University of Houston. Accountability Report

Similar documents
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Accountability Report

Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Accountability Report

Sul Ross State University Rio Grande College. Accountability Report

University of Houston-Downtown. Accountability Report

Texas A&M University at Galveston. Accountability Report

Texas A&M University-Commerce. Accountability Report

College of Engineering - enrollment Requirements and Percentiles

The University of Texas at Austin. Accountability Report

The University of Texas at Austin. Accountability Report

Community Colleges Accountability Measures and Definitions

Community Colleges Accountability Measures

Alamo Community College - San Antonio College. Accountability Report

National Center for Education Statistics

National Center for Education Statistics

The University of Texas System. Accountability and Performance Report

National Center for Education Statistics

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

National Center for Education Statistics

National Center for Education Statistics

National Center for Education Statistics

Student Profile -Statistics on enrollment at University of Florida

National Center for Education Statistics

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

A Transparent Approach to Higher Education Accountability

National Center for Education Statistics

Texas Public Universities Data and Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report. IPEDS Cycle Updated October 2014

National Center for Education Statistics

12-month Enrollment

RANGER COLLEGE FACT BOOK

TWO-YEAR INSTITUTIONS ONLINE RESUME DEFINITIONS TWO-YEAR INSTITUTIONS ONLINE RESUME DEFINITIONS FOR LEGISLATORS AND OTHER POLICYMAKERS

Delaware College of Art and Design

A. General Information

12-Month Enrollment - The FTE & Network Marketing

Accountability and Performance Report

OFF-CAMPUS CAMPUS UWC OCP 1 TOTAL* UWC OCP 1 TOTAL In-State Resident

The Employment Status of Instructional Staff Members in Higher Education, Fall 2011

How To Know More About Walla Walla State College

UCCSN Master Plan - Accountability Report

Best Graduate Schools 2015 Statistical Survey of Graduate Programs of Education

12-month Enrollment

Best Graduate Schools 2014 Statistical Survey of Graduate Programs of Education

12-month Enrollment

2015 REPORT Performance & Accountability

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

COMPILED BY. Sarah Combs and Michelle Fugate Pederson

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12 month Enrollment

12-month Enrollment

School of Nursing Fact Book IV

State of Warren County Community College, NJ

Strategic Plan

12-month Enrollment Institution: State Fair Community College (179539) Overview screen

12-month Enrollment

Michigan Technological University College Portrait. The Huskies Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

How to Report Student Enrollment Over a 12-Month Period

Table of Contents. Peer Comparisons: Introduction. Total Enrollment Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender by Race and Citizenship Graduate Enrollment

! Of students graduating from Colorado high schools in 2000, 21.8 percent had Hispanic, Asian, Black or Native American parentage (Table 1).

HUMANITIES. 18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs - UT Dallas. PhD

MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN 2014 PERFORMANCE REPORT / April 2015

Student Demographics Table P.10 Academic Year Johnson County Community College Headcount and FTE

Eastern Illinois University Key Publication Facts

Report to the Texas Tech System Board of Regents M. Duane Nellis President, Texas Tech University

Accountability System Reports for Selected Success Measures Very Large Community College Districts Spring 2008

18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs 1

Voluntary Accountability Report

12-month Enrollment

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA REPORT ON EXPANDING ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH STATE-FUNDED DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Higher Education State Fact Book Louisiana Board of Regents NOTE: Data is subject to change Revised 05/13/2016

Texas A&M University. Prepared by Data and Research Services

Student Demographics Table P.10 Academic Year Cowley Community College Headcount & FTE Academic Year

California State University, Los Angeles College Portrait. The Cal State LA Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs

UT Dallas - 18 Characteristics of Texas Public Schools Program 1. Telecommunications Engineering, CIPcode

Examination of Four-Year Baccalaureate Completion Rates at Purdue University. April Enrollment Management Analysis and Reporting

Vision 2020 Strategic Plan Key Performance Indicators

12-month Enrollment

DALTON STATE COLLEGE COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW

National Center for Education Statistics

12-month Enrollment

The New Jersey College Student and Parent Consumer Report for The College of New Jersey

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board New Doctoral Degree Proposal

Oregon State University Strategic Plan for the 21st Century Performance Metrics

1. Number of Degrees Per Year Rolling three-year average of the number of degrees awarded per academic year. Academic Year Average Number of Degrees

Fact Book Compiled by the Office of Institutional Research

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT TEMPLATE

NAAB Annual Report -- Part I Statistical Report SECTION A. INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 1. Program Contact Information:

PERFORMANCE FUNDING STANDARDS, through

VCCS Report on High Performance Metrics Data for Achieve 2015 Goals within VCCS

UNM Fact Book

Program Director Survey: Distance Learning

IC Header Institution: University of Puerto Rico-Cayey (243151) User ID: P Overview

National Center for Education Statistics

18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs Developmental Education Administration - Doctor of Philosophy Sam Houston State University

The Broncho Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

Ohio 2013 Title II Report, State Program Information

Part Time. Part Time. Subtotal Time. Time. Criminal Justice

Transcription:

University of Houston Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 1 of 23

Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall headcount (unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 Institutional Gaps Target- Fall 2015 Gaps Completion Total* 32,123 40,914 42,704 32.9% 41,982 101.7% White 13,675 (42.6%) 11,855 (29.0%) 11,791 (27.6%) - 13.8% 13,014 90.6% African American 4,261 (13.3%) 4,567 (11.2%) 4,709 (11.0%) 10.5% 4,618 102.0% Hispanic 5,376 (16.7%) 10,994 (26.9%) 11,743 (27.5%) 118.4% 11,755 99.9% Asian 5,693 (17.7%) 8,215 (20.1%) 8,802 (20.6%) 54.6% International 2,390 (7.4%) 4,025 (9.8%) 4,119 (9.6%) 72.3% Other 728 (2.3%) 1,258 (3.1%) 1,540 (3.6%) 111.5% Flex Entry 0 16 48 N/A Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 For the second year a row, UH has achieved record enrollment - 42,704 students for fall 2015. In addition, the students enrolling in fall 2015 continue the multi-year trend of having higher average SAT scores than the previous year. UH has also been given the federal designations of Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) and Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institution (AANAPISI). These designations allow for expanded opportunities to apply for and receive grants that create educational opportunities and work to improve the educational outcomes for minority students. Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment 2. Fall semester credit hours (SCH) includes undergraduate(15), master's(12), doctoral(9), special-professional(12), and optometry(17). Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall 2015 Total FTSEs 24,659 33,217 34,685 40.7% State-Funded FTSEs 24,579 32,745 34,294 39.5% NOTE: The percentage change is based on the actual FTE numbers and may vary slightly from the calculation produced by the rounded numbers. Post-baccalaureate students are counted separately from master s for headcount enrollment and are counted with master s for FTE enrollment calculations. FTE enrollment at the University of Houston has increased by more than 40% since fall 2000. Furthermore, the percentage growth in FTE enrollment is greater than the percentage growth in headcount enrollment (33%). This suggests that students are averaging more courses per semester and that efforts by UH to encourage timely graduation are having a positive effect. Participation - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall 2015 3. First-time undergraduates from Texas top 10% and Texas top 11-25% Students in Texas top 10% 19.2% 28.9% 26.9% 7.7 Students in Texas top 11-25% N/A 26.9% 27.6% N/A 4. First-time entering applicants accepted 5. First-time accepted, enrolled 82.1% 62.8% 60.0% - 22.1 54.2% 37.0% 38.3% - 15.9 Accountability System, January 2016 2 of 23

Additional applicant data is available at: http://www.txhighereddata.org/appaccenrinfo FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2014 6. Racial and ethnic composition of Texas public high school graduates White 51.5% 34.7% 34.2% -17.3 African American 12.9% 12.9% 12.6% -0.3 Hispanic 32.1% 46.4% 46.8% 14.7 Asian 3.2% 4.0% 4.2% 1.0 Other 0.3% 2.1% 2.2% 1.9 UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges 7. UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges Fall UG Enrollment Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Change Fall 2015 UG Students 23,494 (100%) 31,734 (100%) 33,404 (100%) 0-12 hours 4,546 (19.3%) 5,526 (17.4%) 5,427 (16.2% ) - 3.1 13-24 hours 2,220 (9.4%) 3,092 (9.7%) 3,030 (9.1% ) - 0.3 25-29 hours 624 (2.7%) 921 (2.9%) 922 (2.8% ) 0.1 30-42 hours 1,404 (6.0%) 2,033 (6.4%) 2,136 (6.4% ) 0.4 43-59 hours 1,804 (7.7%) 2,941 (9.3%) 3,229 (9.7% ) 2.0 60-66 hours 791 (3.4%) 1,658 (5.2%) 1,823 (5.5% ) 2.1 67+ hours 3,304 (14.1%) 4,804 (15.1%) 5,028 (15.1% ) 1.0 All Students with SCH at TX 2-Yr college 14,693 (62.5%) 20,975 (66.1%) 21,595 (64.6% ) 2.1 Awarded Core 0 (0.0%) 814 (2.6%) 738 (2.2% ) 2.2 Associate Degree 1,208 (5.1%) 4,617 (14.5%) 5,572 (16.7% ) 11.6 For data about SCHs taken for dual credit by institution, go to http://www.txhighereddata.org/dualcreditdata. Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall 2015 8. Semester credit hours Total undergraduate semester credit hours 290,198 397,910 419,270 44.5% Total graduate semester credit hours 62,932 77,704 78,234 24.3% Percentage graduate SCH to total SCH 17.8 % 16.3 % 15.7% - 2.1 Undergraduate and graduate SCH have both grown significantly since Fall 2000. However, graduate enrollment has been outpaced by undergraduate student enrollment resulting in a decrease in the percentage of graduate SCH to total SCH. Accountability System, January 2016 3 of 23

Participation - Out-of-State Peers Out-of-state peer data is from the Fall 2014 IPEDS report and may not match accountability data because of differences in the source of the data. Accountability measures are primarily derived from institutional data sent to the CB for CBM reports. Data reported on this out-of-state peer link is obtained from the IPEDS system of institutional reporting to the federal government. Data differences may result from different reporting periods and different definitions for the data elements. Options Return to the Participation Page Download Excel Version Out-of-State Peer Measures and Definitions Headcount Enrollment Headcount enrolled for credit, disaggregated by race/ethnicity. University of Houston Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers CINCINNATI-MAIN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO SOUTH CAROLINA-COLUMBIA Total 40,914 27,844 27,261 35,313 27,969 32,971 White 11,855 10,762 16,363 24,903 11,211 24,351 African American 4,173 682 1,432 2,517 2,194 3,438 Hispanic 10,994 11,308 2,196 985 5,435 1,309 Asian 8,215 957 1,390 1,183 5,292 911 Other 5,677 4,135 5,880 5,725 3,837 2,962 Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment Full-time equivalent for the institution. The full-time equivalent of part-time enrollment is estimated by multiplying the part-time enrollment by factors that vary by control and level of institution and level of student. Total 34,163 23,056 23,447 29,696 25,018 30,445 Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - University of Houston Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. By Level, Age: Total 33,404 4,386 1,780 1,708 1,426 42,704 By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Age Group Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total Under 18 294 0 0 0 0 294 18 to 21 18,235 117 0 89 12 18,453 22 to 24 8,757 1,464 115 752 290 11,378 25 to 29 3,941 1,498 772 603 592 7,406 30 to 34 1,192 684 459 161 267 2,763 35 and over 985 623 434 103 265 2,410 Ethnicity Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total White 8,591 1,418 526 695 561 11,791 African American 3,898 414 111 114 172 4,709 Hispanic 10,727 425 145 186 260 11,743 Asian 7,500 409 93 501 299 8,802 International 1,570 1,512 873 82 82 4,119 Other 1,118 208 32 130 52 1,540 Total 33,404 4,386 1,780 1,708 1,426 42,704 Accountability System, January 2016 4 of 23

