Department of Civil Engineering-I.I.T. Delhi CEL 212: Environmental Engineering

Similar documents
BALANCING REDOX EQUATIONS. Each redox equation contains two parts -- the oxidation and reduction parts. Each is balanced separately.

1.85 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 20, 2005

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

Example Calculations Evaluation for Fine Bubble Aeration System. Red Valve Company, Inc. 700 NORTH BELL AVENUE CARNEGIE, PA

Best Practice Guide NO. BPGCS002. Wastewater Treatment Activated Sludge Process

ADVANCED LAGOON TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

NUTRIENT REMOVAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT CLIFFORD W. RANDALL, PHD EMERITUS PROFESSOR VIRGINIA TECH


Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems. Water and Wastewater Utility Operation and

THE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

5.1.3 Model of biological phosphorus removal

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

aquateam Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Centre A/S Report no: Project no: O Project manager: Dr. Bjørn Rusten.

Wastewater Nutrient Removal

ENGINEERING REPORT Sewage Treatment System

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries


Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

Biological Wastewater Treatment

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process Part III

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

WEFTEC.06. *Corresponding author Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Process

HW10 PCBs/Pesticides Remediation 10 points Due: Nov. 21

Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the wastewater treatment plant: a decision support system for planning and management

TALLINN WATER TREATMENT AND SEWERAGE Tuuli Myllymaa

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Waster Systems in Maryland. A growing challenge for the industry and regulators

POTW PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES

Case Study of an Advanced On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Connected to a Single-Family Residence

A Modified UCT Method for Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

Orange County Sanitation District

Holistic Aeration and Chemical Optimization Saves Big Money from 1 MGD to 600 MGD. Trevor Ghylin, PE PhD

Report Naga City: Septage treatment and wastewater concept for Del Rosario

Iowa DNR Wastewater Treatment Technology Assessment No

WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION

Sludge Stabilization Sustainability of Aerobic Digestion Processes Bryen Woo EGCE 597: Research Paper

Minnesota. BMI Project No. M

BLUE PLAINS - WASHINGTON DC NUTRIENT & ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY

Achilleas Papadopoulos & Simos Malamis & Kostas Moustakas & Christos T. Kiranoudis & Maria Loizidou

Enhancing Nitrification in an Oil Refinery WWTP with IFAS

Table 1.1: Typical Characteristics of Anaerobically Digested Wastewater

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. II - Technologies for Water Pollution Control - Wang Jianlong

Primer for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems

Appendix 2-1. Sewage Treatment Process Options

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

Pursuant to Department of Environmental Protection Rules Chapter 555, effective March 9, 2009

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

Mole Notes.notebook. October 29, 2014

Anaerobic Digestion: Biology and Benefits

ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. II Biochemical Oxygen Demand - Michael R. Penn, James J. Pauer, James R. Mihelcic

EPB 311- Strategies for Dealing with Groundwater Treatment Systems Having High Natural Ammonia

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

SMALL COMMUNITY TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION WHILE IN OPERATION USING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

USC UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. CE 210L Introduction to Environmental Engineering Microbiology

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

During the past decade, the city of

Who is responsible for making sure that wastewater is treated properly?

Engineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training

Mainstream Deammonification: Current Projects and Status. S. Murthy, B. Wett and M. van Loosdrecht

Facility Classification Standards

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant Super Storm Sandy Recovery

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN IN WASTEWATER 3. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL MECHANISM 4. PROCESS REQUIREMENT AND CONTROL FACTOR

Bioremediation. Biodegradation

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

Water Management in Helsinki. Water supply. Mikael Sillfors

The City of Boulder 75 th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility

Environmental Science 101 Waste. Fall Lecture Outline: Terms You Should Know: Learning Objectives: Reading Assignment: Chlorinated.

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Recycle treated effluent to meet looi of the facility's non-potable water needs. nutrient removal and activated carbon adsorption.

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Sakhnin City in Israel by Using Advanced Technologies

Phosphorous Reduction in the Assabet River

Phosphorus Removal. P.F. Strom, 2006; do not copy without written permission.

