SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Similar documents
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Overview and Highlights. Jenny Thomas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division July 2014

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

3.0 Project Description

DEQ Response to Comments regarding the Public Notice for a Coal Mining Project in the Panther Creek watershed In Craig and Nowata Counties.

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

1. INTRODUCTION 5. THE PERMIT PROCESS

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

Post-Flood Assessment

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

ADDENDUM TO THE DRAFT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE OTAY TARPLANT

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

TITLE 5 FAMILY LAW [RULE 5101 WHERE TO FILE DOCUMENTS

PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: Trans Bay Cable Maintenance Project

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this day of, 20, by RECITALS

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY


Northern Middlesex Council of Governments

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

DALEY RANCH CONSERVATION BANK CREDIT PURCHASE APPLICATION. CREDIT TYPE NUMBER LOCATION OF PROJECT Chaparral / Coastal Sage Scrub

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

Peters Canyon Channel (OCFCD Facility No. F06) from Confluence with San Diego Creek Channel (F05) to downstream Barranca Parkway

APPENDIX C LIST OF EA RECIPIENTS

The West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the United States

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION

1 INTRODUCTION. Kayenta Complex Page 9 December 2011 Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

Update on Ecosystem Services in the Federal Government. Kristin E. Skrabis Office of Policy Analysis U.S. Department of the Interior April 30, 2014

Southern California Avoid DUI Task Force Enforcement Operations Schedule

HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE

OWOW Proposition 84, Round 2 Master Project List

REGULATORY GUIDANCE LETTER

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Table of Contents. Introduction Guidance Permit fact sheet Completeness checklist. Introduction

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 27

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Most informed people realize that cumulative impacts have had

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Chapter 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 AUTHORITY FOR THE ELEMENT 6.3 KEY THEMES AND VISION FOR GENERAL PLAN

5. Environmental Analysis

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

Department of the Interior. Departmental Manual

Transcription:

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT Prospectus for Mitigation Bank and Application for Permit Riverpark Mitigation Bank Public Notice/Application No.: SPL-2015-00318-MBT Project: Riverpark Mitigation Bank Comment Period May 12, 2015 through June 11, 2015 Project Manager: Melanie Tymes, Melanie.B.Tymes@usace.army.mil, 760-602-4841 Applicant David Arnold Hillcrest Homes, Inc. 355 W. 2 nd Street Tustin, California 92780 Contact Barry Jones RC Habitats, LLC 9908 Prairie Dunes Way Sacramento, California 95892 Location The Riverpark Mitigation Bank is a proposed 619-acre mitigation bank located along the San Jacinto River (SJR) in western Riverside County (Figures 1 and 2). The Bank property is specifically located just downstream of the Ramona Expressway and immediately upstream of Nuevo Road. The site is depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Perris and Romoland Quadrangle Rancho San Jacinto Nuevo y Potrero Land Grant (Figure 3) in unincorporated Riverside County, California (33 49' 8.4"N, -117 9' 18"W). Activity The review of a mitigation bank prospectus from Hillcrest Homes, Inc. (proposed mitigation bank sponsor) associated with the development of the Riverpark Mitigation Bank for compensatory mitigation for Department of the Army (DA) permits. For more information see page 2 of this notice.

Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for the activity described herein and shown on the attached drawing(s). We invite you to review today s public notice and provide views on the proposed work. By providing substantive, sitespecific comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Regulatory Division, you provide information that support the Corps decision-making process. All comments received during the comment period become part of the record and will be considered in the decision. This permit will be issued, issued with special conditions, or denied under section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. Comments should be mailed to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division, Carlsbad Field Office ATTN: SPL-2015-00318-MBT 5900 La Place Court, Suite 100 Carlsbad, California 92008 Alternatively, comments can be sent electronically to: Melanie.b.tymes@usace.army.mil The mission of the Corps Regulatory Program is to protect the Nation's aquatic resources, while allowing reasonable development through fair, flexible and balanced permit decisions. The Corps evaluates permit applications for essentially all construction activities that occur in the Nation's waters, including wetlands. The Regulatory Program in the Los Angeles District is executed to protect aquatic resources by developing and implementing short- and long-term initiatives to improve regulatory products, processes, program transparency, and customer feedback considering current staffing levels and historical funding trends. Corps permits are necessary for any work, including construction and dredging, in the Nation's navigable water and their tributary waters. The Corps balances the reasonably foreseeable benefits and detriments of proposed projects, and makes permit decisions that recognize the essential values of the Nation's aquatic ecosystems to the general public, as well as the property rights of private citizens who want to use their land. The Corps strives to make its permit decisions in a timely manner that minimizes impacts to the regulated public. During the permit process, the Corps considers the views of other Federal, state and local agencies, interest groups, and the general public. The results of this careful public interest review are fair and equitable decisions that allow reasonable use of private property, infrastructure development, and growth of the economy, while offsetting the authorized impacts to the waters of the United States. The permit review process serves to first avoid and then minimize adverse effects of projects on aquatic resources to the maximum practicable extent. Any remaining unavoidable adverse impacts to the aquatic environment are offset by compensatory mitigation requirements, which may include restoration, enhancement, establishment, and/or preservation of aquatic ecosystem system functions and services. Evaluation Factors The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect 2