By Level, Gender: Gender Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total Male 17,045 2,245 947 737 721 21,695 Female 16,359 2,141 833 971 705 21,009 Total 33,404 4,386 1,780 1,708 1,426 42,704 By Undergraduate Status: Undergraduate Full-time Part-time White African American Hispanic Asian Other Male Female First-Time in College 4,092 3,916 176 862 460 1,243 1,190 337 2,140 1,952 First-Time Transfer (from two- and four-year institutions) 4,894 3,204 1,690 1,366 629 1,691 793 415 2,409 2,485 Other Undergraduate 24,418 17,410 7,008 6,363 2,809 7,793 5,517 1,936 12,496 11,922 Total 33,404 24,530 8,874 8,591 3,898 10,727 7,500 2,688 17,045 16,359 Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - University of Houston Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH Total 243,615 175,655 419,270 40,127 13,557 17,913 6,637 497,504 34,685 State-Funded 240,916 172,534 413,450 40,127 13,557 17,885 6,637 491,656 34,294 Distance Education Semester Credit Hours Hybrid/Blended on campus Fully-distance education/internet Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH 15,463 17,666 33,129 1,355 156 0 0 34,640 2,339 30,709 22,043 52,752 3,515 159 0 0 56,426 3,827 FTSE FTSE Accountability System, January 2016 5 of 23

Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort 4-Year graduation rate 1996 2,253 11.9% 2009 3,107 21.6% 2010 3,459 24.7% 2011 3,564 27.3% 15.4 Same institution 10.7% 19.8% 22.8% 25.3% 14.6 Other TX institutions 1.2% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 0.8 5-Year graduation rate 1995 1,834 33.8% 2008 3,507 43.7% 2009 3,107 46.0% 2010 3,459 47.9% 14.1 Same institution 28.7% 38.9% 41.6% 42.6% 13.9 Other TX institutions 5.1% 4.8% 4.3% 5.3% 0.2 6-Year graduation rate 1994 1,694 44.6% 2007 3,292 55.0% 2008 3,507 55.7% 2009 3,107 57.6% 13.0 Same institution 37.2% 47.0% 48.2% 51.0% 13.8 Other TX institutions 7.4% 8.0% 7.5% 6.6% - 0.8 For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: http://www.txhighereddata.org/gradrates Source: CBM001,CBM002, and CBM009 UH is working hard to improve graduation rates, and the data indicate that we are making progress. Over the past several years we have implemented many new initiatives aimed at enhancing student persistence and reducing time to degree. Since FY 2000, significant improvements have been made in 4-year, 5-year and 6-year graduation rates. In fact, UH s 6-year graduation rate (at the same institution) reached a high of over 51% in, which is an 14 percentage point increase over FY 2000. Degrees and certificates awarded 10. Number of degrees and certificates awarded. FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Total Degrees* 5,602 9,238 9,160 63.5% White 2,896 3,179 2,936 1.4% African American 498 988 984 97.6% Hispanic 796 2,083 2,167 172.2% Asian 1,083 1,669 1,623 49.9% International 307 1,097 1,196 289.6% Other 22 222 254 1054.5% Institutional Gaps Target- Gaps Completion Level Associates N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A Baccalaureate 3,533 6,437 6,340 79.5% 6,282 100.9% Master's 1,398 2,075 2,060 47.4% Doctor's Research/Scholarship 206 272 335 62.6% 335 100.0% Doctor's Professional Practice 465 454 425-8.6% Certificates Upper-level certificates N/A N/A N/A N/A Post-baccalaureate certificates N/A N/A N/A N/A *Hispanic students, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Students who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American students. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International students are shown as a separate category. Gender Accountability System, January 2016 6 of 23

Male 2,450 4,304 4,435 81.0% Female 3,152 4,934 4,725 49.9% Source: CBM009 Source: CBM009 The number of degrees awarded at UH has increased 64% since FY 2000. Of special note, the number of degrees awarded to Hispanic and African American students have increased 172% and 98%, respectively, since FY 2000. 11. Undergraduate degrees to at-risk students Undergraduate Degrees to At-Risk Students FY 2000 FY 2014 Change FY 2000 to 1,659 4,398 4,280 2,621 Gaps Critical Fields: STEM Awards 12. Degrees awarded in STEM fields. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Computer Science* 87 139 175 221 154.0% 120 184.2% Engineering* 384 525 595 598 55.7% 659 90.7% Math* 30 90 114 113 276.7% 82 137.8% Physical Science* 29 131 154 134 362.1% 148 90.5% Level Associate's 0 0 0 0 N/A Baccalaureate 530 885 1,038 1,066 101.1% 1,009 105.6% Master's 222 423 426 566 155.0% Doctor's Research/Scholarship 59 105 121 135 128.8% * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees. Since FY 2000, the number of UH graduates in key scientific and technological fields has more than doubled at all academic levels. Nursing and Allied Health 13. Degrees and certificates awarded in nursing. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Total Nursing Degrees 0 0 0 0 N/A Certificate 0 0 0 0 N/A Associates 0 0 0 0 N/A Baccalaureate 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 N/A Master's 0 0 0 0 N/A Doctor's Research/Scholarship 0 0 0 0 N/A Doctor's Professional Practice 0 0 0 0 N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. 14. Degrees and certificates awarded in allied health. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Total Allied Health Degrees 65 85 91 102 56.9% Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Accountability System, January 2016 7 of 23

