Antennas. Antenna Design Kit. M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001. The primary elements of a synthesis array. The Antenna Structure

Similar documents
Antenna Glossary Before we talk about specific antennas, there are a few common terms that must be defined and explained:

Antenna design for Space Applications M. Sabbadini European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

Selecting Receiving Antennas for Radio Tracking

Pillbox Antenna for 5.6 GHz Band Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW

RADIATION PATTERNS. The half-power (-3 db) beamwidth is a measure of the directivity of the antenna.

Rec. ITU-R F RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

REPORT ITU-R BO Broadcasting-satellite service earth station antenna pattern measurements and related analyses

Chapter 1 ANTENNA FUNDAMENTALS. Paul Wade W1GHZ (ex-n1bwt) 1994,1997,1998 ANTENNA BASICS

ASTRA 3B HORN ANTENNA DESIGN

Fraunhofer Diffraction

The Wide Field Cassegrain: Exploring Solution Space

Antenna Measurement 1 Antenna Ranges antenna range

Helical Feed Antennas Paul Wade W1GHZ 2002

Grazing incidence wavefront sensing and verification of X-ray optics performance

Sensor and Simulation Notes. Note 479. October A Dual-Polarity Impulse Radiating Antenna

A Guide to Acousto-Optic Modulators

New Modelling Capabilities in Commercial Software for High-Gain Antennas

Analysis of the G3LTF Dual Band Feed for 23cm and 13cm Paul Wade W1GHZ 2004

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB COMPUTATIONAL OPTICS RAYLEIGH-SOMMERFELD DIFFRACTION INTEGRAL OF THE FIRST KIND

Synthetic Sensing: Proximity / Distance Sensors

Electromagnetic radiation exposure: assessment against ACA mandated limits

v = fλ PROGRESSIVE WAVES 1 Candidates should be able to :

Optical Standards. John Nichol BSc MSc

APPLICATION NOTE ULTRASONIC CERAMIC TRANSDUCERS

Chapter 11 PARABOLIC DISH FEEDS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Paul Wade N1BWT 1997,1998

Antenna Deployment Technical Brief

GLOBAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING &TECHNOLOGY: YSR DIST. Unit VII Fiber Optics Engineering Physics

AP Physics B Ch. 23 and Ch. 24 Geometric Optics and Wave Nature of Light

WAVELENGTH OF LIGHT - DIFFRACTION GRATING

Omni Antenna vs. Directional Antenna

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment:

Chapter 4 PARABOLIC DISH ANTENNAS Paul Wade N1BWT 1994,1998

APPLICATION NOTE AP050830

Electromagnetic radiation exposure: assessment against ACA mandated limits

Antenna Basic Concepts

Physics 25 Exam 3 November 3, 2009

Simplified procedure for evaluating the coverage area of a multifeed shaped antenna Application to the planning of a broadcasting satellite system

Diffraction and Young s Single Slit Experiment

Diffraction of a Circular Aperture

Antenna Properties and their impact on Wireless System Performance. Dr. Steven R. Best. Cushcraft Corporation 48 Perimeter Road Manchester, NH 03013

Algebra 1 Course Title

EE302 Lesson 14: Antennas

Large Dish Cassegrain Development Using CAD & Spreadsheet For Millimetric Bands & Practical Implementation.

Waves - Transverse and Longitudinal Waves

First let us consider microscopes. Human eyes are sensitive to radiation having wavelengths between

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M (Question ITU-R 88/8)

United States Patent [191 Green

Fiber Optics: Fiber Basics

Designing Log Periodic Antennas

W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ

Antenna Patterns and Their Meaning

5. ANTENNA TYPES. Figure 5. The vertical dipole and its electromagnetic equivalent, the vertical monopole

What are Fibre Optics?

Applications in EMC testing. Outline. Antennas for EMC Testing. Terminology

A Novel GPS Survey Antenna

An octave bandwidth dipole antenna

Development of Optical Wave Microphone Measuring Sound Waves with No Diaphragm

Title: "Fixed-link wind-turbine exclusion zone method" Author: D F Bacon Status: released 28 Oct '02 Version: 1.1

HUMAN EXPOSURE TO EMR: ASSESSMENT OF AMATEUR RADIO STATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACA REQUIREMENTS

Two primary advantages of radars: all-weather and day /night imaging

Chapter 22: Electric Flux and Gauss s Law

Optical Communications

m Antenna Subnet Telecommunications Interfaces

Design and Electromagnetic Modeling of E-Plane Sectoral Horn Antenna For Ultra Wide Band Applications On WR-137 & WR- 62 Waveguides

