Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

Similar documents
Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Coal-To-Gas & Coal-To-Liquids

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

Syngas Purification Units

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

SKI Coal Gasification Technology. Feb. 23, 2012

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

Biomass Syngas Production Technology by Gasification for Liquid Fuel and Other Chemicals

Making Coal Use Compatible with Measures to Counter Global Warming

1.3 Properties of Coal

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

Praxair, Inc. Ray Roberge Sr. VP and Chief Technology Officer

Gasification, Producer Gas and Syngas

Coal waste slurries as a fuel for integrated gasification combined cycle plants

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

Clean Energy Systems, Inc.

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

Enhanced power and heat generation from biomass and municipal waste. Torsten Strand. Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

Options for tar reforming in biomass gasification. Klas J. Andersson, Poul Erik Højlund Nielsen - IFC 2012

FURNACEPHOSPHORUS AND PHOSPHORICACID PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 52. July A private report by. the

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

How To Gasify Wood And Agriculture Biomass

PLASMA GASIFICATION: LESSONS LEARNED AT ECOVALLEY WTE FACILITY

COMBUSTION. In order to operate a heat engine we need a hot source together with a cold sink

Biomass Conversion to Electricity: Stand Alone Power Plants, Co-Generation,

Gasförmige und flüssige synthetische Energieträger aus Biomasse Stand der Entwicklungen an der TU Wien. Hermann HOFBAUER, TU Wien

Viresco Energy s Advanced Gasification Technology

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

GENERATION TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Thermochemical Upgrading Workshop Coal to Liquids (F-T) Via Gasification

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Haldor Topsøe Catalysing Your Business

AN OFFER TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DISPOSAL OF M6 PROPELLANT WASTE. Wrocław, POLAND,

Coal Gasification & Fischer-Tropsch

Yu. F. Vasyuchkov*, M. Yu. Bykova* NEW TECHNOLOGY OF GAS EXTRACTION ON THE BASE OF A COAL TO A HYDROGEN TRANSFER

Simulation of a base case for future IGCC concepts with CO 2 capture

COAL, OIL SHALE, NATURAL BITUMEN, HEAVY OIL AND PEAT Vol. I - Coal Technology (II) - Yan Yongjie

COAL, OIL SHALE, NATURAL BITUMEN, HEAVY OIL AND PEAT Vol. II -Extraction of Oil Shale: Surface and In Situ Retorting - Victor Yefimov and Shuyuan Li

Concepts in Syngas Manufacture

COAL GASIFICATION AND CO 2 CAPTURE

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

Stora Enso Fors Ltd Sweden

WATER WALL BOILER FOR AIR AND OXYGEN FIRED CLAUS SULPHUR RECOVERY UNITS

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

(205) (205)

Waste Incineration Plants

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

Simulation of Coal Gasification Process using ASPEN PLUS

NITROGEN OXIDES FORMATION in combustion processes COMBUSTION AND FUELS

STATUS UPDATE OF OLGA TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

Putting a chill on global warming

How To Run A Power Plant

Technologies for small scale Biomass CHP-Plants an actual survey

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

Long-Term Demonstration of CO2 Recovery from the Flue Gas of a Coal-Fired Power Station

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

Energieffektivitet og bærekraft ved 2. generasjons biodrivstoff. Teknisk Direktør Gjermund Røkke

SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT. Thermal Oxidizer

ERK Eckrohrkessel GmbH (2016) 1. Powerful First-Class Boiler and Combustion Systems & Complete Engineering Services

Basics of Steam Generation

Fact Sheet Technology. Bergius-Pier Process (1)

High. times for. hydrogen. Nitin M. Patel and William F. Baade, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., USA,

PRODUCTION AND GASIFICATION OF WASTE PELLETS

Environment Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant for Sustainable Development

Optimizing DRI production using natural gas

Overview of Waste Heat Recovery for Power and Heat

Study Plan. MASTER IN (Energy Management) (Thesis Track)

TOWARDS HYDROGEN ENERGY ECONOMY IN INDIA

Continuous flow direct water heating for potable hot water

Fortum Otso -bioliquid

FLEXICOKING technology for upgrading heavy oil and utilization of by-products

Hydrogen from Natural Gas via Steam Methane Reforming (SMR)

Ecological Aspects of Oil Shale Processing

This article provides a basic primer on an

CO2 enhanced coal gasification and BlueCoal new Clean Coal Technologies proposals from Poland

Gasification of Solid Waste: Is this the recipe for trash to treasure?

