Land Use, Urban Design, and Planning Context



Similar documents
City of Tampa Zoning Districts

Corridor Goals and Objectives

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

VANDERBILT COMPARISON

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Frederick. Frederick. Maryland. Smart Growth Successes. Frederick. Maryland Department of Planning

THE RUSKIN COMMUNITY PLAN

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

Appendix C Related Studies

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision...

Downtown Core Sub-district

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Volume II Recommendations January 2006 City of Madison Comprehensive Plan

Opal Service District Plan

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

1. Land Use. Chapter 1: Land Use 1-1 Adopted 10/2/09 Amended 3/22/11, 8/16/11

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

Envision Venice Strategic Plan for Fiscal Year Ending. September 30, Preserving and Enhancing the Venice Quality of Life.

Restoration. a brief look at

Presentation to Knox County Commission Monday, February 23, 2015

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Comparison of Goals and Policies Between Draft Plan (November 28, 2012) and Final Draft Plan (March 20, 2013)

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

Schenk-Atwood Neighborhood Business District Master Plan

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #1 December 8, :00 p.m.

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

KEYPORT COMMUNITY PLAN

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

01/31/13 ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON. Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 6. RURAL LAND USE POLICY Modification No. 8

Downtown Community Planning Council Meeting offebruary 18, 2015

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: September 24, 2012 Planning Board Case No. 1248Q

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

ALACHUA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A-2, RURAL ESTATE-AGRICULTURE DISTRICT

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Introduction. Residential Development. Plan Foundation. Growth Management Concepts

CITY OF FLORENCE NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY SECOND PUBLIC MEETING

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Understanding the tax base consequences of local economic development programs

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations. Table of Contents

Chapter 9: Transportation

Kitchener Growth Management Strategy. January 2009 KGMS

Fast Track A Successful Redevelopment: The Palm Beach Outlets Story

CITY COUNCIL PACKET MEMORANDUM

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

FILE NO.: Z-6915-C. Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

HARRIS TEETER AT LADY S ISLAND CITY OF BEAUFORT DRB CONCEPTUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE Submittal Date: September 2, 2015 Meeting Date: September 10, 2015

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Zoning Districts, Gwinnett County, Georgia

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73

Town of Beaufort, NC US Highway 70 Commercial Project

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF BALTIMORE And THE MID-ATLANTIC FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Request for Information

R-40 Single-Family Residential

Statutory Changes to the Community Planning Act (Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes):

RDA Development Opportunities

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

Prepared by: Samuel Dennis Date prepared: December 21, 2011

Transcription:

3. Land Use, Urban Design, and Planning Context 3.1 VVI his chapter describes the existing conditions in the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea related to land use, urban design, and the planning context, and evaluates the potential impacts to the area s existing land uses. 3.2 UL FK 3.2.1 PVIU PLI FF F-DL D IP LD U PLIC PL (2000) his plan was originally written in 1981 and subsequently updated in 19 and 2000. he airport is just north of the Plan rea, but the land surrounding the airport, designated as the irport eview rea is affected by noise levels of 60 or higher Community oise quivalent Level (CL) and must comply with safety standards. he policy plan prioritizes minimizing high noise levels affecting the public by limiting the types of land uses within the irport eview rea. he plan deems the maximum acceptable noise level in residential areas is 60 CL and prohibits new housing or schools from being developed in these areas. If it is determined that there is no other location where such uses can be developed, the plan requires that new housing in the irport eview rea be built so that interior noise measures no more than 45 CL. Land uses other than residential, hospitals, nursing homes, libraries, nurseries, churches, auditoriums and amphitheaters are acceptable in areas above 65 CL noise level. UH F L IHBHD L DVLP PJC D (2004) In 2004, there was an amendment and restatement to the outhwest Fresno eneral eighborhood enewal rea edevelopment Project (), last amended in 18 and originally adopted in 1969. he project area is bounded by and located to the west of Highways 180 and. he project area partially overlaps the pecific Plan rea, including the areas located between the Fresno Chandler xecutive irport and Church venue as well as the lm and orth venue corridors. he purpose of the is to eliminate blight, improve economic conditions, and ensure development potential and growth within the project area. he addresses issues including the redevelopment of undeveloped and under developed areas, creation of site design standards, assemblage of appropriately sized parcels, and expansion of housing supply. PLCK 3-1

