf. This report describes the organization of those meetings, summarizes the feedback provided by the community leaders in attendance, and communicates to the participants and the community as a whole some of the action plans to be undertaken in response to the feedback provided to us. The Meetings After beginning the day as a group, the participants were divided into small, industryspecific groups. A broad spectrum of businesses, both large and small, was represented in the following groups: o Energy, agriculture and construction o Healthcare o Non-profit and communication o Finance and business o Governmental agencies The five focus groups, ranging in size from four to eight, were led by CSUB staff and faculty members in discussion that focused on the following areas: o Most significant trends for the sector 09/17/08 Page 1 of 5

o Implications of those trends and their impact on CSUB s educational offerings o Major challenges for the community over the next five, 10 and 20 years o Role CSUB should play in addressing those challenges o The essential workplace knowledge, competencies and attitudes necessary for success in local and global environments over the next five to 10 years The information that follows is a summary of the community stakeholders observations, challenges and needs. II. Feedback from the community stakeholders Community stakeholders were asked to convey their perceptions of CSUB and ideas about future directions in two ways. 1. Upon arrival, the stakeholders were asked to complete a brief questionnaire (the Community Stakeholder Survey). Thirty-one participants completed questionnaires. 2. Later, all 36 stakeholders in attendance participated in focus group discussions of current and future challenges in their sectors and the role that CSUB might play in preparing students to meet those future challenges. Community Stakeholder Survey The survey results show that stakeholders have a very positive image of CSUB. For example, virtually all agree that programs have been improving steadily in recent years, and that CSUB is headed in the right direction. When asked about the most important ways that CSUB contributes to the community, nearly all agreed that CSUB has a positive impact on the local economy in general, and in particular, on the professional development of workers and employers. The majority also indicated that CSUB contributes by partnering with community and business organizations and through research that supports local organizations, though slightly fewer were aware of the contributions made by students through internships and the activities of student groups. Every person who completed the questionnaire indicated that they hire CSUB graduates. When asked about CSUB graduates preparation for success in future employment and civic roles, the survey results show that stakeholders believe that a particular strength is in students mastery of knowledge in their major disciplines. Nearly all also indicated that students have strong interpersonal skills, and more than three-quarters agreed that students are well prepared in oral communication, critical reasoning and problem solving, and understanding diversity and cultural perspectives other than their own. Although the majority of stakeholders felt that students are well prepared in communication and interaction skills, many reported that they would like to see even more skill building in these areas. 09/17/08 Page 2 of 5

Stakeholders felt that CSUB graduates had other important strengths as well, including commitment to and connectedness with the local community, good work experience, and hands on capability. Finally, a majority of stakeholders indicated that they are interested in having more information about new developments with CSUB faculty and academic programs. Focus Group Discussions Stakeholders discussed current and future trends affecting their organizations, major challenges that may face the community over the next five years, and the role that CSUB should play in community efforts to address those challenges. Embedded within these discussions, participants detailed the types of knowledge, competencies and skills that are essential for students to succeed locally and globally. A number of skills were identified including writing and literacy, oral communication, critical thinking, quantitative skills, and computer skills. The stakeholders also noted the importance of people skills, including leadership skills, community engagement, ethics, and interacting and communicating with others from diverse backgrounds. Within discussions about industry-specific trends and challenges, the groups underscored the importance of CSUB continuing to emphasize skill building in the areas of technology, communication (both written and oral), leadership, and interpersonal relationships and interactions with others from diverse backgrounds, cultures and nations. Stakeholders felt the future trends in their industries were such that these skills would continue to increase in importance. While the Community Stakeholder Survey data showed that stakeholders have positive perceptions regarding the skills of CSUB graduates, the group discussions included ideas for further advancing graduate preparation. Many indicated that one way CSUB might enhance skill building is by expanding student opportunities for participation in applied assignments, internships and service learning. These activities were seen as ways for students to acquire a realistic set of expectations about entry-level careers. In all, five major themes predominated across the five focus groups. These themes are summarized briefly below. 1. Stakeholders discussed the increasing complexity of the social and physical environments in which their organizations operate. Locally, population growth appears to be outpacing supporting infrastructure, and an increasingly aged population adds pressure to the health care system. Organizations face a variety of environmental challenges, and often have difficulty finding workers skilled in areas for which jobs exist. Additionally, globalization has resulted in increased emphases on interactions among individuals and groups who are geographically distant and culturally diverse. Stakeholders felt that increasing access for potential students, including recruiting more students from traditionally underserved populations, as well as scheduling and course sequencing patterns to better serve non-traditional students would result in a 09/17/08 Page 3 of 5

