US Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Perspectives for Backup Power Applications

Similar documents
Fuel Cell Systems for Telecom Backup Power

U.S. Department of Energy-Funded Performance Validation of Fuel Cell Material Handling Equipment

Update of Financial Incentives for Promoting New and Renewable Energy in the U.S. Cary Bloyd EGNRET-38 Wellington, New Zealand June 18-19, 2012

Backup Power Cost of Ownership Analysis and Incumbent Technology Comparison

Massachusetts PV and SHW Program Update Elizabeth Kennedy Program Director Massachusetts Clean Energy Center

Electrolysis for grid balancing Where are we?

Federal Incentives Provided by EPAct 2005 for Advanced Coal Technology

Stephen Bennington CELLA ENERGY

Hydrogen Infrastructure

Boxborough Solar 101. Presented by: Elizabeth Youngblood, Project Manager Massachusetts Clean Energy Center. April 16, 2016

ANALYSIS OF US AND STATE-BY-STATE CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS AND POTENTIAL SAVINGS IN FUTURE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE AND GLOBAL SEA LEVEL RISE

Transportation. Fueled by Clean Natural Gas

Fuel Cell Market Transformation

Building a Market for Small Wind: The Break-Even Turnkey Cost of Residential Wind Systems in the United States

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Weekly Progress Report on Recovery Act Spending

Planning and Operating an Integrated Grid

Creating Incentives for Electricity Providers to Integrate DER

Renewables Policy: A California Perspective

Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation

Broadband Technology Opportunities Program: Sustainable Broadband Adoption and Public Computer Centers

Renewable Choice Energy

A Discussion of PEM Fuel Cell Systems and Distributed Generation

Superstorm Sandy: Fuel Cell Design for Disaster Recovery vs. Backup Power

Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document

Prospects and Challenges for Fuel Cell Applications Paul Lebutsch

Cliffs and Ducks, Inverted Blocks and Spirals: Where Does Distributed Solar Go From Here?

State Clean Energy Fund Support for Renewable Energy Projects

Cella Energy Safe, low cost hydrogen storage. Chris Hobbs

A Study of Increased Use of Renewable Energy Resources in Virginia

Brighter Future: A Study on Solar in K-12 Schools. Wednesday February 4 th 2015

TOWARDS HYDROGEN ENERGY ECONOMY IN INDIA

Application of Fuel Cells to Fork Lift Trucks

A Technoeconomic Analysis of Biomethane Production from Biogas and Pipeline Delivery

Overview of Fuel Cell Programs in IPHE Countries. Dr. Stian Nygaard

Hydrogen Powered Bus Fleets Hydrogen Supply & Fueling. National Fuel Cell Bus Workshop October 5, New Orleans, LA

2012 Civic Natural Gas Retail & Fleet Markets. NGV Bridge Fleet Framework Summit March 26, 2013

Pet Coke Consulting, LLC. Phil Fisher Argus Conference, Houston September 19-21, 2012

5 kw Alkaline fuel cells target commercialization

Massachusetts $ Savings and Job Gains from Energy Efficiency in Buildings & Transportation

Fuel cells for long distance emobility: Content

HyPM Fuel Cell Power Modules

A Cost Comparison of Fuel-Cell and Battery Electric Vehicles

Presentation to Houston Advanced Research Center

Heat Pumps: An Untapped Resource For Energy Savings Programs. Regional and State-Level Economic Analysis of Heating Applications

Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Model Progress Presentation to the IPHE Workshop

Introduction to Hydrogenics Corporation

Power to Gas - an economic approach?

Enerdata - Global Energy Markets Insights and Analytics. CleanTuesday Rhône-Alpes Grenoble, 22 mars 2011

Dominion. Dan Weekley Vice President, Corporate Affairs. Dan Stoddard Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations. March 24, 2016

California Energy Commission California Perspective on Biofuels and Energy

Definition of effective metrics for evaluating the efficiency of hybrid power systems at telecom cell sites

RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARDS AND

Energy Offices Meeting

Clean Power Plan Clean Air Act 111(d) and 111(b) Rule. A Quick Comparison of What Changed

HBOX SOLAR 3A SOLAR POWERED ELECTROLYSER CASE STUDY 03

The Path to Commercial Fuel Cell Buses Applying Lessons from History (Audio not available)

MINNESOTA CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY PROFILE. How Industry Sectors are Advancing Economic Growth

Overview of UPS Strategy for Deployment of Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicles

Hydrogen Delivery in the Natural Gas Pipeline Network

Breakeven Cost for Residential Photovoltaics in the United States: Key Drivers and Sensitivities (Report Summary)

