Energy Use at Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants

Similar documents
Description of the Water Conserv II Facility

Aeration Efficiency Guide

Energy Audits Waste Water Treatment Plants

Holistic Aeration and Chemical Optimization Saves Big Money from 1 MGD to 600 MGD. Trevor Ghylin, PE PhD

MODELING WASTEWATER AERATION SYSTEMS TO DISCOVER ENERGY SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES By Steven A. Bolles Process Energy Services, LLC

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

Example Calculations Evaluation for Fine Bubble Aeration System. Red Valve Company, Inc. 700 NORTH BELL AVENUE CARNEGIE, PA

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant Super Storm Sandy Recovery

CWD BALDWIN PLANT NEW RESIDUALS HANDLING SYSTEM

Appendix 2-1. Sewage Treatment Process Options

ACTIFLO Process For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment

The City of Boulder 75 th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility

During the past decade, the city of

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

THE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

Chapter 8: Common Treatment Facilities, Programs, Operational Improvements and Policies for the Recommended Plan

ENERGY CONSERVATION STUDY. White House Utility District Hendersonville, TN

aquateam Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Centre A/S Report no: Project no: O Project manager: Dr. Bjørn Rusten.

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

City of Rutland Wastewater Treatment Facility Phosphorus Removal Planning Study

MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ENERGY EVALUATION FOR ITHACA AREA WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

Ann Arbor Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Renovations Project September 2015

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

Grit Removal Systems Simple, low cost, effective grit removal to enhance plant performance

Engineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training

How To Water System

Combination of advanced aeration system and membrane bioreactor for winery waste water treatment

Applying Life Cycle Assessment to Drinking Water Treatment

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems

William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility. Facility Overview & Information

Process and Energy Audits at Water and Wastewater Facilities. Thomas Devine, CAP, CEM, LEED AP April

Facility Classification Standards

Energy Audits for Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants and Pump Stations

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.


Upper Occoquan Service Authority Centreville, Virginia A Case Study

WATER/WASTEWATER: ACHIEVING THE THREE LEVELS OF REDUNDANCY

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

PROPAK AquaBio Complete Water Restoration Systems

Maricopa Association of Governments. Technical Memorandum No. 1 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COSTS. August 2001

Asset Management Answering the 5 Core Questions

POTW PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES

Energy Efficiency Strategies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

New York State Energy Research & Development Authority. Water & Wastewater Energy Management. Best Practices Handbook. March 2010

Membrane Bioreactor Performance Compared to Conventional Wastewater Treatment

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Expanded Treatment Facilities within the City of Detroit

Irrigation Pump Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Energy Savings Calculation Methodology. Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County

Water Water Treatment Plant Tour

Consumers Energy Business Energy Efficiency Program

Common Sense Approaches to Saving Energy and Money. Conrad Meyer Technical Manager - WRP

Migrating Guelph Wastewater s Data Monitoring Program to a Web-Based Reporting System:

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

COD/BOD 5 Reduction with ROTAMAT Fine and Micro Screens

5. TREATMENT FACILITIES

Technical Feasibility of a Wet Weather Flow Treatment Facility

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

Residuals Management Somersworth Drinking Water Treatment Facility. Ian Rohrbacher, Treatment Operator IV

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Division of Water Pollution Control Class K Study Guide Industrial Wastewater Operator Certification

Town of New Castle Utility Department Introduction

City of Dallas 1.5 MGD WWTP

Centrifugal Fans and Pumps are sized to meet the maximum

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

The South Central Regional Wastewater

Appendix F Use of spill basin to further reduce final effluent variability - report

Coagulation and Flocculation

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Population Wastewater Flows...

