REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED

Similar documents
Selected Radio Frequency Exposure Limits

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Testing Report Twenty-Five Schools, Peel District School Board

UNDERSTANDING RADIO FREQUENCY AND BC HYDRO S SMART METERS

Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands)

SmartDiagnostics Application Note Wireless Interference

EN v1.2.1 TEST REPORT FOR ag/Draft n WLAN PCI-E Mini Card MODEL NUMBER: BCM94322MC REPORT NUMBER: 07U

HERMES: Human Exposure and Radiation Monitoring of Electromagnetic Sources.

Mobile Phone Base-Station Audit

Understanding Range for RF Devices

Measurements of radiofrequency fields from a WEL Networks Smart Meter

Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module

OpenWay Radio Frequency FAQ

SITE RADIATION SURVEY

RF Safety Compliance and Duty Cycle for OpenWay CENTRON 4G-LTE Meters December 2015

Human Exposure Limits

Automated Meter Reading Frequently Asked Questions. What is AMR?

Analysis of Immunity by RF Wireless Communication Signals

IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Standards (Active & Archive) Collection: VuSpec

FCC PART 15B CLASS A MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT

Millennium Product Inc. Model: Cell Shield / Zorb

RF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS

General Survey of Radio Frequency Bands 30 MHz to 3 GHz

RF Measurements Using a Modular Digitizer

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

Report Of. Shielding Effectiveness Test For. SafeSleeve Radiation Shielding Technology. Test Date(s): June 07 June 09, 2015

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

RADIO!FREQUENCY!EXPOSURE!REPORT!

GSM Base Station Radiation Level: A Case Study of University of Nigeria Environment

FCC PART 15 SUBPART C EMI MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT

Application Note AN-00126

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

GSM frequency planning

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF RF EME LEVELS FROM MOBILE TELEPHONE BASE STATIONS LOCATED AT LEICHHARDT, NSW

The Salzburg Model: A Precautionary Strategy for Siting of Base Stations

AN Application Note: FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz. FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz

is the power reference: Specifically, power in db is represented by the following equation, where P0 P db = 10 log 10

Application Note Receiving HF Signals with a USRP Device Ettus Research

MEMORANDUM. Amy Kahler, Director of Customer Service and Marketing Mike McCurnin, P.E., Director of Water Production

Design and Certification of ASH Radio Systems for Japan

Smart meters: Compliance with radio frequency exposure standards

RF safety at base station sites

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Application Note AN-00125

Product Safety and RF Exposure for Mobile Two-Way Radios Installed in Vehicles or as Fixed Site Control Stations

ADSP Sensor Survey For RTLS Calibration How-To Guide

Nigerian Communications Commission

Case Study Competition Be an engineer of the future! Innovating cars using the latest instrumentation!

Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) and the 5GHz Unlicensed Band

EMC STANDARDS STANDARDS AND STANDARD MAKING BODIES. International. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

ETSI EN V1.2.1 ( )

Measuring electric and magnetic fields

LVDS Technology Solves Typical EMI Problems Associated with Cell Phone Cameras and Displays

Spectrum and Power Measurements Using the E6474A Wireless Network Optimization Platform

HD Radio FM Transmission System Specifications Rev. F August 24, 2011

Mobile use, radio signals and health

AN003. Evaluation of Anechoic Chambers For EMC Measurements Using A CNE. Overview. CNE III 9kHz to 2GHz Conducted and radiated output

RF Communication System. EE 172 Systems Group Presentation

communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

ETSI EN V1.2.2 ( )

NI USB-5681 RF Power Meter Specifications

II. Radio equipment which transmits only under the control of electronic communications networks

Agilent N8973A, N8974A, N8975A NFA Series Noise Figure Analyzers. Data Sheet

This Antenna Basics reference guide includes basic information about antenna types, how antennas work, gain, and some installation examples.

