FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW CITY OF GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON June 19, :00 AM PST

Similar documents
Risk MAP Project Coordination Meeting: Burlington County, NJ. FEMA REGION II May 8, 2013 Westampton, New Jersey

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Post-Flood Assessment

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Anchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

GTM North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. RFQ Pre-Submittal Conference

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

HAZARD VULNERABILITY & RISK ASSESSMENT

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Building Olive s Flood Resiliency

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

Oregon Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Plan Update Training Manual

Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping. Changes Since Last FIRM

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

MAP TYPES FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP MAP READING & FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES. FHBM Flood Hazard Boundary Map. FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

FEMA Flood Zone Designations

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

DRAFT WATERSHED USA FLOOD RISK REPORT 1

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Local hazard mitigation plans Disaster recovery plans Flood preparedness activities/public education Mitigation projects (construction) Post-disaster

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Association of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

FEMA s Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress March 15, Federal Emergency Management Agency

SARASOTA COUNTY Dedicated to Quality Service

Alluvial Fan Mapping and Risk Assessment

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TOOLKIT: MASTER TABLE

Division of Water Frequently asked floodplain questions

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs. Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Planning Ft. Worth, Texas February 15, 2012

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Town of Warwick, Village of Florida, Village of Greenwood Lake and Village of Warwick MULTI JURISIDICTIONAL, MULTI HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN DRAFT

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

Presented by: Michael DePue, PE, CFM Annual Georgia Association of Floodplain Management Conference Lake Lanier Islands, Georgia March 23, 2010

Flood Damage Prevention in Delaware County, NY

Monmouth County Preliminary Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps Release

Utah State General Records Retention Schedule SCHEDULE 1 GEOSPATIAL DATA SETS

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

How to Read a Flood Insurance Rate Map Tutorial. Developed September 2000 Updated June 2003

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Overview of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Recent Flood Mapping Efforts. Richard Zingarelli

Levee Certification/Accreditation Process Cameron and Hidalgo Counties

Attendees: Notes: Affiliation. Boschmann, Nate. Kampf, Stephanie Kovecses, Jen. Rhoades, Chuck Strevey, Hally

Predicting Coastal Hazards: A Southern California Demonstration

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

State Mitigation Plan Review Guide. Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study


Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Section 5 Floodplain Management Tools

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

ADDENDUM TO THE 2014 WEST WINDSOR TOWN PLAN

Town of Jamestown. Long-Term Recovery Plan

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

TROPICAL STORM ALLISON. Prepared by: John P. Ivey, PE, CFM Halff Associates, Inc. ASCE

Southern California Insect related Tree Mortality. GIS Master Plan September 2003

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Town of Union Community Rating System News

PLANNING FOR POST-DISASTER RECOVERY BRIEFING PAPERS FLOOD INSURANCE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Essex County, NJ. Preliminary Flood Insurance Study & Flood Insurance Rate Maps Release. FEMA Region 2 May 29, 2014

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

FEMA Updates Flood Plain Information For 2006

Updated Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Zoning Ordinance Update. July 16, 2015 Policy Committee

London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document

2015 CRS Community Outreach. City of Folly Beach, South Carolina Flood Plain Management Offices PO Box 48 Folly Beach, SC ext 1838

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Revised Procedure Memorandum 13 - Document Control Procedures Manual

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

An Introduction to FEMA Flood Map Updates and How it Affects You

2. BENEFIT:COST ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Town of Chatham Department of Community Development

LFA FORESTRY, FIRE, AND STATE LANDS I SSUE BRIEF UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE 2015 GENERAL SESSION. Summary

NYSDEC Optional Additional Language Model Local Law for Flood Damage Prevention Optional Additional Language

Floodplain Management Today

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Transcription:

FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW CITY OF GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON June 19, 2015 9:00 AM PST Participants City of Goldendale Larry Bellamy, Goldendale City Administrator Karl Enyeart, Goldendale Public Works Director FEMA Region X David Ratte, Regional Engineer State of Washington Morgan Mak, Washington State Emergency Management Jerry Franklin, Washington Department of Ecology Resilience Action Partners (RAP) Kathleen Warren, Region X CERC Lead STARR (FEMA Contractor) Josha Crowley, Regional Service Center (RSC) Lead Adam Pooler, GIS Lead/Senior GIS Analyst Andy Dobson, Senior Planner Emily Whitehead, Project Manager Lead Discussion Josha Crowley made introductions and presented an overview of the Risk MAP program and the different projects and products that can benefit communities. Our overall goal is discovering how FEMA can help Goldendale be a more hazard and disaster-resilient community. A copy of the presentation is included with these meeting notes as Appendix A. Pre-Discovery Meeting Interviews with Goldendale and communities the Middle Columbia-Hood Watershed have been scheduled throughout June and July, 2015. The in-person Discovery Meetings are scheduled for July 20, 21, and 22, 2015. The following information was collected during the interview. Unless otherwise noted, all comments are from Goldendale representatives.

FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON Community Contacts Larry Bellamy confirmed he is the planning director and floodplain administrator for Goldendale. Fact Sheets and Discovery Mapping The draft Discovery Map illustrates a variety of geographic data from state, national, and (when possible) local sources. These include basic geologic and geographic features, jurisdiction boundaries, hazard locations, critical facilities, floodplain data, infrastructure, aerial images, and environmentally sensitive areas. One reason for this interview is to review and refine the draft Discovery Map before the in-person Discovery Meeting with the community. New aerial mapping is pending that will update local utility mapping and service. The contract is under review, and the community is deciding how far outside city limits to collect data This project does not include LiDAR. There was discussion regarding if FEMA has funding available to assist this project and add LiDAR into the contract. This could be a possibility if the Little Klickitat River is re-studied Non-contiguous incorporated areas illustrated on the draft Discovery Map are well fields for city water and protected mountain stream water sources. The large incorporated area southwest of city limits is the WWTP location Critical facilities discussed and located on the draft Discovery Map: o 199 Industrial Way 9-1-1 communication center o 1505 South Grant Street police department o 1103 South Columbus City Hall o 205 South Columbus - County Courthouse Planning Goldendale has an urban growth boundary and long-term plans for governing future development and land uses--associated zoning maps illustrate what future build-out of the community will be Goldendale is part of Klickitat County hazard planning, and police and public safety personnel were involved in the most recent planning program Goldendale needs to be, or should be, included within a formal, FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan to access grant funding Earthquake Hazard One fault line northeast of town indicated on draft Discovery Map Community does not report any notable earthquake events Wildfire Hazard Forested areas surrounding the community are impacted by drought and invasive insects large wooded areas in water recharge areas are especially susceptible to damage Page 2 of 5

FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON There are large areas of dead/dying trees in the wooded areas north of city. These areas are being cleared in order to thin dead plant material and reduce wildfire hazard. There are some concerns about increased soil erosion In 2011 and 2013, large fires in area (outside of city) brought in many firefighters for up to two weeks to control event Landslide Hazard Some erosion concerns near bridges a normal part of having piers/structures in waterway. Additional vegetation planting could be helpful to stabilize things Some large sediment buildups were mentioned during the interview, but overall no channel migration concerns Overall, low risk and concern for landslides Severe Storm Hazard Goldendale experiences lots of high winds this is generally a windy part of the state Damage usually limited to electrical lines, power outages resulting from winter ice storms Ice storms more of a problem than heavy snow during winter Flood Hazard Some fill on private property has taken place, which alters flows but nothing is documented or modeled According to Goldendale, floodplain boundaries illustrated on the interview map is close to what they observe on the ground. The source of the floodplains on the interview map is Q3 digital data derived from original FIRM panels Columbia Street Bridge culvert has been increased therefore the revised floodplain boundary would likely be smaller than what is shown on the effective FIRM, especially south of bridge Little Klickitat River will be listed as a re-study need (entire extent within Goldendale) Downstream (west) of Columbus Ave bridge is a large collection of sediment, dryer years means slower flow and sediment falls out as water approaches bridge. Mitigation needed to remove this sediment from river and improve flow Newer bridge along N Columbus Ave is significantly different from what was there during original study specifically designed to accommodate 1% flood event, (2002-2003 construction) Nichols Engineering built bridge, uncertain if any floodplain/hydraulic modeling was done community will contact consultant and send along any data that may be available (Little Klickitat River) Pipeline Drive Bridge is a bottleneck point with erosion and sediment collection happening upstream along north bank constricting water flow on Little Klickitat River. There are no immediate plans for replacing the bridge Mill Street Bridge is also undersized for Little Klickitat River, 1% flood would overtop it according to original FIS documents/models Page 3 of 5

FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON Environmentally Sensitive Areas Shoreline master plan undergoing update, wetland mapping part of that project, will share data for draft Discovery Map when it becomes available Communications and Outreach Current community outreach/engagement through Klickitat County. Community outreach done as part of shoreline master plan, communicating especially with residents within floodplain areas Standard community webpage for announcements, general information, but no Twitter or Facebook accounts Next Steps STARR will coordinate with Goldendale and schedule Discovery Meetings within the next few weeks. Page 4 of 5

FEMA REGION X RISK MAP DISCOVERY INTERVIEW GOLDENDALE, WASHINGTON Appendix A: Interview Presentation Page 5 of 5

Risk MAP Discovery Middle Columbia-Hood Watershed Information Exchange Sessions June 2015

Information Exchange Agenda Overview of Risk MAP and Discovery Introduction to Enhanced Risk MAP Products Interactive Questionnaire Close 2

The Vision for Risk MAP Through collaboration with State, Local, and Tribal entities, Risk MAP will deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property 3

Collaborative approach Goals: quality data, public awareness, action that reduces risk Watershed-oriented Multi-Hazard Focus on up-front coordination Discovery is mandatory 4

Risk MAP Products Multi-Frequency Depth & Water-Surface Elevation (WSE) Grids 10%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.2% annual chance profiles Inundation 3 feet or less 3 to 6 feet 6 feet + HAZUS Risk Assessment & National Flood Risk Layer Enables communities to understand risk by reference to existing structure loss 5

Risk MAP Products Contributing Hazard Factors Highlights areas of concern identified throughout project FIS Reports and DFIRM Maps DFIRM and FIS will continue to fulfill regulatory requirements and support the NFIP 6

Discovery Discovery is the process of data collection and analysis with the goal of initiating a hazard risk or mitigation project and risk discussions within the watershed When: After an area/watershed has been prioritized Before a Risk MAP project is scoped or funded Required for new and updated Flood studies Flood risk assessments Mitigation planning technical assistance projects Why: Increases visibility of flood risk information, education, involvement Helps inform whether a Risk MAP project will occur in the watershed 8

Middle Columbia-Hood Discovery Federal and State Data Collection Local Issues: Identify Risk MAP Needs Need support with mitigation planning? Need mitigation projects? Need new flood study data? Need training on floodplain management? Need support developing a hazard risk outreach program? What else can FEMA do to help your community become resilient? Pre-Discovery Interviews: June 2015 Discovery Meetings: July 20-24, 2015 Risk MAP Project(s) Identified Possible FEMA Funding Allocated for Risk MAP Project 9

Discovery Interview Local Contacts Data LiDAR Local or Regional GIS Data Mitigation Planning Desired Mitigation Projects Local Hazards Earthquakes Wildfires Landslides Severe Storms Flooding Levees Environmentally Sensitive Areas Communications and Outreach Compliance and Training How would you describe your level of involvement with the development of the mitigation plan? (Considerable, Moderate, Minimal) Mitigation Planning Do you need assistance with mitigation planning in your community? (Yes, No, Possibly) Mitigation Planning Comments, Explanations, Questions 10

Questions? FEMA Kelly Stone, Risk Analyst, kelly.stone@fema.dhs.gov Kristen Meyers, Mitigation Planner, kristen.meyers@fema.dhs.gov Ted Perkins, Regional Engineer, dwight.perkins@fema.dhs.gov WASHINGTON Jerry Franklin, State Risk MAP Coordinator, jfra461@ecy.wa.gov Morgan Mak, Mitigation & Recovery Strategist, morgan.mak@mil.wa.gov STARR Emily Whitehead, emily.whitehead@starr-team.com Adam Pooler, adam.pooler@starr-team.com Becca Fricke-Croft, becca.croft@starr-team.com Josha Crowley, josha.crowley@starr-team.com Resilience Action Partners Kathleen Warren, kathleen.warren@mbakerintl.com 11