Transport Statistics for Surrey Movement Monitoring Report 2008/9



Similar documents
East Ayrshire Council Road Safety Plan

STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ROAD CASUALTY REVIEW

Business Life Insurance Procurement Plans - County Level Planning

Child Road Safety Audit for South Gloucestershire

Earnings in Kent 2015

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report

1. The consultation seeks views on the vision, targets and measures for improving road safety in Great Britain for the period beyond 2010.

Reported road accidents involving young car drivers: Great Britain 2011

An analysis of collisions & casualties: 18 months pre and post launch Dorset County Council

Housing for people who need care and support

Review of 20 mph zones in London Boroughs. by D C Webster and R E Layfield. Published Project Report PPR243

Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan Revised April Objective 3 Reduce casualties and the dangers associated with travel

Road Casualties in Kent. Annual review Published August 2015

Type (Claim/Business Credit Card. Total miles claimed (less home to business miles) Category of Travel (Train/own car) Cost ( ) Date

May The Right Direction. The Mayor s Strategy for improving transport safety, security and reliability in London Executive Summary

RUNNYMEDE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMME PROGRESS FOR 2003/ /05 AND BID FOR 2005/06 TO 2010/11

The Personal Care and Support service How we can help

Your cold weather guide to services in Surrey. It s important that we are all prepared for bad weather or emergencies during the winter months.

MOTORBIKE RIDERS AND CYCLISTS

Home Energy Conservation Act. Further Report for the Surrey Climate Change Partnership (SCCP) Partners Include: Elmbridge Borough Council

11. Monitoring Performance monitoring in LTP2

Reported Road Accident Statistics

Care and support for adults in Surrey. Information for you or someone you care for

Casualties in Greater London during 2013 June 2014

Great Britain Road Safety - Plans, Targets and Measures

Mobile Phone and Seat Belt Usage Rates in London 2008

CANADIAN ROAD SAFETY YOUTH CONFERENCE ENFORCEMENT. Police Constable Mike Taylor # 8855 Toronto Police Service

Oxfordshire County Council Road Traffic Accident Casualty Summary 2010

Road Safety Plan 2010

Driving as a Public Health Problem.

THE MOBILITY AND SAFETY OF OLDER DRIVERS IN BRITAIN. Mitchell, Christopher (Kit)

Your cold weather guide to services in Surrey

Title. Pedal cyclist casualties, 2013

CHAPTER 1 Land Transport

Welsh Fire and Rescue Services Road Safety Strategy

Do you know where to go for care and support services in Surrey?

Strategic targets board as a management tool for Spanish road safety

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

How to reduce road injuries through best-practice speed management : Learnings from Australia s experience

The number of fatalities fell even further last year to below 6,000 for the first time in 54 years since 1953.

2014/15 Performance Measures and Targets

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: Annual Report. File: 69282_Junctions_6_Sheet Client: TFL. Size: 450x300 Date: 15/10/13

Speed Cameras: The Case in Favour

Reckless Driving Wrecks Lives Ayrshire

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: Annual Report

Safety In Numbers. Halving the risks of cycling

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

Central London ongestion charging

POLICY SEAT BELTS IMPACT{ National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention

Killed 2013 upper estimate Killed 2013 lower estimate Killed 2013 central estimate 700

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

To provide further details on the setting of fees associated with Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Licensing.

The Relationship between Speed and Car Driver Injury Severity

New Zealand all-age mandatory bicycle helmet law

Children and road safety: a guide for parents

NORTH EAST Regional Road Safety Resource

INCREASING MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE

ON YOUR BIKE 1 A PROBLEM FOR CYCLISTS. Activity A picture story is used to ask whether there should be changes in the law to make cycling safer.

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Q. How can we get (and keep) Britain cycling? A. Reducing risk of non-collision incidents will help make cycling more enjoyable.

Injuries and Violence

Statement before the Maryland House Committee on Environmental Matters on House Bill 364. Research on automated speed enforcement. Stephen L.

A23 CHEQUERS ROUNDABOUT, HORLEY: PREDESTRIAN AND CYCLING CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS

Appendix 1: ICD 10 AM (6th Edition) Cause of Injury Code and Description

HELPING US TO HELP YOU

Motorcycle Safety Research in Belgium

20 mph Zones and Speed Limits

IAIN REEVE, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, ECONOMY, TRANSPORT AND PLANNING

Managing Risks Beyond Driver Training

road safety issues 2001 road toll for the WBOP/Tauranga Police area JULY 2002 Regional crash causes Major road safety issues:

The Safety of Schoolchildren on London s Roads

Road Safety Authority Provisional Review of Road Crashes 2013

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

Traffic Accident Trends in Hong Kong

Bedford s Network Management Strategy ( ) November 2010

The total number of traffic collisions in Saskatchewan is up 5% from 51,733 in 2008 to 54,229 in 2009.

