Agronomy Notes Vol. 30 No. 3. Escherichia coli Pathogen O157:H7 Does Not Survive Longer In Soil Than A Nonpathogenic Fecal Coliform

Similar documents
Testing Waste Water for Fecal Coliforms and/or E.coli using Colilert and Colilert -18 & Quanti-Tray

Quantifying Bacterial Concentration using a Calibrated Growth Curve

UTILIZATION of PLASMA ACTIVATED WATER in Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Medicine. JSC TECHNOSYSTEM-ECO Moscow, Russia April, 2009

BACTERIA COUNTS IN RAW MILK

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

R. Landstorfer et al. BMC Genomics, Audrey Segura

Laboratory Exercise # 11: Differentiation of the Species Staphylococcus and Streptococcus

GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING OF SPENT MYCELIUM FROM BULK DRUG INDUSTRY

Division of Epidemiology, Environmental and Occupational Health Consumer and Environmental Health Services

Lab 10: Bacterial Transformation, part 2, DNA plasmid preps, Determining DNA Concentration and Purity

Biological Sciences Initiative

Contaminant. Publication Order Number. EPA Publication Number. Method. Date. Source of Method. Total Coliforms

Causes of Bacteria in Water Samples 1

Enzymes: Amylase Activity in Starch-degrading Soil Isolates

Bacterial Transformation with Green Fluorescent Protein. Table of Contents Fall 2012

Acknowledgements. Developing collaborative lab experiments across disciplines through the identification of bacteria

ENUMERATION OF MICROORGANISMS. To learn the different techniques used to count the number of microorganisms in a sample.

Test Method for the Continuous Reduction of Bacterial Contamination on Copper Alloy Surfaces

Water Quality For Poultry

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Microbiological Testing of the Sawyer Mini Filter. 16 December Summary

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Upgrading of Agro-wastes to Straw Mushroom by Radiation

Enumerating Chromogenic Agar Plates Using the Color QCOUNT Automated Colony Counter

SELECTIVE AND DIFFERENTIAL MEDIA

Technique for Testing Drinking Water

1.0 XRF Analyses Performance Evaluation

Approaches to Infection Control

Detailed Information for Escherichia coli

Quantifying Bacteria Levels in Water Categories 1 3

Poultry manure as a substrate for methane fermentation: problems and solutions

Food Processing: Understanding and Controlling E. Coli Contamination

How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources?

BIOREMEDIATION: A General Outline Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.

Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes.

Community Psychology Master program at Birzeit University, Palestine

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

Transferring a Broth Culture to Fresh Broth

NUTRITION AND GROWTH OF BACTERIA

Chapter 1 Key Themes in Environmental Science

LAB 4. Cultivation of Bacteria INTRODUCTION

The European database of non-human VTEC strains

Enteric Septicemia of Catfish

DIGESTION is the physical and

Microbiology BIOL 275 DILUTIONS

Testing of disinfectants

ph is an expression of the concentration of hydrogen ions in solution

Title: Call center and answering services for the medical & home health care industry

SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT BASICS. Organic Soil Amendments and Fertilizers

Feed Management Plan Template ( ) Address: Address: Town, State, Zip: Homer City. Farm Name: Phone: Fax:

Personal Injury TYPES OF HOLIDAY ILLNESSES. Telephone

Subsurface Transport of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Soils of Wisconsin s Carbonate Aquifer Region

Bioremediation. Introduction

Welcome to Implementing Inquirybased Microbial Project. Veronica Ardi, PhD

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

STATUS REPORT: Bacteria and Other Contaminants in Domestic Water Wells in the Jackson Purchase Region

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Asafe water supply is essential for healthy livestock

Enteric Unknowns Miramar College Biology 205 Microbiology

Assessment of Natural Biodegradation at Petroleum Release Sites Guidance Document 4-03

The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)

BACTERIAL ENUMERATION

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP): Genetic Transformation, Synthesis and Purification of the Recombinant Protein

Reducing the Risk of Ground Water Contamination by Improving Livestock Holding Pen Management

High deleterious genomic mutation rate in stationary phase of Escherichia coli

Isolation of Starch degrading bacteria Enzymes in Action

GROWING BACTERIA INTRODUCTION

Analytical Methods Approved for Compliance Monitoring under the Ground Water Rule

FACTS. Nitrate and Nitrite in Drinking Water. What Are Nitrate and Nitrite? 3. How Can These Chemicals Get into Your Drinking Water?