Certificate 0 0 0 0 N/A Associates 0 0 0 0 N/A Baccalaureate 39 50 51 54 38.5% 59 92% Master's 26 35 40 48 84.6% Doctor's Research/Scholarship 0 0 0 0 N/A Doctor's Professional Practice 0 0 0 0 N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. UH's allied health degrees include communication disorders and health majors. Due to the small number of programs, the number of degrees awarded in these fields is also small, though we have seen an increase of 57% since 2000. It is important to note that UH's programs in optometry and pharmacy are not counted as "allied health" degrees, yet UH awards over 200 degrees in these fields annually. Teacher Production and Certification 15. Students taking and passing the certification exams for teacher education. FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Total number taking exam 384 413 445 Race/Ethnicity White 187 190 175 African American 36 37 43 Hispanic 113 130 170 Other 48 56 57 Gender Male 68 71 86 Female 316 342 359 Total percent passing exam 96.0% 95.0% 96.0% Race/Ethnicity White 99.0% 97.0% 96.0% African American 93.0% 95.0% 86.0% Hispanic 94.0% 94.0% 98.0% Other 92.0% 90.0% 98.0% Gender Male 96.0% 99.0% 98.0% Female 96.0% 94.0% 96.0% Note: The data for teacher production and certification was provided by SBEC. In some cases, the sum of the categories does not add up to the total. Numbers less than 10 in a category are suppressed. Data for the most recent year shown may be incomplete. The percentage of UH graduates passing the teacher certification exam remains very high at 96%. Graduation and Persistence Rate: 6-Year 16. First-time, full-time students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Total 1994 1,694 65.5% 2007 3,292 70.6% 2008 3,507 71.1% 2009 3,107 73.0% 7.5 Same institution 49.3% 53.3% 54.4% 57.2% 7.9 Other TX institutions 16.2% 17.3% 16.7% 15.8% - 0.4 White 1994 765 62.2% 2007 913 69.3% 2008 936 70.9% 2009 790 71.9% 9.7 Same institution 43.9% 51.9% 53.8% 58.0% 14.1 Other TX institutions 18.3% 17.4% 17.1% 13.9% - 4.4 African American 1994 188 56.9% 2007 648 61.6% 2008 711 60.3% 2009 545 61.1% 4.2 Same institution 45.7% 41.0% 40.8% 40.7% - 5.0 Other TX institutions 11.2% 20.5% 19.5% 20.4% 9.2 Hispanic 1994 299 65.6% 2007 752 66.1% 2008 826 68.8% 2009 786 70.4% 4.8 Same institution 51.5% 49.6% 53.6% 55.0% 3.5 Other TX institutions 14.0% 16.5% 15.1% 15.4% 1.4 Asian 1994 396 77.8% 2007 869 84.2% 2008 839 81.9% 2009 846 84.0% 6.2 Same institution 61.4% 67.5% 64.1% 67.5% 6.1 Other TX institutions 16.4% 16.7% 17.8% 16.5% 0.1 Other 1994 46 50.0% 2007 110 58.2% 2008 195 73.8% 2009 140 74.3% 24.3 Same institution 34.8% 49.1% 68.2% 67.1% 32.3 Other TX institutions 15.2% 9.1% 5.6% 7.1% - 8.1 For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: http://www.txhighereddata.org/gradrates Accountability System, January 2016 8 of 23

Source: CBM001, CBM002 and CBM009 The university continues to make overall progress on this measure. Success - Contextual Measures 17. Enrollment: Percent of first-time students 19 and under Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall 2015 96.8% 98.3% 98.5% 1.7 18. Financial Aid: Percent of students receiving Pell Grants Fall 2000 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Point Change Fall 2013 27.3% 40.7% 40.0% 12.7 19. Part-time first-time, degree seeking, undergraduates Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall 2015 9.2% 3.5% 4.2% - 5.0 Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Entering Cohort Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 20. Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: One-Year Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 2,847 88.9% 3,332 90.8% 3,909 92.6% 3.7 Same institution 78.6% 85.0% 86.3% 7.7 Other TX institutions 10.3% 5.8% 6.3% - 4.0 White 949 86.1% 814 89.1% 907 88.8% 2.7 Same institution 72.2% 80.6% 81.7% 9.5 Other TX institutions 13.9% 8.5% 7.1% - 6.8 African American 534 87.5% 373 88.5% 461 92.8% 5.3 Same institution 80.1% 80.4% 83.5% 3.4 Other TX institutions 7.3% 8.0% 9.3% 2.0 Hispanic 591 89.5% 980 89.8% 1,143 91.0% 1.5 Same institution 78.7% 84.0% 83.2% 4.5 Other TX institutions 10.8% 5.8% 7.8% - 3.0 Asian 654 94.2% 917 95.5% 1,085 98.1% 3.9 Same institution 86.1% 91.9% 94.4% 8.3 Other TX institutions 8.1% 3.6% 3.7% - 4.4 Other 119 85.7% 248 86.3% 313 90.7% 5.0 Same institution 80.7% 85.1% 86.9% 6.2 Other TX institutions 5.0% 1.2% 3.8% - 1.2 Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2012 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Point Change Fall 2013 21. Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: Two-Year Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 2,847 83.7% 3,253 86.0% 3,327 86.0% 2.3 Same institution 65.7% 72.8% 75.1% 9.4 Other TX institutions 17.9% 13.2% 10.9% - 7.0 White 949 81.1% 822 86.1% 812 81.8% 0.7 Same institution 61.0% 70.1% 68.0% 7.0 Other TX institutions 20.1% 16.1% 13.8% - 6.3 African American 534 79.0% 414 80.2% 372 83.3% 4.3 Same institution 63.3% 67.1% 71.5% 8.2 Other TX institutions 15.7% 13.0% 11.8% - 3.9 Hispanic 591 85.6% 954 83.6% 979 83.4% - 2.2 Same institution 65.5% 69.9% 71.2% 5.7 Other TX institutions 20.1% 13.7% 12.2% - 7.9 Accountability System, January 2016 9 of 23

