Understanding LTE Downlink ACLR Measurements using 3041 and PXI Maestro

Similar documents
Measuring ACLR Performance in LTE Transmitters. Application Note

ETSI TS V ( ) Technical Specification

ETSI EN V1.2.1 ( )

Characteristics of terrestrial IMT-Advanced systems for frequency sharing/ interference analyses

LTE UE RF measurements An introduction and overview

R&S VSE-K10x R&S FSx-K10x R&S FS-K10xPC EUTRA/LTE Measurement Software Specifications

Using R&S FSW for Efficient Measurements on Multi- Standard Radio Base Stations Application Note

Carrier Aggregation: Fundamentals and Deployments

ETSI TS V ( )

LTE Evolution for Cellular IoT Ericsson & NSN

LTE System Specifications and their Impact on RF & Base Band Circuits. Application Note. Products: R&S FSW R&S SMU R&S SFU R&S FSV R&S SMJ R&S FSUP

LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation Optimization

ETSI TS V7.1.0 ( ) Technical Specification

Mobile Communications TCS 455

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

ETSI EN V5.2.1 ( ) Harmonized European Standard

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM Measuring sideband emissions of T-DAB and DVB-T transmitters for monitoring purposes

GSM/EDGE Output RF Spectrum on the V93000 Joe Kelly and Max Seminario, Verigy

Draft ETSI EN V7.0.1 ( )

PXI. GSM/EDGE Measurement Suite

GSM frequency planning

Fast and Accurate Test of Mobile Phone Boards

Agilent E6832A W-CDMA Calibration Application

Report for GSMA on the Coexistence of ISDB-T and LTE W1306L4205. Access Networks Lead Engineer. Issue Date 15 th January 2014

Assessment of LTE 800 MHz Base Station Interference into DTT Receivers

Cooperative Techniques in LTE- Advanced Networks. Md Shamsul Alam

ACRS 2.0 User Manual 1

ETSI TR V ( ) Technical Report

Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) Technology

LTE- Advanced (3GPP Rel.11) Technology Introduction White Paper

Measurement of Adjacent Channel Leakage Power on 3GPP W-CDMA Signals with the FSP

An Interference Avoiding Wireless Network Architecture for Coexistence of CDMA x EVDO and LTE Systems

Simulation and Performance Evaluation of co-existing GSM and UMTS systems Master Thesis

Analysis of Macro - Femtocell Interference and Implications for Spectrum Allocation

The Phase Modulator In NBFM Voice Communication Systems

DVB-T and Wireless Microphone Exclusion Area Computation Through Interference Analysis

Spectrum sharing, door radar & mobiel breedband

ECC REPORT 162 PRACTICAL MECHANISM TO IMPROVE THE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN GSM-R AND PUBLIC MOBILE NETWORKS AND GUIDANCE ON PRACTICAL COORDINATION

ELETRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

R&S FSW signal and spectrum analyzer: best in class now up to 50 GHz

HD Radio FM Transmission System Specifications Rev. F August 24, 2011

DERIVATION OF A BLOCK EDGE MASK (BEM) FOR TERMINAL STATIONS IN THE 2.6 GHz FREQUENCY BAND ( MHz)

MIMO Antenna Systems in WinProp

Test Toolkit v3.0 SignalMeister RF Communications

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

Voice services over Adaptive Multi-user Orthogonal Sub channels An Insight

REPORT ITU-R M Rep. ITU-R M (2004)

R&S CMW500 Wideband Radio Communication Tester Specifications

COMPATIBILITY STUDY FOR UMTS OPERATING WITHIN THE GSM 900 AND GSM 1800 FREQUENCY BANDS

Agilent AN 1316 Optimizing Spectrum Analyzer Amplitude Accuracy

Throughput for TDD and FDD 4 G LTE Systems

CPRI Specification V6.0 ( )

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

MoCA 1.1 Specification for Device RF Characteristics

Evaluation of Co-existence interference between CDMA 1900MHz & WCDMA 2100MHz

AN Application Note: FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz. FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz

Co-channel and Adjacent Channel Interference Measurement of UMTS and GSM/EDGE Systems in 900 MHz Radio Band

How To Understand Power Consumption Of An Option Wireless Module

MOBILE PHONE REPEATERS

LTE PHY Fundamentals Roger Piqueras Jover

Timing Errors and Jitter

TUTORIAL FOR CHAPTER 8

Transmitting Live Aircraft Security Data by 3G Unlocking the Potential of 3G Developing an Air Traffic Management (ATM) Security System

