Extending 2.4 GHz ZigBee Short Range Radio Performance with Skyworks Front-End Modules

Similar documents
is the power reference: Specifically, power in db is represented by the following equation, where P0 P db = 10 log 10

RF Communication System. EE 172 Systems Group Presentation

Understanding Range for RF Devices

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

Antennas & Propagation. CS 6710 Spring 2010 Rajmohan Rajaraman

ZigBee Propagation for Smart Metering Networks

communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

AN Application Note: FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz. FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz

COMMON REGULATORY OBJECTIVES FOR WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) EQUIPMENT PART 2 SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF WLAN EQUIPMENT

Bluetooth voice and data performance in DS WLAN environment

Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) vs. Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) in Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) and Wireless LAN (WLAN)

COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND RADIO MICROPHONES IN BANDS IV AND V

Antenna Deployment Technical Brief

ACRS 2.0 User Manual 1

SmartDiagnostics Application Note Wireless Interference

GSM frequency planning

1 Lecture Notes 1 Interference Limited System, Cellular. Systems Introduction, Power and Path Loss

ETSI EN V1.2.1 ( )

Tx/Rx A high-performance FM receiver for audio and digital applicatons

Design Note DN004. Folded Dipole Antenna for CC25xx By Audun Andersen. Keywords. 1 Introduction CC2500 CC2550 CC2510 CC2511

Antenna Properties and their impact on Wireless System Performance. Dr. Steven R. Best. Cushcraft Corporation 48 Perimeter Road Manchester, NH 03013

Wireless Communication and RF System Design Using MATLAB and Simulink Giorgia Zucchelli Technical Marketing RF & Mixed-Signal

Omni Antenna vs. Directional Antenna

The front end of the receiver performs the frequency translation, channel selection and amplification of the signal.

Experiment Measurements for Packet Reception Rate in Wireless Underground Sensor Networks

Dynamic Reconfiguration & Efficient Resource Allocation for Indoor Broadband Wireless Networks

This Antenna Basics reference guide includes basic information about antenna types, how antennas work, gain, and some installation examples.

IEEE Sub-1 GHz-Lösungen für Sensornetzwerke mit optimierter Funkabdeckung Dr. Wolf Wireless GmbH

Protocolo IEEE Sergio Scaglia SASE Agosto 2012

Application Note AN107

Features. Applications. Transmitter. Receiver. General Description MINIATURE MODULE. QM MODULATION OPTIMAL RANGE 1000m

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S (Questions ITU-R 48/4 and ITU-R 70/4)

Optimizing IP3 and ACPR Measurements

CE Test Report. : Microchip Technology Inc West Chandler Blvd., Chandler, Arizona , USA

Digital Modulation. David Tipper. Department of Information Science and Telecommunications University of Pittsburgh. Typical Communication System

An Introduction to Microwave Radio Link Design

SHARING BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL FLIGHT TELEPHONE SYSTEM (TFTS) AND RADIO ASTRONOMY IN THE 1.6 GHz BAND. Paris, May 1992

I. Wireless Channel Modeling

General Survey of Radio Frequency Bands 30 MHz to 3 GHz

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

What is ? Why are standards important?

CMOS 5GHz WLAN a/n/ac RFeIC WITH PA, LNA, AND SPDT

Introduction to RF Engineering. Andrew CLEGG

DT3: RF On/Off Remote Control Technology. Rodney Singleton Joe Larsen Luis Garcia Rafael Ocampo Mike Moulton Eric Hatch

COMPATIBILITY STUDY FOR UMTS OPERATING WITHIN THE GSM 900 AND GSM 1800 FREQUENCY BANDS

ETSI TR V1.3.1 ( )

Demystifying Wireless for Real-World Measurement Applications

ETSI EN V1.2.2 ( )

'Possibilities and Limitations in Software Defined Radio Design.

Maximizing Receiver Dynamic Range for Spectrum Monitoring

Agilent AN 1315 Optimizing RF and Microwave Spectrum Analyzer Dynamic Range. Application Note

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

Welcome. Rulon VanDyke RF System Architect, Agilent Technologies. David Leiss Senior RF Simulation Consultant, Agilent Technologies

In 3G/WCDMA mobile. IP2 and IP3 Nonlinearity Specifications for 3G/WCDMA Receivers 3G SPECIFICATIONS

Ultra Wideband Signal Impact on IEEE802.11b Network Performance

Spectrum and Power Measurements Using the E6474A Wireless Network Optimization Platform

APPLICATION NOTE. AT05558: Wireless Manufacturing Test Kit. Atmel ATmega256RFR2. Description. Features

USB 3.0* Radio Frequency Interference Impact on 2.4 GHz Wireless Devices

Application Note AN-00126

LoRa FAQs. 1 of 4 Semtech. Semtech Corporation LoRa FAQ

Tutorial on Basic Link Budget Analysis

How To Understand And Understand The Power Of A Cdma/Ds System

SECTION 2 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF BPL SYSTEMS

Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum PHY of the Wireless LAN Standard. Why Frequency Hopping?