Asian 654 91.4% 868 92.3% 916 93.3% 1.9 Same institution 75.1% 81.6% 84.6% 9.5 Other TX institutions 16.4% 10.7% 8.7% - 7.7 Other 119 72.3% 195 81.0% 248 87.1% 14.8 Same institution 63.9% 71.8% 84.7% 20.8 Other TX institutions 8.4% 9.2% 2.4% - 6.0 Developmental Education Fall 2011 Cohort 22. The percent of underprepared and prepared students who successfully complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing. Prepared students are given 1 year. Underprepared students are given 3 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 3,738 Met state standards in all three areas 3,645 Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at entry) 88 Unknown* (unduplicated) 5 Received credit pre-matriculation (b) College level course completion (grade A, B, or C) (c) College level course completion (grade A, B, C) including pre-matriculation credit (percent of total) (b+c)/(a) Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 3,695 282 2,700 80.7% Reading 3,674 795 2,113 79.2% Writing 3,680 704 2,286 81.3% Did Not Meet Standard Math 38 N/A 23 60.5% Reading 59 N/A 37 62.7% Writing 53 N/A 36 67.9% Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** 5 N/A 4 80.0% Reading** 5 N/A 5 100.0% Writing** 5 N/A 5 100.0% Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met State Standard in All Three Areas Math 3,645 280 2,665 80.8% Reading 3,645 787 2,102 79.3% Writing 3,645 699 2,267 81.4% Did Not Meet Standard in All Three Areas Math 14 N/A 6 42.9% Reading 14 N/A 7 50.0% Writing 14 N/A 8 57.1% The data for this accountability measure is tracked for one year for students who met TSI and for one, two, and three years for students who did not meet TSI for this report. *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. 23. Underprepared students who satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 3,738 Met state standards in all three 3,645 areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at 88 entry) Unknown* (unduplicated) 5 Number attempting developmental education (b) Percent attempting developmental education (includes DevEd interventions) (b/a) TSI obligations met (of those attempting developmental education) (d) Fall 2011 Cohort TSI obligations met through any means (of total) (e) TSI obligations met (percent of those attempting developmental education) (d/b) TSI obligations met (percent of total as reported by institution) (e/a) TSI obligations met based on TSI reporting or passed 1st college-level course (percent of total) (e) and/or Passed /(a) Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 3,695 238 6.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 3,674 20 0.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 3,680 72 2.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standard Math 38 17 44.7% 11 22 64.7% 57.9% 68.4% Reading 59 14 23.7% 13 42 92.9% 71.2% 76.3% Writing 53 38 71.7% 30 38 78.9% 71.7% 71.7% Accountability System, January 2016 10 of 23

Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** 5 2 40.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading** 5 1 20.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing** 5 0 0.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met state standards in all areas Math 3,645 233 6.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 3,645 20 0.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 3,645 66 1.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standards in All Three Areas Math 14 6 42.9% 4 7 66.7% 50.0% 50.0% Reading 14 1 7.1% 1 6 100.0% 42.9% 57.1% Writing 14 9 64.3% 7 8 77.8% 57.1% 57.1% *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. Passed is the number of students who passed a first college-level course as shown on measure #22. 24. Percent of students who return the following fall. Total (a) Fall 2011 Cohort Number returning (Fall 2012) (b) Percent returning (Fall 2012) (b/a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 3,738 3,335 89 Met state standards in all areas 3,645 3,261 89.5% Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas 88 69 78.4% Did not meet state standards in all three areas 14 10 71.4% Unknown* (unduplicated) 5 5 100.0% Data by Subject Area Met Standard by Area Math 3,695 3,301 89.3% Reading 3,674 3,284 89.4% Writing 3,680 3,291 89.4% Did Not Meet Standard by Area Math 38 29 76.3% Reading 59 46 78.0% Writing 53 39 73.6% Unknown** by Area (waived or military exemption) Math 5 5 100.0% Reading 5 5 100.0% Writing 5 5 100.0% *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 25. Graduation of two-year college students 1-29 SCH (before transfer) 167 ( 28.2%) 330 ( 37.3%) 301 ( 33.4%) 5.2 30 SCH or more (before transfer) 534 ( 33.5%) 1,291 ( 48.9%) 1,248 ( 49.5%) 16.0 Source: CBM001 and CBM009. 26. Percentage of baccalaureate graduates by SCH completed at two-year colleges: 1-29 SCH (at any time) 38.6% 34.8% 35.3% - 3.3 30 SCH or more (at any time) 34.1% 37.4% 36.7% 2.6 Source: CBM001 and CBM009. Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate 27. Graduation Rates Master's Fall 1995 66.2% Fall 2009 86.9% Fall 2010 87.6% Doctoral Fall 1990 35.5% Fall 2004 58.2% Fall 2005 70.9% Baccalaureate graduate success FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2014 Accountability System, January 2016 11 of 23