Propane as the Alternate Fuel for Fleets

Fuel Infrastructure Costs: electricity vs. hydrogen

RENAULT S EV STRATEGY

Advanced Fuel Cells A Reliable and Green Solution to Reduce Operating Expenses of Telecommunication Networks

hybrid fuel cell bus

Development of large-scale H 2 storage and transportation technology with Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)

New York State 2100 Commission Report: Energy

Well-to-Wheels analysis of future fuels and associated automotive powertrains in the European context. Preliminary Results for Hydrogen

Emerging Trends in Information. Impacting the States

Biggest Challenge for the Hydrogen Economy Hydrogen Production & Infrastructure Costs. Presentation Overview

HYDGROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

CONTINGENT COVERAGES AVAILABLE FOR AUTO LESSORS

High temperature electrolysis (SOEC) for the production of renewable fuels

California Energy Commission 2015 Accomplishments

Biomass-to-Fuel-Cell Power For Renewable Distributed Power Generation

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Electric Market National Overview

The Next Generation Near-Zero Emission Natural Gas Vehicles

Comparison of Recent Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in Japan, U.K., Germany and France

Addressing the U.S. Department of Defense Mission Assurance Concerns and Renewable Energy Mandates

Energy Storage. State Programs and the Energy Storage Technology Advancement Partnership (ESTAP) Todd Olinsky-Paul

The Future of Energy. Prof. Wesley Henderson Dept. Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering NC State University. Seminar 2

The Appraisal of Renewable Energy Facilities and Solar Installations

Well-to-Wheels Energy and Emission Impacts of Vehicle/Fuel Systems Development and Applications of the GREET Model

AmGUARD Insurance Company EastGUARD Insurance Company NorGUARD Insurance Company WestGUARD Insurance Company GUARD

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

New York City Water Summit. Future Water/Wastewater Issues Utility Perspective

Auto Insurance Underwriting/Rating

With Focus on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles

Delivering Energy Systems Solutions

Our New MIT Report: On the Road towards John B. Heywood Sloan Automotive Laboratory, M.I.T.

Combined Heat and Power: Economic, Proven, Reliable, Clean

The California Environmental Protection Agency works to restore, protect,

A R R A P R E S E N T A T I O N

State Solar Policy Trends in the Southeast. Amy Heinemann North Carolina Solar Center Georgia Tech Clean Energy Speakers Series May 26, 2010

310 Exam Questions. 1) Discuss the energy efficiency, and why increasing efficiency does not lower the amount of total energy consumed.

H.R Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007

Nokia Siemens Networks Sustainable Energy Solutions by Peter H. Hellmonds Corporate Affairs, Nokia Siemens Networks

H.R Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008

NAME AND ADDRESS ADDRESS CHANGE NO OPERATION AMENDED RETURN CANCEL LICENSE LICENSE INFORMATION

Transcription:

US Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Perspectives for Backup Power Applications Fuel Cell Technologies Office 1 Fuel Cell Backup Power for Telecommunication Base Stations Wuhan, P.R. China 5/29/2015 Dr. Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos Fuel Cells Program Manager Fuel Cell Technologies Office Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy

All of the Above Energy Strategy Fuel Cell Technologies Office 2 We ve got to invest in a serious, sustained, all-of-the-above energy strategy that develops every resource available for the 21st century. - President Barack Obama As part of an all of the above energy approach, fuel cell technologies are paving the way to competitiveness in the global clean energy market and to new jobs and business creation across the country. Secretary Moniz, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Moniz at DC Auto Show

Why Fuel Cells and Hydrogen? Fuel Cell Technologies Office 3 Natural Gas Renewable Sources Coal (With carbon sequestration) Nuclear Produces Hydrogen Clean Energy Carrier Fuel Fuel Cells Engines Turbines Biofuels Used for Industry Petroleum Recovery & refining Methanol, Ammonia & Metal Production Electronics/Cosmetics Food Processing > Energy storage for renewables Key component to a diversified and clean energy strategy

FCEVs Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Fuel Cell Technologies Office 4 >50% from Distributed Natural Gas* Well to Wheels CO 2 Emissions (in grams per mile) for 2035 Vehicles Technologies, except were indicated 2012 Gasoline Gasoline >80% from Renewables** (Wind) >90% from Renewables* (Wind) *Compared to 2012 gasoline vehicle **Compared to 2035 gasoline vehicle Distributed NG NG (Central) with Sequestration Coal Gasif. (Central) w/ Sequestration Biomass Gasif. (Central) Wind Electricity Substantial GHG reductions with H 2 produced from renewables