Base Station Adjacent Time Slot Rejection Measurement with CMD and SME

In 3G/WCDMA mobile. IP2 and IP3 Nonlinearity Specifications for 3G/WCDMA Receivers 3G SPECIFICATIONS

Spectrum and Power Measurements Using the E6474A Wireless Network Optimization Platform

PXI Modules. 3070A PXI High Performance RF Digitizer

NSN White paper February Nokia Solutions and Networks Smart Scheduler

Approved xx Month 2015

MSB MODULATION DOUBLES CABLE TV CAPACITY Harold R. Walker and Bohdan Stryzak Pegasus Data Systems ( 5/12/06) pegasusdat@aol.com

Lecture 1. Introduction to Wireless Communications 1

Application Note AN-00126

GSM Testers for Rent and Sale

LTE Performance and Analysis using Atoll Simulation

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S (Questions ITU-R 48/4 and ITU-R 70/4)

3GPP Wireless Standard

ETSI EN V7.1.1 ( )

CDMA Network Planning

RF Measurements Using a Modular Digitizer

Proposal for Candidate Radio Interface Technologies for IMT-Advanced Based on LTE Release 10 and Beyond (LTE-Advanced)

Optimizing IP3 and ACPR Measurements

10 Steps to Determine 3G/4G IP Data Throughput

Multiple Access Techniques

Dimensioning, configuration and deployment of Radio Access Networks. part 5: HSPA and LTE HSDPA. Shared Channel Transmission

How To Write An En V1.1.2

A Novel Decentralized Time Slot Allocation Algorithm in Dynamic TDD System

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

Achieving New Levels of Channel Density in Downstream Cable Transmitter Systems: RF DACs Deliver Smaller Size and Lower Power Consumption

HSPA+ and LTE Test Challenges for Multiformat UE Developers

PD Power Bandwidth- Worst Case Analysis July 2008

LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum: European Regulation and Co-existence Considerations

End to End Delay Performance Evaluation for VoIP in the LTE Network

Yu.M. Tulyakov, D.Ye. Shakarov, A.A. Kalashnikov. Keywords: Data broadcasting, cellular mobile systems, WCDMA, GSM.

LTE VoIP Capacity with Soft Frequency Reuse. Dipl.-Ing. Maciej Mühleisen ComNets TUHH FFV Workshop

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M * Transport information and control systems Dedicated short range communications at 5.8 GHz

COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND RADIO MICROPHONES IN BANDS IV AND V

LTE-Advanced UE Capabilities Mbps and Beyond!

Radio-frequency channel arrangements for fixed wireless system operating in the GHz band

Transcription:

Understanding LTE Downlink ACLR Measurements using 3041 and PXI Maestro Application Note The most important thing we build is trust Introduction Transmitter ACLR requirements defined in 3GPP 34.141 section 6.6.2 is the most commonly used unwanted emissions measurement methods performed on devices in manufacturing. This application note describes how to configure PXI Maestro for a variety of uses cases. The conformance requirement is the less stringent of two measurements which relate to either the absolute power dbm/mhz at the frequency offset or the dbc power at the frequency offset relative to the carrier power. For 3GPP 36.141 V10.6.0 the relative limits are -44.2dBc and the absolute limits are:- Base station type Category A Wide Area Category B1 / B2 Wide Area Local Area BS Home BS Absolute Limit -13dBm/MHz -15dBm/MHz -32dBm/MHz -50dBm/MHz Example In the case of a Local Area BS where the device measured output power is +24 dbm for a 20MHz BW, then the absolute limit is -19dBm and the relative limit is -20.2dBm and hence the less stringent absolute limit applies. If the bandwidth is changed to 10MHz then the absolute limit is -22dBm, which more stringent than the relative limit of - 20.2 and hence the relative limit applies. The shaded areas in the table below show the less stringent requirement for each bandwidth and Local Area base station output power rating. Local Area BS ALCR Bandwidth Power 5MHz 10MHz 20MHz dbm Relative limit Absolute limit Relative limit Absolute limit Relative limit Absolute limit 24-20.2-25 -20.2-22 -20.2-19 21-23.2-25 -23.2-22 -23.2-19 18-26.2-25 -26.2-22 -26.2-19 15-29.2-25 -29.2-22 -29.2-19 www.cobham. com/wireless

Configuring Maestro for DL ACLR measurements Maestro Analysis (spectrum) configuration settings enable the ACLR pass/fail result to be defined by the underlying analysis library and/or by the Maestro application. This provides a lot of flexibility but does require the user to fully understand how to configure. Two key configuration setting are the ACLR configuration mode and the ACLR Limit Mode. These determine how the outcome of the ACLR pass/fail measurement result is derived. The table below explains the outcome of these selections.