28. Percent of baccalaureate graduates who are employed or enrolled in a Texas graduate program or professional school Baccalaureate Graduates Employment/Enrollment Status 29. Employed in 4th quarter in which program year ends 30. In graduate or professional school in Texas in fall of the next FY 31. Employed in Texas and enrolled in a graduate or professional school in Texas 73.9% 76.9% 75.2% 1.3 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2014 62.0% 66.8% 66.5% 4.5 5.5% 5.0% 4.2% - 1.3 6.3% 5.1% 4.5% - 1.8 For more detailed information on enrollments and employment of graduates and other leavers, go to: http://txhighereddata.org/reports/performance/ctcasalf/exitcohorts/ 32. Undergraduate efficiency ratio Ratio of Undergraduate FTSE to Undergraduate Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded Fall 2000 FTSE/ FY 2001 UG Degrees Fall 2013 FTSE/ FY 2014 UG Degrees Fall 2014 FTSE/ UG Degrees N/A 3.92 4.18 Accountability System, January 2016 12 of 23

Accountability System, January 2016 13 of 23

Graduation Rate: Four, five, and six-year graduation rates of first-time, full-time degree seeking undergraduates. Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers University of Houston UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers CINCINNATI-MAIN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO SOUTH CAROLINA-COLUMBIA 4-Year Rate 18% 15.0% 37.0% 28.0% 33.0% 56.0% 5-Year Rate 39% 37.0% 62.0% 60.0% 55.0% 71.0% 6-Year Rate 48% 47.0% 67.0% 65.0% 60.0% 73.0% Degrees Awarded: Number of graduates by level, race/ethnicity and gender. Total Degrees 9,208 5,575 6,079 9,117 7,069 7,470 Level White 3,166 2,521 3,781 6,561 3,254 5,544 African American 933 117 364 653 452 847 Hispanic 2,069 1,983 373 233 974 274 Asian 1,640 197 286 347 1,240 199 Other 1,400 757 1,275 1,323 1,149 606 Associates 0 0 0 73 0 4 Bachelors 6,372 3,692 3,913 4,817 3,756 4,928 Master's 2,081 1,308 1,693 2,871 2,264 1,660 Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice Gender 275 231 210 265 328 325 480 288 141 503 641 394 Male 4,299 2,368 3,037 3,901 3,121 3,210 Female 4,909 3,207 3,042 5,216 3,948 4,260 Graduation Rate: Percent of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates who have graduated after six academic years. Total 48.0% 48.0% 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 73.0% White 49.0% 52.0% 69.0% 63.0% 62.0% 74.0% African American 36.0% 39.0% 61.0% 34.0% 43.0% 74.0% Hispanic 46.0% 46.0% 60.0% 59.0% 56.0% 62.0% Asian 56.0% 50.0% 78.0% 64.0% 65.0% 68.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 9.0% 29.0% 53.0% 42.0% 50.0% 73.0% Unknown 76.0% 48.0% N/A 56.0% 60.0% 72.0% Nonresident Alien 64.0% 62.0% 67.0% 63.0% 71.0% 50.0% Graduates in Key Fields: Number of degrees awarded in specific fields by level. Computer Science 284 65 67 221 295 94 Engineering 671 276 430 677 533 339 Math 168 76 53 65 100 75 Physical Science 187 77 123 81 64 79 Nursing and Allied-Health Graduates: Number of degrees awarded in nursing/allied-health by level. Total Degrees 90 426 0 1,546 816 435 Certificate 0 6 0 27 49 13 Associates 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bachelors 52 259 0 708 257 245 Accountability System, January 2016 14 of 23

Master's 38 127 0 734 417 152 Doctor's Research/Scholarship 0 8 0 9 44 25 Graduates Detail ( )- University of Houston Success By 2015, increase by 50 percent the number of degrees, certificates, and other identifiable student successes from high quality programs. By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Race/Ethnicity Doctor's Doctor's Associate's Bachelor's Master's Research/ Professional Total Scholarship Practice White 0 1,919 693 100 224 2,936 African American 0 754 185 23 22 984 Hispanic 0 1,870 228 30 39 2,167 Asian 0 1,286 194 22 121 1,623 International 0 322 708 157 9 1,196 Other 0 189 52 3 10 254 Accountability System, January 2016 15 of 23

Excellence - Key Measures Faculty Teaching 33. Tenured/tenure-track faculty teaching lower-division SCH Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 46.8% 25.1% 23.3% - 23.5 Over the past several years, UH has hired significant numbers of full-time, instructional faculty to accommodate high demand for undergraduate courses. While doing so has lowered the lower division SCH taught by tenured/tenure-track faculty, better course availability facilitates student persistence and will reduce time to degree. Student/Faculty Ratio 34. Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) divided by full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty. FTSE Fall 2000 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2013 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2014 FTFE Ratio % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 FTSE/FTFE Ratio 24,659 1,053 23:1 31,785 1,418 22:1 33,217 1,456 23:1-2.5% UH is continually examining faculty needs and hiring new faculty in relation to anticipated enrollment growth, research strengths, and the participation goals of Gaps. State and National Exams Success 35. Certification and licensure rates FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2012 to Law 90.4% 87.6% 81.8% - 8.4 Pharmacy 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% - 0.2 Nursing N/A N/A N/A N/A Engineering 92.0% 80.0% 88.0% 11.1 The pass rates of UH law, pharmacy and engineering graduates continue to be high, reflecting the quality of their academic preparation for professional employment. Tenured/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty 36. Percent of FTE teaching faculty who are tenured/tenure-track Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 70.4% 60.5% 60.9% - 9.5 With increasing enrollment, the university has adopted a strategy of hiring instructional faculty who are committed to teaching full-time. It is also important to recognize that the city of Houston is an excellent source of working professionals who can serve as adjuncts in a variety of fields (e.g., law, business, architecture, the arts). The expertise of these individuals greatly enhances the academic experience for students. Quality Enhancement Plan 37. Quality Enhancement Plan, Including Reaffirmation Year The Learning through Discovery Initiative is the University of Houston s comprehensive Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). The initiative promotes a teaching and learning culture supportive of research in all disciplines for all undergraduate students. It provides students with opportunities to enhance their research skills, including online tutorials for research writing and information science skills, as well as new courses that incorporate research. An annual QEP Curriculum Development Grant Program provides support to faculty for the development of new courses or for enhancement of existing courses with inquiry-based learning activities and research assignments. There are also expanded student research opportunities both on and off campus with opportunities to participate in research projects through mentored research or research internships. This experience will equip our students with the tools they need to compete in the global marketplace or as they pursue graduate studies. The five-year implementation period for the QEP as required by SACSCOC has now concluded, and the University of Houston is preparing to develop a new QEP. Excellent Programs 38. Excellent Programs Highlighted Excellent Programs 1 UHin4 Accountability System, January 2016 16 of 23