CAMPAIGN ASSETS THINK CYCLIST STAKEHOLDER TOOLKIT

VISION ZERO LOS ANGELES PRESS KIT

SAFETY PROCESS. Martin Small

Is the Government right not to set road safety targets and is the outcomes framework appropriate?

Myburgh Attorneys HAVE YOU BEEN INJURED IN A CAR ACCIDENT? DO YOU KNOW SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN INJURED IN A CAR ACCIDENT? WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS?

The Effectiveness of Speed Cameras. A review of evidence

Information Sharing Protocol for Surrey Assault Data Sharing Programme

Legislative Council Panel on Transport. Cycling Safety and Use of Safety Equipment for Cyclists

Basic facts Cycling accidents in Poland Conclusions. Bicycle safety. Aleksander Buczyński Zielone Mazowsze

Economy, Transport and Environment Department. Traffic Management Policy & Guidance

Safer Streets for New York City

CYCLING. RoSPA POLICY PAPER. May 2015

TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATHS DUE TO LEVEL CROSSING ACCIDENTS

Road safety priorities for the EU in 2015

Young drivers where and when are they unsafe: analysis of road accidents in Great Britain

Florida Senate SB 1280

Florida Senate SB 1080

CAMPAIGN ASSETS THINK CYCLIST STAKEHOLDER TOOLKIT

Do you know where to go for care and support services in Surrey?

Cycle Strategy

A Guide to Insurance. look beyond the label

Injury indicators: A validation tool. Road safety indicator specifications

NEW ZEALAND INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGY SERIOUS INJURY OUTCOME INDICATORS

Ways to Reduce to Motorcycle Accidents

Transcription:

7. ROAD SAFETY Surrey is committed to making Surrey s roads safer for all road users. Through careful planning and good road design, together with a strong road safety education and enforcement programme, the Council and its partners strive to reduce injuries and make using the roads a safer and more positive experience. In 2007 the Surrey Safety Camera Partnership installed 10 new safety camera enforcement sites at collision hotspots. They also invested in 26 new Vehicle Activated Signs (VAS) on the approach to camera sites to remind drivers of the limits and make the drivers aware of the enforcement 73. A comparison of before data (the average number of collisions per year in the three years prior to cameras going live), with after data (the average number of collisions per year during the first two years and three months of enforcement provided by the Surrey Safety Camera Partnership to the end of June 2007) shows that there has been: 35% reduction in the total number of collisions (equivalent to 47 fewer collisions per year) across 17 fixed and 3 mobile speed enforcement sites. 71% reduction in collisions resulting in death or serious injury (equivalent to 14 fewer collisions resulting in death or serious injury per year) across 17 fixed and 3 mobile sites. 11% reduction in the total number of collisions (equivalent to 5 fewer collisions per year) across 11 red light violation camera sites. 61% reduction in collisions resulting in death or serious injury (equivalent to 6 fewer collisions resulting in death or serious injury per year) across 11 red light violation camera sites. Details of the other activities, schemes and campaigns currently being run within Surrey can be found on the Surrey County Council Road Safety pages available online at: http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/roadsafety 73 http://www.surrey-safecam.org Issue No. 1 Page 51 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01

7.1. Casualties 8000 7500 Number of Casualties 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Year Figure 7.1: All road casualties in Surrey, 1995-2007 74 Figure 7.1 shows that from 1995 to 1999 there was a stabilisation in the total number of casualties. After 1999 the casualty rate shows more fluctuations with increases in 2001 and 2004 but an overall decrease from 1998 to present. The total number of casualties during the year 2007 has decreased by 19.1% from the 1994-1998 baseline average. This reduction is smaller than the national average decrease of 22.5% and the South East decrease of 18.6%. 75 Further analysis of road casualties in Surrey during 2007 follows. 76 Nearly three quarters (73%) of all injuries in 2007 were caused to car drivers and passengers. This statistic alone highlights the high level of car use within the county, and the importance of reducing the number and lengths of car journeys, to not only improve the environment and congestion, but also to reduce the number of injuries on the road. Just 20% of all injuries in Surrey occurred on motorways and trunk roads. This highlights the fact that most injuries occur on roads with a speed limit of 40 mph or less, and mostly in built-up areas. As a result, the emphasis must continue to be on improving road safety in urban areas. 74 Surrey County Council (2008), Safety Engineering Team 75 Data extrapolated from the Department for Transport (2008), Road Casualties Great Britain: 2007. 76 Surrey County Council (2008) Safety Engineering Team Issue No. 1 Page 52 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01