Continuous, remote monitoring and logging of electromagnetic fields

Field Calibration Software

Electromagnetic Field Safety

802.11ac Power Measurement and Timing Analysis

Assessment of Radio Frequency / Microwave Radiation Emissions from Smart Meters in Toronto

Distance-To-Fault (DTF) Measurement in 75 Ohm Systems with the R&S FSH3-TV

RF Exposure and Modular Equipment. Considerations

Unmatched RF Spectrum Analysis

Agilent AN 1316 Optimizing Spectrum Analyzer Amplitude Accuracy

SERVICES BROCHURE info@t-r-s.com.au PO BOX 680, Claremont, 6910, Western Australia

The field strength measurement and SAR experience related to human exposure in 110 MHz to 40 GHz

Evaluating Cell Phone and Personal Communications Equipment and their EMC Effects on Automotive Audio and In-Cabin Modules

Cellular Antenna Proposal Form

ARIB TR-T V Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations in different regions

Making Spectrum Measurements with Rohde & Schwarz Network Analyzers

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZER

Characteristics of terrestrial IMT-Advanced systems for frequency sharing/ interference analyses

Tektronix RSA306 USB Spectrum Analyzer

Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation

UNDERSTANDING THE FCC REGULATIONS FOR LOW-POWER, NON-LICENSED TRANSMITTERS

IEC TC106. Standards for the Assessment of Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 to 300 GHz

CE Test Report. : Microchip Technology Inc West Chandler Blvd., Chandler, Arizona , USA

Electromagnetic Compatibility and International Regulatory Approvals

TCB Workshop. Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure Devices (U-NII)/Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS)

1. The Slotted Line. ECE 584 Microwave Engineering Laboratory Experiments. Introduction:

WIRELESS INSTRUMENTATION TECHNOLOGY

Agilent 8753ET/8753ES Network Analyzers

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Report Test results of Floww equipment

Current Probes. User Manual

Regulatory requirements - USA

Transcription:

REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED A Initial Report May 17, 2013 KAR B Issued report to correct typographical errors. May 31, 2013 KAR C Incorporation of University of Regina Comments September 9, 2013 KAR DRAWN CHECKED SMR Planetworks Consulting Corporation North Vancouver, BC, Canada SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter Safety Code 6 Report Prepared for SaskPower THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED WHEN STAMP IS VISIBLE. REFER TO THE ELECTRONIC VERSION FOR SIGNATURE AND DOCUMENT VERIFICATION. Measured By: Brad MacKenzie EIT Prepared by: Karl Reardon, P.Eng. Tel: 604 808 4980 Email: kreardon@planetworks.ca Report date: September 9, 2013 SIZE DWG. NO. STC_AMI_LAB REV C SCALE: None PAGE 1 OF 15

1 SUMMARY... 5 1.1 SITE LOCATION/ DETAILS... 5 1.2 ATTESTATION... 5 1.3 SAFETY CODE 6 DEFINITIONS... 6 1.4 REVIEW OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIONS... 8 1.4.1 Meter Inventories... 8 1.4.2 Findings... 8 1.4.3 Next Steps and Required Remedial Actions... 9 2 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE... 10 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE USED... 10 2.2 TEST EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION... 10 3 NBM 550 CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE... 11 4 EC5091 CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE... 11 5 TRAFFIC GENERATION... 12 6 FIELD PROBE LOG FILES... 12 7 SPECTRUM ANALYZER PLOTS... 13 SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 2 of 16 MAY 2013