the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Factors that will be considered include conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. In addition, if the proposal would discharge dredged or fill material, the evaluation of the activity will include application of the EPA Guidelines (40 CFR Part 230) as required by Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. In addition, all comments will be distributed to the members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT) and the sponsor within 15 days of the close of the comment period. The DE and the IRT members will also have the opportunity to comment to the sponsor. After considering comments from the DE, the IRT and the public, if Hillcrest Homes, Inc. chooses to proceed with establishment of the mitigation bank, Hillcrest Homes, Inc. will prepare a draft instrument and submit it to the DE. Background On April 10, 2008, the Corps and the EPA published the Final Rule on Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources (ʺMitigation Ruleʺ), which went into effect June 9, 2008. The rule replaced previous guidance concerning compensatory mitigation. Consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Rule at 33 CFR 332.8(d), Hillcrest Homes, Inc. has submitted a prospectus to the Corps for the purpose of establishing and managing a mitigation bank consistent with the Mitigation Rule. The Corps seeks comments from interested parties on the prospectus. This public notice provides a summary of the mitigation bank prospectus submitted by Hillcrest Homes, Inc. The full prospectus may be obtained from the Corps by contacting Melanie Tymes at Melanie.b.tymes@usace.army.mil or 760-602-4841, or by clicking the Cyber Repository link at the top of the following website: https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits_apex/f?p=107:10:26521504204890::no::p10_bank_id:3460 Objectives The primary objective of the proposed mitigation bank would be to replace functions and services of aquatic resources and associated habitats that have been degraded or destroyed as a result 3

of activities conducted in compliance or in violation of Section 404 of the CWA. The proposed mitigation bank would provide mitigation for both permanent and temporary impacts to waters of the U.S. In addition, the proposed mitigation bank may be used to offset environmental losses resulting from unavoidable impacts related to regulated activities by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the San Diego and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Boards. Specific objectives include: Restoration of fluvial processes on site within the San Jacinto River floodplain. Restoration of alkali playa and vernal pool habitat. Expansion of existing sensitive plant populations across the site. Removal of ongoing agricultural activities on the site. Removal of existing berms and the low flow channel. Permanent protection of the site through transfer of fee title to the Western Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). Permanent management of the site through funding of a non-wasting endowment. Service Area Hillcrest Homes, Inc. proposes to include portions of the Santa Ana River watershed in the central and northern portions of western Riverside County, and southern San Bernardino County as the primary service area, and the remainder of the Santa Ana River watershed and Santa Margarita River watershed as the secondary service area. The Santa Ana drainage in the primary service area has an 8-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) of:. 18070202 San Jacinto 1807020201 Upper San Jacinto River 1807020202 Middle San Jacinto River 1807020203 Lower San Jacinto River 18070203 Santa Ana 1807020304 San Timoteo Wash 1807020306 Temescal Wash 1807020308 Middle Santa Ana River The secondary service areas include: 18070302 Santa Margarita River 1807030201 Upper Temecula Creek 1807030202 Wilson Creek 1807030203 Lower Temecula Creek 1807030204 Murrieta Creek 1807030205 Santa Margarita River 18070203 Santa Ana 4