WWTP RETROFIT. Smith & Loveless Inc. Also in this issue: Do You Have Emergency Backup? Aging Clarifiers Retrofit to Like New

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

SECONDARY TREATMENT ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Six Municipalities, One Watershed: A Collaborative Approach to Remove Phosphorus in the Assabet River Watershed

Wastewater Nutrient Removal

Raptor Septage Acceptance Plant. For Municipal Wastewater, Septage and Grease Trap Applications

Indiana s Newest Filtration Facility; East Chicago

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

E nv i ro n m e nta l. Biotec 5-7. Sustainable, Reliable, Affordable

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

GRIT CHARACTERIZATION IN FLORIDA WASTEWATER PLANTS

POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT BLOWERS & VACUUM PUMPS. Water & Wastewater Treatment Solutions

CHAPTER 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Reactor Clarifier Solids Contact Clarifiers

Cooling Tower Sidestream Filtration A Green, Proven Cost Reduction Technology

Equipment and Instrument Tagging Requirements

SYNERGISTIC APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Parameters for Effective Service Checking costs and performance in wastewater treatment Endress + Hauser GmbH + Co. KG

Best Practice Guide NO. BPGCS002. Wastewater Treatment Activated Sludge Process

HUBER Vacuum Rotation Membrane VRM Bioreactor

Georgia Department of Public Health. Georgia Onsite Sewage Management Systems. Background and Use of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Georgia

lforrnation Requir C -INF lucture & OPER eraf - Drawing No Drawing No

TALLINN WATER TREATMENT AND SEWERAGE Tuuli Myllymaa

Ion Exchange Softening


Design Criteria & Service Goals

Water Efficiency. Water Management Options. Boilers. for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Facilities. Boiler Water Impurities

Pond Recirculating Production Systems

Transcription:

Energy Use at Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E. University of Memphis Civil Engineering Department March 13, 2012

Energy Use at WTPs

Energy Energy is the ability or capacity to do work. The most common form of energy used in water and wastewater treatment plants is electric energy.

Energy Usage There are approximately 60,000 public community water utilities in the United States. 3 to 4% of the nation s electricity is used for treating and distributing potable water (and treating wastewater). Almost 80% of the total energy is used for transporting water.

The national average of electricity consumption (power) for conventional surface water plants is 700 to 1800 kwh per million gallon of water treated. The power consumption for facilities treating groundwater is greater than that for a surface water. Additional pumping is required to transport water from aquifers to the surface treatment.

Energy consumption at water facilities varies significantly depending on: Location and topography of the service area Plant size Treatment processes used Age and condition of the water transmission system

Energy Usage The majority of energy consumption in water facilities is due to the transportation of: 1. Raw water from the source to the plant. 2. Water within the treatment plant (in plant pumping). 3. Treated water from the plant to the distribution system (high service pumping).

Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs): ECMs are defined as a physical improvement, plant operation, or equipment maintenance practice that results in a reduction in utility or operating cost.

Baseline Measurements Refer to the analysis of existing energy bills and operating data to identify: The current level of consumption Peak energy usage Costs for an existing WTP process, or system. Are made before implementing any ECMs so that the positive effect of each ECM can be measured.

Simple steps for identifying ECMs: 1. Understand and become familiar with the procedures used by the power company to bill for energy used. 2. Analyze utility bills and request time of day charts for kw and kwh used. Review the trends of demand charges. If possible, change the schedule for elective operations, such as exercising equipment with large motors during periods of off peak demand charge.

3. Review historical energy consumption by the WTP as a whole as well as any individuallymetered components (36 months of data is preferred; 24 months is required as a minimum). 4. Develop a list of significant energyconsuming equipment. Then factor into the assessment the amount of time the equipment is operated.

5. Define current process control procedures. 6. Analyze data collected to identify equipment presenting the greatest opportunity for improvement. Research the unit and identify potential ECMs.

Pumping is the largest energy user in a water treatment system. There are numerous operation and maintenance (O&M) practices that can be implemented to either: Improve pumping system efficiency, or Restore original efficiency Inefficient pumping operations simply waste energy and money.