Executive Summary Objective Approach Findings To certify the compliance of SaskPower s Smart electric (utilizing Sensus FlexNet Advanced Metering Infrastructure) against Canadian federal regulations as specified by Health Canada Safety Code 6. This report describes the test results for a single electrical meter. Planetworks, a telecommunication engineering consulting firm, has been contracted to conduct independent testing of SaskPower s Smart Meters. Planetworks uses a Narda Broadband Field Meter (NDM 550) with a shaped isotropic field probe, which is the most accurate field meter solution available for broadband radiofrequency (RF) exposure limit measurements. The testing environment has been constructed to be as realistic a representation of usage environment as possible. Although care was taken to ensure no other strong emitters of RF energy were present in the testing environment, it was not possible to eliminate the secondary sources of RF energy such as fluorescent lighting, electrical transformers, external Wi Fi hotspots, signals from cellular sites, broadcast sources, etc. Therefore, some level of background RF energy is included in all the measurement results. All testing has been conducted in conformance to procedures defined in Health Canada s Safety Code 6. At the operational frequencies of the Smart Meters, Safety Code 6 defines a maximum permissible power density of 6 W/m 2 (averaged over a 6 minute period) for uncontrolled areas (i.e. public areas). Using the relationship that 1 W/m 2 equals 100 W/cm 2, the Safety Code 6 permissible limit for 900 MHz emissions can be converted to 600 W/cm 2. All measurements were conducted over a 36 minute period which is sufficient to ensure that sufficient samples are obtained from the single Sensus meter. This timeframe exceeds Health Canada s requirement for a single 6 minute sample and permits 6 such 6 minute averages to be obtained and compared. 1. All test configurations resulted in measurements which are below the Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments). 2. With the Sensus meter disabled a background level of between 0.02% and 0.085% of Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments) was measured. 3. At 20 centimeter distance from the meter, the maximum average power density measured over a 36 minute period is 0.32% of Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments). These tests were conducted using an absolute worst case transmission rate of 1 transmission per second. These measured values include the background radio frequency signals originating from other internal or external sources. 4. While maintaining the 20 centimeter distance to the meter, but decreasing transmission rates to 6 transmissions per minute and 1 transmission per minute maximum average power density of between 0.077% and 0.094% of Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments) were recorded for both rates. It is noted that these measurements are statistically indistinguishable from the background RF signal levels from other sources. 5. At 100 centimeter distance from the meter, the maximum average power density measured over a 36 minute period is 0.091% of Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments). These tests were conducted using an absolute worst case transmission rate of 1 SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 3 of 16 MAY 2013

transmission per second. These measured values include the background radio frequency signals originating from other internal or external sources. It is noted that these measurements are indistinguishable from the background RF signal levels from other sources. 6. While maintaining the 100 centimeter distance to the meter, but decreasing transmission rates to 6 transmissions per minute and 1 transmission per minute maximum average power density of between 0.036% and 0.091% of Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit for public areas (uncontrolled environments) were recorded for both rates. It is noted that these measurements are indistinguishable from the background RF signal levels from other sources. 7. Measurements were not recorded for distances of 300 centimeters, since at this distance the measured values for all test cases were indistinguishable from background levels. Spectrum analyzer tests shown that the Sensus meter signal levels are less that FM broadcast signal levels and other ambient signals. 8. The Narda Field Meter measures the cumulative emissions across a very wide frequency range and automatically applies measurements against the Health Canada Safety Code 6 limit appropriate for each frequency. While this approach provides a very accurate assessment of the percentage of Safety Code 6 limit attained, it is not possible to accurately convert this value into a power density due to the presence of background RF sources. However, if it is assumed that all measured emissions originated from the Smart Meter, during the test conducted at 20 centimeters distance, the minimum and maximum average measurements (0.32%) can be converted to a power density of 1.92 W/cm 2. 9. All of the above measurement results continue to remain below Safety Code 6 limits when a measurement uncertainty factor of 2.65 is applied to account for worst case signal reflections. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 4 of 16 MAY 2013

1 Summary 1.1 Site Location/ Details Site Street Address Location of Antennas Not applicable A single Sensus electrical meters was tested in an office environment. Test Start April 18, 2013 Test Stop April 19, 2013 Site Plan Attch. n/a Antenna Photos Attch. n/a Site Photo Attch n/a Log Files Attch. Yes 1.2 Attestation I, Karl Reardon, a Professional Engineer registered in the Province of Saskatchewan, certify that, at the time of testing, the radio frequency field levels from a single Sensus Smart Meters complies with Health Canada regulations based on the specified documentation below: (HC Pub. 091029) Limits of Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Energy in the Frequency Range from 3 khz to300 GHz Safety Code 6 (2009) (HC Pub. 091031) Technical Guide for Interpretation and Compliance Assessment of Health Canada's Radio frequency Exposure Guidelines Measured Results Below Health Canada Safety Code 6 Exposure Limits for Uncontrolled Environments (General Public, not trained in radio frequency hazards, exposed to RF and Microwave emissions) Induced Currents are below HC SC 6 Requirements Signage Meets HC SC 6 Requirements Access to test location was controlled and logged Note: Lab Test Access restrictions not applicable Within Safe Limits Defined by Health Canada Yes N/A N/A Notes (1) The Sensus Smart Meter products being tested contain both a FlexNet radio as well as a Zigbee radio. Both radios are configured to transmit at the same frequency and both radios were enabled during testing. Due to the test setup, no transmissions would have been made from the Zigbee radio. This setup best represents the typical operation of the Smart Meter products. (2) The Narda probe was placed to ensure the path between the Sensus meter s antennas and the Narda Probe was un obstructed. This placement ensured maximum readings from the meter under test. (3) The Narda meter records cumulative RF emissions from all RF sources in the spectral range from 0.3 MHz to 50,000 MHz. Care was taken to ensure no significant RF sources were active in the room during the test. It should be noted that buildings typically contain many secondary RF sources such as fluorescent lighting, electrical transformers, motors, etc. Additionally, most populated areas contain many external RF sources that cannot be controlled, including Wi Fi hotspots, signals from cellular sites and devices, two way radio communication and broadcast sources. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 5 of 16 MAY 2013

