LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYZER



Similar documents
PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

DryWeight BulkVolume

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES FOP FOR AASHTO T 27 (11)

Standard Test Procedures Manual

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

Standard Test Procedures Manual

DETERMINING ASPHALT CONTENT FROM ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES BY THE IGNITION METHOD

Sieve Analysis of Aggregates

THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Florida Method of Test for TESTING OF GROUND TIRE RUBBER Designation: FM 5-559

Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations

Filter Aid Filtration

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Hands-On Labs SM-1 Lab Manual

SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE

Shampoo Properties Evaluation General Science

POWDER PROPERTIES LABORATORY

Factors Affecting Enzyme Activity

METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND

Standard Test 1. SCOPE Description of Test

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

To measure the solubility of a salt in water over a range of temperatures and to construct a graph representing the salt solubility.

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

Determination of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated Biomass March 2008 Material

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

COMPACTING BITUMINOUS SPECIMENS USING THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)

Chapter 8 Design of Concrete Mixes

8.9 - Flash Column Chromatography Guide

The Basic Principles of Sieve Analysis

Where the exp subscripts refer to the experimental temperature and pressure acquired in the laboratory.

Using the Surface Zeta Potential Cell Kit

MOISTURE (Karl Fischer, Buffered)

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/ P4

Method Development and Validation for Particle Size and Shape Measurements

experiment5 Understanding and applying the concept of limiting reagents. Learning how to perform a vacuum filtration.

Determination of a Chemical Formula

Measuring ph in Water or CaCl2 Using a ph Meter. Compiled by Darren Murray, June 30, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3

SOLUBILITY OF A SALT IN WATER AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES LAB

Separation by Solvent Extraction

ATT-72/94, SALT SIEVE ANALYSIS. This method describes the procedure for determining the gradation of salt.

CHEM 2423 Recrystallization of Benzoic Acid EXPERIMENT 4 - Purification - Recrystallization of Benzoic acid

Unit 1 - Pure Substances and Mixtures Chapter 2: Solutions

ITEM 330 LIMESTONE ROCK ASPHALT PAVEMENT

Reaction of Magnesium with Hydrochloric Acid (Gas Laws) Chemicals Needed:

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

Experiment #10: Liquids, Liquid Mixtures and Solutions

Particle size measurement of lactose for dry powder inhalers

Physical and Chemical Properties and Changes

PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF A SOAP

Physical Properties of a Pure Substance, Water

GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK

METHOD OF TEST FOR SAMPLING AND TESTING CRUMB RUBBER MODIFIER

EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD

Making Biodiesel from Virgin Vegetable Oil: Teacher Manual

Erosion Resistance Performance Comparison Of Natracil, Stabilizer And Envirobond s Organic-Lock

COMMON LABORATORY APPARATUS

FEDERAL SPECIFICATION BEADS (GLASS SPHERES) RETRO-REFLECTIVE

DIVISION 300 BASES SECTION 304 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DESCRIPTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Standard Test Method for Water in Petroleum Products and Bituminous Materials by Distillation 1

FAO SPECIFICATIONS FAO PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS. THIRAM tetramethylthiuram disulphide

SEPARATING DUST PARTICLES USING AN AERODYNAMIC DEDUSTER

ACID-BASE TITRATIONS: DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE BY TITRATION WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID BACKGROUND

Cells, Diffusion, Osmosis, and Biological Membranes

Pre-Lab Notebook Content: Your notebook should include the title, date, purpose, procedure; data tables.

SECTION 623 CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND, EPOXY MORTAR AND EPOXY POLYMER CONCRETE OVERLAY SECTION CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND.

KARL FISCHER ELECTROMETRIC TITRATION METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF WATER CONTENT

HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING TEST

Quantifying Bacterial Concentration using a Calibrated Growth Curve

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

ASPHALT PLANT, NOMINAL PRODUCTION OF 160 T/H, IN

INDEX DESCRIPTION MATERIALS APPROVAL OF SUBBASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION MEASUREMENT PAYMENT 6

The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. How Sweet It Is: Enzyme Action in Seed Germination

EXTRACTION OF DNA FROM CALF THYMUS CELLS Revised 2/1/96 Introduction

During Various Aluminum Fabricating Operations

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

<788> PARTICULATE MATTER IN INJECTIONS

Division 2 Section Section 02795

Standard Test Procedures Manual

INSTRUCTIONS Edition AC

Non-polar hydrocarbon chain

Determining the Quantity of Iron in a Vitamin Tablet. Evaluation copy

1. The Determination of Boiling Point

Making the Most of SáOá SM Services

How to prepare your baby s bottle

Mixing Rigid PVC. Oxy Vinyls, LP Occidental Tower 5005 LBJ Freeway Dallas, Texas / Technical Report #8

Standard Operating Procedure for Cleaning Nylon Filters Used for the Collection of PM 2. 5 Material

Lab: Properties of Polar and Nonpolar Substances

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

Day -1 RETRIEVAL OF OVARIES AND OOCYTE COLLECTION AND MATURATION

Determining Equivalent Weight by Copper Electrolysis

Cooking at the Speed of light!

