egovernment Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014

Similar documents
Digital Agenda Targets Progress report. Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014

Online job search in the EU: The potential of web 2.0

Khalil ROUHANA Director. Directorate-General for Information Society European Commission

Study on comparison tools and third-party verification schemes

Digital Inclusion and Skills. Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014


European developments in VET Quality Assurance

European Commission Agenda for Quality and Innovation in Public Administration

EN 106 EN 4. THE MOBILE USE OF THE INTERNET BY INDIVIDUALS AND ENTERPRISES Introduction

The EU Energy Tax Directive: overview about the proposed reform, impacts on national measures and state of play

Your first EURES job. Progress Summary 2014Q4. March 2015

ehealth in support of safety, quality and continuity of care within and across borders

Measuring Quality of life in the European Union

SURVEY ON THE TRAINING OF GENERAL CARE NURSES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. The current minimum training requirements for general care nurses

The EU s 2030 Effort Sharing Agreement

Hotel Industry VAT in EU

The ICT workforce and e-leadership demand and supply ( )

MM, EFES EN. Marc Mathieu

Social dumping and free movement: Overview of current issues from an economic point of view

ENTERING THE EU BORDERS & VISAS THE SCHENGEN AREA OF FREE MOVEMENT. EU Schengen States. Non-Schengen EU States. Non-EU Schengen States.

The Evidence Base on Lifelong Guidance

Czech Universities and the Environment for Innovation. Rudolf Hanka

EUROPEANS SATISFACTION WITH RAIL SERVICES

telephone television internet 3-play (i + t + tv) 2-play 2-play (i+t) (t+tv) 2-play (i+tv)

How To Study The Small Ruminant Population In The European Land Animals

Rolling out eidas Regulation (EU) 910/2014. Boosting trust & security in the Digital Single Market

THE ROLE OF PUBLIC SUPPORT IN THE COMMERCIALISATION OF INNOVATIONS

INNOBAROMETER THE INNOVATION TRENDS AT EU ENTERPRISES

KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY CHALLENGES FOR LIFEONG LEARNING

TEPZZ 87_546A T EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G05B 19/05 ( )

EUROPEAN YOUTH: PARTICIPATION IN DEMOCRATIC LIFE

Common Communication on the Common Practice on the General Indications of the Nice Class Headings v1.1, 20 February 2014

Family Law. Fieldwork: June 2006 Report: October 2006

European judicial training Justice

Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in Schools

Comparison of annuity markets (OECD National Annuity Markets: Features and Implications, Rusconi 2008) Mercer

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: EARLY LEAVERS FROM EDUCATION AND TRAINING

European Research Council

Dublin, March EPSO Network of Experts in the field of Personnel Selection 14th March 2013

Doro PhoneEasy 331ph

European Research Council

Discussion paper on criteria applied by EU Member States to establish lists of non-cooperative jurisdictions

Level crossing signs from the view of road users in Europe. Tamás Déri Hungarian NSA

ERMInE Database. Presentation by Nils Flatabø SINTEF Energy Research. ERMInE Workshop 2 - Northern Europe Oslo, 1. November 2006

A Zero Waste Vision for Europe: management of resources and the key role of biowaste

OVERVIEW OF PURCHASE AND TAX INCENTIVES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE EU

THE FUTURE OF TELEVISION IN EUROPE

EUROPEAN AREA OF SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

User language preferences online. Analytical report

Voluntary health insurance and health care reforms

the EU framework programme for research and innovation

SME Instrument statistics

Funding of debt-advice across the EU

CO2 BASED MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES IN THE EU IN 2015

The Legal Service of the European Commission. March

Private Sector Debt Dívida do Sector Privado. dossiers. Economic Outlook Conjuntura Económica. Conjuntura Económica.