ACLR Configuration Mode Auto User Defined ACLR Limit Mode Category A Wide Area Category B1 Wide Area Category B2 Wide Area Local Home User Defined and filter settings are defined by 3GPP 36.141 V10.6.0 Table 6.6.2-1 (FDD) and Table 6.6.2-2 (TDD). See appendix and filter settings are defined by the User defined ACLR Configuration setting. The Limit for each adjacent channel is the least stringent of -44.2dB or the absolute limits in the table below - as defined in 3GPP 36.141 V10.6.0 Section 6.6.2.5. and filter settings are defined by 3GPP 36.141 V10.6.0 Table 6.6.2-1 (FDD) and Table 6.6.2-2 (TDD). See appendix and filter settings are defined by the User defined ACLR Configuration setting. The Limits are defined by the User Defined ACLR Limit setting, and must be specified as both a relative and absolute limit for each adjacent channel. The least stringent of these will be applied. Measurements The test group/point measurements that can be performed include. 1) ACLR absolute 2) ACLR applied limits 3) ACLR Pass/Fail (as determined by the settings in the above table) 4) ACLR Relative ACLR absolute results return an array of dbm values. A pass / fail verdict can be configured independent of any settings configured for the ACLR pass/fail measurement by applying limits to the absolute result in the normal Maestro manner. ACLR relative results return an array of dbc values. A pass / fail verdict can be configured independent of any settings configured for the ACLR pass/fail measurement by applying limits to the relative result in the normal Maestro manner. ACLR applied limits return the actual limits used to compute the ACLR Pass/Fail expressed in dbc. Where an absolute limit was chosen, it is expressed as a relative limit for this result. The limit value can be either a single value for all offsets or a different value for each offset. In the case where different values are used then the number of limit values must be equal to the number of frequency points in the ACLR limit settings (whether or not using user defined or Auto).

Use Case 1 Standard 3GPP ACLR Configuration & Limits The test plan calls for ACLR testing of a 20MHz BW Local Area BS using standard 3GPP ACLR offsets and limits. In this use case the test group/point settings should be configured as follows: ACLR Configuration Mode: Auto ACLR Limit Mode: Local Note when the ACLR Pass/Fail measurement is enabled, the limits used will the less stringent of the absolute or relative limits, irrespective of whether the ACLR Absolute or ACLR Relative results are enable or disabled. This is all that needs to be done for 3GPP ACLR testing. Use Case 2 User Defined Configuration & 3GPP Limits This use case is the same as Use Case 1 above except that a user defined configuration will be used for demonstration purposes. If non-standard offsets are required, the procedure is the same. In this use case the test group/point settings should be configured as follows: ACLR Configuration Mode: User Defined ACLR Limit Mode: Local User Defined ACLR Configuration: As per table below Index Alpha Bandwidth Frequency Offset 0 0 20 MHz 0 1 0 20 MHz -20000000 2 0 20 MHz +20000000 3 0 20 MHz -40000000 4 0 20 MHz +40000000 Note that the order of the offsets must be as shown in the table above. Use Case 3 Standard 3GPP Configuration & User Defined Limits This use case is the same as Use Case 1 above except user defined limits shall be used rather than the 3GPP ones. Note that the limits used in this example are the 3GPP ones, but the same principle can be used for non-standard limits. In this use case the test group/point settings should be configured as follows: ACLR Configuration Mode: Auto ACLR Limit Mode: User Defined User Defined ACLR Limit: As per table below Index Relative Limit (dbc) Absolute Limit 0 0 0 1-44.2-19 2-44.2-19 3-44.2-19 4-44.2-19 Note that index 0 is the centre channel (reference) which does not contribute to the ACLR Pass/Fail result therefore the limits are unimportant.