Sewage (Wastewater) Treatment *

Part One: Mass and Moles of Substance. Molecular Mass = sum of the Atomic Masses in a molecule

Migrating Guelph Wastewater s Data Monitoring Program to a Web-Based Reporting System:

True Confessions of the Biological Nutrient Removal Process

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Applications of Advanced Oxidation for Wastewater Treatment

Small Wastewater Treatment Systems

COD/BOD 5 Reduction with ROTAMAT Fine and Micro Screens

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

Transcription:

Department of Civil Engineering-I.I.T. Delhi CEL 212: Environmental Engineering Q1. An anaerobic reactor, operated at 35 o C, treats wastewater with a flow of 2000m 3 /d and a biological soluble COD (bscod) concentration of 500g/m 3. At 90% bscod removal and a biomass synthesis yield of 0.04 g Volatile Suspended Solids/ g bscod used, estimate the amount of methane produced in m 3 /d. Step 1: Prepare a steady state mass balance for COD to determine the amount of influent COD converted to methane. COD in = COD eff + COD VSS(biomass) + COD methane COD in = COD concentration in influent x Wastewater Inflow COD eff = COD concentration in effluent x Wastewater Inflow COD VSS = 1.42 g COD/g VSS x Yield coeff g VSS/g COD x Efficiency of system COD methane =? Step 2: Determine the volume of gas occupied by 1 mole of gas at 35 o C. Step 3: The CH 4 equivalent of COD converted under anaerobic conditions = (L/ mole)/ (64 g COD/ mole CH 4 ) Step 4: CH 4 production = COD methane x CH 4 equivalent of COD converted COD in = COD concentration in influent x Wastewater Inflow = ( 500g/m 3 ) *(2000m 3 /d)=1000 Kg/d Biological soluble COD removal = 90% COD eff = 0.10* 1000 Kg/d = 100 Kg/d COD used = 0.90* 1000 Kg/d = 900 Kg/d Biomass synthesis yield = 0.04 g Volatile Suspended Solids/ g bscod used Biomass synthesis yield = (900*1000g/day)*(0.04 g VSS)=36000 g/day COD corresponding to biomass = (36000 g VSS/day)*(1.42 g COD/g VSS)=51.120 Kgday COD in = COD eff + COD VSS(biomass) + COD methane COD methane = COD in -{COD eff+ COD VSS(biomass) } COD methane = (1000 Kg/d)- {100 Kg/d+ 51.120} =848.88 Kg/d (answer) COD methane =848.88 Kg/d (answer) As 64 g COD comes from 1mole of CH 4. So 848.88 Kg/d COD would result from = (1 mole CH 4 /64)*(848.88 Kg/d) = 13.26 mole CH 4 /day Now we know that for STP conditions (i.e., 273 K and 1 atm pressure, 1 mole gas occupies 22.4 Liter volume). Now we need to calculate volume of methane gas at 35 C (i.e., 308K) and 1 atm pressure: V/T=constant (as P is constant here) [22.4/273] = [V2/308] ==> V2=25.27 Liters/mole (this is true for methane gas also) Now as biological process is producing 13.26 moles methane gas/day, it indicates that 335.1 liters/day (or 0.335 m3/day). 1

