2 Creation and Annihilation Operators

Similar documents
Three Pictures of Quantum Mechanics. Thomas R. Shafer April 17, 2009

Time Ordered Perturbation Theory

Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N)

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

Contents. Goldstone Bosons in 3He-A Soft Modes Dynamics and Lie Algebra of Group G:

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model. Introduction/Aims

The career of a young theoretical physicist consists of treating the harmonic oscillator in ever-increasing levels of abstraction.

Continuous Groups, Lie Groups, and Lie Algebras

Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system.

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Direct Methods for Solving Linear Systems. Matrix Factorization

The Characteristic Polynomial

1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state

Arithmetic and Algebra of Matrices

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCES IN PHYSICS (MS PHYS) (LIST OF COURSES BY SEMESTER, THESIS OPTION)

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

Notes on Determinant

The Determinant: a Means to Calculate Volume

Operator methods in quantum mechanics

Gauge theories and the standard model of elementary particle physics

6. Cholesky factorization

Recall that two vectors in are perpendicular or orthogonal provided that their dot

Reflection Positivity of the Free Overlap Fermions

Vector and Matrix Norms

Math 312 Homework 1 Solutions

Feynman diagrams. 1 Aim of the game 2

Linear Algebra Notes

Solution of Linear Systems

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Pre-Calculus

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Notes on Quantum Mechanics

Concepts in Theoretical Physics

Systems of Linear Equations

Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory. Don Colladay. New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A.

RINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2013 Assignment 4

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set.

State of Stress at Point

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

PHYSICS TEST PRACTICE BOOK. Graduate Record Examinations. This practice book contains. Become familiar with. Visit GRE Online at

Quantum Mechanics: Postulates

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

Lecture 5 Rational functions and partial fraction expansion

Assessment Plan for Learning Outcomes for BA/BS in Physics

C 3 axis (z) y- axis

Review of Statistical Mechanics

ENTANGLEMENT EXCHANGE AND BOHMIAN MECHANICS

The Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited

Solving Systems of Linear Equations

SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS

SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY

The discovery that D-branes carry Ramond-Ramond (RR) charge[] and hence represent stable BPS saturated particles in string theory has dramatically cha

These axioms must hold for all vectors ū, v, and w in V and all scalars c and d.

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Figure 1.1 Vector A and Vector F

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

Linear Algebra: Determinants, Inverses, Rank

8.2. Solution by Inverse Matrix Method. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Let s first see how precession works in quantitative detail. The system is illustrated below: ...

Generalized Wannier States in Inhomogeneous Lattices

26. Determinants I. 1. Prehistory

5.3 The Cross Product in R 3

Section Inner Products and Norms

Orthogonal Bases and the QR Algorithm

Structure of the Root Spaces for Simple Lie Algebras

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

1 Homework 1. [p 0 q i+j p i 1 q j+1 ] + [p i q j ] + [p i+1 q j p i+j q 0 ]

3. Interpolation. Closing the Gaps of Discretization... Beyond Polynomials

Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions

Chemical group theory for quantum simulation

5. Orthogonal matrices

9 Multiplication of Vectors: The Scalar or Dot Product

Solving simultaneous equations using the inverse matrix

THE SIGN OF A PERMUTATION

Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix multiplication).

General Framework for an Iterative Solution of Ax b. Jacobi s Method

Seminar 4: CHARGED PARTICLE IN ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD. q j

Quantum Computing and Grover s Algorithm

CONTROLLABILITY. Chapter Reachable Set and Controllability. Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation

Solution to Homework 2

Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH

Matrix Representations of Linear Transformations and Changes of Coordinates

December 4, 2013 MATH 171 BASIC LINEAR ALGEBRA B. KITCHENS

Matrices and Polynomials

13 MATH FACTS a = The elements of a vector have a graphical interpretation, which is particularly easy to see in two or three dimensions.

Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Hans de Vries

FLAP P11.2 The quantum harmonic oscillator

Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality

Polynomial Degree and Lower Bounds in Quantum Complexity: Collision and Element Distinctness with Small Range

x1 x 2 x 3 y 1 y 2 y 3 x 1 y 2 x 2 y 1 0.