Upgrading of Heavy Oils with FLEXICOKING. ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company Tim Hilbert

V. ENERGY SAVINGS IN INDUSTRY

By K.K.Parthiban / Boiler specialist / Venus Energy Audit System

Energy Savings in Methanol Synthesis : Use of Heat Integration Techniques and Simulation Tools.

Transcription:

Paper ID : 20100412 Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification Sri Tapas Maiti, Sri S. Mustafi IEOT, ONGC, MUMBAI, INDIA Email : maiti.tapas@gmail.com Abstract Introduction India s oil reserve shall be exhausted by the year 2025. It is emphasized to use Syngas from coal as fuel for power generation as coal is the most abundant fossil fuel. Coal Gasification Technology Gasification is a process that converts coal to carbon monoxide and hydrogen which is called synthesis gas or syngas. Coal gasification processes available as on date can be classified into three major categories i.e. the Fixed/moving bed, the Fluidized bed and the Entrained bed systems. Moving bed gasifier is the best suited for Indian scenario. Moving-bed gasifiers are characterized by a bed in which the coal moves slowly downward and gasified by a counter-current blast to the coal. The hot synthesis gas comes out from the top of the gasifier and the impurities present in the syngas (e.g. Sox, NOx etc.) are removed downstream before using it to run the turbines. Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology The syngas after purification is used to run the gas turbine to produce electricity. The exhaust gases exchange heat with boiler feed water in a heat recovery system generator(hrsg) to produce HP superheated steam which is fed to a steam turbine to produce additional power. This combination of Brayton cycle & Rankine cycle integrated with gasification of coal is called IGCC power generation. Overall efficiency and plant availability are much higher than that of normal coal based power plant. It is much more environment friendly. Conclusion Japan is engaged in developing advanced IGCC technology and achieved efficiency of 46%. The efficiency can be increased upto 57%in the process of development of new metallurgy for Gas turbines.the efficiency can be achieved upto 65% in the future on the development of newer methods using fuel cells, hybrid systems, advanced combustion systems etc. Main Paper: Fuel consumtion is considered as the measure of a country s growth and development.the consumtion of petroleum products in India is increasing very rapidly. India's oil imports is around 12,00,000 barrels/day (as on 2007). India s own oil production as on 2007 was 8,80,500 barrels/day against oil reserve of around 570,0000000 barrels which means that India s oil reserve shall be exhausted by the year 2025. Significant success to utilize other energy sources e.g. Nuclear, Solar, Wind etc. has not been achieved in India as indicated below: India is suffering from a severe uranium fuel shortage due to a lack of domestic uranium availability, which has held up its ambitious nuclear energy programme. Without uranium fuel, 1