Relative Distribution of Energy* Relative Distribution of Energy by Process Process Admin., Lab, Maint. Finished Water Pumping Clearwell Storage Cl2 Feed In Plant Pumping Backwash Pumping Hydraulic Surface Wash Gravity Filtration Sedimentation Flocculation Rapid Mix Polymer Feed Coagulant Feed Raw Water Pumping 2.1 0 0.4 8.6 0.5 0.3 3 0.3 1.4 4.7 0.4 0.2 11.1 67 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 * For a sample 10 MGD surface water treatment plant % of Total Energy Use

Energy Use at WWTPs

Energy use for a given size WWTP may vary significantly depending on: Location Strength of wastewater Level of treatment In plant recovery Type of treatment process Mode of operation

Relative distribution of energy use at a secondary wastewater treatment* plant: Relative Distribution of Energy by Process Process Post Aeration/Cl2 Mixer Lighting Heating Solids Dewatering Utility Water Effluent Filters Thickener, P.S. Secondary Clarifier RAS Activated Sludge Primary P.S., Clarifier Headworks Raw Water P.S. 3.1 2.2 7.1 7.0 3.6 0.9 1.6 3.7 10.3 0.4 4.5 55.6 * Sample 7.5 MGD WWTP 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Total WWTP Energy Use

Primary energy uses are those directly associated with on site electrical power and fuel requirements. Secondary energy uses are associated with materials manufacture and transport and manufacture of consumable chemicals used in the treatment process.

Most often, aeration is the single largest energy user (commonly around 50% of the total), followed by pumping systems. The influent wastewater pumping energy requirements alone can represent 15 to 70% of the total WWTP use of electrical energy depending on: WWTP site elevation Influent sewer elevation

Energy costs account for: 15 to 30% of the operation and maintenance (O&M) budgets at a large WWTP, and 30 to 40% of O&M costs at a small WWTP.

Secondary Treatment Overall, aeration devices used for the activated sludge system represent the most significant consumers of energy within a WWTP. Most aeration systems are classified as: Diffused Dispersed Mechanical

The ability of any type of equipment to dissolve oxygen within a wastewater treatment system depends on: Diffuser device type Basin geometry Diffuser depth Turbulence Ambient air pressure Temperature Spacing and placement of the aeration devices Diurnal variations in wastewater flow and organic load

Having high DO (dissolved oxygen) concentrations within aeration tanks is a waste of energy If the system uses blowers, an operator should cut back on blowers or blower output. If the facility has coarse bubble diffusers, then a fine bubble diffuser system that is more efficient and uses less energy should be considered.

If a facility has surface aerators, the submergence on the unit may be decreased, which results in: Less DO concentration Less amperage load on the motor (less electrical cost) If the liquid level of the basin cannot be adjusted, then: VFDs should be installed on the aerators, or Aerators should automatically start and stop based on time intervals.

Activated sludge aeration equipment uses large horsepower motors and multiple units such as: Centrifugal type blowers Positive displacement blowers High speed turbine (HST) blowers Surface aerators Adding excessive air into the aeration tanks will only result in a waste of energy.

Improving the operation of aeration systems is one of the best ways to reduce the energy costs for wastewater treatment. The amount of oxygen required by the activated sludge process depends on: Flow rate Organic waste load

DO probes (sensors), in conjunction with online instrumentation systems perform the critical function of measuring DO levels in the aeration process. Typically, oxygen requirements vary throughout the day by a factor of 5 to 7 and can be regulated by automatically controlling systems.

Air flowrates may be automatically adjusted by: Changing blower speed Adjusting blower inlet guide vanes Operating control vanes A key to controlling the activated sludge process (and energy use) is matching oxygen supply to oxygen demand.

Typically, as wastewater flow and oxygen demand increase in the morning based on the diurnal flow of a WWTP, more aeration is needed. Conversely, as flow decreases during the night, the air supply should be reduced.

A general rule has always been to maintain a DO concentration of 2mg/L in the aeration tanks. Once the carbonaceous and nitrogenous oxygen demand have been satisfied, maintaining any DO above 2 mg/l is excessive and a waste of energy. A number of treatment facilities maintain a DO concentration of 0.5 to 2.0 mg/l at the end of the aeration basin.