The UHin4 program forms a collaborative effort between the University and students to simplify the process for students to earn both a high quality and affordable education within four years. Offered to incoming freshmen each summer and fall, UHin4 makes resources available to students to help them identify and pursue a comprehensive graduation plan and to help them successfully navigate the college experience. These resources include four-year academic maps, degree progress tools, and a fixed tuition option to assist with planning and budgeting. Further, students who complete 30 semester credit hours each year receive fixed tuition for four years, a hallmark of the program. For more information about UHin4, please visit: http://www.uh.edu/provost/uhin4/. Highlighted Excellent Programs 2 Texas Center for Superconductivity at UH (TCSUH) Applied Research Hub Based on original discoveries by TCSUH, scientists at the Applied Research Hub have developed superconducting wire that conducts electricity at much higher efficiency levels than traditional wire. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the transmission of electricity across the nation s power grid and create electric generators that will produce 50% more power at less than half the weight and size of conventional counterparts. Using the same manufacturing process, Applied Research Hub scientists are also developing electronic components (e.g., solar cells, sold state lighting) that are superior in performance to standard models and require less expensive materials to fabricate. These technologies hold enormous scientific and economic potential for UH and the state of Texas. If technologies being developed prove viable for large-scale use, the revenue and new jobs generated from their manufacture and sale will be transformative for both UH and the regional economy. To read more, please visit http://www.tcsuh.com/research/ar Excellence - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 39. FTE tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics Ethnicity Total 70.4% 60.5% 60.9%* - 9.5 White 69.9% 58.2% 59.0% - 10.9 African American 69.2% 52.4% 49.0% - 20.2 Hispanic 59.1% 52.5% 50.8% - 8.3 Asian 82.1% 79.3% 79.4% - 2.7 International N/A 64.5% 64.1% N/A Other 73.7% 35.3% 40.7% - 33.0 Gender Male 78.0% 68.9% 69.4% - 8.6 Female 53.6% 47.1% 47.5% - 6.1 *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Rank Teaching Assistants Other Faculty Instructor Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor 40. Faculty Rank (Fall 2014) Faculty Ethnicity Total* 1,448 1,341 0 218 346 431 White 415 920 0 120 221 316 African American 49 81 0 6 18 14 Hispanic 92 118 0 10 37 19 Asian 70 114 0 42 63 78 International 804 73 0 37 2 3 Other 18 35 0 3 5 1 Faculty Gender Male 796 729 0 125 216 354 Female 652 612 0 93 130 77 *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Salary by Rank FY 2002 FY 2014 % Change FY 2002 to National Average () % National Average 41. Faculty Salary Comparisons Professor $92,411 $137,961 $140,386 51.9% $117,155 120% Associate Professor $63,574 $92,721 $93,162 46.5% $83,243 112% Assistant Professor $54,575 $89,214 $88,151 61.5% $71,840 123% Instructor $0 $0 N/A $49,231 0% Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall 2015 42. Endowed Professorships and Chairs N/A 213 217 N/A Percent unfilled N/A 16.0% 18.0% N/A Accountability System, January 2016 17 of 23

Percent of total tenured/tenure-track faculty N/A 21.8% 21.2% N/A 43. Nobel Prize Winners and National Academies FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to Nobel Prize Winner 1 1 1 0.0% National Academy of Science 2 2 2 0.0% National Academy of Engineering 6 6 6 0.0% Academy of Arts and Sciences 1 1 1 0.0% American Law Institute 15 16 17 13.3% 44. Other Faculty Awards FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to FY 2015 American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellows 0 0 1 N/A Cottrell Scholars 1 0 0-100.0% Fulbright American Scholars 3 3 1-66.7% Guggenheim Fellows 0 1 0 N/A NSF CAREER Award winners (excluding those who are also PECASE winners) 3 5 4 33.3% Faculty data reported in the Key and Contextual Measures sections are different from the data reported in the Out-of-State Peers section. Coordinating Board data are used for the former; IPEDS data (which capture universities outside of Texas) are used for the latter. Different definitions used by these organizations in the collection of data yield different results. Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Percentage of all full-time faculty members who are tenured or tenure-track. Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track faculty University of Houston Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN Institution's Out-of-State Peers CINCINNATI-MAIN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO SOUTH CAROLINA-COLUMBIA 80% 54% 80% 54% 63% 67% Accountability System, January 2016 18 of 23