its existing reactors are running at partial capacity producing less electricity and new plants have been delayed repeatedly. Despite an extraordinary investment of money and resources, nuclear energy is a small blip on India's energy horizon, providing barely 3 percent of the electricity produced in the country. Power generation through solar energy needs to have a bunch of solar collectors for a meager requirement. Solar energy may be very cheap but the solar collectors are relatively expensive and require regular upkeep in order to work properly and efficiently. Moreover it is not available continuously and hence hybrid system is required to cover up the deficiency. The main disadvantage regarding wind power is the unreliability factor. In many areas, the winds strength is too low to support a wind turbine or wind farm. In view of the above energy scenario it is emphasized to use the clean coal gasification technology to achieve the energy security of the country. World wide, coal is the most abundantly available fossil fuel accounting for 69% of world s fossil fuel reserve (against only 17% for oil). India is the third largest coal producing country with an estimated reserve of 245 billion tons which is likely to last for more than 200 years at current rate of consumption. Gasification became a commercial process in 1812 and was initially used to produce town gas for lighting and heating purposes. Since the early 1900s syngas has also been used as a chemical feedstock. The last 10-15 years have seen the start of renaissance in gasification technology. There are several different reasons for this but first and foremost is the dramatic increase in energy cost. There are various range of products such as power, chemicals, fertilizers and transport fuels which could be obtained from gasification of coal. Electricity generation has emerged as a large new market since gasification is seen as a means of enhancing the environmental acceptability of coal, as well as of increasing the overall efficiency of the conversion of the chemical energy in the coal into electricity. One of the most attractive options to achieve extremely low environmental pollution is the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC). The IGCC concept opens the well proven combined cycle concept to so called dirty fuels such as coal, refinery residues etc. by adding gasification, air separation and gas cleaning processes to the upstream gas turbine combustor. Coal Gasification technology Gasification is basically a partial oxidation process that converts any carbonaceous feedstock such as coal, petroleum coke, heavy oil & oil tars, biomass etc. into a gaseous product called synthesis gas (syn-gas). Syn-gas mainly consists of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (with some CO 2, H 2 O and contaminants) with the composition depending on fuel and type of gasifier). In a gasification reactor, first drying of the feedstock particles takes place. As the temperature rises, devolatilization occurs and tars, oils, phenols and hydrocarbons are formed. With further increase in temperature these devolatilized substances further decomposed to lighter products like CO, H 2 and CH 4. The fixed carbon which remains after devolatilization is gasified via reactions with O 2, H 2 O and CO 2. Beyond hydrocarbons other elements like sulphur, nitrogen and ash are of major consideration because they also react and produce H 2 S, COS, HCN etc. have to be removed either out of gasifier or downstream in a gas cleaning process. There are three types of gasification technologies developed for IGCC application. The three processes are Fixed/Moving bed processes, Fluidized bed processes and Entrained flow processes. All types of gasifiers can be designed to operate with air or pure oxygen as gasification agent. Oxygen blown gasification is preferred against air as it gives higher cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion rate. It is also useful because it gives smaller plant component dimensions due to absence of nitrogen surplus. Gasifier technologies differ in temperature, carbon conversion rate, efficiency, feedstock size and hydrocarbon content in raw gas starting from fixed bed to entrained flow gasification. 2

Gasification Process Fixed-bed gasifiers are characterized by a bed in which the coal moves slowly downward under gravity as it is gasified by a blast that is generally, but not always, in a counter-current blast of steam & oxygen, to the coal. In such a counter-current arrangement, the hot synthesis gas from the gasification zone is used to preheat and pyrolyse the downward flowing coal. With this process the oxygen consumption is very low, but steam consumption is high and pyrolysis products are present in the product synthesis gas. The operating pressure is from 10-100 bars and the outlet temperature of the synthesis gas is from 400-500 deg. Celcius. Moving-bed processes operate on lump coal which sizes vary from 5-40 mm. An excessive amount of fines, particularly if the coal has strong caking properties, can block the passage of the up-flowing syngas. In this process carbon conversion time is relatively on higher side and it contains tar and phenols which are very difficult to handle. The moving bed processes are the oldest process. Right from sixties this was adopted by Lurgi at Sasol Fluidized-hed gasification is characterized by gasification temperature below the ash melting point and subsequently lower oxygen consumption. This process offers extremely good mixing between feed and oxidant, which promotes both heat and mass transfer. This ensures an even distribution of material in the bed, and hence a certain amount of only partially reacted fuel is inevitably removed with the ash. This places a limitation on the carbon conversion of fluid-bed processes. The operation of fluid-bed gasitiers is generally restricted to temperatures (800-1000 deg celcious) below the softening point of the ash, since ash slagging will disturb the fluidization of the bed. Sizing (1-5mm) of the particles in the feed is critical; material that is too fine will tend to become entrained in the syngas and leave the bed overhead. This is usually partially captured in a cyclone and returned to the bed. The lower temperature operation of fluid-bed processes means that they are more suited for gasifying reactive feed stocks, such as low-rank coals and biomass. The operating pressure is from 10-25 bars. BHEL has developed a 6.2MW IGCC demonstration power plant based on coal gasification through 150 TPD capacity Fluidised bed indigenously at their trichy plant in the year 1997. 3

