Mr Sten Björk. Project leader Cleanship

Similar documents
waste management Ship-generated Ellen Kaasik Head of Quality and Environmental Management Department

PORT OF TRELLEBORG, PORT OF HELSINKI

Clean Shipping. A Priority Area of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

Lucienne Damm, Environmental Manager, TUI Cruises Kiel, June 30 th 2016

What does mandatory shore power in EU mean?

HELCOM perspective on clean Baltic Sea shipping. Helsinki Commission

PREVENTION OF MARINE LITTER POLLUTION

Future environmental regulations for shipping in the Baltic Sea area and their consequences for the seaports

Prevention Pollution by Garbage from Ships in China. E Hailiang Deputy Director Maritime Safety Administration People s s Republic of China

Facts about the onshore power supply at the Port of Oslo

Shore Connection The technology of Onshore Power supply

REVISED CONSOLIDATED FORMAT FOR REPORTING ALLEGED INADEQUACIES OF PORT RECEPTION FACILITIES

Ports of Stockholm meets new environmental requirements with LNG

Merchant Marine Circular No. 178

KEY FACTORS AND BARRIERS TO THE ADOPTION OF COLD IRONING IN EUROPE

SOx - FUEL CHANGE MANUAL. Manual No. 01

Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78. Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships

Technical Bulletin. Oil Record Book entries: Machinery space operations (Part 1) Including January 2011 amendments to Technical Bulletin 24

GUIDELINES FOR VOLUNTARY USE OF THE SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL INDICATOR (EEOI)

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Sulphur Content in Marine Fuels

ROOD BOVEN GROEN GARBAGE RECORD BOOK FOR ALL NAUTICAL AFFAIRS CONSULTING TRAINING SHIPMANAGEMENT. Name of ship: Distinctive number or letters:

Examining the Commercial Viability of Cold Ironing

MU Cooling System. Hi-Pres. Low sulphur fuel cooling system. System specifications HI-PRES MARINE & OFFSHORE

Exhaust Scrubbers. What you need to know. Move Forward with Confidence

GREEN SHORTSEA SHIPPING The shipowners perspective Juan Riva President European Community Shipowners Associations ECSA Flota Suardíaz

Discharge of Water & Waste from Marine Vessels Standards & Regulations (MARPOL Convention)

Centre for Oceans Law & Policy Global Challenges and Freedom of Navigation. Panel VI: Balancing Marine Environment and Freedom of Navigation

12 November 2008 *** I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\642.DOC INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR

Bunkers Regulatory and Practical Considerations. Piraeus, 8 November 2012 Capt. Simon Rapley

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Copyright 2012 Mayekawa Mfg. Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

14th October BSSSC 2009 Conference at Ringsted, Denmark 1

IMO WORK PROGRAMME OF THE COMMITTEE AND SUBSIDIARY BODIES

Triple Bottom Line Socioeconomic Benefits of the West Creek Hydropower Project

A Competitive European Shipping Industry

ENVIRONMENTAL PORT INDEX

General Information for Ship Owners to obtain the International Air Pollution Prevention certificate according to MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI

SAFE ADRIA Project Action Plan Pag. 1. SAFE ADRIA Project. Action Plan

IMO REQUIREMENTS FROM JULY 2015 TO JULY 2018 INCLUSIVE

> Capital Markets Day 2011

Technical Interpretation by the Administration

Session 4 Progress on Major Oceans and Climate Issues. Curbing Air Pollution from Ships, Geo-engineering Issues

CHP and DHC in Helsinki

Appendix I. Description of Work

Port Early Warning and Alert Systems

How To Reduce Energy Efficiency On Ships

Green Ship of the Future

Energy efficient electric ferry concept - challenges and business opportunities

ANNEX 5 RESOLUTION MEPC.127(53) Adopted on 22 July 2005 GUIDELINES FOR BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (G4)

CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES

Implementing a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) Guidance for shipowners and operators

INTERPRETATIONS OF, AND AMENDMENTS TO, MARPOL AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS. Management of boiler/economizer washdown water

How To Build An Lng Fuel Tank Container

Ferry Solutions by Wärtsilä

NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE EMBRACES THE ENVIRONMENT AS A CORE VALUE

Fee tariff for services of Port of Gdansk Authority SA

The Merchant Shipping (Port State Control) Regulations 2011

Procedure Manual. Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP)

REGULATION on the Maritime Traffic Service and vessel traffic monitoring and information system.

REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION OF AND RESPONSE TO MARINE POLLUTION FROM SHIPS

SO X SCRUBBER TECHNOLOGY

EMISSIONS FROM MARINE ENGINES VERSUS IMO CERTIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF TIER 3

Part 0 - Classification and Surveys Classification and Surveys I

Viking Grace 20 months' experience of Ship to Ship LNG bunkering

Monitoring Air Emissions on Ships. Restricted Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

Baltic Sea Sewage Port Reception Facilities

Fjord Line AS a company running on LNG. Presentation, Thursday March 5th 2015

Ballast Water Management WÄRTSILÄ AQUARIUS BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Marpol 73/78 Annex VI Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships. Technical and Operational implications

Frequently Asked Questions

Onshore Power Supply (OPS) Survey

Frequently asked questions

IMO. REVIEW OF MARPOL ANNEX VI AND THE NO x TECHNICAL CODE. Development of Standards for NO x, PM, and SO x. Submitted by the United States

PORT OF HELSINKI LTD SOUTH HARBOUR WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

HELCOM Ministerial Declaration

Toxic Municipal Waste Water Treatment

COMPARISON OF MARINE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Challenges and Opportunities. Niels Bjørn Mortensen Maersk Maritime Technology

Uniform Application of MARPOL Annex I, Revised Regulation 12

CIMAC Guideline

Exhaust Emissions from Ship Engines in Australian Waters Including Ports

Issues and measures for use of low-sulfur fuel oil

Guidance on the Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Port Waste Reception Facilities) Regulations 2003 and amendments

Oily Water Separators

Assessment of the Port of Abidjan

Results from the Baltic Biogas Bus project

CONCEPT FOR ACTIVITY 1: DYNAMIC & PROACTIVE ROUTES OR GREEN-ROUTES

Vessels reporting duties on the NSR

Partnerskab for Grøn Skibsfart - Status og fremtidsudsigter LNG - Status på projekter og EU-initiativer

ANNEX XV APPROXIMATION

Foreword. Olof Widén Managing Director The Finnish Shipowners Association

Marine Generating Sets 3.7 to 50 kva

London International Shipping Week. 10 September 2015

Alfa Laval Slide 3

The City of Boulder 75 th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility

Cruise Liners. Prices and terms Port of Stockholm and Nynäshamn. Version

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE NETHERLANDS

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Transcription:

Mr Sten Björk Project leader Cleanship

Sewage and eutrophication The Baltic Sea - world s largest brackish water basins and ecologically unique - highly sensitive to the environmental impacts resulting from human activities From 2016 all new passenger and cruise ships are not allowed to release their sewage into the sea (MARPOL Convention Annex IV). From 2018, the same ban will apply to the rest of the passenger and cruise ships travelling in the Baltic Sea.

CLEANSHIP Strategy for Port Reception Facilities for ship-generated waste Create a common understanding on technical and operational aspects on sewage delivery to Port Reception Facilities (PRF:s) Suggest constructive solutions for at functional and effective system for delivery, reception and treatment of sewage from passenger ships Create an outline for a Guidance on Technical and Operational Aspects of Sewage Delivery to PRF:s

Excessive nitrogen and phosphorous loads from sea-based sources into the Baltic have to be reduced In 2011 IMO (MEPC 62) approved new Regulations under Annex IV of the MARPOL has designated the Baltic Sea as a Special Area for sewage. Discharge of sewage into the sea from passenger ships will be prohibited unless the ship uses an approved sewage treatment plant, capable of reducing nutrients on board, according to the established concentrations. Alternatively, untreated sewage could be delivered to a Port Reception Facility (PRF). The Baltic Sea Special Area will enter into effect when the Baltic Sea Countries notify IMO that adequate port reception facilities for sewage in their passenger ports are available.

