Translation To Predicate Logic, 8.1

Similar documents
10.4 Traditional Subject Predicate Propositions

Predicate Logic. Example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal.

How To Understand The Logic Of Ibsen'S Play \"Ibsen\"

If an English sentence is ambiguous, it may allow for more than one adequate transcription.

Invalidity in Predicate Logic

1.5. Factorisation. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style

PET : ATK. Illustration. Model. Year. Restrictions. Page: 001 KAT 97. et_bt1.frm. Pos Part Number Description Remark Qty Model

Propositional Logic. A proposition is a declarative sentence (a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both.

Total Units: Total Units: 31-42

Rules of Inference Friday, January 18, 2013 Chittu Tripathy Lecture 05

Chapter 1. Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE

The Syntax of Predicate Logic

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

Making Friends at College

CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK

CMS SPECIALTY CODES/HEALTHCARE PROVIDER TAXONOMY CROSSWALK. This table reflects Medicare Specialty Codes as of April 1, 2003.

How To Understand The Theory Of Algebraic Functions

Military Crosswalk - Texas State Auditor's Office

Translation Guide. Not both P and Q ~(P Q) Not either P or Q (neither/nor)

155-Counselor, Addiction 177-Counselor, Licensed Associate Professional (LAPC) 425-Social Worker (LSW) 212-Oral Maxillofacial Surgery

A Note to Parents. 1. As you study the list, vary the order of the words.

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

Predicate Logic Review

Taxonomy Code Mapping Professional Providers

How To Treat A Medical Condition

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Society tells us otherwise. Our broke family and friends tell us otherwise.

1 Shapes of Cubic Functions

ForwardHealth-Required Taxonomy Codes

no taxonomy code 339-Lodging Providers 393-Provide Meals 357-Community/Behavioral Health 060-Early Intervention; Provider Agency

WARM UP EXERCSE. 2-1 Polynomials and Rational Functions

College Algebra - MAT 161 Page: 1 Copyright 2009 Killoran

CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 2012

Inner Product Spaces

I Wash My Hands. I wash my hands before I eat I wash my hands to get them clean And after touching sticky things I wash my hands

California Treasures High-Frequency Words Scope and Sequence K-3

1.7. Partial Fractions Rational Functions and Partial Fractions. A rational function is a quotient of two polynomials: R(x) = P (x) Q(x).

Deductive reasoning is the application of a general statement to a specific instance.

The Convolution Operation

Finding New Opportunities with Predictive Analytics. Stephanie Banfield 2013 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Session 4 (Life)

it is easy to see that α = a

A Short Course in Logic Example 8

PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS

ESL QUESTION 62 ANSWER 8 LUCKY CARDS

1. First-order Ordinary Differential Equations

1. Symbolize the following sentences in PL using the given symbolization key.

Polynomial Invariants

Polynomials. Key Terms. quadratic equation parabola conjugates trinomial. polynomial coefficient degree monomial binomial GCF

Logic and Reasoning Practice Final Exam Spring Section Number

Kino, Juana and Coyotito

Graphic Designing with Transformed Functions

1 Mathematical Models of Cost, Revenue and Profit

Chapter 7. Functions and onto. 7.1 Functions

Gödel s Ontological Proof of the Existence of God

More Quadratic Equations

Analyzing Piecewise Functions

FACTORING TRINOMIALS IN THE FORM OF ax 2 + bx + c

Section 3.2 Polynomial Functions and Their Graphs

MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

First Grade Spelling 3-1. First Grade Spelling. 1. an 2. at 3. can 4. cat 5. had 6. man 7. I 8. and 9. the 10. a. Dictation Sentences:

6.1 Add & Subtract Polynomial Expression & Functions

Lesson 4 Parts of Speech: Verbs

Grammar Unit: Pronouns

Factoring Quadratic Expressions

Christmas in black and white it s plain as day and night Look through God s Word and you ll see Christmas in black and white.

Lecture 8: Resolution theorem-proving

Math 432 HW 2.5 Solutions

tegrals as General & Particular Solutions

Storytelling + young learners + limited vocabulary?

My favourite animal is the cheetah. It lives in Africa in the savannah, It eats and gazel es. It is big and yel ow with black spots.

Building a Better Argument

Kant s deontological ethics

Predicate logic Proofs Artificial intelligence. Predicate logic. SET07106 Mathematics for Software Engineering

CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

Phonics. High Frequency Words P.008. Objective The student will read high frequency words.

Application. Outline. 3-1 Polynomial Functions 3-2 Finding Rational Zeros of. Polynomial. 3-3 Approximating Real Zeros of.

ALGEBRA REVIEW LEARNING SKILLS CENTER. Exponents & Radicals

A Brief Review of Elementary Ordinary Differential Equations

Section 3.7. Rolle s Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem. Difference Equations to Differential Equations

3.2 The Factor Theorem and The Remainder Theorem

Learning Centre PARALLELISM

FIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.

MATH PROBLEMS, WITH SOLUTIONS

Syllogisms and Fallacies 101

[elo'quia. S 1 / 6. Please mark the correct answer with a X. Example: I must my homework this evening. X. Duration: 45 minutes.

Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2)

Definition: Suppose that two random variables, either continuous or discrete, X and Y have joint density

The Fox and the Crow

Introduction to Finite Fields (cont.)

1.4. Removing Brackets. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style

Limits and Continuity

(LMCS, p. 317) V.1. First Order Logic. This is the most powerful, most expressive logic that we will examine.

Transcription:

Philosophy 109, Modern Logic, Queens College Russell Marcus, Instructor email: philosophy@thatmarcusfamily.org website: http://philosophy.thatmarcusfamily.org Office phone: (718) 997-5287 Translation To Predicate Logic, 8.1 I. Introduction Consider the following argument: All philosophers are happy. Emily is a philosopher. So, Emily is happy. If we translate into propositional logic, the conclusion does not follow: P Q / R The conclusion follows logically, but not with propositional logic. Propositional Logic is insufficient to derive all logical consequences. We need a stronger logic, one that explores the logic inside the sentences. This is called predicate logic. In Propositional Logic, we have the following elements: Terms for statements, simple letters Five connectives Punctuation (brackets) In Predicate Logic, we have the following elements: Complex Terms for statements, made of objects and predicates Quantifiers The same five connectives as in propositional logic. The same punctuation as in propositional logic. II. Objects and Predicates We represent objects using lower case letters. a, b, c,...w stand for specific objects, and are called constants. x, y, z are used as variables. We represent predicates using capital letters. These stand for properties of the objects, and are placed in front of the object letters. Pa: means object a has property P, and is said P of a Pe: Emily is a philosopher He: Emily is happy III. Exercises A. Translate each sentence into predicate logic. 1. Alice is clever. 2. Bobby works hard. 3. Chuck plays tennis regularly. 4. Dan will see Erika on Tuesday at noon in the gym.

IV. Quantifiers Consider: All philosophers are happy. The subject of this sentence is not a specific philosopher, no specific object. Similarly for Something is made in the USA There is no a specific thing to which the sentence refers. For sentences like these, we use quantifiers. There are two quantifiers: 1) The existential quantifier: ( x). It is used with any of the following expressions: There exists an x, such that For some x There is an x For at least one x Something 2) The universal quantifier: (x). It is used with: For all x Everything Some terms, like anything, can indicate either quantifier, depending on the context: In If anything is missing, you ll be sorry, we use an existential quantifier. In Anything goes, we use a universal quantifier. Examples of simple translations using quantifiers: Something is made in the USA: ( x)ux Everything is made in the USA: (x)ux Nothing is made in the USA: (x) Ux or ( x)ux Note that all statements with quantifiers and negations can be translated in at least two different ways. Most sentences get translated as (at least) two predicates: One is used for the subject of the sentence. One is used for the attribute of the sentence. Universals tend to use conditionals (as main connective) to separate the subject from the attribute. Existentials usually use conjunctions between the subject predicate and the attribute predicate. More sample translations: All persons are mortal: (x)(px Mx) Some actors are vain: ( x)(ax Vx) Some gods aren t mortal: ( x)(gx Mx) No frogs are people: (x)(fx Px) or ( x)(fx Px) V. Exercises B. Translate each sentence into predicate logic. 1) All roads lead to Rome. (Rx, Lx) 2) Beasts eat their young. (Bx, Ex) 3) Everything worthwhile requires effort. (Wx, Rx) 4) Some jellybeans are black. (Jx, Bx) 5) Some jellybeans are not black.

VI. Scope and Binding Compare: (x)(px Qx) and (x)px Qx Every P is Q If everything is P, then x is Q The scope of the quantifier is whatever term follows immediately. If it s a bracket, then whatever is in the bracket is in the scope of the quantifier. If it s a negation, then everything negated is in the scope of the quantifier. Quantifiers bind every instance of their variable in its scope. So, in the first, the x in Qx is bound, but in the second, it is not. Examples of unbound terms (x)px Qx Qx is not in the scope of the quantifier, so is unbound. ( x)(px Qy) Qy is in the scope of the quantifier, but y is not the quantifier variable, so is unbound. VII. Many propositions contain more than two predicates Examples with more than one predicate in the subject part: Some wooden desks are uncomfortable: ( x)[(wx Dx) Ux] All wooden desks are uncomfortable: (x)[(wx Dx) Ux] Examples with more than one predicate in the attribute part: Many applicants are untrained or inexperienced: ( x)[ax (Ux Ix)] All applicants are untrained or inexperienced: (x)[ax ( Tx Ix)] Examples using only : Only men have been presidents: (x)(px Mx) That is, if it has been a president, it must have been a man, since all presidents have been men. Note that only inverts the antecedent and consequent. Only famous men have been presidents: (x)[(px Mx) Fx] or (x)[(px (Mx Fx)] Only intelligent students understand Kant: (x)[(sx Kx) Ix] VIII. Some sentences contain more than one quantifier If anything is damaged, then everyone in the house complains: Either all the gears are broken, or a cylinder is missing: ( x)dx (x)[(ix Px) Cx] (x)(gx Bx) ( x)(cx Mx) IX. Exercises C. Translate each sentence into predicate logic. 1) Some jellybeans are tasty. (Jx, Tx) 2) Some black jellybeans are tasty. (Jx, Bx, Tx) 3) No green jellybeans are tasty. (Gx, Jx, Tx) 4) Some politicians are wealthy and educated. (Px, Wx, Ex) 5) All wealthy politicians are electable. (Wx, Px, Ex) 6) If all jellybeans are black then no jellybeans are red. (Jx, Bx, Rx) 7) If everything is physical then there are no ghosts. (Px, Gx) 8) Some one walked the dog, but no one washed the dishes. (Px, Wx, Dx) 9) Everyone can go home only if all the work is done. (Px, Gx, Wx, Dx)