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX F P: CUI PL (2009) In 2009, the City of Fresno, est Fresno Coalition for conomic Development and the California ndowment worked together to assess est Fresno s assets and create a five year plan of action. he effort involved a comprehensive community effort involving City Council members, community leaders, organizations, a steering committee, and focus groups. he area s assets were identified and grouped into three categories: 1) economic assets; 2) social capital (including education, faith based communities, and social services; and 3) quality of life. t the end of the process, a list of 20 actions were identified, which included fast tracking and coordinating new development, balancing affordable and market rate housing development, and increasing mixed use, infill development, particularly on abandoned properties; attracting businesses to the area and building relationships with the existing business community; improving financial literacy and promoting higher education/training for residents; increasing funding for area schools and developing a new middle school; coordinating and promoting social and faith based services to share resources and avoid duplication; developing a health clinic; and hosting events that promote the area s cultural diversity. ctions completed thus far include construction of aston iddle chool and construction of a new health care facility (Clinic ierra Vista). UH F BUILDI IHBHD CPCI P (2014) he outhwest Fresno Building eighborhood Capacity Program (BCP) is an ongoing planning effort which falls within the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea. It provides insight on the community s ideas for improvements in the realm of community health and crime, economic development, urban design and infrastructure, and community engagement in southwest Fresno. summary of the planning process reiterates the frustration that the community has with so much planning in the area which has resulted in studies, but limited follow through and implementation of improvements. his effort has resulted in the creation of a resident leadership group called: ction and Change for outhwest Fresno (ction and Change). It identifies the top most community priorities and conducted surveys to assess the existing status of these priorities: 1. ll residents feel safe in their neighborhood. ell functioning streetlights. lleyways that are clean, safe, and walkable. Few, if any, vacant and unattended properties. 2. esidents experience economic success. esidents with enhanced soft and hard skills in specific fields broad spectrum of local businesses catering to needs of local residents. F L PL (2014) he Fresno eneral Plan, adopted in 2014, establishes a vision for the city and creates a set of policies and implementation actions to achieve the community s vision. lthough the eneral Plan discusses future development, it is still considered a part of the City s existing regulatory framework. verall, the eneral Plan s major strategic direction for future growth focuses on creating a more urban fabric that includes infill development and rehabilitation projects while respecting the suburban character of established neighborhoods. 3-2 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX he eneral Plan has a horizon year of 2035 and buildout year of 2056 and beyond, and guides future development to four Development reas, which includes areas within the current city limits as well as those that require future annexation to the City. he pecific Plan rea is located within Development rea 1 outh (D 1 outh) and only includes land within the city s limits. he eneral Plan details the residential buildout capacity to accommodate 10,500 housing units, with 76 percent of those units located on sites requiring annexation. Beyond 2035, the eneral Plan projects a total of 20,649 housing units of residential development capacity under buildout in D 1 outh, with 73 percent of those units located in growth areas requiring annexation. his information can be found in able 1 3 on page 1 21 of the eneral Plan. eneral Plan land uses for this area are shown on page 3 23 in the eneral Plan (see Figure 3.1). In regard to the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea and other parts of southwest Fresno, the eneral Plan encourages more attention to the area and calls for strong improvements within it. he eneral Plan envisions Complete eighborhoods replacing the current hodgepodge of industrial, agricultural, and residential land use patterns with neighborhood scale development. he complete neighborhood envisioned by the eneral Plan is exemplified along a future Bus apid ransit (B) corridor along California venue, anchored by a regional shopping center and community park between Church and Jensen venues along LK venue. his is adjacent to but not included in the pecific Plan rea for the outhwest pecific Plan. In addition to the emphasis on Complete eighborhoods, the City of Fresno has contributed to the Building Healthy Communities campaign, which is led by the California ndowment and strives to provide disadvantaged communities equitable access to resources that improve health. o support healthy community initiatives, the eneral Plan provides land use and urban design policies to increase access to physical exercise and fresh food. L PL VIL IPC P s required by the California nvironmental Quality ct (CQ), the eneral Plan s aster nvironmental Impact eport (I) analyzes the environmental impacts for the eneral Plan and its identified projects and development type areas. he I describes the impacts of the eneral Plan s four development types: infill areas, growth areas, development areas, and subsequent projects. any of these development types overlap each other, as well as the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea. his potential new development is projected to be fully realized in year 2056 and will reduce the amount of existing vacant land and open space. hese eneral Plan outcomes will result in a variety of significant and unavoidable environmental impacts related to urbanization including loss of farmland, illumination of the dark sky, increase in greenhouse gas emissions beyond the year 2020, and potentially exceeded levels of service thresholds on roadways. Infill reas he pecific Plan rea is predominantly categorized as a on Corridor Infill rea. However, among the identified primary areas of infill (new development such as housing on vacant lots situated within existing developed areas) in the eneral Plan (see Figure 3.2), the California venue B Corridor is located within the pecific Plan rea. he eneral Plan envisions California venue as a major B corridor with a complete street system and transit network that connects southwest Fresno to other parts of the city. PLCK 3-3

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Figure 3.1 outhwest Development rea (D 1 outh) Land Use Diagram he area near Veteran s Community ctivity Center, located at the southeast corner of California and arks venues, plans to accommodate urban neighborhood residential density (a compact mixed use community with walkable access to services and transit) at the core, with Complete eighborhoods (wellconnected neighborhoods for all modes of travel) surrounding those developments. 3-4 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Figure 3.2 Infill reas Identified in the eneral Plan rowth reas he eneral Plan s rowth reas are defined as areas within the City s phere of Influence, but outside the existing City limits (see Figure 3.3). reas of category rowth rea 1, where growth is related to planned infrastructure expansion, public service capacity, and fiscal considerations, are located directly adjacent to the pecific Plan rea. reas of category rowth rea 2 (needing more significant infrastructure improvements) near the Plan rea are located north of Highway 180. Development reas he eneral Plan identifies three Development reas that propose future Complete eighborhoods, which are neighborhoods that connect housing, jobs, retail, recreation, and services (see Figure 3.4). he outhwest Development rea, shown as purple in the figure, includes the entire outhwest pecific Plan rea, as well as adjacent County land within the phere of Influence. he vision for this area is new medium and medium low density residential development to neighbor existing residential areas. ew development is anticipated to be served by local streets, centered by parks, multi family housing, townhomes, and schools to build a network of Complete eighborhoods. ubsequent Projects ccording to the eneral Plan, for growth areas and/or large infill areas outside of the Downtown Planning rea, subsequent pecific Plans or Concept Plans are anticipated to refine more discreet land use and transportation design integration and intensity with necessary public facilities, maintenance, and services financing. he outhwest Fresno pecific Plan is one of the first of these follow on planning PLCK 3-5