Use Case 4 Customer wishes to ignore 3GPP ACLR conformance requirements for LTE TDD 20MHz but instead apply only a dbc relative limit to each of 4 offsets, -40, +40, -20, +20MHz. In this case the test group/point settings can be configured to either Auto or User Defined. Auto can be used because the offsets required correspond to the 3GPP offsets. The test group/point settings should be configured as follows: ACLR Configuration Mode: Auto ACLR Limit Mode: User Defined User Defined ACLR Limit: As per table below Index Relative Limit (dbc) Absolute Limit 0 0 0 1-44.2-1000 2-44.2-1000 3-44.2-1000 4-44.2-1000 Note that index 0 is the centre channel (reference) which does not contribute to the ACLR Pass/Fail result therefore the limits are unimportant. Since the ACLR Pass/Fail measurement will always use the less stringent of the absolute or relative limits, the absolute limits must be chosen such that they are so stringent that the relative limits will always be chosen setting a very small number will accomplish this. This method of applying only a relative limit check will work just fine but is not recommended it is preferable (less confusing) to follow the method detailed in use case 5 instead. Use Case 5 This use case is the same as use case 4 the customer wishes to ignore 3GPP ACLR conformance requirements for LTE TDD 20MHz but instead apply only a dbc relative limit to each of 4 offsets, -40, +40, -20, +20MHz. In this case the test group/point settings can be configured to either Auto or User Defined. Auto can be used because the offsets required correspond to the 3GPP offsets. The test group/point settings should be configured as follows: ACLR Configuration Mode: User Defined ACLR Limit Mode: Doesn t matter User Defined ACLR Configuration: As per table below Index Alpha Bandwidth Frequency Offset 0 0 20 MHz 0 1 0 20 MHz -20000000 2 0 20 MHz +20000000 3 0 20 MHz -40000000 4 0 20 MHz +40000000 Note that the first offset (index 0) must be the carrier signal, the remaining offsets can be in any order provided that the same order is used for the result limits (see below). The ACLR relative measurement should be enabled and the ACLR Pass/Fail result disabled in the test group/point measurements. A limit is then applied by setting comparison type to compare with high limit. The Array limit type should be set to compare each element to a different value. Then the high limit values of dbc would be entered for the offsets starting with the reference value (which will be 0 and hence a limit value >0 is required) then followed by the remaining offsets in the same order as they were defined in the ACLR Configuration (table above).

This method of performing an ACLR measurement with only relative limits is arguably more intuitive that that shown in use case 4, so is recommended.

Appendix Channel bandwidth of E-UTRA lowest (highest) carrier transmitted BW Channel [MHz] Table 6.6.2-1: Base Station ACLR in paired spectrum BS adjacent channel centre frequency offset below the lowest or above the highest carrier centre frequency transmitted Assumed adjacent channel carrier (informative) Filter on the adjacent channel frequency and corresponding filter bandwidth ACLR limit 1.4, 3.0, 5, 10, 15, 20 BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db 2 x BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 2.5 MHz 3.84 Mcps UTRA RRC (3.84 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 7.5 MHz 3.84 Mcps UTRA RRC (3.84 Mcps) 44.2 db NOTE 1: BW Channel and BW Config are the channel bandwidth and transmission bandwidth configuration of the E-UTRA lowest (highest) carrier transmitted on the assigned channel frequency. NOTE 2: The RRC filter shall be equivalent to the transmit pulse shape filter defined in [15], with a chip rate as defined in this table. For operation in unpaired spectrum, the ACLR shall be higher than the value specified in Table 6.6.2-2. Channel bandwidth of E-UTRA lowest (highest) carrier transmitted BW Channel [MHz] Table 6.6.2-2: Base Station ACLR in unpaired spectrum with synchronized operation BS adjacent channel centre frequency offset below the lowest or above the highest carrier centre frequency transmitted Assumed adjacent channel carrier (informative) Filter on the adjacent channel frequency and corresponding filter bandwidth ACLR limit 1.4, 3.0 BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db 2 x BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 0.8 MHz 1.28 Mcps UTRA RRC (1.28 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 2.4 MHz 1.28 Mcps UTRA RRC (1.28 Mcps) 44.2 db 5, 10, 15, 20 BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db 2 x BW Channel E-UTRA of same BW Square (BW Config ) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 0.8 MHz 1.28 Mcps UTRA RRC (1.28 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 2.4 MHz 1.28 Mcps UTRA RRC (1.28 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 2.5 MHz 3.84 Mcps UTRA RRC (3.84 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 7.5 MHz 3.84 Mcps UTRA RRC (3.84 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 5 MHz 7.68 Mcps UTRA RRC (7.68 Mcps) 44.2 db BW Channel /2 + 15 MHz 7.68 Mcps UTRA RRC (7.68 Mcps) 44.2 db NOTE 1: BW Channel and BW Config are the channel bandwidth and transmission bandwidth configuration of the E-UTRA lowest (highest) carrier transmitted on the assigned channel frequency. NOTE 2: The RRC filter shall be equivalent to the transmit pulse shape filter defined in [15], with a chip rate as defined in this table. NOTE: If the above Test Requirements differ from the Minimum Requirement then the Test Tolerance applied for this test is non-zero. The Test Tolerance for this test and the explanation of how the Minimum Requirement has been relaxed by the Test Tolerance are given in Annex G.