X. Exercises D. Translate each sentence into predicate logic. 1. All mice are purple. (Mx, Px) 2. No mice are purple. 3. Some mice are purple. 4. Some mice are not purple. 5. Snakes are reptiles. (Sx, Rx) 6. Snakes are not all poisonous. (Sx, Px) 7. Children are present. (Cx, Px) 8. Executives all have secretaries. (Ex, Sx) 9. Only executives have secretaries. 10. All that glitters is not gold. (Gx, Ax) 11. Nothing in the house escaped destruction. (Hx, Ex) 12. Blessed is he that considers the poor. (Bx, Cx) 13. Some students are intelligent and hard working. (Sx, Ix, Hx) 14. He that hates dissembles with his lips, and lays up deceit within him. (Hx, Dx, Lx) 15. Everything enjoyable is either illegal, immoral, or fattening. (Ex, Lx, Mx, Fx) 16. Some medicines are dangerous if taken in excessive amounts. (Mx, Dx, Tx) 17. Some medicines are dangerous only if taken in excessive amounts. 18. Victorian houses are attractive (Vx, Hx, Ax) 19. Slow children are at play. (Sx, Cx, Px) 20. Any horse that is gentle has been well-trained. (Hx, Gx, Wx) 21. Only well-trained horses are gentle. 22. Only gentle horses have been well-trained. 23. A knowledgeable, inexpensive mechanic is hard to find. (Kx, Ex, Mx, Hx) 24. Dogs and cats chase birds and squirrels. (Dx, Cx, Bx, Sx) 25. If all survivors are women, then some women are fortunate. (Sx, Wx, Fx) 26. Some, but not all, of us got away. (Ux, Gx) 27. If all ripe bananas are yellow, then some yellow things are ripe. (Rx, Bx, Yx) 28. If any employees are lazy and some positions have no future, then some employees will not be successful. (Ex, Lx, Px, Fx, Sx) 29. No coat is waterproof unless it has been specially treated. (Cx, Wx, Sx) 30. A professor is a good lecturer if and only if he is both well-informed and entertaining. (Px, Gx, Wx, Ex) XI. Solutions Answers to Exercises A: 1. Ca 2. Wb 3. Pc 4. Sd Answers to Exercises B: 1) (x)(rx Lx) 2) (x)(bx Ex) 3) (x)(wx Rx) 4) ( x)(jx Bx) 5) ( x)(jx Bx)

Answers to Exercises C: 1) ( x)(jx Tx) 2) ( x)[(bx Jx) Tx)] 3) (x)[(gx Jx) Tx] or ( x)[(gx Jx) Tx] 4) ( x)[px (Wx Ex)] 5) (x)[(wx Px) Ex] 6) (x)(jx Bx) (x)(jx Rx) or (x)(jx Bx) ( x)(jx Rx) 7) (x)px ( x)gx 8) ( x)(px Wx) ( x)(px Dx) 9) (x)(px Gx) (x)(wx Dx) Answers to Exercises D: 1. (x)(mx Px) 2. (x)(mx Px) 3. ( x)(mx Px) 4. ( x)(mx Px) 5. (x)(sx Rx) 6. (x)(sx Px) or ( x)(sx Px) 7. ( x)(cx Px) 8. (x)(ex Sx) 9. (x)(sx Ex) 10. (x)(gx Ax) 11. (x)(hx Ex) 12. (x)(cx Bx) 13. ( x)[sx (Ix Hx)] 14. (x)[hx (Dx Lx)] 15. (x){ex [( Lx Mx) Fx] 16. ( x)[mx (Tx Dx)] 17. ( x)[mx (Dx Tx)] 18. (x)[(hx Vx) Ax] 19. ( x)[(cx Sx) Px] 20. (x)[(hx Gx) Wx] 21. (x)[(hx Gx) Wx] 22. (x)[(hx Wx) Gx] 23. (x){[(kx Ex) Mx] Hx} 24. (x)[(dx Cx) (Bx Sx)] 25. (x)(sx Wx) ( x)(wx Fx) 26. ( x)(ux Gx) (x)(ux Gx) 27. (x)[(bx Rx) Yx] ( x)(yx Rx) 28. [( x)(ex Lx) ( x)(px Fx)] ( x)(ex Sx) 29. (x)[cx ( Wx Sx)] or (x)[cx ( Sx Wx)] or (x)[(cx Wx) Sx] or ( x)(cx Wx Sx) 30. (x){px [Gx (Wx Ex)]}