XBEE PROTOCOL COMPARISON

Maximizing Range and Battery Life in Low-Cost Wireless Networks

802.11ac Power Measurement and Timing Analysis

UNDERSTANDING NOISE PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS (AN )

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

MSAN-001 X-Band Microwave Motion Sensor Module Application Note

Key Priorities for Sub-GHz Wireless Deployment

MANAGEMENT OF BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIERS IN THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 29.7 MHz TO 520 MHz

Application Note Receiving HF Signals with a USRP Device Ettus Research

Wharf T&T Limited Report of Wireless LAN Technology Trial Version: 1.0 Date: 26 Jan Wharf T&T Limited. Version: 1.0 Date: 26 January 2004

Demonstration of a Software Defined Radio Platform for dynamic spectrum allocation.

ZigBee Technology Overview

Pointers on using the 5GHz WiFi bands

Revision of Lecture Eighteen

RF System Design and Analysis Software Enhances RF Architectural Planning

Maximizing Throughput and Coverage for Wi Fi and Cellular

FURTHER READING: As a preview for further reading, the following reference has been provided from the pages of the book below:

Evaluation of Co-existence interference between CDMA 1900MHz & WCDMA 2100MHz

Avaya WLAN 9100 External Antennas for use with the WAO-9122 Access Point

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F (Question ITU-R 157/9) b) that systems using this mode of propagation are already in service for burst data transmission,

FREQUENCY ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE

Interpreting the Information Element C/I

II. Radio equipment which transmits only under the control of electronic communications networks

CE Test Report. : BL600 Series Bluetooth Low Energy Module

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM Measuring sideband emissions of T-DAB and DVB-T transmitters for monitoring purposes

IEEE ac in Service Provider Wi-Fi Deployments: Consider More Than Speed

FM Radio Transmitter & Receiver Modules

Radio Physics for Wireless Devices and Networking. The Radio Physics of WiFi. By Ron Vigneri

Create. Monitor. Reconfigure. Switching RF Over Fiber. Case Study. The Problem.

A survey on Spectrum Management in Cognitive Radio Networks

Implementation of Digital Signal Processing: Some Background on GFSK Modulation

Motion Sensing without Sensors: Information. Harvesting from Signal Strength Measurements

Transcription:

Extending 2.4 GHz ZigBee Short Range Radio Performance with Skyworks Front-End Modules Keywords: 2.4 GHz IEEE Std 802.15.4 TM -2003 Systems ZigBee Systems Receiver Sensitivity RF Indoor Propagation Wireless RF System Range Abstract: The SKY65336 and SKY65337 ZigBee front-end modules (FEMs) can greatly enhance the performance of a ZigBee radio solution when integrated with any ZigBee low power reference design. Both devices can transmit up to 100 times more power than a typical 0 dbm low power ZigBee radio transmitter and can reduce the level of unwanted spurious emissions to be compliant with the main regulatory standards without the use of external components such as filters. Ember s EM250 with Skyworks FEM reference design [1] shows a good example of the complete subsystem. The SKY65336 also integrates a low noise amplifier (LNA) that enhances the sensitivity of a ZigBee receiver by several db, a key factor that extends the receiver range. The SKY65336 can also be used to implement high data rate solutions that require high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). This note describes the benefits of using the SKY65336 and SKY65337 FEMs in ZigBee radio systems and details how the devices can contribute to tremendously extending the ZigBee wireless range and throughput.

1. Transmit Power Improvement The SKY65336 and SKY65337 FEMs incorporate a highly efficient power amplifier (PA) in the transmit path that can deliver up to +20 dbm at the antenna port (see Figure 1). Up to this high power level, both modules which also provide harmonic filters guarantee a level of harmonics lower than 44 dbm, which eliminates the need for additional filters in the transmit path to be compliant with regulatory standards (Table 1 summarizes the limits for each standard). This facilitates RF design efficiency, and reduces the bill of materials (BOM) count and cost as demonstrated in [1]. 25 SKY65336/65337 Output Power vs. Input Power 20 15 10 Pout(dB 5 0-5 -10-15 -30-25 -20-15 -10-5 0 5 10 Pin (db Figure 1 Output Power vs. Input Power Table 1: Conducted Spurious Emission Limits Effective Isotropically Standard Radiated Power (dbm/mhz) FCC 15.247-41.2 EN 300 328-30 ARIB STD-T66-26.02