Quality Assurance Program. June by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

VALIDATION OF WET AND DRY LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE CHARACTERISATION METHODS.

105 Adopted:

Transcription:

Test Procedure for LASER DIFFRACTION PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYZER TxDOT Designation: Tex-238-F Effective Date: August 1999 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method determines the particle size distribution of material finer than the 200 m (No. 75) sieve. 1.2 The values given in parentheses (if provided) are not standard and may not be exact mathematical conversions. Use each system of units separately. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard. 2. APPARATUS 2.1 Horiba Laser Diffraction Particle Size Distribution Analyzer, or exact equal. 2.2 Rotary micro riffler. 2.3 Small sample splitter. 3. MATERIALS 3.1 Mediums distilled water, glycerin, ethylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol, viscous oil. 3.2 Dispersants sodium pyrophosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, Darvan 821-A, aerosol OT-100% (sodium dioctyl-sulfo-succanate), menhaden oil, viscous oil. 4. PROCEDURES 4.1 Representative Sampling: 4.1.1 Select a representative sample from the lot. This becomes increasingly difficult as the sample size decreases. Samples must range from at least 0.02 1 g to analyze the material. 4.1.2 If the material passing the 150 m (No. 100) sieve is separate from the rest of the aggregate, then obtain from the source (bin, drum, silo, etc.) a sample of approximately 1 kg (2.2 lb.) CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 1 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

4.1.3 If the desired fraction is mixed with the coarser fractions of the aggregate, then separate it from the blend. Select enough aggregate so that approximately 1 kg (2.2 lb.) of material will pass the 150 m (No. 100) screen with dry sieving. Dry sieving must be done by hand. 4.1.4 Dry-sieve the full-graded aggregate sample to separate as much of the fraction passing the 150 m (No. 100) screen as is practical through dry-sieving without causing any appreciable abrasion of the aggregate particles. 4.1.4.1 Several coarser screens must be included so that the amount retained on the 150 m (No. 100) screen is divided into several fractions. 4.1.4.2 The initial steps facilitate the subsequent steps of washing the individual fractions of the full graded sample over the 150 m (No. 100) screen. 4.1.5 Remove and store the fraction passing, by dry sieving, the 150 m (No. 100) screen. 4.1.6 Wash the other aggregate fractions over a 150 m (No. 100) screen to collect the remainder of the particles finer than 150 m (No. 100) screen that adhere to the larger aggregates. Reduce the washing time by washing the larger fractions over the screen separately. 4.1.7 Wash until rinse water looks clean. 4.1.7.1 Include the washing procedure because the particles that are not removed by dry sieving alone tend to be much finer than those that are removed; therefore, testing the dry sieved material alone may not be representative of the true gradation. 4.1.7.2 The sample's particles will conglomerate and cake up during drying. This is expected and not detrimental to the remainder of the analysis. 4.1.8 After drying, carefully and thoroughly mix the sample to break up the conglomerates until the maximum size is approximately 1 mm (0.04 in.) or less. 4.1.9 Mix together the two minus 150 m (No. 100) fractions, one from dry sieving, and the other from washing, to achieve the minus 150 m (No. 100) aggregate sample. 4.2 Quartering: 4.2.1 Spread the entire 1 kg (2.2 lb.) sample out in a clean, dry tray and mix well. 4.2.2 Extract about 800 g of the minus 150 m (No. 100) aggregate and place into a dish by either randomly scooping from the tray or by quartering. Store the remainder in a covered container or closeable bag. 4.2.3 Quarter the 800 g sample once (or split it twice) to achieve a 200 g sample. 4.2.4 Riffle the sample. 4.2.5 Return the remainder to the storage container. CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 2 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