Milk Market Situation. Brussels, 27 August 2015

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2013 CHAPTER 3

The case for a European Social Union. From muddling through to a sense of common purpose. Frank Vandenbroucke EIB Institute Luxembourg, 5 March 2015

Volume Trends in EU Postal Markets

GUIDANCE for Administration of the Sunset Clause

Broadband markets Digital Agenda Scoreboard

EUROPEAN SEMESTER THEMATIC FICHE ACCESS TO FINANCE

72/ April 2015

Macro-prudential instruments in Slovakia. Štefan Rychtárik Národná banka Slovenska

Implementing the cooperation mechanisms of the RES directive current status and open questions

The coverage rate of social benefits. Research note 9/2013

Finnish foreign trade 2014 Figures and diagrams FINNISH CUSTOMS Statistics 1

OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH PROJECTS IN THE ICT DOMAIN ICT statistical report for annual monitoring (StReAM)

ERGP (12) 33 ERGP report on data collection ERGP REPORT WITH DATA ON INDICATORS ON THE POSTAL MARKET

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE EU

Public Debt and Contingent Liabilities: A Cross-Country Comparison

Title (fr) SOURCE IONIQUE INTERNE DOUBLE POUR PRODUCTION DE FAISCEAU DE PARTICULES AVEC UN CYCLOTRON

E-COMMUNICATIONS HOUSEHOLD SURVEY

Improving Teacher Quality the EU agenda

EU Energy Efficiency Policy: 2020 and Beyond. Claudia Canevari Directorate-General for Energy Unit C3 Energy Efficiency eceee Summer Study

SURVEY OF SCHOOLS: ICT IN EDUCATION COUNTRY PROFILE: CZECH REPUBLIC

EUROPEAN CITIZENS DIGITAL HEALTH LITERACY

Overview of VoD services in the EU & Future developments. Europa International Athens, 23 rd November 2013

I have asked for asylum in the EU which country will handle my claim?

Professor Heikki Ervasti University of Turku Department of Social Research

Towards a safer use of the Internet for children in the EU a parents perspective. Analytical report

Export of unemployment benefits

THE 2015 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD

Cable Industry Facts: the story behind the numbers

HOW COMPANIES INFLUENCE OUR SOCIETY: CITIZENS VIEW

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology

Tackling undeclared work in the European Union and the EU candidate countries. Barbara Gerstenberger Eurofound

ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS BUILDING THE SINGLE MARKET FOR GREEN PRODUCTS

Transcription:

egovernment Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014 1

egovernment use in EU28 has been flat In 2013 egovernment services have been used by 41% of the EU28 population, down from 44% in 2012 and almost at the same level as in 2011. Currently only 9 out of 28 countries are above the 2015 target, namely DK, NL, SE, FI, FR, LU, AT, SI, BE (although DE and EE are also close to it) and only 7 countries have seen usage increasing in 2013. In five countries (RO, IT, BG, PL and HR) online public services are used by less than a quarter of the population with generally little progress in term of catching-up (and even some big drops like in RO and PL). Our target Half the population using egovernment by 2015 Current performance 41% in 2013 egovernment use by citizens in the last 12 months 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2012 2013 Source: EUROSTAT DK NL SE FI FR LU AT SI BE DE EE IE ES EU28 UK PT HU EL LV LT SK MT CY CZ HR PL BGIT RO 2

Internet-savvy citizens often use the Internet to contact public administrations, but less so to conclude more complex interactions. Almost three quarters (73.3%) of Internet users (in the last 12 months) who needed to contact a public authority (or to use a public service) did so online in 2013. A quarter of these used exclusively the Internet, while the others used also other channels of interaction. 26.7% of the internet users contacted their public administrations without using the Internet at all. The preferred offline channels of interaction were personal visits (54%), telephone (50%), email (25%) and other methods (e.g. SMS, post, 20%). Internet users (in the last 12 months) contacting public authorities through the online and offline channels (EU28, 2013) contacted PAs only online contacted PAs both online and offline contacted PAs only offline Source: Commission calculations based on EUROSTAT data 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Citizens (internet users in the last 12 months) needing to send official forms to public authorities forms sent through the internet forms sent offline However, when more advanced interaction is required, Internet users are less likely to carry this out online. In 2013, among Internet users who needed to submit official forms to public authorities, only 52%* did so via Internet, down from 53% in the previous year 0% 2013 2012 Source: Commission calculations based on EUROSTAT data *The EU28 aggregate in 2013 does not include IT, LV and PL for which no data on need to submit forms was available 3