better skilled work force. Stakeholders also felt that CSUB faculty and staff have the ability to provide valuable leadership for responding to local and global environments, and hoped that those activities would increase in the future. 2. An important trend affecting all industries concerns generational differences among workers. For example, stakeholders agree that younger and older cohorts differ greatly in terms of their career expectations. Younger cohorts appear to expect more rapid increases in salaries and career advancement than is the norm, without the same levels of focus on the job (i.e. to work overtime) than was true of older cohorts. Stakeholders report that communication and interaction patterns differ as well, with younger cohorts less adept at working in teams and engaging in dialogue. They felt that there was a need for increased skill and understanding on the part of both younger and older cohorts for the groups to succeed in working together productively. Stakeholders indicated that younger cohorts might be better prepared for the existing workplace contexts if their CSUB experiences included greater emphasis on applied assignments, internships and service learning. 3. In all industries, organizations operate within a continuously changing legal environment, and the need to understand and comply with complex regulations, mandates, and uncertain funding streams poses difficult challenges. There is an increased focus on finding ethical solutions to complex problems, both as an intrinsic value and for risk management. Stakeholders felt that in addition to teaching students about laws and regulations and their applications in particular fields, CSUB might also help students to understand how social policies, values and ethics influence decisions and behaviors in the workplace, as well as the possible professional consequences of personal choices. As is true of the other themes reported here, stakeholders across all industries voiced this perspective, from non-profit social welfare organizations and business and professional services to scientific and technical industries, such as oil and agriculture. 4. Stakeholders stressed the need for workers with well-developed interpersonal skills, able to engage in constructive dialogue and interact effectively with colleagues, clients and partners from diverse ethnic and national backgrounds, and to develop and maintain positive connections with the community. Opportunities for students to work in teams with others from diverse backgrounds and national origins were seen as an important way for them to begin to develop these skills prior to entering the work force. 5. Organizations of all types find that nearly all jobs require higher levels of technical skills than was true in the past. Workers need higher levels of proficiency in using common computer software packages (i.e. Microsoft Excel), as well as proficiency in making presentations, writing, critical thinking and mathematics. Additionally, because workers must adapt to 09/17/08 Page 4 of 5

continuously changing technology and work environments, an orientation toward lifelong learning was emphasized. Stakeholders encouraged a continued, and if possible, increased focus on skill building across the curriculum and expressed the desire for expanded course offerings in technical fields such as engineering and allied health sciences. In addition to the student-focused themes described above, stakeholders articulated a more holistic expectation of the relationship between CSUB and the community. In general, the community expects CSUB to maintain its high standards and continue advancing towards its vision of becoming a premier institution of higher learning. They expressed a desire for the university to become even more integrated into the life of the community including linking faculty and staff expertise to efforts aimed at addressing challenges and needs. III. Next Steps The results from the meeting with community stakeholders will be utilized by multiple campus groups and integrated into campus-wide discussions about remaining missionfocused and achieving our vision. Members of the President s Cabinet will review the feedback with each division s vice president to identify new initiatives and changes needed in current practices. Beginning in September, the Provost Council will use the community feedback in shaping and launching the development of an Academic Master Plan. Working with faculty and staff, this plan will identify new programmatic directions that extend our contributions to our region. The plan will define desired learning goals and ways of assessing how well our students are acquiring the knowledge, values and competencies (including those identified in the survey) that are essential to live, lead and be contributing members to our community, state and nation. Also starting in September, the University Strategic Planning Steering Committee and the six workgroups: 1) Faculty Excellence and Diversity, 2) Academic Program Excellence and Diversity, 3) Student Experience and Campus Life, 4) Community Engagement, 5) Staff Excellence and Diversity, 6) Campus Culture will incorporate the results of the community feedback into the development of campus-wide strategies that will be linked to specific and measurable outcomes. Updates on our progress and the ways in which the stakeholder s feedback is being utilized will be provided periodically through multiple communication vehicles, including the winter and spring editions of Inside CSUB and the President s Annual Report. 09/17/08 Page 5 of 5