1.3 Safety Code 6 Definitions Prior to the 2009 dated release of the Health Canada Safety Code 6 specifications, the documentation defined exposure limits for "RF and occupationally exposed workers" and exposure limits for the "general public." The general public was defined as any individual who may be exposed to RF emissions and has no knowledge or training in radio technology. Consequently exposure limits for the general public are five times lower than that for the RF worker who must have adequate safety training to work with antenna systems. Challenges arose when defining "occupationally exposed workers." In the 2009 edition of the Safety Code 6 guidelines, Health Canada attempted to address the ambiguities in these definitions by categorizing sites as "controlled" and "uncontrolled" where "uncontrolled" replaced the definition for the general public. The following text is lifted from current Health Canada s Safety Code 6 documentation and defines controlled versus uncontrolled environments. Controlled and Uncontrolled Environments For the purpose of this code, controlled environments are defined as those where all of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The RF field intensities in the controlled area have been adequately characterized by means of measurements, calculations or modeling (such as with the use of FDTD [finite difference time domain] software), (b) The exposure is incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for RF exposure and are cognizant of the intensity of the RF energy in their environment and, (c) The exposure is incurred by persons who are aware of the potential health risks associated with RF energy exposures and whom can control their risk using mitigation strategies. All situations that do not meet the specifications above are considered to be uncontrolled environments. Uncontrolled environments are defined as areas where either insufficient assessment of RF energy has been conducted or where persons who are allowed access to these areas have not received proper RF awareness training and have no means to assess or, if required, mitigate their exposure to RF energy. 1 1 Chapter 2, Maximum Exposure Limits, Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Energy in the Frequency Range from 3 khz to 300 GHz, HC Pub.: 091029 SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 6 of 16 MAY 2013

Exposure limits for controlled and uncontrolled environments is defined by Health Canada in the following tables. Applying the exposure limits from these standards to SaskPower s Smart Meters which use a radio operating near 900 MHz the limits are: Uncontrolled Environments 6 Watts/meter squared (W/m 2 ) or 600 microwatts per square centimeter ( W/cm 2 ) Controlled Environments 30 W/m 2 or 3,000 W/cm 2 SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 7 of 16 MAY 2013