Frank Mitloehner, PhD Air Quality CE Specialist Animal Science, UC Davis

Transformation of the bacterium E. coli. using a gene for Green Fluorescent Protein

Mystic River Watershed Association Water Quality Monitoring: Malden River May 28 th 2002

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

GOLDEN ENVIRO HERBA- EXTRACT DRAIN CLOG FREE. Pleasant lemon fragrance provides instant freshness Patented microbial technology

Exercise V. Bacterial Cultural Characteristics or Morphology

Validation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Detection Kit in Raw and Post-Processed Aquaculture Food Products

A little information goes a long way

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Bird and bat droppings

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

Pasteurized Milk and Colostrum for Calves: An Option or Necessity?

Induction of Enzyme Activity in Bacteria:The Lac Operon. Preparation for Laboratory: Web Tutorial - Lac Operon - submit questions

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

Lab Exercise 3: Media, incubation, and aseptic technique

Transformation Protocol

AFDO 2010, Norfolk, VA James Marsden Regents Distinguished Professor Jasdeep Saini Kansas State University

Watershed Education for Teachers. Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

Disc Diffusion Susceptibility Methods

Predictive microbiological models

BOIL WATER NOTICE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

DRAFT Changes to 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252 For Discussion Purposes Only January 21, 2015 CHAPTER 252. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

Science in the Real World Microbes In Action

1 Heap Leach Mine in Central New Mexico

Food Safety Issues Arising at Food Production in a Global Market

Transcription:

1 Agronomy Notes Vol. 30 No. 3 Escherichia coli Pathogen O157:H7 Does Not Survive Longer In Soil Than A Nonpathogenic Fecal Coliform Introduction D.N. Mubiru, M.S. Coyne, and J.H. Grove Survival rates for individual types of fecal organisms are quite different. Although some pathogens may persist as long as 5 years in soil, most fecal pathogens from human and animal waste usually die very quickly. Two to three months is sufficient in most cases to reduce pathogens to negligible numbers once they have been excreted or land-applied in animal wastes. It is expensive and timeconsuming to test for individual pathogens. Consequently, nonpathogenic fecal indicator bacteria, which are easily and inexpensively detected, are often used to study pathogen survival in soil and water. Current methods for rapidly detecting fecal indicator bacteria use the capacity of fecal coliforms (e.g. Escherichia coli ) to metabolize a fluorescent indicator compound, 4-methylumbelliferyl ß-D-glucuronide (MUG ) as evidence for fecal contamination. Some fecal coliforms are unable to hydrolyze MUG, which means they give false negative responses to this quick test. Among the E. coli strains with a MUG negative response is the virulent enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) pathogen designated as O157:H7. Strain O157:H7 is widely spread and has been found in birds, cattle, deer, dogs, horses, sheep, and swine. It is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and fewer than 100 bacteria can cause illness. O157:H7 is the predominant EHEC strain in the U.S. and has caused several deaths by kidney failure due to contaminated drinking water, food, and recreational swimming pools. The very young and elderly are the most susceptible groups at risk from this pathogen, although all ages can be affected. The consequences of virulent fecal coliforms persisting in the environment are serious, but comparative studies relating the survival in soil of pathogenic E. coli strains, such as O157:H7, to typical nonvirulent indicator fecal coliforms are lacking. This study was therefore conducted to compare the mortality of E. coli O157:H7 and a nonvirulent E. coli strain in two Kentucky soils.

2 Methods The experiment design was a 2 x 2 factorial with replication, which compared two soils and two bacteria strains. Pope silt loam and Zanesville silt loam, which differ in physical and chemical properties, were used in the study (Table 1). Escherichia coli strain O157:H7 and a nonvirulent E. coli strain were prepared by growing cultures in a nutrient broth. The cells were harvested, washed, resuspended, and then added to air dried, nonsterile, soil. The final soil water content was 20% by weight. There were no detectable fecal or total coliforms in the soils before adding the bacteria. The inoculated soil was subdivided among polyethylene bags and stored at 77 F (25 C) for the duration of the experiment. Escherichia coli were enumerated from three replicate samples every week for 8 weeks using a most probable number method. Ten grams of soil from each sample were serially diluted in 10-fold steps until no bacteria remained. Culture tubes containing media that revealed activity by E. coli were inoculated from each soil and dilution. Escherichia coli presence was identified after incubation at 95 F (35 C) for 48 h and their numbers were determined based on the dilutions at which E. coli were no longer present. Escherichia coli death was modeled by the linear equation: log10a = -kt + constant where A = the E. coli population, k = the death rate, and t = time. The data are reported as the half life (t1/2), the time required for half the E. coli population to disappear. A simple regression was performed on this linear equation to calculate the best-fit for the data and determine whether more complex models were required to adequately describe E. coli mortality. Results and Discussion