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Figure 3.3 rowth reas Identified in the eneral Plan Figure 3.4 Development reas Identified in the eneral Plan 3-6 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX efforts. he subsequent projects identified by the eneral Plan are described for CQ purposes in the I. It is anticipated by the eneral Plan that these subsequent pecific Plans will include preparation of design guidelines and standards, and infrastructure financing programs. f 17 subsequent projects identified for development in the eneral Plan and quantified in the aster I, three of the projects are located within the Plan rea (see Figure 3.5). For these areas, the I specifically indicates the acreage, dwelling units, and building square feet for a variety of uses including housing, commercial, and open space. he projects that have some portion located in the Plan rea are (1) California venue and Kearney Boulevard eighborhood rea; (2) LK Church egional Center; and (3) outh of Church eighborhoods. able 3.1 summarizes the program development for these three subsequent projects, which includes land inside and outside of the pecific Plan rea. Because the development program also includes land outside of the pecific Plan rea, it should not be interpreted as an accurate depiction of future development within the pecific Plan rea. Figure 3.5 ubsequent Project reas Identified in the eneral Plan I CLIFI U IHBHD PL (2008) he California venue eighborhood Plan builds upon the 2003 est Fresno Community Vision Plan and focuses on future growth, development, and investment in est Fresno, particularly around California and alnut venues. esidents, landowners, and Fresno Housing uthority and City staff participated in three community workshops to develop an overall vision for the plan: to create a revitalized and wellconnected neighborhood realized by public and private investment. he plan s implementation recommendations are grouped into four categories: continuing community engagement, private PLCK 3-7

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX BL 3.1 UBQU PJC LD U ubsequent Project rea/land Use cres otal Dwelling Units otal Building quare Feet California venue and Kearney Boulevard eighborhood rea 1,363 ingle Family esidential 2,828 ultiple Family esidential 1,238 ixed Use 817 Commercial 706,291 mployment 337,278 pen pace 128 Public Facility 31 LK Church egional Center 138 ingle Family esidential 143 ultiple Family esidential 968 Commercial 544,079 pen pace 19 outh of Church eighborhoods 2,109 ingle Family esidential 1,634 ultiple Family esidential 4,854 Commercial 455,788 mployment 5,828,356 pen pace 219 Public Facility 66 ource: Fresno eneral Plan, 2014. development, public agency development, and public investment. Under private development, the plan provides Design uidelines for developers and recommends specific land use changes such as mixed uses and higher density along California venue, green buffers between residential and industrial uses, and the designation of an activity center. Under public agency development, the plan identifies four catalyst projects that would transform the neighborhood and bring private development to the area. Under public investment, the plan recommends specific street, streetscape, pedestrian, and bicycle improvements as well as recreational and public facility improvements. 3-8 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX DI CUI PL (1977) he dison Community Plan was adopted by the Fresno City Council on ay 10, 1977. he plan primarily focuses on the underutilized portion of the planning area, which is generally located to the west of olden tate Boulevard and south of est Belmont venue, and bounded on the north and east by large industrial concentrations and on the south and west by agricultural areas. Historically, the Plan rea suffered from ethnically discriminatory deed restrictions, which were also practiced outside the Plan rea. iven its age, the dison Community Plan may not seem as relevant. urprisingly, some conditions in the area have not changed. ver the years, the ethnic composition has varied; however, the segregation of cultural groups in the Plan rea from other parts of the city continued. iven the discrepancies in physical condition to socio economic development in the area, the dison Community Plan aimed to stimulate the long term balanced growth of the community based on three objectives: 1. o stimulate growth in the dison Community by improving the quality of the environment and the strategic provision of public facilities improvements. 2. o provide housing in the dison Community to accommodate the housing needs of a broad range of socio economic groups though both new development and rehabilitation. 3. o stimulate an increase of income level throughout the dison Community through programs of economic and employment development. o meet these objectives, the dison Community Plan establishes eight major proposals. f these, six address land use and/or urban design concerns. Key areas for change include the intersection of California and Fresno alnut venue for a new community center area and expanded local commercial services, lm venue for land use, aesthetic, and economic improvements, and the northern section of Fresno treet from the proposed community center for centralized office and professional services. ther areas recommended for change identified in the plan s elements include the intersection of B treet and Ventura venue for senior facilities and the intersection of B and tanislaus treets for more commercial services. Community Center. erving as the focal point of the plan, the Community Center creates the identity of the plan area where local activities and both private and public uses occur. Focused at the intersection of California venue and Fresno alnut venue, the Community Center encourages uses such as public facilities, park and recreational facilities, greenways, and commercial and development. Urban rowth anagement Process. he plan applies the Urban rowth anagement (U) Process, used for evaluating development proposals, on the fringe of the plan area. he U process, which is guided by a set of specific urban service delivery policies, establishes the rules by which City services should be delivered to new development. Development of Housing. he plan intends to preserve the character of existing residential neighborhoods, which are made up of single family residential units. verall, medium density housing makes up most of the community within the Plan rea. Lowest density development is targeted along Kearney Boulevard, which is proposed to serve as an ornamental pleasure drive. PLCK 3-9