Antennas 101 The Basics. Ward Silver NØAX

Acoustic GHz-Microscopy: Potential, Challenges and Applications

Magnetic Field of a Circular Coil Lab 12

42 CHAPTER 1. VECTORS AND THE GEOMETRY OF SPACE. Figure 1.18: Parabola y = 2x Brief review of Conic Sections

The promise of ultrasonic phased arrays and the role of modeling in specifying systems

Reflection and Refraction

Efficiency, Dispersion and Straylight Performance Tests of Immersed Gratings for High Resolution Spectroscopy in the Near Infra-red

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

Chapter 2 ELECTROMAGNETIC HORN ANTENNAS Paul Wade N1BWT 1994,1998

National Centre for Radio Astrophysics. Fitting Beamwidths for Broadband Feeds

Electromagnetism - Lecture 2. Electric Fields

OPTICAL FIBERS INTRODUCTION

I. Wireless Channel Modeling

Printed Dipole Array Fed with Parallel Stripline for Ku-band Applications

Antennas & Propagation. CS 6710 Spring 2010 Rajmohan Rajaraman

Geometric Optics Converging Lenses and Mirrors Physics Lab IV

CHAPTER 4. Electromagnetic Spectrum

Proposal for a Slot Pair Array Having an Invariant Main Beam Direction with a Cosecant Radiation Pattern Using a Post-Wall Waveguide

HW6 Solutions Notice numbers may change randomly in your assignments and you may have to recalculate solutions for your specific case.

Optical modeling of finite element surface displacements using commercial software

COLLATED QUESTIONS: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

Antennas. Antennas are transducers that transfer electromagnetic energy between a transmission line and free space. Electromagnetic Wave

Small Dishes for Portable 1296 EME by Allen Katz, K2UYH

ALMA Newsletter. ALMA In-depth. How Will ALMA Make Images? April 2010

LIST OF CONTENTS CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE DECLARATION DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

- the. or may. scales on. Butterfly wing. magnified about 75 times.

LECTURE 18: Horn Antennas (Rectangular horn antennas. Circular apertures.)

Unit 9: Conic Sections Name Per. Test Part 1

EXPERIMENT O-6. Michelson Interferometer. Abstract. References. Pre-Lab

THE PARABOLA section

Various Technics of Liquids and Solids Level Measurements. (Part 3)

2.1 Three Dimensional Curves and Surfaces

A Method for Measuring Amplitude and Phase of Each Radiating Element of a Phased Array Antenna

Examples of Uniform EM Plane Waves

Structure Factors

CHAPTER4 GENERAL ASPECTS OF MUTUAL

Transcription:

Antennas The Antenna Structure The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001 * Backup structure * Reflector surface(s) shape accuracy construction * Two axis Mount Antenna Design Kit Parabola: wavefront Basic shapes : conic sections Parabola Hyperbola Ellipse All rays parallel to the axis are concentrated to a point (the focus). All paths from a wavefront to the focus are of equal length. 1

Hyperbola: Ellipse P Source at one focus. B A Light converging towards B -> reflecting off the hyperbola: converges at A For an arbitrary point P on the hyperbola, (AP BP) = constant Rays are reflected by the ellipse to the second focus And all these paths have the same distance Correctly focussed antenna: Equi-length paths from axial wavefront to the receiver 2

Operational Characteristics (I) Beam width = Full Width at Half Power Main Beam the central lobe Sidelobes the secondary responses Note: logarithmic scale (db) ATCA @22 GHz Operational Characteristics (II) GAIN: How much energy can the antenna extract from a wavefront? Depends on: Antennas as primary elements in an aperture synthesis array 1. Beamwidth defines the field of view 2. Collecting Area defines Gain which defines sensitivity 3. Large diameter = high sensitivity = small beamwidth - antenna size - efficiency - wavefront orientation relative to boresight (beam pattern) 3

To calculate the radiation pattern : Compute field in focal plane from surface currents excited by the incoming wavefront. In detail: 1. Compute the phase of the currents on the surface = 2 π (path from wavefront) / λ 2. For each point in the focal plane, sum the contribution from each surface current. Need path from surface to focal plane for phase and (1/R) field reduction. 3. Compute the coupling of the electric field distribution to the feedhorn. Notes. 1. These curves are generic as to (Focal Length/Diameter) F/D=0.4 (eg, Parkes) F/D=2.0 (eg, ATCA) 2. The plate scale (=displacement in focal plane for a given angle offset from boresight) is proportional to Focal Length Antennas with same (F/D) have same focal plane function; BUT the larger the antenna, the smaller the beamwidth. 3. The axis is expressed in wavelengths 4. The higher the frequency, the smaller the beamwidth 4