Transcription:

Physics 195 Course Notes Second Quantization 030304 F. Porter 1 Introduction This note is an introduction to the topic of second quantization, and hence to quantum field theory. In the Electromagnetic Interactions note, we have already been exposed to these ideas in our quantization of the electromagnetic field in terms of photons. We develop the concepts more generally here, for both bosons and fermions. One of the uses of this new formalism is that it provides a powerful structure for dealing with the symmetries of the states and operators for systems with many identical particles. 2 Creation and Annihilation Operators We begin with the idea that emerged in our quantization of the electromagnetic field, and introduce operators that add or remove particles from a system, similar to the changing of excitation quanta of a harmonic oscillator. To follow an explicit example, suppose that we have a potential well, (x), with single particle eigenstates φ 0 (x),φ 1 (x),... Suppose we have an n (identical) boson system, where all n bosons are in the lowest, φ 0, level. Denote this state by n. We assume that n is normalized: n n = 1. Since the particles are bosons, we can have n =0, 1, 2,...,where 0 is the state with no particles (referred to as the vacuum ). Now define annihilation (or destruction ) operators according to: b 0 n = n n 1 (1) b 0 n = n +1 n +1. (2) Note that these operators subtract or add a particle to the system, in the state φ 0. They have been defined so that their algebraic properties are identical to the raising/owering operators of the harmonic oscillator. For example, consider the commutator: [b 0,b 0] n = (b 0 b 0 b 0b 0 ) n (3) = [(n +1) (n)] n (4) = n. (5) 1

Thus [b 0,b 0] = 1. With these operators, we may write the n-particle state in terms of the vacuum state by: n = (b 0) n 0. (6) As in the case of the harmonic oscillator, b 0 is the hermitian conjugate of b 0. To see this, consider the following: We have b 0 n = n +1 n +1. Thus, n +1 b 0 n = n +1, (7) and hence, n +1 b 0 = n +1 n, or n b 0 = n n 1. (8) Likewise, b 0 acts as a creation operator when acting to the left: n b 0 = n +1 n +1. (9) We may write the n-particle state in terms of the vacuum state by: n = (b 0) n 0. (10) Finally, we have the number of particles operator: B 0 b 0b 0,with B 0 n = n n. (11) Now suppose that the particles are fermions, and define fermion annihilation and creation operators: f 0 1 = 0, f 0 0 = 0; (12) f 0 1 = 0, f 0 0 = 1. (13) In the 0, 1 basis, these operators are the 2 2 matrices: f 0 = ( ) 0 1, f 0 = 0 0 ( ) 0 0. (14) 1 0 With this explicit representation, we see that they are hermitian conjugate to each other. By construction, we cannot put two fermions in the same state with these operators. 2

The algebraic properties of the fermion operators are different from those of the boson operators. The commutator, in the 0, 1 basis, is ( ) [f 0,f 0]= 1 0 I. (15) 0 1 Consider the anticommutator: That is, {f 0,f 0} =1. Also, {f 0,f 0} 1 = (f 0 f 0 + f 0f 0 ) 1 = 1, (16) {f 0,f 0} 0 = 0 (17) {f 0,f 0 } = 0, (18) {f 0,f 0} = 0. (19) The number of particles operator is F 0 = f 0f 0. Now return to bosons, and consider two levels, φ 0 and φ 1.Let n 0,n 1 be the state with n 0 bosons in φ 0 and n 1 bosons in φ 1. As before, define, and also, b 0 n 0,n 1 = n 0 n 0 1,n 1 (20) b 0 n 0,n 1 = n 0 +1 n 0 +1,n 1, (21) b 1 n 0,n 1 = n 1 n 0,n 1 1 (22) b 1 n 0,n 1 = n 1 +1 n 0,n 1 +1. (23) In addition to the earlier commutation relations, we have that the annihilation and creation operators for different levels commute with each other: [b 0,b 1 ] = 0; [b 0,b 1 ] = 0 (24) [ b0,b 1] = 0; [b 0,b 1] = 0 (25) We can construct an arbitrary state from the vacuum by: n 0,n 1 = (b 0) n 0 n0! The total number operator is now (b 1) n 1 0, 0 (26) n1! B = B 0 + B 1 = b 0b 0 + b 1b 1, (27) 3