HELCOM Contracting States have in 2010 agreed to take all necessary measures to ensure availability of adequate port reception facilities for sewage in their passenger ports. As soon as possible, and latest by 2015 according to the IMO Guidelines for ensuring the adequacy of port waste reception facilities (MEPC.83.44) This Road Map shall be the basic tool for substantial decrease of operational discharges and illegal discharges into the Baltic Sea by all ships, irrespective of their nationality

COMPOSITION OF SEWAGE The composition of sewages to PRF:s depends on ship type, sailing distance and number of passengers Typical sewages on cruise ships and ferries Heavy metals Nutrients Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) pre-screening and bio-residue materials used on cruise ships NOTIFICATION Shall be made with relevant references to IMO, HELCOM and EU Regulations (HELCOM Recommendation 23/1, Directive 2000/59/EC Article 6)

SEWAGE DELIVERY MAINS IMO GISIS - Global Integrated Shipping Information System - port reception facilities database Differences between ferry and cruise traffic are resulting in different amounts of produced sewage and their types of black waters and grey waters, mixed Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) creates risks that have to be dealt with best practice on how to reduce the H2S formation on board the vessels indicate where and how to monitor the H2S levels notification of deliveries of sewage with exceptionally higher H2S Clogging is also to be dealt with, depending on the different solutions and capacities of respective on-board system

PUMPING CAPACITY Dimensions for an international pumping standard in connection with MARPOL Annex IV (table in Regulation 10) are recommended for use in the Baltic Sea Best Management Practice has become elaborated by Port of Helsinki, Ports of Stockholm and Port of Oslo There is a need to agree in between the BSR Countries concerning pumping capacity

PORT CAPACITY TO RECEIVE WASTEWATER Depends in the given port mostly on: passenger traffic volume size of the passenger ships visiting Cruise ships and ferries have very different conditions: Cruises are planned several years in advance, and create large volumes of sewages. Cruisers are also often equipped with Advanced own Waste Water Treatment Plants, AWTS, and Marin Sanitation devices, MSD Ferries are subject to extremely short turn around times, but have better possibilities to plan beforehand to sewage delivery It is important to ensure that the capacity in port is large enough, so that use of the facilities do not cause undue delay to the ships!

CRUISE & FERRY PORTS CRUISE PORT Best practice is direct discharge of sewage from the ships to municipal sewage systems at quays where the ships berth. FERRY PORT Adequate receptions - best practice are direct shoreside connection. Discharge of sewage can also be made to tank barges of sufficient capacity. There are limited space in some quays for fixed systems.

MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Temporal/maintenance problems should be dealt with, so that alternative reception facilities can be arranged. IMO has a revised consolidated format for reporting alleged inadequacy of port reception facilities. Report of compliance is important. Planning for emergency situations should form part of our recommendations.

CAPACITY FOR THE MUNICIPALITY TO RECEIVE SEWAGE This is a most essential part of the PRF chain! Has to be planned for between each municipality and its port It is a must that the municipal sewer system and waste water treatment plants are in place and has adequate capacity to receive waste deriving from its port Ports and municipalities are therefore encouraged to cooperate fully in handling ships sewage, and when needed to fulfill the HELCOM implementations of regulations, to improve their municipal capacity to receive and treat the ship sewage

Benefits Onshore Power Supply - OPS Reduced emissions to air Reduced usage of fossil fuel Reduced noise Better working environment in engine room Possibility to maintain auxiliary engines and other systems during port stays Aux engines are used less hours Reduced cost per kwh

OPS example Stena Line Environmental benefits per year, potential for seven ferries 13 000 000 kwh green electricity 3 250 tons oil 10 400 tons carbon dioxide 6.5 tons sulphur dioxide

OPS systems - example Low-voltage system 380 volts 20 cables Time-wasting to connect Poor ergonomics High operating cost High-voltage system 10 500 volts 1 cable 15 min to connect High demands on electrical safety Transformer on board

Important during planning phase Cooperation is necessary! Calculate on the energy balance to obtain right dimension of the system Various load over the year Vessels often have 60 Hz & shore net 50 Hz, frequency converter needed Transformer is needed onboard to change the voltage Decide if the cable shall be onbord or ashore Involve staff onboard to make sure that the connection is ergonomic feasible

FEE STRUCTURE It is essential with an Application of the by HELCOM recommended No-special -fee system to ship generated wastes and marine litter In some of the countries the costs for upgrading of the port s and the municipality sewage reception systems to the needed level are regarded as high and becoming principal obstacle for the implementation of the HELCOM And IMO strategy for BSR CLEANSHIP has collected info about in which ports we face problems of this nature www.portoftrelleborg.se

Thank You for Your attention!