2. Receiver Sensitivity Enhancement Sensitivity of a Receiver: The sensitivity of a receiver is the minimum level of the input signal that it is able to receive and decode successfully with a given error rate. This sensitivity depends on two main factors: The SNR at the receiver output that is necessary to ensure the target error rate. The SNR is a function of the energy per bit to the noise density ratio (Eb/No), the date rate (R), and the receive bandwidth (B): E R SNR = b Equation 1 N B 0 The noise figure (NF) of the system, which describes the ability of the system to process a small signal noise-free. The NF is calculated according to the following equation: Sin SNRin Nin NoiseFigur e = = Equation 2 SNR S out out Nout The minimum sensitivity (measured in db is calculated as: If Sensitivit y NoiseFigure + SNR out + N in = Equation 3 N in = 10.log( ktb) Where: k = Boltzman s Constant = 1.38 10 23 Joules/Kelvin T = absolute temperature = 298 K B = noise bandwidth Then And Sensitivity N in = 174 +10 log( B) dbm 174 + 10 log B + NoiseFigure + SNR ( db = Equation 4 out Where: SNRout = Minimum SNR that guarantees the target error rate.

The IEEE Std 802.15.4 TM -2003 [2] sets the requirements for the 85 dbm one percent packet error ratio (PER) minimum sensitivity. The 2.4 GHz receiver link uses offset quadrature phase-shift keying (O-QPSK) modulation with direct sequence spreading spectrum (DSSS) techniques. The main benefit of DSSS systems is to provide substantial immunity to narrow band interference because the signal energy is spread over a wide bandwidth. Beyond the IEEE Std 802.15.4 TM -2003, using different spreading factors (e.g., 8, 4, 2, or 1) can also provide an efficient way to achieve a multi-user configurable data rate system. Figure 2 shows an example of PER (20 octets) curves for a O-QPSK signal for different data rates. The spreading gain is demonstrated in this Figure by showing that the highest spread signal (250 kbit/sec data rate with a spreading factor of 8 as used in ZigBee syste for a given PER requires the smallest SNR. Figure 2: PER curves for O-QPSK Modulation vs. SNR and Data Rate Various ZigBee-compliant transceivers are available with reported sensitivities for 250 kbit/sec ranges from 97 to 101 dbm. For the same data rate, Ember in their Application Note 5059 [3] suggests that for an actual ZigBee receiver, the minimum SNR is 3 db and the receive bandwidth is 1.1MHz. Typical sensitivity data for the different data rates are calculated according to Equation 4 and summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Typical Receiver Sensitivity Performance Data Rate SNR(Note 1) (db) Sensitivity (db NF (db) 250kbits/s 3-99dBm 11.5 500kbits/s 6-96dBm 11.5 1000kbits/s 9-93dBm 11.5 2000kbits/s 12-90dBm 11.5 Note 1: SNR for higher data rates are calculated from SNR at 250kbits/s and spreading gain reduction Improving Sensitivity with the SKY65336 Equation 4 shows that reducing the system NF improves sensitivity. The cascaded NF of a complex system can be derived from the standalone block level NF and gain as follows (Friis Formula): NFi 1 NFTotal = NF1 + Equation 5 i Gi 1 The SKY65336 incorporates an LNA in its receive path along with the front-end transmit/receive switch and output RF balun. The device provides a NF of 2.5 db with a gain of 10.5 db. Assuming the ZigBee transceiver (without the off chip RF balun and harmonics filter) NF is 9.5 db, the cascaded NF is 4 db compared to the original value of 11.5 db. Table 3 summarizes the sensitivity of the receiver calculated using Equations 4 and 5. Note that for all data rates, the sensitivity improvement is greater than 7 db. Table 3: Sensitivity Comparison Table between Transceiver Standalone and with the SKY65336 FEM Data Rate Sensitivity No FEM Sensitivity with SKY65336 250kbits/s -99dBm -106.5dBm 500kbits/s -96dBm -103.5dBm 1000kbits/s -93dBm -100.5Bm 2000kbits/s -90dBm -97.5dBm

3. Range Extension with the SKY65336/337 RF Signal Propagation Attenuation Signal propagating from the source or transmitter to the receiver can be attenuated by several different factors: 1. Free space attenuation (the signal spreads in space). 2. Signal absorption or shadowing (the signal passes through solid objects like walls or floors). 3. Multipath fading (the signal reflects, refracts, or scatters). Free space attenuation can be calculated according to the following equation: L FreeSpace ( db) = (20 log d( + 20 log f ( MHz) 27.5) Equation 6 Where: L FreeSpace = Free space attenuation in db d = Distance in meters f = Frequency in MHz In the case of a ZigBee frequency of 2.45 GHz, Equation 6 becomes: L _ 2450MHz ( db) = (20 log d( + 40.3) FreeSpace Equation 7 Note that Annex E of ref[2] suggests a different free-space attenuation formula for 802.15.4-compliant systems: L d( ( db) = (33 log 8 _ 2450MHz + 58.5) FreeSpace Equation 8 Attenuation for signal absorption and multi-path fading are usually derived from Equation 7 with the addition of some empirical factors [4]: Where γ etc. L db) = (10 γ log d( + L (1m ) + L ) Equation 9 2450MHz ( FreeSpace _ 2450MHz Absoption L Absoption = the propagation loss exponent = Attenuation (in db) of the signal passing through walls, doors, floors