4.3 Riffling: 4.3.1 Divide the samples further by riffling with a Rotary Micro Riffler. 4.3.2 Load sixteen clean containers into the collector and begin riffling the 200 g sample. 4.3.3 When the riffling is complete, and the sample is completely separate in the containers, remove two opposite samples from the collector and return their contents to the riffler chute. Store the contents of the other fourteen containers. 4.3.4 Following the steps outlined above, riffle the sample again into sixteen containers. 4.3.5 The contents of the sixteen containers must weigh approximately 1.5 g each. Cover the containers and label each with the material's designation. After selecting a proper medium and dispersant solution, there are sixteen representative containers of samples to use for analyses. Depending on the volume of the medium/dispersant solution used, each container may yield one to five samples. 4.3.6 Extract the samples from each container with the use of a small, slender spatula. Use the spatula to mix the contents of the container thoroughly prior to drawing out the sample. Do not acquire the sample from the container by sprinkling because this causes segregation. 5. SELECTING MEDIUMS AND DISPERSANTS 5.1 The mediums and dispersants are shown in Table 1. The table is a selection guide for identifying possible medium/dispersant solutions that could work well in analyzing the particle size distribution of a given type of minus 150 m (No. 100) aggregate in Horiba's LA-500. In the table, each of the mediums is coupled with the recommended amount of an appropriate dispersant. Table 1 Mediums and Dispersants Selection Guide Water Insoluble Materials: Mediums Dispersants FINES 1-> 100% Distilled Water 1-> none - Clayey Materials 2-> 99.5% Distilled Water 2-> 0.5% Sodium Pyrophosphate - Aglime 3-> 96% Distilled Water 3-> 4% Sodium Hexametaphosphate (NaPO 3 ) 6 - Baghouse Dusts 4-> 99% Distilled Water 4-> 1% Darvan 821-A COARSE 5-> 49.5% Glycerin 49.5% Distilled Water - Sandy Materials 6-> 69.5% Glycerin 29.5% Distilled Water 7-> 49% Ethylene Glycol 49% Distilled Water 5-> 1% Darvan 821-A 6-> 1% Darvan 821-A 7-> 2% Sodium Hexametaphosphate CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 3 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

Water Insoluble Materials: Mediums Dispersants FINES - Hydrated Lime 8-> 99.5% Isopropyl Alcohol 8-> 0.5% Aerosol OT-100% (Sodium dioctyl-sulfo-succanate) 9-> 99% Isopropyl Alcohol 9-> 1% Menhaden Oil 10-> 79.5% Isopropyl Alcohol 19.5% Glycerin 10-> 1% Menhaden Oil COARSE 11-> Viscous Oil 11-> Viscous Oil 5.2 Selection Procedure: 5.2.1 Test water-insoluble fillers with medium/dispersant combinations 1 through 7, as shown in Table 1. 5.2.2 Test water-soluble fillers with solutions 8 through 11 as shown in Table 1. 5.2.3 After narrowing down an appropriate group of solutions for a filler, compare the solutions for their respective dispersing ability by the test container settlement test described in Section 4.2.2. 5.2.4 Use the 1.5 g samples attained by riffling to select an appropriate medium/dispersant combination for testing. 5.2.5 Select several dispersants from Table 1 based on initial observation of the minus 150 m (No. 100) aggregates (water solubility and relative fineness). 5.2.6 Combine and agitate the minus 150 m (No. 100) aggregate and trial medium/dispersant solutions in separate test containers. 5.2.7 Mark the containers and set in a stand, undisturbed. 5.2.8 After several minutes, observe the containers to determine the best medium/dispersant. The filler that has settled the least is the best dispersed. 6. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS BY LASER DIFFUSION 6.1 Horiba's analyzer determines the particle size distribution of materials while held in a fluid suspension. The detection range of the analyzer is 0.1 200 µm (No. 75) particles. The fluid suspension or slurry is comprised of the following components: sample (powder) fluid medium dispersing agent. 6.2 The sample size varies according to the translucence of the fluid suspension. Depending on the sample's properties, anywhere from 0.02 1 g of powder can yield the proper CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 4 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