Market Growth in Fuel Cell Sales Fuel Cell Technologies Office 5 40,000 Fuel Cell Systems Shipped by Application >35,000 Fuel Cells Shipped in 2013 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Stationary Transportation Portable Navigant Research Consistent 30% annual growth since 2010

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Fuel Cell Technologies Office 6 Integrated Work Areas 2020 Targets by Application Fuel Cell Cost Durability $40/kW $1,000/kW* $1,500/kW** 5,000 hrs 80,000 hrs H 2 Storage Cost (On Board) $10/kWh 1.8 kwh/l, 1.3 kwh/kg H 2 Cost at Pump <$4/gge *For Natural Gas **For Biogas Integrated approach to widespread commercialization of H 2 and fuel cells

U.S. Department of Energy Role and Activities Fuel Cell Technologies Office 7 1. 2. 3. Research & Development Cost Reductions 50% for fuel cell systems $124/kW in 2006 Fuel Cell System Cost* Demonstration FCEV Demo >180 FCEVs 25 stations 3.6M miles World s first tri gen station GSE, back up power app. Deployment Lift Trucks 700 DOE cost shared deployments led to >7,500 additional purchases Emergency Back Up Power 900 DOE cost shared deployments led to 4,000 additional purchases $55/kW in 2014* at high volume *$280/kW low volume 80% for electrolyzers (since 2002) ~1600 >11,500 DOE cost shared deployments 2014 >7X Increase Additional purchases without DOE funding

U.S. Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Progress In R&D 50% Cost Reduction in FCEVs in the US: fuel cell systems Recently announced $124/kW in 2006 In the Market Now Leasing Fuel Cell Technologies Office 8 In Auto Shows *$280/kW low volume 2X 5X $55/kW today* at high volume Increase in fuel cell durability Platinum content reduction in fuel cells Public private partnership addressing infrastructure: 4X Increase in partners and growing since 2013 State Activities: 8 states committed to 3.3 million ZEVs by 2025 CA has committed to 100 H 2 stations Key Challenges Fuel Cell Cost and Durability Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Infrastructure Manufacturing and supply chain Safety codes and standards Widespread public acceptance

Hydrogen Safety Resources Fuel Cell Technologies Office 9 Phase 1 Spring 2015 Potential Future Tools Share your ideas! Compatibility of Materials Training for First Responders, Code Officials and Researchers User Group Networking Codes and Standards Tools Properties, Calculators & Bibliographic Database QRA Tools Lessons Learned and Best Safety Practices Other relevant information sources The Hydrogen Tools Portal provides a Centralized Location, Focused Content, a Customizable Interface and Responsive Design, Trusted Communities, and an Expandable Format

Fuel Cells for Backup Power: Technical Targets In the Market Fuel Cell Technologies Office 10 a. Time until 10% voltage degradation when operated on a backup power duty cycle. b. Ratio of DC output energy from the powerplant to the lower heating value of the input fuel (hydrogen), averaged over duty cycle. c. Time indicated is start-up time for the fuel cell. The backup power system, including hybridized batteries, is expected to provide uninterruptible power. d. Excludes tax credits and subsidies. * Technical Targets: Fuel Cell Backup Power Systems Operating on Direct H 2 Characteristic Units 2015 Status 2020 Targets Lifetime Years 10 15 Durability a hours 2,500 10,000 Energy efficiency b % 50 60 Mean time between failures years 5 5 Ambient temperature range C 20 to 40 50 to 50 Noise db at 1 m 65 60 Start up time c seconds 60 15 Availability % 99.7 96.3 Equipment cost d $ kw 1 3,000 1,000 Maintenance cost d $ kw 1 year 1 30 20 *Preliminary; developed with stakeholder input * http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/fuel cell technologies office multi year research development and 22

Market Transformation Deployments Fuel Cell Technologies Office 11 The funding of over 900 DOE fuel cell backup power systems has led to over 5,500 industry installations and on order backup power units with no DOE funding The 6,475 backup power fuel cell shipments and units on order equate to >32,000 kw of fuel cell systems

Fuel Cells Provide Resiliency to the Grid Fuel Cell Technologies Office 12 800 Fuel Cells for back up power deployed at cell phone towers providing electricity 1,000 during Power disruptions in 23 states AZ CA CO CT FL GA IL IN KY LA MA MI MS NV NJ NY NC OR SC TX UT WA WY During Hurricane Sandy the largest Atlantic hurricane on record 5sites operated providing power for over 100 hours as validated by NREL Source: "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Performance as Telecommunications Backup Power in the United States NREL/TP 5400 60730 1,034 out of 1,047 successful fuel cell starts for back up power