so that B n 0,n 1 =(n 0 + n 1 ) n 0,n 1. (28) In the case of fermions, we now have four possible states: 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, and 1, 1. We define: f 0 0, 0 = 1, 0 ; f 0 1, 0 =0, (29) f 0 1, 0 = 0, 0 ; f 0 0, 0 =0, (30) f 0 0, 1 = 0; f 0 1, 1 =0, (31) f 1 0, 0 = 0, 1 ; f 1 0, 0 = f 1 1, 0 =0, (32) f 1 1, 0 = 1, 1 ; f 1 0, 1 = 0, 0, (33) f 1 0, 1 = f 1 1, 1 =0; f 1 1, 1 = 1, 0. (34) But we must be careful in writing down the remaining actions, of f 0,f 0 on the states with n 1 = 1. These actions are constrained by consistency with the exclusion principle. We must get a sign change if we interchange the two fermions in a state. Thus, consider using the f and f operators to interchange the two fermions in the 1, 1 state: First, take the fermion away from φ 1, 1, 1 1, 0 = f 1 1, 1. (35) Then move the other fermion from φ 0 to φ 1, Finally, restore the other one to φ 0, 1, 0 0, 1 = f 1f 0 1, 0. (36) 0, 1 f 0 0, 1 = f 0f 1f 0 f 1 1, 1 (37) We require the result to be a sign change, i.e., f 0 0, 1 = 1, 1. (38) Since f 0 is the hermitian conjugate of f 0,wealsohavef 0 1, 1 = 0, 1. We therefore have the anticommutation relations: {f 0,f 0} = {f 1,f 1} =1. (39) All other anticommutators are zero, including {f 0,f 1 } = {f 0,f 1} =0,following from the antisymmetry of fermion states under interchange. 4

We may generalize these results to spaces with an arbitrary number of single particle states. Thus, let n 0,n 1,... be a vector in such a space. For the case of bosons, we have, in general: [b i,b j] = δ ij, (40) [b i,b j ] = [b i,b j]=0, (41) n 0,n 1,... = (b 1) n 1 n1! (b 0) n 0 0, (42) n0! where 0 represents the vacuum state, with all n i = 0. Note that these are the same as the photon annihilation and creation operators Â, Â, that we defined in the Electromagnetic Interactions note, except for the 2π/ω factor. For the fermion case, we have the generalization: {f i,f j } = δ ij, (43) {f i,f j } = {f i,f j } =0, (44) n 0,n 1,... = (f 1) n 1 (f 0) n 0 0. (45) The number operators are similar in both cases: B = B i = i F = F i = i b ib i, (46) f i f i, (47) and [B i,b j ]=[F i,f j ]=0. 3 Field Operators Consider now plane wave states in a box(rectangular volume,sidesl i,i= 1, 2, 3), with periodic boundary conditions: φ k (x) = eik x, (48) where k i =2πn j /L i, n j =0, ±1, ±2,... The creation operator a ks (a is either b or f, for bosons or fermions, respectively), adds a particle with 5

momentum k andspinprojections; the annilation operator a ks removes one. Note that φ k (x) is the amplitude at x to find a particle added by a ks. Now consider the operator: ψ s (x) k e ik x a ks. (49) This operator adds a particle in a superpositon of momentum states with amplitude e ik x, so that the amplitude for finding the particle at x added by ψ s (x) is a coherent sum of amplitudes eik x /, with coefficients e ik x /. That is, the amplitude at x is k e ik x [by Fourier series expansion of δ (3) (x x ): g(x )= 1 e ik x = δ (3) (x x ) (50) e ik x k d 3 (x )e ik x g(x ), (51) with g(x )=δ (3) (x x )]. The operator ψ s (x) thus adds a particle at x it creates a particle at point x (with spin projection s). Likewise, the operator ψ s (x) k e ik x a ks (52) removes a particle at x. The operators ψ s(x) andψ s (x) are called field operators. They have commutation relations following from the commutation relations for the a and a operators: ψ s (x)ψ s (x ) ± ψ s (x )ψ s (x) = 0 (53) ψ s(x)ψ s (x ) ± ψ s (x )ψ s(x) = 0, (54) where the upper sign is for fermions, and the lower sign is for bosons. For bosons, adding (or removing) a particle at x commutes with adding one at x. For fermions, adding (or removing) a particle at x anticommutes with 6