concentration required for a 200 250 ml (6.8 8.5 fl. oz.) suspension. Adequate sample sizes, mediums, and dispersants can only be found through experimentation. 6.3 Select an appropriate medium/dispersant combination, as described in the previous section, using the test tube settlement test. Determine the corresponding sample size by running through the testing procedure described in this section. 6.4 In order to assure consistent results of riffled powders, the operator must adhere to the following procedures for operation of the LA-500. The first procedure is the initial warmup procedure, and the second is the sample testing procedure, assuming that a medium/dispersant solution has already been selected and that several samples have already been prepared in the size required. 6.5 Procedures: 6.5.1 Initial Warm-Up: 6.5.1.1 Turn the instrument on and allow it to warm up. 6.5.1.2 If testing water-insoluble samples, add 200 250 ml (6.8 8.5 fl. oz.) distilled water to the ultrasonic chamber; if testing water-soluble samples, add approximately 150 ml (5.1 fl. oz.) of isopropyl alcohol. 6.5.1.3 Set mechanical agitation at 7. 6.5.1.4 Set circulation speed at 7. 6.5.1.5 Continue circulation and agitation for 20 minutes. 6.5.1.6 While running, close the black cover to engage laser, remove the right panel, adjust beam angles by turning the vertical and horizontal displacement screws until all indicator arrows are lit, and return the cover. 6.5.1.7 If there are no leaks, drain the water or isopropyl alcohol. 6.5.2 Running Samples for Particle Size Analysis: 6.5.2.1 The LA-500 testing conditions are set or loaded in from memory. Distribution Type = 1 Method = Volume Reading Time = 100 s. 6.5.2.2 If testing water-insoluble samples, add 200 to 250 ml (6.8 to 8.5 fl. oz.) distilled water to the ultrasonic chamber; if testing water-soluble samples, use approximately 150 ml (5.1 fl. oz.) of isopropyl alcohol. 6.5.2.3 Begin mechanical agitation at 7. 6.5.2.4 Start circulation through measuring cell at speed 7 for at least 4 minutes. CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 5 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

6.5.2.5 Allow flow through cell for a few minutes. 6.5.2.6 Observe diffraction pattern for stability. If this is the first test since power up, the concentration level of the medium/dispersant alone may appear significant, but the initial Blank Value will compensate. 6.5.2.7 Check system for leaks. 6.5.2.8 Record the Blank Value if the diffraction pattern seems stable, with no wild fluctuations in any of the channels. 6.5.2.9 Observe diffraction image for stability, especially the concentration level (the concentration level must be stable and at its thinnest point). 6.5.2.10 Begin ultrasonic agitation at a 2-minute interval. 6.5.2.11 Immediately begin to add the sample slowly into the ultrasonic chamber with a spatula until the concentration is in the good region. If the desired concentration level is not reached after the 2 minutes of ultrasonic agitation has expired, repeat the test, adding the sample at a faster rate. 6.5.2.12 If there is too much of the sample, add more medium/dispersant solution to 'thin' out the slurry. With increased ultrasonic agitation the concentration will tend towards the thin region; however, this is not suggested practice because increased ultrasonic agitation will lower the repeatability of the results. 6.5.2.13 Allow the diffraction pattern to stabilize (2 minutes minimum), then begin the analysis. 6.5.2.14 When all replicate tests on the current sample are completed, drain the system. 6.5.2.15 While running, remove the black cover to engage the laser, remove the right panel, adjust beam angles, and return the cover. 6.5.2.16 If there are no leaks, drain the water or isopropyl alcohol. 6.5.2.17 Repeat the testing procedures for the next sample, if the sample is of the same material and the same medium/dispersant solution is to be used. 6.5.2.18 Remove and clean the measuring cell if a new material is to be tested. Note 1 Avoid testing in excessively dusty areas. Trapped lint in a sample can considerably influence the results of the analysis. In normal laboratories, especially where aggregate testing is conducted, air-borne particulates are excessive. For these reasons, take special care when preparing and storing the samples. Note 2 Using cleaned and towel-dried equipment (beakers, pan, tubes, etc.), as well as rinsing the equipment with distilled water helps minimize the risk of unwanted foreign contaminants. When towel drying, use a lint-free towel because air-drying tends to attract more air-borne particles to the equipment. Note 3 Using water in testing is imperative; however, using water in equipment and sample washing is also encouraged. If a sample is washed with regular water, minerals are deposited on the sample while drying. These deposits can affect the results of a CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 6 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999

gradation analysis. This is evident when considering that the solubility of the minerals vary with each of the mediums used to conduct the test. Use of water avoids contamination of the sample by unwanted mineral precipitates or residues. If possible, use compressed air to disperse the water after washing. Note 4 When drying samples in conventional or microwave ovens, avoid any excessive airflow over the sample. For conventional ovens, maintain a temperature of 110 ± 5 C (230 ± 9 F). Minimize any loss of the sample when drying by not positioning samples directly under exhausts or fans, by using tall beakers or containers, and/or keeping the airflow to a minimum. During mixing of large quantities of a sample, be careful not to lose significant amounts of the sample to the air by overly vigorous agitation. Covered storage for both cleaned equipment and prepared samples is imperative for proper sampling. CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 7 7 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 1999