Users of egovernment services are in general satisfied, while the main reason for nonuse is a lack of trust Citizens sending filled forms online and level of satisfaction with egovernment services Once citizens start to use online public services, they generally find the experience highly satisfying (75%), with only a minority feeling very disappointed (8%). The most appreciated feature is the usefulness of information (87% mainly satisfied), followed by the ease of finding information (84%), the ease of using online services (79%) and the transparency/follow-up (75%). 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% high satisfaction (i_igov12rt_sidx_hi) Source: EUROSTAT medium satisfaction (i_igov12rt_sidx_me) low satisfaction (i_igov12rt_sidx_lo) Reasons for not using the online channel for submitting official forms Personal contact is missing, prefer visits Individuals trust submitting by paper The relevant services will require Individuals' concerns about protection Immediate response is missing Another person did it on behalf of the Other reasons Individuals' lack of skills or knowledge There was no such website service 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Source: Commission calculations based on EUROSTAT data Lack of trust seems to be the main source of nonuse. It comes in several forms: a preference for personal contact (41%), higher trust for paper submissions (30%), concern about personal data (19%), and a lack of immediate feedback (16%). Other main factors of non-use are a lack of skills and an incomplete digitalization of government services. The Commission, via the ISA programme, has taken up actions to help Member States strengthen interoperability between public services. 4

The measurement of egovernment supply, some methodological notes The supply side of egovernment is measured through a user journey approach. This is undertaken by researchers acting as mystery shoppers, that is, by posing as ordinary users of egovernment services. The mystery shoppers simulate an event in the life of the citizen/entrepreneur requiring administrative action from the government (e.g. a marriage) and then go through public authorities websites in order to fulfil the related administrative requirements through the online channel when possible. Seven of these life events are analysed in the course of two years (the first complete measurement is from 2012-2013) in different government domains: - losing/finding a job - enrolling to university - moving - starting a small claim procedure - buying/owning a car - starting a business - regular business operations Different aspects of service provision are examined in this new methodology, but the two examined here are the following : Usercentric egovernment and Transparent egovernment. The User-Centric egovernment indicator measures the availability of egovernment services, their connectedness and their user-friendliness. The Transparent egovernment indicator measures the online transparency of governments on the different aspects of online service delivery, treatment of citizens' personal data and activities of the public administrations. Both indicators range from 0 (complete absence of required features) to 100 (all features included). The source for the egovernment supply data is the egovernment Benchmark Report (see https://ec.europa.eu/digitalagenda/news-redirect/16475) Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014 5

On the supply side signs are more encouraging but important steps still need to be taken to improve transparency and win citizens trust User-Centric egovernment in the EU (2012-2013) The results for EU28 show that for many countries the provision of user-friendly services is already a reality in most government domains, although on average there is still distance from the digital by default approach (a score of 100). Some countries still score 50 or less, displaying a rather analogue approach to public service delivery (SK, RO, HU, EL). 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 T T S E M P E I E I F T L E A N S K D I T R F L V L T L E P B Source: egovernment Benchmark Report 8 K 2 S I U D E L U B G C Y C Z H R E L U H U R O S K E 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Transparent egovernment in the EU (2012-2013) T E T T M P A L T S E R F F I L V S E D K S I N L B E I T I E E U28 H R U K B G P L L U C Y D E C Z H U E L S K R O Source: egovernment Benchmark Report Transparency is an important element for increasing the takeup of online public services, since it helps building trust of citizens in public administrations. The data show that this important feature is still not sufficiently at the center of egovernment strategies for many governments, with few exceptions. 6