adding one at x.also, ψ s (x)ψ s (x ) ± ψ s (x )ψ s (x) = k,k e ik x e ik x { {fks,f k s } [b ks,b k s ] (55) = e ik x e ik x δ kk δ ss (56) k,k = e ik (x x δ ss k (57) = δ(x x )δ ss. (58) Thus, adding particles commutes (bosons) or anticommutes (fermions) with removing them, unless it is at the same point and spin projection. If it is at the same point (and spin projection) we may consider the case with no particle originally there the ψ ψ term gives zero, but the ψψ term does not, since it creates a particle which it then removes. If we suppress the spin indices, we construct a state with n particles at x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n by: x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n = 1 ψ (x n )...ψ (x 1 ) 0. (59) Note that such states form a useful basis for systems of many identical particles, since, by the commutation relations of the ψ s, they have the desired symmetry under interchanges of x i s. 1 For example, for fermions, gives ψ (x 2 )ψ (x 1 )= ψ (x 1 )ψ (x 2 ) (60) x 2, x 1, x 3,...,x n = x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n. (61) Note also that we can add another particle, and automatically maintain the desired symmetry: ψ (x) x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n = n +1 x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n, x. (62) 1 These Hilbert spaces of multiple, variable numbers of particles, are known as Fock spaces. 7

Now let us evaluate: ψ(x) x 1, x 2, x 3,...,x n = = = 1 ψ(x)ψ (x n )...ψ (x 1 ) 0 1 [ δ (3) (x x n ) ± ψ (x n )ψ(x) ] ψ (x n 1 )...ψ (x 1 ) 0 1 [ δ (3) (x x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n 1 ±δ (3) (x x n 1 ) x 1, x 2,...,x n 2, x n +...+ (±) n 1 δ (3) (x x 1 ) x 2, x 2,...,x n ], (63) where the upper sign is for bosons and the lower for fermions. This quantity is non-zero if and only if x = x j (and the corresponding suppressed spin projections are also the same). If this is the case, the n 1 particle state which remains after performing the operation has the correct symmetry. Note that 1 [ x 1, x 2,...,x n = ψ (x n )ψ (x n 1 )...ψ (x 1 ) 0 ] = 0 ψ(x 1 )...ψ(x n ) 1. (64) Thus, by iterating the above repeated commutation process we calculate: x 1, x 2,...,x n x 1, x 2,...,x n = δ nn (±) P P [δ(x 1 x 1)δ(x 2 x 2)...δ(x n x n)], P (65) where P is a sum over all permutations, P,ofx 1, x 2,...,x n and the ( )P factor for fermions inserts a minus sign for odd permutations. Suppose we wish to create an n particle state φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ) which has the desired symmetry, even if φ itself does not. The desired state is: Φ = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n )φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n. (66) We can calculate the amplitude for observing the particles at x 1, x 2,...,x n by: x 1, x 2,...,x n Φ = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n )φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n x 1, x 2,...,x n = 1 (±) P Pφ(x 1, x 2,...,x n). (67) P 8

That is, x 1, x 2,...,x n Φ is properly symmetrized. If φ is already properly symmetrized, then all termsin P are equal and x 1, x 2,...,x n Φ = φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ). If φ is normalized to one, and symmetrized, we have: Φ Φ = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n )φ (x 1, x 2,...,x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n d 3 (x 1)...d 3 (x n)φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n) x 1, x 2,...,x n = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n ) d 3 (x 1 )...d3 (x n ) φ (x 1, x 2,...,x n )φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ) 1 (±) P P [δ(x 1 x 1 )δ(x 2 x 2 )...δ(x n x n )] P = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n ) φ(x 1, x 2,...,x n ) 2 (68) = 1. We may write the state Φ in terms of an expansion in the amplitudes x 1, x 2,...,x n Φ for observing the particles at x 1, x 2,...,x n : Φ = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n x 1, x 2,...,x n Φ. (70) That is, we have the identity operator on symmetrized n particle states: I n = d 3 (x 1 )...d 3 (x n ) x 1, x 2,...,x n x 1, x 2,...,x n. (71) If Φ is an n particle state, then I n Φ = δ nn Φ. (72) Summing the n particle identity operators gives the identity on the symmetrized states of any number of particles: I = n=0 I n,wherei 0 = 0 0. 4 Exercises 1. Consider a two-level fermion system. With respect to basis 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, construct the explisict 4 4 matrices representing the creation and annihilation operators f 0,f 1,f 0,f 1. Check that the desired anticommutation relations are satisfied. Form the explicit matrix representation of the total number operator. 9 (69)

2. You showed in Exercise 1 of the Electromagnetic Interactions course note that under a gauge transformation: A(x,t) A (x,t)=a(x,t)+ χ(x,t) (73) Φ(x,t) Φ (x,t)=φ(x,t) t χ(x,t), (74) that the wave function (the solution to the Schrödinger equation) has the corresponding transformation: ψ (x,t)=e iqχ(x,t) ψ(x,t). (75) Generalize this result to the case of an N particle system. 10