Research - Key Measures Federal and Private Research 45. Federal and private research expenditures per FTE faculty FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to $47,023 $87,754 $82,197 74.8% Research Expenditures 46. Research expenditures ($ Million) FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Institutional Gaps Target- Fall 2015 Gaps Completion $61.332 $108.766 $124.076 102.3% $150.000 82.7% Sponsored Research Funds 47. Federal and private (sponsored) research funds per revenue appropriations. FY 2011 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to 29.6% 35.4% 34.1% 4.5 Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Research - Contextual Measures FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 48. Research Expenditures by Source ($ Millions) $61.332 $108.766 $124.076 102.3% Federal $24.227 $57.373 $56.306 132.4% State $22.394 $21.670 $25.545 14.1% Private $10.638 $17.862 $16.563 55.7% Institutional $4.074 $11.861 $25.661 529.9% Restricted Research Expenditures (amount shown is a subset of the categories above) $30.781 $62.194 $64.394 109.2% For information on restricted research expenditures, go to http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/rdf FY 2009 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2009 to 49. Faculty holding extramural research grants Number 491 514 482 481-2.0% Percent 53% 53% 49.8% 50.64% - 2.4 Patents 50. Number of new U.S. patents issued or reissued. 51. Number of new patent applications FY 2001 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 8 19 20 29 262.5% 17 106 101 110 547.1% Accountability System, January 2016 19 of 23

Research expenditures reported in the Contextual Measures section are different from those reported in the Out-of-State Peers section. Coordinating Board data are used for the former; IPEDS data (which capture universities outside of Texas) are used for the latter. Different definitions used by these organizations in the collection of data yield different results. In addition, significant differences in research funding at UH relative to out-of-state peers are a result of medical schools and related research funding at the peer institutions. NOTE: In the out-of-state peers section, Federal Research Funds for UH include dollars for federally sponsored instructional and public service programs, in addition to funds for research. Research Expenditures Current year research expenditures. Research Expenditures University of Houston Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN CINCINNATI-MAIN Institution's Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO SOUTH CAROLINA-COLUMBIA $132,994,339 $197,544,068 $116,542,000 $193,942,929 $280,096,827 $137,639,867 Research Funds Amount of sponsored (external/federal) research funds. Federal Research Funds $63,477,158 $189,067,209 $61,388,000 $121,729,957 $249,431,659 $123,477,362 Source: IPEDS Fall 2014 Accountability System, January 2016 20 of 23

Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Key Measures Administrative Cost 52. Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 10.4% 5.9% 6.8% - 3.6 Space Usage Efficiency (SUE) 53. Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization. Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150. Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Classroom space use efficiency 75 75 Lab space use efficiency 92 92 Overall space use efficiency 167 167 Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty 54. State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty. FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Appropriated funds per FTE student $6,589 $6,368 $6,163-6.5% Appropriated funds per FTE faculty $75,439 $67,666 $66,761-11.5% Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) FY 2000 FY 2014 %/Point Change FY 2000 to 55. HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions) $ 4.099 $ 22.633 $ 21.692 429.2% Percent of total expenditures 6.5% 7.9% 9.5% 3.0 HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) $ 9.141 $ 81.907 $ 43.095 371.4% Percent of total expenditures 14.4% 28.4% 18.8% 4.4 Operating Expenses per FTE Student 56. Operating expenses per FTE student FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to $14,147 $21,945 $22,854 61.5% Total Revenue per FTE Student and FTE teaching Faculty FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to 57. Total revenue Per FTE student $13,753 $24,746 $25,465 85.2% Per FTE faculty $165,592 $262,927 $275,851 66.6% Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Contextual Measures Class Size Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall 2015 58. Average class size 45 48 50 11.1% Median class size 34 25 26-23.5% 59. Percentage of undergraduate classes with less than 20 students 60. Percentage of undergraduate classes with 50 students or more 22.2% 30.4% 28.7% 6.5 26.6% 20.7% 20.6% - 6.0 Accountability System, January 2016 21 of 23

61. Average cost of resident undergraduate tuition and fees for 30 SCH. FY 2000 FY 2016 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2016 $2,987 $10,331 $10,331 245.9% Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 % Change Fall 2015 62. E&G Square footage E&G classroom per FTE student 11.25 8.85 8.41-25.2% E&G lab per FTE student 7.16 4.36 4.70-34.4% Endowment 63. True and Term Endowment ($ millions) 64. Quasi Endowment ($ millions) 65. Total Endowment ($ millions) 66. Total Endowment - Per FTE student FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2011 to $459.0 $496.0 $536.0 $517.0 $132.0 $141.0 $149.0 $139.0 $591.0 $637.0 $685.0 $656.0 11.0% $17,912 $18,822 $20,518 $18,907 5.6% FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 67. Total Revenue* $387,220,941 $826,126,750 $883,545,195 128.2% State appropriations $178,465,749 $212,607,818 $213,835,488 19.8% Tuition and fees $104,460,300 $295,962,039 $316,143,238 202.6% Federal grants and contracts $42,325,563 $119,616,176 $124,420,372 194.0% Institutional resources $61,969,329 $197,940,717 $229,146,097 269.8% Constitutional funds $25,986,116 $35,885,768 $35,885,768 38.1% Total Revenue with Constitutional Funds $413,207,057 $862,012,518 $919,430,963 122.5% *Does not include Constitutional Funds Link to additional information: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/frp/su/ Administrative Cost Ratio Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of operative expenses Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget University of Houston Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers NEW MEXICO-MAIN OKLAHOMA-NORMAN CINCINNATI-MAIN Institution's Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO SOUTH CAROLINA-COLUMBIA 4% 2% 3% 5% 1% 3% Appropriations State and local government appropriation revenues per FTE student. Appropriations per FTE student $5,329 $11,084 $6,414 $5,473 $6,913 $3,552 Expenditures Instruction expenses per FTE student. Instruction expenses per FTE student $7,993 $11,745 $12,188 $10,072 $26,053 $10,729 Accountability System, January 2016 22 of 23

Tuition and Fees Tuition and Fee revenue per FTE student. Tuition and Fee Revenue per FTE student $9,891 $5,411 $11,150 $12,556 $11,629 $10,577 Accountability System, January 2016 23 of 23