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Improving Commercial ervices. major proposal is the development of a community shopping center within the Community Center. he plan also encourages smaller, local serving commercial uses within modern buildings and commercial office uses along Fresno treet. pen pace ystem. he plan strongly encourages the preservation of valuable agricultural land and the development of an urban open space system including regional recreation facility, park, neighborhood park, and recreational facilities, mini parks and greenways, and scenic drive. Improving ransportation. he plan prioritizes transit improvements, in terms of level and headway. In addition, it also encourages improvements to major and local streets during redevelopment and new development opportunities. 3.2.2 PL UD D IHBHD CUI PL he City is in the final stages of drafting the Downtown eighborhoods Community Plan, which acts as a guide to revitalizing Downtown Fresno and its surrounding seven principal subareas. Currently, the Downtown and its surrounding neighborhoods have historically experienced disinvestment and high vacancy rates, which have negatively affected the entire city. he development of the plan involved an extensive public process, including a week long design workshop and hearings with the Community dvisory Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. he plan describes the community s visionary goals for the plan area to reestablish the Downtown as the heart of Fresno and transform the subareas according to their unique identities. he plan recommends specific goals, policies, and actions for a large range of topics, including urban form and land use, transportation, open spaces and streetscape, infrastructure and natural resources, historic and cultural resources, health and wellness. hese include prioritizing the rehabilitation of single family houses to be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood character, redesigning existing corridors to be at a human scale, relocating industrial uses that act as a nuisance, and providing more local services in the form of supermarkets, retail, and banks. he Downtown eighborhoods Community Plan is expected to be adopted in 2016. he specific regulations for residential areas abutting the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea are outlined in the Downtown Development Code on the following pages. D DVLP CD he Downtown Development Code (DDC) is a form based code and its purpose is to preserve the historic fabric of the area, while providing standards for infill and redevelopment. Its goal is to create a walkable, vibrant, and human scale built environment. he DDC communicates all of the substantive rules for zoning, land use and development standards for the property subject to the DDC within the Downtown Planning rea. he Downtown Development Code is expected to be adopted in 2016. hile the DDC does not apply to property within the Plan rea, the zones immediately neighbor properties in the north and northeast areas of the Plan rea. 3-10 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX CIID DVLP CD UPD he City is in the final stages of updating the Citywide Development Code, which will become Chapter 15 of the Fresno unicipal Code. he Development Code addresses development in all areas of the city outside of the Downtown and serves as a vehicle that helps implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the eneral Plan and other operative plans. It functions as a precise guide for the physical development of the City that is in concert with the arrangement of land uses identified in the eneral Plan. he Development Code provides direction on eleven categories of districts: Buffer District, esidential ingle Family Districts, esidential ulti Family Districts, ixed Use Districts, Commercial Districts, mployment Districts, Public and emi Public Districts, Planned Development District, irport nvirons verlay District, Bluff Protection verlay District, and xpressway rea verlay District. he Citywide Development Code Update is expected to be adopted in late 2015. he pecific Plan planning process will refer to these code modifications and community input. HIH D H CID CPL PL he City is currently working on a Complete treets Plan within the Plan rea (see Figure 3.6). he effort involves improving the infrastructure in the Highway and orth Corridor and addressing current conflicts between truck traffic and the area s neighborhoods and opportunities for pedestrian, bicycle, and open space amenities. he recommendations from the plan will be integrated into the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan. P BFILD L U CID he City is commencing a planning process for the lm venue Corridor, which falls primarily within the Plan rea, to address three brownfield sites which can serve as catalysts for redevelopment. he City intends to integrate this planning effort with the outhwest Fresno pecific Plan; however, it has a later start date and separate grant funding. UH F IDUIL CPIBILI D ZI D LCI PL his assessment addresses concerns about incompatible industrial and heavy commercial land uses and zoning in particularly south Fresno neighborhoods and their negative health and environmental impacts on the community. he goals of the project include identifying incompatible land uses and zoning with nearby residential land uses, making recommendations for rezoning and facilities which should be phased out or relocated, discussing appropriate locations for these uses, and identifying feasible mitigation measures and greening opportunities to reduce their negative impacts. PLCK 3-11

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX 3.3 XII CDII 3.3.1 UUDI LD U, UB DI D CX he pecific Plan rea is surrounded by three highways to the north and east and County lands to the south and west. he Downtown eighborhoods Community Plan (DCP) area creates an arbitrary boundary along est, Kearney, horne, and Church avenues and as noted in the previous sections, has undergone its own planning and environmental review (see Figure 3.6). uch of the area within the DCP has similar character and land uses as those within the outhwest Plan rea, as described in the Downtown Development Code summary section above. 3.3.2 XII LD U D UB DI LD U D ZI xisting chools and chool Districts he Plan rea is made up of three school districts, but predominantly Fresno Unified in the northern half and ashington Unified in the southern half (see Figure 3.7). he Central Unified chool District is located to the west of the Plan rea, but overlaps a minimal number of existing residential properties within the Plan rea. he Plan rea consists of two elementary schools (unset and est Fresno), two middle schools (aston and est Fresno), and no high schools. he remaining schools (Bethune lementary and B Dubois) are charter schools. B Dubois Charter chool serves students from kindergarten to twelfth grade. utherford B. aston iddle chool, a new facility, is located at the corner of Church and Fig venues dison High chool is located outside, but very proximate, to the Plan rea. dison High chool is spatially located within two districts, but belongs to Fresno Unified chool District. ashington Union High chool serves the ashington Unified District, but is located outside of the Plan rea and approximately four miles south of the Plan rea s southern edge. ear the freeway intersection of Highway and Highway, the school district boundaries of Fresno Unified and ashington Unified alternate in the east west and north south directions. It is likely that many of this area s residents may live in close proximity of each other, but are assigned to different school districts, and thus attend different schools. xisting Community Facilities mong southwest Fresno s community facilities, churches are the most prevalent and can be found throughout the area (see Figure 3.8). he majority of these churches are located in Downtown and west of Highway, just outside of the Plan rea. imilarly, many other community facilities, including community centers, museums, and the regional medical center are located in Downtown. wo large churches of different faiths are located within the Plan rea: t. John Victory Fellowship Church and 3-12 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Fresno estside eventh Day dventist Church. number of parks are located in the Plan rea. It should be noted that Hyde and the egional ports Complex are located on top of landfills; there are also several retention ponds that serve as parks. However, there is no central urban center for the whole region. new health facility is located at the corner of lm and nnadale venues, which serves the southwest Fresno community. PLCK 3-13

CU Fresno 168 168 Fresno osemite International irport Fresno Chaffee Zoo 180 180 D IHBHD 180 Fresno Chandler xecutive irport FUL CID U H F L U H & H 0 0.25 Figure 3.6 0.5 iles urrounding Context ap xisting City Limits outhwest Fresno pecific Plan rea P Brown Field lm venue Corridor Plan rea xisting Unincorporated/ County Land Downtown eighborhoods Community Plan rea Highway & orth Corridor Complete treets Plan rea xisting s Fulton Corridor pecific Plan rea