1807020301 Bear Creek 1807020302 Headwaters Santa Ana River 1807020303 Lytle Creek 1807020305 Upper Santa Ana River 1807020307 Chino Creek 1807020309 Santiago Creek 1807020310 Lower Santa Ana River 18070201 Seal Beach 1807020100 Bolsa Chica Channel-Frontal Hunin 18070204 Newport Bay 1807020401 San Diego Creek 1807020402 Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean 18070106 San Gabriel 1807010606 Lower San Gabriel River Establishment and Operation of the Program Hillcrest Homes, Inc. currently has the property under contract to purchase a majority of the bank property from Sweeney Six Trust, a California Trust and The Frank Lauda Jr. Trust of 2000, and is in discussions with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on the purchase of the river channel. Based on preliminary information developed for the prospectus, the proposed mitigation bank would encompass approximately 619 acres of land almost entirely within the 100-year floodplain. Entitlement of the proposed mitigation bank is anticipated to result in the rehabilitation and re-establishment of approximately 554 acres of vernal pool and alkali playa, and 65 acres of upland buffer habitat, providing compensatory mitigation to offset lost aquatic resource functions and services. Due to its location along the San Jacinto River and its high potential for successful restoration upon elimination of the artificial low flow channel and berms created by historic agricultural activities, the proposed mitigation bank location has been identified by several state and Federal agencies as a high-priority restoration site. Hillcrest Homes, Inc. is seeking to preserve the proposed mitigation bank site in perpetuity through the transfer of fee title to the Western Riverside Regional Conservation Authority. Hillcrest Homes, Inc. would be responsible for the mitigation bank design, entitlement, and construction, and the RCA would be responsible for management. Hillcrest Homes, Inc. proposes that the San Diego Foundation hold the long-term management endowment. Qualifications of the Sponsor Hillcrest Homes, Inc. is a long established company with extensive experience in the development industry in southern California. Hillcrest Homes, Inc. has retained Barry Jones and Mike McCollum (RC Habitats, LLC), as joint venture partners in the bank, to be primarily responsible for day to day operation of the Bank. Mr. Jones and Mr. McCollum have been involved in several 5

conservation and mitigation banks across southern and central California. Hillcrest Homes, Inc. has also retained hydrologists, biologists, and restoration ecologists to assist with the Bank design, and will add technical expertise to the team as necessary during the BEI review process. For additional information please contact Melanie Tymes of my staff at 760-602-4841 or via e- mail at Melanie.b.tymes@usace.army.mil. This public notice is issued by the Chief, Regulatory Division. Regulatory Program Goals: To provide strong protection of the nation's aquatic environment, including wetlands. To ensure the Corps provides the regulated public with fair and reasonable decisions. To enhance the efficiency of the Corps administration of its regulatory program. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 5900 La Place Court, Suite 100 Carlsbad, California 92008 WWW.SPL.USACE.ARMY.MIL 6

?q Riverside SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY Corona!"a$ Norco A»!"a$ Mathews Elsinore A %&h( Project Site Moreno Valley Perris Perris! A?q Aª San Jacinto Aª Hemet Banning Beaumont AÀ!"`$?u Desert Hot Springs Palm Springs AÌ Palm Desert Coachella I:\PROJECTS\H\HLH\HLH-06_Riverpark\Map\PN\Fig1_Regional.mxd HLH-06 01/23/15 -CL ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY Elsinore!"a$ Murrieta %&h( Aª Temecula Diamond Valley Skinner Vail!"a$ Aª AÚ Hemet A RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY Cahuilla A A³ Aw A³ AÌ Salton Sea Regional Location RIVERPARK MITIGATION BANK N 0 10 Miles Figure 1

Davis Road Perris R am o na p Ex ss re w ay Riverpark Mitigation Bank Boundary Nuevo Road Dunlap Drive I:\PROJECTS\H\HLH\HLH-06_Riverpark\Map\PN\Fig2_AerialVicinity.mxd HLH-06 1/23/15 -CL Riverpark Property Boundary San Jacinto Avenue ( h & % Riverpark Property Boundary Riverpark Mitigation Bank Boundary Project Vicinity - Aerial Photograph RIVERPARK MITIGATION BANK N 0 4,000 Feet Figure 2

I:\PROJECTS\H\HLH\HLH-06_Riverpark\Map\PN\Fig3_USGS.mxd HLH-06 1/23/15 -CL Riverpark Property Boundary Riverpark Mitigation Bank Boundary Riverpark Property Boundary Riverpark Mitigation Bank Boundary USGS Topography RIVERPARK MITIGATION BANK N 0 2,000 Feet Figure 3