Independent Technology Assessment of DOE Funded Fuel Cell Backup Power Systems in Real World Operation Conditions Fuel Cell Technologies Office 13 NREL compiled backup power operation summary 2009 Q1 2013 Q4 Installed capacity in MW Systems are operating reliably in 23 states. Reasons for unsuccessful starts include an e stop signal, no fuel, and other system failures. Successful starts Systems in operation* Average site capacity in kw Start attempts 125 100 75 Continuous run hours demonstrated 50 25 0 Number of FC Units in State/Site Operation hours *Not all systems have detailed data reporting to NREL

Backup Power Cost of Ownership Analysis Fuel Cell Technologies Office 14 Objective Analysis of the annualized cost of ownership for backup power technologies in different annual runtime scenarios to evaluate the economic value proposition of fuel cell backup power systems. The ownership costs are based on operation lifetime, efficiency, maintenance, installation, fuel, and incentives. A detailed report on the assumptions, method, and results is available at: http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/cfm/pdfs/60732.pdf

Backup Power Cost of Ownership: Technology Comparison Fuel Cell Technologies Office 15 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 Annualized Cost of Ownership Battery Diesel FC FC* $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Battery Diesel FC FC* NREL cdp_bu_23 Created: Apr-07-14 10:05 AM Data Through: 2013Q4 8 Hours 52 Hours 72 Hours 176 Hours $6300 $24800 $31300 $67200 $4700 $4900 $4900 $5300 $5300 $6100 $6100 $8500 $4600 $5100 $5100 $7400 * Fuel cell system with incentives, calculated as 30% of expenditures and capped at $3,000/kW of system capacity Technologies are comparable at continuous 8-hour runtime and battery cost increases significantly for the higher operation scenarios

72 Hour Runtime Scenario Fuel Cell Technologies Office 16 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 Annualized Cost of Ownership 72-hour Scenario Fuel Maintenance Install Capital** $4900 $200 $800 $1800 $6100 $200 $100 $2200 $5100 $200 $100 $2200 $2,000 $1,000 $2100 $3600 $2600 $0 NREL cdp_bu_26 Created: Apr-07-14 10:05 AM Data Through: 2013Q4 Diesel FC FC* * Fuel cell system with incentives, calculated as 30% of expenditures and capped at $3,000/kW of system capacity **Includes capital costs for fuel storage Fuel cell system with incentives can be cost competitive with diesel generators

Backup Power Cost of Ownership Analysis: Summary & Outlook Fuel Cell Technologies Office 17 Diesel generator is one of the lower cost options, but with additional challenges including: cost of annual maintenance, noise, emissions, low efficiency, and/or poor reliability Battery system is likely selection for telecom sites requiring < 8 hours of run time Fuel cell capital and installation cost reduction will result in stronger value proposition Permitting of hydrogen systems, specifically the inconsistency of how requirements are implemented from site to site and how long the process takes needs development For decision makers initial cost is a key driver, but other aspects to consider are permitting, emissions, run time capability, ease of refueling, noise, footprint, and user comfort with the technology

Fuel Cells Addressing Backup Power: Hurricane Sandy Fuel Cell Technologies Office 18 Hurricane Sandy (October 2012) was the largest Atlantic hurricane on record. Winds spanning more than 1,100 miles More than $63 billion in damages

Impact of Super Storm Sandy on Telecom Fuel Cell Technologies Office 19 Major cell phone service disruption and power outages Wireless Telecommunications 25% of cell towers in 10 state area stopped operating Cellphone outages reported in more than 150 counties from Virginia to Massachusetts Many post Storm cellphone disruptions caused by battery or diesel backup generators running out of fuel before grid power restored

Fuel Cell Performance During Super Storm Sandy and Hurricane Irene Fuel Cell Technologies Office 20 Electricity Grid In the US, 22 of the 23 400 kw UTC Power (Doosan Fuel Cells) stationary fuel cells in the area provided continuous power to buildings. The only fuel cell to shut down was quickly restarted after a brief repair. Wireless Telecommunications In the Bahamas, all of Ballard s 17 ElectraGen ME systems operated continuously, producing more than 1,200 kwh of electricity. In the US, all of the 60+ Altergy s backup power systems operated flawlessly. The only wireless cell tower sites that remained operational after Hurricane Sandy were those with backup power fuel cell systems. During Hurricane Irene, all 56 ReliOn (Plug Power) systems installed at Sprint Sites operated throughout entire outage duration UTC Fuel Cells at Verizon Garden City Altergy Fuel Cell ReliOn Fuel Cells at Sprint