Q2. The water content of solids slurry (WW sludge) is reduced from 98 to 95 %. What is the percent reduction in volume assuming that solids contain 70% organic matter of specific gravity 1.0 and 30% mineral matters of specific gravity 2.0? What is the specific gravity of 98 and 95% slurry? w1=98% (i.e., 2% solids) w2=95% (i.e., 5% solids) (this solid content is increased due to dewatering process) W solids /(S solids *ρ w ) = W mineral /(S mineral *ρ w )+ W organic matter /(S organic matter * ρ w ) Here S: specific gravity W: weight ρ w = density of water (i.e.,1 Kg/liter) Case 1: Water content =98% (i.e., 2% solids); Organic matter content =70% =0.7 W solids Mineral matter =30% =0.3W solids ρ w = 1 Kg/liter S mineral =specific density of mineral = 2 S organic matter =specific density of organic matter=1 For determining specific gravity of all solids (S solids ): W solids /(S solids ) = 0.3W solids /(2)+0.7W solids /(1) 1/S solids = 0.15+0.7 = 0.85 =>S solids =1/0.85 =1.18 (this is specific density of solids) Now if specific density of water = 1 and water content =98% (i.e., solid content =2%), we can calculate specific gravity of sludge = 1/S sludge = (0.98)/1+(0.02)/1.18 =0.9969 S sludge = 1/0.9969 =1.003 (or Density of sludge = 1.003*1=1.003 Kg/L) Density of sludge = Mass of sludge /Volume of sludge =>Volume of sludge = Mass of sludge/density of sludge For 1 Kg mass of sludge, volume of sludge = 1/(solid content*density of sludge) = 1/(0.02*1.003) = 49.85 liters (initial volume of sludge per Kg mass of sludge) After solid waste treatment, water content is 95% (i.e., 5% solids). V1=49.85 liters/kg Assuming specific gravity of sludge remains same (i.e., S sludge = 1.003) or Density =1.003 Kg/L New volume of sludge after reduction in water content per Kg of sludge =V2= 1/(0.05*1.003) = 19.94 liters So volume reduction = [1-(19.94/49.85)] *100 =60% 2

Q3. Assume that the data given in Q2 belongs to primary sludge. What will be the volume of digested slurry in case 60% of the volatile solids are destroyed and water content is reduced to 90%? Say 60% volatile solids (or organic matter) is destroyed. Initially 70% solid was organic matter and now remaining organic matter = (70%)*(0.40) = 28% (or mineral content =1-0.28=0.72 (i.e., 72%). Revised water content =90% (and thus solid content =10%). 1/(S sludge ) = 0.72/(2)+0.28/(1) =0.64 S sludge =1/0.64 =1.56 Density of sludge = 1.56*1=1.56 Kg/L Volume of sludge = Mass of sludge/density of sludge For 1 Kg mass of sludge, volume of sludge = 1/(0.10*1.56) =6.41 liters Q4. What are three stages of anaerobic digestion process? Discuss their importance and BOD requirements at different stages. Hint:See Lecture Notes. Q5. Some substances can be toxic to bacterial growth. How can you incorporate this effect in determining specific biomass growth rate constant? Some substance can impart toxicity to bacteria and thus it might affect their growth. For incorporating this effect, microbial decay constant due to toxic substance (i.e., k decay,substance ) need to be determined.then this aspect needs to be incorporated in the overall biomass rate equation. R overall =R lag +R growth +R stationary +R endogenousdecay +R substance decay Q6. Why do we keep SRT greater than HRT and how does it affect plant s performance? Keeping SRT> HRT results in long retention of biological solids (i.e., biomass) in aeration tank where aerobic biological processes occur. This increased retention of biological solids results in higher removal of organic matter compared to SRT=HRT situation (i.e., no recirculation case). Q7.Comment on performance of chlorination unit placed before and after aeration tank. Placing chlorination unit before aeration tank can kill bacteria however; it would not reduce microorganisms and pathogen in wastewater effluent which we might discharge to river. In this case, the discharge stream might have pathogens unsuitable for discharging in river water. 3