Road casualty statistics can be broken down and analysed at district level. Table 7.1 shows casualties by district and by mode of transport. Injuries on motorways and trunk roads, which are the responsibility of the Highways Agency, are shown separately. Surrey County Council is responsible for all other public roads. Borough/ Pedal Motor Bus/ Goods Motorway Car Pedestrian Other Horse District Cycle Cycle Minibus Vehicle and Trunk Total Runnymede 269 20 30 46 0 9 3 0 209 586 Spelthorne 238 27 34 45 3 0 20 0 102 469 Surrey Heath 347 29 34 40 4 8 3 0 54 519 Woking 261 36 39 48 3 5 4 0 12 408 Elmbridge 295 34 49 64 4 1 33 0 97 577 Epsom and Ewell 166 24 23 32 4 1 7 0 0 257 Guildford 584 66 54 68 16 25 2 1 148 964 Mole Valley 244 27 35 37 0 4 2 1 64 414 Reigate and Banstead 372 48 38 70 1 9 4 1 117 660 Tandridge 293 23 16 44 3 7 7 0 158 551 Waverley 491 40 26 45 10 23 1 1 71 708 Motorway and Trunk 891 6 2 59 3 48 23 0-1032 County Roads 3560 374 378 539 48 92 86 4-5081 Total 4451 380 380 598 51 140 109 4 1032 6113 Table 7.1: Casualties by district and road user type 77 Table 7.1 shows that 16% of the 6113 casualties in Surrey during 2007 occurred in the Borough of Guildford whilst Epsom and Ewell suffered the least casualties with just 257 or 4% of the total. However it should be noted that the districts that make up Surrey are very different in their make up and therefore direct comparison of casualty statistics should be carried out with caution. For example, since Epsom and Ewell is the smallest borough in Surrey with no motorways or trunk roads, its low overall casualty rate would be expected. 77 Surrey County Council, (2008), Safety Engineering Team Issue No. 1 Page 53 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01

7.2. Killed Or Seriously Injured 1200 Measured Results 1000 Target Trajectory Number of KSI 800 600 400 200 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Year Figure 7.2: Total number of people KSI in Surrey, 1995-2007 78 NB Target was revised in 2005. In 2007, 10% of all injuries in Surrey resulted in death or serious injury. The total number of people killed or seriously injured (KSI) fell by 1%, compared with the previous year. Figure 7.2 shows that there has been a general decrease of 36.8% of people KSI in 2007 compared to the 1994-1998 baseline average (932 people). This decrease is greater than the national decrease of 35.2%, and the South East decrease of 25.7% 79. The original Surrey target was a 29% reduction in casualties by 2006 (corresponding to the national target of a 40% reduction by 2010). This target has since been stretched through a Local Public Service Agreement (LPSA) so that a 53% reduction is to be achieved by 2008. 80 In light of the figures mentioned above, Surrey s KSI casualty reduction performance is on course to achieve the Government s target for 2010, but not Surrey County Council s target for 2008. 78 Surrey County Council (2008), Safety Engineering Team 79 Department for Transport (2008), Road Casualties Great Britain: 2007 80 Surrey County Council (2008), Safety Engineering Team Issue No. 1 Page 54 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01

120 100 Measured Results Target Trajectory Number of Child KSI 80 60 40 20 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Year Figure 7.3: Total Number of child KSI in Surrey, 1995-2007 81 Figure 7.3 shows that unlike all KSI, there has been a variation of both increases and decreases in child KSI during the period 1995-2005. The relatively low numbers of child KSIs are especially susceptible to random fluctuations that occur from year to year in road safety statistics. It should be noted that 2003 and 2006 were exceptional years given the low number of child KSI casualties when compared with other years. Child KSI in 2007 shows a 55.5% decrease when compared against the 1994-1998 baseline average. This can be compared favourably against the South East decrease of 48.6% and the national decrease of 54.9%. 82 The Surrey target is a 40% reduction in child casualties by 2007 (corresponding to the national target of a 50% reduction by 2010). This target has been achieved, and Surrey s Child KSI casualty reduction performance is on course to achieve the Government s target for 2010. 81 Surrey County Council (2008), Safety Engineering Team 82 Data extrapolated from the Department for Transport (2008), Road Casualties Great Britain: 2007 Issue No. 1 Page 55 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01

Altogether, these figures highlight the significant progress made in Surrey towards the Government's target of reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured (KSI) in Great Britain in road accidents by 40% by 2010 compared with the baseline average for 1994-1998. For more information about road accidents and casualties in Surrey please visit the following website: http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/roadsafety Issue No. 1 Page 56 of 162 Document No. 3368/TS6/Doc_01