3 Figure 1 shows the E. coli population as a function of days of incubation. Both strains had similar survival patterns in the individual soils. However, there were big differences in the survival pattern between soils. Bacteria populations typically disappeared more rapidly in Pope soil than Zanesville soil. Exchangeable bases, soil organic matter, and total nitrogen, which have been associated with increased fecal bacteria survival in soil, were generally greater in Pope soil than Zanesville soil. However, in the first week, die-off in Pope soil was apparent, while both strains evidently regrew in Zanesville soil. Although both soils had silt loam textures, Pope soil had twice as much clay as Zanesville soil (Table 1). One reason that E. coli death began immediately in Pope soil was probably because the higher clay content created greater water stress than in Zanesville soil, even though both soils had the same initial gravimetric water content. There was not a significant difference in the half lives of the two strains in either soil. Both strains died off faster in Pope silt loam than Zanesville silt loam. The half life of O157:H7 in Pope silt loam was 1.8 days and that of the nonvirulent E. coli strain was 2.2 days (Table 2). In Zanesville silt loam, the half life of O157:H7 was 2.7 days and that of the nonvirulent strain was 3.3 days. These mortality rates are somewhat higher than have been observed in labortory and field studies of survival and probably reflect the use of laboratory cultures rather than fresh animal wastes as the source of E. coli. The E. coli in dairy manure applied to no-till or chisel disk soils in spring and fall, for example, have half lives of 7 to 8 days. Although E. coli death in soil could be described as a single stage process, the reduction in bacteria numbers was better described when it was separated into two stages. The mortality rate constants derived from a two-stage model indicated that the initial mortality rates depended on soil type whereas the subsequent mortality rates depended on the E. coli strain. The initial mortality rates compared to the subsequent mortality rates indicated that soil type had a greater effect on mortality than the type of E. coli strain. Based on the calculated mortality rates, between 40 and 60 days would be required for 99.9% of the added E. coli to be eliminated from either soil under these soil conditions. If the soil environment were drier, we would anticipate much more rapid mortality rates from both bacterial strains. Conversely,

4 the literature suggests that if soil conditions were wetter and cooler than we have described, mortality rates would decline and the bacteria in soil would persist longer. However, the comparative mortality rates we have described for these E. coli strains should be unaffected by changes in soil environmental conditions. Conclusions It is generally accepted that fecal indicator microorganisms are affected in the same manner as pathogens in soil. In most studies they seem to survive longer than pathogens. In this study, the nonvirulent, MUG positive E. coli strain consistently had longer half lives and therefore survived in higher numbers than the pathogen O157:H7. However, the differences were not statistically significant. This suggests that the pathogen O157:H7 is unlikely to predominate in soil environments and increase the risk that fecal contamination of an environment is undetected. Rapid tests for E. coli detection in soil and conservative preventive measures after their detection should be adequate to minimize health risks due to fecal contamination of soil and groundwater, even though some potential E. coli strains, such as O157:H7, elude detection by these methods. Although the overall regression coefficients from a single stage model were relatively high, the mortality rate constants derived from the model appeared to underestimate E. coli persistence in the two soils tested. As a matter of public health, a more conservative approach is to use a two-stage model, which seems to be a better predictor of the survival of E. coli in soil than a single stage model.

5 Table 1. Soil physical and chemical characteristics prior to E. coli addition. Characteristic Pope silt loam Zanesville silt loam Texture (%) Clay 25 12 Silt 59 67 Sand 16 21 ph 5.6 5.5 Mehlich III extractable (mg kg -1 ) Ca 1379 980 Mg 155 74 K 85 44 P 21 14 Zn 13 2 Total N (mg kg -1 ) 1510 1000 Soil organic matter (%) 2.8 1.7

6 Table 2. Half lives of E. coli strains in Pope and Zanesville silt loams. Half lives (days) Single stage model Two stage model Soil Strain Stage 1 Stage 2 Pope Nonpathogen 2.2 (0.89) 1.4 (0.94) 5.0 (0.96) O157:H7 1.8 (0.93) 1.2 (0.99) 3.9 (0.99) Zanesville Nonpathogen 3.3 (0.90) 1.8 (0.97) 6.0 (0.95) O157:H7 2.7 (0.93) 2.0 (0.87) 4.3 (0.94) The regression coefficient for goodness of fit, r 2, is noted in parentheses after each half life.

Figure 1. Mortality of E. coli strains in two soils with different physical and chemical characteristics