Q8. Calculate BOD and alkalinity requirements for removing 14 mg NH 4 + -N during nitrification process? Also explain the need for maintaining alkalinity in the nitrification reactor. Q9. A completely mixed activated sludge plant is to treat 10000 m 3 /d industrial wastewater (BOD 5 = 1200 mg/l; BOD effluent = 100 mg/l prior to discharge). For 5-day SRT, 5000 mg/l MLSS is required (Y= 0.7 kg/kg and k d =0.03/day). Calculate following: (i) The volume of the reactor (ii) The mass and volume of solids wasted each day (iii)the sludge recirculation ratio. (iv) To reduce BOD effluent to 30 mg/l would increase SRT a good idea? Discuss. Q10. Write overall oxidation and cell synthesis reactions during nitrification process and calculate amount of BOD required? Hint:See solution of Q8. Q11. Calculate total carbonaceous and nitrogen oxygen demand of a water sample that contains 5 mg/l organic compounds having chemical formula C 6 H 6 N 2 O 2. Assume that nitrogen is converted to ammonia and then to nitrate. Hint: See notes. This question has been discussed in class and asked in HW and Exam. Q12. Discuss different stages of anaerobic digestion process in the order they occur. Hint: See notes Q13. Name three disinfection kinetics models generally used to model disinfection process. Can CT concept be applied to all three kinetic models? Why or why not? Hint: For part 1: See notes. For part 2 Ct concept is applied only for first order kinetic model (i.e., for Chick s Law when n=1 in the Watson s Law). Q14. Comment on difference between domestic and hospital solid waste management (SWM) treatment methodologies. domestic SWM hospital SWM more treatment is required for inert more treatment is required for sharps, infectious and biodegradable materials generally, segregration, screening, biological processes are used and then land fill disposal and methan gas capturing is done. microorganisms and unused drugs, etc. generally segregation, followed by incineration is done to kill pathogens; biological process and advanced oxidation processes such as ozonation, UV radiation and hydrogen peroxide usage for properly treating unused drug before doing land filling and methane gas capturing if its feasible. Q15. Look at the following information for a completely mixed biological reactor. 4

Influent water information: Parameter Influent water Effluent water Flow rate 50 m 3 /d 50 m 3 /d Biomass 0 mg VSS/L?? Substrate 95 mg BOD 5 /L?? Tank volume 200 m 3 VSS: volatile suspended solids Calculate following: 1. effluent BOD 5 2. biodegradable organic matter removal efficiency of tank 3. biomass leaving the tank Here HRT =θ= 200m3/(50m3/d)= 4 days X in aerobic reactor =? S 0 =95 mg BOD 5 /L S final =? 1/θ =[(µ m S)/(K S +S)]-k d so: determine expression for S. S=[ K S (1+ θ k d )]/[( θµ m -1- θ k d )] Given K S =60 mgbod 5 /L (this is average value) k d =0.06/day (this is average value) µ m =3/day (this is average value) Solve for S now. It is coming out to be: S final = 6.9 mg BOD 5 /L S removal efficiency =(1-6.9/95)100% = 92.74% For determining X coming out of the system: Do a mass balance for substrate first. 0=QS 0 -QS f +Vr S here r S is rate of substrate utilization. sor S = -Q(S0-S)/V And we also know that r S = -kxs/[ K S +S] so {-Q(S0-S)/V} = -kxs/[ K S +S] X = [ (K S +S)(S0-S)(Q/V)]/(kS) here Q/V = 1/HRT solve for X. X=43 mg VSS/L Q16. Discuss removal efficiencies of different units for different contaminants in wastewater treatment plant with following schematic: Influent water Primary settling tank Biological aeration Secondary settling- Effluent water: Parameter Influent water After settling (and influent to aeration tank) 5 Effluent water BOD 200 mg/l 130 mg/l 30 mg/l suspended solids 240 mg/l 120 mg/l 30 mg/l phosphorous 7 mg/l 6 mg/l 5 mg/l nitrogen 35 mg/l 30 mg/l 26 mg/l

Removal efficiency table Parameter After settling after aeration tank BOD =(200- =(130- remarks more removal is observed in aeration tank than settling basin 130)/200=35% 30)/130=76.9% suspended solids =50% 75% more removal is observed in aeration tank than settling basin phosphorous 14.29% 16.67% more removal is observed in aeration tank than settling basin nitrogen 14.29% 13.33% comparable removal is observed in settling tank and in aeration tank Now for every contaminant, remaining concentration values need to be compared with receiving body standard (say for river) to determine if further water treatment is required and which parameters need to be removed and then one needs to decides about another unit process in the given treatment train. 6