II PH PICKFD PLU DC IP BLCK U L I L I LD IL LU PPP V BLI CI Carver KIK BU LIL Kirk lementary chool HLL L LL UD VD BL D FIVI LU L nchor cademy Charter chool King lementary chool I FI B BL LL IV PL L DD Lincoln lementary chool UIC H C HU CL FUI L DL U L I C IL IL H L Z PL CL F L U B HUH L / LF L C L V K PI I F LD I BL L L L Hyde U dison High chool D I I C U L CLIFI L I F I I VLCI DD KL J I D C Bethune lementary chool IP P H eilson F L C IL D H IP D Big Picture High chool B L U FU F D F C cel Fresno Charter High chool L K BLVD B U D I unset lementary chool JQUI LD DI U L I B D D Columbia lementary chool LU L D I D L I V IL HI BID Q L 180 D D P L DU Jefferson lementary chool D QU IL L D V L C H ILLII Lowell lementary chool L FU D B Pershing Continuation High chool D L/ PBL L DIVID IL UP K okomi lementary chool DD VLI CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P P utherford B. aston iddle chool H BD J egional ports Complex L VI DH FI U CL B Dubois Public Charter chool CL BDLL KILD KIH H B I V J V D V DL Ivy est Fresno iddle chool D est Fresno lementary chool est lementary chool H L 0.25mi 0 0.25mi Figure 3.7 chools and chool Districts ap City Limit XII L D L DIIC phere of Influence Fresno Unified Plan rea ashington Unified Central Unified chool

LL II PH U L LU V PPP KIK HLL LIL LL IV L VD BL D UD LU IL unset Community Center H KIH BD CL BDLL J CL L DH VI Fresno estside eventh-day dventist Church FI LD HU H B I V V D FUI IP BLCK Fresno C Local Conservation Corps BLI V KILD I BL Fresno C arly Head tart Health Care FIVI DL L IL PLU DC H IL PICKFD I C B DD UIC PL IL CI L CL HUH U Frank H Ball Community Center BU Lao Dhamma acca emple C U CL Boys & irls Club of Fresno Hyde L L F B D I H L U C / L K Z PL V L L LF L L LD PI Fresno C County Detention Facility I I F BL Q L P I U I J L FU F IP C F L C CLIFI L I F I DD KL I VLCI D C I J eilson I H t. John Victory Fellowship Church unset Community Center L D H olden Cross Health Care IP D B L U K BLVD L F D JQUI I B eux Home usem V D LU D U U L I B I D L LD DI D CP ehab ecovery Home D P Fink-hite eighborhood Center HI BID Veterans emorial useum rt méricas useum IL Dickey Playground L 180 D L DU H D D QU IL L D V L C L FU D B he useum ssisted Living Facility ILLII DIVID IL L I L/ PBL L outh Leadership Institute Community egional edical Center Dickey outh Dev. Center UP K VLI pirit of oman CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P P DL lm Community Health Center FI U estcare Foundation egional ports Complex ary lla Brown Community Center D H L 0.25mi 0 0.25mi Figure 3.8 Community Facilities ap City Limit XII CUI FCILII phere of Influence Church Hospital Public or Quasi-public Facility Plan rea Community ctivity Center edical Center s Convalescent Hospital eighborhood Center

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX xisting and Planned Land Use s depicted in Figure 3.9, land within the Plan rea is not clearly organized into distinct uses or patterns. Instead, there is a mixture of industrial, agricultural, commercial, and residential land uses throughout the Plan rea. Properties located at the eastern end of the Plan rea carry over the largely residential land use pattern found in Downtown, west of Highway. he pattern transitions into agricultural uses towards the western end of the Plan rea, closer to land outside the city limits within the City s phere of Influence and County owned land. Pockets of commercial uses are scattered through the Plan rea. Industrial uses, such as Foster Poultry Farms and Cargill, are located immediately adjacent to, or enclosed by, residential neighborhoods, which have led to incompatible uses and noise and air quality concerns. dditionally, there are vacant lands across the Plan rea. he recently updated eneral Plan devotes much attention to the Plan rea and calls for a more cohesive land use pattern (see Figure 3.10). he central theme for the Plan rea is to achieve what the eneral Plan defines as Complete eighborhoods; in essence, neighborhoods that are self sufficient, interconnected, and walkable. Planned land uses are envisioned to support new medium and medium lowdensity residential development adjacent to existing residential uses. ew development is anticipated to be infill, served by local streets, centered by parks, multi family housing, townhomes, and schools in hopes of building a network of Complete eighborhoods. ajor streets such as California venue are intended to support B in the future and include Complete treet systems that will accommodate ransit Villages along them. verall, the planned land use designations center on two key ideas: 1) create unique, self sustaining neighborhoods that provide residents with day to day services, and 2) create strong commercial arteries with a healthy street network that feeds into neighborhoods. xisting Zoning lm Community Health Center is a new asset in the southwest Fresno community Based on the City s Land Use Planning and Zoning Chapter of the unicipal Code (Chapter 12), the Plan rea falls within zoning districts in the residential, commercial, industrial, and open space land use categories. he following section provides a brief description of the specific zoning districts within each of these major land use categories (see Figure 3.11). It should be noted that Fresno s zoning will be updated through the adoption of the new Development Code in late 2015. PLCK 3-17

PH II PICKFD DC IP BLCK L U I L BL DD LD LU PPP V IV L KIK LIL HLL LL FIVI VD BL D LU Carver IL BLI BU FI L B I HU LL FUI C C UD DL IL CL IL PLU H IL CI CL HUH L L LF LD F U U U B I L Hyde C / K H L BL L Z L V UIC PL PL L D I I I I I F C U Q P L P C L U IP L KL CLIFI L I F I L DD B I VLCI D J C I P H eilson F L C IL D H IP D F F K BLVD B DL I L D LU FU D D B U JQUI LD DI L I U L D D I D V IL HI BID L 180 D ILLII L DU V L C L FU D B H D D QU IL L D L I L/ PBL L DIVID IL UP K DD VLI CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P P H BD J egional ports Complex L DH VI FI U CL CL BDLL KILD KIH H B I V J V D V DL Ivy D H L Plan rea 0.25mi 0 phere of Influence City Limit 0.25mi Figure 3.9 xisting Land Use ap IDIL obile Home CCIL eighborhood/eighborhood Center IDUIL Light Community ervices/institutional griculture Low Density Community/eighborhood Limited edium-low Density Heavy/egional edium Density ffice Utility edium-high Density Professional ervices ffice ing High Density Heavy chool pen pace/ irport Vacant