Conversion between W/m 2 and W/cm 2 is performed using the relationship that 1 W/m 2 equals 100 W/cm 2. 1.4 Review of Findings, Conclusions and Remedial Actions Planetworks conducted testing to Health Canada Safety Code 6 for a single Smart Meters. 1.4.1 Meter Inventories A single electrical meter was present in the test area. A meter inventory is seen below. Meter Type Subclass FlexNet Model FlexNet ID Serial Number Electrical 200A 240V 1Phase 3Wire 530X 49803700 1N6031843946 1.4.2 Findings Testing showed that even in close proximity (20 centimeter) to a single Smart Meter, RF emissions from the meter is less than the limits imposed by Health Canada for the general public in uncontrolled environments. In summary, the following can be derived from the test data collected. In the table below it should be noted that a number of the test conditions result in measurements which are below 0.1% of the Uncontrolled Standard. At these very low levels the measurements are significantly impacted by external background signals, minor differences between measurement times, Narda meter uncertainty, and Narda meter noise floor. These factors result in what appears to be measurement anomalies, but are in fact expected variations based on tolerances for measurements taken with such low levels. Measured Percentage of Safety Code 6 Uncontrolled Limit Distance 60 Transmissions / Minute 6 Transmissions / Minute 1 Transmissions / Minute 20 cm 0.32% 0.08% 0.09% 100 cm 0.09% 0.09% 0.04% 1.4.3 Measurement Uncertainty At this time, the Narda unit represents the most accurate broadband, cumulative field metering solution available for RF exposure limit measurements in operational environments. The average emissions measured are below a field strength of 4.340 V/m, which is the lower limit rating of the Narda unit. At measurements below this level, the accuracy of the results may not be within the tolerance specified in the meter calibration certificate (Section 6) and the results obtained may also include internal noise generated by the Narda meter. It is therefore likely that the emissions from the Sensus Smart Meters are actually lower than those measured in this report. Changes in operational and test environment may cause a change in RF fields as a result of reflections. In the majority of environment these reflections are time varying and a therefore represented in the averages levels measured. In the event that these reflections are not time varying and the meter was placed at a minima, a factor of 2.56 would be applied. Applying the measurement uncertainty factor of 2.65 results in a maximum of 0.82% for the 20cm / 60 trans/minute case. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 8 of 16 MAY 2013

1.4.4 Next Steps and Required Remedial Actions No remedial actions are required. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 9 of 16 MAY 2013

2 Measurement Procedure 2.1 Description of Procedure Used Measurements used to determine conformity with the limits specified by Safety Code 6 are performed with the field sensor (probe) placed approximately twenty centimetres away from any object or person with measurements averaged over six minutes as per SC 6. The Narda SC 6 test meter was allowed to log measurements undisrupted for the duration of the test. 2.2 Test Equipment Description Meter Narda NBM 550 Serial #: B 0670 Calibration due: 2013 04 21 Probe Narda EC5091 Serial #: 01009 Calibration due: 2013 04 25 The following list of parameters was downloaded from the meter and was used as the basis of the testing: Device Product Name NBM 550 Device Serial Number B 0670 Device Cal Due Date 4/21/2013 Probe Product Name EC5091 Probe Serial Number 01009 Probe Cal Due Date 4/25/2013 Probe Field Type E Probe Connection Type C Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 khz Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 khz Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m Shaped Probe YES Standard ID 5 Standard Name Canada,occ Apply Standard ON Frequency 2.45 GHz Apply Correction Frequency OFF Eref_E(f) 137.0 V/m Eref_H(f) 137.2 V/m Combi Probe Use E Unit V/m SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 10 of 16 MAY 2013

Results Format FIXED 3 NBM 550 Calibration Certificate 4 EC5091 Calibration Certificate SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 11 of 16 MAY 2013

5 Traffic Generation Transmissions from the Sensus electric meter were controlled and managed through the use of a Sensus USB Micro Transceiver managed through the use of the Sensus FlexNet Utility v3.7.0.9 beta. The USB Micro transceiver was located a sufficient distance from the test arrangement so as not to impact field strength measurements performed by the Narda meter. Traffic generation was initiated by transmitting pings to the meter at specified intervals of either 1 second, 10 seconds or 60 seconds. On receipt of the ping the electric meter transmits a 0.025 s long response. Receipt of responses were verified via the FlexNet Utiliy screen and log files. Cumulative meter transmission time for each of the 36 minute tests was as follows: 1 Second Interval Test: 54 seconds total transmission time 10 Second Interval Test: 5.4 seconds total transmission time 60 second Interval Test: 0.9 seconds total transmission time. 6 Field Probe Log Files The following table presents the average E Field as a percentage of Health Canada s Safety Code 6 limit for uncontrolled environments. All measurements are average over a 6 minute exposure time. Measurements are shown for: Background: No meter transmitting 20 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 1 second 20 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 10 seconds 20 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 60 seconds 100 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 1 second 100 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 10 seconds 100 cm Probe Distance with a Transmission Interval of 60 seconds 6 Minute Sample # Average (E Field) [% STD] Background 20cm 1s 20cm 10s 20 cm 60s 100 cm 1s 100cm 10s 100cm 60s 1 0.056 0.318 0.077 0.095 0.042 0.073 0.011 2 0.085 0.227 0.047 0.049 0.090 0.088 0.015 3 0.055 0.167 0.062 0.076 0.091 0.041 0.024 4 0.019 0.129 0.031 0.077 0.058 0.047 0.017 5 0.025 0.129 0.011 0.055 0.075 0.034 0.013 6 0.083 0.098 0.055 0.084 0.058 0.032 0.036 SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 12 of 16 MAY 2013