Entrained-flow gasifiers operate with feed and blast in co-current flow. The residence time in these processes is short (a few seconds). The feed is ground to a size of 100 µm or less to promote mass transfer and allow transport in the gas. Given the short residence time, high temperatures are required to ensure a good conversion (>98%), and therefore all entrained-flow gasifiers operate in the slagging range. The high-temperature (1500-1900 deg. Celcious) operation creates high oxygen demand for this type of process. Entrained-flow gasifiers do not have any specific technical limitations on the type of coal used, although coals with a high moisture or ash content will drive the oxygen consumption to levels where alternative processes may have an economic advantage. Shell advocates this technology and is presently commissioning an Entrained Bed Gasifier in China with coal having 25% ash content. One important point to note throughout all the above is the significance of the slagging behavior of the ash. At temperatures above the ash-softening point, the ash becomes sticky and will agglomerate, causing blockage of beds or fouling of heat exchange equipment. Once above the slagging temperature, at which point the ash has a fully liquid behavior with low viscosity, it is possible again to remove it from the system reliably. Removal Of Impurities Removal of the impurities takes place immediately at the outlet of the reactor by means of a quench cooler in which most of the high-boiling hydrocarbons and dust carried over from the reactor are condensed and/or washed out with gas liquor from the downstream condensation Stage. 4

COAL FEED EXPANSION GAS LP STEAM BFW ASH ASH GAS BFW GAS WATER LIQUOR LIQUOR The gas liquor from the quenched cooler contains suspended matter, sulphur, chloride, NH 3 and NH 4 ions, phenols etc. The gas liquor is further processed for separation of tar and phenol. Then sour gas and ammonia are selectively & separately stripped from the liquor. The sour gas free of ammonia is further processed for sulphur recovery. Ammonia and Sulphur can be used for production of fertilizer and Sulphuric acid etc. The CO 2 can also be removed selectively before combustion and captured carbon dioxide gas can be put to good use, even on a commercial basis, for enhanced oil recovery. This is well demonstrated in West Texas, and today over 5800 km of pipelines connect oilfields to a number of carbon dioxide sources in the USA. Overall in USA, 32 million tonnes of CO 2 is used annually for enhanced oil recovery. The world's first industrial-scale CO 2 storage was at Norway's Sleipner gas field in the North Sea, where about one million tonnes per year of compressed liquid CO 2 separated from methane is injected into a deep reservoir (saline aquifer) about a kilometre below the sea bed and remains safely in place. The US$ 80 million incremental cost of the sequestration project was paid back in 18 months on the basis of carbon tax savings at $50/tonne. Power Generation The syngas, after purification, is burnt in the combustion chamber of the gas turbine with the air from the air compressor. The hot flue gases are expanded in the gas turbine to produce electricity. The exhaust gases still at a very high temperature exchange heat with boiler feed water in a heat recovery system generator(hrsg) to produce HP superheated steam which is fed to a steam turbine to produce additional power. This combination integrated with gasification of coal is called IGCC power generation. 5

Advantage Of Igcc Against Conventional Power Plant Conventional thermal power plants have the disadvantage of causing pollution of the environment at alarming levels. Emissions include oxides of sulphurs, nitrogen, carbon, dust and solid wastes apart from waste heat etc. In case of coal gasification these are eliminated down stream of gasification process and before combustion in GT. The overall efficiency in case of IGCC is more than 40% whereas it is around 33% in case of conventional thermal power plants The Plant Availability in case of IGCC is 85% against 50% in case of conventional thermal power plants because of frequent failure of boiler tubes. The IGCC plant can be commissioned in short duration (about 3 years) due to its modular configuration and capacity addition, if necessary at a later stage, is easy. High ash coal, which are abundantly available in India, are no problem for IGCC whereas they cause considerable problem in conventional thermal power plants. Water requirement is much less for IGCC plant in comparison to conventional thermal power plants Combination of GT & ST the combined cycle is the most efficient & environment friendly. So IGCC method has an edge over the conventional power generation. 6

Conclusion Petrotech-2010 Coal in conventional power plant releases about 75% more carbon dioxide per unit energy produced as compared to the other fossil fuels during the combustion process due to its higher carbon to hydrogen ratio. It is so far regarded as a low quality fuel. However,IGCC method eliminates most of the disadvantages of conventional power plant. It is to mention that Japan is engaged in developing advanced IGCC technology for enhancement of overall efficiency of the system. They have achieved efficiency of 46% and in the process of development of new metallurgy for Gas turbines (upto 1700 deg. Celcius) the overall efficiency could be achieved upto 57%. Finally R&D efforts on the development of newer methods that are more efficient and cleaner such as fuel cells, hybrid systems, advanced combustion systems etc. the overall efficiency can be achieved upto 65% in the near future. 7