Examples of indoor wall absorption [5] indicate that γ equals 4 and L Absorption equals 10 db. Using these values, Equation 9 becomes: L ( db) = (40 log d( 2450 _ indoor + 50.3) MHz Equation 10 Comparing Equation 8 and 10 indicates that a ZigBee RF subsystem range is greatly reduced when operating indoors. For example, at 20 meters away from the source, the transmit signal is reduced by more than 100 db indoors compared to only 72 db for outdoor free space loss. Comparing ZigBee System Ranges The range of the RF system is defined as the maximum distance between the signal source or transmitter and the receiver. Range depends on three factors: 1. Effective transmit power 2. Propagation path loss 3. Minimum sensitivity of the receiver as defined in Equations 1 through 4 The effective transmit power is the power transmitted by the source in the direction of the receiver. Effective transmit power is derived from adding the transmit antenna gain (Gt) to the total transmit power (Pt). Similarly, receiver antenna gain (Gr) and receiver power (Pr) can be derived from the following equation: Pr Pt + Gr + Gt + L = Equation 11 Where: Pr Pt Gr Gt L = Receiver power in dbm = Transmitter power in dbm = Receiver antenna gain in db = Transmitter antenna gain in db =Attenuation at 2450 MHz in db Assuming the antenna gain are 0dB for the transmitter and the receiver, the receive power is then given by d( Pr = Pt ( 33log + 58.5) Equation 12 8 for free-space propagation conditions, and by: P = Pt ( 40 log10 d( + 50.3) for indoor propagation conditions. r Equation 13

Examples of receive power for two different systems are shown in Figure 3 for free-space propagation conditions. A similar example is shown in Figure 4 for indoor propagation conditions. In both cases, the range is derived from the intersection of the minimum sensitivity level, as calculated in Table 3, and the receive signal strength measured at the receiver input. Table 4 lists the range for a ZigBee transceiver and the improved ranges by adding the SKY65337 or SKY65336 FEM to the system. The optimum performance is achieved with the SKY65336 because of the improved sensitivity of the receiver. -70 Receive Signal Strength (outdoor example 802.15.4 annex E formula) Receive signal No PA Receive signal with SKY65336 Minimum sensitivity Transceiver only Minimum sensitivity with SKY65336-75 Receive Signal Strength (db -80-85 -90-95 -100-105 -110 1 10 100 1000 Distance from Transmitter ( Figure 3: Received Signal Strength at the Receiver Node versus Distance between Transmitter and Receiver for Low Power 0dBm and High Power 20dBm Transmitters (Free-Space Propagation Conditions)

Receive Signal Strength (db -70-75 -80-85 -90-95 -100-105 Receive Signal Strength (Indoor example) Receive signal No PA Receive signal with SKY65336 Minimum sensitivity Transceiver only Minimum sensitivity with SKY65336-110 1 10 100 Distance from Transmitter ( Figure 4: Received Signal Strength at the Receiver Node versus Distance between Transmitter and Receiver for Low Power 0dBm and High Power 20dBm Transmitters (Indoor Propagation Conditions) Table 4: Comparison of Wireless Ranges for Transceiver only and with the SKY65336/SKY65337 FEMs Free-Space Range ( Indoor Range ( System Transceiver only 133 16 Transceiver with the SKY65337 543 53 Transceiver with the SKY65336 923 81 4. Conclusion The SKY65336 and SKY65337 are easy to integrate, highly efficient ZigBee FEMs. Both devices provide a natural, low-cost solution to improve ZigBee wireless network performance whether extending coverage or increasing the available data rate. For further information, please refer to the SKY65336 and SKY65337 data sheets ([6], [7]) and Ember s EM250 reference hardware design [1].

References [1] Ember EM250 with Skyworks - Front End Module Reference Design. http://ember.com/zip/ref_des_sky65336_sky65337.zip [2] IEEE Std 802.15.4 TM -2003, Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). [3] Adjacent Channel Rejection Measurements for 802.15.4 radios. Ember Application Note 5059. 27 March 2009 [4] Christiano Monti, Antonio Saitto, and Damiano Valletta, Indoor Radio Channel Models for IEEE 802.15.4 Technology, Telespazio S.p.A Proceedings of EURASIP Workshop, RFID, 2008. [5] RF Propagation Basics White Paper, Sputnik, Inc., April 2004. [6] 200939D the SKY65336 datasheet [7] 200940D the SKY65337 datasheet