PH II IP BLCK U L B I L BL LD LU IL V PPP KIK HLL LIL LL IV FIVI KIH P BD H J H& H& BDLL DH L PB FI U H& H& VI HP PB VD BL D LU KILD IL Carver PB UIC L BLI CL PL L/ PBL L PICKFD DC PLU H I FI LL HU DD BU V D CL C FUI L UD CI DL L C L IL IL U F CL U HUH H L B LF Z PL LD L BL L C L / L K CL egional ports Complex V V H B I V J Q P P L L BP C FU BP PB L I PI I F P CP BP U L Hyde I L B P CX P& F L C BP U PB I C P D I CX U CX IP CLIFI L I F I CX DD CX I VLCI D KL C J eilson P I CX H IL D C P PB P H IP D C PB F K BLVD P I LD PB L F D JQUI B CP BP BP D LU U L I D V D PB P U L P D BP L I BP D I D CX IL B HI BID D L 180 PB L DU ILLII D QU IL L D L FU D B H D V L C UP K DIVID IL BP DD VLI CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P C DI P DL Ivy C P PB P BP D BP BP H L Plan rea 0.25mi 0 phere of Influence City Limit 0.25mi Figure 3.10 Planned Land Use ap IDIL PL ffice Low Density (1-3.5 du/ac) edium-low Density (3.5-6 du/ac) edium Density (5-12 du/ac) edium-high Density (12-16 du/ac) Urban eighborhood (16-30 du/ac) High Density (30-45 du/ac) BP Business Light Heavy CCIL C H& Highway & uto IXD U CX PUBLIC FCILII Public/Quasi-Public Facility Community Corridor/Center ixed Use lementary chool iddle chool irport Church HP Hospital C P& eighborhood Center P& tation ater echarge Basin P PC P P eighoborhood CP Community P egional PB Ponding Basin

II PH IP U CL L L LD C- C- DH H C-P DL -3 C-6 Ivy - L - FI U -2 PLI C-6 VI -5 IL KIK LIL HLL -2 KIH LU PPP V IV UIC LL UP FIVI LU HU UD CI C L J CL - -1 - - PLI -1 C-6-1 - BD PLI -1 C-1 VD BL Carver D -2 - -3-1 PLI IL -1 - BLI BU C-1-2 I -1 I BL LL KILD B DD CL L BLCK L/ PBL L PICKFD PLU DC L H C FI U V D U I FUI C H L L L DL IL F Z PL IL L I F L B CL L HUH L I PI / K BDLL K PL C V LF L BL Q P FU D F U C-2 egional ports Complex L H B I V -2-20 J -1 - V -1 IP C C- CLIFI -1 D -1 C-2-1 I U -3 L -1-1 P -1 F L C -1-1 Hyde -1-1 B L I -1-1 -3-1 -3-3 -1-1 -1 U-1-1 -3-1 -1 I C- DD L I F I -1 D C C-6 J eilson KL IL -1 H L -2- -1-CVLCI -1-C -1-C I -5 - D -1-1 -1 H -2 V IP D -5-1-B - F P -2-1 -5-1 -1-C C-6-1-C -1- LD K BLVD L I -5 D H D B -1-1 C JQUI D LU U B D L I L I U L -1-B D I D - V IL -1 - -1-1-C HI BID D V L C L FU D B 180-1 -1 L DU ILLII D QU IL L D - DI D H C-6 C- LD DIVID IL -1 C-6 DD VLI CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P C- -1 P -3 - -1-1-C -1-1 H PLI D -1 - -1-C C-6 - C-2 L - Plan rea 0.25mi 0 phere of Influence City Limit 0.25mi Figure 3.11 xisting Zoning ap IDIL CCIL -20 xclusive wenty-cre gricultural -2- Low-Density ultiple Family esidential -P esidential and Professional ffice District. -5 xclusive Five-cre gricultural -2 Low Density ultiple Family esidential C-P dministrative and Professional ffice District - ingle Family esidential-gricultural -3 edium Density ultiple Family esidential C-1 eighborhood hopping Center District -1- ingle Family esidential IDUIL C-2 Community hopping Center District -1-B ingle Family esidential C- Commercial and Light anufacturing District -1-C ingle Family esidential -1 Light anufacturing District C-5 eneral Commercial District C-6 Heavy Commercial District -1 ingle Family esidential -3 (Heavy Industrial) Heavy Industrial District P ff-treet ing District P PC pen pace Conservation District H plit