Fuel Cell Technologies Office 21 Thank you Dimitrios.Papageorgopoulos@ee.doe.gov http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/fuel cell technologies office

Backup Fuel Cell Technologies Office 22

Hydrogen Delivery and Onboard Storage Costs Fuel Cell Technologies Office 23 Delivery Costs: Compression, Storage and Dispensing (CSD) Cost Breakdown for the Pipeline Scenario ($2.40/kg total)** Storage On board Storage Costs: 700 bar system cost breakdown at 500,000 systems/year Storage $0.27 Cooling $0.22 Precursor Fiber 31% BOP & Assembly 30% Dispensing $0.17 Compression Compression $1.54 Compression Other $0.16 Conversion 26% Other Processing 7% Resin 6% Compression and Storage comprise approximately 75% of CSD costs when delivered via pipeline Composite materials account for >60% of total storage tank system cost Carbon fiber precursor is the largest single cost contributor. Delivery costs: ~$2.40 to $5/gge vs. Target of $2/gge by 2020 Onboard 700 bar storage costs: ~$17/kWh vs. Target of $10/kWh by 2020 (high volume)

Hydrogen Production: Cost Status Fuel Cell Technologies Office 24 Costs analyses provide information that allows for informed, prioritization of funding. Some results indicate major cost drivers are outside the scope of FCTO portfolio. Distributed PEM Electrolysis Other, 1% BDL Reforming Other, 1% Capital, 26% Capital, 12% O&M, 4% Feedstock, 65% O&M, 8% Feedstock, 83%

Current Status of H 2 Storage Technologies Fuel Cell Technologies Office 25 Storage Targets 2020 Ultimate Gravimetric kwh/kg (kg H 2 /kg system) 1.8 (0.055) 2.5 (0.075) Volumetric kwh/l (kg H 2 /L system) 1.3 (0.040) 2.3 (0.070) Costs $/kwh ($/kg H 2 ) $10 ($333) $8 ($266) Full comprehensive sets of hydrogen storage targets can be found in the Program s Multi year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan: http://energy.gov/sites/p rod/files/2014/03/f12/st orage.pdf Projected H 2 Storage System Performance (5.6 kg H 2 usable) Gravimetric kwh/kg Volumetric kwh/l Costs* $/kwh 700 bar compressed (Type IV) 1.5 0.8 17 350 bar compressed (Type IV) 1.8 0.6 13 Metal Hydride (NaAlH 4 /Ti) 0.4 0.4 43 Sorbent (MOF 5, 100 bar) MATI, LN2 cooling [HexCell, flow through cooling] Chemical Hydrogen Storage (AB 50 wt.%) [AlH 3 60 wt.%] 1.2 [1.2] 1.5 [1.1] 0.7 [0.6] 1.4 [1.2] 16 [15] 17 [22] 700 bar and 350 bar compressed H 2 system projections based on 2013 Program Record #13010 Materials based system projections from Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (5/2015) * Projected to 500,000 units / year

Market Transformation Challenges Fuel Cell Technologies Office 26 To test emerging applications at the Technology Readiness Level (TRLs) 6 9 level to expand user and servicing expertise To test new technology applications in user operating conditions to establish baseline energy efficiency and reliability performance and determine commercial viability Examples: A 1-kW fuel cell system providing power for this FAA radio tower near Chicago (Photo courtesy of ReliOn/Plug Power) Material Handling Equipment at work in U.S. airports (Photo courtesy of Hydrogenics) 26

Market Transformation Deployments Fuel Cell Technologies Office 27 DOE investment in lift trucks and back up power has lead to thousands of industry installations. Lift Truck Deployments 8,340 9,033 The successful deployment of nearly 700 DOE fuel cell material handling units has led to over 13,500 industry installation and on order units with no DOE funding. 6000 504 189 693 Back Up Power Deployments 5568 6,475 The funding of 907 DOE fuel cell backup power systems has led to over 5,500 industry installations and on order backup power units with no DOE funding. 3500 824 907 83

Impact of Super Storm Sandy Electricity Grid Outages Fuel Cell Technologies Office 28 8.5 million power outages reported across 21 states 65% of New Jersey utility customers lost power 2.6 million homes and businesses 25% of West Virginia utility customers lost power

Accomplishments: MHE Operation Summary 2009 Q4 2014 Q3 Fuel Cell Technologies Office 29 Validation of MHE is based on real world operation data from high use facilities. Operation hours Hydrogen fills Units in operation* Average operation hours between fills Hydrogen dispensed in kg Average fill amount in kg *One project has completed. Only ARRA locations shown Average fill time in minutes