7 Spectrum Analyzer Plots In addition to the above tests conducted with the Nada NBM550 meter and shaped probe, additional measurements were conducted using a Rohde and Schwarz FSH8 spectrum analyzer coupled to a Mobile Mark antenna, model number SMW-UMB-1HDHE2HF. This antenna has a gain on 2 dbi across the band 800MHz to 2700 MHz. Measurements were conducted at a distance of 20 cm, 100 cm, and 300 cm from a single electrical Sensus meter. Transmissions from the gas Sensus meter occurred too infrequently to capture on a spectrum analyzer and this meter was therefore not tested further.. It should be noted that all measurements using the spectrum analyzer show the maximum signal level, and that this signal is only present for a very small portion of the time. Analysis of the waveforms shows that a typical transmission has a duration of less than 0.025 s. 20 cm Measurement Distance SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 13 of 16 MAY 2013

The meter transmission is shown in the center of the screenshot as is identified by Marker 1 (M1). The other peaks captured by the spectrum analyzer are signals within the band which are being transmitted by external devices which are not part of the test configuration (i.e. background signals). At 20 cm this meter signal has a peak level of -20 dbm, or 0.01 Watts. The power of the signal, as measured across a 2 MHz bandwidth was -19.1 dbm, or 0.012 Watts. This measurement relates to an instantaneous power density level of 0.94 W/m 2. Again it is noted that this level is only present for 0.025 s during any transmission. The results from this test can be compared to the tests with the Narda meter. At a rate of 1 transmission per second the cumulative transmission time is 0.025 s every second. Using the peak, instantaneous power density of 0.94 W/m 2, and a cumulative transmission time of 0.025 s, results in an average power density of 0.024 W/m 2. This level equates to 0.39% of the Safety Code 6 limit for uncontrolled environments. It is noted that this is the within tolerances (~+/- 3 db) to the measurements performed with the Narda NBM550 meter and EC5091 shaped probe. 100 cm Measurement Distance SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 14 of 16 MAY 2013

The meter transmission is shown in the center of the screenshot as is identified by Marker 1 (M1). At 100 cm distance this signal has a peak level of -34.8 dbm, or 0.0003 Watts. The power of the signal, as measured across a 2 MHz bandwidth was -33.8 dbm, or 0.0004 Watts. This measurement relates to an instantaneous power density level of 0.03 W/m 2. Again it is noted that this level is only present for 0.025 s during any transmission. 300 cm Measurement Distance The meter transmission is shown in the center of the screenshot as is identified by Marker 1 (M1). At 300 cm distance this signal has a peak level of -42.6 dbm, or 0.00006 Watts. The power of the signal, as measured across a 2 MHz bandwidth was -41.6 dbm, or 0.00007 Watts. This measurement relates to an instantaneous power density level of 0.005 W/m 2. Again it is noted that this level is only present for 0.025 s during any transmission. Comparison with other Background Signals The following spectrum analyzer screen capture shows the Sensus meter signal (at 300 cm distance) as compared to other RF signals which may be present in typical customer environment. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 15 of 16 MAY 2013

The capture above shows an expanded frequency range, which the Sensus meter indicated by Marker 2 (M2). Broadcast FM transmitters, approximately 6.6 km distant from the indoor measurement location are shown by Marker 1 (M1), with a typical residential Wi-Fi signal shown by Marker 3 (M3). The Wi-Fi transmitter was approximately 450 cm from the measurement location. As can be seen the peak Sensus meter levels are 10 times lower than FM broadcast radios present inside a building 6.6 km distant from the FM broadcast site. The meter levels are approximately 5 times lower than those found near a standard residential Wi-Fi access point. SaskPower Sensus Electrical Meter 16 of 16 MAY 2013