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX esidential 1. Districts 20 xclusive wenty cre gricultural District and 5 5 xclusive Five cre gricultural District. hese districts are intended exclusively for agriculture and for those uses which are necessary for agricultural operation. hese districts have been created to protect the general welfare of the agricultural community from encroachments of non regulated agricultural uses which by their nature would be injurious to the physical and economic well being of the agricultural districts. ith the exception of non dwelling structures such as windmills, silos, water tanks and other accessory farm buildings, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. on farm accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 2. ingle Family esidential gricultural District. his District is intended to provide for the development of single family residential estate homes in a semi rural environment. Lots in this District are required to be a minimum of 36,000 square feet, and cannot house more than one dwelling unit. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet and accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 3. 1 ingle Family esidential District. his District is intended to provide for the development of single family residential homes at urban standards. Lots in this District are required to be a minimum of 20,000 square feet, and cannot house more than one dwelling unit. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet and accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 4. 1 B ingle Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of single family residential homes. Lots in this District are required to be a minimum of 12,500 square feet, and cannot house more than one dwelling unit. enerally, building height cannot exceed 35 feet and accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 5. 1 C ingle Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of single family residential homes. Lots in this District are required to be a minimum of 9,000 square feet, and cannot house more than one dwelling unit. enerally, building height cannot exceed 35 feet and accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 6. 1. ingle Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of single family residential homes. Lots in this District are required to be a minimum of 6,000 square feet, and cannot house more than one dwelling unit. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet and accessory building heights cannot exceed one story or 12 feet. 7. 2 Low Density ultiple Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of low density multi family residential structures. ite planning and design must account for adequate air, light, privacy, safety, and insulation between buildings. Lots in this District must be a minimum of 6,000 square feet. enerally, building height cannot exceed 35 feet and accessory building height is not to exceed one story or 12 feet. 8. 2 Low Density ultiple Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of low density multi family residential structures. ite planning and design must account for adequate air, light, privacy, safety, and insulation between buildings. Lots in this District must be a minimum of 6,600 square feet. enerally, building height cannot exceed 35 feet and accessory building heights are not to exceed one story or 12 feet. PLCK 3-21

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX 9. 3 edium Density ultiple Family esidential District. his District is intended to allow development of medium density multi family residential structures. Lots in this District must be a minimum of 7,500 square feet. enerally, building height is not to exceed 40 feet. Commercial 1. P esidential and Professional ffice District. his District is intended to serve as a transition district between residential neighborhoods and commercial development. enerally, building height is not to exceed 30 feet. 2. C P dministrative and Professional ffice District. his District is intended to provide for the development of an integrated professional district. he District also permits other uses, such as residential and commercial mixed use projects, that support the District s professional office use. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 3. C 1 eighborhood hopping Center District. his District is intended to serve as a planned unified shopping center for a neighborhood. Development is expected to be in concert with the residential pattern, avoiding any architectural and traffic conflicts. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 4. C 2 Community hopping Center District. his District is intended to serve as a shopping center for a community. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 5. C 5 eneral Commercial District. his District is intended to serve as sites for the many lighter uses in the commercial classifications which are located in existing built up areas too far scattered to perform the function of a compact neighborhood or community shopping center. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 6. C 6 Heavy Commercial District. his District is intended to serve as sites for the many heavier uses in the Commercial classifications which are located in existing built up areas too far scattered to perform the functions of the community or regional compact shopping centers. enerally, building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 7. P ff treet ing District. his District is intended to provide for permanent parking areas. enerally, parking building/structure height is not to exceed 60 feet. Industrial 1. C Commercial and Light anufacturing District. his District is intended to provide for retail and wholesale sales, light manufacturing and warehousing, distributing and storage, as well as foster a relationship between warehousing, distribution, and retail sales. enerally, buildings related to industrial uses cannot exceed 75 feet; building related to all other permitted, non industrial uses cannot exceed 60 feet. 2. 1 Light anufacturing District. his District is intended to provide for the development of industrial uses, including fabrication, manufacturing, assembly, or processing of materials that are in already processed form. Industrial uses or activity cannot result in smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound, vibration, soot or lighting to any degree which might be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in either this or any other district. enerally, building height in this District is not to exceed 60 feet. 3-22 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX 3. 3 (Heavy Industrial) Heavy Industrial District. his District is intended to provide for the establishment of industrial uses essential to the development of a balanced economic base. enerally, building height in this District is not to exceed 60 feet. pen pace 1. pen pace Conservation District. his District is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in the community and to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the people by limiting developments in areas where police and fire protection, protection against flooding by storm water and dangers from excessive erosion are not possible without excessive costs to the community. Building or structure height in this District cannot exceed one story or 35 feet, with the exception of public service structures, or buildings or structures that the Community Development Director determines are necessary for reasonable operation of permitted uses. UB DI CX xisting Built Character Initially agricultural land, southwest Fresno has gradually transitioned to house more residential, industrial and commercial uses sporadically. s a result, the built character of the housing, community buildings, and work places range in character and conditions. For the most part, they respond to a very suburban character with large areas of parking and significant setbacks. treetscape any of the major streets in the Plan rea (e.g., California, Fig, and Church venues) were designed and built to accommodate transportation of industrial and agricultural products. Because southwest Fresno was predominantly an area of farming, the roads allowed trucks to pass through and transport materials. Later on, large trucking businesses were introduced to the eastern side of the area. hese streets cut through most of the established neighborhoods, with posted speeds of 45 PH, and lead to agricultural areas. ost of the other local streets are also wide, and for the most part, provide on street parking for the community. idewalks are narrow and offer little to no shade. In other cases, sidewalks are used as on street parking for residents, or are nonexistent. xisting streetscape is not ideal on many streets like in this residential neighborhood rchitecture ost of the buildings in the Plan rea have been built between the 1950s and the 10s. he prevalent architectural character for single family homes is merican vernacular, with altered Craftsman bungalows, modest inimal raditional, id Century odern, and contemporary tract homes, and mostly consists of one story housing. oward the center of the Plan rea, there are a few examples of older homes, which have been remodeled over time and thus lost their character. PLCK 3-23