GAIN : The Problem. The coupling of the feed horn to the focal plane field is critical. It sets the efficiency of the antenna typically 60%. The feed horn expects a particular field distribution (phase and amplitude) which a conic section reflector cannot deliver. Alternative view : the feed horn as a transmitter This is the AT feed pattern, designed for a subreflector which subtends 28 deg. at the feed. it is down 50% at 7 degrees from boresight It is difficult to reconcile the goals: 1. Uniform illumination on reflector (broad beam) 2. Not wasting energy, with some radiation missing the subreflector (narrow beam). Remedies: 1. Shaped reflectors to modify the focal plane distribution - equivalent to the Schmidt Corrector plate. 2. Focal plane array to construct a super-feed Shaped Reflectors The secondary is slightly conical in the central region to redistribute the energy flow from main reflector to the feed. - Uniform plane wave at the main reflector - Converging gaussian at the feed. The main reflector has to be tweaked to retain the constant path length criterion. 5

The main reflector deviates from a parabola by about 30 mm Surface deviation (mm) 20 10 0-10 -20-30 Deviation in MR profile from parabola (true - parabola) Sensitivity to subreflector mis-positioning - Lateral (in focal plane) null for ~ 0.5λ displacement. largely recovered with a pointing correction -Axial null for ~ 1λ displacement no operational fix. -40 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Radial distance (m) Radial distance (m) Additional losses : Blockage 1. Subreflector 2. Feed Legs (quadrupod on the AT antennas) plane wave shadows (radiation which does not reach the main reflector) spherical wave shadows (radiation blocked between the main and the sub-reflector) The blockage paradox : The loss can scale as TWICE the area. A thought experiment: remove the outer ring of panels. - you lose first of all because the collecting area is reduced. - you lose a second time because the feed is designed for the original F/D. You could recover this second component with a new feed. The AT shaping performs a similar trick on the sub-reflector blockage. 6

2 Surface Errors Ruze formula Let σ be the rms surface error. This translates to an rms phase error of (4πσ/λ). In computing the focal plane field, the sum will be reduced by the phase error by ~cos (4πσ/λ), and the power, by the square of this. Unwanted Stray Radiation The receiver signal = astronomical signal + 3 K background + atmosphere + scattered, stray radiation More correctly : (4πσ / λ) G = G 0 e Alternative approach assess antenna as a transmitter. Reciprocity Theorem : transmit pattern = receive pattern Algorithm: 1. Launch wave from the feed (= expanding spherical wave) Shaped Reflector Subreflector is slightly conical in the central region to redistribute the feed s radiation. 2. Compute the phase and amplitude of the surface currents 3. Transform to the Aperture Plane 4. Compute the far-field wave due to the aperture plane fields - More uniform illumination. - Reduce impact of central blockage - Improve efficiency 7

Feeds are compact and corrugated horns The shaped reflectors redistribute the feed s radiation, The inner profile is curved The inner surface has grooves Cross-section of a horn Step 2 : Compute the phase and amplitude distribution over the main reflector surface. Step 3 : Compute the far-field distribution 2π r j2π cos( φ ) sin( θ ) A( θ ) = λ V ( r) dr e dφ 0 J1(2π ( R / λ) θ ) A ( θ ) = 2π ( R / λ) θ 8

Sidelobes J 1 (x)/x --- 2% sidelobe Aggravation due to blockage Surface Errors Spillover G 2 (4πσ / λ ) = e G0 (Ruze) The Antenna Structural Characteristics Backup structure Reflector surface(s) Shape Accuracy Construction Two-axis mount 9

Antenna Design Focussing Ray tracing Equi-phase paths Single Reflector ( Prime Focus ) parabola Dual-Reflectors Cassegrain (parabola+hyperbola) Gregorian (parabola+ellipse) Electromagnetic Characteristics Gain Collecting Area : antenna aperture that intercepts an incoming wavefront. Efficiency : the useful fraction of the aperture Radiation Pattern Beamwidth sidelobes Focal Plane Considerations Energy distribution in the focal plane Feed Antenna + Receiver Focal Plane Arrays = radio photographic plate Antenna - Design Reciprocity Transmit pattern = Receive pattern Procedure Feed pattern > (ray tracing) : field distribution in aperture plane > far field pattern Aperture Plane as intermediate step 10