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX Landscape and atural Character In general, there is a lack of tree cover on the streets that run north south in the Plan rea. here is better landscaping on streets that run east west like Kearney Boulevard, California venue, and smaller residential streets. he topography of the entire Plan rea is flat, excluding Hyde. Projects Underway In addition to the ongoing planning efforts in the Highway and orth Corridor plan area and the potential catalyst sites noted within the lm venue plan area, there have been a number of permits for entitlement issued within Hyde provides steeper topography in an otherwise flat landscape the outhwest Plan rea over the last five years. ne site in particular, located on the northwest corner of Jensen venue and Fig venue, which sits just outside the outhwest pecific Plan rea has been identified as a potential site for retail development. 3.4 U F K FIDI 3.4.1 IU Disparate Land Uses. he Plan rea is made up of a variety of land uses that closely neighbor each other. any pockets of residential land uses are adjacent to vacant land, agriculture, and/or industrial uses. pen space/park uses are lacking within the Plan rea with the exception of the large egional ports Complex. However, this facility is located further from residential uses and lacks connection. Inconsistent ree Coverage. here is more adequate tree coverage along streets that run east west and less on streets that run north south. ature trees can generally be found on older residential streets, while young trees are found along arterials such as parts of Kearney Boulevard and California venue. ature trees provide tree coverage in residential neighborhoods Incompatible Industrial Uses. he cluster of industrial land uses in close proximity to established neighborhoods has caused health and compatibility concerns. Discussions are underway about the possibility of relocating industrial facilities outside of the Plan rea. 3-24 UU 2015

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX 3.4.2 PPUII Distinct Character Zones. lthough the Plan rea varies in character, the southwest can be categorized into four loose zones: (1) gricultural esidential; (2) Historic Core; (3) ixed use; and (4) ecreation (see Figure 3.12). urrounding uses from the broader region influence the character of these zones. gricultural land uses in the northwest corner of the Plan rea create a mix of residential housing and farmland. here are more established residential neighborhoods in the Historic Core than the other quadrants because of the quadrant s clear proximity to Downtown. he ixed use zone is home to a wide range of uses and could be a prime opportunity for new regional retail and employment to better utilize large parcels with industrial buildings and warehouses. he ecreation zone provides the City and the southwest area much needed recreational fields. ach zone is described in more detail as follows. gricultural esidential Zone. he gricultural esidential zone is defined by the historic Kearny venue promenade, the established residential neighborhood, and an organic farm that interfaces with the surrounding uses along the street edge. he zone is bisected by three 40 acre sites, also known as ission anch, that run north south. hese parcels are commonly referred to as ission anch and are currently used for almond farming, and may be developed into new housing in the future. o the west of the parcels is a new high end residential community and to the east, established residential communities. Kearney Boulevard, a picturesque, tree lined, and historic avenue, runs east west through the center of the quadrant. here are views along Kearney Boulevard as well as to the north at the intersection of arks venue and Highway 180. hese physical features bring opportunities for potential retail and residential development along hitesbridge venue to take advantage of the freeway access, views, and picturesque quality of the quadrant. Historic Core Zone. he Historic Core zone is made up of mostly residential neighborhoods organized in a grid style pattern. Both Kearney Boulevard and Fresno Chandler xecutive, a small historic airport, frame the north edge of the quadrant. here are views from Hyde toward Kearney Boulevard and Downtown. ithin the residential neighborhoods, there are some undeveloped parcels that could be opportunities for potential infill development. iven the zone s proximity to and influence from Downtown, there are many opportunities for revitalization. any of these potential sites are centralized around Hyde to take advantage of the existing views. Large parcels dedicated to farming are located in the gricultural esidential Zone Fresno Chandler xecutive irport is a small historic airport adjacent to the Historic Core Zone PLCK 3-25

U L I L BL DD IL LU PPP V KIK HLL LIL LL VD BL D L LU IL BLI BU FIVI LD IV II PH PLU DC H IP BLCK L B I L FI LL HU C FUI ew chools UD CL C L DL CI IL L IL U CL U C HUH B LF H L LD F / L L Z PL V L L K L UIC PL L I BL U PI I F PICKFD Q L C FU P I D I 2 U IP I F L C C U CLIFI L I F I KL I VLCI D J C I IL H DD L B D H D IP D D P F F 1 B K BLVD Historic treet L D I LU JQUI LD DI U L U L I D D Historic irport D D B I D V IL HI BID L 180 D ILLII L DU V L C L FU D B H D D QU IL L D L I L/ PBL L DIVID IL UP K DD VLI CL L /V L VL D PL F/PL L F HU K FUI HUBLD PCIFIC P P J CL DH L 3 FI U 4 CL L U C I H BD KIH KILD BDLL J H B I V U V D V VI ew Clinic DL L BX PL D H L 0.25mi 0 0.25mi Figure 3.12 pportunities ap City Limit UH Z phere of Influence 1 gricultural esidential Plan rea 2 Historic Core /pen pace 3 ixed-use Important menities 4 ecreation Views Potential etail/development ite (ignificant) ree Coverage (ignificant) stablished esidential reas Intersections (Highway ff-ramps) Influences

UH F PCIFIC PL - XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX ixed use Zone. he ixed use zone is characterized by a variety of land uses, including residential, industrial, agricultural, and vacant parcels. stablished residential housing runs north south of the zone. o the zone s west is farmland and to its east are warehouses. Highway also runs along the eastern edge of the quadrant and provides two highway intersection off ramps to the area that provide close accessibility to regional employment. iven the zone s proximity to large box employment center to the east, rural communities to the south of the city limits, as well as the easy highway access, it lm venue provides long views to Downtown Fresno has significant opportunity for regional retail. Potential development sites are located along lm venue between the residential and industrial uses and also clustered around the southern Highway intersection. ecreation Zone. he ecreation zone is the smallest of the four zones. It is separated from the rest of the zones and City property and is surrounded by large parcels of farmland on the south, west, and east sides and smaller parcels of farmland to the north and northwest. he zone is mainly made up of the egional ports Complex facility and large vast fields. he curved streets surrounding the recreation facility are tree lined. t the north edge of the zone, there are many long views to downtown. here are opportunities to better connect the zone to the surrounding neighborhoods with pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit service. Fresno s egional ports Complex is surrounded by vast fields PLCK 3-27

UH F PCIFIC PL XII CDII PFIL CI F F LD U, UB DI, & PLI CX 3-28 UU 2015